U.S. patent number 3,851,822 [Application Number 05/360,909] was granted by the patent office on 1974-12-03 for method for defogging a roadway, landing strip or the like.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Linde Aktiengesellschaft. Invention is credited to Anton Pocrnja, Heribeft Wenzel.
United States Patent |
3,851,822 |
Pocrnja , et al. |
December 3, 1974 |
METHOD FOR DEFOGGING A ROADWAY, LANDING STRIP OR THE LIKE
Abstract
A multiplicity of defogging devices, each having a closed
refrigeration system, are arranged in two rows on opposite sides of
an elongated strip to be maintained free from fog. The direction of
the jet of each individual defogging device is determined by the
wind direction and the location of the device in relation to the
rest of the defogging devices in its row. The strength of the jets
(outlet force or velocity) of the defogging devices of each row is
determined by the wind velocity. The ratio between the strength of
the jets of the defogging devices on the leeward side of the
covered region and the strength of the jets of the defogging
devices on the windward side thereof is higher than 1 and is
increased with increasing wind velocity.
Inventors: |
Pocrnja; Anton (Munich,
DT), Wenzel; Heribeft (Munich, DT) |
Assignee: |
Linde Aktiengesellschaft
(Wiesbaden, DT)
|
Family
ID: |
27184427 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/360,909 |
Filed: |
May 16, 1973 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
May 19, 1972 [DT] |
|
|
2224657 |
May 19, 1972 [DT] |
|
|
2224671 |
May 19, 1972 [DT] |
|
|
2224672 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
239/2.1; 62/282;
62/93 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A01G
15/00 (20130101); F24F 3/153 (20130101); E01H
13/00 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E01H
13/00 (20060101); A01G 15/00 (20060101); F24F
3/14 (20060101); F24F 3/12 (20060101); E01h
013/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;239/2R,14 ;98/1,DIG.1
;62/90,93,282,140,272 ;244/114
;55/267,268,269,467,385,1,222,DIG.29 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Talbert, Jr.; Dennis E.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Ross; Karl F. Dubno; Herbert
Claims
We claim:
1. A method of defogging an elongated region comprising the steps
of:
directing jets of air across said region from opposite longitudinal
sides thereof including, a windward and leeward side, and at spaced
apart locations along said sides;
dehumidifying at least some of said jets of air;
maintaining the strength of jets generally counter to the wind
direction greater than jets generally in the wind direction;
orienting at least one jet on each side generally parallel to the
wind direction; and
orienting jets on either side of said one jet at increasing angles
to the wind direction away from said one jet.
2. The method defined in claim 1 wherein the angle between two
outermost jets and said one jet on the leeward side is
approximately 20.degree. to 50.degree., and the angle between two
outermost jets and said one jet on the windward side is
approximately 10.degree. to 20.degree. larger than the
aforementioned angle on said leeward side.
3. The method defined in claim 2 wherein the ratio between the
total strength of the jets on said leeward side and the total
strength of the jets on said windward side is maintained larger
than 1 and is increased with increasing wind velocity.
4. The method defined in claim 1 wherein, when the wind velocity is
substantially zero, the direction of said one jet is oriented
substantially normal to said windward side of said region and the
direction of the corresponding opposite jet on said leeward side is
oriented substantially normal to said leeward side and the angle
between two outermost jets on both said sides is approximately
30.degree. to 60.degree.C.
5. The method defined in claim 1 wherein a jet is produced by a
defogging device comprising a reheater and a blower, said blower
being placed downstream of said reheater; and additional foggy air
is introduced into said defogging device between said reheater and
said blower, the amount of said additional foggy air being
controllable.
6. The method defined in claim 5, wherein the amount of introduced
foggy air is determined in response to the fog density of said
region.
