U.S. patent number 3,888,760 [Application Number 05/326,615] was granted by the patent office on 1975-06-10 for avoiding heat exchanger fouling after crude oil desalting.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Chevron Research Company. Invention is credited to Wayne A. Ebert.
United States Patent |
3,888,760 |
Ebert |
June 10, 1975 |
Avoiding heat exchanger fouling after crude oil desalting
Abstract
Heat-exchanger fouling, for example in a crude-oil heat-
exchanger train, is reduced by flashing the oil after desalting and
then heating the oil further in a heat exchanger, instead of
heating the oil in a heat exchanger immediately after desalting and
before flashing. Preferably the flashing step is carried out by
reducing the pressure on the oil to a pressure below the vapor
pressure of free water at the flash-drum temperature. Preferably,
the flash-drum temperature is between 250.degree. and
350.degree.F.
Inventors: |
Ebert; Wayne A. (Dublin,
CA) |
Assignee: |
Chevron Research Company (San
Francisco, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
26880428 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/326,615 |
Filed: |
January 26, 1973 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
184738 |
Sep 29, 1971 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
208/48R; 208/187;
208/251R |
Current CPC
Class: |
C10G
31/08 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C10G
31/08 (20060101); C10G 31/00 (20060101); C10g
017/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;208/48AA,251,187
;203/7,28,39 ;23/277 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
3390073 |
June 1968 |
Godar et al. |
3565791 |
February 1971 |
Urquhart et al. |
3798153 |
March 1974 |
Arndt, Jr. et al. |
|
Other References
NPRA Question and Answer Session, Dallas, Texas, 1968, pp. 140-141.
.
NPRA Question and Answer Session, Dallas, Texas, 1971, Oil Gas
Journal, May 1, 1972, pp. 118-124..
|
Primary Examiner: Gantz; Delbert E.
Assistant Examiner: Nelson; Juanita M.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Magdeburger; G. F. Davies; R. H.
DeJonghe; T. G.
Parent Case Text
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation-in-part of my application Ser.
No. 184,738, filed Sept. 29, 1971 now abandoned.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. In a process which comprises heating and desalting and then
further heating hydrocarbonaceous oil using heat exchangers and a
desalter, the improvement which comprises flashing the oil to
remove water after desalting the oil and before further heating of
the oil in any heat exchanger.
2. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the oil is
substantially dehydrated in the flashing step by flashing the oil
into a flash drum at a pressure below the vapor pressure of free
water, at the temperature of the liquid in the bottom part of the
flash drum.
3. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the oil is a whole
crude petroleum oil.
4. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the oil is heated
in a heat exchanger ahead of the desalting step to a temperature
between 100.degree. and 350.degree.F., and between 0.1 and 5 pounds
of water per 100 pounds of oil are injected into the oil before it
passes through said heat exchanger.
5. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the flash is
carried out at a temperature between 250.degree. and
350.degree.F.
6. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the flash is
carried out at a temperature between 260.degree. and 320.degree.F.,
and the crude oil is an Arabian light crude oil.
7. A process for reducing the fouling of crude oil distillation
unit preheat exchangers downstream of a desalting step, which
process comprises:
a. heating feed crude oil to a temperature between 150.degree. and
450.degree.F. by passing the oil through heat exchangers at a
pressure between 20 and 500 psig, and transferring heat from a hot
fluid across the tube walls to said oil;
b. removing salts from the oil in a desalter by contacting the oil
with water and then separating the oil from the water at a pressure
between 20 and 500 psig, and a temperature between 150.degree. and
450.degree.F.;
c. flashing off remaining water from the oil, before further
heating of the oil in any heat exchanger, by reducing the pressure
below the vapor pressure of free water at the temperature of the
flashing step; and
d. then further heating the oil to a temperature above the flashing
temperature and between about 350.degree. and 900.degree.F. by
passing the oil through heat exchangers and transferring heat from
a hot fluid across the heat exchange tube walls to the oil.
8. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the gravity of the
crude oil is below about 36.degree.API and wherein there is no
heating of the crude oil by hot oil injection between the desalting
and flashing steps.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to reducing fouling in heaters,
particularly heat exchangers, used to heat oil.
The term "fouling" is used herein to mean deposition of material on
heat transfer surfaces, usually with subsequent reduction in heat
transfer coefficient, and usually also with an increase in pressure
drop.
Essentially all oil refineries have crude oil distillation units.
