U.S. patent number 3,876,391 [Application Number 05/174,546] was granted by the patent office on 1975-04-08 for process of preparing novel micro emulsions.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Texaco, Inc.. Invention is credited to George W. Eckert, Frederic C. McCoy.
United States Patent |
3,876,391 |
McCoy , et al. |
April 8, 1975 |
Process of preparing novel micro emulsions
Abstract
This invention concerns a process for preparing
water-in-petroleum type of micro emulsions. These emulsions are
stable and clear and contain substantially greater quantities of
water-soluble additives than it is normally possible to disperse
when using the petroleum fraction alone.
Inventors: |
McCoy; Frederic C. (Beacon,
NY), Eckert; George W. (Wappingers Falls, NY) |
Assignee: |
Texaco, Inc. (New York,
NY)
|
Family
ID: |
26870341 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/174,546 |
Filed: |
August 24, 1971 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
803459 |
Feb 28, 1969 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
44/301; 516/24;
516/25; 516/27; 516/28; 516/30; 516/29; 516/26 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C10L
1/328 (20130101); C10L 1/10 (20130101); C10L
1/106 (20130101); C10L 1/191 (20130101); C10L
1/2431 (20130101); C10L 1/125 (20130101); C10L
1/1985 (20130101); C10L 1/2658 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C10L
1/32 (20060101); C10L 1/10 (20060101); C10L
1/24 (20060101); C10L 1/18 (20060101); C10L
1/26 (20060101); C10L 1/12 (20060101); C10l
001/32 () |
Field of
Search: |
;44/51,71,72
;252/308,309,312 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Wyman; Daniel E.
Assistant Examiner: Smith; Y. H.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Whaley; Thomas H. Ries; Carl G.
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 803,459
filed Feb. 28, 1969 now abandoned in the United States Patent
Office.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A stable, clear motor gasoline composition having substantially
higher octane numbers than unmodified base fuels consisting
essentially of an admixture of the following components in the
proportions indicated:
a. from about 58 to 87 parts by volume of gasoline,
b. from about 6 to 16 parts by volume of water,
c. from about 3 to 8 parts by volume of at least one
gasoline-soluble surfactant having an HLB value from about 5 to 9,
said surfactants selected from the group consisting of diethylene
glycol monolaurate, sorbitol monopalmitate, sorbitol monolaurate,
polyoxyalkylated mannitoldiolate, polyoxyalkylated sorbitrol
monostearate, polyoxyalkylated sorbitol monolaurate and
polyoxyalkylated alkylated phenols,
d. from about 3 to 8 parts by volume of at least one water-soluble
surfactant having an HLB value from about 10 to 35, selected from
the group consisting of C.sub.21 tertiary alkyl primary amine
acetate, dodecylamine hydrochloride, ammonium lauryl sulfate,
triethanolamine sulfate, ethanolamine octyl ortho phosphate,
polyoxyalkylated nonyl phenol, polyoxyalkylated stearyl amides,
polyoxyalkylated lauryl amides, polyoxyalkylated oleyl amides,
polyoxyalkylated sorbitolmonooleate, polyoxyalkylated sorbitol
monolaurate, polyoxyalkylated sorbitol monostearate, polyoxylated
sorbitol monopalmitate, polyoxyethylated stearyl alcohol,
polyoxyethylated oleyl alcohol and polyoxyethylated tridecyl
alcohol,
e. from about 0.5 to 10 parts by volume of a water-soluble,
insufficiently gasoline-soluble, additive selected from the group
consisting of acetamide, formamide, monoethanolamine, ethylene
diamine, propane diamine, and m-phenylene diamine, said parts by
volume ratio of water-soluble surfactant petroleum fraction-soluble
surfactant do not exceed about 5:1.
2. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein the additive is ethylene
glycol.
3. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein the additive is
formamide.
4. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein the additive is
ethanolamine.
5. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein the additive is ethylene
diamine.
6. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein the additive is
urea.
7. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein the additive is
acetamide.
8. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein the additive is propane
diamine.
9. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein the additive is
m-phenylene diamine.
10. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein the additive is
formaldehyde.
Description
This invention relates to a process for increasing the quantity of
water soluble additives that can be incorporated into petroleum
fractions and to the emulsions produced therein.
More particularly, this invention concerns a process for preparing
stable, clear micro emulsions of petroleum fractions and water
containing substantially greater quantities of water-soluble
additives than is possible using the hydrocarbon fractions
alone.
The use of additives in petroleum fractions derived from petroleum
refining is well established in the industry. Additives are
commonly utilized to enhance, improve, modify, suppress or change
some property or characteristic of the hydrocarbon fraction
treated. For example, lubricating oils contain viscosity index
improvers, pour point depressants, oxidation and corrosion
inhibitors, while furnace and residual fuel oils employ
stabilizers, corrosion inhibitors and the like. Middle distillates,
such as diesel fuels and jet fuels particularly, utilize a variety
of additives to improve performance. These include ignition
improvers, cetane improvers, corrosion inhibitors, deicers among
others. Many additives, including octane number improvers, gum
inhibitors, metal deactivators and rust preventives are commonly
employed in gasolines.
