U.S. patent number 3,915,090 [Application Number 05/523,573] was granted by the patent office on 1975-10-28 for printed pattern and embossed pattern registration control system.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Armstrong Cork Company. Invention is credited to Robert L. Horst, Richard M. Ringer.
United States Patent |
3,915,090 |
Horst , et al. |
October 28, 1975 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
Printed pattern and embossed pattern registration control
system
Abstract
A system is disclosed for securing registration of a patterned
embossing roll with a similarly patterned printed moving web. The
purpose of the embossing roll is to indent the surface of the
printed web in register with the printing in certain designated
areas. In one embodiment, a series of randomly spaced register
marks on the printed web selvage edge and identically spaced
register marks on the embossing roll are viewed by appropriate
scanners. Electrical signatures representing the two sets of
register marks are generated by the sensors and fed to a signal
correlator for comparison. The correlator determines the degree of
statistical error between the two signatures and displays this
error in the form of a time delay on a CRT (Cathode Ray Tube). If
manual registration control is desired, an operator can manually
adjust the speed or phase of the embossing roll by observing the
peaked wave display on the CRT to bring the roll into a statistical
best fit of the embossing pattern with the printed pattern.
Automatic control of embossing roll speed and orientation to
achieve registration is also possible if the correlator is
interfaced with a digital computer and servo correction motors on
the embosser drive system. The disclosed system is an improvement
over conventional benchmark oriented registration sensing and
control systems in that it is capable of continuous error
determinations and asynchronous error corrections on demand rather
than periodically at the end of pattern length intervals.
Inventors: |
Horst; Robert L. (Lancaster,
PA), Ringer; Richard M. (Lancaster, PA) |
Assignee: |
Armstrong Cork Company
(Lancaster, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
26993522 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/523,573 |
Filed: |
November 14, 1974 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
343569 |
Mar 21, 1973 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
101/181;
101/DIG.36; 101/32; 101/248; 101/470; 101/484; 101/486 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B41F
13/025 (20130101); B31F 1/07 (20130101); B65H
23/1882 (20130101); B31F 2201/0779 (20130101); B31F
2201/0792 (20130101); B31F 2201/0753 (20130101); Y10S
101/36 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B41F
13/02 (20060101); B65H 23/188 (20060101); B41F
013/24 () |
Field of
Search: |
;101/181,248,DIG.12,426,32 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Burr; Edgar S.
Assistant Examiner: Coven; Edward M.
Parent Case Text
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation-in-part of applicant's copending
application, Ser. No. 343,569, filed Mar. 21, 1973 and entitled
"Printed Pattern and Embossed Pattern Registration Control System",
now abandoned.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for controlling the register between the pattern
about to be placed upon a web of material and a pattern which has
already been placed upon a web of material, said pattern being
repeated on the web at a predetermined repeat length, and the
pattern which is to be placed upon the web of material to be placed
thereon in register with the pre-existing pattern, comprising:
a. two scanner means,
1. one scanner means scanning the pattern which exists upon the web
of material,
2. said second scanner means scanning the pattern which is to be
placed upon the web of material, said pattern which is about to be
placed upon the web of material being on the surface of a rotary
pattern-applying structure,
3. both said scanners being positioned the same time distance from
the point where the pattern-applying structure engages the web of
material to apply the pattern thereon,
b. a correlator means receiving continuous electrical signature
signals from the two scanner means and comparing the electrical
signature signals from the two scanner means for the best
statistical match,
1. said correlator means continuously providing an indication of
the phase relationship of the signals from the two scanner means,
said phase relationship of the signals being related to the
relationship of the two patterns being sensed,
2. said correlation means providing an indication of any error in
the relationship between the two signals from the scanner means,
and
c. control means connected with the drive for the pattern-applying
means to adjust the operation of the pattern-applying means so that
the pattern-applying means can be controlled to place its pattern
in register with the pre-existing pattern on the web.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the correlation means provides
a signal to a digital computer in combination with a signal from a
web velocity transducer to develop a correction signal which is
automatically fed to the control means for the pattern-applying
structure to automatically correct the drive of the
pattern-applying structure to bring the pattern thereon in registry
with the pre-existing pattern of the web of material.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the pattern on the web and on
the pattern-applying structure are composed of a main pattern and a
control pattern on the edge of the web and this control pattern is
what is viewed by the scanner means.
