U.S. patent number 3,900,636 [Application Number 05/489,751] was granted by the patent office on 1975-08-19 for method of treating cutting edges.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The Gillette Company. Invention is credited to Colin John Clipstone, Francis Russell Curry.
United States Patent |
3,900,636 |
Curry , et al. |
August 19, 1975 |
Method of treating cutting edges
Abstract
The present invention is concerned with providing improved
cutting edges on cutting instruments such as razor blades by
implanting in the cutting edge ions of a metal, reactive non-metal,
or an inert gas.
Inventors: |
Curry; Francis Russell
(Maidenhead, EN), Clipstone; Colin John (Spencers
Wood, EN) |
Assignee: |
The Gillette Company (Boston,
MA)
|
Family
ID: |
27254136 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/489,751 |
Filed: |
July 18, 1974 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
218824 |
Jan 18, 1972 |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 21, 1971 [GB] |
|
|
2847/71 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
427/526; 427/523;
30/346.53; 204/192.16; 250/492.1; 427/531; 30/346.55; 250/423R;
427/528 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B26B
21/54 (20130101); C23C 14/48 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B26B
21/54 (20060101); C23C 14/48 (20060101); B26B
21/00 (20060101); C23c 017/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;117/93.3,93.1GD,127,132CF,131,16R ;250/492,398,400
;30/346.5,346.54,346.55,350 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Husack; Ralph
Assistant Examiner: Newsome; John H.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Wise; Richard A. Bratlie; Oistein
J. Anderson; William M.
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 218,824
filed Jan. 18, 1972 now abandoned.
Claims
What we claim is:
1. A process for improving a coated or uncoated steel cutting edge,
said process comprising implanting ions selected from the group
consisting of metals, reactive non-metals and inert gases into said
cutting edge, said ions being propelled at said cutting edge in the
form of an ion beam at energies of between about 10 to 400 KeV
until a dose of between about 1 .times. 10.sup.14 ions/cm.sup.2 to
6 .times. 10.sup.17 ions/cm has been implanted.
2. A process as defined in claim 1 in which said cutting edge is a
razor blade.
3. A process as defined in claim 2 in which metallic or
non-metallic ions which will improve the hardness or corrosion
resistance of the steel cutting edge are implanted.
4. A process as defined in claim 2 in which a thin metal coating is
on the cutting edge and metallic or non-metallic ions which will
improve the hardness or corrosion resistance of the coating are
implanted at energies at which a substantial proportion of the ions
will be in the coating.
5. A process as defined in claim 2 wherein a thin metallic coating
is on the cutting edge and metallic, non-metallic or inert gas ions
are implanted at energies such as to penetrate through the cutting
edge-coating interface to improve the adhesion of said coating.
6. A process as defined in claim 2 in which the cutting edge is
coated with a polytetrafluoroethylene coating and ions will improve
the adhesion of the polyethylene are implanted at energies such
that a substantial proportion of said ions are implanted within
100A of the polytetrafluoroethylene substrate surface.
7. A process as defined in claim 6 in which said ions are selected
from chromium and fluorine.
Description
This invention is concerned with a method of improving the
properties of cutting edges, such as those of razor blades. Whilst
the invention will be described hereinafter with specific reference
to razor blades, it is to be understood that the method is equally
applicable to other metal cutting edges, both as used in the razor
art and also such as are formed as surgical instruments and the
like.
Broadly, we have found that properties of a cutting edge can be
improved by subjecting the edge to an ion implantation
treatment.
The technique of ion implantation is known. Briefly, the equipment
used comprises an ion source, an accelerator, an analysing magnet
and an implantation chamber. In the method of the invention, one or
more, usually a stack, of razor blades is placed in the chamber and
the cutting edges are irradiated with a beam of high energy ions
from the ion source. The ions enter the material of the cutting
edge and cause modification of its properties.
We have found, in particular, that ion implantation can be used (i)
to improve the hardness of cutting edges, (ii) to improve the
adhesion of metallic and non-metallic coatings on cutting edges,
and (iii) to improve the corrosion resistance of the cutting edge
material. To obtain all these types of improvement, it is necessary
to use the appropriate ion species for implantation and to use the
appropriate ion energy and ion dose, that is to say, the total
number of ions implanted per unit area. The ion energy will
determine the depth of penetration of the ions into the substrate,
the higher the energy the greater being the penetration, and the
dose will determine the number of ions implanted.
