U.S. patent number 3,872,012 [Application Number 05/426,791] was granted by the patent office on 1975-03-18 for particulate separator.
This patent grant is currently assigned to McDonnell Douglas Corporation. Invention is credited to Donald L. Endicott.
United States Patent |
3,872,012 |
Endicott |
March 18, 1975 |
PARTICULATE SEPARATOR
Abstract
A separator for removing particulate contamination from a
flowing medium of a different density. The separator incorporates
means such as a venturi for directing and accelerating the
particulate into a predetermined location in the flow and a screen
assembly located downstream of the director. The screen assembly
extends across the location in the flow where particles are
directed to enable the primary flow path of the medium to bypass
the screens if need be. The screen assembly can be comprised of one
or more stages which separate and entrap particles. The screen
assembly may be spring mounted to accommodate variable velocity
flow and may include means for regenerating the screens.
Inventors: |
Endicott; Donald L. (Garden
Grove, CA) |
Assignee: |
McDonnell Douglas Corporation
(Santa Monica, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
23692219 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/426,791 |
Filed: |
December 20, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
210/297; 55/331;
210/316; 55/308; 210/315; 210/354 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B01D
29/90 (20130101); B01D 35/02 (20130101); B01D
46/4281 (20130101); B01D 46/46 (20130101); B01D
29/58 (20130101); B01D 50/002 (20130101); B01D
29/118 (20130101); B01D 2273/14 (20130101); B01D
2201/208 (20130101); B01D 2201/02 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B01D
46/42 (20060101); B01D 50/00 (20060101); B01D
29/00 (20060101); B01D 35/02 (20060101); B01D
35/00 (20060101); B01d 033/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;210/314-316,354,446,448,297,254,409,131,137,433,434,320
;55/307,308,309,320,331,336,337 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Adee; John
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Finch; George W. Jason; W. J.
Royer; D. L.
Government Interests
The invention described herein was made in the performance of work
under NASA Contract No. NAS 3-14375 and is subject to the
provisions of Section 305 of the National Aeronautics and Space Act
of 1958 (72 STAT. 435; 42 U.S.C. 2457).
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A separator for removing particulate contamination from a medium
flowing in a predetermined direction in a conduit, the medium
having a different density than the contamination, the separator
including:
venturi means to accelerate the flowing medium to flow in a
direction different than said predetermined direction so that the
contamination is concentrated in a predetermined downstream area of
the flow and to recover the pressure drop caused by the
acceleration; and
means positioned in said predetermined downstream area of the flow
to entrap and retain said particulate contamination, said last
named means including a first screen, a second screen of finer mesh
than said first screen and downstream therefrom and support means
connected to said screens to support said first and second screens
in said predetermined downstream area of the flow and spaced from
the conduit whereby a primary flow path around said first and
second screens is present, said first and second screens being
connected together at at least one edge thereof and defining an
entrapment zone therebetween in which the particulate is
entrapped.
2. The separator defined in claim 1 wherein said first and second
screens are conical in shape and connected at the circular edges
thereof with said second screen having an enclosed conical angle
which is less than the conical angle of the first so that said
entrapment zone is defined therebetween, the apex of said first
screen and the apex of said second screen being downstream from the
connected edges thereof.
3. The separator defined in claim 2 including regeneration means,
said regeneration means including a vent conduit extending from
through the apex of said second screen to outside the flow conduit,
said vent conduit being connected to said second screen.
4. The separator defined in claim 1 wherein said first and second
screens are connected to and extend inwardly from the flow conduit
and upstream, the connection of said first and second screens being
upstream from their connections to the flow conduit.
5. The separator defined in claim 4 wherein the entrapment zone
defined by said first and second screens extend to the flow
conduit, the separator including means outside the flow conduit in
flow communication with the entrapment zone to provide regeneration
means for the screens.
6. The separator defined in claim 1 wherein said venturi means to
accelerate the flowing medium include a reverse venturi.
7. The separator defined in claim 6 wherein said first and second
screens are conical in shape and connected at the circular edges
thereof with said second screen having an enclosed conical angle
which is less than the conical angle of the first so that said
entrapment zone is defined therebetween, the apex of said first
screen and the apex of said second screen being downstream from the
connected edges thereof.
