U.S. patent number 3,823,743 [Application Number 05/192,146] was granted by the patent office on 1974-07-16 for pressure reducing device.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Dunlap Holdings Limited. Invention is credited to Colin Forbes King.
United States Patent |
3,823,743 |
King |
* July 16, 1974 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
PRESSURE REDUCING DEVICE
Abstract
A pressure reducing device comprises an inlet for high pressure
gas, an outlet for low pressure gas and a path therebetween for
flow of gas from inlet to outlet, said path including at least one
porous baffle having an inner portion made of porous material
disposed in an inner zone of said path and an outer portion
comprising a fibrous medium disposed in an outer zone of said path,
the inner portion having a lower flow resistance than the outer
portion. The porous materials used for the inner portion of the
baffle include: layers of gauze, expanded metal, sintered metal,
ceramic foams and plastics foams such as rigidified foams. The
fibrous materials used for the outer portion of the baffle include;
spun mineral fibers, natural fibers and glass wool.
Inventors: |
King; Colin Forbes (Sutton
Coldfield, EN) |
Assignee: |
Dunlap Holdings Limited
(London, EN)
|
[*] Notice: |
The portion of the term of this patent
subsequent to July 18, 1989 has been disclaimed. |
Family
ID: |
10465559 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/192,146 |
Filed: |
October 26, 1971 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6, 1970 [GB] |
|
|
52847/70 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
138/42;
181/258 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F16L
55/04 (20130101); F16L 55/02745 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F16L
55/027 (20060101); F16L 55/04 (20060101); F16L
55/02 (20060101); F15d 001/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;138/42,40
;181/50,51,69,70,71 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Price; William I.
Assistant Examiner: Pollard; Steven M.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Stevens, Davis, Miller &
Mosher
Claims
Having now described my invention -- what I claim is:
1. A pressure reducing device comprising an inlet for high pressure
gas, an outlet for low pressure gas and a path therebetween for
flow of gas from inlet to outlet, said path including at least one
porous baffle having an inner portion made of porous material
disposed in an inner zone of said path and an outer portion
comprising a fibrous medium disposed in an outer zone of said path,
the inner portion having a lower flow resistance than the outer
portion.
2. A pressure reducing device according to claim 1 in which the
inner portion comprises a material selected from the group
consisting of layers of gauze, expanded metal, sintered metal,
ceramic foam and plastic foams.
3. A pressure reducing device according to claim 2 in which the
inner portion comprises reticular metal foam.
4. A pressure reducing device according to claim 3 in which the
reticular metal foam comprises metal deposited on a reticulated
organic foam.
5. A pressure reducing device according to claim 4 in which the
reticular metal foam comprises electrodeposited metal on
reticulated organic foam.
6. A pressure reducing device according to claim 1 in which the
porous material comprising the inner portion has a flow resistance
of less than 1 psi per inch thickness in a stream of gas moving at
a velocity within the range 5 to 80m/sec.
7. A pressure reducing device according to claim 1 in which the
inner portion is conical.
8. A pressure reducing device according to claim 1 in which the
inner portion is part spherical.
9. A pressure reducing device according to claim 1 in which the
fibrous medium in the outer portion is selected from the group
consisting of spun mineral fiber, natural fiber and glass
fiber.
10. A pressure reducing device according to claim 9 in which the
material of the outer portion has a flow resistance in excess of 50
times that of the inner portion when measured at the same air
velocity.
11. A pressure reducing device according to claim 9 in which the
material of the outer portion has a flow resistance in excess of
100 times that of the inner portion when measured at the same air
velocity.
12. A pressure reducing device according to claim 1 in which the
inner and outer portions are separated by a perforated sheet
baffle.
13. A pressure reducing device according to claim 12 in which the
perforated sheet baffle comprises a material selected from the
group consisting of metal, plastic material and woven fabric.
14. A pressure reducing device according to claim 12 in which the
perforated sheet baffle is covered with fine cloth.
