Process For Oil Demetalation And Desulfurization With Cobalt-molybdenum Impregnated Magnesium Aluminate Spinel

Fischer , et al. February 18, 1

Patent Grant 3867282

U.S. patent number 3,867,282 [Application Number 05/455,442] was granted by the patent office on 1975-02-18 for process for oil demetalation and desulfurization with cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel. This patent grant is currently assigned to Mobil Oil Corporation. Invention is credited to Julius Ciric, Ronald H. Fischer, Thaddeus E. Whyte, Jr..


United States Patent 3,867,282
Fischer ,   et al. February 18, 1975
**Please see images for: ( Certificate of Correction ) **

PROCESS FOR OIL DEMETALATION AND DESULFURIZATION WITH COBALT-MOLYBDENUM IMPREGNATED MAGNESIUM ALUMINATE SPINEL

Abstract

A catalyst composition is provided which comprises a cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel having a surface area of greater than about 50m.sup.2 /g and a pore volume of greater than about 0.3 cc/g. Also provided is a process for demetalation and desulfurization of oil stock which comprises contacting said oil stock in the presence of hydrogen with a catalytically effective amount of said cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel at a temperature of from about 600.degree.F to about 1,000.degree.F and a liquid hourly space velocity of from about 0.1 to about 2.


Inventors: Fischer; Ronald H. (Cherry Hill, NJ), Ciric; Julius (Pitman, NJ), Whyte, Jr.; Thaddeus E. (Cherry Hill, NJ)
Assignee: Mobil Oil Corporation (New York, NY)
Family ID: 23808826
Appl. No.: 05/455,442
Filed: March 27, 1974

Current U.S. Class: 208/216PP; 208/251H; 208/216R
Current CPC Class: B01J 23/882 (20130101); B01J 35/10 (20130101); B01J 35/1042 (20130101); B01J 35/1061 (20130101); B01J 35/1047 (20130101); B01J 35/1038 (20130101); C10G 2300/107 (20130101); B01J 35/1019 (20130101)
Current International Class: B01J 23/882 (20060101); B01J 23/76 (20060101); C10G 45/02 (20060101); B01J 35/00 (20060101); B01J 35/10 (20060101); C10G 45/08 (20060101); C10g 023/02 ()
Field of Search: ;208/216,217,213,251H

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
2781295 February 1957 Teter et al.
2840512 June 1958 Burton et al.
2853429 September 1958 Gislon et al.
Primary Examiner: Gantz; Delbert E.
Assistant Examiner: Crasanakis; G. J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Huggett; Charles A. Barclay; Raymond W. Santini; Dennis P.

Claims



1. A process for demetalation and desulfurization of an oil stock which comprises contacting said oil stock with hydrogen and with a cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel at a temperature of from about 600.degree.F to about 1,000.degree.F, a pressure of from about 1,000 psig to about 3,000 psig and a liquid hourly space velocity of from about 0.1 to about 2, said spinel having a surface area of greater than about 50 m.sup.2 /g and a pore volume of greater than about 0.3 cc/g.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature is from about 675.degree.F to about 800.degree.F, the pressure is from about 1,800 psig to about 3,000 psig and the liquid hourly space velocity is from about

3. The process of claim 1 wherein said oil stock is a residual oil comprising a total nickel and vanadium content of between about 1 ppm and

4. The process of claim 3 wherein the temperature is from about 675.degree.F to about 800.degree.F, the pressure is from about 1,800 psig to about 3,000 psig and the liquid hourly space velocity is from about

5. The process of claim 3 wherein said residual oil comprises a total

6. The process of claim 5 wherein the temperature is from about 675.degree.F to about 800.degree.F, the pressure is from about 1,800 psig to about 3,000 psig and the liquid hourly space velocity is from about

7. The process of claim 1 wherein said oil stock is a high boiling range

8. The process of claim 7 wherein the temperature is from about 675.degree.F to about 800.degree.F, the pressure is from about 1,800 psig to about 3,000 psig and the liquid hourly space velocity is from about

