U.S. patent number 3,889,151 [Application Number 05/384,882] was granted by the patent office on 1975-06-10 for energizing technique for electroluminescent devices.
This patent grant is currently assigned to RCA Corporation. Invention is credited to Joseph John Hanak, Peter David Southgate.
United States Patent |
3,889,151 |
Hanak , et al. |
June 10, 1975 |
Energizing technique for electroluminescent devices
Abstract
An energizing voltage provided by a DC voltage source in series
with a pulse generator provides unexpectedly high brightness of
light emitted from an electroluminescent device. The DC voltage in
itself has a magnitude which results in insignificantly small
current through and light emission by the electroluminescent
device, which may have a non-linear current-voltage
characteristic.
Inventors: |
Hanak; Joseph John (Trenton,
NJ), Southgate; Peter David (Princeton, NJ) |
Assignee: |
RCA Corporation (New York,
NY)
|
Family
ID: |
23519142 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/384,882 |
Filed: |
August 2, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
315/170; 313/494;
315/169.3; 315/176; 345/76; 345/208; 315/169.1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H05B
33/08 (20130101); Y02B 20/30 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H05B
33/08 (20060101); H05B 33/02 (20060101); H05b
037/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;250/213R ;313/494
;315/169TV,169R,170,175,176 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Rolinec; R. V.
Assistant Examiner: Dahl; Lawrence J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Norton; Edward J. Seligsohn; George
J.
Government Interests
The invention herein described was made in the course of or under a
contract or subcontract thereunder with the Department of the Army.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. The combination comprising:
a. a given electroluminescent device having a non-linear
current-voltage characteristic that a first voltage there across
having a first level of a given polarity results in an
insignificantly small current therethrough and an insignificant
brightness of light emitted thereby and a second voltage
thereacross having a second level of said given polarity which is
higher than said first level results in a significantly large
current therethrough and a significant brightness of light emitted
therby, and
b. power supply means coupled across said device, including a DC
voltage supply and a pulse generator connected in series with each
other, said DC voltage supply supplying a continuous DC voltage
magnitude of said first level and given polarity, and said pulse
generator generating a series of intermittent DC pulses at a given
duty cycle which is not in excess of one percent, with each pulse
having said given polarity and an amplitude equal to the difference
between said second level and said first level.
2. The combination defined in claim 1, wherein said first level DC
voltage has a magnitude sufficient by itself to provide an electric
field across said device in the order of seventy-five volts per
micrometer.
3. The combination defined in claim 2, wherein said
electroluminescent device comprises a film about two micrometers
thick and said first level DC voltage is substantially one-hundred
fifty volts.
4. The combination defined in claim 3, wherein said film is a zinc
sulfide host doped with an activator element forming a suitable
light emitting center.
5. The combination defined in claim 3, wherein said second level
voltage is between two-hundred sixty volts and three-hundred
volts.
6. The combination defined in claim 3, wherein said second level
voltage is substantially three-hundred volts and each pulse has a
duration in the range of one to twenty microseconds.
7. The combination defined in claim 3, wherein said second level
voltage is substantially two-hundred eighty volts and each pulse
has a duration in the range of one to one-hundred microseconds.
8. The combination defined in claim 3, wherein said second level
voltage is substantially two-hundred sixty volts and each pulse has
a duration in the range of three to one-hundred microseconds.
9. The combination defined in claim 1, wherein said brightness is
at a maximum when said pulses each have a duration equal to a given
value at said given duty cycle, and wherein each of the pulses
generated by said pulse generator has a duration substantially
equal to said given value.
10. The combination defined in claim 1, wherein said given duty
cycle is in the order of one-tenth of one percent.
11. A method for energizing an electroluminescent device comprising
the step of:
applying an energizing voltage across said device composed of a
series of DC pulses of given amplitude and given polarity occurring
at a given duty cycle which is not in excess of one percent, said
series of pulses riding on a continuous DC pedestal of a given
magnitude and said given polarity.
12. The method defined in claim 11, wherein the brightness of light
emitted from said device is a maximum when the duration of each
said pulses has a given value, and wherein said duration has
substantially said given value.
Description
This invention relates to electroluminescent devices and, more
particularly, to an improved method and means for operating such
electroluminescent devices.