4. The method of controlling the register between a pattern about
to be placed upon a web and a pattern which has already been placed
upon the web, said pattern being repeated on the web at a
predetermined length, and the pattern which is to be placed upon
the web of material to be placed thereon in register with the
pre-existing pattern, comprising the steps of:
a. scanning by a first scanner the pattern which is to be placed
upon the web of material, said pattern is on the surface of a
rotary pattern-applying means,
b. scanning by a second scanner the pattern which exists upon the
web of material,
c. positioning both scanners the same time distance from the point
where the pattern-applying means engages the web of material to
apply the pattern thereon,
d. developing continuous pattern signature signals from the
scanners as they scan the patterns, said signals being indicative
of the patterns, and feeding these signals to a comparison
means,
e. comparing the signals from the scanners by statistical means to
secure the best statistical match therebetween and continuously
providing an indication of the phase relationship of the signals
from the scanners, said phase relationship of the signals being
related to the relationship of the two patterns being scanned,
f. providing an indication of any error in the relationship between
the two signals from the scanners, and
g. controlling the drive of the pattern-applying means to adjust
the operation of the pattern-applying means so that the
pattern-applying means can be controlled to place its pattern in
register with the pre-existing pattern on the web.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the signals are compared by
statistical means which utilizes approximately 100 separate points
of comparison between the pattern signatures to develop an error
signal.
6. The method of claim 4 wherein there is the additional steps
of:
a. developing a correction signal by relating the web velocity to
the indicator of any error in the relationship between the two
signals from the scanner, and
b. feeding the correction signal to the control drive means of the
pattern-applying means to automatically correct the drive of the
pattern-applying means to bring the pattern thereon in register
with the pre-existing pattern of the web of material.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the pattern on the web and on the
pattern-applying structure are composed of a main pattern and a
control pattern on the edge of the web and this control pattern is
viewed by the scanners.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention is directed to, but not limited to, an embossing
process for a pattern printed sheet and, more particularly, to a
process and apparatus for securing registration between a patterned
embossing roll and a similarly patterned printed web.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Current practice in automatic registration control is summarized in
a recent article entitled "Web Controls: The State of the Art," by
Geoffrey L. Phillips, in the "Gravure" magazine, Volume 17, No. 11,
Nov. 1971. This article is then followed by another article which
lists various registration control systems produced by different
companies. Current practice involves the use of a registration mark
at a specific location of each pattern repeat or one mark for
several repeats and a cycle-by-cycle error detection with
subsequent pattern phase and/or repeat length corrective
action.
A registration system of the conventional type is marketed by
Registron, a division of Bobst Champlain, Inc., and is sold as
their Model R-500/R-425 system. The system is basically a
specialized control system for maintaining printing registration on
high-speed, multi-color web printing and converting machines. It
has also been applied to embossing type operations. The Registron
system consists of a web scanner, a phase micrometer, a correction
computer, control station and servo correction motor. The task of
each Registron system is to detect any misregister condition with
each revolution of the printing cylinder and automatically control
a servo correction motor(s) which restores the printing
registration in a minimum time without overcorrecting. The need for
automatic registration control is created by the web and press
variables. Variations in web characteristics such as moisture
content, caliber, curl, etc. will all effect the repeat length
established by the first printing station. In addition, variations
in dryer temperature, impression pressure, infeed tension, press
room temperature, humidity, etc. will cause repeat length changes.
An accumulation of such repeat length changes, coupled with any
short-term register variables, would cause scrap if registration
were not controlled.
