U.S. patent number 3,854,871 [Application Number 05/328,382] was granted by the patent office on 1974-12-17 for textile cleaning process for simultaneous dry cleaning and finishing with stain repellent.
This patent grant is currently assigned to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company. Invention is credited to Albert Robert Eanzel.
United States Patent |
3,854,871 |
Eanzel |
December 17, 1974 |
TEXTILE CLEANING PROCESS FOR SIMULTANEOUS DRY CLEANING AND
FINISHING WITH STAIN REPELLENT
Abstract
A process for simultaneous cleaning and finishing of soiled
textile material in which the textile is (A) exposed to a cleaning
bath consisting essentially of a major amount of a textile dry
cleaning solvent and minor amounts of water, and containing (1) a
polyfluoroalkyl substituted stain repellent material and (2) an
emulsifying agent which does not adversely influence the stain
repellency of the treated textile material, and then (B) is
dried.
Inventors: |
Eanzel; Albert Robert
(Wilmington, DE) |
Assignee: |
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and
Company (Wilmington, DE)
|
Family
ID: |
26986355 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/328,382 |
Filed: |
January 31, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
8/142; 427/322;
427/393.4 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D06L
1/04 (20130101); D06M 15/277 (20130101); D06L
1/08 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
D06M
15/277 (20060101); D06L 1/00 (20060101); D06L
1/04 (20060101); D06L 1/08 (20060101); D06M
15/21 (20060101); D06l 001/04 (); D06l
001/08 () |
Field of
Search: |
;8/142,137 ;117/66 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Padgett; Benjamin R.
Claims
I claim:
1. A process for simultaneous cleaning and finishing of soiled
textile materials in which the textile is
A. treated at from about 0.degree. to about 100.degree.C. for from
about 1 minute to about 30 minutes with a composition consisting
essentially of
a major amount of a textile dry cleaning solvent;
a minor amount of water;
an amount sufficient to give add-on of 0.05 to 0.5 percent, based
on the dry weight of textile of a polyfluoroalkyl substituted stain
repellent; and
5 to 20 percent, based on the weight of stain repellent, of an
emulsifying agent which does not negate the stain repellency; and
then
B. the treated material is dried.
2. The process of claim 1 in which the stain repellent is
substituted with polyfluoroalkyl substituents containing from 3 to
16 carbon atoms, and the emulsifying agent is a hydrocarbon
copolymer of ethylene and an aminoalkyl acrylate monomer.
3. The process of claim 2 in which the emulsifying agent is present
in amounts ranging from 10 to 20 percent based on the weight of
stain repellent.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to an improved process for cleaning textile
materials and more particularly is directed to a process for
simultaneous cleaning and finishing of textiles using a bath of dry
cleaning solvent and water which contains a polyfluoroalkyl
substituted stain repellent and an emulsifying agent.
2. Prior Art
Textile dry cleaning is based on the fact that most soiling matter
is bound to textiles by a film of oil or grease, and dissolving the
oil in a solvent releases the dirt.
The solvents in common use are: perchloroethylene,
trichloroethylene, and the relatively recent introduction,
trichlorotrifluoroethane.
The solvent may be used alone and will give reasonably good
cleaning. The best results are obtained by filtering the solvent
continuously during cleaning so as to remove the released particles
of soiling matter and prevent redeposition. A proportion of the
filtered solvent containing dissolved oil and grease is distilled
after each load has been cleaned in order to prevent undue
accumulation of contaminants. This system of dry cleaning is used
less widely today because it is less efficient than other methods
in removing stains attached by water-soluble films, such as food
and beverage stains. In the alternative systems, small quantities
of water are carried into the solvent in such a way as to minimize
any harmful effects the water may have.
The latter system seems to be widely misunderstood outside the
dry-cleaning industry and sometimes even within the industry. It
involves the use of a solvent containing a moderately high
concentration of dissolved detergent and a controlled concentration
of dissolved water. The solution is used repeatedly in a process
involving continuous filtration.
In practice, the concentrations used vary over the range 0.5 to 4
percent by volume of detergent as purchased, and the detergents
commonly contain some 50 percent active material. Because of the
high concentration of detergent and attendant high cost, the bath
cannot be discarded after a single use. Continuous filtration to
remove suspended dirt particles as soon as possible is helpful in
almost any type of process, but it becomes essential when a bath is
reused repeatedly.
