U.S. patent number 3,894,647 [Application Number 05/401,838] was granted by the patent office on 1975-07-15 for child-resistant closure.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Sunbeam Plastics Corporation. Invention is credited to Gary Van Montgomery.
United States Patent |
3,894,647 |
Van Montgomery |
July 15, 1975 |
Child-resistant closure
Abstract
A substantially leak-proof and child-resistant combination
closure comprising a container and a cap. The container has a
threaded neck and the cap has a tubular skirt with mating threads
on its inner surface, a disc-like top and resilient annular
shoulder portion. There is a sealing liner beneath the top of the
cap which engages and seals the open end of the container neck. The
cap skirt and the container have cooperating locking means which
are engaged when the cap is turned down to normal closed position.
The locking means function both to render the closure
child-resistant and to stop the relative rotation of the cap onto
the container at a predetermined angular position where the locking
means is effective. The resilient shoulder of the cap flexes to
compensate for tolerance variations in the threads of the cap and
container neck in order to insure that the cap liner seals the neck
of the container.
Inventors: |
Van Montgomery; Gary
(Evansville, IN) |
Assignee: |
Sunbeam Plastics Corporation
(Evansville, IN)
|
Family
ID: |
23589426 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/401,838 |
Filed: |
September 28, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
215/216; 116/72;
215/221 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B65D
50/046 (20130101); B65D 2401/35 (20200501) |
Current International
Class: |
B65D
50/00 (20060101); B65D 50/04 (20060101); B65d
055/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;215/9,221 ;116/72 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Price; William I.
Assistant Examiner: Hart; Ro E.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Leonard; Henry K.
Claims
Having described my invention, I claim:
1. A substantially leak-proof and child-resistant closure
combination, said combination comprising
a. a container having a tubular neck, a hollow body and a generally
inwardly extending shoulder between the upper portion of said body
and the base of said neck,
b. a one-piece cap for said container, said cap having a tubular
skirt, a disc-like top and a resilient annular shoulder portion
means connecting said skirt and said top,
c. a disc-like liner beneath said cap top and engageable with the
end of said container neck for sealing said neck,
d. means comprising mating threads on said neck and said cap skirt
for retaining said cap on said neck,
e. and cooperating locking means on said cap skirt and said
container shoulder engageable when said cap is rotated to normal
closed position relative to said neck and for preventing rotation
beyond normal closed position
f. said shoulder portion means being stretchable for downward
movement of said tubular skirt for compensating for tolerance
variations in said threads, and between said threads and said
locking means.
2. A combination according to claim 1 in which the cooperating
child-resistant locking means comprise a tab on the lower edge of
the cap skirt and a pair of angularly spaced stops on the shoulder
of the container engageable by said tab.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
With the current emphasis that has been placed upon protection of
children of tender ages from harm due to their being able to open
containers of medicines, acids, soaps, etc., development of so
called "child-proof" or, more correctly, "child-resistant"
containers and closures, has been very rapid.
Many of these child-resistant combinations have employed threaded
caps and containers with threaded necks, the caps and containers
being provided with cooperating means which function to prevent the
child of tender years from removing the cap from the container
after it has been seated thereon.
Devices of this type which are practical also must be so designed
as to provide for capping the containers by the use of conventional
capping equipment. Since may products to be so packaged have
previously been packaged in vials or glass bottles with threaded
necks and simple screw-on caps most packaging organizations already
possess capping equipment which is capable of placing such caps
onto bottle necks with a fixed torque so that the caps will be
securely seated on the bottle necks by the capping machines.
However, the tolerances of manufacturing of both the bottles or
vials and the caps or closures are such that even when the caps are
put on by automatic, constant torque capping machines, they do not
all reach the same angular position relative to the containers on
which they are set by the capping machines.
If the caps or closures have internal sealing liners, which
function to render the necks of the containers leak proof,
variations in the degree of tightening of the caps onto the necks
of the bottles may be important as a result of cumulations in the
tolerances. When cork was inexpensive, because it is highly
resilient and does not take a "set" if it is squeezed too tightly,
it frequently was utilized as the main body of the sealing liners
so that it would compensate easily for these variations and would
maintain all of the containers in liquid tight condition even if
the caps or closures were put on various containers with different
torque and thus squeezed the liners to differing degrees.
When the cap of the child-resistant closure is designed, however,
it is necessary that the cap be rotated onto the container to a
distance sufficient to insure that the cooperating means will
engage and thus prevent the cap from being unscrewed by a small
child. However, because of the variations in the tolerances such
caps may be turned onto the containers by the capping machine or by
an adult to positions beyond the positions where the locking means
engage. If this occurs, the liner may be squeezed too tightly and
take a "set." Upon a subsequent replacement of the cap, if it is
not turned on as far, the liner will not expand to maintain the
seal.
