U.S. patent number 3,827,457 [Application Number 05/372,849] was granted by the patent office on 1974-08-06 for fluid pressure system for converting digital signals to analog signals.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Westinghouse Air Brake Company. Invention is credited to Donald Brown, Norman Vutz.
United States Patent |
3,827,457 |
Vutz , et al. |
August 6, 1974 |
FLUID PRESSURE SYSTEM FOR CONVERTING DIGITAL SIGNALS TO ANALOG
SIGNALS
Abstract
A fluid pressure system for converting a digital pressure signal
into an analog pressure by control of fluid pressure passing
through at least a pair of restrictors in series and by monitoring
the pressure between the two restrictors each one of which may be
characterized by a subsonic or sonic flow rate therethrough so as
to produce any combination of such flow rates therebetween,
depending upon the input pressure and the cross-sectional area and
geometric configuration of said restrictors.
Inventors: |
Vutz; Norman (Radnor, PA),
Brown; Donald (Monroeville, PA) |
Assignee: |
Westinghouse Air Brake Company
(Wilmerding, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
23469872 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/372,849 |
Filed: |
June 22, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
137/599.07 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B60T
13/665 (20130101); F15C 1/00 (20130101); F15B
11/0426 (20130101); F15B 2211/455 (20130101); F15B
2211/426 (20130101); F15B 2211/40592 (20130101); Y10T
137/87314 (20150401); F15B 2211/20538 (20130101); F15B
2211/40515 (20130101); F15B 2211/40507 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B60T
13/66 (20060101); F15B 11/042 (20060101); F15B
11/00 (20060101); F15C 1/00 (20060101); G05d
007/03 (); F15c 003/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;137/561,599,599.1,601
;91/31 ;235/2R,21ME |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Cline; William R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McIntire, Jr.; Ralph W.
Claims
Having now described the invention, what we claim as new and desire
to secure by Letters Patent, is:
1. A control pressure pilot valve device for converting a digital
pressure to an analog control pressure transmitted to a control
device for operation thereof, said pilot valve device
comprising:
a. at least two upstream restrictors of preselected flow capacity
and each having the upstream side thereof connected to first
passage means via which fluid at a constant pressure may be
supplied concurrently to said upstream restrictors;
b. respective upstream valve devices each having one end connected
to respective opposite sides of said upstream restrictors and each
having the opposite end connected to second passage means,
c. said upstream valve devices being selectively operable, either
singly or in any combination thereof, to respective open positions,
in which the respective upstream restrictor connected thereto is
communicated with said second passage means, and to respective
closed positions in which the said respective upstream restrictor
is cut off from said second passage means, said second passage
means being communicable with the control device for transmitting
thereto analog control pressure at a degree effected by the
combination of opened and closed positions of the upstream valve
devices;
d. a downstream restrictor having one end connected to said second
passage means; and
e. a downstream valve device having one side connected to the other
end of said downstream restrictor, the other side of said
downstream valve device being open to atmosphere, said downstream
valve device being operable to an open position, in which said
second passage means is opened to atmosphere, and being operable to
a closed position, in which said second passage means is cut off
from atmosphere, for further controlling the degree of analog
pressure prevailing in the second passage means.
2. A control pressure pilot valve device, as set forth in claim 1,
wherein the dimensions of the flow area of one or more of said
upstream restrictors are different from the others.
3. A control pressure pilot valve device, as set forth in claim 2,
further characterized by operator's control means for effecting
selective operation of said upstream and downstream valve
devices.