7. The method defined in claim 5, wherein said defogging device
comprises a condenser upstream of said reheater, and the surface of
said condenser is sprayed with an antifreeze agent when the
temperature of said surface falls below 0.degree.C.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method of defogging the air in
an elongated region, e.g., the landing strip of an airport or a
roadway, with defogging and dehumidifying devices operating with a
refrigerant cycle.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Defogging and dehumidifying devices are known in which air of a
foggy region, generally with a relative humidity of 100 percent is
drawn into contact with a condenser and subsequently an reheater,
both of which are parts of a closed refrigeration system or
refrigerant cycle. The air leaves the defogging device as an
unsaturated and slightly heated air stream. The blower is disposed
in the downstream portion of the defogging device.
It is known in the art to use the above-described defogging devices
for the defogging of small regions. Humid air is passed through the
device and moisture in the foggy air is condensed or even frozen to
ice at a heat exchange in which the refrigerant is vaporized and
therefore abstracts heat from the humid air. In the downstream heat
exchanger, at which the refrigerant is condensed after compression,
the dehumidifier air recovers heat from the refrigerant. The air
stream which leaves the defogging device is thus unsaturated and
slightly warmer than the ambient foggy air.
This heat gain is a disadvantage in the known air-dehumidifiers for
closed rooms, and a heating of such rooms must be prevented by heat
removal. However, with the above-described defogging device the
heat gain may be somewhat advantageous since it allows ambient air
of a high relative humidity to mix with the unsaturated air and
maintain the region covered by the emerging air mixture free from
fog.
The temperature of the inlet and the outlet of a defogging device
can be adjusted when it is necessary to compensate for for varying
temperature and humidity of the ambient air to be be defogged.
The above-described defogging devices are highly effective for
limited areas, but do not fully meet the more stringent
requirements for large regions, i.e., airstrips of airports and
highway stretches. The reason for this is that the effectivity of
each individual defogging device and the joint defogging device is
detracted from by variations in climatic conditions, which seldom
are constant.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
The principal object of the invention is to provide an improved
method of defogging of large elongated regions effectively and to
thereby overcome the effects of variations in climatic conditions
which has hitherto inhibited the use of such conventional devices
using a closed refrigerant cycle.
It is also an object of this invention to accomplish an effective
defogging of large regions in an economic manner with respect to
capital expenditure and, especially, energy consumption.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The above-mentioned objects are realized in accordance with the
invention by a method comprising the following steps:
jets of dehumidified air from conventional defogging devices are
directed across a large elongated region from opposite longitudinal
sides thereof and at spaced locations along the sides;
the strength of jets which are generally counter to the wind
direction is maintained greater than jets generally in the wind
direction;
at least one jet on each side is oriented generally parallel to the
wind direction; and
jets on either side of the one jet on each longitudinal side of the
region, are oriented at increasing angles to the wind direction
away from the one jet on each longitudinal side.
It has been found that the foregoing objects can be attained by
providing a plurality of dehumidifying units on opposite
longitudinal sides of an elongated region to be maintained, free
from fog and directing jets of dehumidified air from these units
across the region which may be a landing strip or a roadway. Each
of the units comprises, as described, a blower inducing air flow
across a first heat exchanger which acts as a condenser/evaporator
and then across a second heat exchanger which acts as a
reheater/condenser, the heat exchangers being connected in a closed
refrigerant loop. In the first heat exchanger the liquefied
refrigerant is evaporated to cool the air to a temperature well
below the dewpoint and hence condense moisture from the air. In the
second heat exchanger the compressed refrigerant is liquefied or
condensed while the dehumidified air is reheated. It has been found
that, when the jet forces or strength is adjusted for the arrays of
dehumidifying units in accordance with the wind force or velocity,
and the orientations of the jets are regulated in accordance with
the wind direction, both preferably automatically, the
aforementioned disadvantages can be economically obviated.
With the process described the dehumidifying units are
systematically controlled in response to the most significant
climatic parameters, it being self-understood that an increase in
the humidity of the ambient air (i.e., its moisture content and
fogging potential) may automatically be detected to adjust the
ratio of dehumidified air mixed with the ambient, nondehumidified
air. It is indeed surprising, however, that the most detrimental
climatic conditions heretofore experienced in defogging selected
regions, namely the windspeed and direction, can be completely
compensated or rendered insignificant by the appropriate adjustment
of the jet direction and force.
