U.S. patent number 3,913,290 [Application Number 05/478,844] was granted by the patent office on 1975-10-21 for fire insulation edge reinforcements for structural members.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Avco Corporation. Invention is credited to Rudolph W. Billing, George K. Castle.
United States Patent |
3,913,290 |
Billing , et al. |
October 21, 1975 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
Fire insulation edge reinforcements for structural members
Abstract
Fire insulation reinforcements protect structural members from
exceedingly high temperatures during fires. The reinforcements are
supported on the flange sections of structural members as well as
flat surfaces to effectively hold the fireproofing coating in place
during fires so as to better insulate the flat surfaces and outer
edges from damage during fires.
Inventors: |
Billing; Rudolph W. (Littleton,
MA), Castle; George K. (Chelmsford, MA) |
Assignee: |
Avco Corporation (Cincinnati,
OH)
|
Family
ID: |
27037333 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/478,844 |
Filed: |
June 13, 1974 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
454077 |
Mar 25, 1974 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
52/347; 52/454;
52/647; 52/515; 52/841; 52/834 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E04B
1/943 (20130101); Y10T 442/109 (20150401); Y10T
442/2648 (20150401); Y10T 428/24999 (20150401); Y10T
428/31678 (20150401); Y10S 428/921 (20130101); Y10S
428/92 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E04B
1/94 (20060101); E04F 013/06 (); E04C
003/293 () |
Field of
Search: |
;52/232,729,515,516,443,454,661,647,676,231,334,414,344,347
;161/403 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,856 |
|
Mar 1929 |
|
CH |
|
551,262 |
|
Mar 1923 |
|
FR |
|
Other References
Architectural Engineering pp. 161 -163 Tomasetti, "New Approach to
the Fire Protection of Steel," Sept., 1972..
|
Primary Examiner: Purser; Ernest R.
Assistant Examiner: Braun; Leslie A.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hogan, Esq.; Charles M. Ogman,
Esq.; Abraham
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation-in-part of our copending U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 454,077, filed Mar. 25, 1974, now
abandoned.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. In combination with a structural member having flange portions
terminating in an edge susceptible of receiving heat from three
directions, a fire insulation structure comprising:
insulation means secured in an abutting relationship to said edge,
the insulation means having thickness equal to the thickness of
said edge and a depth greater than the thickness of said edge;
and
a mesh means around the periphery of said insulation means, said
mesh means having leg portions extending beyond the insulation
means, said leg portions being engageable with the flange portions
of the structural member to secure said insulation means in an
abutting relationship with the edge of the flange wherein a
fireproof coating is applied over the entire structural member and
mesh means thereby substantially reducing the amount of heat flow
directed to the end and edges of the flange during fire
conditions.
2. The structure set forth in claim 1 in which said mesh means is a
wire mesh wherein said wire mesh holds the fireproofing coating
together all around the edge and flange as the coating
decomposes.
3. The structure as set forth in claim 2 further comprising an edge
member secured to the exterior of said wire mesh and insulation
means so as to provide an easily fireproofable edge surface for the
structural member.
4. The structure defined in claim 2 wherein said structural member
includes a flange terminating in said end and edge to which the
insulation is secured.
5. The structure as set forth in claim 4 in which the leg portions
of said wire mesh frictionally engage opposite surfaces of the
portions flange thereby holding said insulation means in place
against the flange edge.
6. In a combination with a structural member having an end
terminating in an edge susceptible of receiving heat from three
directions, and having a fireproof coating over its entire surface,
a fire insulation structure comprising:
insulation means interposed between the fireproof coating and said
edge in an abutting relationship to said edge, the insulation means
having a thickness equal to the thickness of said edge, and a depth
greater than the thickness of said edge, wherein said insulation
reducing the amount of heat flow directed to said edge.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to fire protective coatings and
more particularly to a wire mesh and fireproof coating to provide a
fire insulation reinforcement for structural members.
Structural members, such as steel beams, walls, containers and the
like, are often fireproofed with coatings to protect against the
heat produced in an unplanned fire. Without this protection, the
member would soon reach temperature levels where the accompanying
loss in strength will result in the structural member failing under
load. Most construction structural members have flange edges such
as "I" beams, "H" beams, channels and angles. These edges are the
most difficult parts of the member to protect against heating
because the flow of heat from the fire comes in three directions
(top, bottom, and perpendicular to the edge) instead of the two
directions possible on flat planar surfaces. The flow of heat is
represented in FIG. 1 by the arrows.