9. The process of claim 1 wherein said oil stock includes components

10. The process of claim 9 wherein the temperature is from about 675.degree.F to about 800.degree.F, the pressure is from about 1,800 psig to about 3,000 psig and the liquid hourly space velocity is from about

11. The process of claim 1 wherein said oil stock is a crude oil comprising a total nickel and vanadium content of between about 1/2 ppm and about 75

12. The process of claim 11 wherein the temperature is from about 675.degree.F to about 800.degree.F, the pressure is from about 1,800 psig to about 3,000 psig and the liquid hourly space velocity is from about

13. The process of claim 1 wherein said cobalt and molybdenum impregnated

14. The process of claim 13 wherein said cobalt oxide comprises from about 1 to about 5 weight percent of said cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel and said molybdenum oxide comprises from about 8 to about 20 weight percent of said cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel.
Description



BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to a catalyst composition and process for demetalation and desulfurization of oil stock, e.g. residua. More particularly, it relates to a catalyst composition of cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel and a process for residua demetalation and desulfurization which comprises contacting said residua with said catalyst of cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel in the presence of hydrogen.

2. Description of Prior Art

Residual petroleum oil fractions containing relatively high proportions of metals, such as those heavy fractions produced by atmospheric and vacuum crude distillation columns, would represent excellent charge stocks for a cracking process were it not for their high metals content. Principal metal contaminants are nickel and vanadium, with iron and copper also sometimes present. Additionally, trace amounts of zinc and sodium may be present. Since these metals, when present in crude oil, are associated with very large hydrocarbon molecules, the heavier fractions produced by crude distillation contain substantially all the metals present in the crude, such metals being particularly concentrated in the asphaltene residual fraction. The metal contaminants are typically large organo-metallic complexes such as metal porphyrins.

At present, cracking operations are performed on petroleum fractions lighter than residua fractions. Typical cracking charge stocks are coker and/or crude unit gas oil, vacuum tower overhead, etc., the feedstock having an API gravity range of between about 15 and about 45. Since these charge stocks are lighter than residual hydrocarbon fractions, such residual fractions being characterized as having an API gravity of less than about 25, they do not contain significant proportions of the heavy and large molecules in which the metals are concentrated.

When metals are present in a cracking unit charge stock, such metals are deposited on the cracking catalyst. The metals act as a catalyst poison and greatly decrease the efficiency of the cracking process by altering the catalyst so that it promotes increased hydrogen production.

Sulfur is also undesirable in a cracking unit charge stock. The sulfur contributes to corrosion of the unit's mechanical equipment and creates difficulties in treating products and flue gases. At typical cracking conversion rates, about one-half of the sulfur charge to such a unit is converted to H.sub.2 S gas which must be removed from the gasoline product, usually by scrubbing with an amine stream. A large portion of the remaining sulfur is deposited on the cracking catalyst itself. When the catalyst is regenerated, at least a portion of this sulfur is oxidized to form SO.sub.2 or SO.sub.3 gas which must be removed from the flue gas which is normally discharged into the atmosphere.

In the past, high molecular weight, e.g. residual, stocks containing sulfur and metals have often been processed in a cokerto effectively remove metals and also some of the sulfur. However, there are limits to the amount of metals and sulfur which can be tolerated in the product coke if it is to be marketable. Hence, there is a considerable need to develop economically practicable means for effecting the removal and recovery of metallic and sulfur contaminants from high boiling fractions of petroleum oils so that conversion of such contaminated oils to more desirable product may be effectively accomplished. The present application is particularly concerned with the removal of metal and sulfur contaminants from residua.

