U.S. patent number 3,867,635 [Application Number 05/456,503] was granted by the patent office on 1975-02-18 for achromatic magnetic beam deflection system.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Varian Associates. Invention is credited to Karl L. Brown, William G. Turnbull.
United States Patent |
3,867,635 |
Brown , et al. |
February 18, 1975 |
Achromatic magnetic beam deflection system
Abstract
A collimated beam of non-monoenergetic charged particles, such
as electrons, is passed into a magnetic beam deflection system
consisting of at least three uniform field, beam bending magnets
spaced apart along the central orbital axis of the beam for
magnetically bending the beam by a relatively large angle as of
270.degree.. The uniform field beam bending magnets are
dimensioned, shaped, and spaced apart along the orbital axis such
that the collimated beam is imaged at the beam exit plane without
incurring either spatial or angular dispersion nor producing a
significant increase in the spot size of the beam. Such a beam
deflection system is particularly advantageous for use in an X-ray
therapy machine.
Inventors: |
Brown; Karl L. (Menlo Park,
CA), Turnbull; William G. (Cupertino, CA) |
Assignee: |
Varian Associates (Palo Alto,
CA)
|
Family
ID: |
26984867 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/456,503 |
Filed: |
April 1, 1974 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
325296 |
Jan 22, 1973 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
250/396R;
335/210; 250/399; 976/DIG.434 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G21K
1/093 (20130101); A61N 5/10 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G21K
1/00 (20060101); G21K 1/093 (20060101); A61N
5/10 (20060101); H01j 037/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;250/396,398,399
;335/210 ;328/230 ;313/79,62 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lawrence; James W.
Assistant Examiner: Church; C. E.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Cole; Stanley Z. Herbert; Leon F.
Morrissey; John J.
Parent Case Text
RELATED CASES
The present application is a continuation application of copending
parent application U.S. Ser. No. 325,296, filed Jan. 22, 1973 now
abandoned and assigned to the same assignee as the present
invention.
Claims
1. In a method for achromatic magnetic deflection of a beam of
non-monoenergetic charged particles through a bending angle .PSI.
along a central orbital axis defined by the trajectory of a charge
particle of a reference momentum P.sub.O is a bending plane between
transverse beam entrance and beam exit planes the steps of:
subjecting the beam of charged particles to a series of magnetic
deflection forces for;
focusing beam particles of the reference momentum P.sub.O which are
initially radially displaced in the bending plane from the orbital
axis at the beam entrance plane to first and second crossovers of
the central orbital axis and also to trajectories with
approximately zero slope relative to the orbital axis at a region
along the orbital axis intermediate the beam entrance and beam exit
planes;
focusing beam particles of the reference momentum P.sub.O having
trajectories which are on and angularly divergent from the orbital
axis in the beam bending plane at the beam entrance plane to a
crossover of the orbital axis at a region along the orbital axis
intermediate the beam entrance and beam exit planes;
focusing beam particles of the reference momentum P.sub.O which are
initially displaced from and parallel to the orbital axis in the
transverse plane at the beam entrance plane to a crossover of the
central orbital axis at a region along the orbital axis
intermediate the beam entrance and beam exit planes;
focusing beam particles of the reference momentum P.sub.O which
have initial trajectories on and angularly divergent from the
orbital axis in the transverse plane at the beam entrance plane to
a crossover of the orbital axis at the beam exit plane and to
trajectories having zero slope relative to the orbital axis at a
region along the orbital axis intermediate the beam entrance and
beam exit planes; and
achromatically focusing beam particles of a momentum differing from
the reference momentum P.sub.O and having a trajectory initially
coincident with the orbital axis at the beam entrance plane to the
orbital axis at
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said beam particles initially
radially displaced in the bending plane from and parallel to the
orbital axis at the beam entrance plane are focused to trajectories
which have approximately zero slope relative to the orbital axis at
a region which is approximately midway along the orbital axis
between the beam entrance plane and the beam exit plane, such mid
region being in a transverse plane
3. The method of claim 2 wherein said beam particles which are
focused to first and second crossovers of the orbital axis have
such crossovers on
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said beam particles initially
angularly divergent in the bending plane from and on the orbital
axis at the beam entrance plane are focused to the crossover of the
orbital axis at a mid transverse plane of symmetry occurring at a
beam bending angle of .PSI./2.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said beam particles initially
transversely displaced from the orbital axis in the transverse
plane at the beam entrance plane are focused to the crossover of
the orbital axis at a transverse mid-plane of symmetry occurring at
beam bending angle of
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said beam particles initially
angularly divergent from and on the orbital axis in the transverse
plane at the beam entrance plane are focused to trajectories having
zero slope relative to the orbital axis substantially at a
transverse mid plane of symmetry at a
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said beam particles initially
transversely displaced from the orbital axis in the transverse
plane at the beam entrance plane are focused to the crossover of
the orbital axis at a transverse mid-plane of symmetry occurring at
a beam bending angle of approximately .PSI./2, and wherein the beam
particles initially angularly divergent from and on the orbital
axis in the transverse plane at the beam entrance plane are focused
to trajectories having zero slope relative to the orbital axis
substantially at a transverse plane of symmetry at a beam
8. The method of claim 1 including the step of, shaving off a
radial edge of the beam at said plane of symmetry occurring at a
beam bending angle of
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the series of magnetic beam
deflecting forces are produced by applying the magnetic field of at
least three pairs of magnetic poles spaced apart along the central
orbital axis to direct their respective magnetic fields across said
central orbital axis in the transverse direction, such magnetic
poles being of a polarity such that all of the applied magnetic
fields of the three pairs of magnetic poles
10. The method of claim 9 wherein at least two of the three sets of
magnetic pole pairs are substantially identical and each identical
pole pair is energized to produce substantially equal transverse
magnetic
11. The method of claim 1 wherein said bending angle .PSI. is
approximately
12. In an apparatus for achromatic magnetic deflection of a beam of
non-monoenergetic charged particles through a bending angle .PSI.
