U.S. patent number 3,852,220 [Application Number 05/217,223] was granted by the patent office on 1974-12-03 for isocyanurate-based polyelectrolyte detergent composition.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Marathon Oil Company. Invention is credited to Perry A. Argabright, Albert L. Kimmel, C. Travis Presley.
United States Patent |
3,852,220 |
Kimmel , et al. |
December 3, 1974 |
ISOCYANURATE-BASED POLYELECTROLYTE DETERGENT COMPOSITION
Abstract
Detergent formulations containing isocyanurate-based
polyelectrolytes in conjunction with surfactants and other
conventional detergent formulation ingredients. The formulations
are useful for cleaning operations, e.g., laundering and
dishwashing.
Inventors: |
Kimmel; Albert L. (Kansas City,
MO), Argabright; Perry A. (Larkspur, CO), Presley; C.
Travis (Littleton, CO) |
Assignee: |
Marathon Oil Company (Findlay,
OH)
|
Family
ID: |
22810163 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/217,223 |
Filed: |
January 12, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
510/461; 510/359;
544/222; 510/229; 510/477; 510/488 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C11D
3/3726 (20130101); C11D 3/3703 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C11D
3/28 (20060101); C11D 3/00 (20060101); C11D
3/26 (20060101); C07d 055/00 (); C08g 022/04 ();
C11d 003/28 () |
Field of
Search: |
;260/77.5NC,248A
;252/DIG.2,DIG.3,DIG.15,89,99,110,524,542 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Rosdol; Leon D.
Assistant Examiner: Albrecht; Dennis L.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Herring; J. C. Willson, Jr.; R. C.
Hummel; J. L.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An improved detergent composition consisting essentially of at
least about 2 to about 70 weight percent of a surfactant and about
2 to about 20 weight percent of an isocyanurate-based
polyelectrolyte, wherein said isocyanurate-based polyelectrolyte
has the following chemical structure: ##SPC6##
wherein:
R = divalent hydrocarbon or substituted hydrocarbon radical and
contains about 2 to about 30 carbon atoms selected from the groups
of FIGS. 2 and 3
X = a monovalent radical selected from the group consisting of: Li,
Na, K, Rb, Cs, Ca, Ag, Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Ra, Zn, Cd, Hg, B, Al,
Ac, Ga, In, Tl, Ti, Zr, Hf, Ge, Sn, Pb, V, Nb, Ta, Sb, Bi, Cr, Mo,
W, Mn, Fe, Ru, Co, Ni, Rh, Pd, Ir, hydrogen and quaternary ammonium
groups,
A = a monovalent organic radical,
R' = monovalent hydrocarbon or substituted hydrocarbon radical,
m = average number of trisubstituted isocyanurate rings and is a
positive integer from 0 to about 400,
n = average number of isocyanuric acid and/or isocyanurate salt
groups, and is a positive integer from 1 to about 10,000,
2m +n +1 = average number of divalent R groups and is a positive
integer from 2 to about 110,000,
m + 2 = average number of A groups and is a positive integer from 2
to about 2,000,
and wherein there are no N-to-N bonds, no A-to-A bonds, and no
R-to-R bonds.
2. A formulation according to claim 1 wherein X is a monovalent
radical from the group consisting of alkali metal salts and
quaternary ammonium groups wherein R contains from about 2 to about
18 carbon atoms and wherein R' contains from about 1 to about 20
carbon atoms.
3. Detergent compositions comprising isocyanurate-based
polyelectrolytes consisting essentially of of from about 2 to about
20 weight percent of said isocyanurate-based polyelectrolytes,
together with at least one other detergent ingredient comprising
from about 2 to about 70 weight percent of surfactant, about 0 to
about 70 weight percent of phhosphate builder, 0 to about 40 weight
percent of silicate builder, have the following chemical structure:
##SPC7##
wherein:
R = divalent hydrocarbon or substituted hydrocarbon radical and
contains about 2 to about 30 carbon atoms selected from the groups
of FIGS. 2 and 3,
X = a monovalent radical selected from the group consisting of: Li,
Na, K, Rb, Cs, Ca, Ag, Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Ra, Zn, Cd, Hg, B, Al,
Ac, Ga, In, Tl, Ti, Zr, Hf, Ge, Sn, Pb, V, Nb, Ta, Sb, Bi, Cr, Mo,
W, Mn, Fe, Ru, Co, Ni, Rh, Pd, Ir, hydrogen and quaternary ammonium
groups,
A = a monovalent organic radical,
R' = monovalent hydrocarbon or substituted hydrocarbon radical,
m = average number of trisubstituted isocyanurate rings and is a
positive integer from 0 to about 400,
n = average number of isocyanuric acid and/or isocyanurate salt
groups, and is a positive integer from 1 to about 10,000,
2m + n + 1 = average number of divalent R groups and is a positive
integer from 2 to about 110,000,
m + 2 = average number of A groups and is a positive integer from 2
to about 2,000,
and wherein there are no N-to-N bonds, no A-to-A bonds, and no
R-to-R bonds.
