U.S. patent number 3,867,798 [Application Number 05/360,463] was granted by the patent office on 1975-02-25 for method of producing variable profile bi-focal lens.
Invention is credited to Alan A. Masucci.
United States Patent |
3,867,798 |
Masucci |
February 25, 1975 |
METHOD OF PRODUCING VARIABLE PROFILE BI-FOCAL LENS
Abstract
Bi-focal blanks are produced which have constant optical
centering for minimization of vertical imbalance, the blanks
produced by pre-selecting one or more diopter series having
predetermined distance, then establishing a pair of terminal lines
from a central point equal to the diopter distance to finite
positions above and below said dividing line representing the
optical centering of the line, then developing a plurality of radii
from each of said terminal lines to each of the distance and
reading portions, then placing the lens blank on a lens-blocking
wheel and grinding with a first tool to a first curvature, then
deblocking and blocking on a smaller wheel and grinding with
another cut tool to form the other curvature, both these curvatures
being the distance and reading powers required for minimization of
vertical imbalance.
Inventors: |
Masucci; Alan A. (Bronx,
NY) |
Family
ID: |
23418054 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/360,463 |
Filed: |
May 15, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
451/42;
351/159.62; 351/159.74; 65/37 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B24B
13/02 (20130101); B24B 13/0012 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B24B
13/00 (20060101); B24B 13/02 (20060101); B24b
013/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;51/284,327 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Kelly; Donald G.
Claims
Having defined the invention, what is claimed is:
1. In a system for producing bi-focal lens of constant optical
centering from semi-finished blanks having reading and distance
portions separated by a dividing line, the method comprising,
a. the pre-selection of one or more diopter series having
pre-determined distances,
b. establishing a pair of equal terminal lines from a central point
equal to said diopter distance to finite positions above and below
said dividing line representing the optical centering of the
lens,
c. developing a plurality of radii from each of said terminal lines
to each of the distance and reading portions, each of said radii
being comparable to the prescriptive powers of the respective
distance and reading portions of the lens,
d. placing each of a plurality of lens blanks of each series on a
lens blocking wheel whose radius is comparable to the radius of
curvature of the distance portion of said bi-focals in one
direction,
e. grinding the lens on said wheel with a first shiftable grinding
tool having a preselected radius of curvature to effect grinding of
the lens according to selected distance optical powers, and capable
of being shifted in a direction equal to the selected variation of
said distance optic powers,
f. de-blocking lens blanks from said wheel and placing same on a
second blocking wheel whose radius is comparable to the reading
portion of said bi-focals in one direction, and
g. subjecting said wheel to the grinding action of a second
partially sectioned grinding tool having a radius of curvature in
another direction to said blocking wheel and disposed to being
shifted in a direction equal to the variations of reading optic
powers, the completed blanks of each selective series having
constant optical centering for the minimization of vertical
imbalance.
2. In a system according to claim 1 and wherein said diopter series
is equivalent to plus-base series -4, -6 and -8.
3. In a system according to claim 1 and wherein said finite
positions above and below said dividing line is 3 millimeters and 5
millimeters, respectively.
4. In a system according to claim 1 and wherein said second
partially sectioned grinding tool is greater than one-half of the
full size of said tool.
5. In a system according to claim 1 and wherein said second
partially sectioned grinding tool is less than one-half of the full
size of said tool.
Description
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Present day bi-focal spectacles are generally selected from stock
blanks and ground down to conform to prescription requirements. The
blanks traditionally have been made with the distance-near optical
center proximity at a fixed relationship angularly.
When there is a balance-equal vision in both eyes the use of
bi-focals does not create any real physical problem in going from
the distance level to reading level with the exception of image
displacement. However, when there is an imbalance in vision between
both eyes, one eye views the distance and reading from different
optical centers than the other. This imbalance is generally
referred to as vertical imbalance. Prism is measured by the number
of millimeters the eye wanders away from the optical center
multiplied by the power of the lens in a given meridian. The
difference in prismatic effect between the two lenses is the
vertical imbalance. This problem essentially occurs when the
correction for each eye is of a different dioptric power than the
other. The degree to which the vertical imbalance becomes a problem
depends on the magnitude of the difference in dioptric correction
for each eye.
Vertical imbalance has always been corrected by what is known as
"slab-off;" that is, the blanks are specially ground by skilled
technicians to assure proper balance. However, the use of skilled
technicians is expensive, time-consuming and dependant upon the
skill of the operator and at best only balances prisms and does not
provide the viewer with the advantage of viewing through the
optical centers of the lenses. The elimination of vertical
imbalance in bi-focals must be automatic to the point where the
selection of the proper blanks may be done by unskilled or
semi-skilled personnel. In other words, there should be a built-in
system where the semi-finished blanks are structured in categories
so designed as to cover every conceivable vertical imbalance
situation so that mere pre-selection of the blank would
automatically take into consideration vertical imbalance.
Bi-focal blanks traditionally have been made with the distance-near
proximity as a fixed relationship angularly to produce a constant
optical centering.
It is the purpose of this application to provide for built-in
variations of the distance-near angular relationship, on the convex
side of the blank that automatically balances distance and near
optical centers.
