U.S. patent number 3,914,507 [Application Number 05/417,689] was granted by the patent office on 1975-10-21 for method of preparing metal alloy coated composite powders.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Sherritt Gordon Mines Limited. Invention is credited to David A. W. Fustukian.
United States Patent |
3,914,507 |
Fustukian |
October 21, 1975 |
Method of preparing metal alloy coated composite powders
Abstract
Composite alloy coated particles are produced by blending finely
divided metal coated composite particles, such as nickel coated
graphite or cobalt coated tungsten carbide, with finely divided
particles of at least one alloying metal, such as chromium or
aluminum. The powder blend is heated in a protective atmosphere at
a temperature and for a time sufficient to cause the alloying metal
to alloy with the metal coatings of the composite powder particles
without extensive sintering of the powder particles.
Inventors: |
Fustukian; David A. W.
(Edmonton, CA) |
Assignee: |
Sherritt Gordon Mines Limited
(Toronto, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
27160597 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/417,689 |
Filed: |
November 20, 1973 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
122098 |
Mar 8, 1971 |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Application Priority Data
Current U.S.
Class: |
428/404;
106/1.05; 427/214; 428/570; 75/255; 419/35; 427/217 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C23C
10/34 (20130101); B22F 1/025 (20130101); Y10T
428/12181 (20150115); Y10T 428/2993 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
C23C
10/34 (20060101); C23C 10/00 (20060101); B22F
1/02 (20060101); B22F 001/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;117/22,31,100,71R,131,71M,16R ;75/.5BA,.5BB,.5BC ;29/192CP |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
821,728 |
|
Oct 1959 |
|
GB |
|
824,091 |
|
Nov 1959 |
|
GB |
|
Primary Examiner: Sofocleous; Michael
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Piper; Frank I. Fors; Arne I.
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No.
122,098 filed Mar. 8, 1971 and now abandoned.
Claims
What I claim as new and desire to protect by Letters Patent of the
United States is:
1. A process for producing powder particles having a central core
coated with an alloy which comprises the steps of: providing finely
divided particles of an alloying metal and composite particles of a
size within the range of 10 to 850 microns, said alloying metal
being chosen from the group consisting of chromium and a mixture of
chromium and aluminum, each said composite particle having a
central core coated with a layer of material which is metallic,
which is different from the material of the core and which is
capable of alloying with said alloying metal when a mixture of said
compositve particles and said alloying metal particles is heated;
forming a powder mixture which consists of said composite particles
and said alloying metal particles; and heating said powder mixture
under non-oxidizing conditions at a temperature of from about
1650.degree.F to about 2300.degree.F; and continuing said heating
step for a period of time sufficient to ensure that a required
quantity of said alloying metal diffuses into and alloys with the
metal coating of the composite particles without gross sintering
taking place.
2. The process defined in claim 1 including the additional step of
mixing the alloy coated particle with a second alloying metal and
heating the resulting mixture under non-oxidizing conditions at a
temperature and for a period sufficient to ensure that said second
alloying metal forms an alloy with the alloy coating of the
composite particles without gross sintering taking place.
3. The process defined in claim 1 wherein the particles of alloying
metal are less than 50 microns in size.
4. The process as defined in claim 1 wherein the product from the
heating step is comminuted to powder form.
5. The process defined in claim 1 wherein the metal coated on said
central core is chosen from the group consisting of nickel, cobalt
and copper.
6. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the heating step is
carried out at a temperature above about 1830.degree.F.
7. The process defined in claim 1 wherein the central core is
chosen from the group consisting of graphite, calcium fluoride,
diatomaceous earth, aluminum oxide, tungsten carbide, titanium
carbide, tungsten-titanium carbide, chromium carbide and chromium
oxide.
8. The process as defined in claim 7 wherein the metal coated on
said central core is nickel.
9. The process defined in claim 8 wherein the core is diatomaceous
earth and the heating step is carried out at a temperature between
1650.degree.F. and 1900.degree.F.
10. A process for producing powder particles having a central core
coated with an alloy which comprises the steps of: providing finely
divided particles of an alloying metal consisting of aluminum and
composite particles of a size within the range of 10 to 850
microns, each said composite particle having a central core coated
with a layer of material which is metallic, which is different from
the material of the core and which is capable of alloying with said
alloying metal when a mixture of said composite particles and said
alloying metal particles is heated; forming a powder mixture which
consists of said composite particles and said alloying metal
particles; and heating said powder mixture under non-oxidizing
conditions at a temperature of from about 1100.degree.F to about
1220.degree.F; and continuing said heating step for a period of
time sufficient to ensure that a required quantity of said alloying
metal diffuses into and alloys with the metal coating of the
composite particles without gross sintering taking place.
11. The process defined in claim 10 including the additional step
of mixing the alloy coated particle with a second alloying metal
and heating the resulting mixture under non-oxidizing conditions at
a temperature and for a period sufficient to ensure that said
second alloying metal forms an alloy with the alloy coating of the
composite particles without gross sintering taking place.
12. A process for producing powder particles having a central core
coated with an alloy which comprises the steps of: providing finely
divided particles of an alloying metal and composite particles of a
size within the range of 10 to 850 microns, said alloying metal
being chosen from the group consisting of chromium and a mixture of
chromium and aluminum, each said composite particle having a
central core coated with a layer of material which is metallic,
which is different from the material of the core and which is
capable of alloying with said alloying metal when a mixture of said
composite particles and said alloying metal particles is heated;
forming a powder mixture which consists of said composite
particles, a halogen-bearing compound and said alloying metal
particles; and heating said powder mixture under non-oxidizing
conditions at a temperature of from about 1650.degree.F to about
2300.degree.F; and continuing said heating step for a period of
time sufficient to ensure that a required quantity of said alloying
metal diffuses into and alloys with the metal coating of the
composite particles without gross sintering taking place.