along a central orbital axis defined by the trajectory of a charged
particle of a reference momentum P.sub.O in a bending plane between
transverse beam entrance and beam exit planes:
means for magnetically deflecting beam particles of the reference
momentum P.sub.O which are initially radially displaced in the
bending plane from the orbital axis and initially parallel to the
orbital axis at the beam entrance plane into a trajectory having
first and second crossovers of the orbital axis, and such
trajectory having approximate zero slope relative to the orbital
axis at a region along the orbital axis intermediate the beam
entrance and beam exit planes;
means for magnetically deflecting beam particles of the reference
momentum P.sub.O and which are initially on and angularly divergent
from the orbital axis in the beam bending plane at the beam
entrance plane into trajectories having a crossover of the orbital
axis at a region along the orbital axis intermediate the beam
entrance and beam exit planes;
means for magnetically deflecting beam particles of the reference
momentum P.sub.O and which are initially displaced from and
parallel to the orbital axis in the transverse plane at the beam
entrance plane into trajectories having a crossover with the
central orbital axis at a region along the orbital axis
intermediate the beam entrance and the beam exit planes;
means for magnetically deflecting beam particles of the reference
momentum P.sub.O and having initial trajectories on and angularly
divergent from the orbital axis in the transverse plane at the beam
entrance plane into trajectories having a crossover of the central
orbital axis at the beam exit plane and such trajectories having
zero slope realtive to the orbital axis at a region along the
orbital axis intermediate the beam entrance and beam exit planes;
and
means for magnetically deflecting beam particles of a momentum
differing from the reference momentum P.sub.O and having
trajectories initially coincident with the orbital axis at the beam
entrance plane into trajectories that are achromatically focused to
the orbital axis at the
13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said means for magnetically
deflecting said beam particles initially radially displaced in the
beam bending plane and parallel to the orbital axis to trajectories
having approximately zero slope includes, means for focusing said
particles to trajectories which have approximately zero slope
relative to the orbital axis at a transverse mid-plane of symmetry
occurring at a bending angle of
14. The apparatus of claim 13 wherein said means for deflecting
said beam particles to first and second crossovers of the orbital
axis includes, means for focusing said particles to trajectories
having crossovers of the
15. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said means for magnetically
deflecting said particles which are initially angularly divergent
in the bending plane from and on the orbital axis at the beam
entrance plane includes, means for focusing said particles to the
crossover of the orbital axis at a mid-transverse plane of symmetry
occurring at a bending
16. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said means for magnetically
deflecting said beam particles which are initially transversely
displaced from the orbital axis in the transverse plane at the beam
entrance plane includes, means for deflecting said particles to the
crossover of the orbital axis at a transverse mid-plane of symmetry
occurring at a beam
17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein said means for deflecting
said beam particles initially angularly divergent from and on the
orbital axis of the transverse plane at the beam entrance plane
includes, means for focusing said trajectories to substantially
zero slope relative to the orbital axis substantially at a
transverse mid-plane of symmetry at a beam
18. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said means for magnetically
deflecting said beam particles initially angularly divergent from
and on the orbital axis in the transverse plane at the beam
entrance plane includes, means for focusing said particles to
trajectories having zero slope relative to the orbital axis at a
point substantially at a transverse mid-plane of symmetry at a beam
bending angle of approximately
19. The apparatus of claim 12 including, means for shaving off a
radial edge of the beam at a region which is approximately mid-way
along the
20. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said means for producing a
series of magnetic beam deflection forces comprises, at least three
pairs of magnetic poles positioned along the central orbital axis
to direct their respective magnetic fields across said central
orbital axis in the
21. The apparatus of claim 20 wherein at least two of said three
sets of magnetic pole pairs are substantially identical, and means
for energizing each identical pole pair to produce substantially
equal transverse
22. The apparatus of claim 21 wherein each pair of said magnetic
pole means has an input face and an output face each defining an
edge extending across the orbital axis, and wherein each of said
input and output edges is inclined at substantially the same angle
.beta. to the central orbital
23. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said beam bending angle .PSI.
