U.S. patent number 3,870,648 [Application Number 05/106,549] was granted by the patent office on 1975-03-11 for polyelectrolytes as detergent builders.
This patent grant is currently assigned to GAF Corporation. Invention is credited to Richard Anthony Grifo.
United States Patent |
3,870,648 |
Grifo |
March 11, 1975 |
POLYELECTROLYTES AS DETERGENT BUILDERS
Abstract
A non-polluting builder composition for cleansing purposes is
described consisting of composite of a polyelectrolyte and the
alkali metal salt of a weak acid. Such builder compositions can
replace the phosphorous and nitrogen-containing builders previously
used in cleansing and laundry detergents with regard to
effectiveness in hard water at one-tenth and one-fifth the
concentrations of such previously used builders. In hard water,
such composite builders prevent the precipitation of insoluble
calcium soaps which occurs in household and laundry detergent
compositions utilizing either component alone as a builder. The
previously noted stabilizing effects of the polyelectrolyte with
regard to enzymes and bleaches is not decreased by the added
components of these composite builders.
Inventors: |
Grifo; Richard Anthony (Easton,
PA) |
Assignee: |
GAF Corporation (New York,
NY)
|
Family
ID: |
22312015 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/106,549 |
Filed: |
January 14, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
510/361; 510/345;
510/353; 510/356; 510/357; 510/476; 510/347 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C11D
3/08 (20130101); C11D 3/046 (20130101); C11D
3/3761 (20130101); C11D 3/10 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C11D
3/00 (20060101); C11D 3/37 (20060101); C11D
3/02 (20060101); C11d 003/04 (); C11d 011/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;252/135,137,89,DIG.15 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Weinblatt; Mayer
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kehm; Walter C. Leavitt; Samson B.
Blauvelt; James N.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A process for producing an ecologically desirable detergent
composition suitable for washing textiles, comprising admixing, as
essential ingredients, a detergent selected from the group
consisting of nonionic, anionic, cationic and amphoteric
detergents, together with a composite builder, as sole builder,
consisting of a member selected from the group consisting of
polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic anhydride, salts and hydrolysis
products thereof having a K value of from 10 to about 200 and at
least one alkali metal salt selected from the group consisting of
alkali metal carbonates, alkali metal silicates, and alkali metal
borates wherein the ratio of polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic
anhydride group member to alkali metal salt group member is, in
parts by weight, from 1:100 to 1:2, the ratio of the detergent to
the composite builder being, in parts by weight, 8:1 to 1:100,
whereby to produce an ecologically desirable detergent composition
at least substantially devoid of non-polluting nitrogen and
phosphorus.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said alkali metal salt is
sodium carbonate.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to detergent compositions useful for
household and laundry service and particularly relates to builders
for such compositions that are devoid of pollutant or toxic
potentials. The term "builders" refers to the class of compounds
and compositions which improve detergency levels of synthetic
detergents and soaps. By utilizing builders, it is possible to
prepare detergent compositions having superior detergency as
measured by removal of dirt and superior qualities with regard to
the redeposition of the dirt that is loosened during the washing
process. Additionally, by utilizing builders, it is possible to
reduce the final cost of the detergent compositions.
The exact mechanism by which builders achieve their function in
detergent compositions is not well understood. Consequently, it is
not possible to predict classes of compounds or compositions which
would tend to function as builders. Presently, two criteria are
used for evaluating the effectiveness of builder compositions;
detergency and anti-soild redeposition. Convenient objective means
for measuring and evaluating these qualities will be described
below.
In the recent past, the most commonly used builder materials have
been the water-soluble inorganic alakaline phosphates and
polyphosphates. At present, their usage is being interdicted. The
phosphate ion is a nutrient for algae which are a prime cause of
eutrification of our lakes and waterways. The phosphate ion from
laundry and household use of detergents appears to enhance the
growth of algae and the sudden overgrowth of algae interferes with
the ecological balance within the lakes and waterways into which
such waste waters are discharged.