4. A composition according to claim 3 wherein the sequestering
agent comprises 0 to about 20 percent by weight citrate based on
the total weight of the formulation.
5. A composition according to claim 4 wherein the sesquestering
agent comprises from about 5 to about 15 percent sodium citrate
based on the weight of the total formulation.
6. A process according to claim 3 wherein the sequestrate comprises
from about 5 to about 15 percent based on the weight of the total
formulation, and is selected from the group consisting of sodium
citrate, sodium tartrate, or sodium gluconate.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 224,904, now allowed describes
isocyanurate-based compositions suitable as polyelectrolytes in the
present invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of detergent
compositions generally classified in Class 252, subclass 99 of the
United States Patent Classification System.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Polyelectrolytes, that is, substances of relatively high molecular
weight which are capable of carrying electronic charges, are
incorporated in most detergent formulations, e.g., to counteract
the effect of water hardness, to reduce redeposition of soil onto
the material being cleaned. The principal polyelectrolytes used in
commercially available detergents are polyphosphates and these are
beneficial both in reducing hard water precipitate and deposition
of soil (J. C. Harris, Detergency Evaluation and Testing,
Interscience, 1954, page 158). Among the useful polyphosphates are
orthophosphates, e.g., trisodium phosphate and disodium phosphate,
condensed phosphates, e.g., tetrasodium pyrophosphate, sodium
tripolyphosphate, sodium tetraphosphate, and sodium
hexametaphosphate. (See Chap. 3, Davidsohn and Milwidsky, Synthetic
Detergents (1968).) Such polyelectrolytes fall under the more
general term "builders" which is used to apply to any ingredient of
its detergent composition which enhances cleaning performance or
cleaning economics. Builders generally act by causing
emulsification of soil, stabilizing suspensions of solid soil,
neutralizing acid soils as well as counteracting the effect of
material constituents present in water or other solvent used to
prepare the detergent solution. In addition to polyphosphates,
builders include alkali metal carbonate, bicarbonates, borates,
silicates, and phosphates, as well as organic builders such as
alkali metal or ammonium amino polycarboxylates, e.g., sodium and
potassium ethylene diamine tetraacetate, sodium- and potassium- and
triethanol ammonium-in-(2-hydroxy ethyl)-nitrilo diacetate and
phytic acid salts. The wide range of surfactants and other
ingredients useful in detergent formulations is discussed in the
above-mentioned text and also in Niven, Industrial Detergency
(Reinhold, 1955), McCutcheon's Detergents and Emulsifiers Annual
(Allured Publishing Corp., 1970 and other years), Sittig, Practical
Detergent Manufacture (Noyes Development Corp., 1968, McCutcheon's
Patent Review on Soaps, Detergents, and Emulsifiers (1966), and in
the literature references cited therein.
The popularly used phosphates have been found in recent years to
raise difficulty in pollution by way of eutrophication of rivers
and lakes. Various replacements for phosphates polyelectrolytes
have been suggested, e.g., nirilotriacetic acid (NTA), (see October
1971 Consumer Reports, page 592-594.) However, some of the
non-phosphate detergents, while avoiding eutrophication problems,
have posed serious problems of consumers safety. (See April 28,
1971, Chemical Week, pages 10-12.) The polyelectrolytes of the
present invention offer a new approach to these problems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
General Statement of the Invention
The present invention provides new processes and compositions for
cleaning purposes which contain compounds characterized by
containing in a single molecule the following groups: ##SPC1##
and at least one group selected from the class consisting of: a
monovalent organic radical selected from the following: isocyanate
(--NCO), urethane (--NHCO.sub.2 R'), urea (--NHCONHR'), amino
(--NH.sub.2), --NHR', or --NR.sub.2 ' and may or may not contain,
in addition to the above, a metal substituted isocyanurate:
##SPC2##
The compounds of the present invention have the general structure
shown in FIG. 1;
where:
R = divalent hydrocarbon or substituted hydrocarbon radical, as
described below and exemplified in FIGS. 2 and 3;
X = a metal, or hydrogen, or quaternary ammonium (which for the
purposes of this invention, acts like a metal) or a combination
thereof. Particularly preferred are hydrogen, quaternary ammonium,
and metals selected from the following groups of the Periodic
Table; Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb, Va, Vb, VIa;
including such metals as Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Ca, Ag, Au, Be, Mg, Ca,
Sr, Ba, Ra, Zn, Cd, Hg, B, Al Sc, Y, La, and the other rare earths,
Ac, Ga, In, Tl, Ti, Zr, Hf, Ge, Sn, Pb, V, Nb, Ta, Sb, Bi, Cr, Mo,
W, Mn, Fe, Ru, Co, Ni, Rh, Pd, Os, and Ir.