is
24. The apparatus of claim 12 including, shunt means defining a
magnetically permeable body disposed in between adjacent angularly
spaced sets of said pole pairs for shielding the beam from magnetic
fields fringing between adjacent pole pairs, said magnetically
permeable body
25. The apparatus of claim 12 including, linear accelerator means
for generating a beam of electrons and for feeding the beam of
electrons to the beam deflection apparatus, X-ray target means
disposed to receive the deflected beam of electrons for generating
a lobe of X-rays, and means for
26. The apparatus of claim 25 including, collimator means disposed
between said linear accelerator means and said beam deflection
apparatus for
27. The apparatus of claim 12 including, wherein said magnetic
deflection means includes a plurality of beam bending magnets
disposed along the central orbital axis and including means for
shaving off a radial edge of the beam in the beam bending plane at
a region along the central orbital axis in between adjacent ones of
said beam bending magnets.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Heretofore, achromatic beam deflection systems have been proposed
for bending a non-monoenergetic beam of electrons, as collimated at
the end of a linear accelerator, over a substantial angle as of
270.degree.. The beam is bent into an X-ray target to produce a
lobe of X-rays for X-ray therapy purposes. Such a beam deflection
system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,691,374 issued Sept. 12,
1972.
In this prior magnetic deflection system, the design fails to take
into account spot size and angular divergence of the beam in the
plane transverse to the bending plane. As a consequence, the
magnetic gaps of the individual beam bending magnets must be
excessively large or else beam transmission is reduced by
interception of the beam on the magnet structure. In addition, beam
spot diameter and angular divergence of the beam spot at the target
in the transverse plane should be substantially equal to the
divergence and spot diameter at the target in the bending plane or
else the pattern of X-rays produced at the target is not circularly
symmetric. Lack of circular symmetry in the lobe of X-rays may be
corrected by asymmetric X-ray absorbing filter members but this
introduces an undesired complexity into the radiation therapy
machine.
Thus, it is desired to have an achromatic magnetic beam deflection
system of the type wherein the deflected emergent beam particles
will follow a predetermined path, with substantially no positional
or angular momentum dispersion introduced by the deflection system
regardless of the initial momentum of the individual beam
particles. In such a system, the emergent deflected beam has
essentially the same phase space configuration as the initial beam
with no significant increase in spot size.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
The principal object of the present invention is the provision of
an improved method and apparatus for achromatic magnetic deflection
of a beam of non-monoenergetic charged particles.
In one feature of the present invention, the parameters of the
magnetic beam deflection system such as .beta. angles, i.e., angles
that the beam entrance and exit faces of the individual beam
bending magnets make at the points of intersection with radii of
the central orbital axis, drift lengths l, bending angles .alpha.,
and beam bending radii of curvature .rho. of the bending magnets
are all chosen such that the input beam to the deflection system is
imaged at the output plane without incurring either spatial or
angular dispersion or a significant increase in spot size.
In another feature of the present invention, the magnetic beam
deflection system comprises three identical beam bending magnets
disposed along the deflected beam path in such a manner that a
plane of symmetry, substantially normal to the central orbital
axis, occurs at one-half the total beam deflection angle, whereby
construction of the beam deflection system is simplified.
In another feature of the present invention, the radial focusing
parameters of the magnetic deflection system are chosen to provide
a waist of monoenergetic particles at a point where the
non-monoenergetic particles are radially dispersed in proportion to
their momentum dispersion. An energy selection slit or shaver is
provided at the radial waist or relatively near thereto for
momentum analyzing the beam to eliminate tails in the momentum
spectrum, thereby minimizing the effect of a fluctuating momentum
spectrum of the beam. In a preferred embodiment, the energy
selecton slit or beam shaver is located in a position such that the
bulk of the radiation emanating from the momentum defining slit or
shaver may be adequately shielded from the final target position
and thus not interfere with the patient treatment procedure.