A recently commercialized builder material, nitrolotriacetic acid,
had been proposed as a replacement for phosphate builders such as
the polyphosphates. However, recent research has indicated the
possibility of birth defects in test animals after exposure to
combinations of nitrilotriacetic acid, which is a
nitrogen-containing chelating agent, with certain toxic salts. It
appears that this builder molecule in some manner permits the
transport of toxic cadmium and mercury through tissue membranes.
Consequently, this material is less than desirable for utilization
in and around the normal household and for discharge into our
environmental waters.
It is consequently an object of this invention to furnish a builder
which is at least as effective as phosphates for use in detergent
compositions.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a builder which
is non-toxic and contains neither nitrogen phosphorus as readily
available nutrient elements for the overgrowth of algae or other
undesirable aquatic plants.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a builder which
can be utilized for the preparation of ecologically balanced
detergent products.
The above objects are achieved by the utilization in cleansing
compositions, comprising detergents and builders, a builder that is
a composite of certain polyelectrolytes and alkaline-reacting salts
of alkali metals with weak acids. The polyelectrolyte component of
the composite builders of this invention are the copolymer of lower
alkyl vinyl ethers with maleic acid or its anhydride. Preferred is
PVM/MA of Polyvinyl methyl ether/Maleic Anhydride and its
hydrolyzed product. The anhydride copolymer has the configuration
of: ##SPC1##
where R is lower alkyl up to 6 carbon atoms, x is greater than 10,
indicating polymers of molecule weight ranging from about 1,500 to
in excess of 2,500,000. The anhydride copolymer is also useful in
its hydrolyzed form and its salts. The hydrolyzed form, polyvinyl
methyl ether/maleic acid has the following configuration:
##SPC2##
where R and x are as indicated above.
Viscosity measurements are commonly used as an indication of the
average molecular weight of the polymeric composition. The K value
(Fikentscher) of any particular mixture of polymers is calculated
from viscosity data and is useful as an indication of the average
molecular weight of such mixtures. Its determination is fully
described in MODERN PLASTICS 23 No. 3, 157-161, 212, 214, 216, 218,
(1945) and is defined as 1,000 times k in the empirical relative
viscosity equation:
(log 10 .eta.rel = 75k.sup.2)/(I + 1.5kC ) + k
wherein C is the concentration in grams per hundred cc. of polymer
solution and .eta. rel is the ratio of the viscosity of the
solution to that of pure solvent. The K values are reported as
1,000 times the calculated viscosity coefficient in order to avoid
the use of decimals. The preferred interpolymers employed in the
present invention have k values of from about 10 to about 200.
K values and specific viscosities (.eta. sp) are interconvertible
and are related through relative viscosity (.eta.0 rel). Thus, when
viscosity measurements are taken on solutions which have a
concentration of 1.00 gram of polymer per deciliter of solution at
25.degree.C (C = 1), the relationships are as follows:
(log e .eta.rel)/C
and intrinsic viscosity (the limit of inherent viscosity as C
approaches 0 have the dimensions of dilution, i.e., the reciprocal
of concentration. Intrinsic viscosity and K are intended to be
independent of concentration. The preferred interpolymers are those
having a specific viscosity ranging from about 0.1 to about
4.5.
Preferred electrolytes are marketed in the United States by GAF
Corporation as Gantrez AN, poly (methyl vinyl ether) maleic
anhydride at various molecular weight grades as designated by their
viscosity as follows:
Viscosity Average Molecular Gantrez .eta. sp.* Weight
______________________________________ AN-119 0.1 - 0.5 250,000
AN-139 1.0 - 1.4 500,000 AN-149 1.5 - 2.0 750,000 AN-169 2.6 - 3.5
1,250,000 AN-179 3.6 - 4.5 2,250,000
______________________________________ *as determined on a solution
of 1.0 gm. of the copolymer in 100 ml of methyl ethyl ketone at
25.degree. C.
The two essential ingredients for cleansing compositions comprise
the detergent compound itself and the builder. Among the detergent
compositions useful in conjunction with the builders of this
invention are any of the classes of detergents commonly used for
laundry and household cleansers. These fall into the general
classes of nonionic, anionic, cationic, and amphoteric detergents.
