U.S. patent number 3,892,908 [Application Number 05/373,028] was granted by the patent office on 1975-07-01 for coating of solid substrates with magnetically propelled particles.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. Invention is credited to William R. Lovness.
United States Patent |
3,892,908 |
Lovness |
July 1, 1975 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
Coating of solid substrates with magnetically propelled
particles
Abstract
Particulate material is coated onto a solid substrate surface by
exposing the surface in a confined volume containing small magnet
elements mixed with the particulate material, and establishing
within an effective distance of the confined volume, a magnetic
field varying in direction with time. The magnetic field is of
sufficient intensity to propel the magnet elements and the
particulate material at a velocity which causes the mixture to
impinge upon the surface and the particulate material to adhere
thereto as a layer.
Inventors: |
Lovness; William R. (West Saint
Paul, MN) |
Assignee: |
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing
Company (St. Paul, MN)
|
Family
ID: |
23470622 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/373,028 |
Filed: |
June 25, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
428/329; 366/273;
428/900; 118/620; 427/598 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C23C
24/04 (20130101); H01F 41/16 (20130101); Y10T
428/257 (20150115); Y10S 428/90 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C23C
24/00 (20060101); H01F 41/14 (20060101); H01F
41/16 (20060101); C23C 24/04 (20060101); B44d
001/094 () |
Field of
Search: |
;117/93.2,109,DIG.1,DIG.8,234,131,17.5,17 ;118/57,76,620
;51/163,164,164.5 ;259/99,DIG.46 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Husack; Ralph
Assistant Examiner: Newsome; John H.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Alexander, Sell, Steldt and
Delahunt
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A process for coating particulate material upon the surface of a
substrate comprising:
exposing said substrate surface in a confined volume to a plurality
of disconnected and independently movable small permanent magnet
elements and said particulate material, and
establishing within said volume, in addition to the magnetic field
of said permanent magnet elements, a magnetic field varying in
direction with time and of sufficient intensity to impart movement
to the magnetic elements to cause the particulate material to
impinge upon and to coat said exposed substrate surface.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said established magnetic field
rotates about a central axis.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said magnetic elements have an
electromagnetic field of at least about 100 gauss.
4. The process of said claim 1 wherein said magnetic elements have
a magnetization of at least 10 gauss per gram.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein said magnetic elements are barium
ferrite.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein said particulate material is
powdered aluminum.
7. A coated substrate comprising a substrate having a surface
coating of a multitude of flattened particles adhered to said
surface, said coating containing magnet elements.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the coating of solid substrates with
various materials. More particularly, the present invention is
directed to the coating of various particulate materials on the
surface of solid substrates by utilizing particles propelled by
magnetic forces.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Numerous techniques are known in the art for coating solid
articles. An article may be coated to modify its surface properties
such as corrosion resistance, electrical contact resistance,
reflectivity, color, abrasion resistance, solderability,
coefficient of friction, etc.
The common methods of coating are chemical reduction,
electroplating, spraying, hot dipping, mechanical plating and
vacuum metallizing. Chemical reduction requires stringent
temperature control, generally produces noxious fumes, and is not
economical. The quality of chemically reduced deposits is inferior
to that of either electro-plated metal deposits or vacuum-metalized
deposits with respect to dimensional control, durability and
reflectivity. The processing temperatures involved with chemical
reduction practices generally exceed the heat-distortion point of
most plastics, thereby precluding the use of this process for
coating plastics.
Electroplating is limited in the number of metals which can be
plated, causes hydrogen embrittlement and has the disadvantage of
requiring a conductive substrate, thereby also precluding the
coating of plastic by this technique unless the plastic substrate
is provided with a conductive surface.
Metal spraying, applicable primarily for heavy deposits, produces a
coating which is porous, dimensionally nonuniform, and usually
requires thermal treatment to improve adherence. The finish of
sprayed metal coatings is rough and unattractive.
Commercial hot-dipped coatings are limited to low melting metals
such as zinc, tin, lead and aluminum. Additionally, hot dipping
requires an extremely clean, grease- and oxide- free surface to
obtain a uniform adherent coating.
The process of mechanical plating has been known for perhaps a
quarter of a century. The broad principles of the process are well
known; see, e.g., British Pat. No. 534,888, U.S. Pat. Nos.
