U.S. patent number 3,904,401 [Application Number 05/453,352] was granted by the patent office on 1975-09-09 for corrosion resistant austenitic stainless steel.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Carpenter Technology Corporation. Invention is credited to Robert L. Caton, David L. Mertz.
United States Patent |
3,904,401 |
Mertz , et al. |
September 9, 1975 |
Corrosion resistant austenitic stainless steel
Abstract
An austenitic stainless steel containing 0.25 percent Max.
carbon, 15-20 percent manganese, 1% Max. silicon, 16-22 percent
chromium, 3 percent Max. nickel, 0.5-3 percent molybdenum, 0.5-2
percent copper, 0.2-0.8 percent nitrogen, and the balance iron
which in its annealed condition is substantially fully austenitic
and is capable of an ultimate tensile strength in its annealed
condition of about 125 ksi, and which can be cold worked to
strength levels in excess of 200 ksi in which condition it is
substantially fully austenitic and nonmagnetic.
Inventors: |
Mertz; David L. (Fleetwood,
PA), Caton; Robert L. (Reading, PA) |
Assignee: |
Carpenter Technology
Corporation (Reading, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
23800242 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/453,352 |
Filed: |
March 21, 1974 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
420/42; 420/57;
148/327 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C22C
38/44 (20130101); C22C 38/60 (20130101); C22C
38/58 (20130101); C22C 38/42 (20130101); C22C
38/02 (20130101); C22C 38/38 (20130101); C22C
38/001 (20130101); C22C 38/22 (20130101); C22C
38/18 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C22C
38/38 (20060101); C22c 039/26 (); C22c 039/48 ();
C22c 039/54 () |
Field of
Search: |
;148/38
;75/125,126B,126C,126L,126M,126J,128A,128P,128N,128W |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
"Prop. Relationships of Some Cast and Forged G-Mn-Ni-N.sub.2 Steels
Containing 18% Cr," Haefner et al., 62nd ASTM Meeting,
6/59..
|
Primary Examiner: Rutledge; L. Dewayne
Assistant Examiner: Steiner; Arthur J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Jay; Edgar N.
Claims
We claim:
1. A corrosion resistant austenitic stainless steel alloy which is
substantially fully austenitic and nonmagnetic in its annealed
condition and in its cold worked condition, consisting essentially
in weight percent of about
the balance being essentially iron and incidental impurities, in
which up to 0.75 percent selenium can be substituted for all or
part of the sulfur, and in which tungsten can be substituted for
all or part of the molybdenum in the proportion of 1.5 percent
tungsten for 1 percent molybdenum.
2. The alloy as set forth in claim 1, in which copper is limited to
no more than about 1 percent when the amount of manganese present
is greater than about 18 percent.
3. The alloy as set forth in claim 1 containing about 0.4-0.65
percent nitrogen.
4. The alloy as set forth in claim 3 containing about 16-19 percent
manganese.
5. The alloy as set forth in claim 4 containing about 17-19 percent
chromium.
6. The alloy as set forth in claim 5 containing about 0.05-0.15
percent carbon, no more than about 1 percent nickel, no more than
about 1.5 percent molybdenum, and no more than about 1.5 percent
copper.
7. The alloy as set forth in claim 6 containing no more than about
1 percent copper when the amount of manganese exceeds about 18
percent.
8. The alloy as set forth in claim 7 containing no more than about
0.55 percent nitrogen.
9. A corrosion resistant austenitic stainless steel alloy which is
substantially fully austenitic and nonmagnetic in its annealed
condition and which has a room temperature ultimate tensile
strength of at least about 120,000 psi in its annealed condition,
said alloy consisting essentially in weight percent of about
the balance essentially iron and incidental impurites with no more
than 1 percent silicon, no more than 0.03 percent phosphorus, no
more than 0.03 percent sulfur, and no more than 1 percent
nickel.
10. A corrosion resistant austenitic stainless steel alloy which is
substantially fully austenitic and nonmagnetic in its annealed
condition and in its cold worked condition and which has a room
temperature ultimate tensile strength of at least about 120,000 psi
in its annealed condition, said alloy consisting essentially in
weight percent of about
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to austenitic stainless steel having
outstanding corrosion resistance and, more particularly, to such
steel which contains as essential elements only manganese,
chromium, molybdenum, copper, nitrogen and iron, and which has
improved corrosion resistance and strength as compared to such
nickel-bearing stainless steel alloys as A.I.S.I. Type 304 or Type
316.
Hitherto, efforts have been made to provide nickel-free or low
nickel-bearing austenitic stainless steel alloys at least
comparable to A.I.S.I. 300 series alloys, such as Type 304 or Type
316, in corrosion resistance and strength, but such efforts have
left much to be desired. For example, Dulis and Day U.S. Pat. No.