Detergents from natural and synthetic sources falling within these
classes are amply set forth in "Detergents and Emulsifiers," J. W.
McCutcheon, editor, published by J. W. McCutcheon, Inc., 236 Mount
Kemble Ave., West Orange, N.J.
The nonionic detergents as the name implies, are those which do not
ionize in water solution. Among the nonionic synthetic detergents
commonly used are those formed by the condensation reaction of
ethylene oxide units with hydrophobic bases among which are
ethylene oxide condensates with alkyl phenols wherein the alkyl
group on the phenol contains from six to about 12 carbon atoms in
either straight or branched-chain configuration and the ethylene
oxide is present in amounts equal to 10 or 12 units of ethylene
oxide per mole of alkyl phenol. Further nonionic detergents are the
group of aliphatic alcohols condensed with ethylene oxide, i.e.,
alcohols having eight to 18 carbon atoms condensed with 8 to 30
units of ethylene oxide among which may be mentioned the condensate
of 10 to 30 moles of ethylene oxide with coconut alcohol fractions
having 10 to 14 carbon atoms. Other nonionic synthetic detergents
include the condensation products of ethylene oxide with propylene
oxide and diamines or phosphates and the long-chain tertiary
amines, oxides and tertiary phosphines oxides. These are eschewed
for the purposes of this invention for reasons of their pollution
proclivities.
The preferred nonionic detergents for the purposes of this
invention are the condensates of nonylphenol with ethylene oxide
offered commercially under the Igepal trademark by GAF Corporation,
New York City.
Among the anionic detergent compounds useful in the compositions of
this invention, there must be mentioned ordinary soap. This is the
alkali metal salts of long-chain fatty acids having at least 12
carbon atoms. Suitable soaps are the sodium, potassium and ammonium
salts of fatty acids, derived from oils and fats from vegetable and
animal sources.
Among the anionic synthetic detergent compounds are the
water-soluble salts and particularly the alkali metal salts of
organic sulfuric reaction products such as the sulfonates and
sulfates of alkyl and alkaryl moieties containing from eight to
about 22 carbon atoms in the alkyl portion of the radical.
Commercially important are the linear alkyl sulfonate sodium salts
such as sodium lauryl sulfonate and the sodium and potassium alkyl
benzene sulfonates such as are described in U.S. Pat. Nos.
2,220,009 and 2,477,383.
While the builders of this invention may be utilized with the
amphoteric synthetic detergents, it is preferred not to do so since
they generally fall within the broad class of amine derivatives and
due to the chelating nature of most of such amphoteric compounds
with heavy metals, it is preferred to avoid solubitized forms of
such toxic materials in household environments.
The cationic synthetic detergents are generally the quaternary
ammonium salts. Here due to the particular nature of the quaternary
ammonium compounds, i.e., their ready biodegradeability, an
exception is made concerning the utilization of nitrogen-containing
detergents for general household purposes. These compounds are
particularly useful due to their cold water detergency
characteristics. Particularly useful for cold water laundry
detergents is Soromine CAZ 70 (GAF Corporation) a cationic complex
polyalkyl amido imidezolinium sulfate. Usually the cationic
detergents are unstable in the presence of alkaline pH solutions
but the cationic detergents are fully compatible with the
polyelectrolyte/alkaline salts composite builder of this invention.
The particular composition composite builders of this invention
possibly due to the presence of the polyelectrolyte appear not to
have this adverse effect.
In general, the detergent and builder composite of the present
invention are utilized according to the following proportions:
composite builder -- parts by weight -- 5 to 70
surfactant -- parts by weight -- 5 to 100
The above tabulation is a representation of the proportions of the
active detergent to the composite builder in detergent cleansing
compositions according to this invention. Complete detergent
compositions, of course, contain many ancillary ingredients useful
for other purposes but having little to do directly with the
problem of soil removal and the prevention of soil redeposition
which combined indicate the cleansing effectiveness of the
cleansing compositions. Among ancillary agents which may be
included in complete detergent cleansing and/or laundry
compositions to adapt to certain specific applications, there may
be mentioned the optical brighteners, anti-corrosives, foam
stabilizers, defoaming agents, soil-suspending agents, enzymes,
bleaches and the like. The composite builder of this invention does
not interfere with most of these ancillary materials.