2,689,808, and Re. 23,861, and other publications. The process is
typically carried out by placing in a tumbling barrel metallic
parts to be plated, plating metals in the form of minute malleable
particles, impact media such as glass beads and cullet, water, and,
optionally, a chemical promoter. As the tumbling barrel is rotated,
the plating metal particles are hammered against the surface of the
metallic parts to be plated, the impact media and the parts
themselves serving to flatten the metal particles into a continuous
coat. Mechanical plating may produce adequate results but is
generally limited to only a few metals such as tin, zinc, cadmium,
and brass.
Mechanical plating may also be accomplished by projecting an air
borne mixture of coatable particles and hard peening particles onto
a substrate causing hammering of the coatable particles on the
surface as a layer. Such a process is limited by the trajectory of
the stream of the air borne mixture to relatively flat and
uniformly shaped substrates.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
In accordance with the process of the invention, particulate
material is plated on a substrate surface by exposing the surface
in a confined volume containing small magnet elements mixed with
the particulate material and establishing within an effective
distance of the confined volume a magnetic field varying in
direction with time.
Without being bound by any theory or scientific explanation of
precisely how the present invention functions, it is believed that
the magnetic field imparts motion to the magnet elements which in
turn imparts a motion to the particulate material mixed therewith.
These materials then impinge upon the surface of the substrate in a
sufficient amount and with sufficient force to clean the surface
and hammer the particulate material thereon to form a uniform
coating. Microscopic examination of the coated surface, prior to
completion of the coating, indeed reveals a multitude of flattened
particles adhered to the substrate surface, in some cases.
The present invention provides a coating process which permits
simple or very complex shaped articles of plastic, metal, or any
hard material to be coated with any of a variety of materials
including plastics, metals, inorganic materials and others. The
process utilizes simple economical apparatus and produces no
undesirable waste products which require removal or disposal. The
process, which requires no toxic chemicals, does not utilize molten
metal and therefore eliminating the danger of burns and fires
caused thereby. The process can be used to coat fragile articles,
very complex articles, and articles not capable of being coated by
conventional techniques. The process provides uniform coatings of
good quality from very thin to very thick, with no modification
thereof merely by continuing coating for the appropriate time. No
hydrogen embrittlement is produced by the process of the present
invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a coating apparatus in accordance with the
invention; and
FIG. 2 is a vertical section view, taken at lines 2--2 of the
apparatus shown in FIG. 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the apparatus utilized for coating in
accordance with the invention is comprised of a magnetic field
generating device 10 capable of producing a magnetic field which
varies in direction with time, small magnet elements 11 capable of
being moved by the magnetic field, and particulate material 12
which is to be coated. A container 13 confines the mixture of
magnet elements' particulate material 12, and substrate 14 being
coated, in a predetermined volume. (It should be noted that
magnetic field generating device 10 is shown as a solid annulus
merely for purposes of illustration, and it will actually have
other parts such as wires, cores, etc. as will be apparent from the
description which follows.)
The magnetic field may be generated by means of osillators,
oscillator/amplifier combinations, solid-state pulsating devices,
motor generators, and mechanical vibrators. The magnetic field may
also be provided by means of air or metal core coils, stator
devices or the like. The preferred device for generating the
magnetic field is capable of generating a rotating magnetic field.
With such a device, the field which is generated rotates about a
central axis defined by the device itself.
A preferred device for generating such a rotating magnetic field,
is described in assignee's copending application to Lovness and
Feldhaus, Ser. No. 334,000, filed Feb. 20, 1973, the disclosure of
which is incorporated herein by reference. This device has at least
four overlapping electrical coils arranged in a generally circular
pattern of opposed pairs and energized by two or more out-of-phase
sources of alternating current so that opposed coils are of
opposite polarity and of the same phase. A rudimentary version of
this type of field generator device is the stator of a two pole
alternating current electric motor.
The container or surface for confining the magnet elements and
particulate coating material within a predetermined area should be
formed of a non-magnetic material such as glass, synthetic organic
plastics, for example, polytetrafluoroethylene (e.g., "Teflon"),
polyethylene, polypropylene, and the like, ceramics, non-magnetic
metals such as stainless steels, bronze, lead, etc.
Any one of a variety of particulate materials of varying degrees of
hardness and shape is contemplated for use as the coating material
of the present invention. For the most part, the coating materials
are metal powders but other materials have also been found suitable
for coating. Illustrative of metal powders which may be coated are
aluminum, iron, lead, zinc, cadmium, copper, indium, tantalum,
chromium, magnesium, nickel, tungsten, silver, and gold.