13. A process for producing powder particles having a central core
coated with an alloy which comprises the steps of: providing finely
divided particles of an alloying metal consisting of aluminum and
composite powder particles of a size within the range of 10 to 850
microns, each said composite particle having a central core coated
with a layer of material which is metallic, which is different from
the material of the core and which is capable of alloying with said
alloying metal when a mixture of said composite particles and said
alloying metal particles is heated; forming a powder mixture which
consists of said composite particles, a halogen-bearing compound
and said alloying metal particles; and heating said powder mixture
under non-oxidizing conditions at a temperature of from about
1100.degree.F to about 1220.degree.F; and continuing said heating
step for a period of time sufficient to ensure that a required
quantity of said alloying metal diffuses into and alloys with the
metal coating of the composite particles without gross sintering
taking place.
14. A powder composition comprising non-grossly sintered particles
within the size range of 10-850 microns and each consisting
essentially of single central core chosen from the group consisting
of diatomaceous earth, graphite and calcium fluoride, a continuous
coating firmly bonded to the core, said coating comprising an alloy
in the form of a solid solution of at least two constituents, one
constituent being chosen from the group consisting of chromium and
aluminum.
15. The powder composition defined in claim 14 wherein said alloy
is in the form of a solid solution of chromium, aluminum and
another constituent.
16. The powder composition defined in claim 14 wherein said alloy
is in the form of a solid solution composed of nickel and
chromium.
17. The powder composition defined in claim 14 wherein said alloy
is in the form of a solid solution composed of nickel and
aluminum.
18. The powder composition defined in claim 14 wherein said alloy
is in the form of a solid solution composed of nickel, chromium and
aluminum.
Description
This invention relates to a process for preparing composite powders
having a metallic or non-metallic central core and a metallic alloy
layer coating the core. The invention also relates to the product
of such process.
Composite powder particles comprising a central core coated with a
mono-component metal layer are known and in commercial use in for
example the flame and plasma spraying fields, nickle-coated
graphite and nickel-coated diatomaceous earth particles are flame
sprayed to make abradable seals for turbine engines. As another
example, cobolt-coated tungsten carbide is plasma sprayed on
carving knife blades to provide a hard cutting edge which is
resistant to wear.
A variety of these powders is commercially available. They can be
made using hydrometallurgical techniques such as are described in
U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,853,398; 2,853,401; 2,853,403; 3,062,680;
3,218,192; and 3,241,949. However, these methods describe
production only of composite powders with a mono-component coating
and there is a need for composite powder particles having metal
alloy coatings on the core material because such particles, owing
to their heterogeneous nature, are capable of being formed from an
unusual combination of materials. By appropriate choice of
materials it is possible to tailor the properties of the composite
particles closely to meet the requirements of their end use. By
contrast, much less variation in properties is possible in
composite particles having a mono-component coating.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a practical
method for producing composite powder particles which have a metal
alloy coating on a metallic or non-metallic core.
It is another object to provide composite powder particles which
have central core and a metal alloy coating on the core, the
constituents of the alloy coating being substantially uniformly
distributed in one another.
It is another object to alter the properties of the mono-component
metal coating of prior art composite powders by alloying such
coating with one or more other constituents.
The method of the invention comprises: providing composite powder
particles of a size within the range of 10-850 microns each such
composite particles having a central core coated with a layer of
metal; forming a powder mixture which lacks a diluting or parting
agent and which comprises the composite particles and finely
divided particles of alloying metal chosen from the group
comprising: chromium, and aluminum, said alloying metal being
capable of alloying with the metal coating of the composite
particles when the mixture of composite particles and alloying
metal particles is heated; and heating the mixture under
non-oxidizing condition at a temperature of from about
1650.degree.F. to about 2300.degree.F where said alloying metal is
chromium and from about 1100.degree.F. to about 1220.degree.F.
where said alloying metal is aluminum, and continuing said heating
step for a period of time sufficient to ensure that a required
quantity of said alloying metal diffuses into and alloys with the
metal coating of the composite particles without gross sintering
taking place.
The specific composition of the composite powder particles used as
the starting material of the process is not important. The core
material of these particles may be any substance which can be
coated with a mono-component metal layer and which is stable at the
temperature required for the alloying step of the process. The core
material may be graphite, diatomaceous earth and refractory
materials such as aluminum oxide, tungsten carbide, titanium
carbide, tungsten-titanium carbide, chromium carbide and chromium
oxide.
Where the finished particles are to be used as abradable seals the
core material must be both abradable and erosion resistant. In
addition corrosion resistance of the core material in the
environment in which the seals are used is also required. For
example where the seals are used in turbine engines to minimize the
clearance between the compressor blades and the casing and between
the stator vanes and the rotor, the seals must be resistant to
corrosion by the turbine exhaust gases.
Because graphite oxidizes at low temperatures, its use as a core
material in alloy-coated composite particles in engine seals is
limited to engine temperatures up to about 1022.degree.F. For
higher service temperatures, composite powders having more
refractory abradable cores are required. Diatomaceous earth and
calcium fluoride are preferred for this purpose.