8. The separator defined in claim 7 including regeneration means,
said regeneration means including a vent conduit extending from
through the apex of said second screen to outside the flow conduit,
said vent conduit being connected to said second screen.
9. The separator defined in claim 6 wherein said first and second
screens are connected to and extend inwardly from the flow conduit
and upstream, the connection of said first and second screens being
upstream from their connections to the flow conduit.
10. The separator defined in claim 9 wherein the entrapment zone
defined by said first and second screens extend to the flow
conduit, the separator including means outside the flow conduit in
flow communication with the entrapment zone to provide regeneration
means for the screens.
11. A separator for removing particulate contamination from a
medium flowing in a predetermined direction in a conduit, the
medium having a different density than the contamination, the
separator including:
venturi means to accelerate the flowing medium to flow in a
direction different than said predetermined direction so that the
contamination is concentrated in a predetermined downstream area of
the flow;
means positioned in said predetermined downstream area of the flow
to entrap and retain said particulate contamination, said last
named means including a first screen and a second screen of finer
mesh than said first screen and downstream therefrom, said first
and second screens being conical in shape and being connected at
the circular edges thereof with said second screen having an
enclosed conical angle which is less than the conical angle of the
first so that an entrapment zone is defined therebetween in which
the particulate is entrapped, the apex of said first screen and the
apex of said second screen being normally downstream from the
connected edges thereof; and
spring arms which support said first and second screens spaced from
the conduit so that said screens are moved downstream in response
to increased flow velocity of the medium and are returned upstream
in response to decreased flow velocity of the medium.
12. The separator defined in claim 11 including regeneration means
connected to the entrapment zone, said regeneration means
including:
a vent conduit extending from through the apex of said second
screen to outside the flow conduit; and
seal means connecting said vent conduit to said second screen and
allowing relative upstream and downstream movement
therebetween.
13. The separator defined in claim 12 including regeneration means
connected to the entrapment zone, said regeneration means
including:
a vent conduit extending from through the apex of said second
screen to outside the flow conduit; and
seal means connecting said vent conduit to said second screen and
allowing relative upstream and downstream movement
therebetween.
14. The separator defined in claim 11 wherein said venturi means
include a reverse venturi.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Precision components used in fluid transfer systems have failure
modes in service directly due to damage received from particles
contaminating the fluid in the transfer system. Shutoff valves,
check valves and regulators are especially sensitive to this type
of damage. When prior art filters are used in such fluid transfer
systems the particulate damage can be prevented. However, the
potential damage due to high flow restrictions inherent in a
plugged filter introduces another potential system failure and
therefore the use of conventional filters is restricted to an
absolute minimum number in normal service.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present particulate separator is suitable to solve the problems
mentioned in the above background, so long as the particulate has a
density different than that of the flowing medium. The separator
operates on a flow of medium by deflecting the particles to a
predetermined location in the flow stream and then removing them
from the stream by entrapping them between one or more pairs of
screens where the upstream screen has a coarser mesh than the
downstream screen. Since the screens need not extend completely
across the flow path and since either a venturi or reverse venturi
can be designed for almost complete pressure recovery, the present
separator operates with an inherent low pressure drop. Under
changing conditions of particulate contamination concentration, the
separator will never plug up. However, the particulate retention
capability will change under varying contamination concentration
levels. Also, since the screens provide a high degree of
particulate retention, the device will operate under varying G load
conditions including a zero G condition.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide means
for separating particulate from a flowing medium wherein the
particulate has a density which differs from that of the flowing
medium.
Another object is to provide a separator which when used properly
is highly effective and economical.