Illustrative metal alloy powders which have been found useful for
coating include stainless steels, aluminum/zinc alloys, and
tin/lead alloys. Non-metal powders found useful for coating in the
present invention include graphite, molybdenum disulfide, and
organic resins such as polytetrafluoroethylene and polyvinyl
chloride.
The shape of the particulate material being coated need not be in
any particular form since it has been found virtually all shapes
will provide a suitable coating, e.g., round, flake, etc. The
particulate material may range in size from 0.1 micron or less in
maximum dimension to several hundred microns or more; preferably
the particle size is within the range of 0.5 to 50 microns. The
mass of each magnet element is preferably at least twice the mass
of each individual fragment of particulate material being coated or
else very large magnetic forces are required to provide uniform and
permanent coatings.
As previously mentioned, the process of the invention utilizes
small magnet elements, each of which is an individual minute
permanent magnet and hence susceptible to the influence of a moving
magnetic field. Such elements include gamma iron oxide (Fe.sub.2
0.sub.3), hard barium ferrite, (Ba0.6Ee.sub.2 0.sub.3), particulate
aluminum- nickel- cobalt alloys, or mixtures thereof. Suitable
magnet elements have been found to have a magnetization (M) in
excess of 10 gauss per gram, magnetization being a measure of the
magnetic field intensity of the material from which the particles
are prepared. Hard barium ferrite has a magnetization of about 70
gauss/gm and gamma iron oxide has a magnetization of about 50
gauss/gm. Also, it has been found that suitable magnet elements
should have a magnetic coercivity (defined as the opposite sign
field necessary to reduce the magnetization to zero) greater than
the magnetic field (H) applied to cause physical movement of the
element. Magnetic fields of about 100 to about 600 oersteds and
higher have been used to move the particles. Hard barium ferrite
has a magnetic coercivity of about 3000 oersteds and the gamma iron
oxide has a magnetic coercivity of about 300 oersteds. Magnet
elements having a magnetic coercivity less than about 100 oersteds
have been found not to be particularly suited for use in the
invention because application of external magnetic fields
sufficiently strong to move the elements causes
demagnetization.
The size of the magnet elements will vary over a considerable range
depending upon the coatable particulate material and upon the
particular substrate being coated. As previously stated, the mass
of the magnet elements being used should be at least twice the mass
of the particulate material being coated. Typically, the size of
the magnet elements will vary between 1 micron in maximum extent to
about several hundred microns or more. The size of the magnet
elements should be sufficiently small to enter any openings or
perforations in the article being coated, if it is desired to coat
the inner surface of such openings.
The amount of magnet elements used with the coatable particulate
material will also vary depending upon the coatable particulate
material being used and upon the substrate being coated.
Functionally stated, the total mass of magnet elements is that
sufficient to cause the coatable particulate material to impinge
upon the surface of the substrate being coated and to provide a
coating thereon. Since the magnet elements should be at least twice
the mass of the coatable particulate material, the total mass of
the magnet elements will likewise be at least twice the mass of the
coatable particulate material. Usually an excess of the amount of
coatable particulate material desired to be coated on the substrate
is used or eventually added during the coating operation.
For some applications, other substances may be used with the magnet
elements coatable particulate material mixture. For example, with
some substrates it may be desired to have the additional abrasive
action of a suitable abrasive material in the mixture to provide a
smooth clean finish to the surface being coated. Additionally, the
mixture may contain hard dense particles such as glass beads, metal
shot, ceramic beads and the like to aid in hammering the
particulate material onto the surface of the substrate.
Of particular advantage, is the fact that two or more different
coatable materials can be coated simultaneously by the process of
the invention. This feature permits the simultaneous coating of two
metals or of a non-metal and a metal together in composite layers.
In this manner, composite layers can be made from any of a wide
variety of starting mixtures.
The process of the invention is generally carried out under normal
atmospheric conditions; however, for some materials (either
coatable materials or substrates) it may be desirable to coat in an
inert atmosphere such as dry nitrogen, argon, or helium, or to
carry out the entire operation in a vacuum or near vacumm. For
example, when utilizing magnesium powder as the coatable
particulate material, it is preferred to carry out the process in a
dry inert atmosphere. Additionally, while it is generally
unnecessary, various coating additives or promoters may also be
utilized in the process. Such materials may provide a more uniform
coating for some coatable particulate materials and for some
substrates. Such additives and promoters are well known in the
mechanical plating art and useful in the present process.