When small quantities of water are added to such a system, they
become solubilized and are held quite tenaciously. The partial
pressure of the water vapor in the atmosphere in equilibrium above
the solution is much below that of pure water at the same
temperature, and the ratio of this to the saturation vapor pressure
is known as the solvent relative humidity (SRH). At a given
temperature and detergent concentration, the SRH depends on the
water concentration, and it can therefore be controlled by
controlling the addition of water.
When textiles are immersed in a charged system
(solvent-detergent-water), an equilibrium tends to be set up
between the water in the textiles and the water in the solvent in
exactly the same way as an equilibrium is set up between textiles
and the surrounding atmosphere. The moisture regain of fibers in
equilibrium with a charged system with an SRH of 75 percent is the
same as that which they would attain when in equilibrium with an
atmosphere of 75 percent relative humidity at the same
temperature.
The significance of this is that sufficient water can be added to
the system to have a very marked effect in removing water-soluble
soilings without increasing the moisture regain of the fibers
beyond the level that they would have in contact with the ordinary
atmosphere. The usual risks of wet treatment, including shrinkage,
loss of creases, felting of woll, etc., can be avoided. The fact
that water can pass in either direction is a considerable safeguard
because, if a damp article is inadvertently included in a load, the
solvent will rapidly take up water, and the article will be exposed
to much less risk than would otherwise have been true.
The effect of adding water in this way may be judged from the fact
that, after cleaning in solvent alone, on average some 45-50
percent of garments need no further treatment to remove stains,
whereas, after cleaning in a charged system, the proportion may be
75 percent or more.
The dry-cleaning machine, although basically similar to a washing
maching, requires much more accessory equipment, and this is
generally built into the one assembly, which includes filter,
still, condenser, separator, and pumps and storage tanks, possibly
with control gear for the charged system. The machine serves not
merely as a washer, of the drum can also be run at high speed to
give centrifugal extraction and subsequently acts as a drying
tumbler. In order to recover the solvent, there is a closed
air-circuit. Hot air is blown through the load, and the
solvent-laden air then passes over cooling coils (or, in some
designs, meets a spray of cold water) to strip the solvent before
the air is reheated to repeat the circuit. When substantially all
the solvent has been removed from the load, the air-circuit is
opened, and air is vented from the machine for a short time.
The solvent application of finishes to textile products can be
performed in dry cleaning equipment by soaking the textiles in the
treating bath and spinning off the excess fluid. Prior art use of
such equipment, however, has merely adapted familiar application
methods to the available mechanical devices. In these prior art
methods, the application bath is prepared to contain about 0.1 to
10 percent by weight of solid repellent, whether in solution or
suspension. The textile material is soaked or agitated in the
treatment bath, then removed and freed of excess liquid by
centrifuging so that the dry pickup (weight of dry polymer on the
fiber) is about 0.1 to 10 percent of the weight of fiber. The
active ingredient in the treatment bath does not exhaust onto the
textile material. The concentration of repellent in the bath is not
appreciably reduced by the treatment process, but remains
essentially the same. So far as is known, there is no disclosure in
the prior art of a process simultaneously combining the two
functional treatments of dry cleaning and repellent or other finish
application.
Prior art applications of water and oil repellent compositions do
not combine the treatments, but rather apply the repellent in a
separate step after the cleaning operation is finished. Such
processes are disclosed for example in Italian Pat. Nos. 14308A/69,
14309A/69, 14310A/69, 14311A/69, 14312A/69, 14313A/69, and U.S.
Pat. No. 3,657,173. It was usually necessary to apply a wash or
rinse to remove the dry cleaning detergent, which, if present,
interfered with application or performance of the repellent. In the
process of this invention the two functions are combined
satisfactorily through the use of a composition wherein an aqueous
finishing composition is dispersed in dry cleaning solvent at a
relatively low concentration such that the dry cleaning procedure
can be carried forward in an essentially normal manner. The dry
cleaning detergents normally used in that operation are not
necessary in the process of this invention and can thus be omitted.
If used, however, higher amounts of stain repellent should be
used.