15. A gas pressure reducing device, comprising:
an inlet for high pressure gas;
an outlet for low pressure gas, the area of said outlet being
larger than the area of said inlet;
a porous baffle between said inlet and said outlet, said baffle
comprising
an inner portion of porous material whose cross-sectional area
increases progressively along an axis in the direction from said
inlet to said outlet;
an outer portion comprising a fibrous medium radially surrounding
said inner portion; said inner portion having a lower gas flow
resistance than said outer portion.
Description
This invention relates to pressure reducing devices.
It is frequently necessary to reduce a high pressure stream of gas
to a low pressure stream. Such a requirement often occurs in high
pressure distribution of gases where the pressure is required to be
reduced before transmission to the point of use. Conventionally,
the reduction in pressure is achieved by passing the high pressure
gas through a duct having a relatively large cross-sectional area.
This procedure tends to create a high level of noise which can
present a serious problem, for example where large quantities of
gas are depressurised in urban areas.
According to the present invention a pressure reducing device
comprises an inlet for high pressure gas, an outlet for low
pressure gas and a path therebetween for flow of gas from inlet to
outlet, said path including at least one porous baffle having an
inner portion made of porous material disposed in an inner zone of
said path and an outer portion comprising a fibrous medium in an
outer zone of said path, the inner portion having a lower flow
resistance than the outer portion.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention the inner and outer
portions of the baffle are separated by a perforated sheet
material. This material may be metal, plastics, woven fabric or any
other suitable material. This layer of perforated sheet is used to
keep the fibrous medium in place, in order to assist with its
function the baffle may be covered with fine cloth, thereby
effectively reducing the size of the apartures without effecting
the impedance of the baffles.
In general, the inner portion of the porous baffle should be such
as to permit expansion of the gas while reducing to a minimum the
turbulence produced by the expansion. It is preferred that this
inner portion is either conical or part spherical in shape.
Porous materials that may be used for the inner portion of the
porous baffle of the present invention include: layers of gauze,
expanded metal, sintered metal, ceremic foams and plastics foams
such as rigidified foams. These materials should preferably have
porosities which give low flow resistance. The flow resistance of
the materials used should normally be less than 1 psi per inch
thickness when in a stream of gas moving at a velocity within the
range 5 to 80 m/sec.
In particular the inner portion of the porous baffle is made of a
three-dimensional network arranged so as to define a plurality of
cellular spaces which intercommunicate with one another, said
network being made substantially of metal.
The three-dimensional network is preferably produced by spraying,
dipping or electrodeposition of the metal on a porous material.
The porous material onto which the metal may be deposited may be in
the form of an agglomerate of fiber, such as a felted material or a
spong-like or foam material such as natural sponge or a synthetic
resinous foam. In general, polyurethane foams are preferred. The
porous material may remain in the metal or it may be removed, e.g.
by heating to melt or "ash-out" the material.
Where a high degree of porosity is required, the foam may be
reticulated foam, i.e., a foam in which the organic phase is a
three-dimesnional network with no substantial wall portions
defining the cells. Such reticulated foams may be produced by
removing the relatively thin cell walls from a foam, e.g., by
chemical means such as aqueous, sodium hydroxide in the case of
polyurethane foams.
When the metal is to be electrodeposited it is, of course,
necessary either to use a porous material which is electrically
conducting or to render the material conducting by means of a
conducting surface layer. Non-conductive materials may be made
self-conducting by means of an additive such as graphite or a
powdered metal. A conducting surface layer may be applied by
coating the material with a curable resinous material incorporating
a conductive additive or by chemically depositing a metal thereon,
e.g., by the reduction of ammonical silver nitrate in situ. In
general, where chemical deposition is employed the surface should
be treated with one or more sensitizing agents such as stannous
chloride followed by palladium chloride for silver.
