U.S. patent number 3,901,793 [Application Number 05/398,742] was granted by the patent office on 1975-08-26 for process for the preconcentration of ores by induced measure of the superficial contents.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres. Invention is credited to Pierre Charles Buchot, Richard Cohen-Alloro, Jean-Claude E. Robert.
United States Patent |
3,901,793 |
Buchot , et al. |
August 26, 1975 |
Process for the preconcentration of ores by induced measure of the
superficial contents
Abstract
The concentration of a desired material in pieces of ore is
determined by coating each piece with a fluorescent material that
selectively adheres only to the exposed surfaces of the desired
material. The pieces are then individually illuminated by
ultraviolet radiation to fluoresce the selectively coated material.
First photo-multipliers sense the magnitude of the fluorescence and
a second photo-multiplier, which detects the shadow of the ore
piece, yields an output proportional, after inversion, to the
cross-sectional area of the ore piece. The magnitude value is then
divided by the area value to indicate the concentration of the
desired material in the ore piece, which may serve as a basis for
automatically separating the pieces for further treatment.
Inventors: |
Buchot; Pierre Charles
(Versailles, FR), Cohen-Alloro; Richard (Orleans,
FR), Robert; Jean-Claude E. (Orleans, FR) |
Assignee: |
Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et
Minieres (Paris, FR)
|
Family
ID: |
27249695 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/398,742 |
Filed: |
September 19, 1973 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
237312 |
Mar 23, 1972 |
3795310 |
|
|
|
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10, 1971 [FR] |
|
|
71.40299 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
209/3.3; 209/9;
209/166; 209/578 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G01N
21/64 (20130101); B03B 1/04 (20130101); B07C
5/3427 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B03B
1/00 (20060101); B03B 1/04 (20060101); B07C
5/342 (20060101); G01N 21/64 (20060101); B03B
001/04 () |
Field of
Search: |
;209/1,3,9,166,167 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Halper; Robert
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sughrue, Rothwell, Mion, Zinn and
Macpeak
Parent Case Text
This is a division of application Ser. No. 237,312 filed Mar. 23,
1972, now Pat. No. 3,795,310.
Claims
What we claim is:
1. In a process to effect a precise preconcentration of specific
minerals disposed on the surface of blocks of ores, the said ores
being washed and soaked in a selective collector substance and a
fluorescent matter for rendering fluorescent any desired portion of
the ore during irradiation of the blocks of ore by an ultraviolet
radiation source having a narrow frequency band, the blocks of ore
being sorted automatically as a result of the detection of the
fluorescent radiation, the process being characterized by the
selective action of the collector substance being reinforced either
during the washing of the blocks of ore by a wetting and scouring
substance selected from among an initial group of specific
substances, or after the washing operation, with or without a
wetting and scouring substance, by a known substance acting as an
activating or depressing substance chosen from a second group; the
determination of the fluorescent radiation R emitted by at least
one third of the surface of the irradiated fragment as a result of
the measurement of the radiation of a fluorescent screen emitting
an amount proportional to (S-s) wherein S is a constant related to
the surface area of the screen and s the cross-sectional area of
the fragment; the calculation of an amount of specific mineral as a
function of the mass content of the block the display of at least
one predetermined minimum content; the comparison of the calculated
value of the amount of specific mineral with the displayed content;
and the selection and sorting of the blocks of ores by the
calculated content of which is less or greater than the displayed
content.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the wetting and scouring
agents are selected from the group comprising: soda, lime, sodium
carbonate, sulphuric acid, hydrofluoric acid, hydrochloric acid,
sodium sulphate and sodium chloride associated with sulphonated or
alkyl-sulphated anionic compounds, pine oil, terpenic, aromatic or
hydroaromatic solvents such as tetraline.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein, to reinforce the
selective action of the collector substance in the separation of
sulphides from gangue or veinstone or sulphur-containing ores of
copper, lead, zinc, silver, gold, antimony, molybdenum, the wetting
and scouring agent comprises one of the following agents: soda,
lime, sodium carbonate, sulphuric acid dissolved in 1 - 2 m.sup.3
of water, applied at the rate of 500 - 2,500g per ton of ore,
followed by use of copper sulphate at the rate of 250 - 500g per
ton of ore, this action commencing immediately before or taking
place simultaneously with the action of the collector and the
fluorescent matter.
4. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein, to reinforce the
selective action of the collector substance in the separation of
oxides of copper, lead, zinc from the gangue or veinstone, the
wetting and scouring agent selected from the group: lime, sulphuric
acid is used at the rate of 2000 - 4000g per ton of ore, followed
by the action of sodium sulphide at the rate of 1000 - 4000g per
ton of ore, this action taking place immediately before or
simultaneously with the action of the collector and the fluorescent
matter.
5. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein, to reinforce the
selective action of the collector substance in the separation of
feldspars from quartz, the wetting and scouring agent from the
group: sulphuric acid, hydrofluoric acid, and is used at the rate
of 500 - 1000g per ton of ore in the case of sulphuric acid or at
the rate of 500g per ton in the case of hydrofluoric acid.
6. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein, to reinforce the
selective action of the collector substance in the separation of
calcite from quartz, the action of a depressant, sodium silicate,
is used at the rate of 100 - 250g per ton of ore.
7. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein, to reinforce the
selective action of the collector substance in the separation of
barite from quartz or from iron oxide, sodium carbonate is used at
the rate of 300 - 1400g per ton of ore as wetting and scouring
agent, followed by the application of starch at the rate of 50 -
200g per ton of ore as depressant of iron oxide.
8. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein, to reinforce the
selective action of the collector substance in the separation of
potash from the gangue or veinstone and sodium chloride, starch is
used at the rate of 30 - 200g per ton of ore.
9. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein, to reinforce the
selective action of the collector substance in the separation of
quartz from calcite, hydrofluoric acid is used at the rate of 200 -
500g per ton of ore as wetting and scouring substance.
10. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the collecting
substance is selected from the group: sodium or potassium xanthate,
dithiophosphoric acid, mercaptobenzothiazol, amino acetate, oleic
acid, sodium oleate, sodium sulphonate, tall-oil: and the
fluorescent matter from the group: anthracene, napthacene,
pentacene, chrysene, dibenzanthracene, fluoresceine, eosine,
erythrosine, rhodamine, primuline, azines, quinine sulphate,
esculine.
11. A process as claimed in claim 1, the fluorescent matter of
which is composed of 10 - 50g of anthracene dissolved in benzene in
saturated solution per ton of ore and the collector of which is
respectively for the sulphur-containing ores of copper, lead, zinc,
silver, gold, antimony, molybdenum, one of a group consisting of:
sodium xanthate, dithiophosphoric acid at the rate of 50 - 500g per
ton or ore; for the oxidised ores of copper, lead, zinc, is one of
the agents: potassium xanthate, mercaptobenzothiazol at the rate of
300 - 1000g per ton; for feldspaths: amino acetate at the rate of
200 - 600g per ton of ore; for calcite: oleic acid at the rate of
200 - 1000g per ton of ore; for barite one of the agents: sodium
oleate, sodium sulphonate, tall-oil at the rate of 200 - 500g per
ton; for potassium and quartz: amino acetate at the rate of 200 -
500g per ton of ore.
Description
The present invention, due to P. Bachot, R. Cohen-Allaro and J. C.
Robert in the course of work entrusted to them by the applicant
Company, concerns a process and the apparatus employed for carrying
out said process for the preconcentration of ores by automatic
sorting of their different fragments varying in the concentration
of one or more specific elements.
It has long been known to sort fragments of ores by utilizing the
effects of natural or artificial radiations of the minerals on the
surface of the fragments of numerous ore and more recently the use
of fluorescent agents has been recommended, with or without
collector substances, in order to facilitate the sorting of the
fragments as a function of the presence of certain ores.
These methods have the disadvantages of giving only inprecise
qualitative results and can be used only when the fragments to be
sorted have dimensions varying only within a very narrow limit of
20% at the most. Even apart from the necessary costs for obtaining
fragments of dimensions within very narrow limits, it has therefore
been impossible to effect an efficient preconcentration of ores
containing the desired minerals only in a small or very small
content of the order of 0.1% for example, for current metals of
relatively low value. In the case of higher contents, the more or
less precise concentration could be obtained only at the cost of
several screening operations.
