U.S. patent number 3,867,191 [Application Number 05/228,953] was granted by the patent office on 1975-02-18 for carbon-boron surfaced carbon filament.
This patent grant is currently assigned to United Aircraft Corporation. Invention is credited to Francis S. Galasso, Richard D. Veltri.
United States Patent |
3,867,191 |
Galasso , et al. |
February 18, 1975 |
Carbon-boron surfaced carbon filament
Abstract
A high strength composite filament suitable for use as a
reinforcement in metal matrices comprises a filamentary carbon
substrate having a continuous essentially amorphous carbon alloy
coating adhered thereto, the coating consisting essentially of
approximately 43-60 atomic percent carbon, remainder boron.
Inventors: |
Galasso; Francis S.
(Manchester, CT), Veltri; Richard D. (Hartford, CT) |
Assignee: |
United Aircraft Corporation
(East Hartford, CT)
|
Family
ID: |
22859231 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/228,953 |
Filed: |
February 24, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
428/389;
428/401 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C22C
49/14 (20130101); Y10T 428/298 (20150115); Y10T
428/2958 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
C22C
49/14 (20060101); C22C 49/00 (20060101); C23c
011/08 () |
Field of
Search: |
;117/16R,16C,107.1,228,17ZR,115,111,DIG.10,DIG.11,169R
;161/141,143,170,175 ;313/341 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Van Horn; Charles E.
Assistant Examiner: Massie; J. W.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Del Ponti; John D.
Claims
1. A composite filament at least two mils in diameter having a
tensile strength of at least 150,000 psi for use as reinforcement
in metal matrix composite articles comprising:
a substrate consisting essentially of carbon filament;
a continuous coating adhered to said substrate consisting
essentially of carbon-boron alloy, said coating consisting
essentially of approximately
2. The composite filament of claim 1 wherein said carbon
filamentary substrate is at least one mil in diameter and said
carbon-boron alloy
3. The composite filament of claim 1 wherein said alloy coating
consists essentially of approximately 43-55 atomic percent carbon,
remainder boron.
4. The composite filament of claim 1 wherein said alloy coating
consists essentially of approximately 48 atomic percent carbon,
remainder boron.
5. The composite filament of claim 3 wherein said carbon
filamentary substrate is at least one mil in diameter and said
carbon-boron alloy
6. The composite filament of claim 4 wherein said carbon
filamentary substrate is at least one mil in diameter and said
carbon-boron alloy coating is at least approximately 1/2 mil thick.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the evolution of filamentary composites, the development of high
modulus, high strength carbon yarns has evoked considerable
interest. The major utility for these fibers for reinforcement,
however, has been limited to the nonmetal, i.e., resin, matrix
materials. Commercially available carbon and graphite fibers which
exhibit high tensile strength (over 150,000 psi) and Young's
Modulus (over 20 .times. 10.sup.6 psi) are typically less than 10
microns in diameter and are well suited for use as reinforcement
for the resin matrices. It is recognized, however, that the
incorporation of metals into oriented carbon fibers imposes a more
stringent set of requirements than does resin impregnation.
In order to effectively utilize carbon filament as reinforcement in
metal matrix material, a relatively large diameter carbon fiber,
coated with a diffusion barrier, is necessary. One of the paramount
problems in obtaining carbon filament-reinforced metal matrix
composites of acceptable properties can be attributed to the small
size of the reinforcing carbon fibers. To achieve the maximum
strengthening effect in a fiber-reinforced article, it is necessary
to utilize filaments having a diameter substantially greater than
the presently available 10 micron carbon fibers and more
particularly having a final diameter greater than approximately 2
mils. It will be appreciated that filaments smaller than 2 mils,
such as the 10 .mu. carbon fibers, for example, present problems in
proper and complete matrix infiltration, susceptibility to chemical
attack and lack of resistance to compressive forces normal to their
axes. To offset the effects of reactivity between the fiber and the
metal matrix material, it is necessary to provide a barrier coating
without, however, degrading the structural properties of the
substrate filament.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to carbon-base filaments and, more
particularly, to carbon-base monofilaments at least two mils in
diameter suitable for use as reinforcement for metal matrix
composites.
The present invention contemplates the production of a high
strength, high modulus composite filament comprising a carbon
filamentary core at least one mil in diameter, preferably 1 to 2
mils in diameter, having an adherent continuous essentially
amorphous coating consisting essentially of a carbon-boron alloy
consisting of approximately 43-60 atomic percent carbon, remainder
boron. It has been found that such a carbon-boron alloy coating
composition, to a thickness of approximately 1/2 - 2 mils, will not
only provide a diffusion barrier to the carbon and metal matrix
materials but, in addition, will impart high strength and modulus
thereto.