It is, further, an important feature of the invention that the
orientation of each jet is determined, in part, by the orientation
of the adjacent jet or jets of the respective array and its
position in the array as discussed in greater detail below.
More specifically, a multiplicity of defogging devices are placed
in two substantially straight rows along the two longitudinal sides
of the large region. One defogging device in each row in the middle
thereof or substantially in the middle thereof is oriented to be
parallel to the wind direction. Defogging devices on each side of
these two devices are oriented at increasing angles to the wind
direction away from these two devices, the net result being two
fan-like patterns of jets when the defogging devices are
operated.
The defogging devices must in accordance with our invention be
operated systematically, due consideration being paid to those
climatic parameters which are of significance for defogging
operations. Thus, we quite surprisingly found that an effective,
reliable and uniform, defogging of a large region can only be
accomplished when the jet direction of the individual defogging
devices is determined by the wind direction and the jet strength of
the individual defogging devices are determined by the prevailing
wind velocity.
As indicated in the foregoing, when there is a prevailing wind
through the region to be defogged, the middle defogging device in
the row on the windward side of the region should be oriented in a
direction parallel to the wind direction, and the middle defogging
device in the row on the leeward side of the region in a direction
exactly opposite to the wind direction. In addition, the jets,
oriented generally in a fan pattern, on the windward side whould be
spread out more than the fan pattern of the jets on the leeward
side. More specifically, the angle between the two outermost jets
on the leeward side and the middle jet is approximately 20.degree.
to 50.degree., preferably 35.degree., and the angle between the two
outermost jets on the windward side and the corresponding middle
jet is approximately 10.degree. to 20.degree., preferably
15.degree., larger than the aforementioned angle on the leeward
side of the region.
When also the ratio of the total jet strength of the defogging
devices on the leeward side and the total jet strength of the
defogging devices on the windward side is carefully adjusted to a
value greater than 1, depending upon the prevailing wind strength,
surprisingly effective defogging of large elongated regions can be
accomplished.
When reference is made to a ratio of greater than unity for the jet
strength on opposite sides of the region, it is intended to so
indicate that the total force of the jets of the nozzles at one
side is greater than the total force of the jets at the other side.
The total force of the jets on the lee side is thus greater than
the total force of the jets on the windward side and this may be
accomplished where equal numbers of jets are provided on both
sides, by positioning the dehumidifying units directly opposite one
another and having the individual jet forces of opposite units in
the same ratio.
This method of defogging can of course also be used when it is
substantially calm, i.e., when the wind velocity is substantially
zero. The arrangement of the two rows of defogging devices will
then be symmetrical along a line connecting the midpoints of each
row of defogging devices. The direction of a middle jet in each row
is normal to the two longitudinal sides of the elongated region.
Further, the angle between two outermost jets and the corresponding
middle jet on either side of the region can be approximately
30.degree. to 60.degree., preferably 45.degree.C.
Another advantageous feature of this invention can be realized with
a defogging device having a condenser, a reheater and a blower, the
blower being downstream of the reheater and the reheater being
downstream of the condenser, and an air inlet tube between the
blower and the reheater, by introducing additional foggy air
through the inlet duct. The amount of such air is controllable by a
valve or shutter arrangement.
It is thereby possible to adjust the amount of air per unit time
which flows through the condenser and the reheater in relation to
the climatic variations of the region, and thereby limit the energy
consumption in the closed refrigeration system to what is
absolutely necessary for an effective defogging. This measure is of
particular value when the fog density is low and the full capacity
of the defogging device does not have to be used but when the wind
conditions are such that the jet strength of the defogging device
must exceed a minimum value.
It is particularly advantageous if the amount of the foggy air
introduced between the reheater and the blower can be automatically
controlled.