As is known, selected light emitting materials, such as phosphors,
when placed within the influence of an electric field, are
energized by the field to emit light. Electroluminescent phosphors
will display the phenomenon of electroluminescence under either Ac
or DC potential excitation. However, the process may be a
relatively inefficient one from the point of view of the brightness
of the light produced. In order to improve this efficiency, and
obtain greater brightness, certain types of special waveform
energizing voltages have been suggested by the prior art.
More specifically, U.S. Pat. No. 2,972,692, which issued February
21, 1961 to Thornton, suggests the use of superimposed continuous
AC and DC voltages of appropriate values to provide the required
energizing electric field. On the other hand, U.S. Pat. No.
3,165,667, issued Jan. 12, 1965 to C. H. Haake, suggests the use of
a superimposed continuous-wave high-frequency AC voltage and pulses
from a pulse generator to provide the required energizing electric
field for the electroluminescent device.
In accordance with the present invention, it has been discovered
that an energizing voltage for a non-linear current-voltage
characteristic electroluminescent device provided by a low-level DC
voltage, which in itself results in an insignificantly small
current through the device and an insignificant brightness of light
emitted thereby, and a series of pulses of appropriate values from
a suitable pulse generator connected in series with the DC voltage
source to obtain a signficantly large current through the device,
provides an unexpected increase in the brightness of the light
emitted from the electroluminescent device.
This and other features and advantages of the present invention
will become more apparent from the following detailed description
taken together with the accompanying drawing, in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates an experimental embodiment of the present
invention which demonstrates the benefits thereof, and
FIGS. 2 and 3 are graphs which illustrate the operating results of
the experimental embodiment shown in FIG. 1.
Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown electroluminescent panel 10,
pulse generator 12, DC voltage supply 14 and switch 16.
Electroluminescent panel 10 is composed of a glass substrate 18,
which may have a surface area of about 3 millimeter square. On this
surface area is disposed lower electrode 20. The active element 22
of electroluminescent panel 10 may consist of a layer, about 2
micrometers thick, of sputtered zinc sulfide, forming a hast, doped
with an activator element, forming a suitablt light emitting
center, such as manganese. In the present example, the zinc sulfide
hast was doped with 0.7 mole percent manganese and 0.3 mole percent
copper. Cermet 24, also about 2 micrometers thick, which acts as a
current-limiting resistor, is disposed, as shown, in series with
active element 22 and upper electrode 26. The cermet contained
about ten volume percent nickel and the remainder SiO.sub.2.
In the switch position shown, with wiper 28 of switch 16 connected
to upper pole 30 thereof, the respective outputs from pulse
generator 12 and DC voltage supply 14 are connected in series
between lower electrode 20 and upper electrode 26 of
electroluminescent panel 10. In the other position of switch 16,
with wiper 28 of switch 16 connected to its lower pole 32, the
output of pulse generator 12 alone is connected between electrodes
20 and 26 of electroluminescent panel 10.
For experimental purposes, the magnitude of the DC voltage supply
14 was set at a fixed value of 150 volts, which in itself provides
a negligible current through panel 10. However, both the amplitude
and duration of pulses generated by pulse generator 12 were capable
of being independently varied. In particular, pulse generator 12
was capable of generating a series of pulses, each of which had a
duration which could be varied from a value extending from 1
microsecond to more than 100 microseconds, and each of which had an
amplitude which could be varied from a value extending below 110
volts to a value of at least 300 volts. In all cases, pulse
generator 12 is operated at a duty cycle of one-tenth of one
percent.
Graph 30a of FIG. 2 is a plot of the relative average brightness of
electroluminescent panel 10 as a function of the pulse duration or
length in microseconds for the case where wiper 28 of switch 16 is
connected to upper pole 30 thereof and the total voltage between
electrodes 20 and 26 is 300 volts (the sum of a 150 volt DC
pedestal bias voltage from DC voltage supply 14 and a 150 volt
amplitude pulse from pulse generator 12). Since the active element
22 has a thickness of about 2 micrometers and is the main resistive
element, the total electric field is about 150 volts per
micrometer, with the output from DC voltage supply 14 supplying a
75 volt per micrometer portion of this total.