3,075,839 relates to an alloy containing up to 0.15 percent carbon,
11-14 percent manganese, 14-18 percent chromium, 0.3 to 3 percent
molybdenum, 0.15 to 0.55 percent nitrogen and the balance iron.
Optional elements include up to 2 percent copper, up to 3 percent
silicon, but both are included as essential elements in the
preferred composition of the Dulis and Day patent. That patent
emphasizes that when manganese is present in amounts substantially
greater than about 14 percent, it tends to form ferrite and is,
therefore, objectionable in larger amounts even though the amount
of nitrogen which can be kept in solution in such steels can be
increased by increasing the amount of manganese.
Allen U.S. Pat. No. 3,615,366 relates to a stainless steel alloy
consisting of up to 0.15 percent carbon, 3 to 10 percent manganese,
0.15 to 1 percent silicon, 15-19 percent chromium, 3.5 to 6 percent
nickel, 0.5 to 4 percent copper, 0.04 to 0.4 percent nitrogen and
the remainder iron. Allen, like Dulis and Day, warns against the
use of excessive amounts of manganese and points out that excessive
manganese results in the formation of ferrite at hot-working
temperatures with resultant risk of breakage in the hot mill. Allen
also points out that above 10 percent, manganese becomes
uneconomical.
Despite the development of those steels and others, it is yet a
desirable goal to provide a stainless steel with little or no
nickel which has higher strength than A.I.S.I. Types 304 and 316
and which has comparable or better corrosion resistance than those
types.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is, therefore, a principal object of this invention to provide
an austenitic stainless steel containing little or no nickel which
can be produced using conventional metallurgical techniques, using
less costly alloying elements than alloys such as Type 304 and Type
316 and yet having greater strength and at least comparable
corrosion resistance.
A more specific object is to provide such an alloy which contains
as essential elements only manganese, chromium, molybdenum, copper,
nitrogen and iron, which has greater strength than such alloys as
A.I.S.I. Type 304 and Type 316, and which has better resistance to
corrosion than such alloys in reducing media such as dilute
sulfuric acid and in pitting environments such as
chloride-containing media.
The foregoing objects and further advantages of the present
invention are attained in a significant measure by providing an
alloy consisting essentially of the following elements in about the
amounts stated in the broad ranges and are fully attained by
providing an alloy consisting essentially of about the more
restricted amounts of the elements indicated in the preferred
ranges. Here and elsewhere throughout this application by percent
is intended weight percent unless otherwise indicated and the
balance of each composition is essentially iron plus incidental
impurities and such other elements customarily employed in the
preparation of such compositions.
______________________________________ Broad Preferred
______________________________________ Carbon 0.25* 0.05-0.15
Manganese 15-20 16-19 Silicon 1* 0.75* Phosphorus 0.05* 0.03*
Sulphur 0.5* 0.03* Chromium 16-22 17-19 Nickel 3* 1* Molybdenum
0.5-3 0.5-1.5 Copper 0.5-2 0.5-1.5 Boron 0.01* ** Nitrogen 0.2-0.8
0.4-0.65 ______________________________________ *Maximum
**Preferably not added or no more than a residual amount
Silicon is present as an incident to the steel making process
because of its use as a deoxidizer but other deoxidizing agents
such as aluminum though less preferred can also be used. The larger
amounts of sulfur indicated in the broad range are used when it is
desired to impart greater free machining to the composition and for
this purpose other free-machining additives such as up to 0.75
percent selenium could also be used. Thus, by reference to 0.5
percent sulfur it is intended to include appropriate amounts of
such other free-machining additives as are used in austenitic
stainless steels.
It is to be noted that while the best all-around properties are
provided by the preferred composition, it is not intended to
restrict the composition of this invention to the ranges indicated
in tabular form which was solely for ready reference. It is
contemplated that any one or more of the preferred ranges indicated
can be used with any one or more of the broad ranges indicated for
the remaining elements.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
In this composition carbon and nitrogen work as austenite formers
with carbon being tolerable in amounts up to a maximum of about
0.25 percent to ensure freedom from ferrite. However, excessive
amounts of carbon are undesirable because of impairment of
corrosion resistance from the formation of carbides when more
carbon is introduced than can be retained in solid solution in the
steel. Because of its beneficial effect, from about 0.05-0.15
percent carbon is preferably included in the steel.
As was seen, silicon is not a required alloying addition and is
tolerable in an amount up to about 1 percent, but preferably is
limited to no more than 0.75 percent. Phosphorus and sulfur are
each preferably present, if at all, in an amount no greater than
about 0.03 percent although up to a maximum of about 0.05 percent
phosphorus can be present. In the case of sulfur as much as 0.5
percent, or as a substitute 0.75 percent selenium, can be present
to improve machinability or free-cutting properties when that is
desired and any accompanying impairment of corrosion resistance can
be tolerated. When used together the combined total of 1.5 .times.