Suitable ions for obtaining the effects referred to will be
described below. The optimum values of the other parameters of the
process, that is the ion energy and the ion dose, can readily be
determined in each particular case by routine trial. The cutting
edges are preferably subjected to the ion implantation treatment in
their sharpened state and care should be taken that the ion energy
and/or the period of irradiation are not so great that physical
damage to the cutting edge due to erosion or overheating of the
cutting edge material takes place. Useful improvements in cutting
edge properties can, however, be obtained in substantially all
cases without risk of such erosion or overheating.
I. Cutting edge hardness
In general, it is the case that the harder the material in which a
cutting edge, for example that of a razor blade, is formed, the
greater is its useful life, other things being equal. The harder
the material, the better able the cutting edge is to retain its
as-sharpened configuration, provided that the hardness is not
accompanied by an undesirably high degree of brittleness. If the
latter is present, use of the cutting edge tends to cause the
breaking away of portions of the cutting edge, rather than wearing
down or deformation of the as-sharpened configuration.
We have found that there are two classes of ions which can be used
to improve the hardness of steel cutting edges: (a) ions of
non-metallic elements which can form compounds with the metal
elements present in the steel, for example, H, B, C, N, O, Si, P
and S, and (b) ions of metallic elements which may or may not form
alloys or compounds with elements present in the steel, for example
strong carbide-forming elements, such as Ti, V, Cr, Fe, Zr, Mo, Hf,
Ta, and W, and other transition metals, such as Co, Ni, Cu, Re, Os,
Ir, Pt and Au.
With both classes of ions, particular combinations of ion energy
and ion dose may lead to the increase in hardness being accompanied
by an undesirable increase in brittleness and we have found that
this is due to the implanted ions exceeding a threshold
concentration at a particular depth from the surface of the
substrate. In general this situation can be avoided by using a
lower ion dose for the particular ion. For nitrogen ions, for
example, this threshold concentration is between 50 and 100 atomic
%.
Suitable ion doses are, in general, at least 10.sup.15
ions/cm.sup.2.
The following examples illustrate effective and non-effective ion
implantation conditions for certain of the ion species mentioned
above.
All these examples, and those given below, were carried out as
follows:
A stack of sharpened steel razor blades was placed in the
implantation chamber of an ion implantation apparatus. The blades
were mounted in a holder so that each blade overlapped the one
above it by about 0.005 inch. The holder was placed in the
implantation chamber so that one side of the cutting edge bevel was
facing the ion beam. The apparatus was then pumped down to a
pressure of about 10.sup.-.sup.6 torr. A beam of the ions to be
implanted of the required energy was provided from an ion source
and analysed by passing through the centre of the pole pieces of
the magnet. This beam of ions passed down a flight tube and
impinged directly on the blade edges, the number of ions arriving
on the blades being closely monitored. When the required does had
been received, the implantation chamber was sealed by a baffle
valve from the ion beam and the implanted blades removed after
admitting air to the chamber.
The stainless steel and carbon steel blades referred to in the
Examples of this specification were formed, respectively, of a
conventional stainless steel containing 12.5-13.5% Cr and 0.6-0.7%
C and a conventional carbon steel containing 1.15-1.3% C.
The hardness of the cutting edges, before and after treatment was
assessed by an indentation test which, in principle, is similar to
a standard indentation hardness determination in which the length
of the impression made by a diamond indentor pressed into the
material under test is inversely proportional to the hardness of
the material. The improvement, if any, in hardness of the blade
edges after ion implantation treatment is shown by the percentage
decrease in the length of the indentation compared with that of the
untreated blades. Because of the nature of the indentation test,
small decreases in indent length (that is decreases of more than
2.5%) can represent significant increases in edge hardness
(decrease of less than 2.5% are usually not significant).
EXAMPLES 1-15
Stainless steel blades were implanted with nitrogen ions.
______________________________________ Ion Energy Ion Dose %
Decrease in Ex KeV ions/cm.sup.2 Indent Length
______________________________________ 1 75 6 .times. 10.sup.17
13.0 2 80 1 .times. 10.sup.16 0 3 80 5 .times. 10.sup.15 0 4 80 1
.times. 10.sup.15 0 5 150 5.5 .times. 10.sup.17 9.4 6 150 2.75
.times. 10.sup.17 7.1 7 150 1.1 .times. 10.sup.17 7.1 8 150 3.6
.times. 10.sup.16 5.2 9 150 7.2 .times. 10.sup.15 0 10 150 3.6
.times. 10.sup.15 5.2 11 250 3.6 .times. 10.sup.17 5.9 12 250 1.4
.times. 10.sup.17 5.3 13 250 3.6 .times. 10.sup.16 2.9 14 250 7.2
.times. 10.sup.15 0 15 250 3.6 .times. 10.sup.15 0
______________________________________
EXAMPLES 16-22
Carbon steel blades were implanted with nitrogen ions.