It has been proposed to improve the salability of high sulfur and metal content residual-containing petroleum oils by a variety of hydroprocessing methods, e.g. hydrodesulfurization and hydrometalation. However, difficulty has been experienced in achieving a commercially feasible catalytic hydroprocessing process. Short catalyst life in such processes is manifested by inability of a catalyst to maintain a relatively high capability for desulfurizing charge stock with increasing quantities of coke and/or metallic contaminants deposited thereon which act as catalyst poisons. Satisfactory catalyst life can be obtained relatively easily with distillate oils, but is especially difficult to obtain in desulfurizing residual oils, since the asphaltenic or porphyrinic components of an oil, which tend to form disproportionate amounts of coke, are concentrated in the residual fractions of a petroleum oil, and since a relatively high proportion of the metallic contaminants that normally tend to poison catalysts are commonly found in the asphaltene components of the oil. Further, on a commercial scale, these processes are rather costly due to high hydrogen consumption levels. It is, therefore, advantageous to provide a demetalation/desulfurization process such as the present invention which exhibits superior demetalation characteristics, good desulfurization benefits, low hydrogen consumption and satisfactory ageing properties.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,716,479 and 3,772,185 propose demetalation of a hydrogen charge stock by contacting the charge stock with added hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst material derived from a manganese nodule.

British Pat. Nos. 1,318,941 and 1,318,942 teach use of zinc, magnesium, beryllium of calcium aluminate spinels combined, after calcination, with a Group VIII metal, such as, for example, platinum, as a dehydrogenation catalyst.

Demetalation of hydrocarbon fractions is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 2,902,429 as contacting said fractions with a catalyst having a relatively small amount of a sulfur-resistant hydrogenation-dehydrogenation component disposed on a low surface area carrier, i.e. a carrier with a surface area of not more than 15m.sup.2 /g, and preferably not more than about 3m.sup.2 /g. Examples of such low surface area carriers include diatomaceous earth, natural clays and Alundum.

There are numerous references in the art showing various metals combined with carriers such as alumina, silica, zirconia or titania as catalysts for use in demetalation and/or desulfurization processes. No references are known to the applicants which teach the present invention with its attendant benefits.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, an oil stock, e.g. residua, is demetalized and desulfurized by contacting it in the presence of hydrogen with a particular porous solid material catalyst identified as a magnesium aluminate spinel having a relatively high surface area and pore volume and having impregnated thereon both cobalt and molybdenum, at a temperature of from about 600.degree.F to about 1,000.degree.F and a liquid hourly space velocity of from about 0.1 to about 2.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The process of the present invention comprises contacting an oil stock, e.g. residua, with a particular specified catalyst in the presence of hydrogen to produce an upgraded demetalized and desulfurized oil.

The oil stock which may be treated in accordance with this invention may generally be any residual oil comprising a total nickel and vanadium content of between about 1 ppm and about 150 ppm, or, more usually, between about 1 ppm and about 60 ppm. Said oil stock may also be found to be a high boiling range residual oil boiling above about 400.degree.F. Such oil stock may include components obtained by, for example, fractionation, such as atmospheric or vacuum crude distillation, of crude oils. Non-limiting examples of said crude oils are Pennsylvania, Midcontinent, Gulf Coast, West Texas, Amal, Agha Jari, Kuwait, Barco, Arabian and others. Said oil stock may be one having a substantial portion thereof of the fractionation product of one or more of the above mentioned crude oils mixed with other oil stocks.

It is further observed that the present process may be effectively utilized for crude oil demetalation and desulfurization whens aid crude oil comprises a total nickel and vanadium content of between about 1/2 ppm and about 75 ppm. Also, the oil stock to be treated in accordance herewith may be comprised of a portion of an above defined crude oil with a portion of an above defined residua oil.

The catalyst material of the present invention is a cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel having a surface area of greater than about 50 m.sup.2 /g and up to about 300 m.sup.2 /g and higher and a pore volume of greater than about 0.3 cc/g and up to about 1.3 cc/g and higher.

The impregnated cobalt and molybdenum may be in the salt or oxide form or in elemental form with little or no effect upon the efficiency of the present process. The preferred form, however, is the oxide form of cobalt and molybdenum with the impregnated catalyst being comprised of from about 1 to about 5 weight percent cobalt oxide (CoO) and from about 8 to about 20 weight percent molybdenum oxide (MoO.sub.3). A particularly preferred composition would have from about 2 to about 4 weight percent CoO and from about 10 to about 15 weight percent MoO.sub.3.