(%S) + (%Se) should not be greater than 0.75 percent.
Manganese, like carbon and nitrogen, is an austenite former, but is
much less powerful in that regard than carbon or nitrogen each of
which is about 60 times stronger on a weight percent basis.
Consequently, manganese, by ensuring the solubility of the larger
amounts of nitrogen in this composition, has a much greater effect
on maintaining the austenitic balance of the composition than it
alone could provide while minimizing the possibility that unsound
metal may result. For this purpose, at least about 15 percent
manganese is required, but above about 20 percent, the benefit
attained from further additions of manganese does not appear to be
worth the added cost.
Nitrogen not only is a very strong austenite former, but also
serves to strengthen this composition. When present in the
preferred amount of about 0.4 to 0.65 percent, it ensures that this
composition has an ultimate strength in its annealed condition of
at least about 120,000 to 130,000 psi. It is, of course, necessary
that the nitrogen present be retained in solution during
solidification of the melt when the alloy is prepared to avoid
blowy or unsound metal. Thus, while from 0.2 to 0.8 percent
nitrogen can be present, the larger amounts of nitrogen must be
used with the larger amounts of the other alloying elements,
particularly, manganese and chromium. Nitrogen is preferably
limited to about 0.65 percent, as was seen, and for best results
0.4 to 0.55 percent nitrogen is used.
Chromium is important to provide the minimum desired corrosion
resistance in an oxidizing environment, and for this purpose, at
least about 16 percent is required. Above about 22 percent, too
much of the austenite-forming elements are required to preserve the
austenitic balance of this composition. Best results are attained
with about 17 to 19 percent chromium.
While nickel is an austenite-forming element, it has an adverse
effect on the resistance of the composition to pitting, as for
example, in chloride-containing environments. Thus, while some
small amount up to a maximum of about 3 percent can be tolerated to
help balance the composition as when the smaller amounts of
nitrogen are used, preferably no more than residual amounts are
permitted which can amount to as much as about 1 percent depending
upon the nature of the materials used in making the
composition.
Molybdenum contributes to the corrosion resistance of this
composition and at least 0.5 percent molybdenum is present for this
reason. Preferably no more than about 1.5 percent molybdenum is
used because, like chromium, it is a ferrite former although up to
as much as 3 percent can be present, particularly with the larger
amounts of the austenite-forming elements. Larger amounts of
molybdenum would tend to upset the austenitic balance of the alloy.
Tungsten can be substituted for all or part of the molybdenum in
the ration of 1.5 to 1, that is, 0.75 to 4.5 percent tungsten can
be used or part of the molybdenum can be replaced by tungsten in
the proportions stated.
Copper is an austenite-forming element, but cannot be tolerated in
amounts greater than about 2 percent in this composition because of
its detrimental effect on the hot workability of the composition.
Preferably 0.5 to 1.5 percent copper is used because of its
beneficial effect in improving corrosion resistance and also
resistance to pitting in chloride-containing environments. However,
as the amount of copper present is increased above about 1.5
percent, its adverse effect upon hot workability becomes apparent.
Furthermore, when the amount of manganese in this composition is
increased above about 18 percent, the amount of copper should be
kept below 1.5 percent and preferably to no more than about 1
percent to favor hot workability.
Molybdenum and copper work together in this composition to provide
better corrosion resistance than either element in a like amount
can provide alone. For example, when about 1 percent each of
molybdenum and copper is present, the improvement obtained is
significantly greater than when about 2 percent molybdenum and no
copper is present or when about 2 percent copper and no molybdenum
is present.
Boron is preferably not added to this composition, and is
preferably not present in amounts greater than as a residual
element introduced incidentally by the materials or equipment used
in the steel making process. However, if desired, up to about 0.01
percent can be included for its beneficial effect on hot
workability of the composition.
The alloy of this invention can be made and shaped using
essentially the same equipment, processes and temperatures normally
used in the making and shaping of the A.I.S.I. 300 series
austenitic stainless steels. Thus, the composition can be hot
worked from a starting temperature of about 2000.degree. to
2300.degree.F and annealing is carried out from about 1850.degree.
to 2050.degree.F. The balance of the alloy is maintained such that
it is fully austenitic, that is no more than about 5 percent
ferrite, both at room temperature and when being hot worked. The
composition can be hardened and strengthened by cold reduction as
is customary with the 300 series grades.
Because of its unique combination of high strength and corrosion
resistance and because large amounts of nickel, a costly alloying
addition present in the 300 series alloys, are not used in this
composition, it is especially well suited for use in making parts,
particularly, stressed parts such as turbine shafting, for use in
chemical processing or other corrosive environments. This alloy is
also well suited for use in making valves and load lifting members
such as cables for use in handling loads to be immersed in
corrosive media.
