U.S. patent number 3,847,383 [Application Number 05/420,718] was granted by the patent office on 1974-11-12 for document feeding device.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Burroughs Corporation. Invention is credited to James R. Hunter, S. James Lazzarotti, Robert W. Rodkey, Edward A. Wojtowicz.
United States Patent |
3,847,383 |
Wojtowicz , et al. |
November 12, 1974 |
DOCUMENT FEEDING DEVICE
Abstract
The present disclosure describes apparatus and techniques for
creating a high-speed singulated flow of documents, such as mail
pieces from a stack of said documents, in order that they may be
subsequently identified and sorted to their proper destinations.
The problem of double-feeding is virtually eliminated by the
multiple restraint schemes provided by the present feeder. In
particular, the device incorporates means whereby the documents to
be processed are made to enter a channel formed between moving feed
belts and a pivoting gate. The latter forms an extension of the
registration wall along which documents to be fed are aligned, and
incorporates within itself vacuum braking means. The pivoting gate
member provides both a barrier restraint and a frictional restraint
which act concurrently on the second or double document to stop it
as it moves toward the conveyor transport system along with the
document desired to be fed out of the stack.
Inventors: |
Wojtowicz; Edward A. (Bryn
Mawr, PA), Lazzarotti; S. James (Broomall, PA), Hunter;
James R. (Chadds Ford, PA), Rodkey; Robert W. (Exton,
PA) |
Assignee: |
Burroughs Corporation (Detroit,
MI)
|
Family
ID: |
23667576 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/420,718 |
Filed: |
November 30, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
271/11; 271/104;
271/167; 271/34 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B65H
3/124 (20130101); B65H 3/46 (20130101); B65H
2301/321 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B65H
3/46 (20060101); B65H 3/12 (20060101); B65h
005/08 () |
Field of
Search: |
;271/11,104,106,34,137,121,167 ;209/73 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Knowles; Allen N.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Varallo; Francis A. Feeney, Jr.;
Edward J. Fiorito; Edward G.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A document feeding device comprising:
a feeder vacuum chamber operatively connected to generate an area
of low atmospheric pressure adjacent a face portion thereof,
at least a single moving perforated feed belt operatively connected
to contiguously traverse said face portion of said feeder vacuum
chamber,
a registration wall situated in predetermined angular relationship
to the face portion of said feeder vacuum chamber for enabling
substantial alignment of the forward edges of the documents prior
to their being fed,
a gate member pivotally mounted to provide a substantially coplanar
extension of said registration wall, the face portion of said gate
member being positioned in close proximity to said moving feed belt
and forming therewith a channel through which said documents to be
fed are driven by said belt, said gate member acting as a barrier
restraint upon a double document to impede its exit from the
feeder,
said gate member including additional vacuum chamber means
operatively connected to generate an area of low atmospheric
pressure adjacent its face portion, the gate member vacuum force
acting as a frictional restraint upon said double document to
impede its exit from the feeder, said barrier and frictional
restraints being exerted concurrently on said double document by
said gate member to effectively prevent the untimely feeding of
said double document.
2. A document feeding device as defined in claim 1 further
characterized in that the vacuum force present at the face portion
of the gate vacuum chamber is less than that present at the face
portion of said feeder vacuum chamber.
3. A document feeding device as defined in claim 2 wherein the
minimum dimension of said channel is approximately the average
width of the documents being fed.
4. A document feeding device as defined in claim 3 further
including a tension spring coupled to said gate member and biased
to pivot said member in a direction to maintain a predetermined
minimum channel dimension.
5. A document feeding device as defined in claim 4 further
including a pair of acceleration rollers located downstream from
said gate member for receiving in turn the documents being driven
thereto by said feed belt.
6. A document feeding device as defined in claim 5 wherein said
vacuum chambers are coupled to each other by a flexible tube,
whereby the vacuum pressure for said gate vacuum chamber is derived
from that of said feeder vacuum chamber.
