U.S. patent number 3,825,991 [Application Number 05/327,575] was granted by the patent office on 1974-07-30 for method of making golf club head.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Cornell Forge Company. Invention is credited to Alverin M. Cornell.
United States Patent |
3,825,991 |
Cornell |
July 30, 1974 |
METHOD OF MAKING GOLF CLUB HEAD
Abstract
A golf club iron head is made in two pieces instead of as a
single piece forging in order to make possible appreciable
economies in the forging of the head. The partition is made in the
hosel, a short stub next to the blade of the club being made as a
forging integrally with the blade and the remainder of the hosel
being machined from a bar with an automatic screw machine.
Alternatively the remainder of the hosel can be made from tubing
suitably finished and cut off to length. The two parts are united
by a permanent bonding procedure to form a substantially "standard"
iron club head.
Inventors: |
Cornell; Alverin M. (Hinsdale,
IL) |
Assignee: |
Cornell Forge Company (Chicago,
IL)
|
Family
ID: |
26865525 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/327,575 |
Filed: |
January 29, 1973 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
169942 |
Aug 9, 1971 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
29/412; 72/377;
228/164; 473/305; 29/525.08; 29/525.13; 29/525.11 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A63B
53/047 (20130101); A63B 53/04 (20130101); B23P
13/00 (20130101); Y10T 29/49959 (20150115); Y10T
29/49963 (20150115); Y10T 29/49966 (20150115); Y10T
29/49789 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
B23P
13/00 (20060101); A63B 53/04 (20060101); B23p
017/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;29/475,428,412,414,DIG.20 ;273/167G,167R,167K,80.2-80.8
;72/377X |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Moon; Charlie T.
Parent Case Text
This is a continuation-in-part of my copending application Ser. No.
169942 filed Aug. 9, 1971, now abandoned for Golf Club Head and
Method Of Making Same.
Claims
I claim:
1. The method of making an iron golf club head having a blade, a
substantially flat ball-striking surface on the blade, and a
substantially round hosel extending angularly from said blade, said
method comprising shaping a billet of iron of substantially
cylindrical form by compression between dies to form the blade and
lower portion of the hosel, shaping a substantially cylindrical bar
of iron by a mechanical material removing process and joining the
cylindrical bar to the lower portion of the hosel on the blade to
form a complete hosel.
2. The method as described in claim 1, said compression step
comprising a series of blows struck by forging dies.
3. The method described in claim 1, and including the further steps
of forming a second golf club head simultaneously with said
first-mentioned golf club head between dies, said second golf club
head having a blade, a substantially flat ball-striking surface on
the blade and the base portion of a substantially round hosel
extending angularly from said blade, said dies having pairs of
cavities forming two golf club heads arranged with their blades
substantially coplanar and in end-to-end relation to one
another.
4. The method described in claim 3, and including the steps of
arranging the blades in the die in space relation to one another
and forming the base portions of the hosels for the heads as
integral parts of the blades disposed in crossed relation to one
another in the space between said blades.
5. The method of making an iron golf club head having a blade, a
substantially flat ball-striking surface on the blade, and a
substantially round hosel extending angularly from said blade, said
method comprising shaping a billet of iron of substantially
cylindrical form by compression between dies to form the blade and
lower portion of the hosel, shaping a substantially cylindrical bar
of iron by a turning process, and joining the cylindrical bar to
the lower portion of the hosel on the blade to form a complete
hosel.
Description
This invention relates to a method of making golf club heads.
Although golf club iron heads differ slightly from one another for
a given numbered club in accordance with individual designers'
preferences, they are almost universally made as forgings. The golf
club head blade and the hosel by which the head is secured to the
lower end of the club shaft are made integrally as a single piece
forging, but since the blade size and shape and its angular
disposition relative to the hosel vary as between differently
numbered clubs, a number of problems arise in determining the most
economical way to carry out the forging process.
