U.S. patent number 3,825,142 [Application Number 05/232,412] was granted by the patent office on 1974-07-23 for thermoplastic shielded glass bottle.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Dart Industries Inc.. Invention is credited to Edward R. Campagna.
United States Patent |
3,825,142 |
Campagna |
July 23, 1974 |
THERMOPLASTIC SHIELDED GLASS BOTTLE
Abstract
A container comprising an inner glass receptacle and a closely
adhereing exterior protective sheath substantially covering said
receptacle. The exterior protective is comprised of a
shape-retaining, preferably thermoplastic resin adapted to restrain
and retain glass fragments should the glass receptacle be broken.
The sheath is further provided with a plurality of outwardly
protruding nodular means that lend a roughened appearance to the
sheath surface and which produce a surface elevation variance from
the mean thickness of the sheath by between about 6 and 60 percent.
This surface characteristic minimizes the container surface
frictional resistance, increases shock resistance and provides
maximum non-slip characteristics to the sheath when the container
is hand-held.
Inventors: |
Campagna; Edward R.
(Horseheads, NY) |
Assignee: |
Dart Industries Inc. (Los
Angeles, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
27388723 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/232,412 |
Filed: |
March 7, 1972 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
162103 |
Jul 13, 1971 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
215/12.2;
215/DIG.6 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C03C
17/32 (20130101); B65D 23/0814 (20130101); Y10T
428/1321 (20150115); Y10T 428/24355 (20150115); Y10T
428/31645 (20150401); Y10S 215/06 (20130101); Y10T
428/31507 (20150401) |
Current International
Class: |
B65D
23/00 (20060101); B65D 23/08 (20060101); C03C
17/28 (20060101); C03C 17/32 (20060101); B65d
023/08 () |
Field of
Search: |
;215/1R,1C,12R,DIG.6
;161/2,116,117,119,124,164 ;117/17.5,18,33.3,37R,41
;313/110,116,117 ;356/108,109 ;350/164,165 ;431/94 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Price; William I.
Assistant Examiner: Marcus; Stephen
Parent Case Text
CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This is a continuation in part of my earlier application Ser. No.
162,103 filed July 13, 1971.
Claims
I claim:
1. A shatter-resistant composite bottle having base means, side
walls and a neck portion comprising a pressurizable inner glass
envelope having a mean side wall thickness of between about 0.030
inches and 0.120 inches and a thermoplastic resin outer envelope of
a mean thickness of between about 0.004 inches and 0.018 inches
surrounds said inner envelope and extends over substantially the
entirety thereof said outer envelope being further characterized in
that its exterior surface is randomly nodularly configured and has
a mean deviation value of about 12 and 18 percent above that of the
outer envelope thickness and a mean deviation value of about
between 8 and 12 percent below that of the outer envelope
thickness.
2. A shatter-resistant composite bottle comprising an inner glass
envelope having a mean sidewall thickness of between about 0.030
inches and 0.120 inches and an outer envelope of a thermoplastic
material having a mean thickness of between about 0.004 inches and
0.018 inches extends over substantially the entirety of said inner
glass envelope excepting the finish thereof, the exterior surface
of said outer envelope being further characterized in that it is
nodularly configured and has a maximum elevation above said mean
varying between about 6 and 60 percent thereof.
3. A shatter-resistant composite bottle according to claim 2
wherein said outer envelope is additionally characterized in that
its maximum deflection below said mean thickness varies between
about 20 and 40 percent thereof.
Description
This invention concerns protectively sheathed glassware containers
and, more particularly, concerns glass receptacles which are so
protected by an outer plastic envelope that substantially covers
the exterior surface thereof.
As is well known in the trade, glassware is readily susceptable to
breakage during handling and use. Further, the consequences of such
breakage may be significantly aggravated if the contained product
is carbonated or the container thereof is otherwise internally
pressurized. Therefore, it has long been an objective of glassware
manufacturers and users to minimize the hazards of breakage by
treating the exterior surface in numerous ways and by even adding
protective overcoatings of various sorts thereto. These prior art
approaches have, in fact, improved glassware standards and quality
quite significantly since such have tended to effectively reduce
the quantity of surface scratches and flaws in the ware and, of
course, this reduction in the points of stress concentration enable
the ware to retain its characteristic strength.