4. A control pressure pilot valve device, as set forth in claim 3,
wherein said operator's control means comprises an electrical
controller incorporating a binary code system and including a
control panel for selecting the desired code and consequent
combination of valve operation.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In fluid pressure operable systems wherein valve devices are
employed for effecting supply of control pressure at varying
degrees to other fluid pressure operable devices, such as in a
railway train brake system, for example, wherein a manually
operable engineer's brake valve is operable to a plurality of
positions for effecting supply of control fluid, at a preselected
degree, to the relay portion of the brake control valve, the degree
of such control pressure thus delivered to the brake control valve
should be highly accurate in order to avoid overbraking or
underbraking of the train. The engineer's brake valve device
noramlly includes a manually operable handle which the operator
moves to a selected position, according to his experience and
judgment, that will effect delivery of control pressure at the
desired degree. Although the operator's experience normally permits
him to operate the brake valve with a high degree of accuracy in
effecting delivery of control pressure at the desired degree, there
is no positive assurance that such will occur with each operation,
especially in the case of an operator with little experience.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The object of the present invention, therefore, is to provide
apparatus for supplying control fluid at a precise, measured
pressure, said apparatus being characterized in that it may be
operated without the necessity of judgment in the part of the
operator in positioning an operating handle.
Basically, the invention comprises a plurality of control pressure
supply restrictors, either of identical flow rate capacities or of
various flow rate capacities, connected in parallel relation to
each other between an upstream source of control fluid at a contant
preselected pressure and a downstream atmospheric restrictor.
Respective individually operable cut-off valve devices, which may
be of the type operated manually or of the type operated by remote
controlled power means, are connected to the downstram side of each
of the supply restrictors in interposed relation between each of
said supply restrictors so that one or more of said supply
restrictors may be cut out or cut in, as desired, to produce the
desired control pressure which is tapped off between said
atmospheric restrictor and a common conduit connected to all of
said supply restrictors and leading to the device to be supplied
with such control pressure. A cut-off valve similar to those above
described may be connected to the downstream or outlet side of the
atmospheric restrictor for further control of the pressure tapped
off via the common conduit for the device to be controlled thereby.
The apparatus may be constructed in the form of a manifold in which
the several cut-off valves may be disposed and in which the several
restrictors may be machined according to specified dimensions and
cross-sectional configuration.
In the drawing, FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic of the basic principle of
operation of the invention; FIG. 2 is also a diagrammatic of a
further development of the basic illustration shown in FIG. 1; and
FIG. 3 is a sectional view of a digitial to analog pressure
converter device embodying the invention.
DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
For purposes of illustrating the basic principle of the invention,
FIG. 1 diagrammatically shows an upstream restrictor or choke
member 1 connected in series to a downstream restrictor or choke
member 2 by means of conduits 3, 4 and 5. In this case, fluid at a
constant preselected pressure, flowing in the direction indicated
by the arrows, is supplied to conduit 3 and flows through
restrictor 1, through conduit 4, and through restrictor 5 to
atmosphere. A tap-off conduit 6 is connected to conduit 4 between
the two restrictors 1 and 2. Thus the volume between restrictors 1
and 2, as tapped by conduit 6, reflects an analog pressure
resulting from the digital pressure supplied at conduit 3. By
varying the flow areas of the upstream and downstream restrictors 1
and 2, respectively, it is possible to obtain various combinations
of sonic/subsonic flow rates through the restrictors.
Depending upon the cross-sectional dimension and the effective
pressure at the source, restrictors may be classified as sonic or
subsonic.
If the restrictor is subsonic, the flow rate thereof depends upon
the square root of the pressure differential across the restrictor.
This condition may be represented by the formula R =
C.sqroot..DELTA.P, where R is the flow rate of the restrictor, C is
a constant determined by the geometric cross-sectional
configuration of the restrictor, and .DELTA.P is the pressure
differential across the restrictor. The pressure output, or
P.sub.o, of a subsonic restrictor is always greater than one half
the pressure input, or P.sub.i, or expressed mathematically,
P.sub.o >P.sub.i /2.
If the restrictor is sonic, the flow rate thereof depends on the
upstream pressure only, assuming the temperature to be constant.
This condition may be represented by the formula R = kP, where R is
the flow rate, k is a constant determined by the physical
characteristics of the restrictor (such as the dimensions,
geometric configuration, surface conditions, the effects of
temperature, etc.), and P is the pressure input. The pressure
output, or P.sub.o, of a sonic restrictor is always less than one
half the pressure input, or P.sub.i, or expressed mathematically,
P.sub.o <P.sub.i /2.