The present invention also contemplates the method for making such
a filament and, in general, comprises continuously passing a carbon
filament through a reactor, heating the filament to 1050.degree. -
1250.degree.C and exposing the heated filament to a reactant gas
mixture consisting essentially of methane, boron trichloride and
hydrogen, the mass flow ratios of methane/boron trichloride and
hydrogen/boron trichloride being 1.16 to 8.08 and 0.5 to 2.0
respectively.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
An understanding of the invention will become more apparent to
those skilled in the art by reference to the following detailed
description when viewed in light of the accompanying drawings,
wherein:
FIG. 1 is a simple sketch, taken in elevation, of apparatus used in
the production of the carbon-boron alloy coating of the carbon
filaments of the present invention; and
FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view through one of the
filaments of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
As seen in FIG. 1, the carbon-boron alloy coating is produced on a
resistively heated carbon monofilament 4 which is drawn downwardly
through a reactor 6 comprising a tubular containment vessel 8,
having a gas inlet 10 at the upper end of the reactor and a single
exhaust port 12 at the lower end thereof. A reactant gas mixture
consisting essentially of methane, boron trichloride and hydrogen
is fed to the reactor through inlet 10. The containment vessel may
be formed of Pyrex, although a number of other materials including
Vycor and quartz will be found satisfacotry. The gas inlet 10 and
the exhaust 12 penetrate and are electrically connected to the
metallic end plugs 14 and 16 which provide the end closures for the
containment vessel and also provide convenient means by which power
may be supplied to the wire for resistance heating purposes.
The end plugs are each respectively provided with a well 20 and 22,
for containing a suitable conductive sealant 24, such as mercury,
which serves the dual purpose of providing a gas seal around the
wire where it penetrates the end plugs, and further providing
electrical contact between the moving wire and the respective end
plugs which are in turn electrically connected through the tubes 10
and 12 and the leads 26 and 28 to a suitable DC power source 30.
The upper plug 14 is provided with a peripheral groove 34, which
communicates with the mercury well 20 through the passageway 36, to
provide peripheral sealing around the plug. Sealing between the end
plug 16 and the lower end of the containment vessel 6 is provided
by mercury contained in an annular well 38.
The respective plugs are each formed with a centrally oriented
orifice 40 and 42 which is large enough to accommodate the free
passage of the wire 2 therethrough but which, in combination with
the wire, is small enough to retain the mercury, through surface
tension forces, in their respective wells.
The hydrogen is considered necessary in the reactant mixture since
it acts not only as a coolant for the end plugs 14 and 16 but also
acts to even temperature distribution and to catalyze the methane
reaction. In practice, the relative proportions, expressed in flow
rate ratios of the constituent methane and boron trichloride gases
are critical to the formation of useful filaments. It is
considered, for example, that with the hydrogen/boron trichloride
ratio in the range of 0.5 to 2.0, preferably at 1.0, the
methane/boron trichloride ratio must be greater than 1.0 but less
than approximately 10, preferably 1.16 to 8.08, and optimally 2.34.
At a mass flow ratio of methane/boron trichloride of 1.0
carbon-boron deposition resulted in embrittled filaments which
could not be handled without breaking.
By utilizing various gas flow ratios, relative amounts of
carbon/boron in the coating layer may be varied. At the optimum
ratio, monofilaments with a coating of C(52 percent B) had an
average tensile strength of 265,000 psi and Young's Modulus of 41
.times. 10.sup.6 psi. As shown in FIG. 2, passage through the
reactor results in a composite filament comprising a filamentary
carbon core 46 having a relatively thick adherent coating of
essentially amorphous carbon-boron 48. The term "essentially
amorphous" for purposes of the present invention is intended to
mean that degree of amorphousness which is represented by the
appearance of one or two carbon reflections in the X-ray pattern of
an X-ray diffraction study. Subsequent to the formation of the
carbon-boron layer, like filaments are consolidated and bonded to
the desired matrix material by such standard techniques as plasma
spray, liquid infiltration or powder metallurgy and braze or
diffusion bonding.
Various process techniques and parameters may be utilized in
producing filaments of the present invention, as indicated by the
following examples. The filamentary carbon substrates utilized were
carbon monofilaments commercially available from Great Lakes Carbon
and, although of varying diameters as indicated in the examples,
all exhibited an average UTS of 150,000 psi Young's Modulus of 4.8
.times. 10.sup.6 psi.