Energy utilization can also be improved considerably by spraying
the surface of the condenser with an antifreeze agent (e.g.,
ethyleneglycol) whenever ice formation appears thereon or the
surface tends to have a temperature below 0.degree.C. Such spraying
can also be done automatically by using a temperature sensing
device on the surface of the condenser.
The present method of defogging is particularly meritorious where
the elements of each defogging device can be automatically
controlled. Thus, we contemplate the use of several control
circuits. One of them consists of a wind-direction meter, a signal
converter with a calculator or computer connected thereto to
determine a suitable jet direction for each and all of the
defogging devices and drivers controlled thereby to orient the
defogging devices in their proper directions respectively. Another
control circuit consists of a wind-velocity meter, a signal
converter and calculator or computer to determine the required jet
strength of the defogging devices in each row respectively, and
drivers controlled thereby to adjust the jet strength of the
defogging devices in each row.
The terms calculator/computer and arithmetic unit are used herein
to refer to any conventional programming circuit having
predetermined thresholds or set-point values for each unit and a
number of positions thereof which are compared with the input value
and provide an output signal which is transmitted to the driver to
adjust the position of the nozzle until the input signal is brought
into conformity with the set-point signal and the output or error
signal is nullified. Suitable devices for this purpose are
described in SERVO-MECHANISM PRACTICE, McGraw-Hill Book Co.
N.Y.
The housing of a defogging device can, like conventional defogging
devices, have a housing with two open ends. The first element of
the defogging device upstream is the condenser, and downstream
there is provided in succession, the reheater and the blower as
mentioned in the foregoing. An inlet tube for the introduction of
additional foggy air is provided between the reheater and the
blower as indicated in the foregoing. The inlet tube has a
controllable closure member, preferably automatic. The closure
member can be automatically controlled by a fog-density meter, a
signal converter with an arithmetic unit and a driver actuating the
closure member of the inlet tube.
A liquid distributor for antifreeze agent placed in front of the
condenser preferably has spraying nozzles which uniformly
distribute antifreeze agent over the surface of the condenser
whenever ice formation on the surface of the condenser appears or
the temperature on the surface falls below 0.degree.C. A shut-off
valve or stopcock can be incorporated between the container of
antifreeze agent and the distributor, and, whenever a need for
antifreeze agent arises, the shut-off valve will be actuated
automatically, i.e., opened. The surface of the condenser can have
a thermoelement connected to a control switch and a driver
controlled thereby. The driver is actuated when the temperature on
the surface of the condenser falls below 0.degree.C.
The energy utilization and the effectivity of the defogging devices
of our invention can also be improved by providing a droplet
separator between the condenser and the reheater. The droplet
separator collects moisture which has not been collected in the
condenser. This double fog separation provides under unchanged
defogging capacity of the defogging device a decrease in the power
consumption of the closed refrigeration system. Such a decrease can
be more than 10 percent. It is preferable to also provide the
droplet separator with an antifreeze agent distributor, because ice
can also appear on it. Spraying nozzles can be used and a shut-off
valve for supply of antifreeze agent with an automatically
controlled driver for the shut-off valve.
The use of defogging systems of this invention as described in the
foregoing, e.g., on airstrips of airports, allows an automatic,
very reliable defogging, regardless of the climatic conditions and
swift variations encountered. An arrangement in accordance with
this invention with a multiplicity of defogging devices can be
modified by placing defogging devices with blowers without any
refrigeration elements built in or by inserting blowers without any
refrigeration elements between the defogging devices of the system,
especially when the fog density is low and the wind velocity is
high. The energy utilization and the effectivity of the defogging
system will thereby be considerably improved.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present
invention will become more readily apparent from the following
description, reference being made to the accompanying drawing in
which:
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic plan view which shows one arrangement of
defogging devices in accordance with our invention for defogging an
airstrip of an airport with a prevailing sidewind;
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic plan view which shows another arrangement
in accordance with the invention when the weather is calm;
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic plan view which shows another arrangement
in accordance with the invention, with a prevailing relatively
strong wind, approaching one of the longitudinal sides of the
airstrip at an angle of 60.degree.;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram which shows a control system used when
operating a defogging system in accordance with the invention;
and
FIG. 5 is an axial cross-sectional view, partly in diagrammatic
form which shows a defogging device in accordance with the
invention.
SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION
Referring now to FIG. 1, defogging (dehumidifying) devices 1-18 of
the invention (See FIG. 5) are arranged in two rows along the
longitudinal sides of elongated air strip 20. Foggy air is heated
in each defogging device 1-18 by means of a closed refrigeration
system, also converted to an unsaturated, dehumidified state, and
blown across air strip 20 by means of a blower. Such an open system
of working defogging devices 1-18 is of particular advantage. The
heat gain and the unsaturated state of the air leaving the
defogging device, in combination, makes possible not only defogging
of air passing through the defogging devices 1-18 but also the
defogging of considerable amounts of ambient foggy air with which
the heated dehumidified air comes in contact. Vectors at 19
indicate that a light side wind is prevailing, with a direction
normal to the long sides of airstrip 20.
The orientation of the jet of each individual defogging device 1-18
is determined by the direction 19 of the prevailing wind and by the
location of the defogging device in relation to other defogging
devices in its row. The jet direction of each individual defogging
device 1-18 is indicated by a vector, showing a direction as well
as a strength or a strength relation. According to a particularly
preferred embodiment of our invention, the jet directions of the
defogging devices 1-9 on the leeward side of air strip 20 are
arranged in such a way, that the direction of the middle defogging
device 5 is exactly opposite to the direction of the prevailing
wind 19, and the jet directions of devices 4-1 and 6-9 are oriented
on either side of device 5 at uniformly increasing angles to the
wind direction away from the jet direction of device 5. The two
outermost devices 1 and 9 of the row 1-9 have jets with a direction
which forms an angle of 35.degree. with the direction of the jet
coming from the middle device 5.
On the windward side of air strip 20, the jet of the middle
defogging device 14 is oriented in the direction 19 of the
prevailing wind across air strip 29, while the directions of the
jets of the rest of the defogging devices 13-10 and 15-18 are
arranged in the same manner as on the leeward side, with the
important exception that the angles between successive jet
directions to increase to a greater extent on the windward side
than the leeward side. Devices 10 and 18 in the row on the windward
side have jets with a direction which forms an angle of 50.degree.
with the direction of the jet of middle device 14.
The strengths of defogging devices 1-9 and 10-18 are determined by
the velocity of the prevailing wind. The strength and also the
direction of the wind are indicated by vectors 19. The side wind is
relatively slight, but its strength is reflected in a ratio between
the strengths of jets from devices 1-9 on the leeward side and the
strengths of jets from devices 9-18 on the windward side which is
larger than 1.
FIG. 2 illustrates how the defogging devices can be used when the
weather is calm. 18 defogging units (1-18) are used as in FIG. 1.
However, now the jet directions and the strengths of the individual
defogging devices can be arranged in a completely symmetrical
manner in relation to airstrip 20. Further, the angle between the
jets coming from uttermost defogging devices 1, 9, 10 and 18 and
the jets coming from the two middle defogging devices 5 and 14
respectively, can be approximately 45.degree.C.
FIG. 3 illustrates how the defogging devices can be arranged when a
rather strong sidewind is prevailing. Vectors 21 indicate the
direction of the wind, 60.degree. between the same and a long side
of the air strip 20, and its strength. 18 defogging devices (1-18)
are used as indicated in the foregoing. The jets of the two middle
defogging devices 5 and 14 are oriented in the wind direction,
while the jets of the lateral devices 4-1, 6-9, 10-13 and 15-18 are
oriented as indicated in the foregoing at increasing angles to the
wind direction away from the jets coming from devices 5 and 4
respectively. The directions of the jets of the two uttermost
defogging devices 1 and 9 on the leeward side of air strip 20 form
with the direction of the jet from device 5 and an angle of
35.degree.. On the windward side, the directions of the jets from
devices 10 and 18 form with the jet direction of device 14 an angle
of 50.degree..
