U.S. patent number 3,887,324 [Application Number 05/406,210] was granted by the patent office on 1975-06-03 for method for non-polluting combustion of waste gases.
This patent grant is currently assigned to John Zink Company. Invention is credited to John C. Corble, Horst Glomm, Harold F. Koons, Robert D. Reed, Robert F. Schwartz, John Smith Zink.
United States Patent |
3,887,324 |
Reed , et al. |
June 3, 1975 |
Method for non-polluting combustion of waste gases
Abstract
A non-polluting waste-gas disposal system for processing plants
or other operation subject to variable quantities of waste gas for
disposal. The system includes a low-level burner normally adapted
to handle the usual volumes of plant waste gas, required to be
disposed, without visible flame, smoke or noise pollution. An
elevated flare can be used in combination to consume gases in
excess of the normal capacity of the low-level flare. This is a
division of application Ser. No. 216,659, filed Jan. 10, 1972, and
now U.S. Pat. No. 3,779,689.
Inventors: |
Reed; Robert D. (Tulsa, OK),
Zink; John Smith (Tulsa, OK), Schwartz; Robert F.
(Tulsa, OK), Glomm; Horst (Frankfort, DT), Corble;
John C. (St. Albans, EN), Koons; Harold F.
(Tulsa, OK) |
Assignee: |
John Zink Company (Tulsa,
OK)
|
Family
ID: |
26911223 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/406,210 |
Filed: |
October 15, 1973 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
216659 |
Jan 10, 1972 |
3779689 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
431/5; 431/3;
431/29; 431/121; 431/202; 431/4; 431/90; 431/190 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F23N
1/025 (20130101); F23G 7/08 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F23G
7/08 (20060101); F23N 1/02 (20060101); F23G
7/06 (20060101); F23d 013/20 () |
Field of
Search: |
;431/3,4,5,29,30,32,60,89,90,121,202,281,190 ;137/118 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Myhre; Charles J.
Assistant Examiner: Anderson; William C.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of burning variable quantities of waste gas comprising
the steps of:
flowing a purge gas through a conduit to a first gas-air mixing and
burner stage immediately prior to the flowing of said waste gas
through said conduit;
flowing said waste gas through said conduit to said first burner
stage;
igniting said waste gas-air mixture; and the additional steps
of:
sensing a pressure or flow condition of said waste gas;
flowing a purge gas through a second gas-air mixing and burner
stage responsive to an increase of said pressure or flow;
flowing said waste gas to said first and said second burner stages
responsive to further increase in flow and pressure; and
igniting said waste gas-air mixture.
2. A method of burning variable quantities of waste gas comprising
the steps of:
feeding a purge gas and said waste gas to a first gas-air mixing
and burner stage; and
igniting said waste gas issuing therefrom;
sensing a pressure or flow condition of said waste gas;
flowing a purge gas through a second gas-air mixing and burner
stage responsive to a first condition of said pressure or flow;
flowing said waste gas to said second burner stage responsive to a
second condition of pressure or flow higher than said first
condition; and
igniting said waste gas-air mixture.
3. A method of claim 2 including the additional steps of:
flowing a purge gas through a third gas-air mixing and burner stage
responsive to a third condition of said pressure or flow higher
than said second condition;
flowing said waste gas to said first, second and third burner
stages responsive to a fourth condition of said pressure or flow
higher than said third; and
igniting said waste gas-air mixture.
4. A method of claim 2 including the additional steps of:
flowing a purge gas through a plurality of additional gas-air
mixing and burner stages responsive to a third condition of said
pressure or flow higher than said second condition;
flowing said waste gas to said first, second and additional burner
stages responsive to a fourth condition of said pressure or flow
higher than said third; and
igniting said waste gas.
5. A method of claim 3 including the additional step of:
sequencing said steam and waste gas to additional burner stages as
a function of increases in said waste gas pressure or flow.
6. A method of burning variable quantities of waste gas comprising
the steps of:
sensing a pressure or flow condition of said waste gas;
flowing said gas to a first ignitable burner stage responsive to a
first condition of said pressure or flow; and
flowing said gas to said first and a second ignitable burner stage
responsive to a second condition of said pressure or flow higher
than said first condition.
Description
BACKGROUND
In many crowded areas of the world it is necessary, because of
existing plant operation, to dispose of waste gases by burning or
oxidizing, since the waste gases normally have no other utilitarian
purpose. In order to maintain a plant in its existing community
location, it is becoming increasingly necessary to provide such
disposal without pollution of the atmosphere and without visible
flame and noise and hence provide an acceptable disposal system to
the surrounding community.