EXAMPLE 1
In a reactor of the type illustrated utilizing a 24 inch long
reactor formed from 12 mm Pyrex tubing and a reactant gas mixture
of methane, boron trichloride and hydrogen, a carbon-boron alloy
coating was produced on a 1.68 mil carbon monofilament. The gas
flows were: methane 597 cc/min, BCl.sub.3 74 cc/min and H.sub.2 74
cc/min to yield a CH.sub.4 /BCl.sub.3 ratio of 8.08 and an H.sub.2
/BCl.sub.3 ratio of 1.0. The monofilament was resistively heated
utilizing 1900 volts and 140 milliamps at a power setting of 252
watts to a temperature of 1105.degree.C while moving through the
reactor at a rate of 40 ft/hr and achieved a final diameter of 3.3
mils. Several runs were made and the average UTS of this filament
was 154,000 psi. The coating was subjected to electron microprobe
analysis as well as X-ray diffraction studies and found to consist
essentially of an adherent essentially amorphous carbon-boron alloy
layer consisting essentially of 59.5 atomic percent C, 40.5 percent
B.
EXAMPLE 2
The same apparatus and conditions were utilized as in Example 1
except that substrate filament speed was 30 ft/hr and a substrate
temperature of 1100.degree.C was obtained by 2100 volts, 120
milliamps and 252 watts. The coated filament had a diameter of 3.2
mils and the average UTS was 153,000 psi. The quality and
composition of the coating was the same as in Example 1.
EXAMPLES 3-11
In the reactor apparatus of Example 1, a CH.sub.4 /BCl.sub.3 ratio
of 4.97 and an H.sub.2 /BCl.sub.3 ratio of 1.0 was maintained by a
methane gas flow of 538 cc/min, a BCl.sub.3 gas flow of 108 cc/min
and an H.sub.2 gas flow of 108 cc/min. All of the coatings
consisted of adherent essentially amorphous carbon-boron alloy
having a composition at 55 atomic percent C, 45 percent B. The
conditions and results are given in the following table.
TABLE I
__________________________________________________________________________
CH.sub.4 /BCl.sub.3 Ratio at 4.97
__________________________________________________________________________
Final Avg. Current Voltage Power Temp. Substrate Diam Speed UTS Ex.
(ma) (volts) (watts) (.degree.C) Diam(mil) (mil) (ft/hr) (psi)
__________________________________________________________________________
3 120 2050 246 1130 1.68 3.3 40 185,000 4 140 1800 252 1105 do. 3.6
do. 166,000 5 160 1650 264 1130 do. 4.0 do. 181,000 6 160 1850 296
1130 do. 3.4 30 188,000 7 160 1825 292 1105 do. 4.3 do. 182,000 8
140 1900 266 1110 do. 4.0 do. 225,000 9 140 1900 266 do. 4.0 do.
188,000 10 90 1600 144 1095 1.36 3.0 40 186,000 11 100 1550 155
1140 do. 3.1 do. 156,000
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES 12-27
In the reactor apparatus of Example 1, a CH.sub.4 /BCl.sub.3 ratio
of 2.34 and an H.sub.2 /BCl.sub.3 ratio of 1.0 was maintained by a
methane gas flow of 407 cc/min, a BCl.sub.3 gas flow of 174 cc/min
and an H.sub.2 gas flow of 174 cc/min. All of the coatings
consisted of adherent essentially amorphous single phase
carbon-boron alloy having a composition at 48 atomic percent C, 52
percent B. Conditions and results are given in the following
table.
TABLE II
__________________________________________________________________________
CH.sub.4 /BCl.sub.3 Ratio at 2.34
__________________________________________________________________________
Final Avg. Current Voltage Power Temp. Substrate Diam Speed UTS Ex.
(ma) (volts) (watts) (.degree.C) Diam(mil) (mil) (ft/hr) (psi)
__________________________________________________________________________
12 140 2750 385 1100 2.2 3.1 50 195,000 13 150 2750 413 1135 do.
3.6 do. 240,000 14 160 1700 272 1190 do. 4.2 do. 186,000 15 150
1750 262 1155 do. 4.0 30 270,000 16 140 1950 273 1185 1.60 4.8 do.
187,000 17 160 1700 272 1160 do. 5.2 do. 209,000 18 130 2010 262
1130 1.68 4.4 do. 258,000 19 105 1450 152 1140 do. 3.2 40 283,000*
20 140 1250 175 1135 do. 4.4 do. 266,000 21 100 2500 250 1155 1.36
3.6 do. 296,000 22 100 2325 233 1145 1.33 3.4 do. 297,000 23 100
2275 228 1140 do. 3.5 do. 308,000 24** 160 2400 384 1230/1185 do.