One of the limiting factors in the use of many potentially
attractive additives is their poor solubility in the neat petroleum
fraction to be treated. For example, a good number of amides,
diols, alkanolamines, polyamines and aldehydes which have good
solubility in water are insufficiently soluble in petroleum
fractions to impart any significant additive effect. As used
herein, good solubility in water is defined as permitting a clear
solution containing at least a 10 percent by weight of the additive
in water to be prepared which is stable at 25.degree. C.
Insufficiently soluble in a petroleum fraction is defined as not
permitting a clear 0.1 percent by weight solution of the additive
to be prepared which is stable at 25.degree. C. (77.degree. F.) in
petroleum fractions covering a range of volatility from an Initial
Boiling Point (IBP) of about 70.degree. F. (21.degree. C.) to an
End Point (EP) of about 650.degree. F. (343.degree. C.) as
determined using ASTM Method D-86.
The use of micro-emulsions of petroleum fractions in water is old
in the art per se. These emulsions have been used in order to
increase the quantity of certain additives in said petroleum
fractions. Unfortunately, the results have been generally
unsatisfactory particularly where the emulsions end use is in motor
fuel compositions. One problem has been the unattractive, milky or
opaque appearance of the emulsions. A more important failing has
been the instability of the emulsion. For example, even the best
emulsion eventually separates into two phases under stress and even
under ideal storage conditions, some separation occurs within a
relatively short time. The breaking of the emulsion is undesirable
since it then becomes impossible to deliver homogenous fuel samples
into the carburetor. Another problem of the prior art covering
fuel-water emulsions has been that the surfactants are inherently
corrosive to metals or have contained ash-forming metals.
Furthermore, preparation of the emulsions of the prior art has
required the use of high speed, high shear devices such as colloid
mills and homogenizers.
Recently the inventors have developed a novel process of preparing
stable, transparent water-in-oil emulsions, capable of dispersing
substantially greater quantities of many water-soluble additives
than can be dispersed in the neat petroleum fraction alone. Not
only does the process enable the preparation of additive-rich
dispersions but, in addition, the dispersions have viscosities
similar to those of the petroleum fraction and thus, in the case of
gasolines, they are readily carburetted. Also, they are perfectly
clear to the eye for extended periods of time and utilize
non-corrosive and ashless surfactants. In addition, the dispersions
can be made using only moderate agitation such as is provided by
conventional fuel blending equipment. This unique combination of
properties was heretofore unobtainable and represents a significant
advance in the art.
It is therefore an object of this invention, among others, to
provide a novel process for preparing stable, clear, low-viscosity
dispersions of petroleum fractions (such as gasoline or middle
distillates) with water containing much greater quantities of
water-soluble additives than has previously been possible.
It is a further object of this invention to provide stable,
transparent, additive-rich "water-in-oil" emulsions which can be
used as concentrates to incorporate substantial quantities of
additives into petroleum fractions in which the additives are
normally insufficiently soluble.
A specific object of this invention is the preparation of stable
and clear gasoline compositions modified by the addition of
water-soluble additives, said gasoline having increased octane
numbers compared to the unmodified base fuel.
Additional objects will suggest themselves to those skilled in the
art after a further reading of this application.
In practice, the above objects are achieved by a process wherein
micro-emulsions comprising petroleum fractions and water are
prepared using any of the procedures described below.
In one procedure an aqueous solution of the one or more
water-soluble additives to be dispersed and an effective amount of
at least one water soluble surfactant are added to the petroleum
fraction preferably with brisk agitation. Then an effective amount
of at least one petroleum fractionsoluble surfactant is
incrementally added (titrated) to the agitated two phase system
until a clear blend is produced. At this point a stable, clear,
micro-emulsion of "water-in-petroleum" containing the surfactants,
water, petroleum fractions and additives is formed in which the
average particle diameter of the dispersed phase is 0.1 micron or
smaller. These micro-emulsions can be used to achieve the objects
of this invention. This procedure is particularly useful where the
quantities of the two different surfactants required are unknown.
The following represent alternative procedures.
In one alternative process the petroleum fraction to be emulsified
is blended with the required quantities (as determined supra) of at
least one petroleum-fractionsoluble surfactant and at least one
water-soluble surfactant until a homogeneous mixture is obtained.
Then an aqueous solution of the water-soluble additive or additives
to be dispersed is added with agitation until a clear dispersion
results. Again, the stability of the resultant microemulsions is as
above.
Another alternative process is to prepare two separate blends, one
of distillate containing the required amount of
petroleum-fraction-soluble surfactant or surfactants, the other of
water containing required amount water-soluble additive and
water-soluble surfactants. Then the water blend is blended into the
distillate blend until a clear micro-emulsion, identical in all its
properties to those above, is prepared.
To further aid in the understanding of the invention, the following
supplementary disclosure is submitted:
A. PETROLEUM FRACTIONS
As used throughout this disclosure, the term refers to fluid
products derived from petroleum refining having an Initial Boiling
Point range from about 21.degree. C (70.degree. F.) to an End Point
of about 343.degree. C. (650.degree. F.) Illustrative fractions
include middle distillates (such as gas oils, furnace oils,
kerosene, diesel fuels) motor gasolines and aviation gasolines.