In addition, many plants, such as refineries, chemical processes
and the like, form, at various stages of operation, variable
quantities of gases which must be disposed. For example, in many
processing operations the start-up or shut-down procedures
typically will involve changes in the normal quantity of disposable
gas until the efficient operation of the plant is reached. For one
reason or another, many processes may be upset or overloaded, hence
taxing the normal disposal system beyond its efficient operation.
In the fuel burning art stable burning and complete combustion for
safe operation can be expected when fuel flow ranges from 2 to 100
percent of design condition. When fuel flow falls below 2 percent
of design flow there is great difficulty in securing safe and
stable burning in a combustion space which is at high temperature
level. At a temperature level of 150.degree. F. or lower, safe,
stable and complete burning in any typical burner or combustion
system is difficult and virtually impossible. Because of the many
operational variables found in many process plants it is vitally
necessary that there be safe, stable and complete burning of any
small or large waste gas volume in addition to stringent
air-pollution regulations and safety. Because of widely varying
quantities, the safe and efficient disposal is burdened. Some prior
artisans have devised plural burner stages which operate
sequentially upon reaching a given pressure but have the
disadvantage of each stage starting at zero flow and these systems
do not operate efficiently and economically.
SUMMARY
It is the purpose and object of this invention to overcome the
heretofore mentioned problems and provide a flare or disposal
system for waste gas utilizing a low-level ground burning system
which is substantially smokeless, noiseless, and non-polluting to
the atmosphere. Such a low-level burner is designed to accept those
quantities of gas for disposal under normal or non-normal operating
conditions of the plant, and in some instances, may be used alone
or in combination with an elevated flare apparatus for consumption
of excess quantities of gas beyond the rated capacities of the
low-level burner.
The invention further provides and is directed to a flare stack
which comprises one or a plurality of substantially low-level
burner areas to receive and provide efficient combustion of
variable quantities of waste gas, and an upper stack for the
venting of the products of combustion. The inner diameter of the
upper stack being substantially unrestrictive to the flow of the
products of combustion, or in any event of design to create a
maximum flow velocity immediately at the point of discharge.
To abate the noise of combustion flame, the invention further
provides a screen either opposite each burner area, or completely
encircling the lower level burner areas as a plenum chamber to
abate the noise of combustion, visual display of the flame, and to
present air pressure differentials caused by wind forces.
The invention further provides a waste gas flow staging method
whereby a predetermined minimum pressure can be experienced by
burner stages, subsequent to the first, without starting at zero
flow. As additional flow of waste gas is experienced a condition
sensing means allows flow to a subsequent stage to be combined with
the previous stage or stages at a predetermined pressure and flow
above zero.
The above purposes, objects and other objects of the invention may
be more readily obtained and understood by reference to the
following drawings and descriptive matter.
DRAWINGS
DESCRIPTION OF THE VIEWS
FIG. 1 is an elevational view, partly in section, depicting a
typical low-level burner of this invention.
FIG. 2 is a front view of a typical burner nozzle taken along the
line 2--2 of FIG. 1.
FIG. 2A is a partial sectional view of the burner nozzle taken
along the line 2A--2A of FIG. 2.
FIG. 3 is a partial sectional view of an additional embodiment.
FIG. 4 is a partial elevation of another embodiment.
FIG. 4A is a partial top sectional view of a burner opening
utilizing the screen embodiment of FIG. 4.
FIGS. 5 and 6 are schematic descriptions generally depicting the
gas disposal system of this invention.
FIG. 7 represents a schematic diagram of the flow staging for
disposal of variable quantities of waste gases.
DESCRIPTION
Before explaining the present invention in details, it is to be
understood that this invention is not limited in its application to
the details of construction and arrangement of parts illustrated in
the accompanying drawings, since the invention is capable of other
embodiments and of being practiced or carried out in various ways.
Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology
employed herein is for the purpose of description and not
limitation.
GROUND LEVEL FLARE STACK
The embodiment shown in FIG. 1 includes a burner or flare stack 10
preferably of cylindrical shape fully opening at its upper end 12.
The stack 10 may be fabricated to any desired height such that the
effluent exhaust gases are at an acceptable elevation above the
surrounding terrain or community. Typically such a stack is about
18 feet in diameter and may range from 40 to 100 feet or more in
height, which in the burner art is of a relatively low-level.
