U.S. patent number 3,830,178 [Application Number 05/354,555] was granted by the patent office on 1974-08-20 for semisubmerged ship with hull extensions.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy. Invention is credited to Thomas G. Lang.
United States Patent |
3,830,178 |
Lang |
August 20, 1974 |
SEMISUBMERGED SHIP WITH HULL EXTENSIONS
Abstract
An improvement for the semisubmerged ship provides hull
extensions for adional buoyancy or increased cargo and fuel storage
which do not appreciably create more drag. In one configuration
sacks disposed below the level of surface wave action are inflated
to permit shallow water operation. Preferably, however, the hull
extensions have a meniscoidal cross-sectional configuration and are
mounted on the submerged hulls. Particularly in the case of the
meniscoidal-shaped extensions, the structural integrity of the
semisubmerged ship is not compromised and the ship's capability for
high-speed operation remains substantially unimpaired since the
hull extensions do not appreciably create excessive drag. Whatever
configuration is chosen, the hull extensions are either permanently
or releasably coupled to the hulls to allow flexibility in range
and payload.
Inventors: |
Lang; Thomas G. (San Diego,
CA) |
Assignee: |
The United States of America as
represented by the Secretary of the Navy (Washington,
DC)
|
Family
ID: |
23393873 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/354,555 |
Filed: |
April 26, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
114/61.14;
114/265; 114/49 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B63B
1/107 (20130101); B63B 2001/128 (20130101); B63B
2043/145 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B63B
43/00 (20060101); B63B 43/14 (20060101); B63B
1/00 (20060101); B63B 1/10 (20060101); B63b
001/32 () |
Field of
Search: |
;114/49,52,53,54,61,123,16E,.5F,.5R ;9/1R,6 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Halvosa; George E. A.
Assistant Examiner: Kazenske; Edward R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sciascia; Richard S. Johnston;
Ervin F. Keough; Thomas G.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. In a semisubmerged ship having at least one hull disposed
beneath the water's surface, a platform carried above the water's
surface, and at least one water-surface piercing strut member,
interconnecting the hull and platform, an improvement therefor is
provided comprising:
a pair of means for increasing the volume displaced by said
semisubmerged ship each disposed on opposite sides of said hull and
having a rigid meniscoidal cross-sectional configuration with its
inner contour shaped to accommodate said hull and its outer contour
shaped to reduce the problems associated with drag, a first one of
the increasing means has at least one compartment for buoyancy and
storage and a second one of the increasing means is filled with a
rigid buoying material for buoyancy and protection of the hull and
both of the increasing means cooperate to give the composite
structure created thereby an elliptical cross-sectional appearance,
and;
means for removeably mounting both increasing means beneath the
water's surface on said hull to give said semisubmerged ship a
variable displacement.
2. An improvement according to claim 1 in which at least one of the
increasing means extends nearly the full length of said hull for
providing increased buoyancy and protection thereto.
3. An improvement according to claim 1 in which at least one of the
increasing means extends only a fraction of the length of said
hull.
Description
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or
for the Government of the United States of America for governmental
purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or
therefor.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The semisubmerged ship for which this invention is an unobvious
improvement, is thoroughly described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,623,444.
Briefly, the semisubmerged ship places one or two hulls well below
the area of surface wave action and supports a platform above the
water by at least one water surface piercing strut member.
Horizonally oriented stabilizers, vanes and canard fins are mounted
on the hulls to ensure high-speed dynamic pitch, roll, and heave
stability. However, one limitation of the semisubmerged ship became
apparent in that the maximum buoying force was a fixed function
governed by the dimensions of its submerged hulls. Thus, its
maximum range was limited by the amount of fuel that could be
carried and its maximum payload was similarly restricted. One
obvious solution would be to build a semisubmerged ship with larger
hulls. On short-range routine operations the larger hulled ship
would be inefficient when compared to a ship having smaller hulls
specifically designed for short-range or reduced-payload
applications. Therefore, in semisubmerged ship design a need for an
increased buoyancy and payload while not apprciably increasing the
drag continues to exist. Structure and devices to increase the
buoyancy of a surface craft or to reduce its drag are many and
varied in design. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 6469 issued to
Abraham Lincoln in 1849 directly addressed itself to reduce the
draft of steamboats. Expandable chambers were connected to the
sides of the steamboat to buoy it over shoals. The expandable
chambers were placed in the area of surface wave action to greatly
increase the ship's drag and hence render such a modification
unsuitable for the high speed semisubmerged ship. While this
approach may represent a noteworthy modification for surface ships,
taken in light of the state of technology at the time, history has
proven that the inventor could and did better devote his talents to
other fields of endeavor. Two other more recent attempts to reduce
a ship's draft are shown in two U.S. Patents to Livas. These U.S.
