U.S. patent number 3,844,494 [Application Number 05/328,841] was granted by the patent office on 1974-10-29 for hammer mill rotor assembly.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Ferromet, Inc.. Invention is credited to William G. Hightower.
United States Patent |
3,844,494 |
Hightower |
October 29, 1974 |
HAMMER MILL ROTOR ASSEMBLY
Abstract
In a hammer mill having a rotatable shaft with outwardly
extending arms mounted to rotate with the shaft, swing hammers are
pivotally secured to the outer ends of the arms and off the radial
center line of the arms toward the direction of shaft rotation so
that each hammer leads the adjacent portion of its respective arm
to protect the arm from wear. A replaceable cap is disposed over
the leading edge of the arm to further protect it from wear, and a
replaceable head is mounted on each hammer so the head can be
quickly replaced when worn to maintain hammer weight.
Inventors: |
Hightower; William G. (Upland,
CA) |
Assignee: |
Ferromet, Inc. (Etiwanda,
CA)
|
Family
ID: |
23282681 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/328,841 |
Filed: |
February 1, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
241/197;
241/194 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B02C
13/28 (20130101); B23D 31/002 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B23D
31/00 (20060101); B02C 13/28 (20060101); B02C
13/00 (20060101); B02c 003/04 (); B02c
013/28 () |
Field of
Search: |
;241/191,194,195,197,193 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lake; Roy
Assistant Examiner: Desmond; E. F.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Christie, Parker & Hale
Claims
I claim:
1. In a hammer mill having a rotatable shaft, the improvement
comprising an elongated rotor arm mounted on the shaft to extend
radially from the shaft and rotate with it, a hammer disposed
adjacent the outer end of the arm, means for securing the hammer to
the arm so the hammer projects beyond the outer end of the arm and
ahead of the leading edge of the arm when the shaft is rotated, the
hammer including separate head and body portions which overlap in
the direction of shaft rotation and each have collinear holes
extending through them in the direction substantially parallel to
the axis of shaft rotation, and a retaining pin extending through
the collinear holes in the overlapping portions of the hammer head
and body to secure them together, the pin being positioned so that
when the shaft is rotated the pin is prevented from movement along
its axis by the adjacent motor arms between which the hammer is
secured, the location of the retaining pin with respect to the
pivot point for the hammer being such that when the shaft does not
rotate and the hammer is rotated about its pivot point, the pin
moves clear of the rotor arms so it can be moved longitudinally to
permit the hammer head to be removed from the hammer body.
2. A hammer mill having a rotatable shaft, an elongated rotor arm
mounted on the shaft to extend radially from the shaft and rotate
with it, a hammer mounted on the outer end of the arm, and a
replaceable shoe secured over the leading edge of the rotor arm and
its outer end.
3. Apparatus according to claim 2 in which the arm includes a hole
extending in the same general direction as the shaft, and the shoe
includes an inwardly extending portion with a hole collinear with
the hole in the arm, and a retaining pin extending through the
collinear holes to secure the shoe to the arm.
4. Apparatus according to claim 2 in which the shoe covers the
leading edge and adjacent sides of the rotor arm at its outer end.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to hammer mills used to shred or
disintegrate solid materials, and is especially suited to break up
scrap automobiles, loose sheet metal, stoves, washing machines, and
other appliances which include a substantial amount of steel or
sheet metal.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Rotary hammer mills have been used for a number of years as
disintegrators to crush and pulverize solid materials such as ore,
coal, asphalt, bone, clam shells, and the like.
More recently, hammer mills have been used to shred scrap steel,
particularly automobile bodies because shredded automobile scrap is
superior to automobile scrap prepared by other methods, such as,
compressing or shearing. The shredded scrap is superior because
shredding produces smaller pieces and facilitates the separation of
the ferrous material from the non-ferrous, which accounts for about
20 percent of a typical scrapped automobile. U.S. Pat. No.
