U.S. patent number 3,833,460 [Application Number 05/292,662] was granted by the patent office on 1974-09-03 for dry method for separating paper constitutents for recovery and recycling.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Arthur D. Little, Inc.. Invention is credited to Fred D. Iannazzi, John W. Rafferty, Donald B. Sparrow, Richard Strauss.
United States Patent |
3,833,460 |
Iannazzi , et al. |
September 3, 1974 |
DRY METHOD FOR SEPARATING PAPER CONSTITUTENTS FOR RECOVERY AND
RECYCLING
Abstract
A method for separating mixtures of waste paper into two
components using the differences in strength and/or
water-receptivity characteristics of the two components which are
typically the liner board and corrugated medium of corrugated paper
or a mixture of magazines and newsprint. In separation, the
material of the paper mixture is cut into pieces ranging in size
from about one to six inches in either dimension, treated with a
debonding agent and then subjected to differential size reduction
wherein one of the mixture components is reduced to small pieces,
e.g., one-quarter inch in either dimension, while the other remains
in pieces of essentially the same size. Separation of the two
distinctly different sized components is then effected.
Inventors: |
Iannazzi; Fred D. (Andover,
MA), Rafferty; John W. (Topsfield, MA), Sparrow; Donald
B. (Lexington, MA), Strauss; Richard (Lexington,
MA) |
Assignee: |
Arthur D. Little, Inc.
(Cambridge, MA)
|
Family
ID: |
23125643 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/292,662 |
Filed: |
September 27, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
162/5;
162/158 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D21B
1/02 (20130101); D21B 1/32 (20130101); Y02W
30/646 (20150501); Y02W 30/64 (20150501) |
Current International
Class: |
D21B
1/32 (20060101); D21B 1/02 (20060101); D21B
1/00 (20060101); D21c 005/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;162/4,5,158,8 ;241/28
;209/3,4,9,133,268 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Other References
Kinne, M. R., "A System for Reclaiming Vinyl Coated Fiber," Tappi,
Vol. 39, No. 8, August 1956, pp. 168A-169A. .
Casey, "Pulp & Paper," Vol. 1, p. 373, 1960, Interscience, New
York..
|
Primary Examiner: Bashore; S. Leon
Assistant Examiner: Smith; William F.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lepper; Bessie A.
Claims
We claim:
1. An essentially dry method of separating for recovering and
recycling two paper constituents which differ in water receptivity,
comprising the steps of
a. reducing the paper material to be separated to pieces having
maximum dimensions no greater than six inches;
b. uniformly distributing an effective amount of a debonding liquid
over the pieces formed to selectively debond the fibers in the more
water receptive component, said amount being no greater than about
50 % by paper weight;
c. subjecting the pieces from step (b) without any additional
liquid to differential size reduction whereby the pieces of the
more water-receptive constituent are reduced to fibers and small
pieces no greater than about 1/4 inch in dimension while the major
portion of the less water-receptive constituent remains essentially
intact; and
d. separating out said fibers and small pieces as essentially dry
material from said less water-receptive constituent which is also
in an essentially dry condition.
2. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the amount of
debonding liquid is equivalent to between about 20 and 50 % by
weight of said paper material.
3. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said debonding
liquid is water.
4. A method in accordance with claiam 1 wherein said debonding
agent comprises an aqueous solution of an active debonding material
which is urea, ethylene carbonate, or mixtures thereof, the
concentration of said active debonding material ranging between
about 2 and 10 % by weight of the water used in forming said
aqueous solution.
5. A method in accordance with claim 4 wherein said active
debonding material is a mixture of urea and ethylene carbonate in a
weight ratio ranging from about 1 to 3 to about 3 to 1 and said
debonding liquid contains a surfactant in an amount equivalent to
form about 0.1 to 1 % by total weight of said urea and ethylene
carbonate.
6. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said two paper
constituents are the linerboard and the corrugated medium of
corrugated board.
7. A method in accordance with claim 6 wherein said differential
size reduction is carried out until at least from about 70 to about
90 weight percent of said corrugated medium is reduced to said
small pieces.