The final detergent cleansers of this invention may be compounded
as liquids or solids.
Additionally, there may be employed coloring materials, perfumes
and corrosion inhibitors. In general, the detergent cleansing
concentrates in the proportions tabulated above, plus any ancillary
agents are then diluted with water to the extent of 500 to 20,000
parts by weight of water. Water presents its own problems depending
on the degree of hardness and the presence of unwanted ions.
Hardness is measured by the amount of calcium and magnesium ions.
Such ions form insoluble non-detergent curds with long-chain fatty
acids thereby preventing full utilization of the detergent
compounds. Other deleterious ions include iron which in alkaline
solution tends to deposit as iron hydroxide, which upon drying and
oxidizing leaves unsightly stains (rust spots) on laundered
materials.
For general commercial practical use, it is preferred that the
ratio of polyelectrolytes to alkaline salts in the composite
builder, according to this invention, should range from 1 to 100 to
1 to 2 parts by weight. When the builder is used in ecologically
desirable detergent compositions, the ratio of the detergent
compound in the cleanser to the builder should be in the range of 8
parts by weight of the detergent to one part by weight of the
builder. To the other end of the range one part by weight of the
detergent to 100 parts by weight of the composite builder of this
invention. They may be formulated as solid compositions in powder
or shaped form or in liquid concentric form.
Table 1 below is a tabulation of concentration ranges of the
preferred polyelectrolyte of this invention, PVM/MA, the preferred
alkaline salts, and commercial detergent compounds to be formulated
into a condensate so that as diluted, the concentrate is equivalent
to industrial household and laundry products used at 1.0
grams/liter:
TABLE 1
__________________________________________________________________________
Detergent Use Range Preferred % by Weight of Solution %
__________________________________________________________________________
Poly (vinyl methyl ether/ maleic anhydride or Poly (vinyl methyl
ether/ maleic acid .001 - 5.0 .005 Alkali metal salts of weak acids
Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 .001 - 10.0 .050 Na.sub.2 SiO.sub.3 .001 - 10.0
.005 Borax .001 - 10.0 .005 Detergent .005 - 5.0 .0100 Optional
Additives CMC 0.0 - 1.0 .0005 Optical Brightener 0.0 - 0.5 .0003
Na.sub.2 SO.sub.4 0.0 - 10.0 .0292 Sodium bicarbonate 0.0 - 10.0 --
__________________________________________________________________________
It should be noted that PVM/MA is the preferred polyelectrolyte but
that mixtures of the alkaline salts may also be used in combination
with sodium carbonate for this invention. This composite with soda
ash is preferred on the basis of objective superiority as it has
been noted that when the detergency is measured according to the
objective test methods set forth below there is a synergism between
the polyelectrolyte and the sodium carbonate or silicate or borate
as regards the measurement of detergency at the various degrees of
water hardness commonly encountered in the United States. In the
Examples, Examples 1 and 7 show the detergency as a function of
water hardness for soda ash and sodium silicate polyelectrolyte
(PVM/MA) and the synergism found in the salts with this
polyelectrolyte as measured in the Terg-O-Tometer Detergency Test
as as described in "Detergency Evaluation and Testing" (J. C.
Harris, Interscience Publishers, N.Y.).
With the other commonly used polyelectrolytes, it has been found
that the detergency effect with alkaline salts is merely additive.
While such other polyelectrolyte/alkaline salts composites are
useful, they are not as commercially attractive or as competitively
attractive or as competitively cleansing or ecologically desirable
as the composites of this invention.
As noted, the preferred polyelectrolyte of this invention is
commercially marketed in various molecular weight ranges. The
various grades of polyelectrolyte are soluble in water and within
the concentration and pH ranges set forth, the molecular weight has
little or no effect upon the efficiacy of the builder compositions
of this invention.