The crude oil distillation units basically consist of crude oil
preheat exchangers, a desalter, a furnace, and a crude oil
distillation column. The present invention is particularly
concerned with reducing fouling in the crude oil preheat
exchangers, although the process of the present invention can be
applied to other heat exchanger surfaces where desalting is
involved.
The basic function of a crude oil distillation unit is to split
crude oil into different boiling-range fractions of the crude oil
for further-downstream processing or for final use. To carry out
splitting of the crude oil into various fractions by distillation,
the crude oil must be heated to a high temperature to allow
substantial vaporization as required for the crude oil
distillation.
The heating of the crude oil ahead of the crude oil distillation
column is generally carried out by heat exchange with hot products
from the crude oil distillation column, and finally by heating in a
furnace. The heat exchangers are usually shell and tube exchangers,
with the crude oil usually flowing through the tubes and taking up
heat from hot products flowing through the exchanger outside of the
tubes; that is, through the shell side of the exchanger. A
simplified crude-oil heating train is shown on page 38 of R. J.
Hengstebeck's "Petroleum Process," McGraw-Hill, 1959.
Before the crude oil completes the flow through the heat-exchange
train, it is usually subjected to desalting. Desalting is applied
to remove brine from the crude oil. It is accomplished by mixing
water with the crude oil whereby the water unites with the brine.
The aqueous (brine-water) phase is separated from the oil by
settling; in most modern plants removal of water droplets from the
oil is aided by electrical means.
The brine which is separated from the oil contains salts such as
sodium chloride, calcium salts, magnesium salts, etc.
Desalting of crude oil is described in more detail at page 265 of
W. L. Nelson's "Petroleum Refinery Engineering," Fourth Edition,
McGraw-Hill. As shown by data given on page 94 of Nelson's book,
some crude oils are so low in salt content that desalting is not
needed. But this is the exception, rather than the rule, and
desalting nearly always is applied.
Also, before the crude oil completes the heating ahead of the crude
oil distillation column, it is frequently flashed.
The word "flashed" is used to mean the vaporization of part of the
oil mixture by reduction of the pressure on the oil mixture. Thus,
in many crude oil units, after the oil is heated to about
350.degree. to 550.degree.F., it is flashed into a flash drum. The
flash drum removes light components, such as water and low-boiling
hydrocarbons, from the oil so that the flow through the final
heating, the furnace, is reduced. The overhead from the flash drum
is introduced usually as a vapor to the crude-oil distillation
column. The bottoms are heated in the furnace and then fed to the
crude-oil distillation column.
Many crude-oil units have a desalter but no flashing step. In
either case, the desalting step is typically at a temperature of
about 250.degree.F., that is, considerably below a typical flashing
step temperature (assuming a flashing step is employed at all).
Desalting is preferably carried out at the low temperature,
because: (1) the separation of the brine from the oil is usually
more efficient at the lower temperature, particularly if electrical
means are used to aid in the separation; and (2) it is usually felt
desirable from the standpoint of reduced heat-exchange fouling to
reduce the salts before reaching a temperature above 300.degree.F.
Flashing is typically done at a higher temperature, because light
components are removed more effectively by flashing off from the
majority of the crude oil at higher temperatures, compared to lower
temperatures.
Therefore, in the past, heat exchangers have been used after
desalting and before flashing in order to increase the temperature
from the desalting temperature to a more desirable flashing
temperature (or to a higher temperature to prepare the oil for
further heating or introduction to the distillation column).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, in a process which
comprises heating and desalting and then further heating a
hydrocarbonaceous oil using heat exchangers and a desalter, the
improvement is made which comprises flashing the oil to remove
water after desalting the oil and before further heating of the oil
in any heat exchanger.
The present invention is based in part on data which I have
obtained and analyzed showing that flashed oil, particularly
flashed crude oil, exhibits only mild fouling characteristics, such
that relatively low fluid velocities, in the 2- to
10-feet-per-second range can keep the heat transfer surfaces clean.
The surprising result that exchanger fouling can be dramatically
reduced in many instances by flashing after desalting is believed
by me to be at least in part attributable to the form the trace
amount of salts achieves after desalting, if the oil is
flashed.
In desalting, as in other processing, 100% efficiency is, of
course, not achieved. Thus, there are at least small amounts of
brine left in the oil after the desalting step. It is theorized
that upon flashing the oil from the desalting step, remaining water
-- that is, a substantial portion, such as 75% or more, of the
remaining free water -- is flashed from the crude oil, and salts
precipitate out as rather sizable aggregates, similar to dirt
particles. If the water is left in the oil, the salt also stays
dissolved in the oil by means of the water which is carried with
the oil. It is theorized that the salt left in the oil in this form
tends to act as a "cementing" means to result in very tenacious
deposits to heat-exchanger surfaces, such as the inside of
heat-exchanger tube walls. On the other hand, it is theorized that
in the process of the present invention, when the water is
substantially flashed out of the oil the salts precipitate out as
aggregates, which aggregates in turn do not deposit extremely
tenaciously upon the heat-exchange surfaces or cause extremely
tenacious deposits on heat-exchange surfaces.