3,545,690 discloses a hammer mill installation for shredding
automobile bodies. As disclosed in that patent, the automobile
bodies slide down a chute into a rotary hammer mill which includes
a heavy shaft rotated at a relatively high speed by a powerful
electric motor. Radially extending arms are secured to the shaft to
rotate with it. The arms are usually arranged in two sets, the arms
in one set being parallel to each other and mounted on the shaft at
longitudinally spaced locations to be perpendicular to the arms in
the second set. Arms in each set are located alternately along the
shaft. Swing hammers are pivotally secured to the outer ends of the
rotor arms to travel at high speed around a circular path known as
the "hammer circle." Material fed into the mill enters the hammer
circle where the fast moving hammers strike and disintegrate the
material. The hammers are free to swing through more than
360.degree. so if they strike material which does not immediately
disintegrate, they can swing back out of the way. The free swinging
hammers tend to continue to rotate about their respective pivot
points after striking a refractory piece of scrap. This wastes
power, makes the machine less effective, and subjects the ends of
the rotor arms carrying the hammers to excessive wear because the
arms, instead of the hammers, strike the material.
In the prior art hammer mill, the hammers are relatively small and
located on the center line of the rotor arms, where they provide
little or no protection for the arms, especially after the hammers
lose weight by attrition and are more frequently knocked backward
around the pivot point where they are secured to the arms. Thus,
the more worn the hammers, the less effective the machine, and the
faster the wear of the rotor arms. After an arm is sufficiently
worn to threaten structural failure, the machine must be shut down,
and the arm rebuilt. This is often done by welding a "hard facing"
material on the leading edge and outer end of the arm until the arm
is substantially restored to its original dimension. The hard
facing material is expensive, and so is the labor required to apply
it. The lost production during the shutdown of the machine also
adds to the final cost of the product.
Machine efficiency is improved by replacing worn hammers, but in
the prior art hammer mills, a hammer is replaced by withdrawing a
retaining rod or pin which extends through collinear holes in the
set of arms on which the worn hammer is mounted. This requires the
removal and reinstallation of all hammers, whether they are worn or
not. Consequently, worn hammers are often left in operation beyond
the optimum because of the extra work involved in handling hammers
which may not be worn. This not only reduces the effectiveness of
the machine, but also accelerates rotor arm wear.
This invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art hammer
mills by using much larger hammers, and mounting them off the
radial center line of the rotors in the direction of shaft
rotation. In operation, centrifugal force holds the large hammers
extended out to a working position where they cover and protect the
leading edges of the rotors. The greater mass of the hammers
increases the disintegrating power of the equipment, and results in
less swinging back of the hammers. The larger hammers are secured
to the rotor arms so the hammers cannot swing freely. Instead, the
backface of a recoiling hammer strikes an adjacent arm, and is not
only prevented from rotating through more than about 120.degree.,
but is immediately bounced back into the working or disintegrating
position. This makes the machine more effective, and reduces wear
of the rotor arms. A replaceable shoe is disposed over the leading
edge of each rotor arm to provide additional protection from random
contact with disintegrated pieces within the hammer mill, and to
protect the arm when the hammer may be momentarily driven away from
the working position. When the shoe is sufficiently worn, it is
quickly and easily replaced, thus eliminating the more expensive
hard facing process previously used to rebuild a worn rotor
arm.
This invention also provides a replaceable head which can be
removably secured to and removed from the leading portion of a
hammer body without having to disturb any other hammer in the
machine. This facilitates quick replacement of only the worn hammer
or hammers, so machine efficiency stays high and labor is
minimized.
The improved rotor assembly of this invention has reduced
operating, labor, and material costs by about 62 percent compared
to the hammer mill described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,545,690. The
location of the larger hammers to protect the leading edges of the
rotor arms has increased the shredding machine rotor life by at
least 40 percent. The heavier hammers have also made the prior art
shredding machine capable of producing about 25 percent more scrap
in the same amount of time and using less electrical power than
with the smaller hammers.
Thus, the improved rotor assembly of this invention enables the
production of more tons of scrap per pound of weight loss of
hammers and rotor arms. These results are obtained because the
larger hammers are much heavier and do not swing as freely away
from the work load, therefore cutting more material in the same
motion than the smaller hammers, and at the same time protecting
the leading edge of the rotor arms. Moreover, the larger hammers
wear less because they soon become work hardened due to the impact
of the work. Consequently, the larger hammers have a much longer
life than would be expected just from the increase in weight.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Briefly, this invention provides an improved rotor assembly for a
hammer mill which has a rotatable shaft. The improvement includes
an elongated rotor arm mounted on the shaft to extend radially from
the shaft and rotate with it. The arm includes means for securing a
swing hammer to the arm to pivot about an axis substantially
parallel to the axis of shaft rotation. The pivot axis of the
hammer is located off the radial center line of the arm towards the
direction of shaft rotation. The hammer is secured to the arm to
pivot about the pivot means, and be held by centrifugal force, when
the shaft rotates, in a position where the hammer is ahead of the
leading edge of the arm and thereby protects the arm during
operation of the mill.
Preferably, a replaceable shoe is mounted on the leading edge of
the rotor arm at its outer end to provide additional protection for
the arm. The preferred form of the invention also includes a
replaceable head mounted on the hammer so that when the head is
worn it can be removed and replaced with a new head without
removing the hammer from its pivot point, and without disturbing
any other hammers in the mill.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a transverse sectional elevation taken perpendicular to
the axis of shaft rotation of the preferred rotor assembly of this
invention; and
FIG. 2 is a fragmentary view taken on line 2--2 of FIG. 1.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
A horizontal rotatable shaft 10 mounted in a hammer mill (not
shown), which may be of the conventional type disclosed in U.S.
Pat. No. 3,545,690, carries a first set of radially extending arms
12 spaced at equal intervals longitudinally along the shaft and
secured by a key 13 to rotate with the shaft. A second set of
radially extending arms 14 are mounted on the shaft so that each
arm in the second set is disposed between a pair of adjacent rotor
arms in the first set. The arms in the second set are secured by a
key 16 to the shaft so the arms rotate with the shaft. The arms in
each set are parallel to each other, and are perpendicular to the
arms in the other set. Each arm is a generally rectangular and
rigid plate with a hole 18 in its center making a close fit around
the shaft. The corners of the arms are slightly rounded.
As viewed in FIG. 1, the shaft and rotor arms turn in a clockwise
direction. A separate mounting hole 19 extends through each arm
adjacent its leading edge, and is thus displaced from the radial
center line of the arm toward the direction of shaft rotation, and
located about one-third of the arm radius in from the outer end of
the arm. The mounting holes in each set of arms are collinear,
lined with a hardened bushing 20, and receive a mounting rod or pin
21 which extends through mounting holes and through a hardened
bushing 22 in a hole 23 in the inner end of a respective hammer 24
pivotally secured between adjacent arms in each set. Each hammer is
generally bell-shaped as viewed in FIG. 1, and extends a
substantial distance beyond the adjacent ends of the respective set
of arms to which it is mounted.
The hardened bushings in the rotor arms and the hammers extend the
operating life of those components because the bushings help
prevent "spreading" of the metal due to the force which is applied
in substantially the same direction during the operation of the
equipment. This is particularly true when manganese alloy is used
for the hammers, because it tends to spread until it is
sufficiently "work hardened."
When the shaft is turned at a relatively high speed, say 600 to 800
r.p.m., the hammers are held outwardly in the solid line positions
shown in FIG. 1 with a strong centrifugal force which ordinarily
makes them perform as though they were rigidly secured to the arms
in the positions shown, and the tips of the hammers sweep at high
speed through a circular path known as the "hammer circle."
Material to be shredded is fed down a conventional chute (not
shown) into the path of the swinging hammers. The typical prior art
hammers weigh about 250 pounds each, but by mounting the hammers of
this invention somewhat back from the ends of the rotor arms, the
size of the hammers can be increased to where they weigh about 380
pounds each without changing the overall dimensions of conventional
mills. This increase in hammer mass greatly improves the
disintegrating power of the machine. However, if one of the hammers
strikes a portion of scrap which resists immediate disintegration,
the hammer is free to rotate backwards (counterclockwise about its
pivot, as viewed in FIG. 1) approximately 100.degree. about its
pivot point to the phantom line position 24' shown for the hammer
on the right side of FIG. 1. The hammer does not swing back more
than about 100.degree. because its rear face strikes the edge of
the arm 12 sandwiched between the pair of arms 14 which carry the
hammer. Thus, the hammer is bounded back immediately into the
working position instead of ineffectively rotating in a
counterclockwise (as viewed in FIG. 1) direction around its pivot
point. Moreover, the hammers in their respective working positions
are ahead of the forward and outer edges of the rotor arms so that
those portions of the rotor arms are protected from substantial
direct or initial contact with the material fed into the mill. If
the hammers were free to rotate freely about their pivot points
through 360.degree., the rotor arms would be subjected to
substantial wear, which not only would result in inefficient
shredding, but would also subject the arms to excessive wear,
requiring early replacement or repair of the arms.
Eventually, the leading and outer end portion of each hammer is
worn away. The shape of a worn "one-piece" hammer is indicated by
phantom line 26 for the hammer shown at the bottom of FIG. 1. The
hammer can then be turned so that its previously trailing edge
becomes its leading edge. The hammer is then operated until it has
a shape indicated by the combined phantom lines 26 and 27. Once the
hammer reaches this condition, it is relatively short and does not
track the "hammer circle." The hammer is then secured to the rotor
by suitable rod or pin (not shown) passing through a hole 30
located on the radial center line of the rotor arm. Since a
securing pin (not shown) passing through hole 30 would interfere
with the partial rotation of hammers still mounted to pivot about
holes 20, worn hammers are not moved to the outer holes 30 until an
entire set is available so that all hammers mounted on the common
ends on the arms in a set rotate about the same pivot axis. With
the hammers mounted on the center line holes, the leading edges of
the rotors are more exposed to impact with the material being
shredded, and are therefore each protected by a separate
replaceable U-shaped shoe 32, which slips over the leading and
outer edge of each rotor arm, which is cut away to the position
shown by dotted line 34 in FIG. 1. This dotted line is also the
bottom of the shoe, which extends outwardly to make the leading
portion of the arm substantially symmetrical with respect to the
trailing portion. The shoe includes a pair of inwardly extending
side walls 36 which make a close sliding fit against opposite faces
of the arm, and which have collinear holes 38 to receive the hammer
retaining pin 21. Thus, each shoe is held snugly in place to
protect the rotor and it can be removed when necessary and replaced
with a new shoe. Such a replacement is considerably faster and much
less expensive than the previous practice of building a worn rotor
arm back up by welding on hard facing material. The shoe protects
not only the leading edge of the rotor arm, but also the sides of
the arm, which are sometimes subjected to abrasion from small
pieces of hard material sifting in between the side of a hammer and
an adjacent face of the rotor arm.
When a hammer is to be replaced as described above, the retaining
pin 21 passing through the collinear holes in the set of arms to
which the hammer is secured must be withdrawn to the point where
the hammer is free to be removed. If the hammer is in the center of
the set of arms, it may be necessary to remove several of the
hammers to reach the one to be replaced. This is inconvenient and
requires a great deal of work because the hammers may weigh
anywhere from 200 to 400 lbs. each. This problem is avoided by the
preferred hammer design of this invention as shown by the hammers
on the right and left sides of FIG. 1. The preferred hammer
includes an inner or body portion 40 secured to the rotor arm by
the retaining pin 21 as previously described. The body is
approximately one-half the mass of a conventional one-piece hammer,
but includes a forwardly extending boss 42 formed integrally with
the central and lower portion of the body to extend into a matching
cavity 43 in a hammer head 44 secured to the front face of the
hammer body. The adjacent surfaces of the body and head match in
area and shape so the two pieces fit together to form what appears
to be an integral weight. The two pieces are held together by a pin
45 which extends through a pair of collinear holes 46 in the hammer
head, and a bore 47 in the tongue of the hammer body. The pin 45 is
substantially parallel to the axis of shaft rotation and is located
so that when the shaft is rotated and the hammers are held in their
operative positions, the pin 45 is prevented from moving
longitudinally by the adjacent rotor arms to which the hammer is
secured. After the head of the hammer is sufficiently worn to
require replacement, the machine is stopped, and the hammer is
rotated about its pivot in the direction of the shaft rotation to
the position shown in phantom line for the hammer on the left side
of FIG. 1 so that the pin 45 is no longer restrained from
longitudinal movement. The pin is then removed so the worn hammer
head can be replaced by a new one without having to disturb any of
the other hammers. This has the advantage of being faster and
easier because only the hammer being replaced need be handled, and
the replacement part is substantially lighter than the entire
hammer. Moreover, the discarded worn hammer head is substantially
smaller than the conventional discarded whole hammer, and thus
results in less waste.
* * * * *