SUMMARY
In summary this invention is directed to a process for simultaneous
cleaning and finishing of soiled textile materials in which the
textile is
A. treated at from about 0.degree. to 100.degree.C. for from about
1 to about 30 minutes with a composition consisting essentially
of
a major amount of a textile dry cleaning solvent;
a minor amount of water;
an amount sufficient to give add-on of 0.05 to 0.5 percent, based
on the dry weight of textile of a polyfluoroalkyl substituted stain
repellent; and
5 to 20 percent, based on the weight of stain repellent, of an
emulsifying agent; and then
B. the treated material is dried.
DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
The present invention provides a process wherein textiles can be
cleansed of types of soil or foreign matter soluble in or removed
by the usual dry cleaning solvents exemplified by halogenated low
molecular weight hydrocarbon solvents and also the kinds of soil
soluble in or subject to removal by water. At the same time the
process applies polyfluoroalkyl substituted stain repellent to the
article being cleaned. The entire process can be carried out in the
absence of the usual dry cleaning detergents.
In carrying out this process, a water in oil type emulsion is first
prepared by mixing an aqueous dispersion of a textile stain
repellent agent into a relatively large amount of a halogenated
liquid having a boiling point between 25.degree.C. and
150.degree.C. and a relatively small amount of an emulsion
promoting agent which does not adversely affect the performance of
the repellent on the textile. The resulting water in oil type
emulsion is added to an organic solvent functioning as a cleaning
agent for textiles to form a very dilute extended water-in-oil type
emulsion. Textile material is then contacted with the dilute
emulsion at ambient or elevated temperature, after which the
textile material is dried. The treatment serves a plural function
in that:
1. Soil or foreign material soluble in the organic solvent is
removed from the textile.
2. Water soluble soil or stain is removed by the action of the
water present.
3. The repellent is deposited on the textile to serve its designed
function.
The invention has broad application in the processing and cleaning
of textiles. Where organic dry cleaning solvents are used as
cleaning agents the invention provides a method for accomplishing
several desirable objectives in one simple step. The combining of a
cleaning step and a stain repellent finish application is unique
and very valuable to the cleaner and processor.
More specifically, in this invention textile material is cleaned
and a polyfluoroalkyl substituted oil and water repellent is
deposited thereon in regular textile dry cleaning equipment with
very slight alteration of the normal cleaning cycle. The unique
combination of cleaning solvent, water, oil and water repellent and
emulsifier provides normal cleaning and significant stain repellent
qualities to the textile products. Water soluble stains are removed
and the objectionable necessity for "spotting" or hand removal of
stubborn stains is lessened or completely obviated.
Another application is found in textile processing where a step
involving exposure of the fabric to dry cleaning type solvent for
the purpose of removing processing chemicals is involved. Stain
repellents in the water-in-oil type emulsion are mixed with the
solvent to provide stain repellency after the cleaning step.
For the purpose of this invention, "soiled" textile materials means
textiles which are soiled or stained in use as well as new textiles
which contain processing chemicals.
In preparing an emulsion of water based finishing agent in solvent,
the usual dry-cleaning solvents are satisfactory, including
tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene
1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2,-trifluoroethane and
trichloromonofluoromethane. Stoddard solvent and others based on
petroleum fractions also function satisfactorily, however, the
halogenated solvents named above possess the advantage of lack of
flammability.
Any polyfluoroalkyl substituted or other textile finishing agent
exhibiting lack of solubility in water and in the solvents employed
can be used in the process of the invention. This group can include
not only oil and water repellents but also members which
additionally exhibit the quality of providing dry soil resistance,
improved soil release during laundering and other desired
properties to textile substrates. Since dry cleaning equipment does
not normally provide temperatures above about 210.degree.F., those
agents requiring a higher temperature cure for development of
functional performance are not recommended unless the required cure
temperatures can be otherwise provided, as for example in pressing
or the like. Of course such agents can be applied in dry cleaning
equipment where less than optimum performance is acceptable.
Oil and water repellent agents are exemplified by polyfluoroalkyl
substituted compounds which contain perfluorinated alkyl chains of
at least three and as many as 16 carbon atoms. Representative
agents are polymers of fluoro monomers which can be copolymerized
or "extended" with non-fluorinated monomers, and are listed below:
##SPC1##
where n can be 1 to 5 and R is H or CH.sub.3. These compounds are
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,547,861. ##SPC2##
where n is usually 3 but can be from 1 to 5, and R is H or
CH.sub.3. These compounds are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,544,663.
##SPC3##
where R is H or Ch.sub.3 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,803,615.
Useful polymers of such monomers are also disclosed in U.S. Pat.
