U.S. patent number 3,881,437 [Application Number 05/454,384] was granted by the patent office on 1975-05-06 for method of making pop-in container closure.
Invention is credited to Frederick G. J. Grise, Walter C. Lovell.
United States Patent |
3,881,437 |
Lovell , et al. |
May 6, 1975 |
Method of making pop-in container closure
Abstract
A container lid, by a sequence of forming operations including
the steps of shear-coining over preferably transversely convex die
surfaces to provide a fractured but integral wall section, and
usually a swedging, provides a peripherally dilated button portion
which adequately resists internal fluid pressures, yet is
disruptable by external finger pressure urging the button portion
inwardly. The button may be provided with a non-disruptable or
hinge portion, or formed to enable it to fall into the container,
the button in either case not being separately disposable. No
harmful closure edges are exposed by the method herein
disclosed.
Inventors: |
Lovell; Walter C. (Wilbraham,
MA), Grise; Frederick G. J. (Wilbraham, MA) |
Family
ID: |
26987953 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/454,384 |
Filed: |
March 25, 1974 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
331844 |
Feb 12, 1973 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
413/17; 413/18;
220/268 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B65D
17/401 (20180101); B21D 51/383 (20130101); B65D
17/404 (20180101) |
Current International
Class: |
B21D
51/38 (20060101); B21d 051/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;113/121C,15A
;220/27,48,53,54 ;83/7 ;225/2 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Herbst; Richard J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Johnson; Carl E. White; Vincent A.
Megley; Richard B.
Parent Case Text
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation-in-part of Application Ser. No.
331,844, filed Feb. 12, 1973 in the names of Walter Lovell and
Frederick G. J. Grise, and relating to "Environmental Pop-In Button
Closure for a Can", now abandoned.
Claims
Having thus described my invention what I claim as new and desire
to be secured by Letters Patent of the United States is:
1. The method of making a manually disruptable pop-in type of
button closure for a planar metal container lid comprising:
a. depressing the lid in a generally closed, continuous path to
provide an integral button portion having inner and outer bounding
walls respectively including opposed parallel surfaces inclined to
the plane of the lid,
b. shear-coining one of the bounding walls to form a lengthwise
indentation in one of said inclined surfaces thereof and
concommitantly produce a fractured but integral section extending
between the other of said surfaces and the bottom of the
indentation for a portion of its length, and then
c. swedging the indented bounding wall to dilate a face of the
indentation at least partly outwardly relative to said fractured
section and thereby effectively lock the closure to the container
lid.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the outer bounding wall is formed
in part with transverse convexity, and the shear-coining is
effected in the outer convex surface of the outer wall in
cooperation with a similarly convexly shaped back-up die whereby
the metal of the wall adjacent to the fracture is constrained to
flow outwardly peripherally partly to reclose said fracture.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the shear-coined indentation is
formed with an axially tapering die to incur the fracture in
diminishing degree as it approaches a non-fractured hinging
locality of the button.
4. The method of making a manually disruptable pop-in type of
button closure for a sheet metal container lid comprising:
a. depressing a portion of the lid with a tool having a rounded
ridge to form transversely convex inner and outer bounding walls at
least partly defining a button portion lying substantially in the
plane of the lid,
b. while the remainer of the lid is unrestrained, shear-coining the
outer wall lengthwise with varying penetration in its transversely
convex portion over a complemental back-up die to produce a
fractured but integral section in an inner portion of the outer
wall, and after irregular conjoint edges of the fractured section
have substantially sprung together to dissipate tension incurred
during metal flow of the shear-coining,
c. swedging the locality of convergence of said walls against said
die to dilate the outer wall and thus urge the metal on both sides
of the fracture into closed association.
5. The method of claim 4 and the additional step of coating at
least the fractured locality of the button portion with a
sealant.
6. The method of claim 4 wherein step b includes yieldingly
clamping the button portion against said rounded ridge by means of
a resillient pad nested in a shear-coining die between its cutting
edges.
7. The method of making a manually disruptable pop-in type of
button closure for a container lid comprising:
a. forming a continuous depression and consequent ridge in the lid
largely to define the closure and the shape of its outer
sectionally convex boundary wall,
b. longitudinally shear-coining said wall in its sectionally convex
portion with a tool having a cutting edge, an adjacent coining face
disposed substantially at 90.degree. to said edge and having
uniform width a fraction of the thickness of the lid, and an
angularly related coining face concommitantly to open an
indentation and provide a fractured but integral section extending
from the indentation, and
c. partly reclosing said indentation and the material of said
fracture by a compressive swedging blow striking against said ridge
and/or the wall material adjacent thereto thereby rupturably
securing the closure to the lid.
