U.S. patent number 3,867,041 [Application Number 05/421,379] was granted by the patent office on 1975-02-18 for method for detecting bruises in fruit.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of. Invention is credited to Galen K. Brown, Larry J. Segerlind.
United States Patent |
3,867,041 |
Brown , et al. |
February 18, 1975 |
Method for detecting bruises in fruit
Abstract
Detection of bruises in several genera of fruit including
apples, peaches, and pears has been accomplished by measuring the
reflectance of near infrared light from the fruit surface. The
method is particularly adaptable to automation.
Inventors: |
Brown; Galen K. (Ashley,
OH), Segerlind; Larry J. (East Lansing, MI) |
Assignee: |
The United States of America as
represented by the Secretary of (Washington, DC)
|
Family
ID: |
23670277 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/421,379 |
Filed: |
December 3, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
356/448;
250/341.8 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G01N
21/3563 (20130101); G01N 33/025 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G01N
21/35 (20060101); G01N 21/31 (20060101); G01N
33/02 (20060101); G01j 003/48 () |
Field of
Search: |
;356/51,209,212,237
;250/341 ;209/111.7,111.6 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
M Ingle and J. F. Hyde - The Effect Of Bruising On Discoloration
And Concentration Of Phenolic Compounds In Apple Tissue-Proc. Amer.
Soc. Hort. Sci.,-V. 39-1968-pp. 738-745..
|
Primary Examiner: Lynch; Michael J.
Assistant Examiner: Anagnos; L. N.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Silverstein; M. Howard Hensley; Max
D. McConnell; David G.
Claims
1. A method of detecting bruises in apples, peaches, pears, and the
like comprising the steps of:
a. illuminating the outer surface of a fruit, said surface being
unbroken, with diffuse light at wavelengths of from 700 to 2,200
nm.;
b. detecting the light reflected from the fruit surface with a
photoemissive detector;
c. determining the amount of light reflected from the surface of an
unbruised portion of said fruit;
d. determining the amount of light reflected from each portion of
the entire fruit surface having an area equal to the area of the
portion disclosed in (c);
e. comparing the amount of light determined in (c) to the amount of
light determined in (d); and
f. detecting a bruise in the fruit when the amount of light
determined in
2. The method described in claim 1 wherein the area of the portions
of fruit surface disclosed in (c) and (d) is equal to or less than
the area
3. The method described in claim 1 wherein the amount of light
determined in (d) is from 0.02 to 0.32 reflectance units lower than
the amount of
6. The method described in claim 1 wherein the fruit are pears.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a method of detecting bruises in fruit
which will lend itself to automation.
Bruises on fruits such as applies, peaches, pears, and cherries
result in grade defects, higher grading cost, and the necessity for
hand trimming or alternate uses of the fruit. Studies of hand fruit
harvests have shown that bruises occur in as high as 16 percent of
the applies, 24 percent of the peaches, and 6 percent of the pears.
Increased use of mechanical pickers will increase the number of
bruises and other surface defects. Most of the grading of fruit is
a visual-hand operation despite the fact that much research has
been done in an effort to find an automatic method of grading.
T. L. Stiefvater (M. S. Thesis, Cornell Univ. Agr. Eng. Dept.,
1970) reviewed the literature for suitable methods of detecting
bruises in apples and set forth three primary criteria. A suitable
method must be:
1. BASED ON RELIABLY IDENTIFIABLE BRUISE EFFECTS;
2. NONDESTRUCTIVE; AND
3. ADAPTABLE TO HIGH-SPEED SORTING.
For bruise detection to be nondestructive, an apparatus used for
this purpose must necessarily perform its task from outside the
fruit without undue manipulation. X-ray techniques reportedly have
been quite successful in detecting flaws in fruits (Diener, et al.,
ASAE Paper No. 69-380, 1969; and Ziegler et al., ASAE Paper No.
70-553, 1970), but X-rays have the inherent problems of expense and
safety.
Rehkugler, et al., (Transactions of the ASAE 14: 1189-1194, 1971)
describe a method of bruise detection in apples which relies on the
fact that most bruises leave a dent such that a discontinuity is
formed on the surface (i.e., skin) of the fruit. A ray of visible
light reflecting from the surface is sufficiently deflected by the
discontinuity to be detected.
Ingle and Hyde (Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 93: 738-745, 1968)
determined differences in light reflectance at 600 nanometers (nm.)
between bruised and unbruised apple pulp. However, this required
slicing the apple to obtain samples to be tested. There have been
several publications describing surface reflectance of light in the
region of 400 to 2,100 nm. R. V. Lott (Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.
43: 59-62, 1943; and ibid., 44: 157-171, 1944) and Bittner and
Norris (Transactions of the ASAE 11: 534-536, 1968) recorded
spectral data from reflectance measurements of several varieties of
apples, peaches, and pears and related the data to maturation.
However, all of these studies were silent as to the reflectance
measurements of bruises. We were surprised, therefore, when we
discovered a significant difference between the reflectance
measurements from the unbroken surfaces of bruised and unbruised
portions of fruit.