8. A method in accordance with claim 6 including the step of
partially delaminating the corrugated board subsequent to step (a)
thereby to expose said corrugated medium.
9. A method in accordance with claim 8 wherein said corrugated
board is subject to physical treatment prior to said step of
partially delaminating thereby to enhance the action of said
debonding agent.
10. A method in accordance with claim 9 wherein said physical
treatment comprises dry heating.
11. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said two paper
constituents are newspapers and sized magazine paper.
12. A method in accordance with claim 11 including the step of
adding to pieces formed in step (a) an agent capable of
gelatinizing the sizing on said magazine paper thereby to render it
even less water receptive.
13. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein at least a portion
of said less water-receptive constituent comprises contaminants
such as asphalt-gummed tape, plastic films and the like.
14. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein no longer than 10
minutes elapses between the performance of step (b) and step
(c).
15. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said step of
subjecting said pieces to differential size reduction is carried
out in a low-energy level input mill.
16. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said step of
separating out said fibers and said small peices comprises carrying
off said fibers and small pieces in a dry air stream.
Description
This invention relates to an essentially dry method for separating
two paper constituents and more particularly for separating an
essentially unsized, highly water-receptive paper constituent from
a sized, less water-receptive paper constituent. The method may
also be used to separate and remove fibrous or film contaminants
such as asphalt-impregnated tape, plastic films and the like. In
the following description and claims the term "essentially dry" is
used to designate paper stock having up to 35 to 40 % moisture by
weight.
In the recovery of paper for recyling from a composite paper
product such as corrugated board or from a physical mixture such as
a combination of newspapers and magazines, there arises the problem
of separating two kinds of paper having different properties and
physical characteristics. At least a partial separation is
essential to allow each type of paper to be reused in the most
efficient and economical manner.
Although, as will be evident, the method of this invention is not
limited to the processing of corrugated board, the problems which
are faced in the industry may be illustrated with reference to the
handling of this well-known paper composite product. Corrugated
board is formed as a corrugated medium between and adhered to two
outside layers of linerboard. The corrugated medium and linerboard
serve two distinct and different roles and are therefore formed of
two distinct and different types of paper. The corrugated medium
must be highly crush-resistant and have a high degree of stiffness.
It is formed of so-called "semichemical" hardwood fibers which
generally make up at least 80 to 85 percent of the corrugated
medium. The corrugated medium paper is as a result of its
composition and purpose an unsized, highly water-receptive
material. In addition, this material has comparatively low-strength
characteristics when compared with linerboard.
In contrast to the corrugated medium, the linerboard is formed of
unbleached, softwood kraft pulp. The fibers are relatively long,
the linerboard is sized, exhibits a relatively low degree of water
receptivity and high puncture resistance. It will be seen that if
these paper constituents of corrugated board are recovered as a
single, mixed material, the recovered fibers are not ideally
suitable for serving as either corrugated medium or as linerboard
since each must possess distinct and different characteristics.
Typically, a corrugated board will comprise some 84 pounds of
linerboard per one thousand square feet, 36 to 38 pounds of
corrugated medium and some 6 pounds of starch used primarily as an
adhesive.
At present there is no known commercially available, practical
process for separating the liner from the medium component in the
recycle of old corrugated contains. An experimental method now
under evaluation for separating these two paper constituents in
corrugated board involves a wet process in which some 5 % by weight
of hammermilled corrugated board is thoroughly mixed into about 95
% by weight of water and beaten under high energy conditions to
form an all-fiber slurry. Subsequent to this, the two types of
fibers are separated by centrifuging the fiber slurry. It will be
apparent that this requires in addition to handling a large
quantity of water (which may be recycled) the processing of wet
fibers to separate the two different fiber types.
As another example for the need for an efficient and economical
method for separating paper constituents, the recovery of newsprint
may be cited. Newsprint itself is generally free from any sizing
and is highly water receptive. However, in the collection of old
newspaper, a number of magazines get mixed in and these are
generally formed of papers which are highly sized and coated, and
which have relatively low water receptivity. In order to reuse the
newsprint in the usual well-known manner to make recycled newsprint
and the like it is necessary to remove a substantial portion of the
paper which is not newsprint. Hand sorting of the material prior to
the newsprint recovery process is not economical and a wet process
of separation is not currently available.
