U.S. patent number 3,871,649 [Application Number 04/863,181] was granted by the patent office on 1975-03-18 for matched set of golf clubs.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The Dunlop Company Limited. Invention is credited to John Arthur Kilshaw.
United States Patent |
3,871,649 |
Kilshaw |
March 18, 1975 |
MATCHED SET OF GOLF CLUBS
Abstract
A matched set of golf clubs, of which each club comprises a
shaft and a club head carried thereon, wherein the flexural
rigidity of the shaft of any wood or iron of the set is not more
than that of any longer wood or iron, respectively, of the set.
Thus the club shafts became more flexible per unit length as they
get shorter, this being opposite to conventional trends. This
reversed trend has been found to be very advantageous particularly
in that matched sets of clubs can be provided having matched
moments of inertia and matched frequency of vibration. Thus, all
the clubs of the set will have a very similar feel in use.
Inventors: |
Kilshaw; John Arthur
(Netherton, EN) |
Assignee: |
The Dunlop Company Limited
(London, EN)
|
Family
ID: |
10444018 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/863,181 |
Filed: |
October 2, 1969 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4, 1968 [GB] |
|
|
47175/68 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
473/289;
29/428 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A63B
53/00 (20130101); A63B 53/005 (20200801); A63B
60/10 (20151001); A63B 53/12 (20130101); A63B
60/08 (20151001); A63B 60/0081 (20200801); A63B
60/06 (20151001); Y10T 29/49826 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
A63B
53/00 (20060101); A63b 053/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;73/67.2,65
;273/77R,77A,8R,8B,80.2,81R,162,167R ;29/428 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,288 |
|
Feb 1913 |
|
GB |
|
256,049 |
|
Aug 1926 |
|
GB |
|
465,414 |
|
May 1937 |
|
GB |
|
470,178 |
|
Aug 1937 |
|
GB |
|
139,858 |
|
Mar 1960 |
|
SU |
|
Primary Examiner: Apley; Richard J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Stevens, Davis, Miller &
Mosher
Claims
We claim:
1. A matched set of golf clubs having woods and irons, each club of
said set comprising a shaft having a club head on one end and a
grip on the opposite end and said set comprising a plurality of
woods of decreasing shaft length and increasing loft and a
plurality of irons of decreasing shaft length and increasing loft,
the improvement comprising having the flexural rigidity of the
shaft of any wood in the set not greater than that of the shaft of
any longer wood in the set and having the flexural rigidity of the
shaft of any iron in said set not greater than that of the shaft of
any longer iron in said set.
2. A matched set of golf clubs according to claim 1, in which the
values for flexural rigidity of the shafts of both the woods and
the irons decrease progressively from the longest to the shortest
shaft of the woods and of the irons.
3. A matched set of golf clubs according to claim 2, in which the
shafts are of stepped metal tube and the decrease in flexural
rigity from one shaft to another is obtained by use of different
wall thicknesses for the various steps of each shaft.
4. A matched set of golf clubs according to claim 2, in which the
shafts are of stepped metal tube and the decrease in flexural
rigidity from one shaft to another is obtained by an increase in
the length of the step most distant from the grip end of the
clubs.
5. A matched set of golf clubs according to claim 4, in which the
length of the various steps between the two terminal steps of the
tube is the same for all the irons of the set.
6. A matched set of golf clubs according to claim 4, in which the
length of the various steps between the two terminal steps of the
tube is the same for all the woods of the set.
7. A matched set of golf clubs according to claim 1, in which at
least all the woods have a common frequency of vibration.
8. A matched set of golf clubs according to claim 7, in which all
the irons have a common frequency of vibration.
9. A matched set of golf clubs according to claim 1, in which the
clubs are matched with respect to their moments of inertia, said
moments of inertia for each club being measured about a point in
the shaft which is a fixed distance from the grip, said distance
being the same for each club.
Description
This invention relates to matched sets of golf clubs.
It is the common experience of golfers that for a set of golf clubs
to be really satisfactory not only must each individual club suit
them as far as its length, weight and flexibility is concerned, but
that the set as a whole should "feel right", that is the clubs of
the set should have common characteristics which give the golfer
the same feel when making strokes with the various clubs of the
set. Reference in this Specification to "a set of clubs" refers to
the woods and the irons, but does not include the putter.
At present the generally accepted method of matching golf clubs
into a set is by what is known as the "swing weight" method in
which the moment of weight of the clubs is measured with respect to
points on the various types of clubs all at the same distance from
the grip end of the club. Although this method is in common use, it
is not really satisfactory in producing matched sets of clubs. A
greatly improved method is one in which the matched clubs all have
the same moment of inertia about points in their shafts which are
the same distance from the grips of the clubs.