Although the stack may be fabricated in a variety of ways
typically, as shown, construction comprises an outer metallic shell
14 which is lined with a suitable refractory material 16. Although
the flare stack 10 is described as being circular it is to be
understood that this is not to be limiting as other cross-sectional
configuration, e.g., round, square, rectangular or other
geometrical configurations are to be inclusive of the invention. In
any event in the preferred form of the apparatus the inner
configuration of the stack is preferably the same throughout the
vertical length than in any event not less than the internal
cross-sectional area at the location of the burners 20. The
purposes for the maintaining of a substantially constant
cross-sectional area throughout the length of the stack is based on
the so-called `natural-draft` or `chimney-effect.` That is, a
structure as described generates a draft as the buoyant gases rise.
Such an effect is useful in producing sufficient in-flow draft of
combustion supporting air through openings 18 for burning the
gases. Such a draft effect is a function of both the height of the
stack and the temperature of the gases. Since the internal
temperature level is usually fixed, the stack height becomes
critical in the establishment of sufficient draft of incoming air
to support smokeless combustion of the waste gas stream. Any
reduction in cross-sectional area in the vertical travel of the
gases will produce an acceleration at the restriction but subtract
from the draft-induced air because of the created pressure drop
across the restriction. This may seriously reduce the air volume
and the efficiency of the combustion process. However, additional
factors enter into the design of the stack based largely upon
present ecological requirements of government or other regulatory
agencies. In addition, there are regulatory height restrictions and
cost restrictions which must be considered. For example, it has
been found that certain exit velocities from a stack must be
maintained in order to have proper diffusion of pollutant products
into the surrounding atmosphere to maintain a required
parts-per-million (ppm) condition.
A further factor is the makeup of the combustible waste gases and
its burning temperature. For combustible gases there is
chemically-fixed theoretical air demand according to the nature of
the gases. Flame temperature, which may exist within the stack, is
governed by the quantity of air in excess of the theoretical
present as the burning progresses. For example, ethylene (C.sub.2
H.sub.4) utilizing theoretical air demand of 14.4 cubic feet/Cu.ft.
of ethylene results in a temperature excess of 3,600.degree. F.
which far exceeds typical refractory endurance. A much more
satisfactory temperature level is 2,000.degree. F. which can be
obtained by the admission of more than theoretical air for the
burning. Two hundred fifty percent excess air or 50.5 Cu.ft/cubic
ft. of ethylene will result in temperature within which standard
refractories can be utilized. The exit velocity of a typical stack
based on 2,000.degree. F. is in the order of 75 feet per second. In
many instances this velocity is sufficient to diffuse pollutant
products, such as SO.sub.2, into the atmosphere within required
parts/million. However, if the velocity of discharge required for
proper diffusion is greater than 75 feet per second and where the
volume of waste or disposal gases is fixed the required velocity
increase must occur by other means where structures of minimal
height are necessitated by regulation, cost, or other factors.
Reducing the discharge cross-sectional area as in FIG. 3 is one
such means. For example, if the velocity of a given quantity of
combustion gas flow at the required temperature is 75 ft./second
and 100 ft./second is required for proper diffusion of pollutants,
there must be a 25 ft./second acceleration. The height of a
vertical furnace with substantially constant cross-sectional area
vertically for burning 30,000 lbs/hour C.sub.2 H.sub.4 is 62.68
feet which provides a flow velocity of 75 ft./second. The height
necessary to achieve a discharge velocity of 100 ft./second
considering total pressure drop due to acceleration (0.53 inch
Water Column) plus the pressure drop (0.35 inch WC) across the
burners (0.88 inch WC total) divided by a net draft effect per foot
of stack height (0.00905 inch WC) calls for a stack 97.24 feet
high. If a flow restriction is placed within the stack, the
pressure drop to be added is approximately:
(.sqroot.0.3 .times. 100/75).sup.2 - 0.3 = 0.233 inch of water
(WC)
At 2,000.degree. F. the draft effect per foot of stack height is
0.0115 inch WC. Since the draft increase required is 0.233 inch WC
the additional stack height necessary to provide for the added
draft is:
0.233/.00905 = 25.41 feet
The total height required being:
62.68 feet + 25.41 feet = 88.09 feet
This data, however, is based on flow efficiency at the restricted
area of 100 percent which in most instances is not the case. For
example, a thin edged orifice such as used in metering is
approximately 61 percent efficient. When the ratio of the orifice
length to diameter is 1.00 a coefficient becomes 0.85, but the
point at which the preferred velocity occurs is down inside the
orifice and is not effective as such in promoting diffusion.