It will be seen from these two illustrative situations that it
would be desirable to have a method for separating two different
paper constituents which are to be reused, each for a different
purpose.
It is therefore a primary object of this invention to provide an
improved method for separating and recovering two different paper
constituents so that each constituent may best be used for the
purpose for which it is recovered. It is another object to provide
a method of the character described which is an essentially dry
process and which does not require the separation of two types of
fibers from large masses of wet fibers. It is yet another object of
this invention to provide a method for the recovery of the two
types of paper making up corrugated board in forms such that each
type may be reprocessed and used in the same role in reconstituted
corrugated board formation as originally used. This invention has
as an additional object the providing of chemical additives that
will facilitate the differential size reduction of the component
parts by weakening one component and/or strengthening the other
component. Still an additional object is to provide a method of the
character described which enables magazine paper to be effectively
separated from newsprint in the recycling of papers. Other objects
of the invention will in part be obvious and will in part be
apparent hereinafter.
By the method of this invention the corrugated board or mixture of
newspapers and magazines is first reduced to small pieces, i.e.,
one to several square inches in area, and then chemical additives
including a debonding liquid which may contain urea, ethylene
carbonate, wetting agents, etc., uniformly distributed over the
paper pieces. The quantity of debonding liquid is maintained at a
level which is no greater than 50 % by weight of the paper treated.
Immediately or shortly after the application of debonding agent the
paper is subjected to a differential size reduction treatment so
that a substantial proportion of the unsized, water-receptive
constituent is reduced to fine pieces of the order of 1/4 inch on a
side while the paper constituent which is sized and which is not
readily receptive to water remains essentially in its original
size, e.g., one to several square inches in area. The fractions are
then separated out, preferably in a suitable air separator, in an
essentially dry condition. In the case of corrugated board, partial
delamination to break a portion of the adhesive bond between the
linerboard and the corrugated medium is desirable, and some
physical treatment such as dry heating may be used to enhance the
debonding process.
The invention accordingly comprises the several steps and the
relation of one or more of such steps with respect to each of the
others, and the composition possessing the features, properties and
relation of constituents, which are exemplified in the following
detailed disclosure, and the scope of the invention will be
indicated in the claims.
The method of this invention may now be described in further
detail. The paper feed, e.g., corrugated board is first reduced to
small pieces several inches (i.e., 1 to 6 inches) in either
dimension. This may conveniently be done in a shredder or in a
hammermill or by a rotary cutter. If the paper is corrugated board
it may in some instances be desirable to subject these pieces to
some physical treatment, such as dry heat, which will help to break
the adhesive bonds between the linerboard and the corrugated
medium. such heating should, of course, not be performed at a
temperature or for a time which would cause any appreciable thermal
degradation of any of the fibers making up the paper feed. This
step of physical treatment is an optional one.
Where the paper feed is corrugated board, the next step is the
partial delamination of the pieces to expose at least a portion of
the corrugated medium (unsized, highly water receptive component).
It is not necessary to remove all of the linerboard from the
corrugated medium and normally about 70 % delamination is
sufficient. Since the linerboard is normally adhered to the
corrugated medium by means of some suitable adhesive, e.g., starch,
some physical treatment, such as the optional dry heating step
mentioned, may be used to break the adhesive bonds before
delamination. If the paper feed being processed is a mixture of
newspaper and magazines, then the delamination step, along with the
optional step of physical treatment, is eliminated.
The purpose of the debonding liquid is to act on the unsized,
water-receptive constituent, e.g., the corrugated medium of
corrugated board or the newsprint in a mixture with magazine paper.
The debonding liquid is applied as a solution in which the
concentration of the active debonding agent ranges between about 2
and about 10 % by weight. Normally the solvent will be water; but
such nonpolar water-miscible liquids as alcohols and the like may
also be used. Since the debonding agent is to act selectively on
the unsized, water-receptive paper constituent and since the
resulting separated materials are to be discharged in an
essentially dry state it is necessary that the amount of debonding
agent which is uniformly distributed over the milled or shredded
material be controlled. Therefore, the amount of debonding liquid
applied to the paper feed should range between about 20 and about
50 % by weight of the paper feed. Moreover, the quantity of
debonding liquid used and the concentration of the debonding agent
in the debonding liquid should be adjusted so that from about 1 to
about 3 % by weight of debonding agent based on paper feed weight
is applied.