It should be noted, however, that even though the respective values
of both constants C and k, as above set forth, depend on
corresponding physical features of the restrictors, in the case
where several restrictors having identical physical features are
involved, the respective values of the constants C and k will not
necessarily be the same but will differ between sonic and subsonic
flow rate conditions.
The subject matter and the related formulae contained in the three
paragraphs immediately preceding may be confirmed by reference to
Vol. 73, pages 639 through 647 of the Transactions of ASME, 1951,
under the title of Discharge Coefficients of Small-Diameter
Orifices and Nozzles by H. P. Grace & C. E. Lapple.
By interposing an on-off upstream valve device 7 and an on-off
downstream valve device 8 in pipes 4 and 5 downstream of
restrictors 1 and 2, respectively, as shown in FIG. 2, digital
control is obtained. If the downstream valve device 8 is shut off,
an analog pressure at one limit, that is at a pressure equal to the
constant source pressure in pipe 3 is produced in the tap-off pipe
6. The analog pressure in pipe 6 may be read on a pressure gauge 9
connected thereto. By closing upstream valve 7 and opening
downstream valve 8, flow through restrictor 1 is stopped and the
volume comprising pipes 4 and 6 is vented via restrictor 2 to
produce an analog pressure at a second limit equal to atmosphere.
By opening both valves 7 and 8 an analog pressure between the two
limits is obtained, the value of such analog pressure thus obtained
being dependent upon the relationship between the flow areas of the
upstream and downstream restrictors 1 and 2 as well as the
respective upstream pressure of each of said restrictors to
determine the sonic/subsonic combination produced. The pressure
limits obtainable for the four sonic/subsonic combinations possible
with two restrictors in series are as follows:
TYPE OF FLOW THROUGH THE RESTRICTORS LIMITS OF ANALOG PRESSURE
UPSTREAM RESTRICTOR DOWNSTREAM RESTRICTOR LOWEST HIGHEST
__________________________________________________________________________
(a) Subsonic Subsonic 1 atmosphere <P.sub.o <P.sub.i ( b)
Sonic Subsonic 1 atmosphere <P.sub.o <P.sub.i /2 (c) Subsonic
Sonic 2 atmospheres <P.sub.o <P.sub.i -( d) Sonic Sonic 2
atmospheres <P.sub.o <P.sub.i /2
__________________________________________________________________________
In considering combination (a), for example, in which both the
upstream restrictor 1 and the downstream restrictor 2 are subsonic,
it should be apparent that P.sub.i could be adjusted downwardly to
approach one atmosphere (but not actually reduced to one
atmosphere, otherwise there would be no flow). For purposes of
convenience, however, this P.sub.i will be called one atmosphere.
If the constriction of downstream restrictor 2 is reduced to a
point just short of that point at which an increase of P.sub.i from
one atmosphere up to a P.sub.i just short of producing a sonic flow
through the upstream restrictor 1, then the highest possible
P.sub.o for a subsonic/subsonic combination of the restrictors 1
and 2, respectively, would approach P.sub.i, since, as above noted,
P.sub.o <P.sub.i /2. For convenience, therefore, it is said that
the highest limit of output or P.sub.o in the subsonic/subsonic
combination is input pressure or P.sub.i.
In considering combination (b), that is when upstream restrictor 1
is sonic and downstream restrictor 2 is subsonic, the lowest
possible P.sub.i can be close to one atmosphere (that is, just
above one atmosphere, as above discussed). P.sub.i can then be
increased from one atmosphere up to a pressure just short of
causing the downstream restrictor 2 to go into a sonic flow rate.
In this case, since the pressure leaving the upstream restrictor 1,
which is sonic, must be less than P.sub.i /2, the upper limit of
analog pressure at gauge 9 can only approach P.sub.i /2.