8. The method of making a manually distruptable pop-in type of
button closure in a sheet metal container lid comprising:
a. forming a depression in the lid having continuous inner and
outer bounding walls convergent in a ridge,
b. while a convex back-up die surface engages the lid on one side
thereof at the surface of said lid depression and along at least a
portion of said outer wall, indenting the latter lengthwise with a
die having an angularly related cutting edge and coining face to
provide a fractured but integral section in the outer wall along at
least a portion of its length, the width of the face being a
fraction of the lid thickness and said integral section being cold
worked by the momentary partial separation induced by the coining
face, and
c. then swedging said ridge against said back-up die surface partly
to close said indentation and force the mating metal of the
fractured but integral section to flow into closer substantially
sealed association.
9. The method of making a manually disruptable pop-in type of
button closure in a sheet metal container lid, which comprises:
a. forming a continuous trough and opposing rounded ridge
protruding from the lid surface and defining a major portion of a
relatively depressible closure, the closure having an outer wall
portion sloping to the lid surface and not folded upon itself,
and
b. shear-coining said outer wall unfolded portion along a line
spaced between the lid surface and the crest of the ridge against a
convexly sectioned back-up die to form an indentation channel of
approximately 0.001 inch to 0.002 inch in width and extending
lengthwise in said wall and tapering from a maximum depth providing
a locality of incipient fracture to a minimum depth, and leaving a
locality of no indentation providing hingeable connection of the
button to the lid.
10. The method of making a manually disruptable pop-in type of
button closure for a low-pressure metal container lid
comprising:
a. depressing the lid in a closed continuous path to provide an
integral button having a sectionally non-sinuous wall including
opposite parallel surfaces inclined to the lid, and
b. shear-coining the wall with an axially cooperating tool and die
acting peripherally along a line spaced from the general plane of
the lid to form a lengthwise, narrow, and angular indentation in
one of said inclined surfaces, the width and angular disposition of
a coining face of the tool being selected to momentarily induce
local tension nearly but not quite sufficient to incur concommitant
partial fracture of the wall portion worked against the die between
the bottom of the indentation and the other of said surfaces.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention pertains to a method of making a tabless, push-in
type closure for the sheet metal lid of a container adapted to
retain fluid under pressure.
In the prior art, several different closures of the so-called
"pop-in" type have been proposed. Some required a leverage tab or
lifting projection and scoring in the lid, and others such as
disclosed, for instance, in U.S. Letters Patent 3,227,304 to
Asbury, or U.S. Pat. No. 3,334,775 to Klein et al., specify a score
line in a flat region, or a score line in a wide angle notch, but
in a fold such as to preclude reliable operation or uniformity in
manufacture. When the latter types can be "pushed-in" they commonly
have inadequate strength to resist internal pressure such as may be
present in a carbonated beverage or a pasteurized fluid.
An easy-open lid construction providing no separately disposable
parts is generally recognized as very desirable provided it can
safely retain fluid pressures and yet be uniformly reproduced by a
practical method.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In view of the foregoing, it is an object of this invention to
provide a simple, economical method for making reliable push-in
closures in sheet metal container lids.
More specifically, another object of this invention is to provide
improved technique for forming and, in effect, reinforcing the
margins of push-in button portions of can lids whereby fluids can
be safely contained yet manual access be readily available by
rupture of the margins.
To these ends, and as herein illustrated, a metal lid is first
formed with a recess providing a button having inner and outer
bounding walls merging in a peripheral ridge on one side of the
lid. Next a coin-shearing operation is performed, preferably in a
convex portion of the outer button wall, to provide (as per one
mode of the invention.) a peripheral indentation having convergent
angular faces and a fractured but integral section extending
through the metal of the wall. Then, while the thus indented wall
is backed by a die having complemental (preferably convex)
curvature, a swedging operation against the peripheral ridge
dilates the metal of the outer wall to force one of the indentation
faces into partly overlapping relation to the other face, by a few
thousandths of an inch over its length, and enables the metal in
the locality of fracture to spring substantially closed. A lacquer
coating may thereafter be applied for sealing, if desired, to the
button internal surface, but is often unnecessary.
The swedging step can sometimes be omitted following shear-coining.
