U.S. patent number 3,835,469 [Application Number 05/303,174] was granted by the patent office on 1974-09-10 for optical limited scan antenna system.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Hughes Aircraft Company. Invention is credited to Chao C. Chen, Edward C. Du Fort.
United States Patent |
3,835,469 |
Chen , et al. |
September 10, 1974 |
OPTICAL LIMITED SCAN ANTENNA SYSTEM
Abstract
This invention relates to an optical antenna system including an
aperture lens, a feed lens and a feed array for scanning a pencil
beam or multiple simultaneous beams over a limited angular sector
with good sidelobe levels and minimum gain degradation. Both
amplitude and phase distributions over the aperture lens are
controlled for all scan angles. Also, the feed lens may be
positioned in a manner such that virtually the entire aperture lens
is illuminated for all scan angles thereby minimizing the size of
the aperture lens, energy spillover and rate of gain decrease with
angle from boresight.
Inventors: |
Chen; Chao C. (Cerritos,
CA), Du Fort; Edward C. (Fullerton, CA) |
Assignee: |
Hughes Aircraft Company (Culver
City, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
23170842 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/303,174 |
Filed: |
November 2, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/754;
343/911L; 342/376 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
15/02 (20130101); H01Q 3/2658 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
15/00 (20060101); H01Q 3/26 (20060101); H01Q
15/02 (20060101); H01q 003/26 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/753,754,755,854,911L,777 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Attorney, Agent or Firm: MacAllister; W. H. Himes; Robert
H.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An antenna system comprising first and second similar lenses
positioned back-to-back in confocal relationship relative to each
other, the diameter of said first lens being large compared to the
diameter of said second lens, and means for illuminating the side
of said second lens opposite the side thereof facing said first
lens with a plane wave at a predetermined angle in one direction
from the axis of rotation of said first and second lenses thereby
to transmit a plane wave in a direction opposite to said one
direction at an angle from said axis of rotation equal to the ratio
of the focal length of said second lens to the focal length of said
first lens times said predetermined angle.
2. The antenna system as defined in claim 1 wherein said first and
second lenses are of the flat constrained type with fixed foci.
3. The antenna system as defined in claim 1 wherein said first and
second lenses are of the doubly concave type with fixed foci.
4. The antenna system as defined in claim 1 wherein said first and
second lenses are concave on the sides facing each other and flat
on the remaining sides.
5. The antenna system as defined in claim 1 wherein said means for
illuminating the side of said second lens opposite the side thereof
facing said first lens with a plane wave includes an array of
radiating elements, a corporate feed having an output for each of
said radiating elements, a controllable phase shifter connected
between each output of said corporate feed and each respective
radiating element, and means connected to said controllable phase
shifters for controlling the phase shift imparted to electrical
energy flowing therethrough thereby to direct a plane wave at a
selected angle towards said second lens.
6. The antenna system as defined in claim 1 wherein said means for
illuminating the side of said second lens opposite the side thereof
facing said first lens with a plane wave constitutes a Luneberg
lens.
7. The antenna system as defined in claim 1 wherein said means for
illuminating the side of said second lens opposite the side thereof
facing said first lens with a plane wave constitutes a spherical
feedthrough lens.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
One contemporary system of providing limited scanning or
simultaneous beam clusters has been to employ a corporate fed array
with subarray phase shifters. The corporate feed in this system,
however, becomes large and complex and the number of phase shifters
increases in proportion to the aperture size. An alternative
technique is to employ a simple space fed array with element level
phase shifter. This system has a simple feed structure with a wide
field of view but requires a large number of phase shifters.