Thus, the alloy of this invention is readily prepared and worked in
accordance with good standard commercial practice. The following
examples of this invention were melted as small experimental ingots
using an induction furnace without vacuum. Bars three-fourths in.
sq. were forged from the ingots using a starting temperature of
about 2150.degree.F. Test sample blanks were cut from the bars,
annealed at about 1950.degree.F for one-half hour, water quenched
and then machined into standard test specimens. In Table I, the
composition of specific examples is given, the balance of each
being iron and the usual incidental impurities including less than
0.015 percent phosphorus and less than 0.015 percent sulfur.
TABLE I
__________________________________________________________________________
Ex. No. C Mn Si Cr Ni Mo Cu N
__________________________________________________________________________
1 .09 16.07 .44 17.96 .17 .96 .99 .50 2 .09 16.07 .44 17.96 2.19
.96 .99 .47 3 .1 18.04 .36 18.03 .35 .96 .94 .65
__________________________________________________________________________
Metallographic examination of each of the examples in the annealed
condition showed each to be fully austenitic with a grain size of
about A.S.T.M. 5-6. Mechanical properties obtained from standard
0.252 inch diameter tensile specimens are listed in Table II. In
the table, the 0.2 percent yield strength and ultimate tensile
strength are indicated in thousands of pounds per square inch (ksi)
under "0.2%YS" and "UTS" respectively. The percent elongation and
reduction in area are indicated under "El" and "RA" respectively,
and the V-notch Charpy impact strength in foot pounds is indicated
under "VNC." The results of two tests are given.
TABLE II ______________________________________ .2%YS UTS El RA VNC
Ex. No. (ksi) (ksi) (%) (%) (Ft. Lbs.)
______________________________________ 1 68.1 126.8 62.3 75.7 229
73.6 128.3 60.0 73.3 >240 2 66.8 121.2 58.0 74.9 208 68.5 123.9
62.5 74.3 191 3 80.2 137.7 55.7 75.3 -- 77.7 135.5 55.6 75.3 --
______________________________________
Duplicate test specimens of each of Examples 1-3 each 1 1/2 in.
.times. 1/2 in. 1/8 in. with a three-sixteenths in. hole prepared
as was described hereinabove were immersed in a 5 weight percent
aqueous solution of ferric chloride (FeCl.sub.3) at room
temperature. After 3 hours the weight loss in grams was determined
and found to be 0.0043 g. and 0.0045 g. for the specimens of
Example 1, 0.0025 g. and 0.0033 g. for the specimens of Example 2,
and 0.0014 g. and 0.0013 g. for the specimens of Example 3. Despite
the apparent good result obtained in that experiment with the
specimens of Example 2, nickel nevertheless has been found to be
harmful to the pitting resistance of the composition and causes
erratic behavior in such media.
Similar duplicate specimens were immersed in 5 weight percent
sulfuric acid at a temperature of 80.degree.C and the average
corrosion rate in mils per year (mpy) after exposure of each of two
specimens was calculated and found to be 2.3 mpy and 2.2 mpy for
Example 1, 3.8 mpy and 0.9 mpy for Example 2, and 1.8 mpy for each
of the specimens of Example 3.
Similar duplicate test specimens of each of Examples 1-3 were
immersed in boiling 65 weight percent nitric acid. The average
corrosion rate in mils per year after 5 48-hour periods for each
specimen was calculated and found to be 42.7 mpy and 45.6 mpy for
Example 1, 29.7 mpy and 29.9 mpy for Example 2, and 40.5 mpy and
42.6 mpy for Example 3.
For comparison corresponding specimens were prepared of A.I.S.I.
Type 316 containing 0.05 percent carbon, 1.86 percent manganese,
0.68 percent silicon, 0.023 percent phosphorus, 0.013 percent
sulfur, 17.80 percent chromium, 12.26 percent nickel, 2.19 percent
molybdenum, 0.23 percent copper, and the balance iron plus
incidental impurities which included about 0.025 percent nitrogen.
Room temperature tensile properties were 35 ksi 0.2 percent YS, 85
ksi UTS, 60 percent El and 70 percent RA. Weight lost after 3 hours
in 5 weight percent ferric chloride at room temperature was 0.0060
g., the average corrosion rate in 5 weight percent sulfuric acid at
80.degree.C after 3 48-hour periods was found to be 20.8 mpy and
22.5 mpy. Specimens of Type 316 were not subjected to the boiling
65 w/o nitric acid test, but from past experience with Type 316 it
would be expected to give an average corrosion rate of about 10
mpy.
The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as
terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no
intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any
equivalents of the features shown and described or portions
thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are
possible within the scope of the invention claimed.
* * * * *