In the above Registron system, the web scanner views the printed
web as it passes under the scanner. As the register mark passes
beneath the beam of light that is directed on the web by the web
scanner, a pulse is produced. This pulse is compared to a cylinder
reference pulse generated by the phase micrometer. The phase
micrometer is driven by the printing cylinder. The phase micrometer
has two functions. One is to produce a "live" electrical gate which
is used to select the proper register target. The other function is
to produce the reference pulse as described above. The correction
computer is a device which receives the input signals from the web
scanner and the phase micrometer and computes the magnitude and
direction of the register error. Electrical output signals are
generated by the computer to drive a servo correction motor at the
proper speed in the proper direction to eliminate the misregister.
The control station provides for either the manual or automatic
control of both the running register and phase setting during the
normal press operation. The way the corrections are actually made
is that the output of the computer drives a servo correction motor
at a speed proportional to the register error, the rate of register
error and the press speed. As the register error is reduced towards
zero, the servo correction motor runs slower and slower until at
zero error, the servo correction motor is stopped.
The major deficiency of the prior art structures is that register
error determinations are made only at specific points in the
pattern and, therefore, provide an indication at some single point
in time to indicate a change that has occurred over a time span
period. This time span period may normally involve anywhere from 9
to 54 inches in web travel.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Unlike conventional registration systems that provide only periodic
register error determinations, the invention described herein
provides for continuous, high resolution error determinations. A
web of material is passed through normal processing operations
until it reaches a point where it has a printed design on the
surface thereof, and it is just prior to the time that it is
desirable to place an embossed pattern on the web in register with
the printed design. Two phototransistor sensors are positioned to
view two signature tracks. Both phototransistor sensors are spaced
the same distance from the nip of the embossing roll structure. One
is positioned to continuously view the moving web, while the other
is positioned to continuously view either the circumference of the
embossing roll or a signature disc coupled to the embossing roll.
For optimum results, both these surfaces are provided with
registration tracks. However, it is also possible to use the actual
patterns on each surface in place of separate, but pattern-related
tracks. As the pattern track changes, reflectivity of the surface
changes, and this in turn is sensed by the phototransistor sensors.
Since the printed pattern and the embossed pattern are similar, the
output of both phototransistor sensors will be similar; moreover,
if the object patterns are in register, the electrical signatures
will be in time synchronization. The output from the two
phototransistor sensors is fed to a statistical correlator which
continuously compares the outputs. A very high resolution of error
deviation from normal is provided by analysis in real-time of the
cross-correlation function, and this then can be used manually or
automatically to cause a change in the speed and/or phase of the
embossing roll to bring the embossing into register with the
printed design on the web.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 of the drawing is a schematic representation of the control
system of the invention herein;
FIG. 2 is a showing of the selvage edge of a sheet with register
marks;
FIG. 3 is a top view of a repeat pattern and the representation of
the electronic signature of the pattern; and
FIG. 4 is a plotting of the correlation of the above-mentioned
electronic signatures of the printed pattern and embossing
roll.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The schematic representation of the apparatus for carrying out the
invention herein is shown in the drawing as FIG. 1. The web being
processed in the apparatus of the drawing in a conventional
resilient vinyl covering material which has a design printed on the
upper surface thereof. The invention is not specifically restricted
to resilient vinyl floor covering, but could be used with any web
which is moving and has a pattern printed thereon. For example, it
could be utilized with a paper, plastic, rubber, etc. web with a
part of a design printed thereon by one station of a press and it
is now desired to print additional parts of the overall design in
register with the first printing. The invention is applicable to
the registration of any two moving patterned surfaces if one can be
adjusted in relationship to the other. While the invention is shown
on the drawing as an embossing roll structure, it is equally
applicable to printing structures, etc. as described above.
Web 2 is passed through its appropriate processing steps so as to
have on the upper surface thereof a printed design such as that of
FIG. 3. The web moves towards an embossing roll assembly 4 which is
composed of an embossing roll 6 and a back-up roll 8. The embossing
roll 6 is provided with a pattern which is basically the same as
that printed on the web 2. It is desired to place the embossed
pattern on the roll 6 in register with the similar printed pattern
on the web 2. The required registration is secured by the invention
herein.