Nos. 3,068,187 and 3,574,791. ##SPC4##
where n has a value of 3 to 14; m is an integer of from 1 to about
12; and R is H or CH.sub.3 are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos.
2,642,416, 3,102,103, 3,378,609, 3,392,046 and 3,546,187.
##SPC5##
where R.sub.f is a perfluorinated alkyl group of 3 to 17 carbons,
disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,386,977 and 3,395,174. ##SPC6##
where n is .gtoreq. 1; X is --O.sub.2 C alkyl, --(CH.sub.2).sub.m
OH, --(CH.sub.2).sub.m O.sub.2 C alkyl, OH wherein m is an integer
of 0 to 10; and R.sub.f is perfluoroalkyl of from 3 to 21 carbons
as disclosed in U.S. Pat No. 3,575,940, U.S. Pat. No. 3,514,420,
Japanese Pat. Nos. 23923/67, 26607/68, 1994/69 and 2182/70.
##SPC7##
where R.sub.f is perfluoroalkyl of 4 to 18 carbons; m is an integer
of 2 to 6; R is an alkyl group of 4 to 10 carbons; and R' is H or
methyl as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,304,278. v,45/4
where R.sub.f is perfluoralkyl of 5 to 12 carbons and R is H or
methyl as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,384,627.
The above list is not exhaustive, but merely exemplifies suitable
fluorine containing monomers which are employed in some commercial
oil and water repellent polymers for textile finishing. The
polymers are available in the form of aqueous emulsions containing
from 5 to 50 percent active ingredient (polymer).
In order to effectively disperse and emulsify the aforementioned
fluorinated repellents in dry cleaning solvent, an emulsifying
agent must be used which promotes dispersion but does not negate
the functional performance of the repellents on the treated fabric.
Conventional surfactants such as alkane sulfonates, long chain
alcohol sulfates, ethylene oxide additives of alcohols, acids,
amines and phenols, alkylnaphthalene sulfonates and the like can be
used; however, they tend to diminish water repellency and otherwise
interfere with the performance of the repellent. Where these or
other dry cleaning detergents are employed, their deleterious
effect can be largely overcome by increasing the amount of
repellent used and deposited on the textile substrate.
A number of chemical species provide the desired emulsion promoting
function. Preferred among them are:
1. water soluble salts of condensation products prepared by
reacting
methylol compounds of
aminotriazines,
urea,
cyclic ureas or their ethers with low molecular weight alcohols
with
aliphatic compounds containing a carbon chain of at least 7 carbon
atoms and a reactive hydrogen atom attached to a heteroatom
and
a primary or second amine,
a water soluble salt of a primary or secondary amine, or
a tertiary amine which contains a reactive hydrogen attached to a
heteroatom;
2. acrylate and methacrylate polymers and copolymers; and
3. hydrocarbon copolymers of 80 to 20 mol percent ethylene and 20
to 80 mol percent aminoalkyl acrylate monomers of the formula
##SPC8##
wherein
R.sub.1 is hydrogen or methyl,
R.sub.2 is hydrogen or alkyl of 1 to 4 carbons.
R.sub.3 is hydrogen or alkyl of 1 to 4 carbons, and
n is a positive integer of from 1 through 4.
Of the above emulsifying agents the copolymers of ethylene and
aminoalkyl acrylate monomers are most preferred. Suitable acrylate
monomers include 2-(dimethylamino) ethyl acrylate and methacrylate,
aminoethyl acrylate and methacrylate, 2-(diethylamino) ethyl
acrylate and methacrylate, 2-(methylamino) ethyl acrylate and
methacrylate, 2-(t-butylamino) ethyl acrylate and methacrylate and
3-(dimethylamino) propyl acrylate and methacrylate.
The water soluble salts of the condensation products and their
preparation are described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,783,231 and
preparation of the hydrocarbon copolymers is described in Canadian
Pat. No. 900,650.
The emulsifying agent is present during the treating process in a
weight ratio of from about 1:20 to 1:5 relative to the active
component or components of the finishing agent. A ratio of 1:10 to
1:5 is preferred.
The preferred manner of introducing the stain repellent to the
cleaning operation is in the form of a water-in-oil type emulsion.