The liquid component of the debonding liquid serves as a lubricant
as well as a deterent to the build-up of static electricity in the
subsequent step of fiberizing in which at least a major portion,
i.e., more than 60 percent of the unsized, waterreceptive
constituent is reduced to fibers. The debonding agent comprises one
or more components which are capable of destroying or materially
reducing the hydrogen bonds in the paper constituent to be reduced
to fibers. Exemplary of suitable debonding agents are urea,
ethylene carbonates and surfactants (anionic or nonionic) or
mixtures of these materials. In a typical mixture the ratio of urea
to ethylene carbonate may range from about 1 to 3 to about 3 to 1,
and the surfactant may be present in an amount ranging from about
0.1 to 1 % by total weight of the urea and ethylene carbonate. This
debonding agent is conveniently dissolved in water to form the
debonding liquid.
The debonding liquid may be applied to the paper feed in any manner
suitable for attaining substantially uniform distribution of the
liquid over the surfaces of the paper pieces. The spraying of the
debonding liquid in the form of a fine mist into a stream of the
milled paper pieces as they are discharged from the hammermill or
shredder into the differential size reduction equipment is
exemplary of one way in which such uniform application may be
achieved.
Once the debonding liquid is applied to the milled paper pieces,
the next step of differential size reduction follows within a short
time, and preferably it follows immediately. Thus the selective
size reduction should be begun not later than about 10 minutes
after application of the debonding liquid.
In another embodiment of the method of this invention, an
additional chemical agent may be added to the paper pieces which
will preferentially strengthen the less water-receptive constituent
of the mixture. As an example, a 2 % boric acid solution may be
sprayed onto the paper pieces to gelantize the starch coating which
is present on the magazine component pieces of No. 1 waste news.
The application of an effective amount of this additive serves to
increase the strength of the starch coated paper thereby making it
less susceptible to the subsequent differential sizing
treatment.
The controlled and selective mechanical size reduction of a waste
paper mixture or composite material is preferably carried out in a
low-energy input mill apparatus such as a Micro Bud (Trademark)
mill or apparatus similar in construction and operation to a Waring
blender. The purpose of this step of differential size reduction is
to reduce a large portion of the unsized, more water-receptive
constituent into small pieces (e.g., 1/4 inch or less) while
retaining the sized, less water-receptive constituent in
essentially its originally cut size. Thus in the case of the
recovery of corrugated board, the corrugated medium being unsized
and having readily absorbed the debonding liquid is reduced to
small pieces while the linerboard remains substantially intact. In
simiar fashion, the difference in water receptivity and size
content between newsprint and magazines is taken advantage of to
reduce a substantial portion of the newsprint to very small pieces.
A minor portion of the linerboard fraction, say between about 10
and 30 % of its original weight, may be reduced to small pieces and
may be removed with the corrugated medium fraction. However, this
quantity of soft wood kraft material may be mixed with the
semi-chemical hardwood of the corrugated medium for reprocessing to
form so-called "bogus medium" or it may be added to virgin
semichemical pulp to make corrugated medium.
In applying the method of this invention to separating newsprint
and magazines up to about 20 % of the newsprint may be removed with
the magazine fraction and still provide an economical recovery
system. It is, of course, preferable in all cases to carry out as
complete a separation of the constituents as is possible.
Subsequent to the step of differential size reduction, which may be
a continuous or a batch operation, the resulting mixture of small
pieces of paper and those pieces which have not been appreciably
reduced in size is subjected to particle classification and
separation. This is conveniently done by passing the mixture
through an air separator such as a so-called Segradyne separator
wherein the small lighter peices are borne out on an air stream as
one fraction and the remaining larger pieces are removed as a
second fraction. Both fractions after separation are essentially
dry because of the relatively small quantity of debonding liquid
used. the ability to achieve effective separation with a limited
amount of debonding liquid is, in turn, attributable to the
combination of steps used which take advantage of the difference in
the physical and chemical characteristics of the paper constituents
being separated and recovered.