In another feature of the present invention, the transverse beam
focusing and deflection parameters of the magnetic deflection
system are chosen to provide an envelope waist midway along the
central orbital axis, whereby the magnetic gap width of the bending
magnets, for a given beam transmission, is minimized.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become
apparent upon a perusal of the following specification taken in
conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a magnetic deflection system incorporating
features of the present invention and depicting the beam particle
trajectories in the bending plane for, the central orbital axis,
initially radially divergent particles s.sub.x, and for initially
parallel radially displaced particles c.sub.x,
FIG. 2 is a view of the structure of FIG. 1 taken along line 2--2
in the direction of the arrows,
FIG. 3 is a simplified view similar to that of FIG. 1 depicting the
central orbital axis and beam particle trajectories for momentum
dispersive particles initially on the central orbital axis,
FIG. 4 is a view of the transverse plane containing the central
orbital axis of the structure of FIG. 1 taken along line 4--4 in
the direction of the arrows and depicting the beam particle
trajectories for an initially parallel transversely displaced
particle and for an initially transversely divergent beam
particle,
FIG. 5 is a plot of the number of electrons versus momentum
depicting the momentum distribution of a typical output beam of a
linear accelerator,
FIG. 6 is a plot of the number of electrons versus radial
displacement in the bending plane from the central orbital axis for
the momentum analyzed beam of FIG. 1 at the plane of symmetry,
FIG. 7 is a schematic side elevational view of an X-ray therapy
machine employing features of the present invention,
FIG. 8 is an enlarged sectional view of a portion of the structure
of FIG. 1 taken along line 8-8 in the direction of the arrows and
depicting the input face of one of the bending magnets, and
FIG. 9 is a plot of magnetic field versus distance along the
orbital at the edge of a bending magnet and depicting a method for
determining the effective edge of the bending magnet.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown, in plan view, a magnetic
deflection system 11 incorporating features of the present
invention. The system 11 includes three uniform field bending
electromagnets 12, 13 anad 14 arranged along the curved trajectory
defining the central orbital axis 15 of the beam deflection system
11. More particularly, the central orbital axis 15 lies in and
defines the radial bending plane and is that trajectory followed by
a charged particle of a reference momentum P.sub.0 entering the
deflection system 11 at the origin 16 and initially traveling in a
predetermined direction which defines the initial trajectory of the
central orbital axis 15. The charged particles of the beam are
preferably initially collimated by a beam collimator 17 and
projected through the beam entrance plane at the origin 16 into the
magnetic deflection system 11.
In a typical example, the initial beam is formed by the output beam
of a linear accelerator as collimated by collimator 17. As such,
the entrance beam will have a certain predetermined spot size and
will generally be non-monoenergetic, that is, there will be a
substantial spread in the momentum of the beam particles about the
reference momentum P.sub.0 of the particle defining the central
orbital axis 15. A typical momentum distribution of the particles
of the beam is shown in FIG. 5.
Each of the bending magnets 12-14 bends the central orbital axis
through a substantial bending angle, .alpha., as of 90.degree. and
of bending radius .rho., each followed by or separated by
rectilinear drift length portions 1.sub.1, 1.sub.2, 1.sub.3 and
1.sub.4.
A magnetic shunt structure 10, as of soft iron, is disposed in the
spaces between adjacent bending magnets 12-14 and along the central
orbital axis between the origin 16 and the first bending magnet 12
and between the last bending magnet 15 and the exit plane 18 at
which a beam target 19 is placed for interception of the electron
beam to generate an X-ray lobe 21 for treatment of the patient. The
X-ray energy passes through an X-ray transparent portion of a
vacuum envelope 22 defining an X-ray window of the X-ray therapy
machine.
The magnetic shunt structure 10, is provided with tunnel portions
23, see FIG. 2, to accommodate passage of the beam through the
shunt 10. The shunt 10 serves to provide a relatively magnetic
field free region in the spaces between the beam bending magnets
12, 13 and 14, and in the spaces between the beam entrance and beam
exit planes and the adjacent beam bending magnet structure.
The beam bending magnetic field regions are defined by the gaps
between respective pole pieces of magnets 12-14, as shown in FIG.
2, and are energized with magnetomotive force generated by an
electromagnetic coil structure split into two axially separated
halves 24 and 24' and disposed outside of the vacuum envelope 25
around a split magnetically permeable coil spacer structure 26 and
26' which in turn is closed on opposite sides by magnetically
permeable side return plates 27. The side return plates 27 are
interconnected at opposite ends via rear and front magnetic return
shunts 28 and 29, respectively, as of soft iron (see FIG. 1).
The magnetic deflection system 11 includes a plane of symmetry 31
normal to the bending plane and bisecting the total bending angle
.PSI. of the magnetic deflection system 11. Each of the bending
magnets 12-14 has a respective bending angle .alpha. and a radius
of curvature .rho. such radius of curvature being the radius of
curvature of the central orbital axis 15 within the gap of the
respective bending magnet 12-14.
