U.S. patent number 3,881,475 [Application Number 05/227,465] was granted by the patent office on 1975-05-06 for intra-uterine contraceptive device.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Schmid Laboratories, Inc.. Invention is credited to Harry W. Gordon, Gunther Storz.
United States Patent |
3,881,475 |
Gordon , et al. |
May 6, 1975 |
Intra-uterine contraceptive device
Abstract
An intra-uterine contraceptive device having a pair of loops
extending in opposite directions from a common stem. Each loop has
a free end. The character and thickness of the material forming the
loops and the shape of the loops are such as to permit the loops to
more readily conform to the walls of the uterine cavity of the
patient and thereby be better retained.
Inventors: |
Gordon; Harry W. (Brooklyn,
NY), Storz; Gunther (Brooklyn, NY) |
Assignee: |
Schmid Laboratories, Inc. (New
York, NY)
|
Family
ID: |
22853220 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/227,465 |
Filed: |
February 18, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
128/839 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61F
6/144 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
A61F
6/00 (20060101); A61F 6/14 (20060101); A61f
005/46 () |
Field of
Search: |
;128/130,127,128,129,131 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Gaudet; Richard A.
Assistant Examiner: McGowan; J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Darby & Darby
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An intra-uterine contraceptive device comprising a substantially
straight stem portion from which extends at one end thereof a pair
of oppositely disposed loops which are generally coplanar with the
stem, at least the loops of said device being of a soft plastic
material and having a partially retentive memory to permit the
loops of the device to deform and more readily conform to the walls
of the uterine cavity into which the device is to be inserted, each
loop having a first arch with a respective first radius and
commencing in one direction from one end of the stem and curved to
extend and terminate in a second direction opposite from said first
direction; (a) an elongated straight section commencing at the
termination of said first arch and extending for a distance in said
second direction and generally parallel to the stem, and a second
arch each of a (smaller) respective second radius (than) which is
smaller than the radius of said first arch commencing at the
termination of said elongated straight section extending in said
second direction and then curving back to terminate with a free end
extending toward said first direction; the cross-section of the
loop material having a maximum dimension in one direction in the
range of from about 0.055 to about 0.065 inches and a maximum
dimension in a direction generally transverse to said one direction
in the range of from about 0.045 to about 0.055 inches.
2. A device as in claim 1 wherein the crosssection of each of said
loops is substantially uniform throughout.
3. A device as in claim 1 wherein each of said arches of a said
loop is a substantially semi-circular section.
4. A device as in claim 3 wherein the free end of the second
seme-circular section of one of said loops terminates at a point no
higher than a diameter line of substantially a semi-circle located
between the terminating end of the straight section of the loop and
the free end of said loop.
5. An intra-uterine contraceptive device comprising a substantially
straight stem portion from which extends at one end thereof a pair
of oppositely disposed loops which are generally coplanar with the
stem, at least the loops of said device being of a soft plastic
material and having a partially retentive memory to permit the
loops of the device to deform and more readily conform to the walls
of the uterine cavity into which the device is to be inserted, each
loop having a first generally semi-circular section commencing in
one direction from the stem and curved to extend and terminate in a
second direction opposite from said first direction, (a) an
elongated straight section commencing at the termination of said
first semi-circular section and extending for a distance in said
second direction and generally parallel to the stem, and a second
generally semicircular section of a smaller radius than said first
section commencing at the termination of said straight section
extending in said second direction and then curving back to
terminate with a free end extending toward said first direction;
the free end of the second semi-circular section of one of said
loops terminating at a point no higher than a diameter line of
substantially a semi-circle located between the terminating end of
the straight section of the loop and the free end of said loop with
said diameter line being spaced from all portions of the first
section of the loop, the cross-section of the loop material having
a maximum dimension in one direction in the range of from about
0.055 to about 0.065 inches on a maximum dimension in a direction
generally transverse to said one direction in the range of from
about 0.045 to about 0.055 inches.
6. A device as in claim 5 wherein the cross-section of each of said
loops is substantially uniform throughout.
Description
Intra-uterine contraceptive devices which are inserted into the
uterus of a patient to prevent conception are well-known in the
art. The presence of the device in the uterus, through some
phenomenon not entirely proved, prevents conception.