Another object is to provide a separator whose inlet can be quickly
and economically changed so that the separator separates either
lighter or heavier particles than the medium flowing through the
separator.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention
will become apparent after considering the following detailed
specification which covers preferred embodiments thereof in
conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a particulate separator
constructed according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the separator of FIG. 1 with
modified particulate entrapment means;
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a separator similar to that
shown in FIGS. 1 and 2;
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of a separator for separating
light particles; and
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a separator similar to FIG. 4
but having particle entrapment and retention means for capturing
heavy particles.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE SHOWN EMBODIMENTS
Referring to the drawings more particularly by reference numbers,
number 10 in FIG. 1 refers to a dynamic separator constructed
according to the present invention. The separator 10 is especially
useful in the flow lines 11 of gas or fluid systems where the
separator performs the function of a prefilter to remove quantities
of contamination particles upstream of the conventional filters to
increase the service life of a conventional filter. The separator
10 includes means which accelerate the medium so that the
particulate matter having a different density than the flowing
medium, moves to predetermined areas in the flow stream. In the
separator 10 of FIG. 1 these means include a venturi 12 which
causes heavy particulate to flow in the direction shown by the
arrows 14 so they concentrate in the center of the flow stream.
Light particles are concentrated in a concentric pattern about the
outermost portions of the flow stream. Particle entrapment means 16
are shown placed in the trajectory of the heavy particles to trap
them and to prevent them from traveling further with the medium
flowing through the separator 10.
The particle retention means 16 as shown includes a conical coarse
screen 18 which is connected about its edge 19 to a conical fine
screen 20. A space 22 defined between the two screens 18 and 20
forms an entrapment volume for retention of the contamination
particles. Since the first screen 18 is of a coarse mesh, particles
flow through it due to their momentum and that of the flowing
medium. Once through the coarse screen 18, the particles are
stopped by the fine mesh screen 20 and are trapped between the two
screens in the entrapment zone 22. The particles cannot escape from
the entrapment zone 22 because there is no way of introducing the
required momentum to the particles in a reverse direction. Even
under conditions of reverse flow of the fine mesh of the screen 20
introduces a protective pressure drop which prevents the
establishment of a corresponding force which could push the
particles back through the coarse screen 18, hence, positive
entrapment in the entrapment zone 22 is obtained.
When a large quantity of particles have been captured in the
entrapment zone 22, the means 16 can clog and effective filtering
no longer takes place. However, the particle entrapment means 16 is
supported in the flow by a plurality of spaced arms 24 or other
suitable means which provide an essentially unrestricted path for
the flow of medium. The primary flow path of the medium whether the
particle retention means 16 is saturated with particles or not, is
that shown by arrows 26. This means that no matter how clogged the
particle entrapment means 16 may become, the flow through the
separator 10 is not significantly restricted so that no
catastrophic failure such as the clogging of the entire flow line
11 is possible.
The separator 10 as shown in FIG. 1 is especially suitable when a
known amount of contaminate is possible and it is desired to make
the separator as economical and as simple as possible. Such
applications include fuel and a hydraulic fluid filtering in single
use spacecraft or in applications where it is easier to replace or
clean the separator than to provide regeneration means.
Such regeneration means 28 are shown in FIG. 2 added to the
particle entrapment means 16a of the separator 10. The version of
the separator 10 shown in FIG. 2 is especially useful in systems
which have relatively constant flow velocities. The regeneration
means 28 include a vent line 30 connected at the apex 32 of the
fine screen 20. The vent 30 is connected to a secondary paticulate
disposal area 34. The regeneration function can be accomplished
continuously in the secondary disposal area by a continuous bleed
off flow or on an intermittent basis. When it is desired to
regenerate the separator 10 on an intermittent basis, a shutoff
valve 36 can be incorporated into the vent line 30. The arrangement
as shown in FIG. 2 has as its primary usefulness prefilter service
on coolant inlet lines such as those used to feed ocean water
coolant into commercial power and manufacturing installations in
which case the particle disposal area can be the ocean.