It has been shown that the first-order beam optical properties of
any static magnetic beam deflection or transport system, possessing
a magnetic median plane of symmetry such as the bending plane, is
completely determined by specifying the trajectories of five
characteristic particles through the system 11. This is proven in
the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) report, No. 75 of
July 1967, titled "A First-and Second-Order Matrix Theory For The
Design Of Beam Transport Systems And Charged Particle
Spectrometers" by Karl L. Brown, and prepared under AEC Contract
AT(04-3)-515. These reference trajectories are identified by their
position, slope and momentum relative to a reference central
orbital axis trajectory that defines the beam optical axis of the
system, namely, the central orbital axis 15.
Central orbital axis 15 lies entirely within the median or bending
plane. If the momentum of the particle following the central
orbital axis is P.sub.0, then the five characteristic trajectories
are defined as follows:
s.sub.x is the path (trajectory) followed by a particle of momentum
P.sub.0 lying in the median bending plane on the central orbital
axis and diverging in the bending plane from the central orbital
axis with unity slope, where "unity slope" is defined in the
aforecited SLAC report 75;
c.sub.x is the trajectory followed by a particle of momentum
P.sub.0 lying in the median bending plane and having an initial
displacement in the bending plane normal to the central orbital
axis of unity with an initial slope relative to the orbital axis 15
of zero, i.e., parallel to the orbital axis;
d.sub.x is the trajectory of a particle initially coincident with
the central orbital axis but possessing a momentum of P.sub.0 +
.DELTA.P;
s.sub.y is the trajectory followed by a particle of momentum
P.sub.0 initially on the central orbital axis and having unity
slope relative thereto in the transverse plane normal to the
bending plane; and
c.sub.y is the trajectory followed by a particle of momentum
P.sub.0 having an initial displacement of unity in the transverse
direction from the central orbital axis and being initially
parallel to the central orbital axis.
It can be shown that, because of median plane (bending plane)
symmetry of the deflection system 11, the aforedescribed bending or
radial plane trajectories are decoupled from the transverse or y
plane trajectories, i.e., trajectories s.sub.x, c.sub.x and d.sub.x
are independent of trajectories s.sub.y and c.sub.y. The
aforedescribed five characteristic trajectories for the magnetic
deflection system 11 are shown in FIGS. 1, 3 and 4
respectively.
Referring now to FIG. 1 and considering the initially divergent
s.sub.x trajectory, it is desired in the magnetic deflection system
11 that the output beam, i.e., the deflected emergent beam at the
output plane 18 as focused onto the target 19, have the identically
same properties as the collimated input beam at the beam entrance
plane at the origin 16.
It has been proven in SLAC report 91, titled "TRANSPORT/360 A
Computer Program For Designing Charged Particle Beam Transport
Systems" prepared for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission under
Contract No. AT(04-3)-515, dated July 1970, at page A-45 that for
any place in the deflection system 11 where the two different types
of trajectories, namely, the cos like trajectories (c.sub.x,
c.sub.y) and sin like trajectories (s.sub.x, s.sub.y) are paired
for a given plane and related such that one type of trajectory is
experiencing a crossover of the orbital axis where the other type
of trajectory is parallel to the orbital axis, there will be a
waist in the beam for that particular plane, namely bending plane
(x-plane for the paired s.sub.x and c.sub.x terms) or transverse
plane (y-plane for the paired s.sub.y and c.sub.y term).
In the magnetic deflection system 11, it is desired to have a beam
waist in the bending plane of the beam at the mid-plane of symmetry
31. Accordingly the sin trajectory s.sub.x is deflected to a
crossover of the orbital axis 15 at the mid-plane of symmetry 31,
whereas the cos trajectory c.sub.x is focused through a crossover
at A and back into parallelism with the orbital axis 15 at the
mid-plane of symmetry 31. This allows a radial waist (waist in the
bending plane) at the mid-plane of symmetry 31.
The momentum dispersive trajectory d.sub.x (See FIG. 3) is focused
to parallelism with the orbital axis 15 at the mid-plane of
symmetry 31. This assures maximum momentum analysis since at the
mid-plane of symmetry 31 the momentum dispersive particles, i.e.,
particles with .DELTA.P from P.sub.0, will have maximum radial
displacement from the central orbital axis 15 and such displacement
will be proportional to .DELTA.P for the particular particle. This
combined with the radial waist for the non-momentum dispersive
s.sub.x and c.sub.x particles allows the placement of a momentum
defining slot 36 at the mid-plane of symmetry to achieve momentum
analysis of the beam for shaving off the tails of the momentum
distribution of the beam as more fully described below with regard
to FIGS. 5 and 6. This also places the momentum analyzer 36 at a
region remote from the target 19 such that X-rays emanating from
the analyzer are easily shielded from the X-ray treatment zone.