Initially, iron club heads were made one at a time, starting with a
long round bar the end of which was heated to forging temperature
and then placed between staged forging dies to hammer the heated
bar end into the desired shape. Where the heads are made of special
metals, such for example as stainless steel, they may still be made
one at a time. Good die design dictates that there be a minimum of
"locks" or depressions in the die and that the head be as flat as
possible, to minimize the depth of such locks as are unavoidable to
obtain the desired golf club shape.
It has been appreciated for many years that substantial economies
could be achieved in the forging of workpieces if two or more
workpieces could be forged at the same time in appropriately
designed multiple cavity dies. The same number of blows of the
hammer spaced the same time intervals apart as are used in forming
a single forged workpiece can form two or more workpieces, and thus
twice as many workpieces are made per unit time using the same man
hours as a single workpiece. In the forging process, however,
longitudinal movement of metal in the dies is to be avoided since
such movement results in undue wear of the dies by abrasion. The
workpiece therefore should have such shape as to approach
volumetrically at all sections from end to end the volume of the
starting billet. Since the starting billet in the case of the golf
club heads is a round bar, the forging process for them should
arrange each head in the die in such manner as to satisfy the
requirement of a uniform volume of metal from end to end of the
die. Any substantial deviation from this requirement makes
necessary the inclusion of one or more preliminary drawing
operations to reduce the amount of metal in specified regions of
the billet to match the requirements of the die. The ultimate test
of the correctness of the die design is the uniformity of the flash
around the workpiece as it leaves the forging die.
The hosel of a golf club head is relatively long and thin and has
been found to require less metal per unit length than the blade of
which it is an integral part. When such heads are made singly, a
preliminary drawing operation is required to form the hosel. When,
some 20 years ago, economic pressures required that the cost of
forging club heads be reduced, various ways of forging two heads at
once were thoroughly explored. It was found that the hosel required
approximately one-half the metal used in the blade, and hence if
the hosels of two heads were disposed side by side in the die and
the blades took the positions dictated by the desired shape of the
finished club, the requirements of equal volume per unit length
would be at least approximately satisfied.
The ideal arrangement of the club heads in the die would be to have
the blades coplanar, but because of the angularity and length of
the hosels, such side-by-side arrangement of the hosels would
result in a crossing of the hosels and a correspondingly deep and
thin lock in the dies which more than offset the advantage of
forging two at a time. It was determined therefore that the hosels
should be disposed parallel with one another and that the blades
should be allowed to take the positions dictated by their angular
disposition relative to the hosels. This made for a relatively long
billet and hence limited to two the quantity that could be formed
at one time in a die. The next multiple would have been four, and
this would have required a long heated billet which, at forging
temperature might bend of its own weight and complicate the
handling of the billet.
Thus the forging of golf club heads has remained substantially
unchanged for approximately 20 years, despite the existence of
severe competition which would normally lead to changes directed
toward cost reduction and the competitive advantage resulting
therefrom. In view of the continual pressure for reduced cost of
producing golf club iron heads and the advantages such reduction
produces in the market place, it is one of the principal objects of
this invention to provide a method of making golf club iron heads
which substantially reduces the cost of such heads without
appreciably altering the shape, appearance or "feel" of the club
incorporating such head.
Another important object of this invention is to provide a golf
club head the form of which has been designed with a view to
eliminating undesirably large locks in a forging die by which it is
made and to take greatest advantage of the economies of manufacture
offered by the forging process.
As a more specific object this invention has within its purview the
manufacture of a golf club iron head in separate parts, one by a
forging process and the other by a screw machine process, and to
unite the parts to form a complete head, the part made by a screw
machine process being removed from the forging die to result in a
golf club iron head which is substantially flat over its entire
length and easily and economically made in multiple by the forging
process.
These and other objects of this invention, will become apparent
from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment
of the invention when taken together with the accompanying drawings
in which:
FIG. 1 is an elevational view of a typical golf club iron head in
finished form presently made by a forging process;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the golf club head of FIG. 1
as viewed from the right in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a round bar constituting the billet from which the head
is made;
FIGS. 4-7 show the billet in various stages of formation into a
golf club head by the prior art process;
FIG. 8 is an elevational view of the finished billet taken along
line 8--8 of FIG. 7.