Thus, for example, in low-pressure can construction such as might
be used for oils, soups, etc., a narrower coining face (on order of
only 0.001-0.002 inch) may be employed producing no fracture. In
general, however, usage of shear-coining dies having a coin face
wider than 0.002 inch, and whenever a fractured but integral
section is incurred, necessitates the added step of swedging.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The foregoing and other features of the invention will now be more
particularly described in connection with an illustrative
embodiment and with reference to the accompanying drawings thereof,
in which;
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of one product afforded by use of the
invention, a can top having a circular closed closure button hinged
to the lid;
FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1 and showing the button pushed
inwardly;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged diametral section showing a padded
coin-shearing die and a back-up die about to commence operation on
a lid, the button portion of which has previously been struck up
from the inside, or the surrounding material has been depressed
relative to the lid by a drawing die;
FIG. 4 is a section similar to FIG. 3 showing the button and parts
at bottom or peripheral partial fracture opening stage;
FIG. 5 is a section similar to FIG. 4 showing the parts at a
subsequent released or partial fracture reclosing stage;
FIG. 6 is a section similar to FIGS. 3-5 but indicating the final
stage wherein a swedging die dilates a wall of the shear-coined
indentation and tensions the fracture web over a convex back-up
surface;
FIG. 7 is a further enlarged detail view, predicated on a typical
photomicrograph showing the released button wall having a sprung
together partial fracture and a dilated indentation face at least
partly overhanging the wall fracture, and a lacquer coating applied
thereto; and
FIG. 8 is a perspective view corresponding in part to a portion of
FIG. 2 and showing the closure, made by the method herein
described, being opened.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In the following disclosure it will be appreciated that certain
critical physical distinctions resulting from method steps
obtaining in this case over prior art procedures are dimensionally
small and possibly to the point of being invisible to the naked
eye. It will nevertheless be understood, as hereinafter pointed
out, that despite the small dimensional changes involved, the
significance of the novel steps to be described is real and of
considerable importance from both the standpoint of manufacturing
advantage and improved closure performance.
FIG. 1 shows a conventional can 10 having a rim 12, usually the
chime of an otherwise planar sheet metal lid 14 (FIGS. 1-8). A
pop-in closure 16 for instance of circular shape like a button, to
be manually pressed inwardly for opening the container lid is
preferably positioned adjacent to the chime. It will be understood
that neither the lid or its button portion 16 need be circular. The
lid 14 is first formed as by a die (not shown) to provide its
button portion 16 with a surrounding continuous depression 18
bounded by inner and outer walls 20,22 respectively. Preferably the
flat of the integral button portion 16 remains only slightly
depressed with respect to the general plane of the lid 14 so as to
readily indicate the locality to be opened inwardly.
It will be noted (FIGS. 3-5) that the button walls 20,22 to be
processed by steps hereinafter explained are desirably partly
convex in section and merge in a rounded trough 24. Walls 20,22
simply inclined to the plane of the lid without being convex may in
some cases be satisfactorily employed but are not usually
preferred. Regardless of the care with which the sheet metal is
originally made, there is no real control over its grain structure.
Accordingly, scoring a closure as thin as that found, for instance,
in beer cans requires an extra degree of penetration and sizing
control nicely afforded by the mentioned wall convexity in order to
prevent leakage on the one hand and yet, on the other hand, insure
manual accessibility to the container contents without requiring
extra finger strength. While it has been found that the invention
may be practiced on the inner wall 20, and whether it be
transversely arcuate or straight and inclined to the lid, it is
generally preferable to operate on the convex portion of the outer
wall 22, and usually at least about a third of its length, as will
hereinafter be explained.
Assuming the lid button 16 to be substantially in the configuration
shown in FIG. 3, the outer wall 22 is next shear-coined lengthwise
in its convex periphery. For this purpose an upper back-up die 26
(FIGS. 3-6) has an annularly projecting rounded ridge 28 formed to
fit in and engage the trough 24. A lower shear-coining die 29
(FIGS. 3-5) is arranged to cooperate coaxially with the back-up die
26, and has a vertically disposed cutting edge 30, an angularly
related narrow coining face 32, and a longer inclined coining face
34 extending outwardly from the face 32. The coining face 32
commonly will have a uniform width which is a fraction of the
thickness of the lid, depending on the particular sheet metal and
the extent of fracture, if any, desired, face width being greater
for tougher metals. In this connection it may be noted that wall
fracture, i.e. providing a fractured but still integral peripheral
section, as a result of the shear-coining step is generally
desired, unless the can tops to be made are for low pressure usage
such as containment of oils, soups, etc. For the low pressure
applications coin face 32 may be narrowed to approximately 0.001 to
0.002 inch without causing fracture and hence allowing swedging to
be omitted; otherwise swedging is required as will later be
explained.
To clampingly hold the button 16 against bodily shifting laterally
on the die ridge 28 when the convex portion of the outer wall 22 is
peripherally shear-coined as shown in FIG. 4 during relative
approach of the dies 26,29, the latter die preferably has a
yieldingly compressible rubber pad 36 of uniform thickness nested
within the cutting edge 30.