Referring now to FIG. 4 there is shown the desired trajectories
s.sub.y and c.sub.y in the transverse plane (y-plane) which is
transverse to the bending plane. As above stated, a waist in the
transverse plane occurs where one of the trajectories s.sub.y and
c.sub.y is parallel to the orbital axis while the other is crossing
over the orbital axis 15. A minimum magnetic gap width for the beam
deflection magnets 12, 13 and 14 will be achieved if a beam waist
in the transverse plane occurs at the midplane of symmetry 31.
Accordingly the sin term (s.sub.y) is focused to parallelism with
the orbital axis at the midplane 31 while the cos term (c.sub.y) is
focused to a crossover of the orbital axis 15 at the midplane of
symmetry 31.
The various parameters of the beam bending magnet system 11 are
chosen to achieve the aforedescribed trajectories s.sub.x c.sub.x,
d.sub.x, s.sub.y and c.sub.y as illustrated in FIGS. 1, 3 and 4.
More particularly, the conditions and parameters for the magnet
system 11 that must be fulfilled can be established by reference
solely to certain first-order monoenergetic trajectories traversing
the system 11.
First order beam optics may be expressed by the matrix
equation:
X(1) = RX(0) Eq. (1)
relating the positions and angles of an arbitrary trajectory
relative to a reference trajectory at any point in question, such
as an arbitrary point designated position (1), as a function of the
initial positions and angles of the trajectory at the origin (0) of
the system, i.e., at origin 16 herein designated (0). The
proposition of Equation (1) is known from the prior art, such as
the aforecited SLAC Report No. 75 or from an article by S. Penner
titled "Calculations of Properties of Magnetic Deflection Systems"
appearing in the Review of Scientific Instruments, Volume 32, No. 2
of February 1961, see pages 150-160.
Thus, at any specified position in the system 11, an arbitrary
charged particle is represented by a vector, i.e., a single column
matrix, X whose components are the positions, angles, and momentum
of the particle with respect to a specified reference trajectory,
for example the central orbital axis 15. Thus, ##SPC1##
where:
x = the radial displacement of the arbitrary trajectory with
respect to the assumed central orbital trajectory 15;
.theta. = the angle this arbitrary trajectory makes in the bending
plane with respect to the assumed central orbital trajectory
15;
y = the transverse displacement of the arbitrary trajectory in a
direction normal to the bending plane with respect to the assumed
central orbital trajectory 15;
.PHI. = the angular divergence of the arbitrary trajectory in the
transverse plane with respect to the assumed central trajectory
15;
l = the path length difference between the arbitrary trajectory and
the central orbital trajectory 15; and
.delta. = .DELTA.P/P.sub.0 and is the fractional momentum deviation
of the particle of the arbitrary trajectory from the assumed
central orbital trajectory 15.
In Equation (1), R is the matrix for the beam deflection system
between the initial (0) and final position (1), i.e., between
positions of the origin (0) and the point in question, position
(1). More particularly, the basic matrices for the various beam
deflecting components such as drift distance l, angle of rotation
.beta. of the input or output faces of the individual bending
magnets 12-14, and the bending angle .alpha. are as follows:
##SPC2##
Thus, the matrix R for the first bending magnet is given by
R.sub.BEND = (R.sub..sub..beta.2) (R.sub..sub..alpha.1)
(R.sub..sub..beta.1) where .beta..sub.1 is the angle of rotation of
the plane of the input face relative to the radius of the central
orbital axis at their point of intersection, and .beta..sub.2 is
the similarly defined angle of rotation of the output face of the
first bending magnet relative to the central orbital axis 15, as
shown in FIG. 1 and as defined by the abovecited Penner article at
FIG. 2 of page 153 and the abovecited SLAC report 91 at FIG. 748A15
of page 2-4. Likewise the matrix of the first half of the second
bending magnet is given by
R.sub.1/2 BEND = R.alpha..sub.2 R .beta..sub.3. Eq. (6)
where R.alpha..sub.2 is identical to R.alpha. of Eq. (5) except
that the values for .alpha. in Eq. (6B) are one half the valves of
.alpha. in Eq. (5).
Thus the matrix for the total system 11 to the symmetry plane 31 in
the bending plane is R.sub.Sym = (R.sub.1/2 BEND) (R.sub.l2)
(R.sub.BEND) (R.sub.l1).
The matrix R to the mid-plane of symmetry 31 is as follows:
##SPC3##
where the elements of the matrix comprise R(ij) where i refers to
the row and j to the column position in the matrix. Because of the
symmetry on opposite sides of the bending plane, the matrix R is
decoupled in the x (bending plane) and y (transverse) planes.