B. SURFACTANTS
1. HLB VALUE OF SURFACTANT
The term "HLB" value as used herein refers to the
hydrophile-lipophile balance of a surfactant. That is, the relative
simultaneous attraction that the surfactant demonstrates for water
and oil. Substances having a high HLB, above about 12, are highly
hydrophilic (and poorly lipophilic) while substances having a low
HLB, below about 8, are lipophilic and consequently poorly
hydrophilic. Those having an HLB between about 8 and 12 are
intermediate. An extensive discussion of HLB can be found in the
literature particularly in "Emulsions: Theory and Practice," by P.
Becher, published by Reinhold Publishing Corp., N.Y., 1957.
2. PETROLEUM-FRACTION-SOLUBLE
As used throughout this application, refers to surfactants of the
anionic, cationic or nonionic type. They must be both ashless upon
ignition and soluble to the extent that at least a clear 10 percent
by volume solution and preferably a clear 30 percent by volume
solution of the surfactant can be prepared which is stable at
25.degree. C. An additional requirement is that when in the
presence of both the petroleum fraction and water they are
preferentially soluble in the petroleum fraction.
Illustrative petroleum fraction soluble surfactants include, among
many others, the following materials sold under various proprietary
means by different manufacturers; aliphatic esters of diethylene
glycol such as diethylene glycol monolaurate, the mono and diesters
of polyols such as sorbitol mono-palmitate, sorbitol monolaurate,
polyoxyalkylated mono-di- and poly aliphatic esters of polyols such
as mannitol dioleate, sorbitol monostearate, sorbitol monolaurate,
as well as certain of the polyoxyalkylated alkylated phenols. In
fact, the only limitation other than their solubility in petroleum
fractions and freedom from ash-forming components is that the
surfactants have hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) values, as
outlined in the preceding section, in the range of about 3-10.
3. WATER-SOLUBLE SURFACTANTS
As used throughout this disclosure this term refers to surfactants
of the anionic, nonionic or cationic type which must be ashless
upon ignition and soluble in water to the extent that at least a
clear 10 percent by volume solution and preferably at least a clear
30 percent by volume solution of the surfactant can be prepared
which is stable at 25.degree. C. Furthermore, in the presence of
both petroleum fraction and water, they are preferentially
water-soluble.
Illustrative water-soluble surfactants include, among many others,
the following materials sold under various proprietary names by
different manufacturers; the fatty acid salts of polyalkanolamines,
such as triethanolamine oleate, amine salts such as C.sub.21
tertiary alkyl primaray amine acetate and dodecylamine
hydrochloride, quaternary ammonium salts such as soya trimethyl
ammonium chloride, alkylated tertiary amine salts such as
N-cetyl-N-ethyl morpholinium ethosulfate, as well as certain of the
polyoxylated alkylated phenols, polyoxyalkylated alkyl ethers,
polyoxyalkylated aliphatic esters of polyols, polyoxyalkylated
aliphatic amines, alcohols, acids and amides. More specific
illustrations of these polyoxyalkylated materials include nonyl
phenol, stearyl, lauryl and oleyl amides, sorbitolmonooleate,
sorbitol monolaurate, sorbitol monostearate and sorbitol
monopalmitate, as well as stearyl, oleyl and tridecyl alcohols, all
polyoxyethylated with from about 8-50 moles of ethylene oxide.
Again, the only limitation other than water solubility and freedom
from ash is that the HLB value, as defined in the preceding
section, be in the range of about 10-35.
It should be noted that the sole limitation on the use of the
various "pairs" of surfactants, is that the use of cationic and
anionic surfactants in the same dispersion are to be avoided since
they usually tend to be incompatible.
C. WATER-SOLUBLE ADDITIVES
As indicated earlier, this term refers to various compounds of
diverse structure which share in common: (a) that they have
sufficiently good solubility in water to enable a clear 10 percent
by weight solution of the additive to be prepared which is stable
at 25.degree. C; (b) that they are insufficiently soluble in
petroleum fractions (such as gasoline and middle distillate
fractions) to change, enhance or otherwise favorably modify some
property or characteristic of the petroleum fraction such as octane
or cetane number, surface ignition properties, smoke formation,
exhaust emissions or the like. Gasoline may contain octane
improvers, antioxidants, metal deactivators and anti-icing agents
among other types of additives.
The favored water-soluble additives which function especially well
in this process and which form stable and clear dispersions are
those selected from the group consisting of aliphatic diols,
aliphatic amides, alkanolamines, polyamines and aliphatic
aldehydes.
The additives particularly preferred are certain specific compounds
of the group which have been found to increase octane numbers in
motor fuels when they comprise from about 1 to 10 percent by volume
or higher of the final fuel dispersion. These preferred additives
are selected from the group consisting of formamide, acetamide,
ethylene glycol, urea, ethylene diamine, propylene diamine,
meta-phenyline diamine and formaldehyde.