The metal coatings on the composite particles may be nickel,
cobolt, copper or molybdenum deposited on the core by the
hydrometallurgical methods described in the above noted patents, or
it may be another metal such as zirconium, zinc or aluminum bonded
to the core surface using a technique such as ball milling.
The starting composite particles must be within the general size
range of 10-850 microns with the precise particle size being
chiefly governed by the use to which the alloy coated product
particles are put. For example, flame-spraying processes generally
require that the feed powder be about 50-200 microns in size; on
the other hand, plasma-spraying applications usually require 10 -
50 microns size feed particles.
For most applications, the mono-component metal coating on the
starting powder particles is very thin, e.g. in the order of 10
microns or less. This is usually the case because of the
composition required for the intended application. For example,
flame sprayers of nickel-coated graphite particles specify a
graphite content of 15%. Since graphite has a low density, its
volume in comparison with the metal coating is large so the nickel
coating is relatively thin. An 85/15% by weight nickel-graphite
composite particle of 50 microns in size has a nickel coating
thickness in the order of 10 microns. As another example, plasma
sprayers use 20/80% by weight cobolt coated tungsten carbide
particles having a size of about 10 microns. These particles have a
cobalt coating about 1 micron thick.
The operability of the process of the invention is dependent on the
previously unrecognized fact that when thinly coated composite
particles are heated to a high alloying temperature in close
contact with particles of chromium or aluminum, the latter metals
will form an alloy with the coating metal. The finished product
will not be sintered at all or will be only lightly sintered so
that it can be ground or otherwise broken down to particles which
are of a size closely resembling the initial unheat-treated powder
size and which have a complete alloy coating. When a mixtuure of
fine particles of the coating metal and particles of chromium or
aluminum are heated to the same temperature however, rather than
forming an alloy the mixture will be grossly sintered. For purposes
herein the product is "grossly sintered" where it cannot be broken
down to a size closely resembling the initial unheat-treated powder
size without causing fractures to form through the particles making
up the product as opposed to between adjacent particles.
To illustrate the foregoing, if a mixture of 2 - 10 nickel and
chromium particles is heated at 1650.degree.F. for 30 minutes, a
solid mass is produced. This mass cannot be broken down short of
grinding it. If a grinding precedure is followed, the nickel and
chromium particles making up the mass are fractured so that the
original character of the powder particles is destroyed. By
contrast where a mixture of nickel-coated graphite composite
particles and chromium are heated to the same temperature, the mass
is only slightly sintered and can easily be broken down without
fracturing the chromized composite particles.
Thus a mixture of chromium or aluminum and composite particles can
be heated to a higher temperature without gross sintering taking
place than can a mixture of chromium or aluminum and particles of
the same metal as the metal which coats the composite particles.
This fact gives rise to significant results. Since at higher
temperatures, the rate of alloying is much more rapid than at lower
temperatures, the coating metal or composite particles can be
alloyed with chromium or aluminum much more quickly than can
particles of the coating metal per se which must be heated at a
lower temperature to avoid gross sintering. The marked effect which
temperature has on the rate of alloying is shown in the drawing and
is described in Example 12.
It is known that in the presence of a diluting or "parting agent"
such as alumina or magnesia, particles of the alloying metal and
particles of the coating metal per se can be heated without
sintering to temperatures which, in the absence of the parting
agent would result in gross sintering. A number of problems are
however caused by parting agents. First the agents retard the rate
at which alloying takes place and hence the time required for the
operation (the drawing illustrates the retarding effect which
magnesia has on the rate of alloying). Secondly, the agents by
definition dilute the quantity of active metal or non-metal in a
given volume of powdered mixture and accordingly there is less
transfer of the alloying metal into a substrate than from the same
volume of mixture containing no parting agents. Thirdly, the agents
must be separated from the finished alloyed particles prior to use.
In many cases, complicated and costly procedures are required to
remove the parting agents from the alloyed powder particles.
In view of the foregoing it is undesirable to use a parting agent
to prevent sintering. In the absence of a parting agent, as pointed
out before, the coating metal of composite powder particles can be
alloyed at a much faster rate than can single component particles
of the coating metal. Furnaces required for prolonged heat
treatment of single component particles are accordingly not
required where composite particles are being treated.
Binary or ternary alloy coated composite particles can be produced
by the process of the invention. For example finely divided metal
coated composite particles such as nickel-coated graphite
particles, and particles of for example chromium, can be heated at
alloying temperatures for a period of time to obtain uniform solid
state diffusion or reaction alloying. Similarly, coated composite
particles can be mixed with both chromium and aluminum and heated
to yield ternary alloy coated composite particles. Gross sintering
of the alloy coated particles does not occur. The product obtained
is either a powder or a lightly sintered cake which can be easily
broken up to provide composite alloy coated particles of
substantially the same size and shape as the starting composite
particles.
The rate of transfer of the alloying metal into the coating of the
composite powder can be greatly increased by the addition of a
small amount of halogen-bearing compound activator such as chromium
chloride, bromide or fluoride or ammonium chloride, bromide or
iodide. The temperature at which alloying of the composite powder
and alloying metal occurs is also somewhat lessened by the presence
of the activator. The compound is added to the mixture of composite
powder and alloying metal prior to the heating operation. In
general no more than 2% of the compound by weight based on the
total weight of the mixture is required for this puurpose. To
prevent contamination of the alloy coating, it is preferable that
the cation of the halogen-bearing compound be the same as one of
the metals making up the alloy coating. For example, chromium
chloride is the preferred activator when the alloying metal is
chromium. Alternatively the cation should volatilize upon
decomposition of the halogen-bearing compound e.g. NH.sub.4.