Pats., No. 3,171,377 and 3,198,157 show the use of an inflatable
flexible membrane or the attachment of buoyant chambers to the side
of the hull. Either approach mounts the buoyancy elements in the
area of surface wave action and turbulance and seriously effects
the ship's manueverability and drag. Others have tried securing
pontoons onto the sides of a ship's hull to reduce draft. Here
again, the buoying members are located on the surface of the water
and by being so located impose intolerable speed and
manueverability limitations.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to providing an improvement for a
semisubmerged ship having at least one hull disposed beneath the
water's surface, a platform carried above the water's surface, and
at least one water-surface piercing strut member interconnecting
the hull and platform. A means for increasing the volume displaced
by the semisubmerged ship is located well beneath the area of
surface wave action and is secured in place by a mounting means
which ensures increased displacement while not introducing
excessive drag.
It is a prime object of the invention to provide an improvement for
the semisubmerged ship.
Another object is to provide for increasing the payload and range
of the semisubmerged ship.
Still another object is to provide for hull extensions carried
below the area of surface wave action to ensure greater
payload.
Still another object is to provide hull extensions configured for
increasing the semisubmerged ship's buoyancy while not overly
compromising drag.
Still another object is to provide an improvement for the
semisubmerged ship giving the ship a reduced draft.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide for hull
extensions which simultaneously provide increased buoyancy,
increased range, and increased protection for the semisubmerged
ship.
These and other objects of the invention will become more readily
apparent from the ensuing specification when taken with the
drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1 and 2 are isometric depictions of two typical examples of
the semisubmerged ship showing the hull extensions in place.
FIGS. 3a and 3b schematically in cross-section show one embodiment
of the invention taken generally along lines a-a in FIGS. 1 and
2.
FIGS. 4a and 4b schematically in cross-section show another
embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 5 shows still another embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 6 shows yet another embodiment of the invention.
FIGS. 7, 8, 9, and 10 show the preferred configuration of the
invention.
FIG. 11 shows typical mounting positions of the hull
extensions.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2 of the drawings, the semisubmerged
ship is depicted in two typical embodiments each having one or more
hulls 10 disposed one or more hull diameters below the surface of
the body of water. At least one water-surface piercing strut 11
extends upward from a hull to support a platform 12 above the
water's surface and, in the embodiment of FIG. 2, a pair of
water-surface piercing strut members 13 depend from opposite
lateral extremes of the platform into the water.
Horizontally oriented stabilizers 14 having a rectangular
configuration in FIG. 1, or a delta configuration in FIG. 2, and
canard fins 15 are mounted on the hulls a distance below the area
of surface wave turbulance. The struts, horizontally oriented
stabilizers, and canard fins hydrodynamically cooperate as the
semisubmerged ship makes a high speed run to ensure the vessel's
stability in dynamic pitch, roll and heave. These two
representative examples possess superior dynamic and static
stability. Suitable control and drive mechanisms suitably
articulate the canard fins and stabilizers and additional flaps,
vents etc. optionally are included to ensure such stability.
Inclusion of the hull extensions 20 has resulted in these designs
having a significantly increased payload and range without adding
excessive drag or impairing the vessel's manueverability.
Increased buoyancy is provided for by the hull extensions which may
be one of a variety of configurations. Irrespective of which
configuration is chosen, it is important to place the extensions
well below the water's surface. Laboratory tests have indicated
that such placement reduces the problems associated with surface
wave action e.g., excessive drag and imparied maneuverability.
One embodiment of the hull extensions is shown in FIGS. 3a and 3b.
An inflatable sack 21 is carried on a submerged hull while another
inflatable sack 22 is mounted on a strut. Both the sacks are
located well below the area of surface wave action and do not
introduce the problems attendant surface wave interaction. The
sacks are fashioned from a heavy, flexible material such as rubber
impregnated canvas or a heavy duty plastic sheet. In any event the
sacks are selectively inflatable by a source of pressurized gas 23
interconnected by conventional piping to inflate the sacks when an
increased buoying capability is called for. The flexible sacks are
bonded or otherwise suitably secured onto discrete portions of the
hull and the struts may be tailored to run the entire length of the
hull depending on the degree of buoyancy wanted. High speed
operation is somewhat impaired because of the sack's flexibility.
Another drawback of using flexible sacks is that they are
constantly exposed to external damage especially when the
semisubmerged ship is operating near docks and piers. Damage from
routine abuse also tends to shorten the sacks's useful life.
One attempt at reducing the flexible, inflatable sack's
vulnerability to damage is shown in the embodiment of FIGS. 4a and
4b. Here, a source of gas 23 is connected to a flexible, inflatable
sack 21 of the type referred to above and which is carried inside a
curved cover plate 24 joined to the hull by a hinge 24a and a latch
24b. When occasional buoyancy is needed, for example, when the
semisubmerged ship is entering a shallow harbor, or passing over a
reef, gas from source 23 is vented to inflatable sack 21 after
latch 24b has been released. Cover plate 24 is rotated in a
clockwise direction about hinge 24a as the sack fills with gas. In
this embodiment it has been found expedient to secure the sack to
the inner surface of the hinged cover plate so that when the sack
is inflated the cover plate is automatically rotated to release the
sack, and later, when the sack is evacuated, it pulls cover plate
24 back against hull 10 to be securely engaged by latch 24b.