Still another technique is to employ a passive lens space fed by a
"Sheleg" type feed which moves the feed aperture distribution
intact by setting a uniform progressive phase in a number of phase
shifters. Since the feed aperture scans, the size of the feed and
the number of active elements increase as the scanning requirements
increase. The feed distribution, however, does not correct for lens
aberrations; therefore as the beam is scanned, the sidelobe level
is limited by the growth of coma phase error. Further, a
"Rudge-Witthers" technique for getting limited scan from a
parabolic reflector has been employed. This system requires the
feed to be physically moved to prevent spillover as the beam is
scanned. If the feed is not physically moved, the parabolic
reflector illumination will scan resulting in poor aperture
utilization. None of the foregoing systems can provide satisfactory
multiple simultaneous beams.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, an aperture lens that is
large in diameter compared with that of a feed lens is placed in
confocal relationship therewith. Both the aperture and feed lens
are entirely passive and are focused by means of fixed phase
shifters or line lengths in the elements. A small phased array or
other source is used to illuminate a portion of the feed lens with
a plane wave segment. This wave passes through the feed lens,
converges near the broadside focus at the focal plane, then spreads
out again and is intercepted by the aperture lens which refocuses
the energy to infinity. By changing the angle of the plane wave
emanating from the small feed antenna, the beam is scanned in the
far field. A significant reduction in total number of active
elements, phase shifters and related control components is obtained
over those used in the conventional phased array or subarray.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic diagram of the optical limited scan
antenna system of the present invention showing the relative
placement of the respective elements thereof;
FIGS. 2, 3 and 4 illustrate various species of aperture and feed
lenses for use in the antenna system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 illustrates the operation of the antenna system of FIG.
1;
FIG. 6 shows radiation patterns calculated for the antenna system
illustrated in FIG. 5; and
FIGS. 7 and 8 show alternative species of the feed array in the
antenna system of FIG. 1.
DESCRIPTION
Referring to FIG. 1 of the drawings, the optical limited scan
antenna system of the present invention includes an aperture lens
10 of focal length F, a feed lens 12 of focal length f, and a feed
antenna 14 fed by a corporate feed 15 through phase shifters 16
which are controlled by a phase shift controller 17. The aperture
lens 10 and feed lens 12 are confocal and are placed in
back-to-back relationship with each other. The aperture lens 10 is
large with a diameter D while the feed lens 12 is small by
comparison with a diameter d. Both lenses 10, 12 are entirely
passive and are focused by means of fixed phase shifters or line
lengths between corresponding elements on opposite sides thereof.
In order to maintain the feed lens 12 at a small size, the ratio
d/D of the diameters of the feed lens 12 and the aperture lens 10
must be small such as one half or less. That is,
d/D .ltoreq. 1/2 (1)
In addition, the feed lens 12 must be in the far field of the
common focal spot in order that geometrical optics may be used to
design the lenses. Since the focal spot is of the order of
.lambda.F/D in size where .lambda. is the wavelength, this requires
that the focal lengths be much longer than .lambda. which is an
insignificant restriction.
The optical limited scan antenna system of the invention operates
as follows. The small feed antenna 14, such as the phased array
shown in FIG. 1, is fed by means of the corporate feed 15 and phase
shifters 16 controlled by a phase shift controller 17 in a manner
to illuminate a section of the feed lens 12 with a plane wave
segment. The feed array 14 is placed a distance h from the feed
lens 12 and the angle of incidence of the plane wave thereon
determined by phase shift controller 17 is designated .phi.. This
plane wave passes through the feed lens 12 and converges near the
broadside focus 18 at the focal plane, then spreads out again and
is intercepted by the aperture lens 10 which refocuses the energy
to infinity. The angle from normal at which the wave leaves the
aperture lens is designated .theta.. By changing the angle .phi. of
the plane wave emanating from the small feed antenna 14, by means
of the phase shift controller 17, the beam emanating from the
aperture lens 10 is scanned in the far field.
The number of active elements required for scanning in a certain
angular sector is proportional to (f.sup.2/ F.sup.2) D.sup.2 as
opposed to the conventional phased array or subarray wherein the
number of active elements is proportional to D.sup.2. Thus, a
significant reduction in total number of active elements, phase
shifters and concomitant control components is obtained.
To maintain a high utilization of the large aperture lens 10, it is
necessary to place the feed antenna 14 at the proper location -- to
ensure that energy leaving the feed antenna 14 will be intercepted
by the aperture lens 10 without spillover or under illumination for
all scan angles. The proper location for the feed antenna 14 can be
estimated by considering only a central ray on receive. For the
angle of arrival .theta. as shown in FIG. 1, the ray intercepts the
focal plane very close to the peak of the focal spot at a distance
s = F.theta. from the axis, i.e., from the broadside focal point
18. Since parallel incident rays cross at the focal spot which is
common to both the aperture lens 10 and feed lens 12, the rays will
exit the feed lens 12 at the angle .phi. corresponding to the
common focal spot displacement s whereby:
s = F.theta. (2)
s = f.phi. (3)
whereby
.phi. = F/f .theta. (4)
In addition, the distance X from the axis to the point 20 at which
the central received ray intercepts the feed lens 12 is:
X = (F + f) .theta. (5)
This ray will cross the optical axis at the distance h from the
feed lens 14 where h is related to X and .phi. as follows:
X = h.phi. (6)
Combining equations (4), (5) and (6) to eliminate X and .phi.