The particles of alloying metal or metals which are mixed with the
composite particles should be smaller in size than the composite
particles and preferably should be less than 50 microns. The
smaller the alloying metal particles, the faster the alloying
reaction rate, so it is desirable to utilize the smallest alloying
metal particles that are available. The alloying metal particles
must be formed of a metal which is capable of alloying quickly with
the composite particle coating metal when a mixture of the
particles is heated to alloying temperatures.
The selection of the composite powder and the alloying metal
particles is a matter of choice, depending on the properties
desired in the final alloy coated composite powder product.
However, the process of the invention is particularly effective for
alloying chromium and aluminum with nickel, cobalt or copper coated
on non-metallic core particles.
The mixing step of the invention can be carried out by any of the
known metal powder blending techniques, such as tumbling, which
ensure substantially uniform blending of the powder
constituents.
The powder mixture is heated to and maintained at alloying
temperature for a predetermined period of time selected to ensure
that the required degree of alloying occurs without appreciable
sintering. The precise heating time and temperature have to be
determined for each case although 48 hours is usually about the
maximum time that can be expended on the heating step in any case
while still providing an economically desirable process. If the
coating material of the composite particles and chromium are being
alloyed, heating should be carried out at about 1650.degree.F. to
2300.degree.F. Above 2300.degree.F. no significant increase in
alloying rate is obtained with increases in temperature and
sintering starts to become a problem.
While alloying of chromium with the coating metal will occur at
temperatures as low as 1500.degree.F. it is desirable to heat the
powder mixture to temperatures in excess of about 1650.degree.F.
Where the powder mixture is heated at temperatures below
1650.degree.F., the rate of diffusion of chromium into the coating
material increases rapidly in the initial stage of heating but then
as time passes the rate decreases and eventually virtually ceases.
Thus at these temperatures there is a maximum chromium level which
can be reached and prolonging the heat treatment will not serve to
increase this level. For many applications finished composite
particles having such a low chromium level in the coating material
are not suitable. By contrast, a much higher chromium level can be
attained where heating is conducted at temperatures of above about
1650.degree.F. By appropriate control of heating time the level of
chromium in the coating material can be adjusted within a very wide
range to suit the application intended for the finished
particles.
In the particular case of composite nickel-diatomaceous earth
particles and chromium powder alloying should preferably be
conducted at no higher than 1900.degree.F. Since at higher
temperatures the chemical constituents of the diatomaceous earth
begin to react with the metals.
In the case where nickel coated composite particles and aluminum
are being alloyed, the heating should be carried out between about
1100.degree.F. and about 1220.degree.F. Below 1100.degree.F. the
alloying reaction is too slow. Above 1220.degree.F. the aluminum
melts. From the foregoing, it is seen that each system of
components has its own requirements. The specific temperature used
in alloying has to be tailored for each system by carrying out
routine experimentation.
The heating step is carried out in any suitable furnace which
permits the provision of a protective atmosphere to avoid
oxidation. Preferably, hydrogen, having a dewpoint below
-40.degree.F. is flowed through the heating zone throughout the
alloying operation.
Where ternary alloy coated particles are being produced, the
chromium and aluminum particles may be mixed simultaneously with
particles of the composite powder before the mixture is passed to
the heating operation. Alternatively, the production of the
particles may be carried out in two stages. In the first stage, the
composite powder is mixed with one alloying metal and the mixture
is heated to effect alloying of the coating of the powder with the
alloying metal. In the second stage, finely divided particles from
the first stage are mixed with the second alloying metal and heated
as before. For example the starting composite particles may first
be mixed with particles of chromium and heated to an alloying
temperature of 1650.degree.F. to 2300.degree.F. After chromizing
has occurred, the resulting particles may be heated in contact with
aluminum particles to temperatures as high as 1400.degree.F.
The temperature within the furnace and the duration of the heating
step will depend upon the constituents of the ternary alloy coated
powder, and whether the composite powder starting material is
blended simultaneously with both alloying metals or whether each
alloying metal is blended separately with the composite powder.
In some cases, the product from the heating step is in the form of
a powder. In other cases, it is in the form of a lightly sintered
mass which can be easily comminuted to separate the chromized or
aluminized composite particles from one another.
The product of the invention comprises a plurality of particles of
a size within the range of 10-800 microns, each particle having a
central core with a firmly bonded coating of alloyed metals
attached thereto. The product particles are slightly larger but
similar in shape to the starting composite particles. Magnetic and
microprobe analysis of the alloy coating shows complete alloying of
the metal constituents in the alloy coating.
EXAMPLE 1
This example illustrates preparation of nickel-chromium coated
diatomaceous earth composite powder. The starting material for this
example was nickel coated diatomaceous earth composite powder
containing 85% nickel by weight. The powder which was prepared in
accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 3,062,680 had the following physical
characteristics.