Such prior art surface treatments, for example, have included metal
oxide, and combinations of thin film polyethylene coatings which
provide good scratch and abrasion resistance to glassware thereby
decreasing the surface flaws spoken of and likewise reducing the
likelihood of breakage. Similarly, protective coatings having
substantial thicknesses have been known for use on glass products.
These, however, have been applicable only to specialized
containers, for example, those employed in aerosol spray-type
applications. Increased costs, production inefficiencies in capably
coating ware in the quantities required, providing a coating of the
quality capable of restraining and retaining glass upon
fragmentation under pressure, and employment of such ware in
conventional filling and handling equipment have theretofore been
thought to make impossible the fruitful addition to the market of
composite glass, plastic-protected ware.
Specific problems presented and overcome by this invention have
been to provide the ware with a protective sheath or outer envelope
of a sufficient thickness and resiliency to adequately restrain and
retain the glass receptacle portion of a pressurized container
against fragmentation. To economically accomplish this end, the
volume of coating material must be minimized, yet the effective
thickness thereof must be maximized to render the needed
protection. Similarly, a consistantly uniform, proper and good
adhesion should be maintained between the glass receptacle portion
and sheath portion of the container to provide the proper
restraining effects. Additionally, in order for plastic coated ware
to be easily processed in conventional equipment, exterior surface
coefficients of friction must be minimized, yet that same surface
should effectively produce a high coefficient when the coated
container is hand held. Both of these diametrically opposed
propositions (i.e., minimum material yet maximum protection and low
yet high coefficients of friction) are satisfied by the novel
construction of this invention.
In accordance with this invention, a novel container capable of
internal pressurization is provided which has an inner glass
receptacle or envelope and a closely adhering outer sheath or
envelope which substantially covers the inner glass receptacle. The
exterior protective sheath comprises a shape-retaining, flexible
resin which is able to restrain and retain fragments of the glass
receptacle if the receptacle breaks.
The exterior sheath is further provided with a plurality of
outwardly protruding nodular means, nodal areas or nodes that
minimize the surface frictional characteristics between abuting
bottles and in mechanical handling, are shock absorbent, and due to
its stippled effect, provide maximum non-slip characteristics when
hand-held.
However, the nodal areas provide the noted increased shock
protection while employing a minimum of resin material. Such result
is obtained due to an increase in thickness at the nodular areas
which will bear the brunt of any physical abuse to which the
container is subjected. Similarly, substantial portions of the
coating are of a reduced thickness thus providing a material saving
and creating voids into which portions of the material forming the
nodes may flow upon impact. Thus, the effective thickness of the
resin sheath is that of the nodal areas and the necessity of
providing a uniform overall coating thickness which would employ
substantially more resin is avoided.
The nodes likewise reduce the area of contact exposed for example,
between container surface to surface contact or contact between
containers and equipment since, in general, only the nodular
surface areas will be in contact, thus, the frictional resistance
therebetween will be reduced. At the same time, the nodes
characteristicly provide a maximum non-slip effect when the
container is hand-held, since the flexible supple surface of the
human fingers conforms to the nodular or stippled, knurled-like
surface of the container and contacts both the surface of the nodes
and the surface of the depressions, effectively increasing the
contacted surface area in such instances.
To produce these desirable end results, it is preferred that the
exterior surface of the outer envelope or sheath deviate from the
mean sheath thickness by about between 8 and 20 percent. This, in
effect, further defines the respective dimensions of the nodular
protrusions and voids therebetween. The novel plastic or resin
covering or sheath also restrains and retains fragments of the
glass receptacle should such receptacle be broken even when the
container is pressurized to conditions approximating sixty pounds
per square inch. This effect is produced in accordance with the
invention, by providing the plastic covering or sheath of a
flexible, resilient resin which will stretch and expand rather than
itself fragment in the event of receptacle failure. Such expansion
of the covering before its own failure enables glass fragments to
be restrained until the pressure within the receptacle escapes
through initially formed, relatively small openings or fissures
which may appear in the covering or sheath as it fails or until the
pressure is otherwise relieved.