Accordingly, this invention teaches that maximum velocity discharge
must occur immediately as the gases flow to the atmosphere for
effective pollution control. This invention teaches a stack orifice
contour which will provide exit flow coefficients ranging close to
1.00 which will provide a relatively low-stack height, proper
diffusion of pollutants into the atmosphere and maximum velocity of
diffusion yet providing cost savings. A typical example of such a
stack discharge orifice cross-section is shown in FIG. 3.
Preferably the restriction is positioned within the upper 10-15
percent of the stack height and comprises a converging wall 17
terminating with an arcuate contoured portion 19, being defined
from a radius (R) centered anywhere along the terminal stack end
21.
BURNERS
Reference is made to FIGS. 1, 2 and 2A. Suitably arranged at one or
a plurality of peripheral locations are burner areas defined by
vertical openings 18 which are adapted to receive a plurality of
vertically arranged burners 20, as shown. In one preferred
embodiment the burner tip is angularly oriented slightly upwardly
and inwardly, e.g., 20.degree. radially into the interior of the
stack 10. It is to be understood that other burner arrangements
which will provide efficient mixing of the waste gas and air are
inclusive of the invention. Although vertically arranged burner
areas 18 are shown, the invention is adaptable to a horizontally
arranged opening or plurality of horizontally oriented openings in
the lower portion of the stack. Combustible waste gas is supplied
from supply connection 23 to each burner nozzle 20 via a manifold
22 being divided to each burner nozzle via conduits 24. The
manifold 22 may be appropriately supported by cross brace numbers
26 and 28 to the stack side wall. Each of the burner nozzle designs
as shown in this preferred embodiment include a diversion plate 30,
surrounding the burner nozzle conduit 24 and which is provided with
a plurality of circular or other shaped openings 32. The nozzle tip
shown includes a central discharge orifice 25 and a plurality of
angularly oriented openings 27. The latter openings are directed
toward the upstream face of plate 30 to cause intimate mixing of
the waste gas with the combusting supporting air draft flowing to
and through plate 30 and perforations 32. It has been found that a
burner nozzle design as shown is adaptable to provide acceptable
time, temperature and turbulence to burn a wide variety of waste
gas components of varying molecular weight without adjustments,
without the formation of coke, carbon or other polymerized chemical
deposits and with substantially complete combustion to eliminate
atmospheric pollutants.
VISUAL, NOISE AND WIND SCREEN
Circumferentially surrounding the bottom of stack 10 is a screen
generally designated by the numeral 36. In this embodiment the
screen includes a plurality of slightly overlapping panel members
38 and 40 which are alternately spaced vertically and horizontally
of each other providing a gap for flow of combustion supporting air
to the burners. In some instances a roof 42 is provided to prevent
weather elements, snow, rain, etc., from interfering with the
efficient operation of the burner and to define an air plenum
surrounding the burner areas. The screen functions to (1) eliminate
the sight of a visible flame; (2) reduce combustion noise; and (3)
substantially eliminate air pressure differentials in the air
plenum about the burner areas from the effect of wind.
Although in the above described embodiment a complete
circumferential wind and noise screen or fence is shown it is to be
understood that such a screen or fence may be segmented about each
burner assembly, shown generally as 36A in the views of FIGS. 4 and
4A. That is, vertical wind and noise screen louvers 50 and 52
extend upward from the ground opposite each burner area and are
supported to the stack outer shell 14 by brace members 54. In some
instances it is desirable to inject steam from a supply manifold 60
into conduit 62 for injection into each of the burner gas supply
conduits 24 providing further assistance toward smokeless
combustion of the gases to be disposed.
MODIFICATIONS
Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6 the low-level flare or burner 10 is
shown as used in combination with a high level flare 70. Such an
elevated flare stack is well known in the art including at its
upper end a combustion tip 72, as for example, shown in U.S. Pat.
No. 3,539,285 and which generally includes devices to ensure
ignition in areas where wind velocity may tend to extinguish the
flame. It should be understood that the use of an elevated flare is
but a safety addendum to the low-level stack of this invention,
being useful as an emergency or secondary disposal means in the
event the low-level stack is sought to operate beyond the rated
design capacities. As shown in FIG. 5, waste gases to be disposed
enter through conduit 80 which is in communication with conduits 90
and 82. Conduit 90 terminates below hydrostatic liquid level 92
while conduit 82 terminates below liquid level 86 which is of
lesser level than 92. Hence waste gas initial flow occurs through
80-82 as long as the flow pressure is greater than liquid level 86
pressure but less than liquid level 92 pressure.