5.2 do. 165,000 25*** 100 2675/2700 268 1100/1150 do. 3.2 do.
297,000 26 100 1440-1610 150 1175 do. 3.4 do. 296,000 27 100 1500
150 1170 do. 3.2 do. 327,000
__________________________________________________________________________
*Individual values as high as 400,000 psi. **Gas flow rates doubled
(i.e., CH.sub.4 at 814 cc/min, BCl.sub.3 and H.sub.2 each at 348
cc/min) ***Gas flow rates halved (i.e., CH.sub.4 at 253.5 cc/min,
BCl.sub.3 and H.sub.2 each at 87 cc/min)
EXAMPLE 28
In the reactor apparatus of Example 1, a CH.sub.4 /BCl.sub.3 ratio
of 1.16 and an H.sub.2 /BCl.sub.3 ratio of 1.0 was maintained by a
methane gas flow of 202 cc/min, a BCl.sub.3 gas flow of 174 cc/min
and an H.sub.2 gas flow of 174 cc/min. A carbon-boron alloy coating
was produced on a 1.36 mil Great Lakes Carbon monofilamentary
substrate. The substrate was resistively heated utilizing 1610
volts, 105 ma and 169 watts to 1185.degree.C while moving through
the reactor at a rate of 40 ft/hr and achieved a final diameter of
4.2 mils. Several runs were made and the average UTS was 247,000
psi. The coating appeared to be an adherent single phase
carbon-boron layer having a composition calculated to consist of 43
atomic percent C, 57 percent B.
Further experimentation was conducted at CH.sub.4 /BCl.sub.3 flow
ratios both above and below those given for Examples 1-28. At
ratios higher than the 8.08 of Examples 1 and 2, the results were
generally less satisfactory. In one series of experiments, for
example, with a CH.sub.4 /BCl.sub.3 ratio of 10.15 and an H.sub.2
/BCl.sub.3 ratio of 1.0 maintained by a methane gas flow of 632
cc/min, a BCl.sub.3 gas flow of 62.3 cc/min and an H.sub.2 gas flow
of 62.3 cc/min, seventeen separate runs of 1.68 mil carbon
monofilament were made. Using parameter ranges of 120-210 ma,
1160-2350 volts, 237-315 watts, 1080.degree. - 1135.degree.C at
speeds of 30-40 ft/hr, the coated filaments had a final diameter of
2.6- 4.3 mils and a total average UTS of 99,000 psi. The coating
was adherent single phase carbon-boron alloy with a composition
consisting essentially of 64 atomic percent C, 36 percent B.
At a CH.sub.4 /BCl.sub.3 ratio lower than 1.16, the results were
unsatisfactory. In one investigation, for example, with a CH.sub.4
/BCl.sub.3 ratio of 1.0 and an H.sub.2 /BCl.sub.3 ratio of 1.0
maintained by a methane gas flow of 252 cc/min, a BCl.sub.3 gas
flow of 252 cc/min and a hydrogen gas flow also at 252 cc/min,
continuous runs could not be sustained because, with decomposition,
there was severe embrittlement and consequent fiber breakage.
The carbon-boron coated carbon filaments are suitable for use in
the reinforcement of not only resin, such as epoxy, but also metal
matrices such as, for example, aluminum, magnesium and when
properly coated, titanium and nickel. The filaments of Example 19
were subjected to testing in aluminum matrices. Composites were
prepared by winding the coated fialment around 1 mil 2024 Al foil
wrapped around a 12 inch diameter mandrel, spraying with
polystyrene, removing from the mandrel and cutting into 1 .times. 5
inch pieces. A plurality of pieces (6 to 8) were laid up and
diffusion bonded in a hot press at a temperature of 480.degree.C
and pressure of 10,000 psi for 20 minutes. The resulting composite
had a fiber loading of 45 vol. percent, a UTS of 98,000 psi and a
Young's Modulus of 23 .times. 10.sub.6 psi.
By means of the present invention, it will be appreciated that a
composite filament has been provided which significantly improves
the potential utility of carbon in filament-reinforced structures,
particularly insofar as the selection of matrix materials usable
therewith is concerned.
What has been set forth above is intended primarily as exemplary to
enable those skilled in the art in the practice of the invention
and it should therefore be understood that, within the scope of the
appended claims, the invention may be practiced in ways other than
as specifically described.
* * * * *