TABLE I ______________________________________ Standard Tyler
screen analysis: Fraction Percent
______________________________________ - 48 + 100 1.6 -100 + 150
5.6 -150 + 200 13.0 -200 + 250 10.0 -250 + 325 31.4 -325 38.4
______________________________________ Apparent density: 0.83
grams/cubic centimetre Flow rate: 107.2 seconds/gram Fisher Number:
14
100 grams of the composite powder were blended with 16 grams of
commercial grade, a micron size chromium powder. The powders were
blended by manually shaking them together in a bag and then mixing
them in a highspeed blender for 2 minutes.
After blending, the powder mixture was placed in a nickel boat and
positioned in the cooling zone of an electrically heated laboratory
tube furnace. At this stage, the bed of powder was purged with
hydrogen to remove entrapped oxygen. This was done by passing
hydrogen, having a dew point of -40.degree.F. through a 21/2 inch
diameter chamber of the furnace at 11/2 cubic feet per minute for
20 minutes. The hydrogen has been pre-heated by passing it through
the hot zone of the furnace.
The boat was then moved to the hot zone of the furnace. This zone
was maintained at 1900.degree.F. Hydrogen was passed through the
zone at 11/2 cubic feet per minute. Heating was continued for 4
hours.
The boat was then returned to the cooling zone and left there for a
period of 1 hour. The boat was then removed from the furnace and
the powder mixture, in the form of a sinter cake, was broken into
pieces and placed in a high speed blender for 1 minute. It easily
broke up in the blender to a powder product having a following
physical characteristics:
TABLE II ______________________________________ Standard Tyler
screen analysis: Fraction Percent
______________________________________ - 48 + 100 8.4 -100 + 150
9.8 -150 + 200 15.4 -200 + 250 5.7 -250 + 325 18.5 -325 42.2
______________________________________ Apparent density: 1.08
grams/cubic centimetre Fisher Number: 12.1.
The coating of the product powder was examined for alloying using
electron microprobe analysis and relative ferro-magnetism testing.
The coating was found to be comprised of a uniform alloy of nickel
and chromium.
Conventional metallographic examination of a polished section of
powder particles showed that the individual particles consisted of
a core and a uniform metallic coating.
A qualitative microanalysis of the particles was carried out using
an electron microprobe and revealed that the metallic coatings were
comprised of a homogeneous mixture of chromium and nickel and the
cores were comprised of a compound containing silicon and oxygen
(diatomaceous earth).
Comparision of the ferromagnetic nature of the blend before heat
treatment and after heat treatment indicated that the heat-treated
powder was non-magnetic. Therefore the intimate mixture of chromium
and nickel in the coating was in fact a solid solution of chormium
in nickel.
Ferro-magnetism tests were carried out by first balancing the
sample weight, then determining the force of attraction to a fixed
magnetic field. Pure iron powder was used as the standard (100%).
The nickel-coated diatomaceous earth blended with chromium had
relative ferro-magnetism of 19% relative to pure iron.
The effects of time, when treating at 1900.degree.F. on the
magnetic properties of the nickel-coated diatomaceous earth and
chromium blend were studied in detail. The results shown in Tale
III indicate that alloying was taking place. The virtual
elimination of ferro-magnetism was an indication of the
completeness of the alloying reaction.
TABLE III ______________________________________ Ferromagnetism of
the blend Time (Minutes) relative to iron, %
______________________________________ 0 19 4 7.2 16 0.8 35 0.1
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 2
This example illustrates preparation of nickel-aluminum alloy
coated diatomaceous earth composite powder.
100 grams of the composite powder of Example 1 was blended with
42.5 grams of aluminum powder having a Fisher number of 28.1 and
apparent density of 0.99 grams/cubic centimetre. The blend of
powders was treated in accordance with the procedure of Example 1
with the exception that the furnace was operated at 1170.degree.F.
and the blend was heated for only 30 minutes. The screen analysis
of the product after light grinding in a mechanical blender was as
follows:
TABLE IV ______________________________________ Standard Tyler
screen analysis: Fraction Percent
______________________________________ - 48 + 100 23.9 -100 + 150
16.3 -150 + 200 18.2 -200 + 250 2.6 -250 + 325 13.5 -325 25.5
______________________________________ Apparent density: 2.13
grams/cubic centimetre
Qualitative microanalysis and ferro-magnetic comparison in
accordance with Example 1 showed that the desired complete alloying
of the aluminum and nickel was achieved.
EXAMPLE 3
This Example illustrates preparation of nickel-chromium alloy
coated graphite composite powder.
Nickel coated graphite composite powder containing 25% core
material by weight was provided. The powder had the following
physical characteristics:
TABLE V ______________________________________ Standard Tyler
screen analysis: Fraction Percent
______________________________________ - 48 + 100 0.4 -100 + 150
3.2 -150 + 200 14.4 -200 + 250 18.4 -250 + 325 38.4 -325 25.2
______________________________________ Apparent density: 1.95
grams/cubic centimetre Flow rate: 91.0 seconds/gram.
100 grams of the composite powder were blended with 18.75 grams of
the chromium powder of Example 1. The blend of powders was treated
in accordance with the procedure of Example 1 with the exception
that the furnace was operated at 2200.degree.F. and the blend was
heated for 16 hours.
No screen analysis was carried out on the powder product. However,
qualitative microanalysis and ferro-magnetic comparison in
accordance with Example 1 showed that the desired alloying of
chromium and nickel was achieved.
EXAMPLE 4
This Example illustrates preparation of nickel-chromium alloy
coated boron nitride composite powder.