The emulsion is prepared by mixing the repellent (which is itself
in the form of an aqueous dispersion) into a solution of the
emulsion promoting agent in a solvent. The solvent can
advantageously be the same as used in the textile cleaning
operation. The product should be uniform in composition, stable and
easily handled, so that it can be added to the cleaning system in
accurately known amounts with no more than a preliminary stirring
or shaking. It must be extendible in the cleaning solvent so as to
form and maintain a uniform treating composition. The product is
not limited so far as the concentration of water and repellent
material in solvent is concerned, so long as the product is
uniform. Normally the emulsion prodcut will contain from 1 to 25
percent of the polyfluoroalkyl substituted stain repellent,
preferably from 5 to 15 percent.
For use in textile cleaning, the above emulsion product is greatly
diluted in the cleaning solvent. The controlling factor is the
amount of repellent agent which is to be deposited on the textile
material. While easily discernible results are achieved even at
very low add-on of stain repellent, the preferred add-on is from
about 0.05 to about 0.5 percent of polymer solids on the dry weight
of the textile. Practically, the amount of repellent agent used is
determined by the weight of textile material to be processed and
the concentration of solid repellent in the emulsion product. For
50 pounds of textile material, using a prepared emulsion containing
10 percent of polyfluoroalkyl stain repellent, there would be used
from about 0.25 to about 2.5 pounds of the emulsion product whether
the cleaning procedure required 100 gallons or 200 gallons of
cleaning solvent. The concentration of repellent in the cleaning
bath itself is thus very low, in the order of 0.01 percent by
weight.
It is in this condition particularly that the process of the
invention differs from prior art processes for application of stain
repellents to textiles. Where the objective of a process is solely
the application of an adjuvant to a garment or other textile
product, a minimum amount of solvent or application medium will be
employed, since the solvent or application medium will have to be
purified, recovered or somehow handled for re-use. Where the
process objective is solely cleaning, the greater amount of
cleaning solvent used per unit weight of textile the better the
cleaning will be. The process of the instant invention performs the
two functions, and without the use of ordinary dry-cleaning
detergents.
While the stain repellent and emulsion promoting agent are
preferably introduced to the cleaning operation in the form of a
water-in-oil emulsion product, they can also be introduced
separately. That is, the emulsion promoting agent can first be
dissolved in or added to the cleaning solvent, and the familiar
aqueous emulsion of water and/or oil repellent added
subsequently.
The cleaning bath containing the polyfluoroalkyl substituted stain
repellent is applied to the textile material so as to provide
thorough and efficient contact between the two for a period of at
least about one minute. Agitation of textile material in a
perforated basket through the cleaning composition as in a dry
cleaning machine is quite satisfactory. Temperature of the bath
during treatment is not critical and can range between 0.degree.and
100.degree.C. Ordinarily both temperatures will range between about
15.degree. and about 50.degree.C. In general, where the equipment
affords the opportunity, it is best to mix the pure solvent
cleaning liquid with the textile material first, before adding the
repellent composition. In this manner particulate soil loosened
from the textile fibers can be removed by filtration, as in the
regular cycle of a dry cleaning machine, before introduction of the
repellent composition. If the repellent composition is present
while circulation and filtration of the cleaning fluid is in
progress some of it may be carried along in particulate form and
filtered out of the stream before it can be deposited on the
textile substrate. Where such filtration is a part of the cleaning
cycle, it is preferably omitted or by-passed during the period the
textile material is in contact with the repellent-laden cleaning
fluid. No other alteration is necessary in any of the well-known
dry cleaning machine cycles. Drying of the cleaned and treated
material can be carried out at any convenient temperature. Best
results are achieved when cleaning fluid is completely removed
before further processing of the textile.
While even better oil and water repellency is attained when the
usual hot pressing is carried out, this step is not essential to
the attainment of good oil and water repellency.
Textiles treated by the process of the invention exhibit a distinct
improvement in water and oil repellency and stain resistance.
Non-oily stains or "sweet spots" are effectively removed during the
dry cleaning procedure, and no more hand removal of stains is
required than with prior dry cleaning techniques. Where the
instance of water soluble stains is higher than normal, additional
water can be added with the fluororepellent composition. Water
level can be controlled by employing the solvent relative humidity
concept, as hereinbefore described. Redeposition of particulate
soil from the cleaning solvent appears to be minimized also in the
process of the invention.