In order to evaluate the contents, systems have in fact been
proposed using the apparent volume of the fragments, but since no
apparatus has yet been designed for determining the superficial
contents with precision and comparing them with any predetermined
contents, the problem of the precise preconcentration has never
been solved, even in the most favourable cases.
The object of the present invention is a process and the apparatus
necessary for carrying out this process intended to effectuate a
precise preconcentration of certain minerals existing on the
surface of the blocks of ores. The ores are then washed and soaked
in a selective collector substance and a fluorescent material for
rendering fluorescent any desired portion of the ore during the
irradiation of the blocks by an ultra-violet radiation source
having a narrow frequency band. The blocks are then sorted
automatically during the detection of the fluorescent radiation,
the process and the apparatus for carrying out this process is
characterised in that the selective action of the collector
substance is reinforced either during the washing of the blocks of
ore by a wetting and scouring substance selected from an initial
group of specific substances, or after the washing, with or without
wetting and scouring substances, by a known substance in the art of
flotation as activating or depressant substance which is chosen
from a second specific group. The process is also characterised by
the measurement of fluorescent radiation R emitted by at least one
third of the surface of the irradiated fragment, by the measurement
of the radiation of a fluorescent screen emitting an amount
proportional to (S-s) wherein S is a constant and is the surface of
the fluorescent screen emitting under the action of the radiation
received and in which s is the vertical section of the analyzed
block.
The tests undertaken show that precise preconcentrations can be
carried out not only on blocks of ore comprising separate minerals,
but on blocks comprising unseparated minerals, the predetermined
content serving as a point of comparison being capable of being
selected either with a view to the selection of a single mineral or
to the selection of a group of minerals.
The operation achieved in this manner and terminating in great
precision in the selection, has the advantage of being capable of
being effected before crushing of ores, whose elements having a
value which is to be preconcentrated, are not necessarily
liberated. In certain cases the operation may also be effected on
any unsorted ore coming from the mine or after simple crushing.
Hence, contrary to known methods, not only can the operation of
preconcentration be carried out before any crushing, thus reducing
the cost of obtaining the desired mineral or minerals to a very
considerable extent, but the scale of granulometry can also be
extended as much as possible, taking into account, on the one hand,
the output of the selecting apparatus carrying out the described
process and, on the other hand, the maximum possible dimensions for
the blocks to be treated. Hence, instead of treating only blocks
whose dimensions do not vary by more than 20%, blocks may be easily
treated whose dimensions vary for example from the single to the
triple. By way of example, in an initial apparatus, blocks of 60mm
to 130mm may be treated, in a second apparatus blocks of 20 to
60mm. Moreover, in cases where the fragments have dimensions lower
than a given threshold and are no longer economically capable of
being preconcentrated due to the poor outputs of the apparatus, it
is still possible to reintroduce them into the treatment circuit
downstream of the preconcentration of the fragments of larger
dimensions.
It will also be noticed, that, as a result of the measurements of a
size proportional to (S-s) in which S is a constant and s the
vertical section of the block under analysis, obscurities are
avoided which result from direct measurement of the content R/s
when s tends towards zero, that is to say, in the case of dust.
Another object of the present invention is a process conforming to
the stated characteristics and also characterised by the feature
that the contents are evaluated by means of two successive analysis
stations displaced relatively to each other for analysing the
blocks in displaced zones and thus covering almost the whole of the
surface of each block.
This characteristic permits a fine analysis not only of blocks of
small dimensions, but also of blocks of large dimensions
distributed over an extensive granulometric range, this analysis
being effected as a function of any value of the predetermined
contents, even low values capable of descending approximately to
0.1 of the original value.
Furthermore, the process which has just been described allows
preconcentration of precious metals, the contents of which are of
the order of a few grams per ton, principally when they are
associated with sulphur-containing mineral ores: gold associated
with mispickel, pyrites etc. In this case, the preconcentration of
elements of value is effected by the measurements of the contents
of the associated ores.
In order that the invention may readily be carried into practice,
two embodiments will now be described in detail, by way of example
with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a vertical schematic view of the apparatus,
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the analysing members, accompanied by
all the circuits of the apparatus.
