U.S. patent number 3,819,522 [Application Number 05/291,681] was granted by the patent office on 1974-06-25 for anti-fogging window cleaner surfactant mixture.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Colgate-Palmolive Company. Invention is credited to Raymond S. Brown, Barney J. Zmoda.
United States Patent |
3,819,522 |
Zmoda , et al. |
June 25, 1974 |
ANTI-FOGGING WINDOW CLEANER SURFACTANT MIXTURE
Abstract
An anti-fogging surfactant mixture for use in a window cleaning
composition consisting essentially of a mixture of a nonionic
surface active agent having the formula ##SPC1## Wherein R is an
alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms and R.sub.1 is a
radical selected from the group consisting of methyl, ethyl,
cyclopropyl, and phenyl or the reaction product of the above glycol
and from 2 to 200 moles of ethylene oxide and an anionic or
nonionic surfactant in a weight ratio of 1:50 to 1:1. A non-fogging
window cleaner containing from 0.1 to 3 percent of the above noted
anti-fogging surfactant mixture as well as a method for utilizing
the same is provided.
Inventors: |
Zmoda; Barney J. (Bridgewater,
NJ), Brown; Raymond S. (Iselin, NJ) |
Assignee: |
Colgate-Palmolive Company (New
York, NY)
|
Family
ID: |
23121365 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/291,681 |
Filed: |
September 25, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
510/182; 510/400;
510/537; 510/497; 510/506; 510/535; 510/536; 510/505; 106/13 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C11D
1/72 (20130101); C11D 3/164 (20130101); C11D
1/29 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C11D
3/16 (20060101); C11D 1/02 (20060101); C11D
1/72 (20060101); C11D 1/29 (20060101); C11d
001/72 () |
Field of
Search: |
;252/89 ;106/13
;260/635Y |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Schultz; William E.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sylvester; Herbert S. Grill; Murray
M. Blumenkopf; Norman
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An anti-fogging mixture for use in a window cleaning composition
consisting essentially of a mixture of a glycolic surface active
agent selected from acetylenic glycols having the formula
##SPC7##
where R is an alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms and
R.sub.1 is a radical selected from the group consisting of methyl,
ethyl, cyclopropyl and phenyl, or the reaction product of an
acetylenic glycol having the formula ##SPC8##
wherein R is an alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms
and R.sub.1 is a radical selected from the group consisting of
methyl, ethyl, cyclopropyl and phenyl, and from 2 to 200 moles of
ethylene oxide, and a surface active agent selected from anionic
surface active agents having the formula R.sub.2 O(C.sub.2 H.sub.4
O).sub. n SO.sub.3 M wherein R.sub.2 is an alkyl group having from
8 to 20 carbon atoms, n is a number from 2 to 200 and M is a cation
selected from the group consisting of ammonium, sodium, and
potassium and nonionic surface agent having the formula R.sub.2
O(C.sub.2 H.sub.4 O).sub. n H wherein R.sub.2 and n are as defined
in a weight ratio of glycolic to anionic or nonionic surface active
agent from 1:50 to 1:1.
2. The composition of claim 1 wherein said anionic surface active
agent is selected from the group consisting of mixed C.sub.12-15
normal primary alkyl triethenoxy sulfate, ammonium salt; myristyl
triethenoxy sulfate, potassium salt, n-decyl diethenoxy sulfate,
sodim salt; lauryl diethenoxy sulfate, ammonium salt, palmityl
tetraethenoxy sulfate, sodium salt; mixed C.sub.12-15 normal
primary alkyl mixed tri- and tetraethenoxy sulfate, sodium salt,
stearyl pentaethenoxy sulfate, ammonium salt and mixed C.sub.10-18
normal primary alkyl triethenoxy sulfate, potassium salt.
3. The composition of claim 1 wherein said glycolic surface active
agent is selected from the group consisting of
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol
2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol
3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol
2,5-diphenyl-3hexyne-2,5-diol
2,5-dimethyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol
5,8-dimethyl-6-dodecyne-5,8-diol
2. 4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 3.5EO
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 200EO
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 10EO
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 9EO
2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 20EO
3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 30EO
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 15EO
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 20EO
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 2EO
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 100EO
2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 50EO
3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 20EO
2,5-diphenyl-3-hexyne-2,5diol + 30EO
2,5-dimethyl-3-hexyne-2,5diol + 10EO
5,8-dimethyl-6-dodecyne-5,8-diol, etc. + 5EO
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 20EO
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 8EO
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 12EO
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 15EO
2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 10EO
3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 50EO
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 30EO
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 10EO
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 5EO
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 2EO
2,5-diphenyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 5EO
2,5-dimethyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 20EO
5,8-dimethyl-6-dodecyne-5,5-diol + 10EO, etc.