______________________________________ Ion Energy Ion Dose %
Decrease in Ex KeV ions/cm.sup.2 Indent Length
______________________________________ 16 80 1 .times. 10.sup.16
4.2 17 80 1 .times. 10.sup.15 2.6 18 150 5.5 .times. 10.sup.17 6.7
19 150 2.75 .times. 10.sup.17 2.8 20 150 1.1 .times. 10.sup.17 2.6
21 150 3.6 .times. 10.sup.15 0 22 250 1.4 .times. 10.sup.17 3.4
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 23
Stainless steel blades were implanted with oxygen ions.
______________________________________ Ion Energy Ion dose %
Decrease in KeV ions/cm.sup.2 Indent Length
______________________________________ 15 1.6 .times. 10.sup.17 4.5
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 24
Stainless steel blades were implanted with titanium ions.
______________________________________ Ion Energy Ion dose %
Decrease in KeV ions/cm.sup.2 Indent Length
______________________________________ 250 2 .times. 10.sup.16 7.6
______________________________________
EXAMPLES 25 and 26
Stainless steel blades were implanted with nickel ions.
______________________________________ Ion Energy Ion dose %
Decrease in Ex KeV ions/cm.sup.2 Indent Length
______________________________________ 25 200 3.7 .times. 10.sup.16
6.5 26 400 6.2 .times. 10.sup.16 6.5
______________________________________
Steel cutting edges which have been coated with thin films of
metals, such as Cr, Pt, W, Ti and Al, and mixtures or alloys of two
or more of these metals, can also be hardened by ion implantation.
For this purpose any of the ions in groups (a) and (b) above can be
used; the ion energy used should be such that the majority of the
implanted ions remain in the thickness of the metal coating.
Suitable ion doses are, in general, at least 10.sup.15
ions/cm.sup.2.
The following examples illustrate suitable conditions for ion
implantation into coated razor blades.
EXAMPLE 27
Stainless steel blades having a sputtered coating of aluminium 40
nm thick were implanted with oxygen ions so that the majority of
the ions remained within the coating thickness.
______________________________________ Ion Energy Ion Dose %
Decrease in KeV ions/cm.sup.2 Indent Length
______________________________________ 15 1.6 .times. 10.sup.17 7.4
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 28
Stainless steel blades having a sputtered coating of titanium 100
nm thick were implanted with nitrogen ions so that the majority of
the ions remained within the coating thickness.
______________________________________ Ion Energy Ion Dose %
Decrease in KeV ions/cm.sup.2 Indent Length
______________________________________ 100 1.1 .times. 10.sup.17
5.7 ______________________________________
ii. Coating adhesion
We have found that the adhesion of metallic and metallic compound,
such as metallic oxide, coatings on cutting edges can be improved
by implanting ions with energies such that the ions penetrate the
substrate/coating interface. The coatings in question are, for
example, W, Ta, Ti, Au, V, Mo, Pt and Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ; they may
be formed on the cutting edge by any procedure that gives a thin
uniform coating, for example, sputtering.
There are two classes of ions which can be used to bring about such
increase in coating adhesion (a) ions of inert gases, that is He,
Ne, A, Kr and Xe, and (b) ions of elements which are capable of
reacting with the substrate material and/or the coating material,
for example Cr.
As indicated above, the ion energy should be such that a
substantial proportion of the implanted ions penetrate the
substrate/coating interface and suitable ion energies will, of
course, depend on the ion species used and the nature of the
coating and substrate materials. The ion dose required will
normally be at least 10.sup.14 ions/cm.sup.2.
The following examples illustrate suitable conditions for ion
implantation to obtain increased adhesion of coatings of the kind
referred to.
In these examples, the coated blades were used in a standard
shaving test, some without having been subjected to ion
implantation and the others after this treatment, and the degree of
coating loss was estimated by microscopical examination of
500.times. magnification on a 1 to 10 scale, where 10 = complete
loss of coating and 1 = no loss.
EXAMPLES 29-33
Stainless steel blades with various sputtered coatings were
implanted with 5 .times. 10.sup.15 argon ions per cm.sup.2 using
ion energies such that the distribution peak of the implanted ions
lay just beyond the interface between the sputtered coating and the
blade surface.