FIG. 9 represents an alternative arrangement of the club heads in a
die;
FIG. 10 is an elevational view of a golf club iron head made in
accordance with this invention;
FIG. 11 shows the head of FIG. 10 in exploded view, prior to
assembly;
FIG. 12 is a view of the starting billet for making the head of
FIG. 11;
FIGS. 13 and 14 show the head of FIG. 10 in various stages of
formation;
FIG. 15 is an enlarged elevational view of the finished billet of
FIG. 14, taken along line 15--15 of FIG. 14; and
FIG. 16 is an exploded view of a modification of the golf club head
of FIG. 10.
According to the present invention, economies ranging from 20
percent to 35 percent in the cost of manufacturing golf club iron
heads are achieved by making the head in two parts, one of which is
made by the forging process and the other by a screw machine
process, the two parts then being permanently joined or bonded to
form a golf club iron head having the same shape and "feel" as the
one presently made as a single piece forging. One part of the novel
head comprises the blade and the base or lower portion of the hosel
and is made by the forging process. The other part comprises the
upper part or remainder of the hosel and and is round so that it
can be made by the machining process. The upper part is suitably
centered and dowelled into the lower hosel part and preferably
bonded thereto.
The short hosel part formed integrally with the blade in a drop
forge permits the disposition of two golf club heads in the dies
with the ball-striking surfaces of the blades thereof substantially
coplanar and aligned end-for-end with the hosels crossed and
sloping upward. The coplanar ball-striking surfaces reduce locks to
a minimum which is highly desirable, and the short stubby hosel
part does not create any unduly deep locks such as would require a
drawing operation. The two lower hosel parts, though crossed and
not coplanar as in the prior art method together have a
cross-sectional area approaching that of the billet from which they
are made. The overall length of the heads arranged in a multiple
cavity die is less than the corresponding dimension of the same two
heads with long hosels arranged with their hosel parallel with one
another. The reduced overall length thus makes possible the
production of another pair of heads simultaneously with the first
pair from an adjacent part of the heated rod, and effects a further
economy in the cost of producing the heads.
Thus with reduced locks and substantially coplanar ball-striking
surfaces on the blades, the method of this invention reduces the
initial cost of the dies, reduces wear of the dies, and makes
possible more reworkings of the die blocks before they become too
thin and structurally weak in the drop forge. It also reduces the
number of strokes of the hammer required to form a golf club head.
The sum of these reductions amounts to from 25 percent to 35
percent of the former cost of forging a golf club head.
Referring now to the drawings for a detailed description of the
invention, a comparison is made between the old and new methods. In
the old method shown in FIGS. 1-8, FIG. 1 shows a typical golf club
iron head 20 having a horizontally extending blade 21 and an
upwardly extending hosel 22 formed integrally therewith. Blade 21
is inclined to the vertical as shown in FIG. 2 in varying degrees
depending upon the club number. Hosel 22 is also inclined to the
vertical as shown in FIG. 1 in the general plane of blade 21. It
may be apparent that the volume of metal in the hosel is less than
the volume of metal in the blade and is, in fact, approximately
one-half that of the blade. Thus by placing two hosels in parallel
side-by-side relation as shown in FIG. 7 the sum of the volumes of
the two hosels approximates that of one blade. Two golf club heads
can therefore be made simultaneously from a single heated billet 23
of round bar such as the one shown in FIG. 3.
The side-by-side arrangement of the hosels requires a saw-tooth
shape in the billet in one plane. This shape is given the billet in
a first stage in the dies 24, 25 shown in FIG. 4, the said dies in
closed position being shown in FIG. 5. In these dies, any slight
drawing of the billet to distribute the metal thereof more
advantageously can be effected.