A = a monovalent organic radical selected from the following:
isocyanate (--NCO), urethane (--NHCO.sub.2 R'), urea (--NHCONHR"),
amino (--NH.sub.2, --NHR', or --NR.sub.2 ');
R' = monovalent hydrocarbon or substituted hydrocarbon radical, as
discussed below;
m = average number of trisubstituted isocyanurate rings and is a
positive integer from 0 to about 400, and most preferably from 0 to
about 200,
n = average number of isocyanuric acid and/or isocyanurate salt
groups, and is a positive integer from 1 to about 10,000, more
preferably from 2 to about 1000, and most preferably from 3 to
about 100,
2m + n + 1 = average number of divalent R groups and is a positive
integer from 2 to about 110,000, more preferably from 3 to about
1,100, and most preferably from 4 to about 140,
m + 2 = average number of A groups and is a positive integer from 2
to about 2,000, more preferably from 2 to about 400, and most
preferably from 2 to about 200;
and wherein there are no N-to-N bonds, no A-to-N bonds, no A-to-A
bonds, and no R-to-R bonds.
R preferably contains 2 to 40, more preferably 2 to 30, and most
preferably 2 to 18 carbon atoms.
R' preferably contains 1 to 40 carbon atoms, more preferably 1 to
20 carbon atoms, and most preferably 1 to 10 carbons, for example
--CH.sub.3, --C.sub.2 H.sub.5, --C.sub.3 H.sub.7, i--C.sub.3
H.sub.7, ##SPC3##
R and/or R' can be substituted with groups that do not interfere in
the product's subsequent utility or in its preparation. Examples of
such non-interfering groups are: --NO.sub.2, cl, F, Br, I, CN,
--CO.sub.2 R", --CO--R", --O--R", --SR", NR.sub.2 " --CONR.sub.2 ",
--SO.sub.3 R, --SO.sub.2 --, --SO--, phenyl naphthyl, alkyl, (1-40
carbon atoms), PO.sub.3 R", cyclohexyl, cyclopropyl, polymethylene
(e.g., tetramethylene), --OCOR", ##SPC4##
etc. where R" may be hydrogen, lower alkyl (e.g., ethyl, hexyl), or
aryl (e.g., monovalent radicals corresponding to the aryl radicals
described in FIG. 2). The examples or R (shown in FIG. 2) are set
forth for purposes of elucidation, not restriction.
It will be recognized that the values of m and n, described above,
are on the basis of the integers which will be used to describe a
single molecule. In actual practice, the invention will involve
mixtures of molecules of the general form described above. Thus,
the average value of m for the mixture may be from about 1 to about
350, more preferably from about 1 to 200, and most preferably from
about 1 to 100; and the value of n may be from about 0 to 2,000,
more preferably from 0 to 400, and most preferably from 2 to
200.
Utility of the Invention
Various formulations and processes of the present invention are
useful in the cleaning of a wide variety of materials such as
textiles, e.g., cottons, woolens, and synthetics; dishes, e.g.,
glassware, pottery, china, plastics, and metal utensils; floors and
woodwork, e.g., painted surfaces, wallpapered surfaces, plastics
and wood paneling, and lighting fixtures; industrial products,
e.g., roll formed, extruded, and stamped metals, molded and
extruded plastics; maintenance cleaning, e.g., aircraft, railroad
rolling stock, building surfaces, and windows.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows the general formula of the polyelectrolytes of the
present invention.
FIGS. 2 and 3 exemplify some of the possible structures of R groups
of the starting materials and products of the present invention,
all of which are more fully described in the aforementioned U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 224,904 filed Feb. 9, 1972 and
incorporated herein by reference.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Starting Materials
The starting materials for the polyelectrolytes of the present
invention are salts of polyisocyanuric acids produced according to
the techniques taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,573,259 (issued Mar. 30,
1971), by reacting a metal cyanate and an organic diisocyanate in
the presence of an aprotic solvent to form isocyanurate-containing
polyisocyanate metal salts.
Reaction Media
Water or mixtures of water and an alcohol, ketone, ester, amide,
sulfoxide, sulfone, etc.
Temperature
While not narrowly critical, temperatures in the range from
10.degree. to about 200.degree.C. are preferred, with
15.degree.-150.degree.C. being more preferred, and
20.degree.-120.degree.C. being most preferred. The lower limit is
generally the freeezing point of solution and the upper limit is
generally the boiling point of the solution at the reaction
pressure.
Pressure
While not narrowly critical, the reaction can be carried out at
pressures of from 0.5 to 100, with 0.6 to 50 being more preferred,
and 0.7 to 10 atmospheres being most preferred.