D. CONCENTRATIONS AND RATIOS OF THE COMPONENTS
1. WATER
Ordinarily, the amount of water required to solubilize the
water-soluble additive or additives to be used is the most
important factor in determining the concentration of the other
components. A minimal amount of water is employed depending upon
the solubility of the additive in water and the amount of additive
required to achieve the desired effect. In most instances the
volume of water will make up from 0.5-30 percent of the final
dispersion with the best results being obtained where the water
makes up from 5-10 percent of the final dispersion volume.
2. ADDITIVES
The total parts by volume of additives employed per 100 parts by
volume of micro-emulsion is a variable dependent upon several
factors. These include the application for which the additive is
employed, the cost of the additive, as well as the maximum amount
of additive that can be dispersed in a given micro-emulsion
prepared using a particular pair of surfactants. In many instances
a range of from 0.1 to 10 parts by volume of additive per 100 parts
by volume of the final microemulsion will suffice. More usually, a
narrower range of 2 to 7 parts of additive per 100 parts by volume
of microemulsion can be employed.
For example, to increase the octane number of gasoline, each 100
parts by volume of the final, clear gasoline composition will
comprise:
a. from about 1 to 10 parts by volume additive,
b. from about 6 to 16 parts by volume of water,
c. from about 6 to 16 parts by volume of total surfactant, and
d. from about 87 to 58 parts by volume of the gasoline whose octane
number is to be raised.
3. SURFACTANTS
The total amount of surfactant pairs required and the ratio of the
two types to each other (high HLB, abbreviated as "H" and low HLB,
abbreviated as "L") depends primarily on the amount of water, the
nature of the additives and their concentration in the formulation
as are discussed below:
a. Total amount of surfactant - Each surfactant may comprise as
little as 1 part by volume or as much as 12 parts by volume. This
range of quantities is referred to as an effective amount of
surfactant.
b. Combined HLB of the surfactant pair - This is calculated by the
following formula: ##EQU1##
The combined HLB of the surfactant pair may range from about 7 to
20, however, the best results are consistently obtained at 8-12 and
for this reason this is preferred.
c. Ratio of H:L surfactants - Whatever the intended end use, it is
critical that the proper ratio of hydrophilic (water soluble)
surfactant to lipophilic (petroleum fractionsoluble) surfactant be
used. The "H":"L" ratio is calculated as follows: ##EQU2##
In order to obtain the microemulsions of this invention, the
calculated "H":"L" ratio should not be greater than about 6:1 and
preferably from about 3:1 to 0.8:1. If a ratio of H:L substantially
exceeds 6:1, the emulsions become either exceedingly viscous
oil-in-water systems, if mixed by the procedure of Nixon, et al.,
or unstable mixtures if conventional, high speed mixing is used. In
either case the products are completely unsuitable for the
applications of this invention.
d. Petroleum fractions - these make up the major portion of the
total dispersion volume and can comprise from 58 to 87 parts by
volume of the dispersion. Ordinarily, from 70 to 80 parts by volume
of the final dispersion are present as the petroleum fraction.
Included in this category are the hydrocarbons present in
conventional motor gasolines, kerosenes, furnace oils, diesel fuels
and gas oils.
E. AGITATION
Whenever agitation is mentioned in the above procedures it is to be
understood that conventional stirring or mixing equipment is
satisfactory. In other words, no excessive shearing or high speed
blending devices are necessary.
F. PREFERRED COMPOSITIONS
While the inventive process is fully operable to the extent
disclosed, some more specific aspects of the inventive process
produce the best results, and are therefore preferred.
As previously outlined, it has been found that if particular care
is taken in the selection of the two types of surfactants, greatly
improved results are obtained. For example, more favorable results
are obtained when the distillate-soluble surfactant be selected
from those having an HLB value from about 3-10 with the best
results being when the petroleum fraction soluble surfactant has an
HLB dispersion value from about 5-9.
Similarly, when the above-described petroleum fraction-soluble
surfactants are used in conjunction with water-soluble surfactants
having HLB values from about 10-35, superior results are obtained.
This is particularly the case where a non-ionic water-soluble
surfactant having an HLB value of from about 12-15 is used. If an
anionic watersoluble surfactant is used, the preferred HLB range is
30-35. Thus the preferred process conditions of this invention are
those in which at least one petroleum fraction-soluble surfactant
having an HLB value of from 5-9 is used in conjunction with at
least one non-ionic water-soluble surfactant whose HLB value is
from 12-15, with the H/L (hydrophile-lipophile) ratio calculated as
previously described is about 3:1 or less.
In order to disclose this invention in the greatest possible detail
the following illustrative examples are submitted:
Unless specified otherwise, all temperatures are in degrees
fahrenheit (.degree. F.) and all percentages or parts are by
volume. In all instances the volatility characteristics such as
IBP's and EP's are determined by ASTM D-86.
EXAMPLE 1 -
Preparation of an illustrative stable micro emulsion of unleaded
base gasoline and water containing urea.