A further separator configuration is shown by the separator 10' in
FIG. 3. The separator 10' is used when it is desired to have
efficient operation over a greater range of flow velocities than
would be possible with the separator 10 of FIGS. 1 and 2. In the
separator 10', the particulate entrapment means 16b is mounted on a
spring system such as, for example, the spring arms 38. The spring
arms 38 permit the particle entrapment means 16b to move away from
the venturi 12 under conditions of high flow and then return to a
position closer to the venturi 12 under conditions of low fluid
flow. The position of the entrapment is controlled by the force
generated by the fluid dynamics on the screens 18 and 20 directly
so no secondary force/position control of the means 16 is
necessary. The spring arms 38 permit the screens 18 and 20 to
operate with a minimum standoff distance from the venturi 12 under
low flow conditions when the maximum turning angle (.phi.) of the
particles with respect to the flow is required for efficient
separation while still allowing efficient operation under high flow
velocity conditions by moving to the extended position shown in
dashed lines thereby increasing the area of primary flow and
preventing the introduction of a high pressure drop in the flowing
medium. Since the required particulate turning angle .phi.
decreases with increases in particulate velocity, separator 10'
permits operation with low pressure drop and high efficiency over a
broad range of flow velocities. The separator 10' is especially
applicable to applications such as a particulate separator for use
in automobile mufflers of the catalytic type which are presently
being proposed to enable internal combustion engines to meet air
pollution control requirements. The use of the separator 10' to
remove the particles can extend the life of the catalytic elements
thereby introducing a significant cost savings.
The means 16b of FIG. 3 can also include regeneration means 28' as
shown by the retention means 16c of FIG. 4. The regeneration means
28' are similar to those shown in FIG. 2 and include a vent 30' and
an optional shutoff valve 36' which can be used when regeneration
is desired on an intermittent basis rather than continuously.
Regeneration means 28' also include a seal 40 which slides along a
portion of the vent 30' to allow the particle retention means 16c
to move between the retracted and extended positions in response to
flow velocity changes. A frustroconical section 42 is mounted on
the end of the vent 30' to prevent the seal 40 from decoupling from
the vent 30'. The retention means 16c shown in FIG. 4 when a
venturi is used as the particle acceleration means, are useful for
all applications where self-cleaning or regeneration is required
for service under variable flow velocity conditions. This condition
typically occurs in some automotive smog control devices and
various nuclear fluid systems.
It should be understood that the screens 18 and 20 will have a mesh
size and difference which is dependent upon the particulate matter
expected to be entrapped. For example, when it is desired to
capture and retain particles in the 35 to 150 micron sizes, screen
20 would have a mesh of openings about 35 microns while the
upstream screen 18 would have a mesh of 75 microns. This would
provide very fine filtering in such applications as fuel and
hydraulic flow particulate problems while much larger screens and
series ganged separators of decreasing size can be provided for
such applications as ocean water filtering for coolant inlet lines
to commercial power and manufacturing installations.
Although in FIGS. 1 through 3 a simple venturi arrangement 12 is
shown to accelerate the medium and particles and provide the
inertia for the separation operation, other means for concentrating
the contamination particles in a portion of the stream and
recovering the pressure can be used. For example, in FIG. 4 a body
44 is supported by legs 46 in the center of the stream to form a
reverse venturi which causes light particles to concentrate in the
center of the stream for collection by means 16c. If heavy
particles are present they are concentrated in a concentric pattern
adjacent the side wall 48 of the flow tube 11. Particle entrapment
means 50 such as those shown in the separator 51 of FIG. 5 can be
provided concentrically about the separator 51 near the side wall
48. The means 50 also include a ring shaped coarse screen 52 on the
upstream side and a connected ring shaped finer screen 54 on the
downstream side to form an entrapment zone 56 therebetween. Since
the particle entrapment means 50 are in intimate contact with the
side wall 48 of the separator, regeneration means can be provided
by simple ring manifold 58 which has openings 60 into the
entrapment zone 56. Flow through the manifold can be continuous or
controlled by a shutoff valve 62 for intermittent regeneration.
Thus there has been shown and described novel particulate separator
means which fulfill all of the objects and advantages sought
therefor. Many changes, modifications, variations and other uses
and applications of the subject invention will, however, become
apparent to those skilled in the art after considering this
specification together with the accompanying drawings. All such
changes, modifications, variations and other uses and applications
which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention are
deemed to be covered by the invention which is limited only by the
claims which follow.
* * * * *