Following the bending of the billet into the sawtooth contour of
FIG. 4, the billet is placed on its side in another section of the
die to receive the preliminary shape 26 of the club heads, the
metal being moved in a predominantly transverse direction as shown
in FIG. 6. The final shape is given the club heads in the last
section of the die as shown in FIG. 7, the excess metal being moved
into the flash 27. If the die design is correct, and the
manipulation of the billet in the die by the hammer operator is
also correct the flash will be of substantially uniform width and
thickness around the forging. The final stage is a trimming
operation (not shown) in which the heads are separated and the
flash is removed.
In the method and die design of FIGS. 1-7 just described, the two
club head cavities in the dies are arranged with their hosels
substantially horizontal and side-by-side so that their vertical
profile will be low and hence will not require a deep lock. This
profile is shown in FIG. 8. The blades take whatever position is
dictated by their particular shape and angularity, and as may be
observed, they necessitate the formation of some locks in the dies.
Furthermore, the blades are not aligned with one another and they
are separated by the long hosels, making for a long cavity in the
die.
The alternative disposition of the two heads in a die would be to
have their respective blades horizontal and coplanar and their
hosels side-by-side, but extending upward at the angles dictated by
the particular shape of the club head. Such disposition of the
heads in the die is shown in FIG. 9. It is immediately apparent
that the hosels 22 not only extend upwardly an intolerable
distance, but they are crossed and require extensive drawing of the
billet to fill the relatively thin and long locks in which they are
formed. These insurmountable difficulties drove die designers away
from the horizontal blade disposition of FIG. 9 for many years
until the present invention and compelled them to use the parallel
hosel disposition shown in FIG. 7.
I have discovered that the horizontal blade disposition with the
crossed hosels heretofore thought to be impractical could
nevertheless be used and with a marked reduction in cost of
manufacture, provided that the construction of the club head was
altered so that the forging process could be used for that part of
the head for which it was particularly well adapted and that an
inexpensive screw machine process could be used for that part of
the head which lent itself especially well for that process.
Specifically, I have found that the round hosel could be made
cheaply as a screw machine part, and the remainder of the club
could be made by the forging process including the base of the
hosel, and that the forged base of the hosel could be subsequently
machined inexpensively to accept the screw machine-made hosel.
Advertng now to FIGS. 10-15 and first to FIGS. 14 and 15 it may be
observed that when the blades are disposed in substantially
horizontal position with their hosels adjacent and parallel to one
another and the blades arranged with their center lines 38 and 39
substantially coinciding, only the round portions of the hosels
would prevent the adoption of this arrangement in the dies (FIG.
9). According to this invention therefore, the upper round hosel
portions are eliminated from the forging process, leaving only the
bases thereof as integral portions of the blades. The resulting
profile as shown in FIG. 15 becomes immediately acceptable for the
forging process. The hosels are then made separately by a screw
machine process and joined to the base portions thereof on the
blades.
The complete iron club head of this invention is shown in FIG. 10.
It is outwardly substantially identical to the club head of FIG. 1.
It has an identical blade 28 and the base 29 of the hosel 30 is
integrally formed therewith. The round upper part of the hosel is
shown at 31 and is machined to have an integral pin 32 (FIG. 11)
adapted to fit snugly into a corresponding recess 33 in the upper
end of hosel base 29, said upper hosel part 31, in turn, having a
cylindrical recess 34 to receive the cylindrical end 35 of the club
shaft. The connection between pin 32 and recess 33 may be a
threaded connection if desired, or it may simply be a bonded
connection using an epoxy type of bonding agent. The connection
between shaft end 35 and recess 34 may also be a bonded
connection.
In the formation of the forged head of FIG. 10, the starting billet
may be the heated end 36 of a round bar 37. Since only the bases of
the hosels are formed in the forging dies, the club heads may be
arranged as shown in FIG. 14 with their center lines 38, 39 as
extensions of one another. This arrangement eliminates the bending
step of FIG. 4 so that the first stage of the die can be used to
spread the metal transversely to form the rough blade. This stage
is shown in FIG. 13. The second and final stage gives the heads
their finished forged shape as shown in FIG. 14. The trimming stage
follows as in FIG. 7.