Such a method and apparatus is described in the assignee's
co-pending U.S. Pat. No. 3,703,824 issued Nov. 28, 1972.
Whichever method of matching clubs is adopted, however, it has been
common practice for the various types of clubs in the set to show a
gradation of flexural rigidity throughout the set, the rigidity
increasing with descreasing length of club. Thus, the rigidity of
the shaft of a conventional No. 1 wood, whose length is usually 44
inches, is less than that of the shaft of the No. 3 wood whose
length is usually 43 inches. Similarly, the rigidity of shaft of
conventional irons increases from the No. 2 iron whose shaft is
usually 39 inches long to the No. 9 iron whose shaft is usually
only 351/2 inches long. Hitherto, this gradation of rigidity has
been thought essential. However, I have now found that this is not
so and that considerable advantages can be obtained if gradation of
rigidity throughout the set is the converse of the common practice.
Alternatively, the flexural rigidity can be the same for all the
clubs or at least have a common value for all the irons and a
common value (which can be different from the common value for the
irons) for all the woods.
Accordingly, in one aspect the present invention provides a matched
set of golf clubs in which the flexural rigidity of the shafts of
the clubs is such that the flexural rigidity of the shaft of the
shortest iron or wood is not more than that of the longest iron or
wood respectively.
Where there is a gradation in rigidity it is preferably a
progressive decrease throughout the woods from the longest to the
shortest or a progressive decrease throughout the irons from the
longest to the shortest, though two or more of the woods or irons
can, if desired, have the same rigidity, especially if they are
adjacent clubs in the set.
It has further been found that the clubs of this invention are of
particular value where the clubs are made so that at least all the
woods have a common frequency of vibration, and where the irons
also have a common frequency of vibration which generally will be
different from, but may be the same as, the common frequency of the
woods.
The gradation of rigidity of this invention can be achieved in
various ways. In one way, the stepped pattern of a conventional set
of shafts is retained (i.e. the same lengths and external diameters
of the various steps and sections are used), but different wall
thicknesses of tube are used such that the shafts in the set get
progressively lighter as they get shorter, instead of remaining
constant in weight or getting progressively heavier, as is the
usual case. In this way a progressive reduction in wall thickness
can be specified such that the flexural rigidity is either
maintained at a fixed value or is progressively reduced.
A second way of obtaining the necessary gradation in rigidity is to
use tubes of the same wall thicknesses as for a conventional set of
shafts, but to choose the length and position of the various steps
such that the necessary regidity is obtained. In general, this
means that the first section or lowermost step on the shaft gets
longer and (preferably) the last section or uppermost step (which
bears the golf grip) gets shorter as the shafts get progressively
shorter in the set whilst the length of the intermediate steps
remain constant. Because the lowermost section is of lesser
diameter than that of the other sections, the result is to decrease
the overall rigidity of the shaft. A third way of obtaining the
necessary gradation in rigidity, which applies only to roll-tapered
unstepped shafts, is to taper the shafts at a substantially
constant rate but in such a way that the uppermost generally
parallel section of each shaft (which bears the golf grip) gets
shorter as the shafts progressively shorten through the set.. Again
this means that as the shafts get shorter, a greater proportion of
the shaft length has a lower effective diameter which leads to a
reduction in rigidity.
In the set of clubs described below as exemplification of the
present invention the gradation in rigidity is obtained by a
preferred form of the second of the methods described above, in
which the lowermost step (that is, the step nearest to the head end
of the shaft) increases in length with decreasing length of club
shaft, but the lengths of the other steps remains constant.
Sets of clubs of overall increased or decreased rigidity can be
obtained either by using a lowermost step of decreased or increased
length respectively or by using a tube of increased or decreased
diameter respectively at the grip end.
The invention is illustrated by the following Examples with
reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
FIG. I is a diagrammatic representation of the shaft of the woods
of all three Examples; and
FIGS. II, III and IV are respectively diagrammatic representations
of the shafts used respectively for the "medium" clubs of Example
1, the "whippy" clubs of Example 2 and the "stiff" clubs of Example
3.
FIG. V illustrates a conventional Golf Club having a stepped shaft
with increasing thickness of the wall, FIG. 5A having the thinnest
wall and FIG. 5C the thickess wall.
FIG. VI illustrates the shafts for a wood set in its completed
form;
FIG. VII illustrates representative examples of the shafts for a
set of irons in their completed form.