Time
The reaction time, of course, is dependent of the initial
concentration of the starting materials and the temperature. The
preferred time is from 0.01 to 4500 hours, more preferred 0.05 to
350 hours, and most preferred from 0.06 to 200 hours.
Formulations -- General
In general, the formulations of the present invention will be
prepared by substituting the isocyanurate-based polyelectrolytes
for all or part of the conventional polyelectrolytes previously
employed in detergent formulations suited for the particular
cleaning purpose. The techniques of the above references and other
detergent formulation techniques well known to those skilled in the
art, can readily be employed in preparing the new detergent
formulations and in optimizing them for maximum cleaning efficiency
with minimum injury to the materials being cleaned and minimum
toxcity hazard e.g., to children in the case of household-type
automatic dishwasher compounds and laundry detergent
formulations.
In general, the new detergent formulations will comprise one or
more isocyanurate-based polyelectrolyte, together with one or more
materials selected from the following: surfactants, e.g., anionic,
nonionic, cationic, phosphates (if not wholly replaced by the
isocyanurate-based polyelectrolytes), silicates, carbonates,
oxygen-releasing materials, bleaches, optical brighteners,
viscosity control agents (used with liquid formulations), solid or
liquid diluents, e.g., sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, water, pH
buffers, anti-redeposition agents, e.g., carboxymethylcellulose
alkali metal salt (CMC) chelating agents, e.g.,
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid or its alkali metal salt, e.g.,
sodium salt, hydrotropes, e.g., lower alkyl aryl sulfonates used
for maintaining materials in solution in liquid formulations,
amines and other organic compounds which add alkalinity to liquid
formulations, e.g. monoethanol amine, diisopropanol amine,
morpholine, alkyl alkanolamine, etc.
As shown by Examples XVIII and XIX, the polyelectrolytes of the
present invention are compatible with a wide range of common
detergent formulations. As shown by Example XX, the
isocyanurate-based polyelectrolytes do not pose any unusual
corrosion problems in conjunction with metals commonly used for
fabricating of cleaning equipment.
Formulations-Laundry
Typical laundry formulations are exemplified by detergent
formulations numbered 2-6 in Table 5 of Example XXI. In terms of
weight percent, these various ingredients typically comprise the
following preferred, more preferred, and most preferred ranges:
surfactant, e.g., alkyl aryl sulfonate, dodecyl benzene sulfonate
or alkyl sulfate, preferably 2-70, more preferably 10-60, and most
preferably 30-50 percent; phosphate builder, e.g., sodium
tripolyphosphate, sodium tetrapyrophosphate or trisodium phosphate,
preferably 0-70, more preferably 0-60, and most preferably 0-50
percent; silicate builder, e.g., sodium metasilicate, sodium ortho
silicate or sodium sesquisilicate, preferably 0-40, more preferably
5-30, and most preferably 15-25 percent; antiredeposition agents,
e.g., sodium carboxymethylcellulose, or starch, preferably 0-15,
more preferably 0-10, and most preferably 2-8 percent; carbonate or
other builder, e.g., sodium carbonate borax or sodium
sesquicarbonate, preferably 0-40, more preferably 0-35, and most
preferably 10-30 percent; citrate or other sequesterate, e.g.,
sodium citrate, sodium tartrate, or sodium gluconate, preferably
0-30, more preferably 0-20, and most perferably 5-15 percent;
together with one or more isocyanurate-based polyelectrolytes
totaling preferably 2- 20 percent, more preferably 3-15 percent,
and most preferably 4-12 percent.
Obviously, a wide variety of other ingredients can be added to
adapt such formulations to particular laundry applications.
Formulations-Automatic Dishwasher Detergents
A variety of automatic dishwasher detergents of the present
invention are exemplified by formulations numbered 2-3 and 5-6 of
Table 6 of Example XXII.
In terms of weight percent, these various ingredients typically
comprise the following preferred, more preferred, and most
preferred ranges: phosphate, e,g., sodium tripolyphosphate sodium
hexametaphosphate or trisodium phosphate, preferably 0-70, more
preferably 0-60, and most preferably 0-50 percent; silicate, e.g.,
sodium metasilicate, sodium orthosilicate or sodium sesquisilicate,
preferably 0-40, more preferably 5-30, and most preferably 15-25
percent; carbonate or other builder, e.g., sodium carbonate or
sodium sesquicarbonate, preferably 0-40, more preferably 0-35, and
most preferably 10-30 percent; surfactant, e.g., Triton CF 10,
Triton CF 52, or Plurafax RA43, preferably 0-10, more preferably
0-6, and most preferably 2-5 percent; bleach, e.g., chlorine
bleach, "ACl 66" or Chlorinated Trisodium Phosphate, preferably
0-15, more preferably 0-7, and most preferably 0-2 percent;
together with one or more isocyanurate-based polyelectrolytes
totaling preferably 2-20 percent, more preferably 3-15 percent, and
most preferably 4-12 percent. Obviously, a wide variety of other
ingredients can be added to adapt such formulations to particular
cleaning applications.