Modern day intra-uterine devices normally are formed of suitable
biologically inert plastic material having a retentive memory.
These devices rely upon the application of a force, due to the
springiness and/or shape of the device, acting against the walls of
the uterine cavity. The plastic material is made sufficiently thick
and the device is shaped so that the device engages the walls of
the uterus at or near predetermined points of the device. The
material and shape of the device are made such that its active
portions engaging the uterus wall are relatively rigid. The devices
are also sufficiently "stiff", though resilient, such that they
will retain substantially their original shape, before insertion
into the patient, against the forces exerted by the moving walls of
the uterine cavity. That is, if force is applied to the device by
the walls of the uterine cavity at the points of contact with the
device, the device itself will always be exerting a counter force
which will restore it to its original shape.
Intra-uterine devices have suffered, to some extent, from the
problems of discomfort and expulsion from the uterus of the
patient. Expulsion is due to several factors, for example,
anatomical features of the patient which are incompatible with the
material and/or shape of the device, physiological and
psychological incompatibility, etc. The expulsion rate, variable
with different types of devices, still presents a problem for, if
the device is expelled or is not retained in the uterus properly,
it cannot prevent conception in the intended manner.
It is believed that the expulsion and discomfort problem is due in
some measure to the trauma accompanied with the insertion of the
device into the uterine cavity. While this trauma is relatively
minor in nature, it still presents a problem since it is believed
to set in motion those physiological and psychological factors
which cause expulsion. This is particularly true in so-called
nullipara patients (patients who have not previously borne
children). It is known that the tolerance of nullipara patients for
retaining intra-uterine devices is substantially lower than in
patients who have borne children. Therefore, the expulsion rate of
nullipara patients is considerably higher than those of other
patients with the same device.
It has been found that the comfortable seating of the device and
the ability of the device to conform to the uterine cavity reduces
the incidence of cramping, excess bleeding and other discomforts
normally associated with these devices following their insertion.
This is particularly true following the insertion of the presently
available devices for the nullipara patients.
The present invention is directed to an intra-uterine contraceptive
device and improvements therein which reduces the trauma
accompanying the insertion of the device, and raises the
tolerability of acceptance and retention by a patient. This results
in a lower expulsion and higher acceptance rate.
In accordance with the invention, the intra-uterine device is of
the double loop type, for example, that shown in U.S. Pat. No.
3,590,816, issued to Gerald S. Rosenthal, which is assigned to the
assignee of the subject application. This device is currently being
marketed by Julius Schmid, Inc., the assignee of the subject
application, under the trademark SAF-T-COIL. The device of the
subject invention is suitably shaped and made of material having
dimensions such that the device is capable of easily deforming
within the uterus of the patient to more closely conform to the
particular configuration or shape of the patient's uterus. Unlike
prior art intra-uterine devices, the device of the subject
invention does not depend upon a completely retentive memory which
enables it to spring back to its original shape.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an
intra-uterine contraceptive device which can be more easily
inserted into the patient and retained.
A further object is to provide an intra-uterine contraceptive
device which is suitable for use by nullipara patients.
Another object is to provide an intra-uterine contraceptive device
which, though having a partially retentive memory, is still capable
of substantial deformation.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become
more apparent upon reference to the following specification and
annexed drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a plan view of the intra-uterine contraceptive device
according to the subject invention;
FIG. 2 is a view of the intra-uterine contraceptive device and a
portion of the inserter system therefor;
FIG. 3 is a view of a cross-section of the uterus of a patient, in
the frontal plane, showing a device of the subject invention
implanted therein; and
FIG. 4 is another cross-sectional view of the uterus of FIG. 3
taken along the medial plane thereof.
Referring to FIG. 1, the intra-uterine contraceptive device 10 of
the present invention includes a stem 12 which is formed at its
lower end with an enlarged portion 13 having a hole 14. A double
thread 16 has one end passed through hole 14. The thread is tied at
the hole or just passed through and a portion doubled back. The
other end of the double thread 16 is inserted through a hole 18 in
the leading end of a plunger 20. Here again, the thread is tied or
merely passed through and a portion doubled back. Plunger 20 fits
within the leading end of a tubular inserter 22 and the railing end
of the plunger projects from the trailing end of the tubular
inserter 22. The inserter system formed by the combination of
thread 16, rod 20 and the tubular member 22 are more fully
described in the aforesaid patent to Rosenthal, and below.