EXAMPLE 1
This Example describes a matched set of golf clubs consisting of
four woods and 10 irons, in which all the clubs have the same
moment of inertia the woods have a common frequency of vibration
and the irons have common frequency of vibration though different
from that of the woods.
Table 1 below shows the moment of inertia, head weight, flexural
rigidity and frequency of vibration of the clubs of this Example
compared with the values for a conventional set of clubs. The
lengths of the various types of clubs are the same in the two
sets.
TABLE 1
__________________________________________________________________________
Moment of Inertia Head Weight Flexural Rigidity Frequency of
(gcm.sup.2 .times. 10.sup.7) (g.) (gcm.sup.2 .times. 10.sup.7)
Vibration (cpm) Nominal len- Conven- Inven- Conven- Inven- Conven-
Inven- Conven- Inven- gth of shaft tional tion tional tion tional
tion tional tion (inches)
__________________________________________________________________________
WOODS 1 44 29.5 27.6 200 190 4.8 4.9 274 286 2 431/2 29.3 27.6 207
195 4.8 4.85 279 286 3 43 29.1 27.6 214 201 4.9 4.8 282 286 4 421/2
28.9 27.6 221 207 4.9 4.75 287 286 IRONS 2 39 28.0 27.6 254 248 4.8
5.8 305 333 3 381/2 27.8 27.6 261 256 4.9 5.7 313 333 4 38 27.6
27.6 268 264 5.0 5.6 318 333 5 371/2 27.8 27.6 275 272 5.0 5.5 323
333 6 37 27.4 27.6 282 280 5.1 5.4 326 333 7 361/2 27.5 27.6 289
289 5.1 5.3 335 333 8 36 27.4 27.6 296 298 5.2 5.2 339 333 9 351/2
27.3 27.6 303 308 5.4 5.1 349 333 10 351/2 28.5 27.6 320 308 5.4
5.1 347 333 SAND 351/2 30.0 27.6 345 308 5.5 5.1 343 333
__________________________________________________________________________
In obtaining the data given in Table 1 above the flexural rigidity
of the shafts was measured as follows. The top 7.7 inches of the
club shaft without its club head was firmly clamped in a vice and
the distance L of the free length of shaft from the vice to the
other end of the shaft was measured. A known weight W was suspended
from the free end of the shaft and the resulting static downward
deflection d of the free end was measured. The flexural rigidity of
the shaft was then obtained from the following equation:-
Flexural rigidity (g.cm.sup.2 .times. 10.sup.7) = W. L.sup.3
/3d
where W is the suspended weight (grams)
L is the free length of shaft (centimetres)
d is the deflection of free end of shaft (centimetres)
Arbitrary lengths of the golf shaft other than 7.7 inches can be
clamped to determine flexural rigidity and this will give slightly
different values from those quoted. However, the desired gradation
in rigidity will still be maintained.
The clubs of this Example had shafts, which each weighed between
41/8 and 45/8 ounces, were of hardened steel tube which has been
formed into a "stepped" shape. The dimensions of the various steps
are given in the Tables below.
The values for the frequency of vibration were obtained from the
standard equation for the oscillation of a rod clamped at one end
thereof and having a mass fixed at the other: ##SPC1##
where
f = frequency of vibration (cycles/minutes)
Yak.sup.2 = flexural rigidity of the club shaft (g.cm.sup.2)
L = free length of shaft (cm.)
M = mass of club head (grams)
m = mass of free length of shaft (grams)
G = gravitational constant
The frequency of vibration of the clubs can be obtained by direct
measurement as follows. The top end of the shaft of the complete
club is gripped firmly in a vice and the head end is "plucked" so
that the free portion of the club vibrates. The number of
vibrations per minute can then be counted, for example by an
electric counting device. It is found that the values for frequency
of vibration obtained experimentally agree with the calculated
values within a margin of .-+. 5%, usually 3-5%.
The set of clubs of this Example were tested in play by 12
experienced golfers all of whom found them to be well matched as to
feel and noticeably superior to the set of conventional clubs.
EXAMPLE 2
This Example relates to a set of clubs having a more whippy feel
than those of Example 1.
A set of matched golf clubs was made in which the various types of
clubs had the moment of inertia and head weights equal to those of
the various types of clubs of the set of this invention of Example
1 but with different dimensions for the various steps of the
shafts. The dimensions are given in the Tables below. The flexural
rigidity of the shaft of each club was 0.25 g.cm.sup.2 .times.
10.sup.7 less than the values for the clubs of Example 1.
From playing tests with the clubs of this Example it was found that
all the clubs were more whippy than the corresponding clubs of
Example 1 and that the set as a whole was better matched than the
conventional set.