Another modification employing a flexible flotation member is shown
in FIG. 5. An elongate resilient sleeve 25 is gripped at opposite
ends by large ring-like clamp members 26. A source of pressurized
gas, not shown in FIG. 5, is selectively vented to the interior of
resilient sleeve to produce the desired degree of supplemental
buoyancy.
The use of flexible sacks or sleeves is not entirely satisfactory
for high speed operation. The high water-flow rate over the
flexible surfaces causes fluctuation and other flow related
consequences.
In addition the flexible devices are vulnerable to puncture and
tearing.
An alternate mode of construction of the embodiment of FIG. 5 calls
for substituting a rigid torose-shaped sleeve 25 in place of an
inflatable resilient sleeve 25. Mounting a rigid sleeve does avoid
the flexible sleeve problems yet it introduces some of its own,
particularly when the sleeve is mounted on the external surface of
hull 10. If the sleeve is an integral unit, canard fin 15 would
have to be disassembled during installation and removal. If the
rigid sleeve is separated into longitudinal sections an improved
design, discussed below, would better serve the anticipated
needs.
Another modification for giving a semisubmerged ship a variable
buoyancy capability is shown in FIG. 6. A telescoping section 10a
of hull 10 is concentrically extended by an internally carried rack
and pinion mechanism, not shown for the sake of simplicity in the
drawings. Suitable seals are included to prevent the flooding of
the hulls and pressurized gas is vented to the interior of the
extended hull to reduce the possibility of flooding.
The preferred embodiments for providing the increased buoyancy
capability are shown in the variety of hull extensions
schematically depicted in FIGS. 7 through 10. These hull extensions
optionally extend part-way or all-the-way on opposite lateral sides
or on only one side of a hull, see hull extensions 30 in FIG. 11.
In the embodiment of FIG. 7 a single solid extension 31 is shaped
in a meniscoidal configuration with an inner surface fitting around
the circular hull 10 and with an outer surface shaped to
hydrodynamically cooperate with the surrounding water.
In this embodiment the hull extension is a rigid material having a
density less than water to provide a buoying force. Wood,
polyeurthane foam, and other equivalent materials may be used. In
this regard a material which affords a degree of protection from
underwater ordnance or submerged obstacles would be the best
choice.
The meniscoidal hull extension is releasably connected by a
plurality of bolts 32 or any other suitable connecting means. Using
bolts or an equivalent releasable connector, gives a semisubmerged
ship an immediate variable buoyancy capability. If a task calls for
a greater payload, then meniscoidal hull extensions having a larger
cross-sectional configuration are mounted on the hull. Considerable
mission flexibility is assured by having several sets of hull
extensions on hand. None of the herein described extensions
compromises the ship's structural integrity yet all give added
buoyancy and protection for the hulls.
The meniscoidal shaped extension, while greatly increasing the
hull's buoyancy does not create an excessive amount of drag or
impair the vessel's maneuverability. Experimental test data
indicates that the drag coefficient does not change appreciably
with the increased buoying capability. That is to say, by example,
the drag was increased no more than 10 percent with a 30 percent
increase in displacement.
The embodiment of FIG. 8 includes two rigid meniscoidal hull
extensions 31 also secured in place by bolts 32 or equivalent
means. The two hull extensions create more buoying force and
present a symetrical hull which reduces control and trim problems,
particularly in the single hull semisubmerged ship.
The embodiment of FIG. 9 has essentially the same cross-sectional
configuration as the embodiment of FIG. 8 but meniscoidal hull
extensions 31 are 31' are hollow and are compartmented to allow for
the storage of fuel, supplies, ordnance or to function as buoyancy
chambers depending on what is needed. Here again, the hull sections
are releasably coupled to the hulls by bolts 32' to give the ship a
variable buoyancy.
The embodiment of FIG. 10 shows a combination of a rigid
meniscoidal extension 31 and a compartmented meniscoidal extension
31' carried on an elliptical hull 10'. When a twin hull
semisubmerged ship is so modified, the rigid hull extension is
placed on the outside to further protect the hull while providing
buoyancy.
Particularly with respect to the embodiments of FIGS. 7, 8, 9 and
10 data has demonstrated that for a given increase in buoyancy the
drag does not appreciably increase. The semisubmerged ship's
structural integrity remains, it not sacrificed irrespective that
the ship's range and payload have been greatly increased.
Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present
invention are possible in the light of the above teachings, and, it
is therefore understood that within the scope of the disclosed
inventive concept, the invention may be practiced otherwise then
specifically described.
* * * * *