By applying similar logic to cases (c) and (d) in the above table,
one skilled in the art can readily understand how the lower and
upper analog pressure limits are derived for each case.
The principles relating to restrictors, as above described, may be
applied to a device, which may be called a pilot device, used in
providing a control pressure to a second operating or control
device. If the characteristic of the control device is such as to
require a wide range of analog control pressures, it would not be
practical to try to provide said wide range of control pressure by
varying the respective flow areas of the two restrictors 1 and 2.
If, for example, it is desired to replace an engineer's brake valve
in a railway brake system with a more compact pilot valve device of
equivalent versility and of the type herein described and embodying
the invention, such a device may be like the one shown in FIG.
3.
As shown in FIG. 3, the pilot valve device may comprise a casing
having a restrictor section 10 and a valve section 11, the two
sections being sealingly joined by any suitable means not shown.
The restrictor section 10 has disposed therein a plurality or
preselected number of upstream restrictors R.sub.1, R.sub.2,
R.sub.3, etc. having the input ends thereof connected in parallel
relation via a passageway 12 to a common source of constant
pressure, in this case a feed pipe 13 of the brake system.
The output ends of the restrictors R.sub.1, R.sub.2, R.sub.3, etc.
are connected to respective inlet ends of upstream flow control
valve devices V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3, etc. of the open-closed
type disposed in valve section 11, said valve devices having the
outlet ends thereof connected in parallel relation via a passageway
14 to a downstream restrictor 15 which, in turn, is connected
serially to the inlet of a downstream flow control valve device 16,
both said downstream restrictor and downstream valve device also
being disposed in valve section 11. The outlet side of downstream
valve device 16 is connected to a pipe 18 leading to a device such
as the relay valve portion (not shown) of the brake control valve
device (not shown).
If all the parallel connected upstream restrictors R.sub.1,
R.sub.2, R.sub.3, etc. are of identical flow area, then the analog
pressure delivered via pipe 18 may be progressively increased by
sequentially opening the appropriate upstream control valves
V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3, etc. This simulates varying the flow
area of a single restrictor in a step wise fashion to produce the
desired analog pressure between the upstream and downstream
restrictors, said analog pressure being fed via pipe 18 to the
relay valve of the brake control valve, which in turn, as is well
known to those skilled in the art, controls brake pipe pressure for
applying or releasing the train brakes.
Since discrete steps of brake pipe pressure control are effected in
the manner above described, a binary digital method of controlling
operation of the valves V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3, etc. would
possibly provide a very practical means of approaching a pure
analog control pressure which is essential in obtaining smooth
variations of brake pipe pressure control. The number of pressure
levels obtainable with the pilot valve device shown in FIG. 3 is
2.sup.n.sup.-1, where n indicates the number of upstream
restrictors. The respective values of the pressure increments
comprising a pressure level is determined by the respective
restrictor sizes and the valves opened for effecting the resultant
upstream to downstream flow range.
It should be apparent that the upstream restrictors R.sub.1,
R.sub.2, R.sub.3, etc., as well as the downstream restrictor 15, do
not have to be of identical dimension. The dimensions and the
number of the several restrictors may vary according to the
specifications of the application of the invention. It should also
be noted, however, that the total flow area resulting from the
restrictor or combination of restrictors, as effected by the binary
control logic, should be such as to produce pressure steps of
fairly close values so as to allow a smooth transition from one
pressure level to the next.
Control of the upstream valves V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3, etc. may
be effected in the desired binary fashion by any suitable well
known manual, electrical, or fluid pressure means. An electrical
valve controller 19 connected by multiple-wire conductors 20 and 21
to the several valve devices V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3, etc., and
incorporating a binary code system, for example, is represented
symbolically in the drawing, it being considered that such control
means are so well known in the art that a detailed description
thereof is not deemed essential to an understanding of the
invention. The controller 19 is provided with a control panel 22
which the operator uses in selecting any combination of the valves
V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3, etc. that he desires to operate in
effecting the described analog control pressure.
* * * * *