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE I
Six gallons of anhydrous (less than about 200 ppm water)
dimethylformamide (DMF) are charged to a 10-gallon, glass-lined
reactor manufactured by the Pfaudler Company. 936 grams (11.55
moles) of potassium cyanate (KOCN) hammermilled to pass through 325
mesh are added. The mixture is heated to 165.degree.-170.degree.F.
(75.degree.C.) while stirring to maintain good mixing. 1,726
milliliters (12.02 moles) of tolylene diisocyanate (TDI)
manufactured by Mobay Chemical Company and designated "Grade A
80/20 mixture" is added to the reactor at a rate of approximately
27 milliliters per minute, requiring about 64 minutes total for the
TDI addition. Ten minutes after addition of the TDI is completed,
3,000 milliliters of methanol is added to dilute the reaction
mixture and stop the reaction. The temperature is then maintained
at 165.degree.-170.degree.F. (75.degree.C.) with stirring for three
additional hours. Thereafter, the reaction mixture is cooled to
room temperature and filtered (centrifugation may be used instead).
The solids are then dried at 175.degree.F. (80.degree.C.) and the
resulting product is analyzed. Specific results of analysis and a
summary of the stoichiometric ratios, reaction temperature, and
other reaction conditions are shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLE II
The apparatus and starting materials of Example I are manipulated
as described in Example I, except that the potassium cyanate (KOCN)
used in the reaction is crushed (approximately 200 mesh) rather
than hammermilled. Specific results are shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLE III
The apparatus and starting materials of Example I are manipulated
as described in Example I, except that the TDI addition rate is
doubled and the stoichiometric quantity of DMF solvent is reduced
by approximately 50 percent. Specific results are shown in Table
1.
EXAMPLE IV
The apparatus and starting materials of Example I are manipulated
as described in Example I, except that the TDI addition rate is
doubled. Specific results are shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLE V
The apparatus and starting materials of Example I are manipulated
as described in Example I, except that the TDI addition rate is
reduced by one-half. Specific results are shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLE VI
The apparatus and starting materials of Example I are manipulated
as described in Example I, except that the TDI addition rate is
reduced to 40 percent of the original rate, the stoichiometric
ratio of dimethylformamide solvent is reduced by a factor of
one-half, and crushed KOCN is used. Specific results are shown in
Table 1.
EXAMPLE VII
The apparatus and starting materials of Example I are manipulated
as described in Example I, except that the TDI addition rate is
reduced by a factor one-half and crushed KOCN is used. Specific
results are shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLE VIII
The apparatus and starting materials of Example I are manipulated
as described in Example I, except that the TDI addition rate is
reduced by a factor of one-half and crushed KOCN is used. Specific
results are shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLES IX-XVI
Fifty-eight gallons of anhydrous (less than 200 ppm water)
dimethylformamide (DMF) are charged to a 100-gallon, glass-lined
reactor manufactured by the Pfaudler Company. Twenty and six-tenths
pounds of potassium cyanate (KOCN), crushed to pass a 200 mesh
screen, are added. The mixture is heated to
165.degree.-170.degree.F. (75.degree.C.) while stirring to maintain
good mixing. A total of 46.4 pounds of tolylene diisocyanate (TDI)
is added to the reactor at a rate of approximately 0.008 mole of
TDI per minute per mole of KOCN in the reactor. This addition
requires a total of approximately 132 minutes. Ten minutes after
the addition of TDI is complete, 63.0 pounds of methanol is added
to dilute the reaction mixture and stop the reaction. The
temperature is then maintained at 165.degree.-170.degree.F.
(75.degree.C.) with stirring for three additional hours.
Thereafter, the reaction mixture is cooled to room temperature and
centrifuged. The solids are dried at 175.degree.F. (80.degree.C.)
and the resulting product is analyzed. Specific results of analysis
and the specific stoichiometric ratios, temperatures, and other
reaction conditions are shown in Table 1. ##SPC5##
EXAMPLE XVII
Acute Oral Toxicity, Skin and Eye Irritation
When the product of Example XIV, above, is conventionally tested
with rats and mice it is classified as relatively non-toxic because
the compound is found not to be toxic after single dosages at a
level of 4 gr. per kilogram of body weight and no adverse effects
are noted during a 14 day observation period after such dosages.
Skin and eye irritation is found to be of a very low order.
EXAMPLE XVIII
Compatibility with Inorganic Materials
A series of dry mixes is prepared with inorganic detergent builders
and the polyelectrolyte in ratios of 95:5, 90:10, 80:20 and 50:50.