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a variant of the apparatus shown in
FIG. 2, and
FIG. 4 shows the control circuits of the calculating and selecting
members of the apparatus shown in FIG. 3.
Before any measurement is made of the superficial content of the
blocks in a given mineral, preconditioning is effected, consisting
of simple washing with water in the presence of a wetting and
scouring agent, selected from a group of the following agents:
Soda, lime, sodium carbonate, sulphuric acid, hydrofluoric acid,
hydrochloric acid, sodium sulphate and sodium chloride in
association with anionic sulphonated or alkylsulphated compounds,
pine oil, terpenic, aromatic or hydro-aromatic solvents such as
tetraline.
This operation has the advantage of powdering the blocks and also
of ensuring rapid exposure and initmate contact of the reagents for
the preparation of the surfaces used in the course of the second
conditioning. This is the treatment of sulphur-containing mineral
ores of Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, Au, Sb, Mo for separating sulphides from
the gangue by 500 to 25,000g of one of the following agents:
soda, lime, sodium carbonate or sulphuric acid, which is mixed with
1-2 m.sup.3 of water for 1 ton of ore.
The feldspaths conditioned for their separation from the quartz are
treated either with sulphuric acid at the rate of 500 to 1000g per
ton of ore, the acid being dissolved in 1-2 m.sup.3 of water, or by
hydrofluoric acid at the rate of 400 - 600 g per ton of ore.
For its separation from the quartz and iron oxide the conditioned
barite is treated with sodium carbonate at the rate of 550 to 900g
dissolved in 1- 2 m.sup.3 of water per ton of ore.
The conditioned quartz is treated with 200 - 500g of hydrofluoric
acid per ton of ore for separation from calcite.
After this initial conditioning, the second conditioning is
effected and, for this purpose, the ore originally washed with or
without a wetting and scouring agent is mixed in any suitable
apparatus, a trommel for example.
In the case of sulphur-containing ores of Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, Au, Sb,
Mo, a solution comprising 50 - 500 grams of xanthate or
dithiophosphoric acid for 1 ton of ore is selected as collector and
copper sulphate is used at the rate of 250 - 500g per ton of ore as
activator.
The fluorescent reagent used is then preferably anthracene
dissolved in benzene and at the rate of 10 - 60g per ton of
ore.
For oxidised ores of Cu, Pb, Zn, a long-chain xanthate such as
hexlyxanthate or again mercaptobenzothiazol at the rate of 300 -
700g is selected as collector and, as activating agent, sodium
sulphide at the rate of 1000 - 4000g per ton of ore.
For Feldspars, a collector such as amineacetate at the rate of 200
- 600g per ton of ore will be sufficient.
For the separation of calcite from the quartz, oleic acid is used
as collector, at the rate of 200 - 1000g for 1 ton of ore and this
treatment is completed by a depressant: sodium silicate at the rate
of 100 - 250g per ton of ore, without it being necessary to add a
wetting and scouring agent to the initial washing.
In the case of barite, a sodium oleate or a sodium sulphonate or a
tall-oil is used as collector, at the rate of 200 - 500g per ton of
ore, and the treatment is completed by the action of a depressant:
starch at the rate of 50 - 200g per ton of ore, starch being a
depressant of iron oxide.
The separation of quartz from fluorine is effected by selecting as
collector sodium oleate at the rate of 100 - 300g per ton of ore --
the first conditioning may be effected without the use of a
scouring agent.
The separation of potash from its gangue or veinstone and of NaCl,
is effected by selecting an amino acetate or an amino hydrochloride
at the rate of 200 - 500 grams per ton of ore and by completing
this treatment with a depressant: starch, at the rate of 50 - 100g
per ton of ore, it being possible to effect the first conditioning
without the use of a scouring agent.
In the separation of quartz from calcite, an acetate or an
amino-hydrochloride is used as collector at the rate of 200 - 500g
per ton of ore -- the first conditioning is effected by using
hydrofluoric acid.
In all the cases which have thus been mentioned, the fluorescent
agent is preferably anthracene dissolved in benzene at the rate of
10 - 60g per ton of ore.