In order to exemplify the present invention and to comparatively
demonstrate the advantages thereof, a series of formulations were
prepared and standardized samples were washed in these formulations
in order to evaluate their detergency and antisoil redeposition
properties. The procedure used to evaluate the detergency
properties of the product tested was as follows:
The Terg-O-Tometer Detergency Test as described in "Detergency
Evaluation and Testing" (J. C. Harris, Interscience Publishers,
N.Y.) was utilized. Standard soiled cotton cloth was purchased from
Test Fabrics, Inc. and used as a means of measuring detergency
properties.
The formula used to calculate percent detergency is given in
"Detergency Evaluation and Testing" (p. 105) and is:
[(A - E) - B/(C - B)] .times. 100 + % Detergency
where
A = reflectance of soiled swatch after washing
B = reflectance of soiled swatch before washing
C = reflectance of redeposition swatch before washing
E = net reduction in reflectance of redeposition swatch (before
washing minus after washing)
Whiteness is calculated according to a formula published in
"Measurements of the Appearance of Paint Finishes" by R. S. Hunter
(Official Digest, Vol. 35, No. 459, p. 250-365) where
W = g - 4 (g - b) and
G = green filter reflectance
B = blue filter reflectance
Standard soiled swatches together with unsoiled swatches were
washed in the Terg-O-Tometer using a solution of the product in the
designated water hardness. After washing 20 minutes, the swatches
were rinsed and iron dried and then measured for reflectance using
the Hunter D40 reflectometer. The data was then subjected to the
whiteness formula and the % detergency formula. The results are
given in the tables with each example.
EXAMPLE 1
The detergency of the preferred components of the composite
according to this invention, i.e., poly (vinyl methyl/maleic
anhydride) and Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 was measured in formulations
without any synthetic detergent compound present. Tests were made
at various degrees of water hardness. The results clearly
illustrate the detergency synergism resulting from the preferred
builder composites of this invention.
__________________________________________________________________________
Composition: Gantrez AN 119 -- .01% -- .01% Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 -- --
.05% .05% Conditions Dist. Water Plus Composition (Without
Surfactant)
__________________________________________________________________________
A. -- 32.2 29.2 34.8 37.5 B. 25 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3
21.1 25.8 6.8 34.3 C. 100 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 7.4 7.9
-13.5 25.0 D. 200 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 -25.0 5.8 7.0
25.6 E. 300 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 -35.0 4.7 16.2 34.2 F.
1000 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 -48.0 -21.7 -3.5 16.8
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 2
This example illustrates the detergency improvement of a complete
detergent composition including a nonionic synthetic detergent
Igepal CO630 (TM) marketed by GAF Corporation and which is
generically described as a nonylphenol-ethylene oxide condensation
product according to U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,970,578 and 2,213,472.
__________________________________________________________________________
Composition Igepal CO630 .02% .02% .02% .02% Gantrez AN119 -- .01%
-- .01% Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 -- -- .05% .05% Conditions Dist. Water
Plus Detergency With Igepal CO630
__________________________________________________________________________
A. 25 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 24.7 40.2 19.2 53.6 B. 100
ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 28.3 4.8 21.1 51.1
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 3
This example illustrates a composition containing the anionic
detergent dodecyl benzene sulfonate marketed by Arco Chemical Co.
under the name Ultrawet 60K.
__________________________________________________________________________
Composition Ultrawet 60K .033% .033% .033% .033% Gantrez AN119 --
.01% -- .01% Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 -- -- .05% .05% Conditions Dist.
Water Plus % Detergency With Ultrawet 60K
__________________________________________________________________________
A. 25 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 22.7 35.4 31.3 30.7 B. 100
ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 18.5 30.0 34.1 45.3 C. 300 ppm
CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 -13.0 4.1 27.2 41.5
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 4
This example illustrates the effectiveness of the builder composite
of this invention with the anionic surfactant GAFAC RA600 (TM)
marketed by GAF Corporation and which is a complex organic
phosphate ester based on linear alcohols.