Additional inorganic materials and some inorganic salts of organic
acids are also prepared at the 90:10 ratio. From these mixes a 1%
aqueous solution is prepared and observed for compatibility. If the
solutions remain clear for 24 hours, the combination is rated as
compatible. If a cloudy solution results and remains cloudy for 24
hours, the mixture is considered incompatible. Table 2 lists the
inorganic materials and the results of these experiments.
From the data obtained from this study, it is evident that the
isocyanurate-based polyelectrolyte is compatible with all the
common inorganic detergent builders studied.
Table 2
__________________________________________________________________________
COMPATIBILITY OF POLYELECTROLYTE OF EXAMPLE I WITH COMMON DETERGENT
BUILDER (INORGANIC SALTS) 1% SOLUTION OR MIX IN WATER Ratio
Polyelectrolyte to Builder Salt Builder Salt 5:95 10:90 20:80 50:50
__________________________________________________________________________
Sodium Metal Silicate C C C C Sodium Sesquisilica NS C NS NS Sodium
Ortho Silicate NS C NS NS Trisodium Phosphate C C C C Sodium
Tripoly Phosphate C C C C Tetra Sodium Pyro Phosphate C C C C Borax
NS C NS NS Sodium Carbonate C C C C Sodium Sesquicarbonate C C C C
Sodiumn Sulfate C C C C Sodium Citrate NS C NS NS Sodium Gluconate
NS C NS NS Sodium Hydroxide C C C C
__________________________________________________________________________
Note: C = Compatible I = Incompatible NS = Not Studied EXAMPLE
XIX
Compatibility with Surfactants
A series of experiments is conducted to determine the compatibility
of the polyelectrolyte with the three types of surfactants
(anionic, non-ionic and cationic). For these experiments, a 10
percent stock solution of the electrolyte is prepared. Two each of
the various surfactants are added in portions of 1 and 3 percent on
a weight basis of 50 ml of the stock solution. A clear solution
after 24 hr indicates compatibility. A cloudy solution persistent
for 24 hr indicates incompatibility. Included with the surfactants
are both EDTA and NTA tested at the same levels. Table 3 presents
the results of this study.
These experiments show that the isocyanurate-based polyelectolyte
is compatible with anionic and nonionic surfactants, EDTA and NTA.
It is incompatible with one of the cationic surfactants and
compatible with the other. This latter result indicates that when
the polyelectrolyte is used with cationic surfactants, a
compatibility determination must be conducted.
Table 3
__________________________________________________________________________
COMPATIBILITY OF POLYELECTROLYTE OF EXAMPLE I WITH COMMON
SURFACTANTS - Surfactant % Surfactant Trade Name Chemical Name Type
1% 3%
__________________________________________________________________________
Sulframin 40 Sodium alkyl aryl sulfonate anionic C C Sodium
dodecylbenzene sulfonate do. C C Triton CF 10 Ethyloxylated alcohol
nonionic C C Biosoft EA 10 Ethyloxylated fatty alcohol do. C C
Hyamine 1622 Quat. ammonium cationic I I Hyamine 2389 Quat.
ammonium cationic C C Versene 100 EDTA (ethylenediamine-
tetraacetic acid) sequesterant C C Hamshire X100 NTA
(nitrilotriacetic acid do. C C
__________________________________________________________________________
Note: C = Compatible I = Incompatible
EXAMPLE XX
Corrosion Studies with Selected Metals
A series of static corrosion tests are conducted to determine the
effects of the polyelectrolyte on metals. Specimens of copper,
silver, stainless steel, aluminum, and mild steel were partially
submerged in a 10 percent solution of polyelectrolyte. At the end
of 5 days immersion, weight loss is determined and the specimens
examined for liquid phase, vapor phase, and liquid vapor line
corrosion. The results of this study are presented in Table 4.
This study shows that the polyelectrolyte solution is less
corrosive to steel and aluminum than the sodium tripolyphosphate
solution. For silver and stainless steel, the corrosion is about
the same for both solutions and of a low order. Copper is
significantly corroded by both materials.
Table 4
__________________________________________________________________________
PARTIAL-IMMERSION CORROSION STUDY
__________________________________________________________________________
Corrosion Test Solution Metals Weight Loss Corrosion Type
Liquid-Vapor mg/sq ft (*) Liquid Phase Vapor Phase Interface
__________________________________________________________________________
Polyelectrolyte of 1010 Steel 590 Rust None Not Visible Example I
(10% Solution) 316 Stainless Steel 38 Not Visible Not Visible do.
Copper 949 Tarnish Pits Black Pits Black Pits Silver 96 Not Visible
Not Visible Not Visible Aluminum 78 Dull Dull Not Vis- ible Sodium
Tripolyphosphate 1010 Steel 6,511 Rust and Pits Rust Heavy Rust
(10% Solution) 316 Stainless Steel 0 None None None Copper 918
Lamulor Black Pits Black Pits Silver 76 Not Visible Not Visible Not
Visible Aluminum 825 Bright Pits Dull Gray
__________________________________________________________________________
Pits Note: (*) Submerged area only.