When the pressure in 80 rises to a point capable of displacing the
liquid level 92 pressure flow of gases is initiated in 84-90 to be
discharged to atmosphere through 70 to 72-73 but this initiation of
flow performs a useful service because of the `Flow-Sensor` 84
which at the initiation of flow creates a signal to the steam valve
94 to cause opening of the steam valve in a substantially linear
relationship to the volume of flow of gases from 80 through 90. The
flow sensor 84 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,570,535 and creates
a variable instrument signal, the magnitude of which is
proportional to flow quantity, for transmission to 94.
Steam admitted by the valve 94 travels to the vicinity of 73 where
the steam serves to suppress smoking as is well known in the
arts.
Under normal operating conditions of flow the low-level stack 10 is
maintained in constant operation to its design capacities with the
auxiliary high level flare operating in the event of an upset in
the plant operation involving larger quantities of gas which must
be disposed or in which other intermediaries or products will be
required to be removed to prevent explosions or other hazards.
FIG. 6 is another alternate embodiment of the integrated flare
system with like parts having like numerals from FIG. 5. The
primary difference is the elimination of the second liquid seal
with waste gases passing directly through a flame or explosion
arresting device 87 of a type well known to those skilled in the
art, thence via conduit 21 to the particular burner area or areas.
Excess gas flow through conduit 83 sufficient to overcome
hydrostatic level 85 is then burned in the stack 70.
WASTE GAS STAGING
FIG. 7 is incorporated as a part of this invention disclosure as a
schematic diagram to depict the staging sequence for the burning of
variable quantities of waste gas. The stack 10 depicts the
circumferentially spaced burner areas designated by the numerals
1-6 and are staged in the operation as required for the particular
quantity of waste gas to be disposed. Before successive burners are
staged in the operation, however, there must be a pre-purging of
the burners with a gas of some nature typically steam via conduits
60 and 62 to each burner area. The sequence in operation for the
introduction of a gas stream and the steam are accomplished by
pressure switches which are capable of emitting signals of
controllable magnitude which in turn operate the sequencing valves
as hereafter described. The pressure switches are shown in FIG. 7
as numbered squares (1L--1H, 2L--2H, 3L--3H, etc.). The "L" after
each number indicates a switch which emits its signal on a given
smaller pressure rise of the waste gas while "H" indicates switches
which emit signal on a rise greater in pressure than the L-switch.
The same is true for the operation of the steam control valves
sequentially identified as "steam-7," 9, 11, 13 and 15 which are
used in conjunction with those valves identified as "gas-8," 10,
12, 14 and 16 respectively. In the embodiment shown the odd
numbered steam valves are set to respond to the smallest emitted
signal while the even numbered gas valves respond only to the
greatest emitted signal. Staging of the gas is accomplished in the
following manner. Burner 1 is constantly in operation. It receives
gas via conduit 21 which may be isolated by appropriate valves
shown if required for any reason. Pressure switches 1L and 1H are
in communication with conduit 21 sensing the gas pressure therein.
Controllable amounts of steam via lines 60 and 62 maintain a
constant injection or purge of burner 1 in the event there is no
waste gas stream entering the conduit 21. When a small volume of
gas is delivered to burner 1 the pressure in the conduit 21 is not
capable of energizing pressure switch 1L. As the volume of gas
increases the conduit pressure rises to a point where switch 1L is
energized, emitting a small signal adequate for opening steam-7
valve for admission of purge via conduit 60 and 62-7 into burners
located in area 2. This pressure, however, is not adequate for the
opening of gas-8 valve until a further rise in conduit 21 pressure
causes switch 1H to emit a greater signal thus opening gas-8 valve
and burner 2 is now placed into service, there being, of course,
ignition means of those types well known in the art to ignite and
maintain ignition of the flame. Further increases in pressure then
bring into operation pressure switches 2L and 2H to sequentially
operate purge steam-9 valve and gas-10 valve to cause burner 3 to
be placed into operation with the operation continuing to the other
burners as the increase in waste gas flow and pressure increases.
Of course as the waste gas flow decreases the sequencing procedure
is reversed.
While the purpose of the purge is to prevent burner malfunction or
impairment, any gas may be used for this purpose. Steam is
preferred because of the favorable condition of smoke suppression,
after purging, as it enters a part of the reaction during the
burning process.
* * * * *