Procedure A -
A 10 parts by weight portion of urea (7.5 parts by volume) is
dissolved into 68 parts by volume of water and 27 parts by weight
(27.4 parts by volume) of [N-95, a nonylphenol ethoxylated with an
average of 9.5 moles of ethylene oxide (HLB=12.5)] is stirred into
the aqueous urea solution until a homogeneous solution is obtained.
To 75 parts by volume of the vigorously stirred solution
(containing 5.5 parts by vol. of urea, 49.5 parts by vol. water and
20.0 parts by vol. surfactant) is added 391 parts by volume of base
gasoline (whose properties appear below),
Gravity API 59.3
Reid Vapor Pressure 9.2 lbs.
______________________________________ Distillation FIA Analysis
(Fluorescent Indicator Analysis)
______________________________________ IBP -- 71.degree. F. 30.5%
Aromatics EP -- 369.degree. F. 13.0% Olefins 56.5 Saturates
______________________________________
with continued stirring (when stirring is discontinued the mixture
separates into 2 phases. A gasoline-soluble surfactant [N-40, a
nonyl phenol ethoxylated with an average of 4 moles of ethylene
oxide (HLB=9)] is then added in increments until a clear,
transparent microemulsion is obtained. The total gasoline-soluble
surfactant added is 34 parts by volume. The stable, clear, fluid
microemulsion contains 1.1 percent by volume of urea whereas less
than a 0.1% solution of urea in the neat base gasoline can be
obtained using conventional dissolution procedures. The total HLB
of the two surfactants is 11.2 and the H/L ratio is 2.4 to 1.
The same procedure is used to incorporate 1.5 percent by volume of
urea using 14.1 percent by volume water, 4.1 parts by volume of
water-soluble surfactant and 5.4 parts by volume of the
gasoline-soluble surfactant. The HLB of the surfactants is 10.1 and
the H/L ratio is 0.9 to 1.
Procedure B -
A 5.6 parts by volume portion of the gasoline-soluble surfactant of
Procedure A (nonylphenol ethoxylated with 4 moles of ethylene
oxide) is blended into 74.9 parts by volume of the unleaded base
gasoline of Procedure A until a homogenous solution is obtained.
Then a second blend is prepared by dissolving 10 parts by weight of
urea (7.5 parts by volume) into 70 parts by weight of water (70
parts by volume) and adding to the stirred urea solution 20 parts
by weight (20.3 parts by volume) of a water-soluble surfactant
(nonylphenol ethoxylated with 9.5 moles of ethylene oxide). After
the second blend becomes homogenous, 19.5 parts by volume are
blended into the gasoline blend using vigorous agitation. After a
short time a clear microemulsion is obtained, identical in all
respects to the second emulsion prepared in Procedure A.
Procedure C -
A blend of the unleaded base gasoline of Procedure A is obtained by
stirring 78.0 parts by volume of the gasoline and 4.0 parts by
volume of the water soluble ethoxylated nonyl phenol of Procedure A
and 6.8 parts by weight of the gasoline-soluble ethoxylated nonyl
phenol of Procedure A, until a homogenous mixture is obtained. To
the stirred mixture is slowly added 11.2 parts by volume of a 13.8
percent by weight (10.7 percent by volume) aqueous urea solution
previously prepared. After the addition is complete a clear,
microemulsion results. This is identical to the corresponding
microemulsions prepared in Procedures A and B.
EXAMPLES 2-9 -
Preparation of micro-emulsions containing additional water-soluble
additives.
In these examples Procedure A of Example 1 is used to formulate the
micro-emulsions. The unleaded gasoline of Example 1 is used as the
petroleum fraction. Three surfactants designated N-40, N-60 and
N-95 are employed. N-40 is a nonylphenol ethoxylated with 4 moles
of ethylene oxide and is a gasoline soluble surfactant. N-60 is
nonylphenol ethoxylated with 6 moles of ethylene oxide and is also
a gasoline soluble surfactant, while N- 95 is nonylphenol
ethoxylated with an average of 9.5 moles of ethylene oxide and is a
water-soluble surfactant. The concentrations of the water,
gasoline, surfactant and additive components are shown in Table 1,
which also lists the additives and surfactants used and the data
from Example 1.
The figure in parenthesis following each surfactant is the
proportion of the total HLB contributed by each surfactant. For
example, in Table 1, Example 1, N- 95 contributed 7.9 and N-40
contributed 3.3 for a total HLB of 11.2. The H:L ratio in this case
is 7.9/3.3 = 2.4 to 1.
TABLE 1
__________________________________________________________________________
PREPARATION OF MICROEMULSIONS Concentration (parts by volume) of
Components of Emulsion Petroleum Com- Formu- Water-Soluble Addi-
Water-Soluble Petroleum Fraction Fraction bined H:L lation Ex.