produces the result that:
h = f(1 + f/F) (7)
provided that the scan angle .theta. is not large. This condition
where .theta. in radians .apprxeq. sin .theta. is satisfied for
limited scan. Since the central ray enters and leaves the system at
points which are independent of scan angle, .theta. to a good
approximation, the aperture lens 10 and feed array 14 are
illuminated over fixed areas thereby achieving higher aperture
utilization and low spillover.
The common focus and the similarity of the aperature and feed
lenses 10, 12 ensures that a plane wave segment incident on either
lens 10, 12 will produce a plane wave segment on the remaining lens
with very little phase error despite phase errors introduced by
either lens 10 or 12 alone. Similarity is designated as meaning
that the feed lens 12 is a scaled replica of the aperture lens 10,
the scale factor being the ratio of the focal lengths, f/F . Thus,
the lenses 10, 12 are similar in shape and if focused with line
lengths, these lengths at corresponding positions also have the
ratio f/F . Examples of similar lenses are shown in FIGS. 2-4.
Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown a flat constrained aperture
lens 30 of focal length F with flat similar feed lens 32 with focal
length f. Lens 30 has arrays of elements 33, 34 on opposite sides
thereof and lens 32 has arrays of elements 35, 36 on opposite sides
thereof. Corresponding elements of arrays 33, 34 and arrays 35, 36
may be connected together by line cable or fixed phase shifters
with the length or phase shift at corresponding positions having
the ratio f/F . Referring to FIG. 3 there is shown a doubly concave
or parabolic aperture and feed lens 40, 42, respectively. In this
case, the respective arrays on opposite sides of the lenses 40, 42
curve whereby all phase shifts or line lengths between
corresponding elements remain constant. Referring to FIG. 4, there
is illustrated the embodiment where aperture lens 44 and feed lens
46 are flat on the outside and concave on the confocal side. It is
also possible to utilize unconstrained dielectric lenses or other
lens designs provided that they preserve similarity as defined
above.
Satisfactory operation of the scanning system of the present
invention has been obtained for the embodiment shown in FIG. 5. Two
doubly parabolic feedthrough aperture and feed lenses 50, 52 each
having arrays with corresponding elements connected by equal line
lengths are disposed confocally and fed by a planar phased array 54
arranged to reduce illumination scanning in the aperture lens 50.
Aperture lens 50 has a diameter, D, of 80 wavelengths and an F/D =
0.563. Feed lens 52, on the other hand, has a diameter, d of 40
wavelengths and an f/d = 0.300. Calculated patterns are shown in
FIG. 6. With a 0.8.degree. 3 db beamwidth and sidelobes below 25 db
at broadside, it can be shown that the beam may be scanned 10
beamwidths with sidelobes below 20 db with good efficiency. The
feed array 54 has 800 active elements and 20 wavelength diameter
while a conventional corporate or spaced fed array requires
approximately 4,000 active elements and phase shifters to achieve
the same performance.
The embodiments of the optical limited scan antenna system of the
present invention may be used with different feed antennas.
Referring to FIG. 7, there is shown a Luneberg lens 60 for
illuminating the feed lens 12. In this case the center of the
Luneberg lens 60 is positioned a distance h from the feed lens 12.
A feed horn 61 for a broadside beam is positioned at the diameter
of the Luneberg lens 60 normal to the feed lens 12 on the side
thereof opposite from lens 12. Other beams can be generated by
using additional feed horns 62 rotated from the feed horn 61.
Referring to FIG. 8, there is shown a spherical feedthrough lens 70
for illuminating the feed lens 12. In this case the center of the
output sphere of lens 70 is positioned a distance h from the feed
lens 12. A feed horn 71 for a broadside beam is disposed within the
input hemisphere along a line connecting the respective centers of
the hemispheres of lens 70. A deviation from this line by a feed
horn 72, for example, scans the beam. The beam can be mechanically
scanned by physically moving a feed horn 71 or 72 or multiple
simultaneous beams can be provided by employing additional feed
horns.
* * * * *