However, anthracene may also be replaced by the following agents:
naphthacene, pentacene, chrysene, dibenzanthracene, fluoresceine,
eosine, erythresine, rhodamine, azines such as primuline for
example, esculine, sulphate of quinine.
In general, experience has shown that the preparation of the
surfaces depends on the one hand, on the physico-chemical
techniques of the flotation reagents and, on the other hand, on the
solubilisation of these reagents in a solvent capable of emitting
fluorescent light under the action of ultra-violet irradiation.
Hence, the reagents employed are of the same type as those required
in the flotation of fine mineral particles and comprise the
conventional anionic or cationic collectors, activating agents,
depressants, regulators. Since these reagents are not generally
fluorescent per se, they are used in solution in a liquid
fluorescent under ultra-violet light, such as anthracene dissolved
in the aforesaid benzene.
The method may therefore be applied to all minerals in blocks
wherein the useful products are native metals or metalloid copper,
silver, gold, sulphur, graphite or metallic sulphides, of iron,
zinc, lead, copper, silver or non-sulphur containing ores,
cerusite, magnetite, ilmenite, tungsten, fluorine, barite.
After proceeding under the stated conditions: washing with or
without a wetting or scouring agent, then treatment with the
reagents of the art of flotation, combined with solubilisation of
these reagents with a solvent emitting a fluorescent light under
the action of ultra-violet irradiation, the blocks of ore are
emptied into the hopper 1, FIG. 1, from where they flow one by one
through any known distributing device 2 to drop down a free chute
to an analysis section 3, shown in FIG. 2, which controls a
mechanical selecting device 4. When the device 4 is controlled, the
block 5, which has just been analysed, is deflected to the right to
drop into the passage 6; in the contrary case, the block 5 drops
into the passage 7.
The analysing device 3, shown in FIG. 2, comprises three
ultra-violet radiation sources 8, 9, 10, the source 10 projecting
onto the red fluorescent screen 11 a beam partially intercepted by
the block 5 analysed in the course of its fall. The beam of red
light coming from the screen 11 is detected by the photo-multiplier
12, while the induced light produced by the ultraviolet radiation
on the surface of the block 5 is detected by the photo-multipliers
13 and 14. The source 8 - 10 and the photo-multipliers 12 and 14
are supplied with suitable filters in order to avoid any alteration
in the measurements of the radiation. A current source 15 feeds the
photo-multipliers 12 - 14 through the wires 16 and the sources 8 -
10 through the wires 17.
A calculator 18 receives the measurements of induced radiation of
the block 5 through the wires 19 and 20. The radiation received
from the screen 11 by the photo-multiplier 12 is proportional to
S-s in which S is the surface area of the fluorescent screen 11
emitting under the action of the radiation received in the absence
of the block and in which s is the vertical section of the analysed
block. The measurement of the radiation of the fluorescent screen
is transformed by the inverter 21 connected to the photo-multiplier
12 by the wire 22 to supply the calculator 18, through the wire 23,
with a value proportional to 1/S-s. Hence the calculator 18
receives a current (or, if desired, a voltage, according to the
technology employed) proportional to the induced radiation of the
surface of the block 5 through the wires 19 and 20 and a current or
voltage, as a function of the cross-section of the block 5, through
the wire 23. The calculator thus makes it possible to transmit to
the comparator at 24 through the wire 25, an amount which is a
function of the superficial content of the block 5, which content
is practically that of the mass content.
The comparator 24 compares the value of this amount with the
predetermined and adjustable value displayed by means of the button
26. The result of this comparison is transmitted to the control
member 27 of the selection mechanism 4 through the wire 28. A wire
29 connects the control member 27 to the selection mechanism 4
shown in FIG. 1.
In the embodiment shown, the source 10 is disposed on an axis
perpendicular to the common axis of the sources 8 and 9. The axis
of the photo-multiplier 12 is in the extension of the axis of the
source 10.
When the blocks have very heterogeneous surfaces, the analysis
station is doubled and the axes of the devices of the second
station are displaced through a certain angle relatively to the
axes of the first station. The induced radiation is therefore
produced in a part of the block which had not yet been subjected to
the radiation during the exposure to the first station. In the
embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the second station 30 is displaced
through an angle of 180.degree., so that the differences of the
induced radiation may be compared for the same section of the
analysed block.