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a container of the preferred
embodiment;
FIG. 2 is a partial cross-sectional view of the container shown in
FIG. 1 along line A--A thereof which illustrates prior art
construction; and,
FIG. 3 is a partial cross-sectional view of the container shown in
FIG. 1 along line A--A thereof illustrating the invention.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, container 10 as shown
in FIGS. 1 and 3 comprises an inner glass receptacle or envelope 12
and an exterior outer sheath or envelope 14 comprised of a flexible
shape-retaining resin contiguously covering a majority of the
exterior surface 16 of receptacle 12. Sheath 14 is provided on its
outer exposed surface 18 with a plurality of preferably randomly
positioned outwardly extending shock absorbing nodes 20. These
nodes are separated by depressions 22 which are believed to permit
maximum deflection and expansion of nodes 20 in a direction
parallel to surface 16 upon receipt of excessive impacts.
Accordingly, this maximized deflection is believed to increase the
shock absorbing characteristics of sheath 14 and in addition,
reduces the amount of material needed for an effective shock
absorbing sheath 14, thus reducing the cost of manufacturing
container 10.
In the preferred embodiment, inner glass receptacle or envelope 12
has a wall thickness (Gx) of from about 0.03 to about 0.12 inches
and the outer envelope 14 has a thickness of from about 0.004 to
about 0.018 inches. This outer envelope preferably also is formed
so that specific dimensional qualities are maintained. For example,
it is considered ideal to provide a mean envelope thickness value
(Px) of about between 0.008 and 0.012 inches. Similarly, it is
preferred that the nodes and voids have a mean deviation above and
below this base value on the order of 12 to 18 percent and
approximately 8 to 12 percent respectively. In other terms, it is
found that the preferred maximum nodular elevation above the mean
thickness value varies between 6 and 60 percent and that maximum
deflection of the voids below the mean thickness value varies
between about 20 and 40 percent.
PREFERRED SHEATH OUTER SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS
______________________________________ Px Sheath Mean Thickness
(in.) Px1 Mean Deviation above Px (%) Px2 Mean Deviation below Px
(%) % Max. Elevation above Px % Max. Deflection below
______________________________________ Px 0.008 to 0.012 12 to 18 8
to 12 6 to 60 20 to 40 ______________________________________
It should be obvious that this surface configuration substantially
differentiates from that shown in FIG. 2 where the outer envelope
thickness (Pxo) is virtually uniform and accordingly is devoid of
surface deviations as are described. Thus, as is indicated above,
the coating thickness is not uniform throughout and the maximum
such thickness is created at the nodal areas 20; whereas in each
instance the thickness at depression 22 will be within the noted
range but less than at the nodes.
The material of construction of sheath 14 may be flexible and
resilient resin which will stretch and expand rather than crack or
fragment if inner receptacle 12 should break whether or not it is
under internal pressure. Thermosetting resins such as flexible
cross-linked urethane rubbers or others may be used; however,
thermoplastic resins are preferred since they can be formed into
coatings and films more easily and react in the manner above
described and as is important in carrying out the invention.
Thermoplastic polymers of butadiene, acrylates, ethylene,
propylene, styrene, vinyl, chloride, vinyl acetate, cellulose
acetate, cellulose butyrate and cellulose propionate may be used.
In addition, fluoroplastics, methyl pentenes, polyamides, phenoxy
resin, polycarbonates, polyamides, polyphenylene oxides and
polysulfone may be used.
The preferred plastics are inexpensive, have a relatively high tear
strength, have high impact resistance, easily form a contiguous
film or coating and are flexible. Of those above mentioned, the
preferred plastics are polyethylene,
acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymers and impact
polystyrene.
It is, of course, appreciated that a suitable means of application
of the coating material or sheath 14 to inner glass receptacle 12
is a necessity and as examples it is suggested that any of the
following may be employed depending upon the manufactures
desired:
a. By spraying the the thermoplastic material as a powder,
optionally by an electrostatic spraying method, onto the hot
external surface of the inner receptacle;
b. By dipping the inner receptacle, maintained at an appropriate
temperature, into a fluidized bed of the plastic material in powder
form;
c. By dipping the inner receptacle, if desired while hot, into a
molten both of the plastic material or into a solution or a
dispersion of such material, or
d. By any other method of providing a sleeve type coating to an
inner glass receptacle known in the art.
* * * * *