7. A document feeding device as defined in claim 6 further
characterized in that said feed belt is perforated in a square hole
pattern to optimize the vacuum driving force applied to said
documents.
8. A document feeding device as defined in claim 7 wherein said
documents are mail pieces and said minimum channel dimension is
approximately 0.150 inches.
9. A document feeding device as defined in claim 8 further
including a plurality of pusher fingers positioned adjacent said
face portion of said feeder vacuum chamber and being intermeshed
with said feed belt, said pusher fingers being capable of assuming
either of two positions comprising respectively an extended
position above and a retracted position below the surface of said
feed belt, the former position inhibiting contact of the document
with said feed belt, and the latter position permitting contact
therewith.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The document processing system of which the present invention is a
significant part also includes means for preparing the documents
prior to feeding. To the extent that copending application Ser. No.
365,475, "Document Edging and Stack Advance System," by S. J.
Lazzarotti, et al., describes such means, it is cross-referenced
herein. The latter application and the present one are assigned to
a common assignee. Certain prior art techniques in document
singulation are also found in Canadian Pat. No. 567,020,
"Paper-Handling Apparatus," by P. H. Wendt, et al., and this patent
is referred to hereinafter.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Many document feeders are in use which utilize vacuum forces to
singulate or feed documents, such as mail pieces, one at a time
from a stack. The strength of the vacuum forces employed in these
feeders represents a compromise between the high vacuum force
needed to feed heavy documents, with possible double feeds of
lighter documents; and the lighter force needed for the latter
documents which is insufficient to handle the heavier pieces. The
search for an optimum feeder device to minimize both double feeds
and skip feeds has continued for many years. For example in the
reference Canadian patent a mechanism is provided on one side of
the stack of documents which applies a suction or opposing vacuum
pressure thereto in order to prevent more than one document from
being drawn upward by the primary vacuum force associated with the
feed drum. However, multiple feeds still occur with this type of
feeder because the high strength of the primary force utilized
results in a bleed-through force capable of attracting multiple
relatively porous documents. Obviously documents having
perforations therein, such as checks, are highly susceptible to
multiple feeds. Moreover, the opposing vacuum force affecting the
documents residing in the stack prior to feeding is often
insufficient to separate those documents clinging to each other by
adhesive and electrostatic forces.
The present invention virtually eliminates the problem of multiple
feeds by utilizing combined barrier and vacuum braking restraints
which halt the second or double document after it has left the
stack and before it can contact the transport means toward which it
is being driven by the feeder belts.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, the problem of
multiple-feeds inherent in high vacuum systems is solved by
providing a channel between the moving feeder belts and a pivoting
gate, which is an extension of the side registration wall along
which the documents waiting to be fed are aligned. The width of the
channel is chosen such that the gate acts as a barrier to a double
document attempting to exit the feeder. The primary feeder vacuum
drives the document to be fed along with the double to the gate
where the latter pivots, if necessary, just enough to strip the
double from the document being fed. This pivoting action also
permits single documents of greater width than the aforementioned
channel to exit the feeder. The barrier restraint is augmented by
vacuum singulation provided by the pivoting gate itself. Thus, the
gate forms a vacuum chamber supplied by the primary feeder vacuum
which exerts a secondary vacuum force, considerably less than the
primary force, upon the documents passing adjacent thereto. This
secondary force while producing only a negligible effect upon a
single document under control of the primary force, is nevertheless
sufficient to brake to a stop and separate any double document from
the document being fed.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become
apparent in the detailed description appearing hereinafter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a plan view of the document feeder.
FIG. 2 depicts a vertical elevation of the feeder as viewed from
the rear.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1 depicts the basic elements which make up the feeder device
of the present invention. A stack of documents 10 which may be mail
pieces are depicted in position to be fed by the feeder. The arrow
12 indicates the direction of feed of the documents being
processed. It may be assumed that the documents have arrived at the
point shown in FIG. 1 by virtue of a stack advance system, such as
that described in the reference copending application Ser. No.