These catalyst materials may be made according to procedures well known in the art (exemplified hereinafter) and may be, if desired, dehydrated, at least partially, before use in the present process. Such dehydration can be accomplished by heating to a temperature in the range of 200.degree. to 600.degree.C in an inert atmosphere, such as air, nitrogen, etc. and at atmospheric or subatmospheric pressures for between 1 and 48 hours. Dehydration can also be performed at lower temperatures merely by placing the catalyst in a vacuum, but a longer time is required to obtain a like degree of dehydration under the latter conditions.

The operating parameters in the present process are critical to achieving the desired results of degrees of demetalation and desulfurization of the oil stock being treated thereby without substantial loss in yield. For example, the liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) required for the instant invention is from about 0.1 to about 2, with a preferred range of from about 0.25 to about 1. The temperature of the present demetalation/desulfurization process must be within the range of from about 600.degree.F to about 1,000.degree.F, with a preferred temperature range of from about 675.degree.F to about 800.degree.F. The pressure of the reaction system of the present process must be between about 1,000 psig and about 3,000 psig, with a preferred pressure range being from about 1,800 psig to about 3,000 psig.

In order to more fully illustrate the process of the present invention, the following specific examples, which in no sense limit the invention, are presented.

EXAMPLE 1

A quantity of magnesium aluminate spinel was prepared by the following method:

Into a 1000 ml. two-neck flask, equipped with a reflux condenser and septum, was added 500 ml. anhydrous methanol and 12.2 grams of magnesium metal. The resulting reaction was complete in about 3 hours.

Into a 3,000 ml. four-neck flask, equipped with a heating mantle, stirrer, check valve and septum, was added 204 grams of aluminum isopropoxide and 1,500 ml. of isopropanol. This mixture was heated and stirred until nearly all of the isopropoxide was dissolved.

While the stirring was continued in the 3,000 ml. flask, it and the 1,000 ml. flask were connected by means of syringe needles and plastic small-bore tubing.

The reflux condenser on the 1,000 ml. flask was then replaced with a septum, into which a syringe needle was placed, said needle being connected to a source of nitrogen pressure. Nitrogen pressure was then applied so that the contents of the 1,000 ml. flask was transferred to the 3,000 ml. flask. This was accomplished in a way that heat evolution and boiling were kept at a minimum. Heating and stirring of the total contents of the 3,000 ml. flask was then continued for about 2-3 hours.

The contents of the 3,000 ml. flask were then cooled and the precipitate was filtered and spread on a paper. The alkoxide was in this manner allowed to hydrolyze in air moisture for 2-3 days.

The solid material product was then calcined in a furnace programmed for a temperature increase of 1.degree.C per minute. It was kept at 650.degree.C for two days, resulting in a lumped form (-10/+20 mesh) of magnesium aluminate spinel having a surface area of about 150 m.sup.2 /g.

A solution of 11.3 grams of Co(NO.sub.3).6H.sub.2 O in 40 cc of water was brought in contact with 100 grams of the above spinel under vacuum. After 10 minutes of contact, the resulting product was dried in a vacuum oven at 230.degree.F overnight. The resulting dried product was then contacted with a solution of 13.6 grams of (NH.sub.4).sub.2 MoO.sub.3 in 40 cc of water under vacuum. Again, the resulting product was dried in a vacuum oven at 230.degree.F overnight. The dried product was then calcined for 8 hours at 1,000.degree.F, giving a lumped form (-10/+20 mesh) of cobaltmolybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel having the following properties determined by chemical and physical analysis:

MoO.sub.3, wt. % = 10.20 CoO, wt. % = 3.24 Ni, wt. % = 0.03 V, wt. % = < 0.01 Fe, wt. % = 0.04 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % = 59.2 SiO.sub.2, wt. % = < 0.1 Ash, wt. % = 99.3 Surface Area, m.sup.2 /g = 124 Real Density = 3.27 Particle Density = 0.678 Pore Volume, cc/g = 1.169 Pore Size Distribution in Angstrom Units ______________________________________ < 30 30-50 50-100 100-200 200-300 >300 4% 2% 9% 9% 6% 70% ______________________________________