FIG. 4 shows a particularly advantageous automatic arrangement to
be used to coordinate the functions of the individual defogging
devices in two rows along an elongated foggy region. For reason of
simplicity, only three defogging devices 22, 23 and 24 have been
selected to show how they can be automatically controlled by three
automatic systems. Such an arrangement for automatic control can of
course be extended to include all defogging devices used, in an
effort to defog a region, e.g., all 18 devices shown in FIG. 1.
Where desired, alternate devices or units 1-18 can simply be
blowers without refrigerating units.
The illustrated arrangement includes three metering devices or
meters, namely a wind direction meter 25, a wind velocity meter 26
and a fog density meter 27. Meter 25 is connected to a signal
converter 28 a signal which corresponds to the wind direction. The
signal is fed to a programmed arithmetic unit 29 which issues
signals to the three drivers 30 to individually determine the
directions of the three jets emerging from defogging devices 22, 23
and 24 respectively.
The wind velocity is determined with wind velocity meter 26 which
issues signals corresponding to the wind velocity to a second
signal converter 31. A second programmed arithmetic unit 32,
connected to meter 26, issues signals to drivers 33 so that the
strengths of the jets of defogging devices 22,23 and 24 can be
adjusted.
The fog density meter 27, e.g., an optical device, issues signals
corresponding to the prevailing fog density to a third signal
converter 34, which is connected to a third programmed arithmetic
unit 35. Drivers 36 are controlled by arithmetic unit 35 and
regulating in their turn the amount of ambient foggy air which can
be introduced between the evaporator and the blower of each
individual defogging device 22-24. Such automatic control is
particularly advantageous when the fog density is small and the
wind is strength so that the energy utilization of the total
defogging arrangement can be optimized.
FIG. 5 shows a defogging device in accordance with the invention,
comprising a housing 41, a condenser 42, a reheater 43, and a
blower 44, taken in the downstream order. Housing 41 is open at the
upstream as well as the downstream sides. Foggy air enters at 45
into housing 41, passes condenser 42, resulting in water
condensation due to refrigeration, passes reheater 43 resulting in
heating and leaves housing 41 at 46 dry and warm. The air at 46 is
warmer than the foggy air entering housing 41 at 45 and is
unsaturated. Thus, it has capability to defog ambient foggy air
which has not passed any of the defogging devices in the
arrangement. Condenser 42 and reheater 43 are integrated elements
of a closed refrigeration system comprising also a refrigerant
compresser 48 and an expansion valve 49.
Housing 41 has an inlet tube 37 for the introduction of additional
ambient air between reheater 43 and blower 44. Inlet tube 37 has a
closure member 38 which controls the amount of additional air,
e.g., a shutter which varies the open cross-section of inlet tube
37. It is particularly advantageous to actuate closure member 38
with a driver 36 which is controlled by an arithmetic unit 35.
Arithmetic unit 35 can be programmed by a calibration process to
arrive at optimal adjustments of closure member 38. Signals are
issued to arithmetic unit 35 by a signal converter 34, which
receives primary signals from a density meter 27, e.g., an optical
device.
This system, comprising the elements 27 and 34-38, allows the
maintenance of a constant strength of the jet leaving housing 41 at
46. The energy utilization as far as the closed refrigeration
system 47 is concerned can thereby be varied and optimized.
According to another preferred feature of this invention, a liquid
distributor 50 with spraying nozzles 51 can be placed upstreams of
condenser 42 to distribute an antifreeze agent onto the surface of
condenser 42. Supply container 52 is filled with antifreeze agent,
e.g., a 20 percent water solution of ethylene glycol. The conduit
connecting container 52 and distributor 50 can have a closure
member 53, e.g., a stopcock, which is actuated when the surface
temperature of condenser 42 falls below 0.degree.C. Stopcock 53 can
be actuated with driver means 54, which opens or closes stopcock 53
when thermoelement 56 registers allowable and not allowable
temperatures, respectively, of the condenser surface and signal
transmitter 55 converts these registrations to signals which
control driver means 54.