Another remarkable advantage of the invention is that the
substrates to be coated do not generally require a clean surface.
In other words, the substrate may have a surface layer of rust,
scale, paint or grease, before it is subjected to the magnetic
particle/coatable particulate material mixture and yet be coated
with a uniform layer. Extremely thick layers of surface
contamination are preferably removed prior to commencement of
coating to shorten the amount of time required to achieve such
coating.
In some instances the magnet elements themselves may actually coat
onto the substrate along with the material nominally being coated.
If such a situation occurs and is not desired, magnet elements
encased in a protective shell such as a hard polymeric resin
coating may be used. A typical coating is of polyurethane.
Substrates which can be coated or plated in accordance with the
present invention include any hard material. Such materials include
metals, alloys, wood, plastic, ceramics and the like. Such
substrates may have any shape including "blind" holes, threads,
sharp angles, knurls, and the like. As long as the surface of such
an article is in communication with the coatable particulate
material and magnet elements, it will be coated.
The following examples illustrate the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
Powdered aluminum was coated on a copper substrate surface by
utilizing a rotating magnetic field generating device and barium
ferrite magnetic particles. The rotating magnetic field generating
device, originally the stator of a 1/2 horsepower electric motor,
was a ring-like structure having a 5.5 inch outer diameter and a
2.8 inch inner diameter, with windings formed of insulated copper
wire forming a two pole single phase arrangement.
A 500 ml "Pyrex" glass beaker to contain magnet elements and the
aluminum particles was situated within the opening of the stator
described above. A 1/2 inch .times. 1 inch .times. 0.010 inch strip
of copper to be plated was held on the wall of the beaker by a
strip of double faced pressure sensitive tape. The magnet elements
were barium ferrite speaker magnets which had been crushed to
provide a particle size which passed through a U.S. Standard Screen
mesh size of 12 and were retained on a 40 mesh (approximately 0.4-
2 mm). The barium ferrite particles had been previously magnetized
by brief exposure in a 11,000 gauss magnetic field.
The powdered aluminum was that sold by U.S. Bronze Powder Company
as "Venus Aluminum Powder Atomized No. 610 medium mesh" having a
particle size of about 20 microns and a bulk powder density of 1.0
g/cc. About 2.5 grams of powdered aluminum were used.
Coating was accomplished by energizing the rotating field
generating device to an operating current of 10 amps for a period
of one hour. A 3 mil thick coating having a matte finish uniformly
covering the exposed surface article was produced.
EXAMPLE 2-168
Utilizing the device described above the substrate shown below was
coated with the coatable particulate material shown in the
table.
__________________________________________________________________________
Ex. No. Substrate Coating Material
__________________________________________________________________________
2 aluminum aluminum (Same as Ex. 1) 3 anodized aluminum " 4
stainless steel " 5 nickel " 6 copper " 7 titanium " 8 aluminized
steel " 9 303 stainless steel " 10 zinc " 11 magnesium " 12 430
stainless steel " 13 glass " 14 ceramic " 15 nylon " 16 polystyrene
" 17 polytetrafluoroethylene " 18 polycarbonate " 19 styrene
polymer " 20 polyethylene " 21 aluminum barium ferrite (Magnets of
alloy Ex. 1) 22 anodized aluminum " 23 steel " 24 nickel " 25
copper " 26 titanium " 27 aluminized steel " 28 zinc " 29 magnesium
" 30 430 stainless steel " 31 glass " 32 ceramic " 33 nylon " 34
polystyrene " 35 polytetrafluoroethylene " 36 polycarbonate barium
ferrite (Magnets of alloy Ex. 1) 37 styrene polymer " 38
polyethylene " 39 aluminum tin (2.5 micron) 40 anodized aluminum "
41 stainless steel " 42 nickel " 43 copper " 44 titanium " 45
aluminized steel " 46 303 stainless steel " 47 zinc " 48
polystyrene " 49 aluminum lead (6 micron) 50 steel " 51 nickel " 52
copper " 53 titanium " 54 aluminized steel " 55 303 stainless steel
" 56 zinc " 57 aluminum zinc (4 micron) 58 anodized aluminum " 59
steel " 60 nickel " 61 copper " 62 titanium " 63 aluminized steel "