Additive tive Surfactant Soluble Surfactant Water (1) HLB Ratio
Procedure
__________________________________________________________________________
1 Urea 1.2 6.9 N-95 (7.9) 4.0 N-40 (3.3) 10.0 77.9 11.2 2.4:1 A,B,C
1.5 3.8 N-95 (4.7) 5.7 N-40 (5.4) 14.2 74.8 10.1 0.9:1 A 2 Ethylene
Glycol 2.0 5.8 N-95 (6.8) 4.9 N-40 (4.1) 10.0 78.3 10.9 1.7:1 A 5.0
5.0 N-95 (7.9) 3.0 N-40 (3.4) 10.0 77.0 11.3 2.4:1 A 5.0 5.0 N-95
(7.9) 2.9 N-40 (3.3) 15.0 72.1 11.2 2.4:1 A 3 Formamide 1.0 4.2
N-95 (5.0) 5.4 N-40 (4.6) 10.0 78.4 10.6 0.0:1 A 1.0 N-60 (1.0) 2.0
4.2 N-95 (5.4) 5.5 N-40 (5.1) 10.0 78.3 10.5 1.1:1 A 5.0 2.5 N-95
(4.7) 4.1 N-40 (5.7) 10.0 78.4 10.4 0.8:1 A 4 Acetamide 4.4 4.2
N-95 (5.1) 6.0 N-40 (5.3) 10.0 75.4 10.4 1:1 A 5 Ethanolamine(mono)
2.0 5.0 N-95 (7.0) 4.0 N-40 (4.0) 10.0 79.0 11.0 1.8:1 A 5.0 6.5
N-95 (9.2) 2.3 N-40 (2.4) 9.9 76.4 11.6 3.8:1 A 6 Ethylene Diamine
2.5 5.5 N-95 (8.5) 2.6 N-40 (3.1) 10.5 78.9 11.6 2.7:1 A 7 Propane
Diamine 5.0 8.5 N-95 (9.9) 1.6 N-40 (1.3) 10.0 74.3 11.8 5.2:1 A
0.6 N-60 (0.6) 8 m-Phenylene Diamine 1.0 4.2 N-95 (5.3) 5.0 N-40
(4.9) 9.9 79.9 10.2 1.1:1 A 9 Formaldehyde 4.2 3.0 N-95 (4.2) 6.0
N-40 (6.0) 6.8 80.0 10.2 0.7:1 A 5.7 4.4 N-95 (6.0) 4.8 N-40 (4.7)
15.2 69.9 10.7 1.3:1 A
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.(1) Gasoline in Examples 1-9
EXAMPLES 10-14 -
Preparation of micro-emulsions of gasoline and water containing
ethylene glycol using other surfactant pairs.
In these examples micro-emulsions of gasoline and water containing
ethylene glycol are prepared using Procedure A of Example 1. Table
2 shows the concentrations of the micro-emulsion components as well
as the total HLB, the individual HLB and the H:L ratio of the
surfactant pairs used. All of the blends are clear fluids of low
viscosity.
EXAMPLES 15-16 -
The preparation of micro emulsions using other petroleum
fractions.
Using the blending technique of Procedure A, microemulsions are
prepared using No. 2 Diesel Fuel and Kerosene as the petroleum
fraction, ethylene glycol as the additive and ethoxylated
nonylphenols as the surfactant pairs. In all instances clear and
stable micro-emulsions are produced. Compositions are shown in
Table 2.
TABLE 2
__________________________________________________________________________
PREPARATION OF MICROEMULSIONS USING VARIOUS SURFACTANT PAIRS
Concentration (parts by volume) of Components of Emulsion Petroleum
Com- Pro- Water-Soluble Addi- Water-Soluble Petroleum Fraction
Fraction bined H:L ce- Ex. Additive tive Surfactant Soluble
Surfactant Water (1) HLB Ratio dure
__________________________________________________________________________
10 Ethylene Glycol 5.0 4.2 NH.sub.4 Lauryl Sulfate(12.7) 6.0 N-40
(5.3) 10.8 74.0 18.0 2.4:1 A 11 Ethylene Glycol 5.0 2.0 Triethanol-
amine Lauryl Sulfate (6.8) 10.0 N-40 (7.2) 10.0 73.0 14.0 0.9:1 A
12 Ethylene Glycol 5.0 5.0 C.sub.21 t-Alkyl- primary Amine Acetate*
6.0 N-40 10.0 74.0 * * A 13 Ethylene Glycol 5.0 3.0 Ethanolamine
Octyl Ortho- phosphate* 9.0 N-40 12.0 71.0 * * A 14 Ethylene Glycol
5.0 6.0 Tween 40 (8.5) 5.0 SPAN 20(3.9) 10.0 74.0 12.4 2.2:1 A 15
Ethylene Glycol 5.0 5.0 N-95 (5.7) 6.0 N-40 (4.9) 10.0 74.0 10.6
1.1:1 A 16 Ethylene Glycol 5.0 4.8 N-95 (5.7) 5.6 N-40 (4.9) 10.0
74.6 10.6 1.1:1 A
__________________________________________________________________________
(1)Diesel fuel (IBP-375.degree.F; EP-600.degree.F) used in Example
14; Kerosene (IBP-330.degree.F; EP-515.degree.F) used in Example
15. All others used Gasoline. * Since the HLB of one of the
surfactants is not known, the combined HLB and H:L ratio are not
shown.