EXAMPLE 2

A quantity of magnesium aluminate spinel was prepared as in Example 1 except that it was extruded as a 1/32 inch extrudate prior to calcination. The extruded spinel was then impregnated with cobalt-molybdenum as in Example 1 giving an extruded form (1/32 inch extrudate) of cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel having the following properties:

MoO.sub.3, wt. % = 11.50 CoO, wt. % = 4.20 Ni, wt. % = 0.03 V, wt. % = <0.01 Fe, wt. % = 0.04 Mg, wt. % = 12.1 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % = 62.9 Ash, wt. % = 96.3 Surface Area, m.sup.2 /g = 206 Real Density = 3.44 Particle Density = 1.23 Pore Volume, cc/g = 0.622 Pore Size Distribution in Angstrom Units ______________________________________ <30 30-50 50-100 100-200 200-300 >300 21% 17% 29% 12% 7% 15% ______________________________________

EXAMPLe 3

The cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel materials prepared in Examples 1 and 2, along with two commercially available resid processing catalyst materials, hereinafter described, were tested for comparison purposes in a laboratory test simulating a standard fixed bed resid hydrodesulfurization process. The catalyst materials being tested were each evaluated in said test in a short-term, i.e. 10 days on stream, run using Kuwait atmospheric resid which had a sulfur content of 3.54 weight percent and a total vanadium and nickel content of 54 ppm (hereinafter "Resid X"), or a sulfur content of 3.56 weight percent and a total vanadium and nickel content of 51 ppm (hereinafter "Resid Y"). Test conditions such as temperature, pressure, liquid hourly space velocity and hydrogen circulation are listed in Table I hereinafter.

Properties of the two commercially available catalysts, designated "catalyst A" and "catalyst B," are listed below:

Property Catalyst A Catalyst B ______________________________________ MoO.sub.3, wt. % 13.40 12.10 CoO, wt. % 3.40 3.54 Ni, wt. % 0.18 0.04 V, wt. % <0.01 <0.01 Fe, wt. % 0.06 0.06 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, wt. % 82.7 85.2 SiO.sub.2, wt. % 4.91 1.69 Surface Area, m.sup.2 /g 286 268 Particle Density 1.28 1.374 Real Density 3.42 3.644 Pore Volume, cc/g 0.491 0.453 Pore Size Distribution in Angstrom Units <30 7% 7% 30-50 28% 34% 50-100 62% 56% 100-200 1% 1% 200-300 0% 0% >300 2% 2% ______________________________________

The results of the test are recorded in Table I.

TABLE I __________________________________________________________________________ Catalyst Example 1 (with Resid X) Example 2 (with Resid Y) __________________________________________________________________________ Operating Conditions Temperature, .degree.F. 700 750 800 800 674 724 775 675 724 774 Pressure, psig. 2000 2000 2000 1000 2000 2000 2000 1000 1000 1000 LHSV, V (oil)/hr/ 0.70 0.72 0.71 0.24 0.74 0.74 0.75 0.39 0.39 0.40 V(catalyst) Hydrogen Circulation, 4013 3756 3562 3877 4703 4223 3883 4296 3993 3525 SCF/B. Hydrogen Consumption, 302 568 743 872 306 506 735 293 432 566 SCF/B. Yield of C.sub.5.sup.+, wt. % 98.4 97.8 96.3 94.1 97.8 97.0 95.8 97.7 96.9 95.4 Properties of Yield Sulfur, wt. % 1.86 1.18 0.56 0.51 1.58 0.81 0.32 1.58 0.96 0.44 % Desulfurization 48.3 67.4 84.8 86.5 55.6 77.2 91.0 55.6 73.0 87.6 Nickel, ppm 5.0 1.6 0.3 0.4 5.0 2.3 0.1 5.3 2.6 0.2 Vanadium, ppm 8.4 1.2 0.3 0.2 13.0 5.1 0.1 13.0 5.6 0.1 % Demetalation 75 95 99 99 65 86 99+ 64 84 99 __________________________________________________________________________ Catalyst Catalyst A (with Resid Y) Catalyst B (with Resid __________________________________________________________________________ X) Operating Conditions Temperature, .degree.F. 676 725 774 676 727 776 700 750 800 Pressure, psig. 2000 2000 2000 1000 1000 1000 2000 2000 2000 LHSV 0.74 0.72 0.74 0.38 0.41 0.40 0.75 0.75 0.75 Hydrogen Circulation, SCF/B. 4437 3649 3669 4523 3126 4129 5000 5000 5000 Hydrogen Consumption, SCF/B. 336 599 1154 260 486 711 459 759 880 Yield of C.sub.5.sup.+, wt. % 97.3 96.9 96.5 97.0 96.5 94.8 98.2 97.5 96.2 Properties of Yield Sulfur, wt. % 1.18 0.62 0.40 1.04 0.48 0.34 .91 .53 .45 % Desulfurization 66.8 82.6 88.8 70.8 86.5 90.4 74.3 85.0 87.3 Nickel, ppm 7.0 5.9 3.5 8.9 5.4 3.6 7.3 5.4 3.7 Vanadium, ppm 20.0 16.0 8.4 23.0 14.0 9.2 20 14 10 % Demetalation 47 57 77 37 62 75 49 64 80 __________________________________________________________________________