Two phototransistor sensors 12 and 14 are utilized to sense the
patterns on the web 2 and the embossing roll 6. The patterns can be
a plurality of prior art type register marks 7 which are placed
along the edge of the embossing roll 6 and edge (selvage) of web 2
(or back of web 2) as shown in FIG. 2, or they can simply be the
printed pattern and embossing roll pattern themselves as shown in
FIG. 3 or a specially designed pattern track which is related to
the printed pattern on the web 2. The same pattern of register
marks or design pattern exists on both the embossing roll or an
attendant device and the sheet to be embossed and the drawing shows
these patterns on the sheet only. The pattern on the embossing roll
will be the same as on the sheet. The phototransistor sensors are
placed the same distance from the nip of the embossing roll 6 and
the back-up roll 8. This distance may be a physical measurement
distance or it can be a time distance in that the sensors are
positioned so that the reference marks are in a timed
synchronization whereby the reference signals generated are watched
at the time registration exists. For example, if the
phototransistor sensor 12 scanning the web was positioned 6 inches
upstream from the nip of the embossing roll structure 4, then the
second phototransistor sensor 14 would be placed 6 inches upstream
from the nip of the embossing roll structure as measured along the
periphery of the embossing roll 6. The second phototransistor
sensor 14 is used to scan the pattern on the embossing roll while
the first photo transistor sensor 12 scans the pattern on the
moving web to be embossed and both patterns are the same.
The phototransistor sensor is a transistor which is sensitive to
variations in light and converts these variations into electrical
impulses. An illuminating means is designed to illuminate the areas
to be scanned. As the pattern varies, there will be a variation in
reflectivity, and this in turn will result in variations in the
output signal of the phototransistor sensor. The output of the
phototransistor sensor is directly related to the variations in
reflectivity of the pattern. Each pattern has its own
characteristic variations. The electrical signals of each pattern
or the electrical signature of each pattern varies within each
repeat length, but will repeat itself with each repeat length. The
signal from the register marks 7 on the edge of the web 2 will
provide an electrical signature 9 which is basically a straight
line with a series of peaks spaced as per the spacing of the
register marks (see FIG. 2). The electrical signature for the
pattern as shown in FIG. 3 will be the electrical signature 11 as
shown therein.
The signals from the two phototransistor sensors are then fed into
a digital correlator 16. An example of one such instrument is a
Hewlett-Packard Model 3721A Correlator. The phototransistors 12 and
14 transmit their varying output to the correlator. The correlator
continuously calculates and updates the cross-correlation function
of the two input signals. Briefly, this means that the correlator
operates by repetitively solving the standard statistical equation
##EQU1## and continuously displays on its CRT the most recent
values of the correlation coefficient as the function of the time
between the two input signals x(t) and y(t). The calculated data
are available for manipulation by a digital computer and, also, are
displayed on the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) of the correlator
instrument. The point of maximum correlation is indicated on the
CRT plot by a maximum (or, under certain conditions, a minimum).
Thus, if the pattern signature of one phototransistor sensor is in
phase with the pattern signature of another phototransistor sensor,
the maximum correlation coefficient is at a time delay of zero.
This also means that the embossing roll pattern is going to be in
register with the printed pattern at the nip of the embossing roll
structure 4 for the case of sensors placed at equal time distances
from the nip.
The Hewlett-Packard Model 3721A Correlator, like other
cross-correlators; is provided with two input channels A and B
which receive the signals to be statistically compared. The
phototransistor sensors of this invention are connected to these
channels. The correlator is designed to compute the
cross-correlation function of the input data. This is the process
of establishing a similarity or, in other words, determining the
statistical best fit between the data being fed into the machine.