Graph 30b is a plot obtained when the total voltage between
electrodes 20 and 26 remains at 300 volts, but wiper 28 of switch
16 is switched to lower pole 32 thereof (so that DC voltage supply
14 is disconnected) and pulse generator 12 is adjusted to provide a
pulse amplitude equal to the entire total voltage of 300 volts.
Graphs 32a and 34a correspond with graph 30a in all respects except
that the total voltage between electrodes 20 and 26 in the case of
graph 32a is 280 volts and the total voltage between electrodes 20
and 26 in the case of graph 34a is 260 volts. Thus, in the case of
graph 32a, the pulse amplitude from pulse generator 12 is 130 volts
and in the case of graph 34a the pulse amplitude from pulse
generator 12 is 110 volts, since the magnitude of the output from
DC voltage supply 14 remains at 150 volts. In a similar manner,
graphs 32b and 34b correspond with graph 30b. Specifically, the
amplitude of each pulse from pulse generator 12 in the case of
graphs 32b is 280 volts, the total voltage applied across
electrodes 20 and 26, and in the case of graph 34b, the amplitude
of each pulse is 260 volts, the total voltage applied across
electrodes 20 and 26.
It will be noted from FIG. 2 that in all cases as the pulse length
or duration increases from a minimum, the brightness rises to a
maximum; after which, as the pulse length is further increased, the
brightness falls off. However, from the point of view of the
present invention, what is most noteworthy is the fact that the
maximum brightness of each of graphs 30a, 32a and 34a,
respectively, is significantly higher than the maximum of
corresponding graphs 30b, 32b, and 34b, respectively. Thus, an
energizing voltage composed of a pulse riding on a DC pedestal to
provide a given total energizing voltage results in a significantly
higher brightness of emitted light being achieved than in the case
when this total given energizing voltage is applied solely in
pulses. Furthermore, the use of the pedestal makes it possible to
employ pulses of lower voltage amplitudes.
It can be further noted from FIG. 2 that the duration of the pulse
length which results in maximum brightness for each of graphs 30a,
32a and 34a, respectively, is shorter than the corresponding pulse
length which results in maximum brightness for each of
corresponding graphs 30b, 32b and 34b, respectively. In fact, the
brightness achieved in graphs 30a exceeds that obtainable from
graph 30b over a pulse length range extending from a minimum of one
microsecond to a maximum of about twenty microseconds. Similarly,
the brightness achieved with graph 32a exceeds that obtainable with
graph 32b over the entire pulse length range extending from a
minimum of one microsecond to more than 100 microseconds. In the
case of graphs 34a and 34b, the brightness of graph 34a exceeds
that of graph 34b over the entire range of 34a extending from a
minimum value of less than 3 microseconds to a maximum value of
more than 100 microseconds.
Graph 40a of FIG. 3 illustrates a typical waveform of a voltage
pulse of given duration riding on a DC pedestal. In particular, the
DC pedestal has a magnitude of 150 volts and the pulse has an
amplitude of 150 volts, to provide a total voltage during the
presence of the pulse of 300 volts. Graph 40b is identical to 40 a
in all respects except that there is no pedestal and the amplitude
of the pulse if 300 volts. Graph 42a shows the waveform of the
relative brightness of the light being emitted from
electroluminescent panel 10 when energized by waveform 40a, while
graph 42b shows the waveform of this relative brightness when
electroluminescent panel 10 is energized by voltage waveform 40b.
It can be seen that the rise time of graph 42a is significantly
faster, as well as higher, than graph 42a Thus, equal or even
greater brightness can be achieved with the pedestal employing
pulses of shorter duration. As is known, the use of pulses of
shorter duration can extend the lifetime of electroluminescent
devices.
In the actual practice of the present invention, switch 16 is not
required, because the use of the DC voltage pedestal would be
employed at all times. Since this is true, the amplitude of the
pulse from pulse generator required to achieve any given total
energizing voltage is equal to only the difference between this
given total energizing voltage and the magnitude of the DC pedestal
voltage. Thus, pulses of lower amplitude may be employed. This
permits the use of a smaller, less costly pulse generator than
otherwise would be required.
* * * * *