It is another object of the invention to provide a system for
producing bi-focal lenses that eliminates or reduces vertical
imbalance to a minimum.
Another object of the invention is to provide a system for
producing bi-focal lenses that is simple, economical and
efficient.
A still further object of the invention is to provide a system for
producing bi-focal blanks having pre-selected distance-near
relationships that provide systematic compensation for vertical
imbalance and image displacement.
A still further object of the invention is to provide a system for
producing a multiple series of multi-focal blanks and wherein
grinding tool selection closely adheres to prescription
requirements.
Another object of the invention is to provide a system for
producing lens blanks that vary in angular relationship "distance
portion" to "reading portion" so as to produce a constant optical
centering in that the distance optical center and the reading
optical center would always locate at the most desirable
pre-determined setting in the completed bi-focal lens regardless of
prescriptive requirements.
Further objects and advantages will become apparent from a reading
of the specifications and a study of the accompanying drawings, and
wherein;
FIG. 1 shows a simplified drawing of bi-focal spectacles with the
placement of distance-near optical proximity centers;
FIG. 2 illustrates the presentation of a present-day bi-focal blank
with centers of the distance-near radii on the same line dividing
two fields.
FIG. 3 is similar to FIG. 2 except the two semi-circular segments
are rotated away from each other.
FIG. 4 is similar to FIG. 2 except that the two semi-circular
segments are rotated towards and inward to each other.
FIGS. 5a, b, c, d, and e represent schematically the angular
deviation of both distance and reading theoretical lines from the
present-day line from which the respective radii are drawn.
FIGS. 6a, and 6b illustrate a method of grinding present-day
bi-focal lenses, and is a part of the prior art.
FIGS. 7, 8 and 8a show the lens blocking wheel and grinding tools
for grinding the distance and reading portions of the bi-focal
blanks.
FIG. 9 illustrates the bi-focal blank with centers of the
distance-near radii on different dividing the two fields according
to one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 10 illustrates the bi-focal of FIG. 9 according to still
another embodiment of the invention.
Now describing the invention in more detail according to the
different embodiments, there is shown in FIG. 1 a pair of bi-focal
spectacles 1 having a pair of lens 2 and 3, each of said lens being
split into an additional pair 4, 5 and 6, 1, respectively. In
general, the upper lens 4 and 6 are for distance vision, each
having optical centers 7 and 8 and the lower lens 5 and 1 are for
near vision, each having optical centers 9 and 10. The four optical
centers as shown represent a structure wherein the user would not
experience vertical imbalance nor image displacement.
The construction of a pair of bi-focal spectacles generally starts
from the selection of the proper semi-finished blanks 11, shown in
FIG. 2, which in effect is composed of two semi-finished lens
surfaces 12, 13, with two different radii of curvature made from a
single glass blank having a single radius of curvature 15 on the
concave portion of the blank that is unfinished and different radii
of curvature 16 and 17 on the outer convex portion of the said
blank is a continuation of surfaces 12, 13. The outer radii 16, 17
represent the optical parameters or powers for meeting the required
prescriptive measurements. The center of curvature 18 from which
the radius 16 is taken, representing the curvature 18 from which
the radius 16 is taken, representing the curvature for the inner
part of the blank is placed on a base line 19 which represents the
separation of fields 20, 21 from which the radii 16 and 17 have
their center. This base line 19 may also be referred to as the
theoretical line. Thus, there is produced what is called a
mono-centric bi-focal. However, the two centers being exactly on
the same base or theoretical line serves the user adversely since
he cannot view through the distracting obstruction (the line
separating the reading and distance portion) of the bi-focal lens.
He must look above the line to see through the distance area, and
below the line to see through the reading area. If it happens that
the lenses for the right and left eyes are of equal power, the
wearer will experience image displacement a consequent of looking
away from the optical center of the lens. As previously discussed,
this is not an ideal optical condition and is not the primary
factor herein for the invention, but rather for the prevention of a
much more serious eye discomfort called vertical imbalance in
bi-focals. This problem occurs when the correction for each eye is
of a different dioptric power. The degree to which the vertical
imbalance becomes a problem depends on the magnitude of the
difference in dioptric correction for each eye.
FIGS. 3 and 4 are comparable to FIG. 2 but as in FIG. 3 the two
fields are pried apart by a finite angle A and in FIG. 4 they are
forced together by a finite angle B. Both FIGS. 3 and 4 present
exaggerated extremes of the profile. It is this variation in
profiles by which semi-finished blanks will produce bi-centering
that is standard within acceptable limits. This standard
bi-centering could be accomplished by creating three different
series of plus-base semi-finished bi-focal blanks of series -4, -6,
and -8. Each of these curves would be keyed angularly to a
semi-finished plus base curve and its reading made additive. These
base series are merely illustrative and any series can be utilized.
It is the angular relationship of each series between base and
reading portions that is maintained in a fixed arrangement so as to
produce a constant optical centering and thereby effect a
reading-optical and distance optical center that is most desirable
to the user.