In related work the blending procedure of Examples 15 and 16 is
followed using the same quantities of water, ethylene glycol and
the same surfactant pairs except that No. 1 Diesel Fuel is
substituted for kerosene on a volume-for-volume basis. A
satisfactory micro-emulsion is obtained. Boiling ranges for the
above petroleum fraction are as follows:
Petroleum Fraction IBP EP ______________________________________
No. 1 Furnace Oil 350 525 No. 2 Furnace Oil 375 625 Kerosene 330
500 ______________________________________
EXAMPLES 1, 3, 5, 7 and 18 to 25 -
Establishing criticality of "H":"L" ratio
The compositions in these examples, shown in Table 3, cover H:L
ratios from 0.8 to 1 to 38 to 1. They include five different
water-soluble additives, four different additive pairs and two
petroleum fractions. It will be seen that at an H:L ratio of 7:1,
the clear, fluid compositions of the present invention were not
obtained, while at ratios of from 0.8 to 1 to 5.2 to 1 the desired
fluid, clear microemulsions were obtained. Thus it is evident that
an H:L ratio of less than about 7 is critical to the formation of
the compositions of this invention.
The emulsions were judged by appearance while the type (water in
petroleum or petroleum-in-water) of emulsion was determined by
electrical conductance* to see if the desired satisfactory water in
petroleum fraction type was obtained. As shown in Table 3,
satisfactory water-in-petroleum emulsions can only be achieved when
the combined HLB is below about 12 and the "H" to "L" ratio is at
least 0.8:1 to 5.2:1, preferably from 1:1 to about 4:1.
TABLE 3
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES SHOWING CRITICALITY OF H/L RATIO Concentration (parts by
volume) of Components of Emulsion Water-Soluble Water-Soluble
Petroleum Fraction Petroleum Ex. Additive Additive Surfactant
Soluble Surfactant Water Fraction
__________________________________________________________________________
3 Formamide 5.0 2.5 N-95 (4.7) 4.1 N-40 (5.7) 10 78.4 Gasoline 1
Urea 1.5 3.8 N-95 (4.7) 5.7 N-40 (5.4) 14.2 74.8 Gasoline 18
Ethylene Glycol 2.0 6.0 N-95 (5.8) 7.0 N-20 (3.2) 10.0 75.0 JP-4 19
Ethylene Glycol 2.0 6.0 N-95 (6.3) 6.0 SPAN 80 (2.2) 10.0 76.0 JP-4
20 Ethylene Glycol 2.0 5.0 Tween 80 (7.5) 5.0 SPAN 80 (2.2) 10.0
78.0 JP-4 5 Ethanolamine(mono) 2.0 6.4 N-95 (9.2) 2.3 N-40 (2.4)
9.9 76.4 Gasoline 7 Propane Diamine 5.0 8.5 N-95 (9.9) 1.6 N-40
(1.3) 10.0 74.3 Gasoline 0.6 N-60 (0.6) 17 Ethylene Glycol 2.0 6.0
N-95 (10.4) 1.2 N-40 (1.5) 10.0 80.8 JP-4 21 Formamide 1.14 1.44
Tween 80 (10.8) 0.56 SPAN 80 (1.2) 0.86 96.0 JP-4 22 Formamide 1.14
1.62 Tween 80 (12.1) 0.38 SPAN 80 (0.8) 0.86 96.0 JP-4 23 Ethylene
Glycol 2.5 4.0 Tween 80 (12.1) 1.0 SPAN 80 (0.8) 2.5 90.0 JP-4 24
Ethylene Glycol 2.0 8.0 Tween 80 (12.0) 2.0 SPAN 80 (0.8) 10.0 78.0
JP-4 25 Ethylene Glycol 1.0 1.36 Tween 80(13.65) 0.14 SPAN 80
(0.36) 1.0 96.0 JP-4
__________________________________________________________________________
Combined Emulsion Emulsion Yield Stress Mixing Ex. HLB H:L Ratio
Type Appearance Dynes/cm.sup.2 Procedure
__________________________________________________________________________
3 10.4 0.8:1 w/o Clear liquid 0 (1) 1 10.1 0.9:1 w/o Clear liquid 0
(1) 18 9.0 1.8:1 w/o Clear liquid 0 (1) 19 8.4 2.9:1 w/o Clear
liquid 0 (1) 20 9.7 3.5:1 w/o Clear liquid 0 (1) 5 11.6 3.8:1 w/o
Clear liquid 0 (1) 7 11.8 5.2:1 w/o Clear liquid 0 (1) 17 11.9 7:1
o/w Gel 2000 (2) 21 12.0 9:1 o/w Gel 1900 (2) 22 12.9 15:1 o/w Gel
3550 (2) 23 12.9 15:1 o/w Gel 850 (2) 24 12.8 15:1 o/w Gel 2000 (2)
25 14.0 38:1 o/w Gel 1200 (2)
__________________________________________________________________________
(1) Microemulsion formed with conventional stirring. (2) Gel forms
using mixing procedure of Nixon, et al. Otherwise, no emulsion.
EXAMPLES 26-34 -
Engine tests on the gasoline-in-petroleum micro-emulsions of
Examples 1-9.