The upper end of the stem opposite hole 14 has two loops 30a and
30b originating therefrom. Each loop has a free terminal end. With
the exception of the terminal end of loop 30b, the material for the
loop is of uniform shape and cross-section. In the original,
undeformed state of the device, the two loops lie in the same
plane, that is, they are coplanar.
Considering first loop 30a, this is formed by upper and lower
sections 31a and 32a. Sections 31a and 32a are sectors of a
generally circular configuration which are joined by a straight
portion 33a. The two sections 31a and 32a are, essentially,
semi-circular in shape. The mid-point, or center, of the upper
semi-circular section 31a is shown at point A, and the mid-point
for the lower semi-circular section 32a is shown at point B. The
radii originating from points A and B, to the inner or outer edge
of the sections are different with the former being slightly
greater, for example, 0.150 versus 0.200 inches to the outer edge
of the respective section.
The outer arm of loop 31a, which contains straight portion 33a will
normally engage the uterus wall. Having a straight-side wall 33a,
it will engage the uterus wall over a greater area of contact than
would be possible if the loop 33a were a continuous curve or series
of curves. Also, as explained below, the loops 30a and 30b are
highly deformable and conformable to the shape of the uterine
cavity walls and their movement.
It should be noted that, with respect to the lower section 32a of
the loop 30a, its free end terminates on the diameter line of the
lower loop section 32a extending through point B. That is, the
lower section 32a having the radius originating at point B is only
a semi-circle and does not comprise an arc of more than
180.degree.. This permits a relatively high degree of flexibility
and deformability of the bottom portion 32a.
If the free end of lower section 32a were continued for more than
180.degree., beyond the diameter line, or to start to form a
spiral, the free end would have a greater tendency to spring the
loop 30a back into its original, undeformed shape when force is
applied to the device.
Considering now the other loop 30b, the upper section 31b is of the
same configuration as section 31a of loop 30a, and has the same
radius and mid-point A. The lower loop section 32b has a first
radius, the same as the lower section 32a of the loop 30b,
originating from point B forming an approximately 90.degree. sector
of a circle and a second somewhat smaller radius originating from
point C. The upper and lower sections 31b and 32b are joined
together by the straight side wall piece 33b.
Instead of terminating in a free end of the same diameter as the
other portion of the loop 31b, as in the case of loop 30a, loop 31b
terminates the sector formed by radius C in a head 36 extending
from a shank portion 38. Head 36 is of substantially increased
diameter as compared to the remainder of loop 31b and terminates in
a larger bulbous end 39. The bulbous end 39 of head 36 prevents the
device from being drawn into the tubular inserter 22 when the
device is placed in a position in the inserter tube such as to be
inserted in the patient.
Considering now the material and dimensions of the device of FIG.
1, the material is primarily an ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA)
copolymer. Materials of this type are flexible and rubber-like in
character. They are also resilient and have "snap-back" action, or
a retentive memory. The material can be molded, such as by
injection molding, to form the device. The plastic molding resin
used in the molding preferably has a radio opaque material, such as
barium sulphate mixed therein. Preferably, up to about (Ten) 10
percent of the radio opaque material is used. If desired,
processing aids or lubricants can be mixed with the material.
In accordance with the present invention, the crosssection of the
portion of the device forming the two loops 31a and 31b, with the
exception of the bulbous end 39 of head 36 on loop 31b, is made
relatively thin. For example, it has a cross-section of
approximately 0.050 inches in the plane shown, that is, between
points X and Y of FIG. 1, and a dimension of about 0.060 in a plane
transverse thereto. The use of such a relatively thin
cross-section, while in part detracting from the retentive memory
characteristic of the intra-uterine device as compared to a device
of the same general shape having a thicker cross-section material,
is deliberately selected since it permits the high degree of
flexibility of the loops 30a and 30b and their better conformity to
the walls of the uterus. It should be understood that the two
dimensions for the cross-section given above can vary within a
range, for example, between about 0.045 and 0.055 inches for the
first dimension given, and between about 0.055 and 0.065 inches for
the second dimension given. A more circular or fully circular
cross-section also can be used.