Bruises on apples, peaches, pears, and the like can be easily
detected by the following steps:
a. illuminating a fruit surface with diffuse light at wavelengths
of from 700 to 2,200 nm.;
b. detecting the light reflected from the surface with a
photoemissive detector;
c. determining the amount of light reflected from the surface of an
unbruised portion of the fruit;
d. determining the amount of light reflected from each portion of
the entire fruit surface having an area equal to the area of the
portion disclosed in (c);
e. comparing the amount of light determined in (c) to the amount of
light determined in (d); and
f. detecting a bruise in the fruit when the amount of light
determined in (d) is significantly lower than the amount of light
determined in (c).
The drawings consist of 17 figures which depict graphs comparing
wavelength versus reflectance measurements of bruised and unbruised
portions of peaches, pears, and several varieties of apples.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In order to accomplish its object, the invention relies on the
discovery that the dry surfaces over bruised portions of certain
fleshy fruits (e.g., apples, peaches, pears, and cherries) reflect
less infrared light than the surfaces of unbruised portions. The
object of the invention is the provision of a quick, reliable
method of detecting bruises so that bruised fruit can be sorted
from unbruised fruit, preferably by automated mechanical means.
Sorting methods of the type in which the invention is used begin by
positioning the fruit in front of the infrared light source and
detector. This can be done by hand or by a suitable mechanical
means. The light source is such that the portion of the fruit
surface to be measured is evenly illuminated with diffuse light
having wavelengths of at least from 700 to 2,200 nm., and the
photoemissive detector is positioned so that it measures light
reflected from the specified portions of the fruit surface. It is
first necessary to measure the light reflected from a portion of
fruit surface which is known to be free of any sort of bruise or
other impairment. This is used as the control. Since at any given
wavelength the unbruised surface of each member of a specific fruit
variety at the same level of maturity reflects essentially the same
amount of light, the control measurement need only be taken once
for each batch of fruit to be tested. However, it is preferred that
the control measurement be rechecked at frequent intervals. After
the control measurement has been established, reflectance
measurements are taken over the entire surface of each fruit to be
inspected in the same manner as the control. Changes in position of
the fruit in relation to the detector port can be accomplished by
hand or by some suitable mechanical means. All reflectance
measurements subsequent to the control measurement are then
compared to the control. A reflectance measurement which is
significantly lower than the control indicates a bruise or other
similar damage. Bruises inflicted on the fruit in the examples
consistently had reflectance measurements which were from 0.02 to
0.32 reflectance units lower than the controls. Reflectance units
are expressed as percent of the total amount of light reflected
from a white standard. Measurements taken a few seconds after
bruising showed that reflectance is lowered at the instant the
bruise was made. At most wavelengths, more than half of the
decrease in bruise reflectance for apples occurred within the first
day of the 28- to 42-day test period.
Output of photoemissive detectors is an electric current so that
reflectance can be read directly from an ammeter calibrated to read
"bruised" and "unbruised" or the like. An operator is then able to
reject the bruised fruit either by hand or by some suitable
mechanical means. The electric output of the detector is also
useful for activating mechanical rejection devices in completely
automated systems.
For optimum measurement accuracy it is preferred that the diffuse
infrared light evenly illuminate that portion of the fruit surface
from which the measurement is being taken and that the detection
area be the same for all measurements including those taken for
controls. It is preferred that the detection area be equal to or
less than the bruises to be measured. It is also preferred that the
range of wavelengths being detected at any one time be relatively
narrow. This range of wavelength or band width can be controlled by
use of a narrow "slit." In the examples a constant slit width of
0.2 mm. was used, which resulted in band widths of from 20 nm. at a
wavelength of 700 nm. to 28 nm. at a wavelength of 2,200 nm.
It will be understood that infrared photometers are manufactured by
many companies and that the parameters of slit width, band width,
detection area, methods of illumination, etc., may vary with each
different manufacturer. Therefore, it will be further understood
that the instant invention should not be limited to the exact
parameters described above or in the following examples.
GENERAL PROCEDURE
Spectral Measurements
The diffuse reflectance spectrum of the various fruit surfaces was
recorded using a Zeiss PMQ II spectrophotometer and M4Q III
monochromator fitted with an integrating sphere reflectance
accessory with a 20-mm. sample port in front of which each fruit
was positioned by hand. A constant 0.2-mm. slit width was used
resulting in a spectral band width of 20 to 40 nm. depending on
wavelength. Because this is a single-beam instrument with a
constant long-term drift, it was necessary to record calibration
spectra of black and white standards both before and after fruit
spectra in order to obtain corrected fruit spectra. Reflectance was
calculated with the aid of a computer using the relation
R = (R.sub.f - R.sub.b)/(R.sub.w - R.sub.b)
where R is the fruit reflectance, R.sub.f the recorded fruit
reflectance, and R.sub.w and R.sub.b are the corrected reflectances
of the white and black standards, respectively.