As shown in FIG. 3, the coining face 32 axially tapers from a
maximum projection above the pad 36 on the right side of the die
periphery to a minimum on the left side substantially flush with
the pad 36. In this manner the periphery of the outer wall 32 is
variably shear-coined, providing a controlled indentation extending
substantially all around the button 16 but of tapering lesser depth
in the left-hand portion than in the right-hand portion as shown in
FIG. 4. The depth of the shear-coining is usually selected to
insure that the coining indentation concomittantly causes a partial
fracture 38 (FIGS. 4-7) all the way through the metal and extending
for roughly from about 120.degree. to 180.degree. around its
periphery. This fracture serves as an easily started locality of
rupture in the complete button. The locality of no indentation,
generally opposite to the locality of greatest indentation and/or
fracture, will serve as a hinge H (FIGS. 2 and 8) when the button
is pushed into the can 10.
It is to be noted that shear-coining the button wall 22 over a
transversely convex back-up die surface, i.e. outwardly of the
center line of the annular die ridge 28, provides both a refined
control of the desired indentation and degree of the resultant
fracture 38, and an improved service life for the shear-coining die
29. The latter is probably largely due to the freedom of the metal
in the wall 22 to flow as necessary during tensioning outwardly
over the curved surface of the die 26. It will be understood,
nevertheless, that this invention may be practiced on either of the
walls 20 or 22 and whether they be convex, concave or straight but
inclined to the lid.
When the dies 26,29 are relatively separated heightwise as shown in
FIG. 5 after shear-coining, resilience of the pad 36, which had
been distorted as indicated in FIG. 4, frees the lid for the last
step about to be described. No wall material has been removed. It
will be understood that the nearly 90.degree. angle at the bottom
of the peripheral indentation or groove initially imparted by the
convergent cutting edge 30 and the adjacent coining face 32 as
shown in FIG. 4 is partly reduced as indicated in FIG. 5 when
relative die retraction permits residual tension in the wall
material to be dispelled. Accordingly, mating irregular metal at
the fracture 38 springs substantially closed without appreciaable
misalignment of confronting edges. No complete separation is
incurred at the bottom of the wall indentation.
The final and perhaps most important step in this button forming
process, assuming the fracture 38 was incurred, will next be
described with reference to FIGS. 6 and 7. With the backing die 26
still in its work-engaging position, a swedging die 40 (FIG. 6)
having a flat face 42 compressively bears on the walls 20,22 at the
annular locality of their convergence. This imposes a flat 44 on
the periphery of the button 16 opposite to the depression 18 and
causes metal of the indented wall 22 to flow outwardly. More
significantly, and as better shown in FIG. 7, as a consequence of
the swedging an indentation face 46 of the wall 22 is dilated and
hence at least partly overlaps a convergent indentation face 48
imparted by the coin-face 32. This overlap which may be on the
order of about two to four thousandths of an inch on opposite sides
of the button respectively, is disposed outwardly of the fracture
38. The swedging therefore stiffens the button wall in the vicinity
of the fracture, and generally appears to close the partial
fracture along its length thus locking the closure 16 disruptably
to the lid 14. A lacquer coating 50 (FIG. 7) may be applied at
least to seal the fracture and the indentation on the inside of the
completed lid.
Referring now more particularly to FIGS. 2 and 8, when the hinge H
of the button 16 is adjacent to the can chime, suitable indica, for
instance an arrow (not shown), may indicate the diametrically
opposite locality of deepest shear-coining and most complete but
still partial fracture where external finger pressure on the button
can most easily start rupture. Once rupture has been started along
the fracture, continued tearing of the metal along the remainder of
the wall indentation requires less pressure. It will be understood
that if internal hinging of the button H is not desired, a complete
360.degree. shear-coining and fracture as herein explained will
enable the closure to be separated inwardly and thereby deposited
within the can so as not to be separately disposable.
From the foregoing it will be clear the swedging step provides a
circumferential "growth" or dilation of the button 16, expanding
its initial transverse dimension or diameter D (perhaps on the
order of about six to eight thousandths of an inch total) outwardly
of the fracture 38 to overlap a part of the adjacent indentation
wall as indicated in FIG. 7. Accordingly internal fluid pressure in
the can tends only to close the wall indentation and the fracture
38 but has no significant disrupting effect thereon. At no time
during closure formation is an edge of the closure separated from a
"mating" edge of the lid; the edges consequently are maintained in
exact alignment insuring restoration of sealing relation when they
are forced together by the swedging.
The described method of manufacture is applicable to various shapes
of buttons and containers, and is economically practiced with a
high degree of precision control and hence uniformly reliable
results.
* * * * *