The matrix elements are related to the aforedescribed trajectories
as follows:
R(12) = s.sub.x ; R(11) = c.sub.x ; R(16) = d.sub.x ; R(34) =
s.sub.y ; and R(33) = c.sub.y.
Referring now to the matrix R.sub.Sym, Eq. (7) above, and to the
afordescribed preferred trajectories, at the mid-point of the
system, namely, at the symmetry plane 31 where intercepted by the
central orbital axis 15, R(16) (the spatial dispersion) d.sub.x is
a maximum in this design. At this same point R(12) = R(21) = 0,
namely s.sub.x is a crossover and the first derivative of c.sub.x
is zero, namely, parallel to the orbital axis 15. This corresponds
to a waist of the source, i.e., the collimator, thus permitting
momentum analysis of the beam at the mid-plane 31.
The preferred magnetic deflection system 11 is further
characterized by trajectory R(33) = R(44) = 0 at the mid-plane of
symmetry 31. Thus at the mid-point c.sub.y is focused to a
crossover of the orbital axis 15 while the first derivative of
s.sub.y is zero, i.e., s.sub.y ' = R(44) = 0, i.e., s.sub.y is
parallel to the orbital axis at the mid-plane of symmetry 31. This
assures a mid-plane waist in the transverse beam envelope, such
waist being independent of the initial phase space area of the
beam. Since the magnetic elements are symmetrical about the
mid-plane of symmetry 31 so is the beam envelope. When this
condition obtains at the mid-plane of the system, not only is
maximum transmission of the electron beam through the magnetic
deflection system assured, to the symmetry of the system assures
that both R(34) and R(43) terms are identically zero at the target
location 19. This is equivalent to stating that both the sine-like
term and the derivative of the cosine-like term are zero. These
conditions are precisely the conditions required for coincidence of
point-to-point focusing and for a waist, as has been shown in the
SLAC Report No. 91 aforecited.
At the end of the system, i.e., at the target 19, R(12) = R(34) = 0
meaning that point-to-point imaging occurs in both the radial and
the transverse planes that the final beam spot size is stable
relative to the input defining collimator 17. Furthermore,
.vertline.R(11).vertline.=.vertline.R(33).vertline.=.vertline.1.vertline.
assuring unity magnification of the initial beam spot size.
Considering angular dispersion of the beam, by requiring the
derivative of the dispersion R(26) term to go to zero at the
mid-plane 31 of the system 11, both the dispersion term R(16) and
its derivative R(26) are zero at the output. This is the necessary
and sufficient condition that the system be achromatic.
Thus, from the above discussion it has been shown that in the
preferred magnetic deflection system 11, the following matrix
elements should all have zero value at the mid-plane of symmetry
31. In other words, R(12) = R(21) = R(26) = R(33) = R(44) = 0. This
statement comprises five simultaneous matrix equations and at least
five unknowns, namely, .alpha., l.sub.1, .beta..sub.1,
.beta..sub.2, l.sub.2 and .beta..sub.3. In the preferred magnetic
deflection system 11 of the present invention, .beta..sub.1 is
equal to .beta..sub.2 which is equal to .beta..sub.3 and
.alpha..sub.1 equals .alpha..sub.2 equals .alpha..sub.3.
The aforecited five simultaneous matrix equations can be solved by
hand. However, this is a very tedious process and a more acceptable
alternative is to solve the five simultaneous equations by means of
a general purpose computer programmed for that purpose. A suitable
program is one designated by the name TRANSPORT. A copy of the
program, run onto one's own magnetic tape is available upon request
and the appropriate backup documentation is available to the public
by sending requests to the Program Librarian, Linda Lorenzetti, at
SLAC, P.O. Box 4349, Stanford, Calif. 94305. The aforecited SLAC
Report No. 91 is a manual describing how to prepare data for the
TRANSPORT computation, and this manual is available to the public
from the Reports Distribution Office at SLAC, P.O. Box 4349,
Stanford, Calif. 94305.
In designing the magnetic deflection system 11 of the present
invention, the fringing effects of the various bending magnets
should be taken into account. More particularly, the effective
input and output faces of the bending magnet do not occur at the
boundary of the region of uniform field but extend outwardly of the
uniform field region by a finite amount. The effective boundary is
depicted as d.sub.1 in FIGS. 8 and 9 and is that point where the
cross hatched area A.sub.1 of FIG. 9 is equal to the cross hatched
area A.sub.2. Area A.sub.1 is that region of the plot between the
actual magnetic field strength line 35 and that value of uniform
magnetic field strength B.sub.0 in the gap of the bending magnet 14
and area A.sub.2 is that cross hatched area lying under the
magnetic field intensity curve 35 between the effective boundary
d.sub.1 and the point at which the magnetic fringing field goes to
zero amplitude. The K.sub.1 coefficient in the pole face rotation
matrix, shown at page 2-3 of the SLAC Report No. 91, takes into
account the effective boundary of the bending magnet to compensate
for the fringing field. In a clamped magnet of the type shown in
FIGS. 1-4, the typical value for K.sub.1 is approximately 0.4 as
indicated at page 16-5 of the aforecited SLAC Report No. 91.
Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6 there is shown the momentum
distribution of the typical output beam of the collimated linear
electron accelerator. As previously pointed out above, the magnetic
deflection system 11 of FIGS. 1-4 serves to provide a momentum
analysis of the beam at the plane of symmetry 31. Accordingly, an
energy selection slit 36 is preferably provided at the plane of
symmetry for shaving from the momentum distribution of FIG. 5 the
tails thereof, whereby the momentum distribution of the final beam
as focused onto the target 19 is more nearly monoenergetic as
contrasted with the beam at the output of the collimator 17. As
shown in FIG. 6, the momentum analysis slit 36 comprises a pair of
beam shaving vanes 37 and 38 radially displaced from the central
orbital axis 15 by predetermined amounts for shaving the respective
high and high momentum tails from the momentum analyzed beam. As
can be seen by reference to FIGS. 5 and 6, most of the momentum
tail occurs at the low momentum side of the distribution and, thus
if desired, only one of the momentum selection vane members 37 may
be employed as desired for stopping the low momentum particles. The
X-rays emanating from the momentum selection slit 36 are easily
shielded from the patient and target 19, as the lobe of X-rays
generated by such interception of the beam tends to be directed in
a substantially different direction than that of the desired X-ray
lobe 21.
Referring now to FIG. 7 there is shown the magnetic deflection
system 11 as typically employed in an X-ray therapy machine 39.
More particularly, the therapy machine 39 comprises a generally
C-shaped rotatable gantry 41 rotatable about an axis of revolution
42 in the horizontal direction. The gantry 41 is supported from the
floor 43 via a pedestal 44 having a trunnion 45 for rotatably
supporting the gantry 41. The gantry 41 includes a pair of
generally horizontally directed parallel arms 46 and 47. A linear
electron accelerator 48 is housed within arm 47 and a magnetic
deflection system 11 and target 19 are disposed at the outer end of
the horizontal arm 47 for projecting a beam of X-rays between the
outer end of the arm 47 and an X-ray absorbing element 49 carried
at the outer end of the other horizontal arm 46. The patient 51 is
supported from couch 52 in the lobe of X-rays for therapeutic
treatment.
Advantages of the magnetic deflection system 11 of the present
invention include achromatic beam deflection through a substantial
angle such that the collimated electron beam is imaged at the
target 19 without incurring either spacial or angular dispersion
nor a significant increase in spot size. In addition, the beam
deflection system 11 is compact and greatly simplified by employing
three identical beam bending magnets. The gap requirements of the
beam bending magnet system are reduced by the provision of a
parallel-to-point focus in the transverse plane at the plane of
symmetry 31.
Although, as thus far described, the total bending angle .PSI. of
the beam deflection system 11, as previously illustrated, is
270.degree. this is not a requirement of the present invention.
Other bending angles are also possible employing the techniques of
the present invention. Having all of the beam bending magnets 12-14
bending the beam in the same sense is an important feature of this
invention, but the use of three magnets is not an essential
feature. For example, the second magnet 13 may be split into two
magnets with a drift space in between and with the plane of
symmetry passing through the added drift space. This alternative
construction would facilitate placement of the momentum selection
slit 36.
In a typical magnetic deflection system 11 for bending a beam of
electrons from the collimated output of a linear accelerator onto a
target 19, the magnetic field strength and accelerator output beam
central momentum P.sub.0 are chosen such that the central orbital
axis 15 has a radius of curvature .rho. of 1.97" and the magnetic
deflection system parameters meeting the aforecited reference
trajectories s.sub.x, c.sub.x, s.sub.y, c.sub.y, d.sub.x have the
following values: l.sub.1 = l.sub.4 = 1.53 inches, .beta..sub.1-6 =
13.2.degree., l.sub.2 = l.sub.3 = 3.06 inches, K = 0.4,
.alpha..sub.1-3 = 90.degree., magnet gap width = 0.22 inch.
Although the preferred position for the momentum analysis slit 36
is at the mid-plane of symmetry 31, the slit 36 can also be placed
in between adjacent beam bending magnets, i.e., between magnets 12
and 13 or between magnets 13 and 14. The resolving power of the
slit 36 is reduced somewhat in this position but physical
realization of the slit 36 is facilitated.
* * * * *