Although the steps of forming a recess, assembling the upper hosel
part to the blade and bonding the two together are additional steps
with reference to the prior art FIG. 1 form, it has been found that
the cost of the forging operation can be reduced to such an extent
that the cost of forming and assembling the round hosel part as a
machined part is readily absorbed and yet an overall saving of 25
percent in the cost of the finished club head can be easily
achieved. Further substantial savings can be effected by forming
four club heads simultaneously, the four heads being arranged in
end-to-end relation. It may be observed, for example, that the
overall length of the heated billet needed to form two heads as in
FIG. 13 is shorter than that required to form the two heads of FIG.
6, and hence no undue length of heated bar need be handled to form
four heads simultaneously by the new arrangement.
The turned or screw-machine formed portion of the hosel is more
simply made as a cylindrical part rather than as a part tapered
downward toward the base as is standard design at present.
The tapered form yielded a tapered recess to receive the lower
shaft end. Golf club shafts have for years been made from metal
tubing having a series of cylindrical steps of progressively
decreasing diameter formed therein from the grip end of the shaft
to the head end. The last step, although initially made cylindrical
like the other steps, was subsequently changed to a tapered contour
to fit into the tapered hosel recess. The length of shaft for each
numbered club is different and hence the taper had to be tailored
to each club so that the manufacturer had to make and stock stepped
shafts for each numbered club. By eliminating the taper, the
manufacturer can make one length of stepped shaft and then cut the
shaft to the length required for a given numbered club. The
elimination of the tapering operation in forming the last step was
recognized as desirable by golf club manufacturers because of the
elimination of the expense of maintaining large inventories of
shaft sizes, but the tapered hosel dictated a tapered recess which
then made the tapered shaft end mandatory.
The present method produces a cylindrical hosel and a cylindrical
recess and hence makes readily possible a cylindrical shape for the
last step of the club shaft with its attendant lower cost for each
shaft and reduced inventory size.
The golf club head of FIG. 16 differs from that of FIG. 10 in that
the hosel 40 is not drilled as in FIG. 10, but is formed in the
forging dies with a pilot pin 41 which is finished by a recessed
mill to fit with a snug fit into the lower end 42 of a tube 43
forming the upper end of the finished hosel. The shaft 35 of the
club is inserted into the upper end of tube 43 until it abuts pin
41. As in the FIG. 10 form, the tube may be bonded to pin 41 and
shaft 35 with a suitable epoxy bonding agent.
Tube 43 may be made by an extrusion process, by a seamless welding
process from sheet material or by a screw machine process. If made
by an extrusion or seamless welding process, it is appropriately
cut off to length from tube stock by a material removing process
such as cutting, sawing or grinding.
The form shown in FIG. 16 reverses the location of the pin 32 and
hence eliminates the drilling operation in the hosel of the head
which is normally formed to taper toward the heel of the club. The
taper provides a diminishing diameter of the hosel into which to
drill and reduces the wall thickness of the hosel to a point where
an undesirably high degree of accuracy might be required in the
drilling operation.
Thus by departing from long established custom in the manufacture
of iron golf club heads and dividing the heads into parts, each of
which lends itself uniquely to a different, but for it, the least
expensive process, a very substantial economy in the manufacture of
a complete head is achieved. Not only are fewer strokes in the drop
forge required to form the forged part, but a less expensive die
results since the cavities are shallower and require less machining
time for their formation. The shallower cavities make possible a
greater number of reworkings of the dies when they become too worn
for further use, before the die blocks must be discarded as too
thin for further use.
Although the billet has been described above as being heated, it is
contemplated that high-pressure cold forming processes may be used
instead, the arrangement of the cavities in the dies for the latter
process remaining substantially the same. It is also understood
that for the higher numbered club heads in which the angle of the
blade relative to the hosel base is greatest some compromise may be
made in the disposition of the blade in the die to avoid excessive
angularity of the hosel bases with the horizontal. Such compromise,
however, does not in any material way impede the use of the process
of this invention.
* * * * *