Hydrometallurgically produced, nickel-coated boron nitride
composite powder containing 48% by weight of the core material was
provided. The powder had the following physical
characteristics:
TABLE VI ______________________________________ Standard Tyler
screen analysis: Fraction Percent
______________________________________ +150 56.0 -150 + 170 4.0
-170 + 200 1.6 -200 + 250 0.8 -250 + 270 1.6 -270 36.0
______________________________________ Apparent density: 1.17
grams/cubic centimetre
200 grams of the composite powder were blended with 29.2 grams of
the chromium powder of Example 1. The blend of powders was treated
in accordance with the procedure of Example 1 with the exception
that the furnace was operated at 1900.degree.F. and the blend was
heated for 38 hours.
Qualitative microanalysis and ferro-magnetic comparison in
accordance with Example 1 showed that the desired alloying of
chromium and nickel was achieved.
EXAMPLE 5
This Example illustrates preparation of cobalt-chromium alloy
coated tungsten carbide powder.
Hydrometallurgically produced cobalt coated tungsten carbide
composite powder containing 80% core material by weight was
provided. The powder had the following physical
characteristics:
TABLE VII ______________________________________ Buckbee Mears
screen analysis (in microns): Fraction Percent
______________________________________ + 44 0.0 -44 + 30 7.0 -30 +
20 30.0 -20 + 10 43.0 -10 + 5 10.0 - 5 10.0
______________________________________ Apparent density: 4.54
grams/cubic centimetre Fisher Number 12.7.?
100 grams of the composite powder were blended with 5 grams of
commercial grade, 8 micron size chromium powder using the procedure
described in Example 1.
After blending, the powder was treated in accordance with the
procedure of Example 1 with the exception that the heating was
continued for 21.5 hours at 1900.degree.F. The coating of the
product powder was examined using electron microprobe analysis and
relative ferro-magnetism. Comparison of the ferro-magnetic nature
of the blend before heat treatment and after heat treatment
indicated that the heat treated powder was substantially less
magnetic indicating that the intimate mixture of chromium and
cobalt in the coating was in fact a solid solution of chromium in
cobalt.
EXAMPLE 6
This Example illustrates preparation of nickel-chromium coated
calcium fluoride composite powder. The starting material for this
example was nickel calcium fluoride composite powder containing 75%
by weight nickel. The powder was prepared in accordance with U.S.
Pat. No. 3,062,680 and had the following physical
characteristics.
TABLE VIII ______________________________________ Standard Tyler
screen analysis: Fraction Percent
______________________________________ - 48 + 100 1.8 -100 + 150
9.3 -150 + 200 5.6 -200 + 250 18.0 -250 + 325 19.5 -325 45.8
______________________________________ Apparent density: 1.20
grams/cubic centimetre.
100 grams of the composite powder were blended with 19 grams of
commercial grade, 8 micron size chromium powder. The powders were
blended by manually shaking them together in a bottle.
After blending, the powder mixture was heat treated as in Example 1
except that heating was continued in the hot zone of the furnace
for 16 hours.
The powder was removed from the furnace and was observed to be in
the form of a sinter cake. The cake was easily broken into pieces
and was pulverized in a high speed blender to yield a finely
divided powder substantially 100% - 100 mesh in size.
The coating of the product powder was examined for alloying and
relative ferro-magnetism and was found to be comprised of a uniform
alloy of nickel and chromium.
Conventional metallographic examination of a polished section of
powder particles showed that the individual particles consisted of
a core and a uniform metallic coating.
Comparison of the ferro-magnetic nature of the blend before and
after heat treatment indicated that the heat-treated powder was
non-magnetic. Thus the intimate mixture of chromium and nickel in
the coating was in fact a solid solution of chromium in nickel.
EXAMPLE 7
This Example illustrates the preparation of a composite powder
composed of a diatomaceous earth core with a ternary alloy. The
elements making up the ternary alloy are nickel, chromium and
aluminum.
A composite powder having a diatomaceous earth core encased in a
nickel-aluminum coating was used as the starting material. The
composite powder was prepared in accordance with the procedure
described in Example 2 except that the temperature within the
furnace was 1200.degree.F. and the heat treatment was continued for
11/2 hours. Following the heat treatment, the nickel-aluminum
coated diatomaceous earth particles were removed from the furnace
and placed in a high speed blender to break the particles down into
a finely divided powder. 100 grams of the powder was blended with
16 grams of commercial grade 8 micron size chromium powder and heat
treated in the manner described in Example 1 except that the
temperature within the furnace was maintained at 1800.degree.F. and
the heat treatment was continued for 16 hours. The heat treated
particles were broken down as above to yield a composite powder
composed of a diatomaceous earth core coated with a
nickel-chromium-aluminum alloy.
The effect of the above described treatment on the magnetic
properties are set out in the following table.
TABLE IX ______________________________________ Ferromagnetism
Material (Iron 100%) ______________________________________ Pure
Nickel reference 31.5 % Blend of Nickel coated Diatomaceous earth
plus aluminum: Before heat treatment 22.8 % After heat treatment
7.7 % Blend of Diatomaceous earth core coated with nickel aluminum
alloy plus chromium: Before heat treatment 7.6 % After heat
treatment .01% ______________________________________
The negligible ferro-magnetism of the heat treated blend of
chromium and the composite powder composed of a diatomaceous earth
core and a nickel aluminum alloy coating indicates the virtually
complete formation of the ternary alloy around the diatomaceous
earth core particles.