In a similar manner, paper components containing fibrous or plastic
film contaminants such as asphalt-laminated gummed tape and
polyethylene film can be removed from the recycled product by the
method of this invention. The stronger asphalt tape and plastic
film containing pieces will remain essentially the same size as the
magazine component of a magazine-newsprint mixture feed when
subjected to the differential size reduction step. Therefore, it is
possible to separate papers containing such contaminants along with
the magazine fraction.
The method of this invention may be further described with
reference to the following example which is meant to be
illustrative and not limiting.
Samples of old corrugated boxes were cut into 1 1 inch .times. 1
inch squares with a paper cutter. The squares of corrugated board
were placed in a Waring blender (dry) to delaminate the linerboard
and medium fractions. A 10 % by weight solution of urea in water
containing 0.2 % by water weight of a nonionic surfactant was made
up as a debonding liquid. An amount equivalent to 40 % by paper
stock weight of this debonding liquid was applied to the
delaminated pieces of corrugated board. This quantity of debonding
liquid provided a urea pick-up of about 21/2 %.
The pieces of board moistened with the debonding liquid were then
subjected to the action of the Waring blender for about 5-10
seconds. As a result of this mechanical differential size reduction
the corrugated medium was reduced to small (1/4 inch or smaller)
pieces while the linerboard fraction remained essentially
intact.
This differentially sized material was then placed in an air
separator to segregate the pieces of linerboard from the smaller
pieces of corrugated medium. In the air separator, the corrugated
medium fraction was collected as the "accepts," i.e., the lighter
fraction, and the linerboard fraction was collected as the
"rejects," i.e., the heavier fraction.
Physical strength measurements were made on handsheets of paper
formed from these two fractions. In forming these hand sheets the
two recovered fractions were disintegrated and dispersed in
accordance with TAPPI standard procedure No. 410 for forming
papermaking furnishes. The hand sheets were made on a Noble-Wood
laboratory apparatus from these furnishes and the physical data,
given in Table 1, were obtained by standard procedures.
Table 1
__________________________________________________________________________
Physical Properties of Hand Sheets
__________________________________________________________________________
Freeness Basis Wt. Canadian Burst Tensile Tear Sample
Identification gm/m.sup.2 Std-ml psi Kg/15mm gm
__________________________________________________________________________
Control--Aggregate 2.76 670 10.0 1.27 69.7 Material Linerboard
Fraction 2.71 655 10.0 1.53 71.2 Corrugated Medium 2.71 690 6.2
1.03 45.2 Fraction
__________________________________________________________________________
From the data given in Table 1, which also includes the physical
data on a handsheet formed of a fiber mixture recovered from
corrugated board, it will be seen that an effective separation was
made between the two kinds of fibers used in forming the corrugated
board. This is particularly evident from the tensile and tear
strength data.
In a similar manner, magazine cover stock was mixed with newsprint
and torn into 1 inch .times. 1 inch pieces. The previously
described solution of debonding agent was sprayed onto the pieces
to produce about a 40 % moisture pick-up (2.5 % urea pick-up by
weight of paper). The treated pieces were then subjected to the
shearing action of the Waring Blender for about 5 seconds. As in
the case of the corrugated board, the difference in the physical
characteristics of the two constituents made it possible to retain
most of the stronger, more water-resistant component (magazine
fraction) essentially intact while reducing the size of the more
water-receptive and weaker component (newsprint fraction) to form
small pieces. The two fractions were separated one from the other
by the air separation technique previously described.
The method of this invention provides an essentially dry process
for separating paper constituents which is based upon differences
in water receptivity and physical strength. The elimination of the
need to form a paper slurry elimates the need to handle wet pulp
and to recycle large quantities of water.
It will thus be seen that the objects set forth above, among those
made apparent from the preceding description are efficiently
attained and, since certain changes may be made in carrying out the
above method without departing from the scope of the invention, it
is intended that all matter contained in the above description
shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting
sense.
* * * * *