Some thin coatings presently used for fire protection are
intumescent in nature. These coatings swell into a carbonaceous
foam when heated which insulates against the fire. However, during
fires these materials may lose their bonding properties and
sections of the material may fall from the member thereby exposing
the bare member to the fire. This type of coating poses even
greater problems in providing protection to the edge member because
the intumescence takes place in only one direction, i.e.,
perpendicular to the coated surface and thus large cracks or
fissures are likely to occur in the foamed material at the edges of
the steel flanges. No lateral intumescence really occurs and when
the foam intumesces outward, the surface area does not change,
forcing fissures to occur at the surface.
The primary method used for steel member edge protection has
traditionally been to cover the edges with sufficient coating
material to overcome the problem. Often during fire tests (ASTM
E-119) of such protection systems, the temperature level recorded
in the edges of the test specimen was the highest, and hence
controlled the length of the test.
It is very difficult to apply extra fireproofing material to the
edges of structural members whether the material is cast into place
(concrete) or sprayed in place (cementitious mixtures, fibers, or
intumescent mastics). The reason is because of the inconvenience of
the shapes involved (casting) and the difficulty of building up a
localized thin strip (spraying) along the edge. Rather, the
practice has been to uniformly apply more material to the entire
perimeter of the structural shape to insure that the edges are
protected. A disadvantage of this method is that it causes more
material to be used than necessary, increases weight, and increases
costs (both material and spray time).
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide fire
insulation reinforcements which will provide reliable thermal
protection to structural members, be easy to apply, and thoroughly
reinforce the entire fireproofing coating both in the virgin state
and during a fire when the intumesced char layer forms.
A further object of this invention is to provide an insulated edge
reinforcement which gives better thermal performance of fireproofed
structural members in a fire.
A still further object of this invention is to provide insulated
reinforcements which permit reduced overall coating thickness and
waste through eliminating overspray from trying to build up
fireproofing coating thicknesses on the edges of the flanges.
And yet another object of this invention is to provide an insulated
reinforcement which increases reliability and safety through the
reinforcement of the fireproofing coating thereby preventing early
bonding failures of the fireproofing material in a fire.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention provides an insulated reinforcement for use on
structural members. The reinforcement is supported on the
structural member and the fireproofing material placed thereabout
so as to protect and insulate the surface and respective edges of
the members from damage due to heat during unplanned fires. The
reinforcement secures an insulation strip against the end of the
structural flange. Fireproofing material is applied over the mesh
and insulation strip in a thickness sufficient to protect the
flanges and webs of the structural member.
Other objects, details, uses and advantages of this invention will
become apparent as the following description of the exemplary
embodiments thereof presented in the accompanying drawings
proceeds.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings show present exemplary embodiments of
this invention in which:
FIG. 1 is a fragmentary perspective view of a structural I-beam
showing the direction of beam heat;
FIG. 2 is a fragmentary perspective view of one embodiment of the
insulated edge reinforcement of this invention;
FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 2 showing a precast edge
reinforcement;
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary end view showing means for securing an open
leg insulated edge reinforcement to a structural member;
FIG. 5 is a chart showing the comparison of edge temperatures
versus flange center and web temperatures resulting from the use of
this invention;
FIGS. 6-9 show other exemplary embodiments of this invention
particularly showing alternate shape configurations;
FIG. 10 is a fragmentary perspective of a flat surface, such as a
wall, having the fire insulation reinforcement of this invention
secured thereto; and
FIG. 11 is a sectional view taken along line 11--11 of FIG. 10.
DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS
Reference is now made to FIG. 1 of the drawings which illustrates a
typical structural member 10, such as a structural steel I-beam. It
is seen that the I-beam 10 includes a plurality of flange sections
12 having end edges 14 and 16. As previously indicated, the
direction of the flow of heat from a fire is indicated by the
arrows. It can be seen that the web 11 and flange 12 each have
two-directional heating, i.e., perpendicular to the structural
surfaces. The end or edge of the flange 12 is seen to have
three-dimensional heating, the third direction being perpendicular
to the edge of the flange.
The insulated edge reinforcement system 20 is shown in two basic
forms in FIGS. 2 and 3. The FIG. 3 form has a precast edge of
coating material or a steel edge and the FIG. 2 form does not. Both
forms perform the same functions, however.