365,475. In accordance with the techniques taught in the latter
application, the stack advance has been halted through the
operation of the stack sensing switch actuators 14 and 16. The
documents 10 waiting to be fed are generally edged against
registration wall 15 and are being restrained from contacting the
feeder belts 18 by pusher fingers 20. Air flow created by a blower
system (not shown) and routed to the feeder housing 22 which
includes a vacuum chamber, exerts a vacuum pressure on the document
waiting to be fed which pulls it against the pusher fingers 20.
When it is desired to initiate document feeding, the pusher fingers
20 are retracted behind the feeder belts 18 as indicated by the
dashed outline 20a of the fingers. The pusher fingers 20 are shown
in FIG. 2 attached to rotary solenoid 24 by shaft 26 and coupling
28. With continued reference to FIG. 1, the vacuum pressure exerted
on the first document flexes a portion of the document about a
pivot point located at the buffer plate 30. The buffer plate
prevents contact of the document with the moving belts until
substantially the entire angle has been traversed. This prevents
any premature motion of the document in the direction of arrow 12.
Once the flexure angle has been attained, the document contacts the
moving feeder belts 18. These belts are perforated with a square
hole pattern 32 (as seen in FIG. 2) which appears to provide an
optimum driving force for the document being fed. The belts are
contiguous with the face of the vacuum chamber and air entering the
chamber passes through the belt perforations. The document forced
against the feeder belts is accelerated in the direction of arrow
12. The belts are driven by pulleys 34 (as seen in FIG. 2), while
idlers 36 and 38 (FIG. 1) provide the geometry for proper contact
with the face of the vacuum chamber.
The moving document is now made to enter a channel 40 of minimum
dimension "A" which is formed between the moving feeder belts 18
and a pivoting gate 42 which is a substantially coplanar extension
of the inner surface of registration wall 18 and provides vacuum
singulation. The vacuum pressure for the gate singulator 42 may be
derived from the main feeder vacuum chamber in housing 22 through
the use of a flexible tube 43 coupling ports 44 and 46. Also as
indicated, the singulator has the capability of pivoting in order
to increase the channel 40 dimension "A." The pivoting takes place
in the direction of arrow 48 about point 50. Tension spring 52
permits the singulator 42 to return to the position shown, after a
document is fed. The purpose of the singulator is to exert a small
force via port 53 on a doubled document to prevent its entry in the
acceleration rollers 54. The channel dimension is chosen to be such
that the working face of the singulator will be in close proximity
to a double document attempting to leave the feeder. For example, a
dimension of approximately 0.150 inches has proved satisfactory in
an actual operative embodiment for handling mail pieces. Single
documents of thicknesses approaching the selected minimum channel
dimension also contact the singulator 42, and in this special case
the singulator acts to slightly retard the acceleration of the
document. Although this would seem to be a detrimental effect, the
overall effect is negligible because the gate singulator vacuum
force is much smaller than the main driving force of the feeder
vacuum chamber.
Since the minimum channel dimension "A" is chosen to be less than
the maximum single document thickness expected to be processed,
documents thicker than the minimum channel dimension must increase
the channel width in order to exit the feeder. The force of the
vacuum applied through feeder belts drives the document against the
singulator gate 42, compressing spring 52 to a point which permits
passage of the document. The pivoting action creates a stripping
action which acts in a manner to separate double documents. In
effect, the pivoting gate 42 creates a barrier restraint which in
itself is a singulation method and enhances or augments the
frictional restraint supplied by the vacuum singulator.
Once the feeder has advanced the document to the acceleration
rollers 54, the pusher fingers 20 are required to be extended to
inhibit the feeding of succeeding documents until the system is
capable of processing them. This return motion is supplied by
return spring 56 (FIG. 2) located in proximity to the rotary
solenoid coupling 28. When the solenoid 24 is energized to retract
the fingers, this spring is extended. De-energization of the
solenoid permits the spring energy to return the fingers to their
extended condition. With specific reference to FIG. 1, the
de-energization of the solenoid 24 is effected by the documents
leading edge as it breaks the light beam from lamp 58 directed
toward photocell 60. The photocell 60 is positioned such that the
light beam is interrupted only when the document has entered the
acceleration rollers 54. The document must be under control of the
rollers before it is stripped from the feeder belts by the
extension of pusher fingers 20.
In the elimination of double feeds by the use of vacuum singulation
in a pivoting gate member, certain geometric aspects of the feeder
design are of interest. With reference to FIG. 1, the dimension
"B," the distance from the point of common tangency of rollers 54
to the inner surface of registration wall 15 is significant. The
larger dimension "B" is made, the more effective the vacuum
singulator gate 42 becomes, since more time is available for the
vacuum retarding forces to operate on the doubled document.
Documents halted by the singulator, are permitted to enter the
transport system on the next feed cycle. Since these documents are
already partially singulated from the rest of the stack, the
probability of doubling on this last mentioned cycle is very
small.
The maximum length of dimension "B" is determined by the dimension
"C" which as seen in FIG. 1 is the distance from the acceleration
rollers 54 to the end of the vacuum chamber in housing 22. This
last dimension must be greater than the minimum length document. If
it is not, pickup of more than one document during a feed cycle is
possible before effective inhibiting by fingers 20 can take
place.
Another geometrical aspect of importance is dimension "D," FIG. 1.
This is the distance from the closest edge of the vacuum chamber
orifice to the registration wall 15. This dimension is significant
in respect to initially mis-registered documents. The greater
dimension "D" is, the less likely that two documents will overlap
the vacuum chamber and be accelerated out together, creating a
"double." In general, dimension "D" is designed to be a maximum
within the constraints of dimension "C" (not to exceed the minimum
document length) and dimension "E" (adequate to obtain the required
acceleration forces for a specified feed rate).
In summary, it is apparent that the more restraint schemes that
documents are exposed to in the feeding process, the lower the
doubles rate and the more effective the process of singulation. The
feeder described herein has registered an extremely low doubles
rate in actual operating tests as a result of the multiple
restraints incorporated therein.
First, the pivoting gate portion of the registration wall functions
as a barrier restraint. Vacuum bleed through forces are not great
enough on a double document to permit it to open the spring loaded
pivoting wall. However, a thick single document when acted upon by
the primary feeder vacuum forces is capable of pivoting the gate to
enlarge the exit channel.
Second, the vacuum braking force within the pivoting gate, causes a
frictional restraint to be imposed upon the double document. The
braking force is of such strength that it is able to stop the
document at a point past the registration wall but before it can
enter the acceleration rollers of the transport system. By virtue
of the vacuum force and the coefficient of friction, the brake
prevents the second document from moving with the document desired
to be fed.
Finally, a gravity restraint is present as a result of the backward
tilt condition (the top edge of the document being displaced
backward from the bottom edge) induced in the document stack by the
initial biasing of the documents and the application of the sensing
switches as taught in the reference copending application. When the
first document is drawn against the feeder face by the primary
vacuum force, a lesser force, perhaps due to a transient partial
vacuum generated between the first and second document tends to
cause the latter to move with the former. The gravity restraint on
the second tilted-back document is greater than the aforementioned
partial vacuum force, and the second document remains in place.
If the stack assumes a forward tilt geometry, the frictional
resistance to movement of the lower edge of the document to the
feeder face is overcome by the primary feeder vacuum force in the
case of the first document, but such frictional restraint prevents
movement of the second document along with the first.
In conclusion, the inventive concepts and implementations described
herein have proved highly satisfactory in actual operative systems
in which the doubles rate experienced in actual tests was
approximately 0.2 percent. It should be understood that changes and
modifications of the feeder may be needed to suit particular
requirements. Such changes and modifications insofar as they are
not departures from the true scope of the invention, are intended
to be covered by the claims appended hereto.
* * * * *