EXAMPLE 8
This Example illustrates the improvement in the rate of transfer of
the alloying metal into the coating of the composite powder caused
by the addition of a vaporizable halide prior to heat treatment. In
the first test, hydrated chromium chloride was blended with a
mixture of chromium and composite powder. In each case, the
resulting mixture contained approximately 81.8% by weight composite
powder, 16.2% by weight chromium and 2.0% by weight hydrated
chromium chloride. The mixtures were heat treated at various
temperatures and for varying lengths of time in purified hydrogen.
The degree of alloying as well as the relative ferro-magnetism were
determined according to the procedures outlined in Example 1. The
results are summarized in the following table X.
TABLE X
__________________________________________________________________________
82 Nickel/Diato- Powder 75 Nickel/Graphite 25 maceous earth 8
Coarse Cr Medium Cr Coarse Cr Chromium (40 microns) (8 microns) (40
microns) Additive CrCl.sub.3 Nil CrCl.sub.3 Nil CrCl.sub.3 Nil
Temperature Time % Cr/rel- % Cr/ % Cr/ % Cr/ % Cr/ % Cr/ .degree.F
hr ative Ferro- rel. rel. rel. rel. rel. magnetism fer. fer. fer.
fer. fer.
__________________________________________________________________________
1800 20 10.9/ 3.81 3 /10.6 15 /10.0 4.5/10.7 4 9.5/ 2.76 3 /14.4
7.4/ 3.1 2.6/29.0 1 8.5/ 1.6 2.6/15 8.5/ 1.3 2.8/31 16.1/ 0.51 2.3
1.2 0.5 10.0/ 1.80 2.6/24.7 7.0/ 1.60 1 /28.3 1650 0.5 7 / 5.50 1
/35.0 9 / 2.60 0 /33.6 1500 18 4.5/ 7.30 10.9/ 0.87 16 12.2/ 1.17
1.6/32.3 2 5 /10.10 7 / 2.96 13.6/ 0.61 0.0/34.9 1.25 6.2/ 5.14 7 /
4.70 0.5 5.4/ 8.13 1 /30.4 5.4/ 8.60 0.6/35.5 1300 64 2.4/11.3
2.0/26.0 5.0/ 2.2 4 0.0/14.5 1.5/11.5 / 5.1 2 2.4/19.0 1.5/11.48
0.5 6.2/19.6 12.8/15.8 12.2/10.0 0 0 n.d./34.7 n.d./35.0 n.d./35.0
n.d./36.3 n.d./38
__________________________________________________________________________
It is apparent from the results tabulated above that in every case
the addition of chromium chloride dramatically increases the
diffusion rate of chromium in the nickel coating of the composite
powder. Substantial diffusion at temperatures as low as
1300.degree.F. occurs. Further tests establish that the time
required to achieve a given amount of alloying in a sample
containing CrCl.sub.3 and heat treated at the same temperature is
significantly less than for a sample containing no CrCl.sub.3 and
heat treated at the same temperature.
The effect of the presence of ammonium chloride on the diffusion
rate of the alloying metal in the coating of composite powder was
also treated. Deoxidized 75 nickel/graphite 25 composite powder was
blended with chromium powder and ammonium chloride. The blend
analyzed 82.5% by weight 75 Ni/C25, 16.3% by weight Cr and 1.2%
NH.sub.4 Cl. The blend was heated for 30 minutes at 1800.degree.F.
then analyzed. About 10% of the chromium was alloyed with the
nickel coating and the relative ferro-magnetism was 5.3%.
EXAMPLE 9
This example illustrates the preparation of nickel-chromium coated
titanium carbide powder.
4500 grams of composite powder (NI 20.9%, TiC 79.1%) were blended
with 225 grams of chromium powder having an average size of 8
microns and 11 grams of chromium chloride.
The powder mixture was placed in a nickel boat and positioned in
the cooling zone of an electrically-heated laboratory tube furnace.
The powder was purged with hydrogen for 30 minutes to remove
entrapped oxygen. The hydrogen had been preheated by passing it
through the hot zone of the furnace.
The boat was then moved to the hot zone of the furnace. This zone
was maintained at 1900.degree.F. Hydrogen was passed through the
zone at 11/2 cubic feet per minute. Heating was continued for 4
hours.
The boat was then returned to the cooling zone and left there for a
period of 1 hour following which the boat was removed from the
furnace. It was found that the powder was present in the form of a
sinter cake.
The screen analysis of the product after light grinding in a
mechanical blender was as follows:
TABLE XI ______________________________________ Powder Size in
Microns Fraction Percent ______________________________________ +44
7.1 -44 +30 25.0 -30 +20 40.0 -20 +10 18.6 -10 +5 7.4 -5 1.9
______________________________________ Apparent density: 1.86
grams/cubic centimetre
Qualitative microanalysis and ferro-magnetic comparison in
accordance with Example 1 showed that the desired complete alloying
of chromium and nickel had been achieved.
EXAMPLE 10
This example illustrates the preparation of nickel-chromium coated
chromium carbide powder.
4770 grams of powder (Ni 16%, Cr.sub.3 C.sub.2 84%) were blended
with 258 grams of chromium powder (average size 8 microns) and 50
grams of CrCl.sub.3. The blend of powders were treated in
acccordance with the procedure of Example 9.
The screen analysis of the product after light grinding in a
mechanical blender was as follows:
Fraction screen analysis:
TABLE XII ______________________________________ Fraction Percent
______________________________________ -200 +250 2.3 -250 +325 76.2
-325 +400 21.5 ______________________________________ Apparent
density: 2.78 grams/cubic centimetre
Qualitative microanalysis and ferro-magnetic comparison in
accordance with Example 1 showed that the desired complete alloying
of the aluminum and nickel had been achieved.