Referring now to FIG. 2, the edge reinforcement 20 is constructed
of a meshlike member such as wire mesh 18. The wire mesh 18 is
formed in a press brake or similar machine to the shape required
for the member to be protected. Welded wire mesh is preferred and
may either be with or without galvanizing. The mesh size may be any
suitable opening from one-fourth inch to 1 inch or greater. The
wire diameter should be small enough to reduce cost and permit easy
forming, but large enough to hold the formed shape firmly. One edge
reinforcement having excellent fireproofing capabilities was
constructed of one-half inch mesh and 19 gauge wire.
Sheet insulation 22 is sliced or cut into strips and laid into the
formed wire mesh 18. Any suitable fibrous insulation such as U.S.
Gypsum Thermafiber may be used. It is noted that board insulations
will also work. A practical limit on the thermal conductivity for
the insulation used is approximately 0.2 Btu/ft-hr-.degree.F. The
size of the insulation strip 22 is preferably at least twice the
flange 12 thickness in depth and preferably at least equal to the
flange thickness in thickness.
In the precast form of FIG. 3, the formed wire 18A with the
insulation 22A in place is placed edge first into a mold (not
shown) containing the casting material. The edge reinforcement 20A
is left in the mold until hardening of the edge material 24 occurs.
The reinforcement with the precast edge 24 is then stripped from
the mold and is ready for shipping and installation. For some
cases, a metal edge 24 may be stapled or welded on the
reinforcement 20A in place of the precast edge.
The reinforcements 20 may be made with either open legs or closed
legs during the forming operation. The legs are considered as that
part of the wire mesh which extends inwardly from the flange edge
to the web. If a closed leg form is used, the insulated
reinforcement 20 is merely slipped over the flange by hand after
slightly spreading the legs apart. It is held in place on the
flange by the spring tension in the wire legs until the
fireproofing coating is sprayed over the system. If the open leg
form is used, the reinforcement 20 is slipped on the flange and a
crimping tool 26 is used to tighten the wire against the flange
surface as shown in FIG. 4.
The crimping tool 26 is seen to comprise a pair of forcing members
or handles 28 and 30 pivotally connected together at 32. The handle
28 includes an outer peripheral shoulder 34 and a vertically
projecting shoulder 36. The peripheral shoulder 34 acts against one
leg of the wire mesh 18 and holds the mesh 18 against the flange
12. The shoulder 36 abuts against the precast edge 24 along the
exterior side of the insulation strips 22. One end or shoulder 38
of the handle 30 engages the opposite leg of the wire mesh 18.
Thus, when the handles 28 and 30 are pressed or forced together,
force is applied through the shoulders 34 and 38 to bend the open
legs of the wire mesh 18 into a clamping condition relative to the
flange 12.
After the insulated reinforcement 20 is in place, any suitable
fireproofing material (not shown) is applied over the reinforcement
20 in a thickness which is sufficient to protect the flanges and
webs of the structural member 10. These thicknesses are in practice
determined by actual fire tests (i.e., ASTM E-119). However, the
edges 14-16 of the reinforced flange do not now have to be built up
in thickness; they merely have to be covered with enough material
to produce a neat continuous coating.
If an unplanned fire should occur, the insulated reinforcement 20
works in the following manner. First of all, the presence of the
insulation 22 inside the wire mesh 18 retards the perpendicular
flow of heat into the edge of the flange 12, thus keeping it cooler
for a longer period of time. The wire mesh 18 itself holds the
fireproofing material together all around the edges 14-16 and
flange 12 as the material decomposes, intumesces, etc. This is
especially important since the steel primers and paints which the
coatings are applied over usually lose their bonding strength at
temperature levels far below that which the steel itself may be
safely allowed to reach, approximately 1000.degree.F. In the
presence of bonding strength failure, the fireproofing material has
nothing holding it onto the steel except its own structural
integrity. The wire reinforcement 18 provides this integrity if
needed.
Finally, if an intumescent coating is used, there is a very high
possibility of fissures and cracks forming at the edges of the
flanges and uncovering bare steel. Should this happen, up to a 30
percent increase in heat flux into the flange may occur if only 1
percent of the steel surface is exposed. However, with the
reinforcement member 20, instead of these fissures uncovering bare
steel in this area, only the insulation 22 will be exposed and the
heat transfer to the edge of the steel flange will be many times
less than if the steel itself were exposed. Naturally, this permits
much better fire performance of the overall coating system. Another
advantage of the mesh 18 is that if fissures form on the flange
surfaces, they will stop when the wire mesh 18 is reached. The
material under the mesh swells beneath it and provides some
protection to the steel directly below the fissure.