Any of the well known commercial dry cleaning machines can be
employed in the process of the invention. Transfer or dry-to-dry
machines, drum types, open pocket and split pocket types are all
usable. The usual ratio of solvent to clothes (which admittedly
varies widely) can be used, for instance from about 0.5 to about 2
gallons per pound of textile being treated. The usual cycle times
are satisfactory except that the repellent composition is best not
introduced into the solvent until about one-half of the wash time
has passed, and the particulate filter should be bypassed after the
washing is resumed, as already mentioned.
The following examples illustrate the invention. Parts and
percentages referred to therein are by weight unless otherwise
indicated.
EXAMPLE 1
In a typical small commercial dry cleaning machine there were
placed 25 pounds of a variety of soiled garments for dry cleaning
and 2250 pounds of perchloroethylene. The machine was previously
washed thoroughly to remove any residual detergents, which might
impair the efficiency of the subsequent treatment. The cycle was
started, and after about 4 to 5 minutes (1/2 the normal washing
time) the filter was by-passed and 1/2 pound of a stain repellent
composition was added. The composition contained 71.5 percent
1,1,2-trichloroethylene, 1 percent of a copolymer derived from 70
percent ethylene and 30 percent dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate,
and 27.5 percent of an aqueous emulsion containing 77 percent water
and 23 percent of a copolymer obtained by emulsion polymerization
of a monomer mix containing (1) 75.0 parts of F(CF.sub.2).sub.n
CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2 O.sub.2 CC(CH.sub.3)=CH.sub.2 where n is 6, 8 and
10 in the weight ratio of 3:2:1 with additionally less than 10
percent by weight of n = 12 and 14, (2) 25.0 parts of
2-ethylhexylmethacrylate, (3) 0.25 part of N-methylolacrylamide and
(4) 0.25 part of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. A detailed method for
preparing this polymer is given in column 6, Example 1 of U.S. Pat.
No. 3,462,296.
After addition of the stain repellent composition, the cycle was
resumed. The garments were washed in the perchloroethylene stain
repellent for about 5 minutes and then agitation was stopped. The
liquid was drained away and the load spun and dried.
When tested for oil repellency and water repellency, very good
results were shown. Water repellency tests were performed according
to the AATCC Standard Test Method 22-1967 of the American
Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists. A rating of 100
denotes no water penetration or surface adhesion, a rating of 90
denotes slight random sticking or wetting, and so on down to 0
which denotes immediate wetting and penetration of water spray. Oil
repellency tests were carried out according to the AATCC Standard
Test Method 118-1966, using clear undyed oil. Results on garments
treated in this example ranged from 70 to 90 in water repellency
and 3 to 5 in oil repellency. Tests on untreated material gave 0 in
both oil repellency and water repellency. The incidence of "sweet
spots" was at least as low as with the normal detergent process.
There was no increase in wrinkling, and appearance of the garments
after pressing was judged equal or superior to those treated by
prior art processes. Handling and recovery of the dry cleaning
solvent was carried out in the routine manner. There was no
additional make-up or purification required.
Using the same composition and procedure, over 700 cycles were
carried out successfully, with continued excellent performance in
appearance, water repellency and "sweet spot" removal.
EXAMPLE 2
A cleaning composition was prepared by first dissolving 2 pounds of
the copolymer derived from 70 percent ethylene and 30 percent
dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate in 278 pounds of perchloroethylene,
then mixing in, with rapid agitation, 120 pounds of an aqueous
dispersion of a copolymer prepared by polymerizing a mixture of
monomers containing 90 parts F(CF.sub.2).sub.n CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2
O.sub.2 CCH = CH.sub.2 where n is 3 to 14, 10 parts of
trifluoroethylvinyl ether, 0.25 part N-methylolacrylamide and 0.25
part of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Preparation of this copolymer
is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,546,187. A stable emulsion
resulted.
In this application 70 pounds of 65 percent cotton-35 percent
polyester clothing were scoured at ambient temperature with about
70 gallons of perchloroethylene. The fabric was first washed in a
basket washer for about 5 minutes while particulate soil was
removed by filtering the circulating solvent. The 1.4 pounds of the
emulsified product described above were added to the
perchloroethylene along with 2 pounds of water to aid in removal of
water soluble soil. The fabric was then washed an additional 5
minutes while by-passing the solvent filter. After 1 to 2 minutes
of centrifugal extraction the fabric was dried at
160.degree.-170.degree.F. The treated clothes were clean and
exhibited good water repellency.
* * * * *