Thus, it is seen that the present invention is considerably
different from prior art methods of attack, which in many instances
were directed to efficient desalting per se, so as to remove the
salt constituents from oil and thereby improve downstream
operations. In fact, the data which I have obtained and analyzed
show that in some instances extremely efficient desalting per se
can increaase heat-exchanger fouling rather than decrease
heat-exchanger fouling. It is theorized that the increased fouling
resulting from more efficient desalting per se is caused by the
fact that the desalting substantially dehydrates the oil in its
efficient separation of the aqueous phase from the oil phase, with
the result that little aqueous phase is left to maintain the
remaining trace amounts of salts in solution. Thus, those tract
amounts of salts left in the oil deposit tenaciously or cause
tenacious deposits on the walls of the exchanger tubes as the
temperature of the crude oil is increased when flowing through the
downstream exchangers.
Connected with this, it should be pointed out that a number of
salts exhibit inverse solubility as, for example, calcium sulfate,
which is progressively less soluble at higher temperatures, so that
as temperatures are increased it tends toward depositing out from
solution in trace amounts of water in the oil. In addition, as the
temperature is raised, water tends to dissolve in oil and/or
vaporize so that less liquid-phase water is left to hold salts in
solution.
Also, the process of the present invention can be contrasted to
those prior art processes which suggest simple addition of an
additive for reducing heat-exchanger fouling. For example, U.S.
Pat. No. 3,390,073, entitled "Hydrocarbon Additive for Heat
Exchanger Anti-Fouling," is directed to the addition of an
anti-foulant additive at points such as downstream of a crude-oil
desalter but ahead of crude oil preheat exchangers.
In the process of the present invention the crude oil desalting
step is followed by a flashing step before passing the crude oil
through any heat exchanger. The flash temperature should be
selected at about the lowest temperature where crude oil can be
flashed without foam problems. Foaming tends to be reduced if the
crude oil is at a low viscosity. Thus, this is one of the factors
which has caused the flashing step in the past to be carried out at
relatively high temperatures compared to the desalting step, as
viscosity is lower at higher temperatures. However, in the process
of the present invention it is desired to operate at about the
lowest temperature for the flash without going into the
substantial-foaming-temperature regime. In the present invention,
relatively low temperatures are desired for the flashing step
because the flashing step immediately follows the desalting step,
and it is generally desirable to carry out desalting at a low
temperature, compared to the final temperature of the crude oil
before the crude oil is fed to the crude-oil distillation
column.
However, in the process of the present invention the flash
temperature should be sufficiently high so that the vapor pressure
of steam is sufficiently high to result in at least 75% of the free
water flashing off or vaporizing from the crude oil in the flash
drum. Alternatively, this may be phrased in terms of pressure in
the flashing step or flash drum; the pressure in the flash drum
preferably is below the vapor pressure of free water at the
temperature in the flash drum. "Free water" refers to that water
over and above the water which is soluble in the oil as a true
solution.
Preferred flashing temperatures are usually between about
250.degree.-350.degree.F., contrasted to more typical flash-drum
temperatures between about 350.degree.-550.degree.F. The flash-drum
temperature or flashing temperature can be taken, for sake of
specificness, as the temperature of the crude oil liquid remaining
after the flash, i.e., the crude oil liquid in the bottom part of
the flash drum as opposed to the vapor in the upper part.
Together with the usual preferred temperature of about
250.degree.-350.degree.F. for the flashing step, in accordance with
the present invention preferred pressures are usually between about
10-120 psig.
Preferred oil feeds for the process of the present invention are
whole crude petroleum oils. Arabian light petroleum is a
particularly preferred feedstock for the process of the present
invention, because the Arabian light petroleum has a relatively low
viscosity compared to other whole crudes, and therefore can be
flashed at a relatively low temperature without substantial foaming
problems. The viscosity of Arabian light petroleum is about 1.0 cp
at 280.degree.F. The gravity of Arabian light petroleum is about
34.5.degree.API.
Other whole crudes having a relatively low specific gravity, for
example a gravity between about 33.degree.API and 36.degree.API,
are also preferred whole crude feedstocks for the process of the
present invention.