__________________________________________________________________________
Coating Thickness Energy of Degree of coating Degree of coating Ex
material of coating A ions loss on blade with- loss on blade after
nm KeV out argon implant- argon implantation ation
__________________________________________________________________________
29 W 50 200 7 3 30 Ta 100 300 6 4 31 Ti 50 100 3 1 32 Au 40 200 4 3
33 V 100 200 7 2
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES 34-37
Stainless steel blades with various sputtered coatings were
implanted with Cr ions so that a substantial proportion of the
implanted ions penetrated beyond the substrate/coating
interface
Coating Coating Energy of Dose of Degree of coat- Degree of coating
Ex Material Thickness Cr ions Cr ions ing loss without loss after
nm KeV Ions/cm.sup.2 Cr implant Cr implant
__________________________________________________________________________
34 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 50 125 2 .times. 10.sup.15 6 4 35 W 35 340 1
.times. 10.sup.16 9 2 36 Mo 40 150 5 .times. 10.sup.15 5 2.5 37 Pt
25 150 5 .times. 10.sup.15 6 2
__________________________________________________________________________
We have also found that the adhesion of polymer coatings to cutting
edges can be improved by ion implantation of the substrate with
ions of elements which are capable of reacting with the substrate
material and/or the polymer which is subsequently applied. The
polymer coating may be directly on a steel cutting edge or on a
thin metal or metallic compound coating previously applied to the
cutting edge, examples of suitable metal or metallic compound
coatings being as mentioned above. The polymer coating most widely
used on razor blade cutting edges is polytetrafluoroethylene and
suitable ions for increasing the adhesion of
polytetrafluoroethylene coatings are Cr and F.
The ion energy used should be such that a substantial proportion of
the implanted ions are within 100A of the substrate surface. The
ion dose required will normally be at least 10.sup.15
ions/cm.sup.2.
The following examples illustrate suitable conditions for ion
implantation to obtain increased adhesion of
polytetrafluoroethylene coatings. In these examples the adhesion of
the polymer was assessed as described for Examples 29-37.
EXAMPLES 38-41
Stainless steel blades having sputtered coatings of W or Mo and
carbon steel blades were implanted with Cr or F ions, and then
coated with polytetrafluoroethylene. The ion energies used were
such as to implant the majority of ions within 100A of the
substrate surface.
Ex Blade Implanted Ion Energy Ion Dose Av. degree of polymer Av.
degree of polymer ion KeV ions/cm.sup.2 loss without implant loss
after implant
__________________________________________________________________________
38 Carbon Steel Cr 10 5 .times. 10.sup.15 3.6 2.9 39 Stainless
steel Cr 30 5 .times. 10.sup.15 10 5.5 with 50 nm W coating 40
Stainless Steel Cr 10 5 .times. 10.sup.15 4.9 3.9 with 50 nm Mo
coating 41 Stainless steel F 10 5 .times. 10.sup.15 5.5 3.0 with 10
nm Mo coating
__________________________________________________________________________
iii. Corrosion resistance
We have found that the corrosion resistance of steel cutting edges,
more particularly that of carbon steel razor blades, can be
improved by implanting ions of elements which are capable of
imparting corrosion resistance when incorporated as alloying
elements into carbon steels, for example, Cr, Ta, Mo, W, Au, and
Pt. Suitable ion energies are determined by substantially the same
factors as referred to in the first part of section (i) above; the
ion dose required will normally be at least 10.sup.15
ions/cm.sup.2.
The following examples illustrate suitable conditions for ion
implantation to obtain improved corrosion resistance in carbon
steel blades.
In these examples, the blades were used in a standard shaving test,
some without having been subjected to ion implantation and the
others after this treatment, and the degree of corrosion of the
blade edges and facets was assessed on a 1-10 scale by
microscopical examination at 500.times. magnification. On this
scale, 1 = no corrosion, 10 = 100% corrosion.
EXAMPLES 42 and 43
Carbon steel blades were implanted with Cr ions.
__________________________________________________________________________
Ion Energy Ion Dose Av. degree of Av. degree of Ex KeV
ions/cm.sup.2 corrosion without corrosion after implantation
implantation
__________________________________________________________________________
42 250 1 .times. 10.sup.16 9 6.5 plus 125 2.5 .times. 10.sup.15 43
400 1 .times. 10.sup.16 plus 280 7 .times. 10.sup.15 4 2 plus 200 5
.times. 10.sup.15
__________________________________________________________________________
* * * * *