__________________________________________________________________________
Composition GAFAC RA600 .02% .02% .02% .02% Gantrez AN119 -- .01%
-- .01% Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 -- -- .05% .05% Conditions Dist. Water
Plus % Detergency with GAFAC RA600
__________________________________________________________________________
A. 25 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 32.7 31.6 37.4 37.2 B. 100
ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 28.1 25.1 42.3 39.8 C. 300 ppm
CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 10.7 11.5 26.6 39.8
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 5
This example illustrates the effectiveness of the builder composite
of this invention with sodium oleate or soap as the anionic
detergent.
__________________________________________________________________________
Composition Na+ Oleate .02% .02% .02% .02% Gantrez AN119 -- .01% --
.01% Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 -- -- .05 .05% Conditions Dist. Water Plus %
Detergency with Sodium Oleate
__________________________________________________________________________
A. 25 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 33.3 29.1 -10.7 16.3 B. 100
ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 -8.0 23.3 1.8 12.4 C. 300 ppm
CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 -35.0 7.0 25.1 24.8
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 6
This example illustrates the effectiveness of the builder composite
of this invention with the cationic detergent Soromine CAZ-75(TM)
marketed by GAF Corporation and which is a complex polyalkyl amido
imidazolinium sulfate.
__________________________________________________________________________
Composition Soromine CAZ-75 0.0266% 0.0266% 0.0266% 0.0266% Gantrez
AB119 -- .01% -- .01% Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 -- -- .05% .05% Conditions
Dist. Water Plus % Detergency with Soromine CAZ-75
__________________________________________________________________________
A. 25 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 -52.8 18.3 -86.3 24.1
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 7
This example illustrates the effectiveness of the builder composite
of this invention utilizing sodium meta silicates as the alkaline
salt instead of sodium carbonate. The detergency effect of the
polyelectrolyte and the Na.sub.2 SiO.sub.3 of the components of the
builder composite is synergistic.
__________________________________________________________________________
Composition Na.sub.2 SiO.sub.3 .05% .05% .05% .05% Gantrez AN119 --
.01% .01% -- .01% Igepal CO630 -- -- .02% .02% Conditions Dist.
Water Plus % Detergency with Sodium Metasilicate
__________________________________________________________________________
A. 100 ppm CaCl.sub.2, 5 ppm FeCl.sub.3 14.2 7.9 31.2 39.4 51.0
__________________________________________________________________________
As can be seen from Example 1 and 7, the combination of the poly
(vinyl methyl/maleic anhydride with sodium carbonate or sodium
metasilicate is more effective than either component alone. This
performance is more noticeable as the water hardness increases.
Examples 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, aside from their demonstration of the
effectiveness and utility of the composite builder of this
invention with nonionic, anionic and cationic detergents, also
demonstrate the synergistic performance of the preferred
polyelectrolyte of this invention with soda ash in total
formulation.
While the prime purpose of the builder composite of this invention
is to provide non-polluting builders for household, industrial and
laundry purposes, the novel builders may also serve not only to
completely replace the phosphate and nitrogen-containing builders
previously used but may also partially replace them during interim
periods of product change-over. Example 8 below is a comparison of
detergency and redeposition data of the commonly used builders with
the composite builder of this invention and its components:
EXAMPLE 8
__________________________________________________________________________
Use Detergency Builder Compounds Concentration/% Water
Hardness(ppm) Average Redeposition
__________________________________________________________________________
Sodium Tripolyphosphate (STPP) 0.2 100 36.8 60.5 NTA 0.1 100 40.6
63.3 Sodium Carbonate 0.05 100 33.5 60.2 Sodium Sulfate 0.2 100
31.5 64.3 Poly (vinyl methyl/maleic anhydride) (Gantrez AN-149 pH -
7.0) 0.02 100 33.5 67.1 Poly (vinyl methyl/maleic anhydride)
(Gantrez AN-149 + NaCO.sub.3) 0.02 + 0.05 100 44.0 65.0
__________________________________________________________________________
Wherever parts or percentages are mentioned, they are to be
construed as parts and percentages by weight. While the invention
has been demonstrated in the examples by certain specific
formulations, such examples merely indicate exemplary modes and
compositions but the invention is not to be construed as limited to
such as the sole preferred modes and compositions as all
equivalents thereto are intended.
* * * * *