FIG. 5 represents a comparison of the edge temperature versus the
flange center and web temperatures using the edge reinforcement of
this invention. In this test, a 10WF49 beam was reinforced as
hereinabove described and coated with an intumescent fire
protective coating developed at Avco Systems Division, in Lowell,
Mass., and marketed under the name AVCO FM 59. The test was run in
an environment in which the furnace temperature was 1950.degree.F.,
the radiant heat flux was 16.2 Btu/ft.sup.2 -sec. and the
convective heat flux was 1-2 Btu/ft.sup.2 -sec. Temperatures were
measured in the web, flange web joint and at the edges of the top
and bottom flanges and are respectively designated on the chart by
triangle, square, circle and hexagon. The effectiveness of the edge
reinforcement protection is demonstrated by the overall fire
performance of the beam and by the fact that the beam remained
fairly uniform in temperature distribution throughout the test. The
edges, therefore, were successfully afforded the same protection as
the rest of the beam.
Referring now to FIGS. 6-9, it is seen that the edge reinforcement
member of this invention may be formed in varying shapes depending
on the desired end use. Different wire meshes may be employed, as
well as different types of insulation. The insulation can be placed
on the edge of the flange by any suitable means such as contact
cement and the wire slipped over the insulation later. If a precast
or metal edge is used, the type of material can be varies as long
as it bonds well to the fireproofing material which is applied over
it. The actual shape of the wire mesh will depend on the end
use.
As particularly seen in FIG. 6, the wire mesh 18B is seen to be
formed in a T-shape over the end of the insulation 22. FIG. 7 shows
the T-shape wire mesh 18B being utilized with a precast edge or
metal edge 24B. The edge 24B conforms to the T end of the wire mesh
18B and is held thereby.
FIG. 8 represents another embodiment in which the wire mesh 18C is
formed with an enlarged or bulb portion 40. The purpose of the bulb
is to permit firm anchoring of a maximum amount of fireproofing
material under the mesh near the flange edge.
The embodiment of FIG. 9 is very similar to the FIG. 2 embodiment.
The difference in this instance is that the wire mesh 18D is formed
with surface standoff dimples 42. Thus, when the mesh 18D is placed
over the flange, the dimples 42 will engage the flange with the
majority of the wire mesh 18 being supported away from the surface
of the flange. This permits better anchoring of the fireproofing
material under the mesh.
The fire insulation reinforcement of this invention is also
applicable for use on large flat surfaces such as walls, large
cylindrical containers and the like. Referring now to FIGS. 10 and
11, a fragmentary view of a wall 44 is seen to be fire protected by
a fire insulation reinforcement designated generally as 46. The
fire insulation reinforcement 46 is formed in the same manner as
previously described. In the case where large walls or the like are
to be protected, the wire mesh 48 is mechanically attached to the
wall by any suitable means. As an example, if the wall 44 is of
steel plate, the wire mesh 48 may be secured thereto by spot welds
50. If the member will not support a weld, suitable means, such as
support pins or the like, may be utilized to support the wire mesh
in place. The fireproof coating 52 is then applied over the wire
mesh 48 such that the wire mesh is in effect encased in the
fireproof material 52. Hence, if a fire should occur the material
52 will intumesce. When the material intumesces, the fireproofing
material very often will lose the bonding capabilities it has with
the structural member. In addition, fissures may occur in the
material. If the wire mesh 48 was not used, sections of the fire
protective material might fall off thereby exposing the structural
member. However, the wire mesh 48 holds the fireproofing material
52 in place even though the material has lost its bonding effect.
Similarly, if a fissure should develop, the fissure would be
stopped in the wire mesh level and would not extend to the
structural member.
It is seen that the fireproof reinforcements of this invention
overcome the disadvantages of prior methods of fireproofing
structural members. The fireproof reinforcement of this invention
is simple in structure, easily applied to the flange portions and
provides effective fireproofing when used with the fireproofing
material, such as intumescent coatings and the like. Accordingly,
it is seen that the objectives hereinbefore set forth have been
accomplished.
While present exemplary embodiments of this invention have been
illustrated and described, it will be recognized that this
invention may be otherwise variously embodied and practiced by
those skilled in the art.
* * * * *