The cross-correlation function describes the relationship
quantitatively and with respect to time shift between inputs A and
B. The correlator continuously computes and displays 100 values of
the correlation function. The correlator is constantly receiving
new input data and the result is that the correlation function is
continuously updated, and the statistical match between the
electrical pattern signatures is known in real time period. The 100
value simultaneous comparison can be viewed on the CRT display
which is part of the correlator and the operator may use this to
manually make registration error corrections. Additionally, the
Hewlett-Packard Correlator is designed to be used with a digital
computer which provides a means for further data manipulation and
automatic control. The Hewlett-Packard Correlator has a program
control feature, an interface connection point, for permitting a
computer to be interfaced with the correlator so that the error
signal generated by the correlator, which is in effect an
electronic binary signal representing the material which is
displayed on the CRT, can be fed to a digital computer so that the
digital computer in turn can operate the necessary correction
apparatus to bring the patterns into synchronization.
With a visual readout of the cross-correlation function in the form
of a 100 point plot on the CRT display of the correlator 16 as
shown in FIG. 4, it is now possible for an operator to see errors
in registration and take appropriate manual corrective action. With
the correlation maximum displaced to the center of the CRT display
by means of a time delay unit 28, it has been demonstrated that an
operator can adjust the object pattern devices to be in registry to
an accuracy of a few thousandths of an inch. Normally, a zero time
delay error without the time delay unit 28, will put the display
maximum on the left of the display screen and this would allow
errors in one direction only to be viewed for control purposes. In
FIG. 4 peak 15 is the time delay comparison maximum, displaced with
respect to the zero reference at the center of the display through
the use of time delay unit 28. By manually controlling a below
described differential transmission in the drive train of the
embossing roll, it is possible for an individual line operator to
manually control registration by keeping the peak 15 of the display
on the vertical cross 17 of the CRT screen.
It is also possible to automatically control registration using the
invention herein. For the automatic mode of operation, rather than
using the display on the CRT, the correlator will feed its output
in the form of a digital data to a conventional digital computer;
for example, a computer sold under the trade name of IBM,
Hewlett-Packard, etc. The computer is simply hooked into the
correlator at the proper computer connection point built into the
correlator and this then provides the computer 18 with feed-out
data from the correlator. The computer 18 acting upon an
appropriate process algorithm and the data .DELTA.t it receives
from the correlator and the data (v) from velocity transducer 30
can initiate corrective action f (.DELTA.s) to the embossing roll
by means of a servo correction motor and/or motors 20 in the
embossing drive train.
The drive train of the embossing structure 4 can be described as
follows: A conventional drive motor 22 drives a conventional
variable speed transmission 24. The variable speed transmission in
turn drives the back-up roll 8 and a differential draw transmission
26 which is connected to and drives the embossing roll 6. The
differential draw transmission 26 is typically a Graham
transmission or a Fairchild Hiller "Specon" transmission, or the
equivalent. This unit has associated with it a correction motor or
motors 20 which are used to alter the output speed of the
differential transmission 26 to effect registration of the
embossing roll 6 with the printed web 2. The correction motor or
motors 20 change the speed and/or phase of the embossing roll with
respect to the moving web 2 and back-up roll 8 as a result of error
determinations and manual operation or computer control
calculations. The correction motors are remotely controlled by the
operator through manual switches when the apparatus is in the
manual mode of operation or by the computer when it is in the
automatic mode of operation. Consequently, if the embossing roll 6
is out-of-register with the printed web 2, the embossing roll 6
will either be speed varied (up or down) and/or phase shifted to
bring it into register with the printed pattern. A control unit 19
operates the correction motors 20 and this unit may be manually or
computer controlled. If the repeat length of the printed pattern on
the web is less than or more than the pattern on the embossing
roll, then the speed control motor is used to speed up or slow
down, respectively, the embossing roll speed to shrink or stretch
out the pattern being embossed to match it with the printed
pattern. If the pattern length being embossed equals the printed
pattern length, but the patterns are out-of-register, i.e, out of
phase, then the phase control motor is used. This causes a phase
shift between the input drive and the output drive of the draw
transmission and this in turn results in the patterns being placed
in registry.
Therefore, this invention as described above, provides for a new
and improved method of manually or automatically controlling
registration of a pattern to be applied to a web with a pattern
which has already been applied to the same web.
* * * * *