The claculator 31, FIG. 4, thus receives both the amounts coming
from the station 3 through the wires 19, 20 and 23 and from the
station 30 through the wire 31 connected to the inverter 32,
similar to the inverter 21 of the first station, and through the
wires 33 and 34 connected to the photo-multiplier corresponding to
the photo-multipliers 13 and 14 of the first station. Although only
one result is transmitted to the comparator 35, said comparator may
comprise two buttons 36 and 37 adjustable in position for
displaying two predetermined values of the contents. The apparatus
is therefore supplied with a second selecting device 38, FIG. 3,
connected by the wire 39 to a second control member 40, FIG. 4. The
devices 4 and 38, FIG. 3, are mounted in separate directions so as
to deflect the blocks 5 either towards the passage 6, or towards
the passage 41, the blocks dropping into the passage 7 in the
absence of a control of the devices 4 and 38. It is therefore only
necessary to display two values by means of the buttons 36 and 37
so that the blocks, the contents of which are less than the minimum
content drop into the passage 6, and the blocks having contents
between these two values, drop into 7 and the blocks having a
content greater than the highest, drop into 41.
Again, as a variant, the three sources could be arranged at an
angle of 120.degree. relatively to the axes and the second station
arranged by displacing the axes of these sources relatively to
those of the first station.
In this manner, any dead angle is avoided which might involve
falsification of the measurements.
The apparatus therefore makes it possible to sort blocks of ores
which may be previously separated with the following
granulometories, for example: 80 - 120 mm, 50 - 80 mm, 20 - 50 mm.
It is obvious that it would be possible, if desired, to treat
blocks of less than 20 mm, which case, although special, is not
excluded.
The described process makes it possible to preconcentrate a large
number of ores. For example, preconcentration of a pyrite and
chalcopyrite ore has been obtained by proceeding in the following
manner:
The ore is subjected to an initial conditioning in a trommel for 5
minutes in the presence of water and 1 kg of sodium carbonate per
ton of ore, this mixture being followed by rinsing in a jet of
water at the outlet of the trommel.
The second conditioning is effected by using 300g of potassium
hexylxanthate per ton of ore dissolved in a fluorescent mixture
containing 4g of anthracene in solution in 70ml of benzene.
The passage through the automatic sorting apparatus is effected at
three successive levels or thresholds of contents and makes it
possible to collect the products appearing in the following
Table:
Products Weight % Cu % Recovery % of Cu
______________________________________ Concentrate 1 33 3.65 62.2
Concentrate 2 13 2.35 15.9 Concentrate 3 12 1.25 7.8 Reject 42 0.65
14.1 Unsorted 100 1.90 100.0 material
______________________________________
The reject content rises to 0.65% of Cu, and this value is bound to
the minerological constitution of the treated ore, with diffused
mineralisation.
A test on sulphur-containing lead and zinc ore in fragments of 30 -
80mm was conducted under the same conditions as before and
subjected to automatic sorting. The ore is then separated into a
preconcentrate of galena and a reject lower than 0.1% of Pb.
This reject, having a rich content of zinc sulphide, is subjected
in turn to a further conditioning for 5 minutes in the presence of
100g copper sulphate per ton of ore, then, for a further 5 minutes,
in the presence of 1000g hexylxanthate per ton of ore and 250g per
ton of anthracene in a benzene solution. After rinsing in water and
automatic sorting, it is possible to recover from the residual
blocks having only a very low content of lead, those whose content
of zinc is greater than 0.1%.
The results of this differential sorting operation appear in the
following Table:
Product Weight % Pb % Zn % Recovery % Pb Zn
______________________________________ Concentrated Pb 34.7 2.80
15.35 93.6 72.8 Concentrated Zn 34.6 0.15 5.20 5.0 24.7 Reject 30.7
0.05 0.60 1.4 2.5 Unsorted 100.0 1.05 7.30 100.0 100.0 material
______________________________________
It will be noted that the quantities of reagents employed may very
within appreciable proportions. Thus, the duration of soaking may
vary from 2 - 10 minutes, the quantity of copper sulphate from 50 -
200g, that of hexylxanthate from 500 - 1800g and anthracene from
150 - 400g.
* * * * *