In order to avoid the foregoing common problem, it has been
suggested that the cap and container comprise means for stopping
the rotation of the cap onto the container at the precise position
where the child-resistant locking means engage. Again, however,
because of the cumulation of tolerances problem, when the rotation
of the cap is stopped at a fixed position, the liner may not be in
sealing contact with the neck of the container.
It is the object of the instant invention, therefore, to provide a
child-resistant closure for a container in which the cap and
container have cooperating child-resistant locking means engaged at
a certain relative angular position of the cap on the container and
in which the locking means also prevent the cap from being turned
beyond locking position and the cap has a resilient shoulder which
compensates for variations in cumulated tolerances to insure that
the liner seals the container neck when the cap reaches the fixed
or predetermined locking position on the container at which the
child-resistant locking means are engaged.
These and other more specific objects and advantages of a closure
embodying the invention will be better understood from the
specification and from the drawings which follow.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a closure embodying the invention;
FIG. 2 is a fragmentary view in vertical elevation, with parts
broken away of the closure shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a fragmentary, vertical sectional view with parts broken
away taken along the line 3--3 of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary side view in elevation showing how the
child-resistant locking means is disengaged to permit removal of
the cap from the container;
FIG. 5 is a view similar to FIG. 2 and illustrating how the closure
of the combination of the invention may be distorted to insure
sealing engagement of its liner against the open neck of the
container.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
A substantially leak-proof and child-resistant closure combination
according to the invention comprises a container 10 which has a
generally cylindrical body portion 11, a threaded neck 12 and an
annular shoulder 13 joining the wall of the body 11 to the base of
the neck 12.
An inverted cup-shaped cap 14 has a tubular skirt 15, a disc-like
top 16 and a resilient annular shoulder portion 17 connecting the
disc-like top 16 and the skirt 15. The cap 14 also has threads 18
formed on the inner surface of its skirt 15 to mate with the
threads on the neck 12 of the container 10.
A disc-like liner 19 is positioned against the inner side of the
cap top 16 and is of such size as to close and seal the open center
of the container neck 12.
The cap 14 and the container 10 have cooperating child-resistant
locking means which consist of a radially outwardly directed tab 20
at the lower edge of the cap skirt 15 and a pair of stops 21 and 22
formed on the shoulder 13 of the container to be engaged by the tab
20. When the cap 14 is turned onto the container 10, either in its
initial capping or after use, the cap 14 must be rotated a
sufficient distance for the tab 20 to ride up an incline 23 on the
shoulder 13 of the container 10 and then to snap by its own
resiliency downwardly behind the stop 21. This is the closed
position of the closure 14 relative to the container neck 12. The
second stop 22 is angularly spaced beyond the first stop 21 only a
distance sufficient that the tab 20 will drop down between the
stops 21 and 22 and thus prevent the cap 14 from being turned
angularly beyond this normal closed position.
If it were possible to manufacture the cap 14 and the container 10
and its threaded neck 12 without any tolerances in the dimensions,
the cap 10 and the neck 12 could be maintained at proper sizes so
that when the cap 10 is turned to the normal closed position, the
liner 19 is pressed against the open neck 11 with just sufficient
force so as to seal the container. Of course all manufactures on a
production basis must be made with a definite manufacturing
tolerance, say plus or minus 0.005 inch or the like, so that when
these tolerances cumulate if the cap 10 is turned to its normal
closed position, the liner 19 may or may not be in its proper
sealing adjacency to the end of the container neck 12. If the
tolerances cumulate in one direction, the container may not be
sealed at all. If the tolerances cumulate in another direction, it
may not be possible to turn the cap 14 far enough down onto the
neck 12 for the child-resistant locking means comprising the tab 20
and the stop 21 to engage.
If it were economically feasible to utilize natural cork for the
liner 19, it would have sufficient resiliency and compressability
so that it could be made thick enough to engage the end of the
container neck 12 in sealing relationship at both extremes of the
tolerance variations. However, as mentioned above, the cost of cork
has become prohibitive for its use as a liner in large volume
containers such as aspirin bottles, and the like.
In order to compensate for the tolerance variations, the cap 14 of
the invention has the annular shoulder portion 17 so that the liner
19 is brought into sealing engagement with the end of the threaded
neck 12 of the container 10 whether the tolerances result in the
locking tab 21 reaching the normal position as illustrated in FIG.
2 or as illustrated in FIG. 5. It will be observed by comparing the
indicated distances d.sub.1 and d.sub.2, that the extremes of the
tolerance variations are illustrated and that in both conditions,
the tab 20 is positioned between the stops 21 and 22 and the liner
19 is pressed against the end of the neck 12. The annular shoulder
17 is illustrated as being stretched downwardly in FIG. 5 to
compensate for the tolerance variations presumed to exist between
the cap 14 and neck 12 of FIGS. 2 and 5, respectively.
* * * * *