EXAMPLE XXI
Laundry Detergent Formulation and Evaluation
A series of laundry detergents are prepared and their washing
efficiency is determined in the Tergetometer. The basic formula for
the test detergent is that of a major product now being marketed.
This product is modified to provide both phosphate and nonphosphate
detergents with and without polyelectrolyte. The exact product
formula is shown in Table 5.
The soil cloth specimens are washed in the Tergetometer and the
conditions are as follow:
Detergent Concentration 0.5% Wash & rinse Temperature
120.degree.F. Wash Time 10 min. Rinse Time 5 min. Cycles 1 wash - 3
rinses Water to Cloth Ratio 80:1 Dry Period 16 hr at
70.degree.F.
The specimens are evaluated using the "Gardner Multiplepurpose
Reflectometer." Soil removal is calculated from the following
formula:
(A - B)/(C - B) .times. 100 = % soil removal
where:
A = reflectance of soiled cloth after washing
B = reflectance of soiled cloth before washing
C = the reflectance of an unsoiled piece of the same cloth.
The soil redeposition on clean cloth is calculated as a
redeposition index from the following formula:
D/C = redeposition index
where:
C = the reflectance of an unsoiled piece of the same cloth
D = the reflectance of the washed unsoiled cloth.
The closer the index is to one the less soil redepositioned and the
better the detergent.
Table 5 presents the data and results of these experiments. The
results of these experiments show that, when the isocyanurate-based
polyelectrolyte is incorporated in the basic formula, it does clean
significantly better, but has a slightly lower redeposition index.
This difference in redeposition index is not significant. The
nonphosphate counterpart of the basic formula, isocyanurate-based
polyelectrolyte, cleans almost equally as well.
Table 5
__________________________________________________________________________
LAUNDRY DETERGENT COMPOSITION AND PERFORMANCE
__________________________________________________________________________
Ingredients in Detergent Formulation Number Detergent Formulation
1.sup.a 2 3 4 5 6
__________________________________________________________________________
Ultra-sulfamin 40 30 g 30 g 40 g 40 g 40 g 40 g Sodium Tripoly
Phosphate 50 g 45 g 0 0 0 0 Sodium Meta Silicate 18 g 18 g 20 g 20
g 20 g 20 g Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose 2 g 2 g 2 g 2 g 2 g 2 g
Sodium Carbonate 0 0 23 g 18 g 23 g 20 g Sodium Citrate 0 0 10 g 15
g 10 g 0 Sodium Gluconate 0 0 0 0 0 13 g Polyelectrolyte.sup.b 0 5
g 5 g 5 g 10 g 10 g % Cleaning 3.29 4.06 2.99 2.87 3.50 2.80
Redeposition Index 0.976 0.970 0.967 0.964 0.974 0.974
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.a This formulation is equivalent to "All" without borax and
brighteners. .sup.b Polyelectrolyte of Example I.
EXAMPLE XXII
Automatic Dishwasher Detergent Formulation and Evaluation
When the polyelectrolyte of Example I is evaluated by formulating
into a variety of automatic dishwasher detergent formulations and
tested according to the Splash-Wash Tester Method described below,
the results were as given in Table 6.
Table 6
__________________________________________________________________________
AUTOMATIC DISHWASHER DETERGENT EVALUATION*
__________________________________________________________________________
Composition Formulation Number Performance 1 2 3 4 5 6
__________________________________________________________________________
Sodium tripoly- phosphate, g 55 55 -- -- -- -- Sodium silicate, g
25 20 50 50 50 50 Triton CF 10, g 3 3 3 3 3 3 Sodium carbonate, g
17 12 17 22 12 17 Sodium sesquicar- bonate, g -- -- 25 25 25 25
Polyelectrolyte of Example I, g -- 10 5 -- 10 5 Monsanto ACL 66
(chlorine bleach), g -- -- -- l-- -- 3 % Cleaning** 61.4 83.6 91.5
91.5 97.0 75.6 Redeposition*** 1.003 0.982 0.974 1.013 0.974 *
Splash-Wash Tester Method, see below ** Average values obtained
from three tests (each test containing four specimens). *** Average
values obtained from three tests (each test contained two tes
specimens).
SPLASH WASHER TEST METHOD
I. apparatus
A. Splash Washer
The splash washer is a plastic cylinder 5 in. in diameter, 81/2 in.
long, sealed at the bottom with an outlet in the center for
draining. An inlet is located on the side 11/2 in. from the bottom.
An electric motor 1/70 hp, 1,500 rpm fits on the top and turns the
agitator. The blades of the agitator are even with the inlet and
are bent at a 45.degree. angle. A removable copper ring with six
clips for holding test specimens rests on three screws 3 in. from
the top.