Fruit and Test Conditions
Three varieties of apple, one variety of peach, and one variety of
pear were included in the tests. The apples were picked from the
Michigan State University orchards at East Lansing, the peaches,
grown in Pennsylvania, were purchased in East Lansing supermarket,
and the pears were picked from a commercial orchard near Fennville,
Mich. All fruit were 21/2-inch diameter minimum.
Flesh firmness values were determined using a Chatillon motorized
universal test stand (model HCTM) at a rate of 15 cm. per minute,
with appropriate Magness-Taylor probe. Six readings were taken on
unbruised portions of each of six fruit for apples and pears, see
Table 1.
Three fruit of each type were selected randomly for the reflectance
measurements which were averaged and R calculated as above and
plotted against wavelength (see FIG. 1-17). A uniform bruise was
produced on each fruit by dropping a 263-g. flat steel plate on the
fruit as it rested on a flat steel
Table 1
__________________________________________________________________________
Number Number Impact Avg. energy, Test of Force,.sup.1 of energy,
diameter, period, Fruit fruit lb. fruit g.-cm. mm. days
__________________________________________________________________________
Red Globe peach -- -- 3 30000 32 4 Bartlett pear 6 18.4 .+-. 1.5 3
30000 25 18 McIntosh apple 6 13.9 .+-. 0.6 3 10000 26 42 Jonathan
apple 6 14.4 .+-. 1.0 3 10000 26 28 3 5000 22 28 3 2500 18 28
Golden Delicious 6 16.8 .+-. 1.4 3 10000 24 28 apple 3 2500 16 28
Stored 4 months McIntosh apple -- -- 1 10000 25 7 Jonathan apple --
-- 1 10000 27 7 Golden Delicious -- -- 1 10000 28 7 apple
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.1 Mean force .+-. 1 standard deviation for all measurements.
Pears: 5/16 diameter probe, fruit skin removed. Apples: 7/16
diameter probe, fruit skin removed.
table. The drop height was varied to give different impact
energies, see Table 1. These energies generally produced a bruise
larger than the sample port of the integrating sphere.
The first reflectance measurements were taken within 2 hours after
bruising, then the fruit were placed in cold storage at recommended
conditions of temperature and relative humidity (Wright, U.S. Dept.
Agr., Agriculture Handbook No. 66, 77 pp., 1954).
EXAMPLE 1
A single variety of peach was selected and treated as described
above. Reflectance measurements were taken at 2 hours after
bruising and 4 days after bruising; R was calculated and plotted
against wavelength, FIGS. 1 and 2. Standard deviation of
reflectance was 0.02 and 0.09 for the bruise compared with 0.03 and
0.03 for the control at 800 and 1,200 nm., respectively.
After the reflectance measurements were taken on the 4th day, fruit
firmness was determined (Table 1) and each fruit was cut open to
observe the nature of the bruise. A shatter cone (V shape) bruise
and 1/8-inch layer of unbruised flesh just beneath the skin,
previously reported by Fridley and Adrian (Transactions of the ASAE
9: 135-138, 142, 1966), were observed.
EXAMPLE 2
A single variety of pear was selected and treated as described
above. Reflectance measurements were taken at 2 hours after
bruising, 14 days after bruising (before the fruit was ripened),
and 18 days after bruising (after the fruit was ripened).
Reflectance, R, was calculated and plotted against wavelength. The
reflectance curves were similar at 2 hours after bruising, 14 days
after bruising, or 18 days after bruising. In FIG. 3 are shown
reflectance at 14 days.
After the reflectance readings were taken on the 18th day, fruit
firmness was determined (Table 1), and each fruit was cut open to
observe the nature of the bruise. Bruises were of similar size, and
a shatter cone bruise and 1/8-inch layer of unbruised flesh just
beneath the skin were observed.
EXAMPLE 3
Three varieties of apple were selected and treated as described
above. Reflectance measurements were taken and R calculated and
plotted against wavelength for McIntosh, Jonathan, and Golden
Delicious apples having 10,000 g.-cm. impact bruises 1 day after
bruising (FIGS. 4, 6, and 8), 28 or 42 days after bruising (FIGS.
5, 7, and 9), and 7 days after bruising of apples held 4 months in
storage (FIGS. 15, 16, and 17). Jonathan apples were also bruised
with 5,000 and 2,500 g.-cm. impacts and the reflectance of the
bruises measured at 1 and 28 days after bruising (FIGS. 10, 11, 12,
and 13). Reflectance measurements of 2,500 g.-cm. impact bruises
were taken from Golden Delicious variety apples at 1 day after
bruising, FIG. 14. In the wavelength regions of 800, 1,200, and
1,700 nm. the standard deviation of reflectance for the controls
were 0.01, 0.02, and 0.02 nm., respectively; and for the bruises
were 0.02, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively. After reflectance
measurements were taken, each fruit was cut open to observe the
nature of the bruise. The bruises for a given variety and impact
energy were of similar size, no shatter cone was evident, and the
bruises began just under the skin.
* * * * *