In the process of the present invention, as applied to the Arabian
light petroleum, it is preferred to flash the Arabian light
petroleum at a temperature between about 260.degree.-320.degree.F.,
for example about 280.degree.F. Carrying out the flashing step of
the process of the present invention, as applied to relatively
light whole crude petroleum oils having a gravity between about
33.degree.API and 36.degree.API, at the relatively low flashing
temperature of 260.degree.-320.degree.F. is a particularly
preferred embodiment of the present invention.
According to a specific embodiment of the present invention, a
process is provided for reducing the fouling of crude-oil
distillation unit preheat exchangers downstream of a desalting
step, which process comprises: (a) heating feed crude oil to a
temperature between 150.degree.-450.degree.F. by passing the oil
through heat exchanger tubes at a pressure between 20 and 500 psig
and transferring heat from a hot fluid across the tube walls to
said oil; (b) removing salts from the oil in a desalter by
contacting the oil with water and then separating the oil from the
water at a pressure between 20 and 500 psig and a temperature
between 150.degree.-450.degree.F.; (c) flashing off remaining water
from the oil, before further heating in any heat exchangers, by
reducing the pressure below the vapor pressure of free water at the
temperature of the flashing step; and (d) then further heating the
oil to a temperature above the flashing temperature and between
about 350.degree.-900.degree.F. by passing the oil through
heat-exchange tubes and transferring heat from a hot fluid across
the heat-exchange-tube walls to the oil.
When using the process of the present invention with some crude oil
feedstocks, particularly heavy, viscous feedstocks having a gravity
above about 36.degree.API, it is desirable to obtain some heating
between the desalting and flashing steps, but without the use of
heat exchangers, as omission of the use of shell and tube heat
exchangers between the desalting and flashing steps is critical to
the process of the present invention. One manner of obtaining
further heating between the desalting and flashing steps is by
injecting a hot oil, for example a recycle oil, from downstream of
the post-flash-drum heat exchangers and/or furnace. This manner of
directly heating the crude oil is described further in my
co-inventorship application with John H. Arndt, entitled "Crude Oil
Processing," filed on or about Jan. 26, 1973, Ser. No. 326,616, now
U.S. Pat. No. 3,798,152.
For crude oil feedstocks with a gravity below 36.degree.API, it is
usually preferable in the process of the present invention to omit
any heating, direct or by heat exchange, between the desalting and
flashing steps. But for relatively viscous crude oil feedstocks
with a gravity above 36.degree.API, it is usually preferred to
directly heat the crude oil by hot oil injection or by steam
injection or the like between the desalting and flashing steps.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The drawing is a schematic process flow diagram illustrating a
preferred embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Referring now more particularly to the drawing, crude oil is
introduced to the process via line 1 and pumped in liquid form to a
pressure of about 100 to 500 psig using pump 25. The oil is then
heated by heat exchanger 2 from a temperature of about 70.degree.F.
to about 250.degree.F. Usually exchanger 2 will not be simply one
exchanger, but will be two or more heat exchangers.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention,
as referred to under "Summary of the Invention," water is
introduced via line 26 to aid in the reduction of fouling in
exchanger 2.
The heating fluid from which heat is transferred to the crude oil
flowing through heat exchanger 2 usually passes through the shell
side of exchanger 2 as indicated by line 3, and then line 4. This
heating fluid can be one or more of streams 20-24 withdrawn from
crude oil distillation column 19.
The crude oil, at a temperature of about 300.degree.F., is passed
via line 5 from exchanger 2 to desalter 6. Additional water can be
added to the crude oil immediately ahead of the desalter as
indicated by line 27. Typically, the amount of water in the crude
oil introduced to the desalter is a total of about 5 pounds per 100
pounds of oil.
The desalter is used to remove the brine from the crude oil in
accordance with well-known desalting techniques. The separation of
the aqueous brine phase from the oil phase is frequently aided by
electrical means, so that a substantially water-free oil is
obtained after the desalting step.
In prior art processes the substantially water-free oil,
particularly as obtained after highly efficient electrical
desalting, frequently causes severe exchanger heat transfer surface
fouling downstream of the desalter. However, in the process of the
present invention, the oil withdrawn from the desalter is not
passed immediately through a heat exchanger; instead, a flashing
step follows the desalting step. Then further heating of the oil in
heat exchangers and/or a tubular furnace is carried out, with
usually a reduced fouling rate and/or fouling of a less severe
nature that can be kept at a tolerable level for long periods (a
quarter-year and more), by velocities such as 2- to
10-feet-per-second for crude oil through heat exchanger tubes.