64 303 stainless steel " 65 zinc " 66 polystyrene " 67 aluminum
cadmium (7 micron) 68 anodized aluminum " 69 steel " 70 nickel " 71
copper " 72 titanium " 73 aluminized steel " 74 303 stainless steel
" 75 zinc " 76 aluminum copper (8 micron) 77 anodized aluminum " 78
steel " 79 nickel " 80 copper " 81 titanium " 82 aluminized steel "
83 303 stainless steel " 84 430 stainless steel " 85 glass " 86
aluminum graphite 87 anodized aluminum " 88 steel " 89 nickel " 90
copper " 91 titanium " 92 aluminized steel " 93 303 stainless steel
" 94 zinc " 95 aluminum molybdenum disulfide (microsize powder) 96
anodized aluminum " 97 steel " 98 nickel " 99 copper " 100 titanium
" 101 aluminized steel " 102 303 stainless steel " 103 430
stainless steel " 104 aluminum indium (200 mesh) 105 anodized
aluminum " 106 steel " 107 nickel " 108 copper " 109 titanium " 110
aluminized steel " 111 303 stainless steel " 112 aluminum tantalum
(4.8 micron) 113 anodized aluminum " 114 steel " 115 copper " 116
titanium " 117 aluminized steel " 118 303 stainless steel " 119 430
stainless steel " 120 aluminum chromium 121 anodized aluminum " 122
steel " 123 nickel " 124 copper " 125 titanium " 126 aluminized
steel " 127 303 stainless steel " 128 430 stainless steel " 129
aluminum tin (50)/- lead (50) 130 anodized aluminum " 131 steel "
132 nickel " 133 copper " 134 titanium " 135 aluminized steel " 136
303 stainless steel " 137 zinc " 138 aluminum polytetra-
fluoroethylene 139 anodized aluminum " 140 steel " 141 nickel " 142
copper " 143 titanium " 144 aluminized steel " 145 303 stainless
steel " 146 430 stainless steel " 147 aluminum silver 148 steel "
149 nickel " 150 copper " 151 aluminized steel " 152 zinc " 153 ABS
plastic " 154 polystyrene " 155 aluminum gold (2.3 micron) 156
anodized aluminum " 157 steel " 158 titanium " 159 aluminized steel
" 160 303 stainless steel " 161 ceramic " 162 nickel " 163
molybdenum nickel (0.2% max. + 200 mesh 2.0% max. + 325 mesh) 164
aluminum magnesium (-400 mesh) 165 glass " 166 steel aluminum/zinc-
alloy 167 steel tungsten carbide/ cobalt alloy (-325 mesh) 168
aluminum iron (-325 mesh)
__________________________________________________________________________
The degree of adhesion of each coating tabulated above was
qualitatively measured by a "tape test," using a 3/4 inch wide and
11/2 inch long strip of pressure-sensitive adhesive tape sold under
the trade designation "Scotch Brand Magic Mending Tape" by the 3M
Company. For the test, one-half inch of the strip adjacent one end
was adherently bonded with finger pressure to the coated surface,
and then the free end of the strip was doubled back on itself at
180.degree. and slowly pulled away to completely remove the tape
from the article. An adequately adhered coating was one which did
not split or fail under the test. The coatings in all of the
examples remained intact when subjected to the tape test just
described, except for those of graphite and molybdenum disulfide
(Examples 86-103) which, of course, would not be expected to do so,
since they have a weakly cohesive nature.
EXAMPLES 169-174
The following examples show the effective weight ratio of
particulate material to magnet elements useful in the invention.
For each example, a copper piece was attached inside the container
consisting of an 8 ounce paper drinking cup which also contained
100 grams of magnet elements. The rotating magnetic field
generating device was operated at 11 amperes for 30 minutes in each
case. The amount of aluminum powder used for each example is shown
in the table below. The rotating field generating device, the
copper pieces, the magnet elements, and the aluminum powder are all
described in Example 1.
After the coating was accomplished, the coating thickness and
weight were measured. Results are as follows: Ex. Powder Coating
Thickness Coating Weight No. Weight (g) (mil) (g)
______________________________________ 169 2 .25 .0016 170 5 .26
.0022 171 10 .27 .0025 172 20 .25 .0016 173 40 .22 .0009 174 80 .15
.0009 ______________________________________
As can be seen, the efficacy of coating is reduced somewhat if the
weight of particulate material is greater than about 1/10th the
weight of the magnet elements, indicating that it is preferred to
maintain a relatively small amount of particulate material with
respect to the magnet elements.
* * * * *