EXAMPLE 3
This Example relates to a set of clubs having a stiffer feel than
those of Example 1.
A set of matched golf clubs was made in which the various types of
clubs had the moment of inertia and head weights equal to those of
the various types of clubs of the set of this invention of Example
1, but with different dimensions for the various steps of the
shafts. The dimensions are given in the Tables below. The flexural
rigidity of the shaft of each club was 0.25 g.cm.sup.2 .times.
10.sup.7 more than the values for the clubs of Example 1.
From playing tests with the clubs of this Example it was found that
all the clubs were stiffer than the corresponding clubs of Example
1 and that the set as a whole was better matched than the
conventional set.
The external diameter and length of the various steps of the clubs
of Examples 1, 2 and 3 are given below in Tables 2-5, of which
Tables 2 and 3 relate to the woods whose shaft is shown in FIG. I
and Tables 4 and 5 to the irons whose shafts, medium, whippy or
stiff are shown respectively in FIGS. II, III and IV.
The dimensions given in Table 2 relate to the medium shafts used
for the woods of Example 1, the whippy shafts used in Example 2 and
the stiff shafts used in Example 3. It will be seen from Table 2
that the difference between the three types of shaft lies in the
different lengths of Steps A and N, the lengths of the other steps
being unchanged whether for medium, whippy or stiff shafts. The
various lengths of Step A are shown in Table 3.
It should be noted that in the shafts used for these woods the
external diameter of the last eight inches at the end of Step A
tapers uniformly from 0.335 to 0.277 inch. This taper is to
facilitate the attachment of the shaft to the head of the club.
TABLE 2 - WOODS ______________________________________ Step
External Diameter Length of Step (inch) (inches)
______________________________________ A 0.335 (variable see Table
3) B 0.345 4 C 0.360 2 D 0.375 11/2 E 0.390 11/2 F 0.405 1 G 0.425
1 H 0.455 7/8 I 0.485 7/8 J 0.515 5/8 K 0.545 5/8 L 0.575 1/2 M
0.600 1/2 N 0.620 depends upon length of Step A
______________________________________
TABLE 3 - WOODS ______________________________________ Length of
Step A (inches) Total Length of shaft (inches) Stiff Medium Whippy
shaft shaft shaft ______________________________________ 44 12.25
13.75 15.25 43.5 12.5 14 15.5 43 12.75 14.25 15.75 42.5 13 14.5 16
______________________________________
FIGS. II, III and IV show respectively the shafts used for the
irons of Examples 1, 2 and 3. The dimensions of the steps of each
of those shafts are given in Tables 4 and 5 below.
It should be noted that in the shafts used for these irons the
external diameter of the last two inches at the end of Step 1
tapers uniformly from 0.370 to 0.355 inch to facilitate attachment
of the shaft to the club head.
TABLE 4 - IRONS
__________________________________________________________________________
Step External Diameter Length of step (inches) (inch)
__________________________________________________________________________
Stiff Medium Whippy Stiff Medium Whippy
__________________________________________________________________________
1 0.370 0.370 0.370 (variable see Table 5) 2 0.380 0.380 0.370 13/4
13/4 13/4 3 0.387 0.387 0.387 11/4 11/4 11/4 4 0.395 0.395 0.395 1
1 1 5 0.405 0.405 0.405 5/8 5/8 5/8 6 0.415 0.415 0.415 5/8 5/8 5/8
7 0.430 0.430 0.430 1/2 1/2 1/2 8 0.450 0.450 0.450 1/2 1/2 1/2 9
0.470 0.470 0.460 1/2 1/2 1/2 10 0.480 0.480 0.470 1/2 1/2 1/2 11
0.490 0.490 0.480 1/2 1/2 depends upon length of step 1. 12 0.505
0.500 -- 1/2 depends -- upon length of step 1. 13 0.520 -- --
depends -- -- upon length of step 1.
__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 5 - IRONS ______________________________________ Total length
Length of of shaft (inches) step 1 (inches)
______________________________________ 39 61/4 381/2 7 5/16 38 83/8
371/2 9 7/16 37 101/2 361/2 11 9/16 36 123/8 351/2 13 11/16
______________________________________
In producing the finished clubs of the Examples the thinner end of
each shaft was fixed in a reamed cavity in the head. The other end
of the shaft was trimmed, if necessary, to obtain the desired
length of club and the grip fitted. The total length of shaft
referred to above is the length of the shaft before any such
trimming, and is the length of the shaft when the various tests to
ascertain frequency of vibration and moment of inertia are
made.
* * * * *