Metals which can be electrodeposited include silver, copper, nickel
and iron. Alloy foams can be produced in some cases by direct
plating and in other cases two or more metals may be deposited
successively and the alloy formed by heating the resultant
structure. Steel foams can be produced by the incorporation of the
required amounts of carbon and/or nitrogen. The carbon may be
derived from organic material forming the basic foam or added to an
electroplating bath.
The resulting alloy foams can, of course, be heat-treated to give
desirable physical properties, such heat-treatments being
well-known in the art.
The fibrous medium used in the outer portion of the porous baffle
is preferably relatively dense compared with the inner portion and
may be any fibrous material that is usually used for sound
absorption. In particular spun mineral fiber i.e., asbestos wool or
"Stillite D 50" (Registered Trade Mark) natural fiber, i.e. cotton
wool or glass wool are found useful. These materials are preferably
packed so that they have a flow resistance in excess of 50 times
and more preferably in excess of 100 times that of the material of
the inner portion when measured at the same air velocity.
The baffles according to this invention may be housed in a tube of
suitable material positioned between the high pressure inlet and
the low pressure outlet, in which case the baffles may be sealed in
the tube to prevent gas from by-passing them.
The baffles may be used alone or in conjunction with an additional
mechanical reducing valve and/or with other types of baffle.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is hereinafter described
with reference to the accompanying drawing which shows a
diagrammatic cross-section.
The preferred embodiment shown in FIG. 1 comprises a cylindrical
inlet 10 and a coaxial cylindrical outlet 11 having a substantially
larger diameter than the inlet 10.
Disposed between the inlet 10 and the outlet 11 is a porous baffle
made up of independent inner and outer portions separated by a
sheet of 1/16 inch perforated steel 14 in the form of a cone.
The outer portion 12 of the baffle is packed with spun mineral
fiber which is available under the trade name "Stillite D 50." The
inner portion 13 is in the form of a male cone of 10 pore per inch
foam metal having a flow resistance of 0.5 psi per inch thickness
at an air velocity of 40 m/sec and is located in position by the
perforated sheet steel cone 14.
In order to ease construction of the foam metal cone it is
constructed from several sheets 16 which are held together by an
axial retaining bolt 15.
A pressure reducing device of the type described above was
constructed in which the inlet had an internal diameter of 2.5 cm
and the outlet an internal diameter of 12.7 cm. The overall length
of the baffle was 15.7 cm and the inner portion was in the form of
a 45.degree. cone made of 10 pore/inch foam metal.
The pressure reducing device was tested using spun mineral fiber
(Stillite D 50) and Analar grade glass wool in the outer portion of
the baffle, these materials were packed so that the outer portion
had a flow resistance of 100 psi per inch thickness at an air
velocity of 40 m/sec. The results from these tests are compared in
Table I with those for expansion of the gas without a silencer and
using only the inner portion of the baffle as a silencer.
TABLE I ______________________________________ Silencer Air
Velocity m/sec Sound Level dB Reduction in sound level dB Impedance
of Silencer ______________________________________ (lb/in.sup.2)
15.2 117 -- -- None 30.4 130 -- --
______________________________________ Foam Metal 15.2 81 36 2 and
Stillite D 50 30.4 81 49 * ______________________________________
Foam Metal 15.2 82 35 2 and Glass Wool 30.4 82 48 *
______________________________________ Foam Metal 15.2 94 23 2
alone 30.4 94 36 * ______________________________________ * Back
pressure with silencer less than without silencer (i.e. negative
impedance).
As can be seen from the results the pressure reducing devices of
the present invention give substantial reductions in noise levels
over the unsilenced case.
At the higher velocity 30.4 m/sec. with the unsilenced pipe, air
passing through the inlet reached the speed of sound. This caused
shock waves to be set up downstream of the inlet creating high
impedance to flow. This does not take place with the silencer in
place so more gas can be forced through allowing a higher flow rate
to be reached for a particular low pressure.
* * * * *