B. Photometer
Hunter Photometric Unit with Reflectance Standards.
Ii. test Specimen Preparation
A. Pretreatment of Slides
Wash 18 microscope slides (3 in. .times. 1 in.) in soapy water,
rinse and blot dry, free of spots. Twelve for soiling and six left
clean.
B. Soil Composition and Preparation
Black oatmeal soil: The formula, mixing and application
instructions for the black oatmeal spray mixture that is used as
soil load on the slides are as follows:
Weigh: 65.2 g Quaker Oatmeal (Old Fashioned)
344.3 g water
Add: 1/2 teaspoon salt while cooking over a low fire. Stir
occasionally while cooking to prevent sticking.
Weigh: 150 g cooked oatmeal, put in Waring Blender and stir while
slowly adding 150 ml water.
Weigh: 10 g India Ink and add to Waring Blender.
Continue mixing until uniform.
Remove mixture from blender and refrigerate for approximately 16
hr.
C. Application of Soil to Slides and Curing
Remove from refrigerator and mix until uniform.
Place mixture in spray-gun container and set air regulator at 50
psi spray pressure.
Hold spray-gun approximately 18 to 20 in. from slides and spray
evenly a 2 in. .times. 1 in. area on one side of the slides. (Be
extremely careful to avoid "runs.")
Allow sprayed slides to air-dry 15 min before placing in the oven
at 120.degree.F. for 20 min.
Allow slides to come to room temperature before placing in splash
washer.
D. Determination of Reflectance of Test Specimens with the
Photometer
1. Allow unit to warm up for 45 min.
2. Zero the unit.
3. Set unit at a standard reflectance (depending upon whether a
soiled or clean slide is to be measured) by using standards.
4. Place slide in holder, soiled side down. Read and record.
5. Read and record clean slides also.
Iii. testing Procedure
A. All Tests are Run in Triplicate
Four soiled and two clean test specimens for each run.
B. Placement of Test Specimens
Attach slides to clips on copper ring in the following manner.
Soiled surface toward center in following sequence: two soiled, one
clean, two soiled, one clean.
Place in splash washer.
C. Wash-Rinse Cycles
1. Add 300 ml of heated tap water (120.degree.F.) to 0.9 g of test
material, mix well and add through inlet to washer.
2. Run for 10 min, then drain.
3. Add 300 ml clean heated tap water (120.degree.F.) to washer.
4. Run for 5 min then drain and repeat Step 3.
D. Remove Slides and Allow to Air Dry
Iv. determination of Results
1. Measure reflectance of washed test specimens as done in Part II,
Section D.
2. calculation of results.
a. % Cleaning: is calculated for each soiled slide. The average of
the 12 slides is the test result. 100% is optimum.
b. Redeposition index: is calculated for each clean slide. The
average of the six is the test result. A redeposition index of 1.00
is optimum.
3. Formulas for calculation.
% Cleaning = (A-B)/(C-B) .times. 100%
Redeposition Index = D/C
a = reflectance washed soiled slide
B = Reflectance unwashed soiled slide
C = Reflectance unwashed unsoiled slide
D = Reflectance washed unsoiled slide
EXAMPLE XXIII
Water Softening Capability
When the polyelectrolyte of Example I is evaluated in water
softening ability by formulation of a variety of solutions of water
having relatively initial hardness and by measurement of the final
hardness with the soap lather method, the results are as shown in
Table 7. (See Betz Handbook of Water Conditioning 1947 Chapter 34,
Hardness, Soap Lather Method.)
Table 7
__________________________________________________________________________
WATER SOFTENING*
__________________________________________________________________________
Concen. Initial Hardness Final Hardness Hardness Compound (Wt. %)
(ppm CaCO.sub.3) (ppm CaCO.sub.3)* Removed (%)
__________________________________________________________________________
Sodium 0.1 520 254 51.2 Tripoly 0.05 520 480 7.7 Phosphate 0.025
520 510 1.9 Polyelectrolyte of Example I 0.1 520 220 57.7 0.5 520
260 50.0 0.025 520 265 49.0 75% Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 0.1 589 505 14.3
25% Tartaric 0.5 589 545 7.5 Acid 0.025 589 580 1.5 75% Na.sub.2
CO.sub.3 0.1 589 468 20.5 25% Gluconic 0.5 589 565 4.1 Acid 0.025
589 585 0.7 75% Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3 0.1 527 190 63.9 25% Sodium 0.5
527 244 53.7 Citrate 0.025 527 375 28.8
__________________________________________________________________________
* Soap-lather method. **Average value of triplicate analyses.
Modifications of the Invention
It should be understood that the invention is capable of a variety
of modifications and variations which will be made apparent to
those skilled in the art by a reading of the specification and
which are to be included within the spirit of the claims appended
hereto.
* * * * *