EXAMPLE 11
This example illustrates the preparation of nickel-chromium and
nickel-chromium-aluminum coated tungsten-titanium carbide
powders.
800 gms of Ni/WTiC.sub.2 (15/85) were blended with 25 gms of fine
chromium powder (average particle size about 8 microns) and 8 gms
of CrCl.sub.3 powder. The blend was placed in a covered boat and
purged in the cold zone of a muffle furnace. The blend was purged
with dry hydrogen for 30 min. Following this the blend was heated
for 21/2 hours at 1950.degree.F. in a dry hydrogen atmosphere and
then cooled to room temperature.
The blend was found to have sintered lightly, but was easily broken
up into powder. Most of the powder passed through a 250 mesh screen
and was found to be satisfactory for plasma spraying. An
experimental plasma spray coating was found to have D.P.H.
microhardness of 1290.
A sample of the nickel-chromium coated tungsten-titanium carbide
powder was further treated to produce a more complex oxidation
resistant composite powder.
400 gms of the NiCr/WTiC.sub.2 powder was blended with 5 gms of
fine leafing-grade aluminum. The blend was treated in a similar
manner as above with the exception that the heating temperature was
1400.degree.F. and the heating time was 1 hour.
The resultant powder was found to be satisfactory for plasma
spraying. An experimental plasma spray coating of the
NiCrAl/WTiC.sub.2 powder had D.P.H. microhardness of 950.
EXAMPLE 12
This Example illustrates the marked effect which temperature has on
the rate at which the alloying metal diffuses into and becomes
alloyed with the coating material of the composite particles. The
starting material was nickel-coated diatomaceous earth containing
88% nickel by weight. A powder mixture was prepared by blending the
starting material with chromium powder (Fisher No. 14) to a
composition of 4 parts Ni, 1 part Cr. Part of the mixture was
blended with a magnesia parting agent to produce first and second
samples, the first containing 10% MgO and the second containing 25%
MgO (by weight). Third sample contained no parting agent. 1/2% by
weight CrCl.sub.3 activator was combined with each sample.
The samples were subjected to various heat treatments and the
amount of chromium in the nickel coating was determined at various
times during the treatments by following the shift in the 220 line
according to the standard XRD technique. The accuracy of this
technique is about .+-. 1%. The results are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2
of the drawing.
At 1500.degree.F. in the sample containing no parting agent there
is an initial fairly rapid increase in chromium level of the nickel
coating followed by a more gradual increase followed thereafter by
negligible or no increase in the chromium level. In samples
containing parting agent there is a much less rapid increase in the
chromium level of the nickel coating to only 2% followed by no
increase even after 64 hours of heat treatment.
At 1830.degree.F. the rate of chromizing without a parting agent is
much more rapid than at 1500.degree.F. Furthermore the level of
chromium in the nickel coating in the absence of a parting agent
increases with heating time and does not reach a maximum at the
same point in time as does the chromium level in the sample heated
at 1500.degree.F.
Both at 1830.degree.F. and at 1500.degree.F. the rate of chromizing
is greatly influenced by the level of parting agent in the sample.
Not only is the chromizing rate greatly retarded by magnesia but
the magnesia appears to impose a maximum level of chromium in the
nickel coating.
EXAMPLE 13
This example illustrates the effect of heat treatment on various
powder mixtures. Samples were prepared as follows:
1 - a blend of iron and chromium powders (80% Fe, 20% Cr) and 2%
ammonium fluoride.
2 - a blend of nickel and chromium powders (80% Fe, 20% Cr) and 2%
NH.sub.4 F.
3 - a blend of nickel and aluminum powders (67% Ni, 33% Al)
4 - the same as Sample 3 except that 10% by weight MgO was added to
the blend
5 - a blend of nickel-coated diatomaceous earth composite
particles, aluminum particles (67% Ni/De; 33% Al) and 1/2%
CrCl.sub.3.
The five samples were heated under the conditions specified below
and the resulting products were examined for degrees of sintering.
The extent of alloying was also checked in products which were not
grossly sintered. The results are set out in the following
table:
TABLE XIII ______________________________________ Condition of
Sample Heating Conditions heated product
______________________________________ 1. (Fe + Cr) 1650.degree.F.
for 20 minutes grossly sintered 2. (Ni + Cr) 1650.degree.F. for 20
minutes grossly sintered 3. (Ni + Al) 1100.degree.F. for 1 hour
grossly sintered in presence of H.sub.2 4. (Ni + Al 1100.degree.F.
for 1 hour no sintering; no +MgO) in presence of H.sub.2 alloying
5. (Ni/De + 1100.degree.F. for 1 hour no sintering; Al) in presence
of H.sub.2 extensive alloying
______________________________________
The results show that when single component particles are mixed
with chromium and aluminum particles and are heated to the lowest
temperature recommended for chromizing and aluminizing according to
the subject process, gross sintering occurs. Where a parting agent
(MgO) is added to the mixture containing aluminum particles, gross
sintering does not take place but, on the other hand, aluminizing
also does not occur. By contrast where a mixture of composite
particles and aluminum are heated under the same conditions
alloying occurs. The results of Example 12 show that the same is
also true of chromium containing mixtures.
* * * * *