The optical centers of distance and reading portions in bi-focals
in general are believed by some authorities to be approximately 8
millimeters apart. Technicians in the ophthalmic industry generally
know which base (distance) curve blank to use for a given
prescription power. With the lens blanks described herein the
technician would have to select the proper series after he selects
the proper base for the prescription he is to grind. He would have
to select a series number that is closest to the number of the
grinding tool he will be using for his particular prescription.
Because of the varying angular relationship of distance (base) to
reading, the distance portion optical center would always locate
approximately 3 millimeters above the dividing line (the line
dividing the bifocals) and the reading portion optical center would
always locate approximately 5 millimeters below the dividing line.
These distances above and below the said dividing line can be set
to any arbitrary figure as dictated by the need of the
profession.
The angular relationships, exaggerated by FIGS. 3 and 4 may be more
clearly defined and illustrated as shown by FIGS. 5a - e. FIG. 5a
shows the theoretical line 25 of present-day bi-focals also set at
an angle of 90.degree. from a reference line 26. It is this line 26
from which the distance portion radius 27 and the reading radius 28
are drawn. FIGS. 5b and 5c show the theoretical line varying from
the original setting, in one case it is 88.degree. 21' and the
other 91.degree. 32' for the base or distance portion of the
bi-focal. In FIGS. 5d and 5e, the theoretical line for the reading
portion varies from 88.degree. to 94.degree. 23'.
From FIGS. 5b and 5c when the theoretical line varies from the
angle 88.degree. 21' to 91.degree. 32', it was empirically found
that the distance portion optical center always was found to be 3
millimeters above the dividing line. For the reading portion, as
shown by FIGS. 5d and 5e, it was also found empirically that where
angle varies from 88.degree. to 94.degree. 23' the location of the
reading optical center would be 5 millimeters below the dividing
line.
Presently, bi-focals are produced by setting the distance portion
(base) tool 30, shown in FIG. 6a exactly on center so that they are
ground and polished prism free. The lens blanks 31 are first placed
on a blocking wheel 32 and ground down to meet the distance portion
of the blanks or bi-focals by use of the aforementioned grinding
tool 30. After the required grinding has been effected, the lens
blanks are de-blocked from the wheel 32 and placed on a smaller
diameter wheel 33, as shown in FIG. 6b. Here, again, lens grinding
is effected by a smaller radius grinding tool 34 that is cut
exactly in half. This latter grinding is for producing the reading
portion of the blank. The more sophisticated methods for grinding
lenses using the wheel and grinding tool above mentioned may be
gleaned from the art and also from U.S. Pat. No. 2,847,804,
Calkins, et al. The production of blanks as contemplated by the
instant invention, the grinding tool must be shifted varying
amounts either to left or right to meet the requirements set by the
angular variations of 88.degree. 21' to 91.degree. 32' shown in
FIGS. 5b and 5c. FIG. 7 shows partially the blocking wheel 40 and
lens blank 41 residing circumferentially thereon with grinding tool
42 positioned for proper cutting. The blank is ground and polished
accordingly with the tool shifting to produce the controlled
angular variations previously defined.
In producing the second half, the reading portion, the smaller
radius tool again has to be cut, as shown in FIGS. 8 and 8a, but
not exactly in half as in producing the present-day blanks.
Instead, the tool will vary in being partially sectioned or cut
just short of half to slightly more than half of full size. Only
the reading portion tools are cut, whereas distance portion is
produced by shifting full-size tools left or right. The shifting of
tools, either full-size or cut, varies in different amounts and in
different degrees depending to what extent the base and reading
lines have shifted from the theoretical lines as previously
mentioned.
FIGS. 9 and 10 show different blank series and how a lens is
developed to maintain minimum vertical imbalance. In FIG. 9, as an
example, a 4 diopter series (132.5 mm.) is chosen and two radii 53
and 51, called terminal lines, are drawn from a central point 52 to
the inner lens blank surface 54, one (53) 3 mm. above the blank
dividing line 55 and the other (51) 4 mm. below the blank dividing
line. The lengths of the radii are 132.5 mm. or 4 diopters. These
radii or terminal lines then become the loci for all centers of
radii for the base and reading curves. FIG. 10 is comparable to
FIG. 9, where the series represents a diopter of 8 (66.2 mm.).
Here, again, the center of radii 60 and 61 originate at a point 62
and terminate 3 mm. above and 5 mm. below the bi-focal dividing
line 63. However, it can be seen here that the distance and reading
radii 64 and 65, respectively, are longer than the diopter radii
60, 61. Hence, these latter radii must be extended to 66 and 67 to
assure that the radii 64 and 65 have lines to extend from.
In the foregoing manner uniform centering for the whole multiple
series and multiple base curves are formed that eliminates or
minimizes vertical imbalance and image displacement.
It can be appreciated that the foregoing represents particular
embodiments of the invention and that there are various changes and
modifications which can be made and further defined without
detracting from the true scope and extent of the invention. For
example, the development and cutting of the various blanks
according to any given series may be extended not only to glass but
also to the production of plastic blanks. For example, any series
blank cut from glass according to the invention may then be used to
produce molds for plastic bi-focals.
* * * * *