Referring again more particularly to the drawing, separated water
is withdrawn from the desalter as indicated by line 30. Oil is
withdrawn in line 7 and is flashed across pressure-drop valve 8
into flash drum 10 via line 9.
Vapor is withdrawn from flash drum 10 via line 11 and is then
introduced to the crude oil distillation column.
The majority of the crude oil remains in liquid phase and is
withdrawn via line 12 for further heating in heat exchanger 13. The
heating of the oil in exchanger 13 is typically accomplished by
exchange with one or more of streams 21-24 from the crude oil
distillation column. A hot product stream such as stream 24 is
passed through the heat exchanger, as indicated by lines 14 and
15.
The crude oil is thus heated in exchanger 13 (or in several
exchangers which may be grouped under the designation 13) from the
flash-drum temperature of about 300.degree.F. to a temperature of
about 450.degree.F. The crude oil is then heated further to a
temperature of about 600.degree.-800.degree.F. in furnace 17 before
introduction to the crude oil distillation column via line 18.
EXAMPLE
Data were obtained from one operation (designated as "PN"). The
crude oil heating train in the PN operation consisted of a first
heat exchange, desalting, further heat exchange (second heat
exchange), flashing, still further heat exchange (third heat
exchange), furnace heating, and then introduction to a crude oil
distillation column. The water used for desalting in this operation
was zeolite-softened water. The connate water in the crude oil was
basically sea water, having large amounts of sodium chloride and
only relatively small amounts of calcium salts. In this operation
the data which were obtained and analyzed showed severe fouling for
the second heat exchange, that is, fouling in the heat exchanger
between the desalting and the flashing steps. The deposits were
very tenacious and could be successfully cleaned from the
heat-exchange surface (i.e., in this instance, inside of the
exchanger tubes) only by vigorous means such as reaming out the
deposits from the exchanger tubes.
The main salt component carried over by the entrained water from
the desalter in the subject operation was, of course, expected to
be sodium chloride. Metals analysis of the desalted crude oil
confirmed that the sodium content (1 ppm) was greater than the
calcium content (0.4 ppm). Analysis of the unwashed fouling
deposit, however, showed that the calcium content was two orders of
magnitude higher than the sodium content, and that the main
constituent was CaSO.sub.4 -- an inverse solubility salt. The
principal salt components in the fouling deposit were: Na 0.12
weight percent Ca 16.8 do. Cl 0.08 do. SO.sub.4 45.2 do.
The presence of iron sulfate and iron sulfide was also noted.
The above salt analysis supports other data which I have analyzed
indicating that substantial fouling occurs after the desalting step
when the crude oil is heated prior to being subjected to a flashing
step. It is theorized that the fouling is caused or connected to
precipitation of inverse-solubility salts from continuing liquid
water droplets; that is, entrained fine water droplets or the like
remaining in trace amounts after the desalting step. As stated
before, the inverse-solubility salts, such as calcium, have
decreased solubility in water as temperature is increased.
Contrasted to the severe fouling in the second heat exexchange, the
fouling in the third heat exchange, that is, the heat exchange
after flashing, was very low, specifically, lower by a factor of at
least 10. Of course, the salts which were present in the oil
leaving the second heat exchange are still present in the oil after
the flashing step, as the salts are not volatile. However, it is
believed, in view of the data which have been analyzed, that the
salts are in a much less harmful form after the flashing, perhaps
because of the removal of remaining water and resultant
precipitation of the salts in the flashing step as aggregates such
as dirt particles. It should be mentioned that the term "removal of
the remaining water" by flashing does not mean that all of the
remaining water is removed as, of course, the water sets up an
equilibrium with the oil and, also, even equilibrium is not reached
100% completely, and there are some inefficiencies in vapor liquid
separation.
In another operation (designated as "PG"), crude oil was passed
through a series of exchangers, desalted, and then passed through
more exchangers and a furnace before introduction to a crude oil
distillation column. No flashing step was used. When the desalter
was operating relatively inefficiently, such that about 0.5 to 1.0
weight percent of water remained in the oil from the desalter,
heat-exchanger fouling after the desalter was lower than when the
desalter was operating more efficiently with better electrical
means, so as to reduce the water to about 0.2 weight percent.
Furthermore, the addition of more water when the desalter was
operating efficiently resulted in the substantial reduction of
exchanger-tube fouling rate. Thus, the addition of water to aid in
the reduction of fouling was shown by the operation designated as
PG.
* * * * *