The device shown in FIG. 1 is in overall shape similar to another
type of device, Model 32-S, which is marketed under the trademark
SAF-T-COIL by the assignee of the subject application. However, it
differs in several respects which affect its operation. First of
all, the material forming the loops 30a and 30b has a cross-section
approximately one-half the thickness, thereby giving the desired
characteristics of flexibility both in the final shape of the loops
in the uterus and, also, to permit the two loops to depart from
their original coplanar relationship when in the undeformed state.
This results in some loss of the "springiness" of retentive memory
characteristics of the material which, in accordance with the
invention, is desired. As a second difference, the free end of the
loop 30a, which does not have the head 36, terminates at the
diameter line rather than being extending thereabove as in the
Model 32S. This also retracts somewhat from the springiness of loop
30a to permit the loop to more readily conform to the shape of the
uterus wall, that is, the loop 30a has less of a tendency to spring
back when deflected toward the stem of the device.
Considering now the use of the device, referring to FIG. 2, the
device is shown withdrawn within the tubular inserter 22. This is
accomplished by the person installing the device grasping the free
trailing end of the plunger and pulling it out of the trailing end
of the inserter. This applies tension through the thread 16 to draw
first the stem of the device into the inserter tube and then the
two loops 30a and 30b. The loops are stretched out in the tubular
inserter into a more linear shape.
After the device has been placed in the position shown in FIG. 2,
it is ready for insertion into the uterus. The person installing
the device advances the leading end of the system, with the device
sheathed in the tubular inserter, into the uterus through the
vaginal opening. Prior to doing this, the uterus may be inspected
with a sound to determine its position and tilt, if any. A suitable
sound for accomplishing this is shown, for example, in U.S. Pat.
No. 3,630,190 to Samuel Baker, issued Dec. 28, 1971, which is
assigned to the assignee of the same application.
After the inserter tube has been oriented in the proper position in
the uterine cavity, the person installing the device pushes the
plunger. The leading end of the plunger engages the end of the stem
of the device and pushes it out of the inserter tube. The inserter
tube is then withdrawn through the vaginal opening and the thread
is cut off. A length of the thread is left for inspection
purposes.
The act of withdrawing the device into the tubular inserter and
then unsheathing it, distorts the device from its original shape
shown in FIG. 1 due to the fact that the material of the loops does
not have a fully retentive memory. This distortion normally would
result in the loops 30a, 30b being rotated upwardly somewhat from
the position shown in FIG. 1. This distortion is unimportant since
the shape of the uterine cavity varies from patient to patient.
FIG. 3 shows the device located within the uterus. The drawing
depicts the loops 30 of the device being deformed to conform to the
general shape of the walls of the uterine cavity. As seen, the
loops are distorted from their original shape of FIG. 1. This is
characteristic of the device of the subject invention. That is, the
relative "softness" of the loop material, due to its relatively
small cross-section, and reduction in springiness makes the loops
of the device more conformable to the uterus wall than prior art
devices. The latter rely more heavily on the springiness
characteristic of the material and also make a smaller area of
contact with the uterus walls, where the device has a curved
configuration. The straight wall portion 33 of the device of FIG.
1, which joins the upper and lower loop sections 31, 32, also
presents a larger area of wall contact than if the loop were made
fully arcuate or curved.
FIG. 4 shows a view taken transverse to that of FIG. 3. This shows
a slight shift of the two loops out of their original coplanar
relationship. This shifting, which occurs readily due to the
relative softness of the material, is also desirable since it
permits better conformation of the device to the shape of the
uterine cavity.
It should be understood that the uterus can change its shape
somewhat depending upon the position and muscular activity.
Therefore, by making the device in such a way that it better
conforms to the shape of the uterine cavity and soft enough to move
with the uterus walls as they move, the device has a higher
acceptance and lower expulsion rate. Further, the relative softness
of the material reduces the trauma when the device is inserted.
While a quantitative measurement of trauma is impossible, patients,
particularly nullipares, having the device of the subject invention
inserted, report very little discomfort during the insertion
process. This also is believed to aid in the reduction of the
expulsion rate.
* * * * *