FIG. 5 shows also a droplet separator 57 between condenser 42 and
reheater 43. Droplet separator 57 is, like condenser 42, provided
with a deicing device. Liquid distributor 58 has spraying nozzles
59, a closure member 60 controlled by a driver 61, a signal
transmitter 62 and a thermoelement 63.
FIG. 5 also shows a storage sump 64 under condenser 42 and droplet
separator 57 to collect condensed and melted water. It is provided
with an outlet 65.
The energy consumption and the cost are surprisingly low when
arrangements of defogging devices as described in the foregoing are
used. Hence, such arrangements have proved to be most valuable for
defogging large regions such as air strips on airports and
stretches of highways, where energy utilization becomes extremely
important. Also, our defogging devices do not constitute any
environmental threat. They do not emit any dangerous substances or
particles whatsoever to the ambient air.
EXAMPLE
A space which is defogged by the method of the invention can be
compared to a solid body around which a stream of air flows. To
illustrate this, 10 defogging devices are lined up in two rows at a
temperature of 10.degree.C. The passage of air through each
defogging device is 200 kg/sec. and the total passage of air is
thus 2000 kg/sec. The total energy consumption of the ten devices,
including refrigeration systems and blowers, is 3600 kW. The
following table shows the results obtained, with such an
arrangement and under such conditions:
g 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
__________________________________________________________________________
V 179.times.10.sup.6 92.times.10.sup.6 63.5.times.10.sup.6
49.times.10.sup.6 40.4.times.10.sup.6 V.sub.2 /V.sub.1 30 15 10 7.5
6 q 0.017 0.034 0.049 0.063 0.077
__________________________________________________________________________
The abbreviations in the Table have the following meanings:
g = amount of water in fog droplets per m.sup.3 in gram;
V = amount of defogged air in m.sup.3 per hour;
V.sub.1 = amount of air passing the ten defogging devices per
hour;
V.sub.2 = amount of defogged air in excess of amount defogged in
the defogging devices per hour;
q = energy consumption in kilo calories per m.sup.3 defogged
air.
0.1 g water per m.sup.3 in the form of fog droplets corresponds to
a light fog with a visual range of 100 m, while 0.4 g corresponds
to a dense fog with a visual range of 12 m.
In one defogging device according to our invention the amount of
passing air is 200 kg/sec and the ambient temperature is
2.degree.C. The fog density is 0.2 g water per m.sup.3 air during
one study, corresponding to a visual range of 60 m. 1500 kg/sec
foggy air which is not passing the device is also defogged when it
comes in contact with defogged air leaving the device. The surface
temperature of condenser 42 and droplet separator 57 is
-2.degree.C, the temperature of reheater 43 is 8.degree.C, and the
temperature of the defogged air when it leaves the device is
5.degree.C.
When inlet tube 37 is closed and no antifreeze agent is used, the
total energy consumption, including the energy necessary for
driving the blower, is 360 kW. This energy consumption can be
lowered to 290 kW, i.e., with approximately 20 percent, without
varying the resulting total amount of defogged air, by opening the
inlet tube 37 for the introduction of additional air, so that the
total amount of air to be defogged does not pass through condenser
42, and by preventing an ice formation from appearing on condenser
42 by spraying antifreeze agent thereon.
The inlet tube 37 is opened to such an extent that 60 kg/sec.
additional foggy air is introduced therethrough, while 140 kg/sec.
air passes through condenser 42. This lowering of the energy
consumption can be improved still further when the fog density is
slight.
When a deicing system of described type is not used under the same
weather conditions, an icing of condenser 42 and droplet separator
57 occurs already after a running time of 0.5 hour, and a
switch-off and a deicing of the device has to be done. Also, the
energy consumption of the device must be increased when the amount
of ice of condenser 42 and droplet separator 57 increases to
maintain the initial defogging capacity of the device. However,
when a deicing device as described in the foregoing is used, the
defogging device can be operated continuously for a long time
without increasing the energy consumption.
* * * * *