Comparisons were made in terms of octane number between the
transparent motor fuel compositions (microemulsions) of Examples 1
to 9 and the unleaded base fuel used as the gasoline stock in
Examples 1 to 9. A Research ASTM D-908-47T (CFR Engine) Method was
used and the testing procedure of ASTM Operating Conditions was 600
rpm and 125.degree. F. intake air temperature. The engine operated
unthrottled with carburetted fuel supply. Controlled operating
parameters were speed, intake air temperature, intake air humidity,
compression ratio, mixture strength and spark timing. Table 4
summarizes the data.
As can be seen from Table 4, increases in octane numbers ranging
from 1.7 to 9.6 units can be obtained over base fuel containing the
same quantities of water.
Table 4
__________________________________________________________________________
Engine Tests on Emulsions from Examples 1 to 9 % by Vol. % by Vol.
% by Vol. Ex. Formulation Water-Soluble Additive in Water in of
Total Research Octane (1) Additive Formulation Formulation
Surfactants Octane Number Increase
__________________________________________________________________________
-- Base Fuel None -- -- -- 93.3 -- -- Base Fuel None -- 10 9.6 94.7
1.4 -- Base Fuel None -- 15 10.5 96.3 3.0 26 Example 1 Urea 1.2
10.0 10.8 96.0 1.3 " " " 1.5 14.0 9.5 99.1 2.8 27 Example 2
Ethylene glycol 2.0 10.0 10.7 98.0 3.3 " " " 5.0 10.0 8.0 98.8 4.1
" " " 5.0 15.0 7.9 103.0 6.7 28 Example 3 Formamide 1.0 10.0 10.6
96.1 1.4 " " " 2.0 10.0 9.7 101.8 7.1 " " " 5.0 10.0 6.6 101.6 6.9
29 Example 4 Acetamide 4.4 10.0 10.2 97.4 2.7 30 Example 5
Ethanolamine 2.0 10.0 9.0 97.9 3.2 " " " 5.0 9.9 8.7 98.9 4.2 31
Example 6 Ethylenediamine 2.5 10.5 8.1 104.3 9.6 32 Example 7
Propanediamine 5.0 10.0 10.7 99.2 4.5 33 Example 8
m-phenylene-diamine 1.0 9.9 9.2 98.5 3.8 34 Example 9 Formaldehyde
4.2 6.8 9.0 96.5 1.8 " " " 5.7 15.2 9.2 99.6 3.3
__________________________________________________________________________
(1) Octane increase above fuel level without water-soluble
additive.
As the preceding specification has demonstrated, several advantages
accrue from the practice of this invention, both in the process and
product aspects.
For example, the inventive process provides a simple, reproducible
method of increasing the quantity of normally poorly soluble
additives that can be incorporated into gasolines and middle
distillates such as diesel fuels, automotive fuels and aviation
fuels. In a more specific vein, the process of this invention
provides an alternative means of upgrading the cetane or octane
numbers of the above distillates using readily available, and
easily handled additives. It also provides a means of incorporating
water in fuels in an extremely stable form without the necessity of
using any equipment other than conventional blending devices.
In its product aspect this invention provides stable and clear
micro-emulsions of distillate fractions and water which incorporate
greater quantities of additives than has been heretofore possible
to solubilize in the neat distillate. In its more specific product
embodiment this invention provides gasoline-additive compositions
that have substantially improved octane numbers compared to the
untreated gasolines.
This invention is also advantageous over the closest known art.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,458,294 (Nixon et al.) who discloses processes of
preparing emulsions of liquid hydrocarbon containing major amounts
of liquid hydrocarbon and as a continuous phase a minor portion of
polar organic liquid including minor amounts of additives. Some
salient differences between the claimed invention and Nixon et al.
are:
a. The applicants always utilize water, Nixon may or may not.
b. We require at least two surfactants, Nixon may use one.
c. Applicants' compositions are water-in-petroleum fraction type
emulsions while the patentees' are petroleum fraction-in-water type
emulsions.
d. Our compositions have viscosities close to that of the petroleum
fraction phase (zero yield value). Nixon's are grease-like
compositions having yield stresses of from 850 dynes/cm.sup.2 (see
composition b, Table VII) to 3550 dynes (composition C, Table
VI).
e. Our blending process is essentially independent of the order of
addinv the components or the type of mixing employed. In contrast,
unless the order of addition and type of mixing, both disclosed in
Nixon, are used, the desired type of product is not obtained.
f. Finally, in applicants' claimed process, unless the critical
ratio of hydrophilic surfactant to lipophilic surfactant (less than
6:1, preferably from about 3:1 to 0.8:1) is utilized, the desired
results are not obtained. That is, above 6:1 leads to the formation
of either very viscous, gel-like emulsions or no emulsions,
depending on the mixing technique.
Finally, this invention is advantageous in that numerous
modifications, substitutions and changes can be made in both its
process and product aspects without departing from the inventive
concept. The metes and bounds of this invention are best determined
by the claims which follow, read in conjunction with the
specification.
* * * * *