EXAMPLES 4-7

A quantity of magnesium aluminate spinel (Example 4) and a quantity of cobalt-molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel (Example 5) were prepared as in Example 1. Further, a quantity of platinum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel (Example 6) and a quantity of molybdenum impregnated magnesium aluminate spinel (Example 7) were prepared for comparison as follows:

Material of Example 6

A 100 gram quantity of the spinel of Example 4 was washed with 150 cc of 1:10 acetic acid:acetone mixture, followed by washing with acetone. It was then suspended in 200 cc of acetone and 1.3 grams of H.sub.2 PtCl.sub.6.6H.sub.2 O dissolved in 25 cc of acetone was slowly added to the suspension. After 15 minutes, the acetone of the total suspension was driven off slowly by carefully heating it on a hot plate. The final product was dried for 8 hours at 250.degree.F and calcined for 8 hours at 1,050.degree.F.

Material of Example 7

A 13.6 gram quantity of (NH.sub.4).sub.2 MoO.sub.3 dissolved in 40cc of water was mixed with 100 grams of the spinel of Example 4 under vacuum. The resulting product was dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 230.degree.F and calcined for 8 hours at 1,000.degree.F.

EXAMPLE 8

A Shaker Bomb test under severe resid hydrotreating conditions was conducted using the catalyst materials of Examples 4-7 wherein a batch-type reaction vessel was filled with catalyst material, oil (Resid X, hereinbefore defined) and hydrogen and brought quickly to the desired temperature and pressure (see Table II) while being agitated at 200 rpm. The particular Shaker Bomb apparatus used is described fully by J. W. Payne et al. in Industiral and Engineering Chemistry, volume 50, 1958, page 47. The test conditions and results are summarized in Table II.

It is readily observed from the data presented in Table II that the catalyst for use in the present invention, i.e. Example 5, provides substantially better demetalation and desulfurization than other similar but different catalyst compositions, i.e. Examples 4, 6 and 7.

TABLE II __________________________________________________________________________ Catalyst Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 __________________________________________________________________________ Operating Conditions Temperature, .degree.F. 800 800 700 800 Pressure, psig 2000 2000 2000 2000 Oil/Catalyst, weight ratio 20 20 20 20 Properties of Yield Gravity, .degree.API 26.1 28.4 13.9 25.0 Viscosity, KV.sub.100 8.25 12.13 -- -- Sulfur, wt. % 2.66 0.81 3.14 1.89 Hydrogen, wt. % 11.60 12.40 11.25 11.90 Nickel, ppm 4.2 0.4 -- 2.4 Vanadium, ppm 16.0 0.3 -- 5.3 % Desulfurization 28 78 13 49 % Demetalation 62 99 -- 87 __________________________________________________________________________

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed