U.S. patent number 3,842,421 [Application Number 05/332,666] was granted by the patent office on 1974-10-15 for multiple band frequency selective reflectors.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Philco-Ford Corporation. Invention is credited to Edward S. Jewell, James V. Rootsey.
United States Patent |
3,842,421 |
Rootsey , et al. |
October 15, 1974 |
MULTIPLE BAND FREQUENCY SELECTIVE REFLECTORS
Abstract
Polarization independent resonant elements are arrayed in a
common plane to form a frequency selective reflective surface for
electromagnetic energy. By employing an interspersed array of
multiple frequency elements, sufficiently decoupled to permit
independent operation, reflections in multiple bands are possible.
This makes it possible to operate the reflector at two widely
separated frequencies or, by critical separation in terms of
frequency, to operate the reflector as a broadband device.
Inventors: |
Rootsey; James V. (Sunnyvale,
CA), Jewell; Edward S. (Sunnyvale, CA) |
Assignee: |
Philco-Ford Corporation (Blue
Bell, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
23299279 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/332,666 |
Filed: |
February 15, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/909; 343/779;
343/837 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
5/45 (20150115); H01Q 19/193 (20130101); H01Q
15/0033 (20130101); H01Q 15/24 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
15/00 (20060101); H01Q 15/24 (20060101); H01Q
19/10 (20060101); H01Q 19/19 (20060101); H01Q
5/00 (20060101); H01q 019/14 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/756,909,779,837 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sanborn; Robert D. Woodward; Gail
W.
Claims
We claim:
1. In a resonant electromagnetic energy reflector structure having
a plurality of polarization insensitive resonant elements, said
elements being in a common plane and in sufficient number to render
said plane electrically active at the frequency of resonance of
said elements, the improvement comprising:
interspersing spaced polarization insensitive resonant elements of
a plurality of resonant frequencies, said elements being configured
and spatially rotated to minimize the electrical coupling between
elements of different resonant frequencies.
2. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said plurality of resonant
frequencies is two, and said resonant elements comprise crosses of
one size interspersed between crosses of a larger size, said
crosses of said one size being oriented at about 45.degree. with
respect to said crosses of said larger size.
3. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said plurality of resonant
frequencies is two, and said resonant elements comprise crosses
resonant at a first frequence interspersed with rings resonant at a
second frequency.
4. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said plurality of resonant
frequencies is three and said resonant elements comprise rings
resonant at a first frequency interspersed between crosses resonant
to a second frequency and an array of crosses resonant to a third
frequency located so that each ring encloses a cross, said crosses
inside said rings being oriented at about 45.degree. with respect
to said crosses resonant to said second frequency.
5. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said resonant elements
comprise conductive forms on an insulating substrate and said
elements produce frequency selective energy reflection.
6. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said resonant elements
comprise apertures in a conductive surface and said elements
produce frequency selective energy transmission.
7. A resonant electromagnetic energy reflector structure
comprising:
a first array of polarization insensitive elements dispersed
substantially uniformly over a common plane, said elements being
resonant at a first frequency, and
a second array of polarization insensitive elements spaced from
said first array and also dispersed substantially uniformly over
said plane, the elements in said second array being resonant at a
second frequency and interspersed uniformly among the elements of
said first array, said reflector structure being characterized in
that the elements of said second array are spatially rotated to be
sufficiently de-coupled electromagnetically from the elements of
said first array to permit operation of the reflector at discrete
frequencies represented by the resonant frequencies of the two
arrays.
8. A resonant electromagnetic energy reflector structure as claimed
in claim 7, wherein said two resonant frequencies are sufficiently
closely spaced as to produce a reflector having a broad frequency
response characteristic.
9. A resonant electromagnetic energy reflector structure as claimed
in claim 7, wherein said first and second arrays comprise crosses,
said second array crosses being smaller and oriented at about
45.degree. with respect to those of said first array.
10. A resonant electromagnetic energy reflector structure as
claimed in claim 7, wherein said first array comprises crosses and
said second array comprises rings.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Frequency selective reflectors have been used to advantage in the
prior art, particularly in the antenna art. In large parabolic
reflector type antennas it has been found expedient to operate the
antenna at more than one frequency. It is often not practical to
locate a plurality of different-frequency feed assemblies at the
reflector focus. One solution to the problem is to locate a
frequency selective plane reflector near the antenna focus so that
feeds can be mounted on both sides of the plane reflector, one at
the regular focus and one at the focus image formed by the plane
reflector.
In a typical antenna feed a low frequency feed array is located at
the reflector focus and aimed at the reflector. A resonant
reflector tuned to a substantially higher frequency and hence
transparent to the lower frequency is located between the feed and
the reflector. A second or high frequency feed operating at the
frequency of the resonant reflector is located between it and the
parabolic reflector and is aimed away from the parabolic reflector.
In effect, the focus of the parabolic reflector at the high
frequency is imaged at the location of the high frequency feed.
Thus both feeds are effectively located at the parabolic reflector
focus. The plane reflector must be essentially transparent at one
frequency and highly reflective at a second frequency. In the past
such reflectors have been achieved by polarization selection. That
is, a polarization selective reflector is used in conjunction with
polarized feeds. Such a system will not work with circularly
polarized signals or unpolarized signals.
It has been found that if conductive resonant elements (typically,
cross-shaped conductive elements), having no polarization
preference, are arranged on a dielectric surface, the array of
crosses will be reflective at the frequency of resonance and
transmissive at frequencies sufficiently removed from resonance.
Alternatively if a reflective surface is provided with an array of
apertures having a resonant character independent of polarization
it will be transmissive at the frequency of resonance and
reflective at frequencies sufficiently removed from resonance. The
degree of resonant transmission or reflection will be a function of
the density of resonant elements involved and can be made
substantial with reasonable structures.
Attempts to broadband such resonant reflectors or to operate them
at two frequencies have been largely unsuccessful. When similar
apertures of two different resonances are interspersed on a common
surface they tend to couple together to result in a single sharp
resonance.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the invention to provide an unpolarized resonant
reflector which is reflective at two different frequencies.
It is a further object to provide a broadband unpolarized resonant
reflector.
These and other objects are accomplished by interspersing on the
reflector different groups of unpolarized resonant elements, each
group having a different resonant frequency. These elements of
different resonant frequency must be sufficiently decoupled to
permit self resonance. If the reflective surface is to be composed
of cross-shaped elements, this can be achieved by interspersing
high and low frequency crosses oriented at about 45.degree. with
respect to each other. Alternatively the reflective surface can be
formed of an array of crosses interspersed with an array of rings
so as to minimize the coupling between arrays. In a third
embodiment, rings and interspersed crosses are combined with
smaller crosses inside the rings with the smaller crosses oriented
at about 45.degree. with respect to the larger crosses. This gives
a triple resonance effect.
FIG. 1 shows an antenna and feed structure in which the present
invention may be employed;
FIG. 2 is a front view of the structure of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged section of a plane reflector of a type known
in the prior art for use in the system of FIGS. 1 and 2;
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary view of the improved reflector structure
for two frequency operation;
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the transmission characteristics of a two
frequency device according to the invention;
FIG. 6 is a fragmentary view of the improved reflector structure
using interspersed rings and crosses; and
FIG. 7 is a fragmentary view of an improved reflector structure
designed for three frequency operation.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIGS. 1 and 2 show a known form of antenna system employing a
frequency selective reflecting surface. Parabolic reflector 1 is
provided with two radio frequency waveguide and horn feeds.
Waveguide 2 is terminated in a horn 3 which is located at the
reflector focus. Waveguide 4 is terminated by horn 5 and operates
at a substantially higher frequency. Frequency selective reflector
plate 6 is secured to horn 5 by means of low loss dielectric rods
7. Plate 6 is made to be highly reflective to the energy from horn
5 and highly transmissive to energy from horn 3. Thus the energy
from horn 5 is reflected from plate 6 to illuminate reflector 1
while the energy from horn 3 illuminates the same reflector
directly. The effect is as if both feed horns were located at the
reflector focus.
As shown in FIG. 3 plate 6 comprises a series of metal elements 8
mounted on a low loss dielectric substrate 9. These elements are
cruciform in shape and act like crossed dipole antennas. The
elements actively reflect electromagnetic energy for which they are
approximately one half wavelength. Such a structure will reflect
energy having any polarization. By employing a relatively large
number of such elements, plate 6 will be largely reflective at the
frequency of resonance and harmonics thereof. At other frequencies,
and particularly frequencies lower than the fundamental resonance,
the plate will be highly transmissive. The elements in plate 6 can
have other shapes. For example they may have narrower or wider
conductors, with the narrow conductors resulting in sharper
resonances thereby producing narrower operating bandwidth. Some
broadbanding of the elements can be achieved by using dumbbell
shapes or a version of the Maltese cross. Also ring shapes will
produce the desired unpolarized resonance where the periphery of
the ring establishes a fundamental resonance at one wavelength.
The frequency selective plate can be fabricated in several ways.
The simplest method useful for low power operation is to construct
plate 6 from metal coated low loss dielectric stock such as is used
in printed circuit fabrication. The desired metal pattern can be
produced by conventional photolithographic techniques wherein the
unwanted metal is chemically removed. For high power structures the
metal elements are constructed separately and secured by stand-off
insulators to a dielectric support plate.
While the above description is directed to a plate that is
reflective to resonant frequency energy, an alternative arrangement
employs a plate exhibiting resonant transmission. For such
structures the metal-dielectric patterns are reversed. For example
an array of cruciform holes (the shape of the dipoles in FIG. 3) is
cut into a dielectric mounted metal plate, using, for example, the
photolithographic process mentioned above. At the frequency for
which the holes are resonant, such a structure will be highly
transmissive. For nonresonant conditions it will be substantially
reflective. If such a plate were to be used in the FIG. 1 showing,
the resonant frequency of plate 6 would be at the frequency of the
energy in waveguide 2. Since the energy in waveguide 4 would not be
resonant, plate 6 in this alternative arrangement would be
reflective.
It has been found that such resonant plates are difficult to
operate over a substantial band of frequencies. As mentioned above,
if the resonant elements are made rather wide or are suitably
shaped, some broadbanding will occur but this effect is limited. If
crosses having a two-frequency distribution are interspersed they
ordinarily tend to couple together to produce a single response
having a resonance that is intermediate between the two
frequencies.
If the pattern of FIG. 4 is employed, two frequency operation of
the resonant reflector is feasible. A high frequency pattern is
arrayed inside the spaces between elements of a low frequency
pattern. The smaller crosses are rotated about 45.degree. to
minimize cross coupling. Such an array does in fact show two
resonances, one each for the two sizes of crosses.
FIG. 5 shows the reflection pattern for an array of elements shaped
like those in FIG. 4. The crosses represent conductive material on
a low loss dielectric substrate. When the two resonant frequencies
are sufficiently separated, two reflection peaks are seen as
indicated by the solid line a. Such a reflector is operable at two
discrete frequencies. If the two resonant frequencies are closely
spaced, the reflection curve of dashed line b in FIG. 5 occurs. The
resonance curves complement each other to produce a broad flat
reflection curve. It has been found that for single resonance peaks
such as shown in curve a the 97 percent reflection bandwidth is
ordinarily less than 10 percent. For the broadband version of curve
b, a 97 percent reflection bandwidth of 20 percent is achievable.
This broadbanding action is greatly desired in modern
communications systems and is the preferred mode of practicing our
invention.
FIG. 6 shows an alternative pattern of two-frequency resonant
elements that are sufficiently decoupled to permit discrete or
broadband operation. The rings are fundamentally resonant to the
frequency for which their periphery is approximately one wavelength
(two half wavelengths back to back).
FIG. 7 shows a three-frequency resonant structure that permits even
greater broadbanding and constitutes a combination of the
structures of FIGS. 4 and 6. The inner crosses represent the
highest frequency elements and the rings the lowest frequency
elements.
The foregoing description has shown the fundamental concepts and
applications associated with resonant surface reflection devices
and other equivalents and applications will occur to those skilled
in the art. Accordingly, it is intended that the scope of the
invention be limited only by the following claims:
* * * * *