4. The composition of claim 1 wherein said glycolic surface active
agent is a mixture of a major amount of
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethylene glycol and as a
minor amount of alkyl phenyl ethylene oxide adduct.
5. The composition of claim 1 wherein in said anionic surfactant
R.sub.2 is mixed alkyl, said alkly containing from 12 to 15 carbon
atoms and wherein from about 10 to 50 percent of each alkyl chain
length is present.
6. The composition according to claim 5 wherein said anionic
surface active agent is C.sub.12-15 normal primary alkyl
triethanoxy sulfate ammonium salt.
7. The composition of claim 1 wherein M is an ammonium ion.
8. The composition of claim 1 wherein said glycolic surface active
agent is an acetylenic glycol having the formula ##SPC9##
wherein R is an alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms,
and R.sub.1 is a radical selected from the group consisting of
methyl, ethyl, cyclopropyl and phenyl.
9. The composition of claim 4 wherein said glycolic surface active
agent is 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol.
10. The composition of claim 1 wherein said weight ratio of said
glycolic surface active agent to said surface active agent is 1:20
to 1:4.
11. The composition of claim 1 wherein said weight ratio of said
glycolic surface active agent to said surface active agent is 1:20
to 1:10.
12. A window cleaning composition comprising from 80 to 93.7
percent water, from 3 to 8 percent by weight of at least one glycol
ether selected from the group consisting of monoalkyl ethers of
ethylene glycol and propylene glycol from 3 to 7 percent by weight
of a lower monohydric alcohol, from 0.1 to 2 percent by weight of
an alkali or ammonium hydroxide and from 0.1 to 3 percent by weight
of an anti-fogging mixture consisting essentially of a mixture of a
glycolic surface active agent selected from acetylenic glycols
having the formula ##SPC10##
wherein R is an alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms,
and R.sub.1 is a radical selected from the group consisting of
methyl, ethyl, cyclopropyl and phenyl, or the reaction product of
an acetylenic glycol having the formula ##SPC11##
wherein R is an alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms
and R.sub.1 is a radical selected from the group consisting of
methyl, ethyl, cyclopropyl and phenyl, and from 2 to 200 moles of
ethylene oxide, and a surface active agent selected from anionic
surface active agents having the formula R.sub.2 O(C.sub.2 H.sub.4
O).sub.n SO.sub.3 M wherein R.sub.2 is an alkyl group having from 8
to 20 carbon atoms, n is a number from 2 to 200 and M is a cation
selected from the group consisting of ammonium, sodium and
potassium and nonionic surface active agent having the formula
R.sub.2 O(C.sub.2 H.sub.4 O).sub.n H wherein R.sub.2 and n are as
defined in a weight ratio of glycolic to anionic or nonionic
surface active agent of from 1:50 to 1:1.
13. The composition of claim 12 wherein the glycol ether is a
mixture of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether and propylene glycol
monomethyl ether.
14. The composition of claim 12 wherein said lower monohydric
alcohol is isopropanol.
15. The composition of claim 12 having a pH between 8 and 11.
16. The composition of claim 12 werein M is an ammonium ion.
17. The composition of claim 12 wherein said glycolic surface
active agent is an acetylenic glycol having the formula
##SPC12##
wherein R is an alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms
and R.sub.1 is a radical selected from the group consisting of
methyl, ethyl, cyclopropyl and phenyl.
18. The composition of claim 17 wherein said glycolic surface
active agent is 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol.
19. The combination of claim 12 wherein said weight ration of said
glycolic surface active agent to said surface active agent is 1:20
to 1:4.
20. The composition of claim 12 wherein said weight ratio of said
glycolic surface active agent to said surface active agent is 1:20
to 1:10.
Description
This invention relates to a non-fogging window cleaning
composition. More particularly, this invention relates to a
synergistic non-fogging surfactant mixture for use in a window
cleaning composition.
The formation of fog on glass surfaces with its resultant loss of
visibility is a problem which has troubled home owners, drivers,
pilots or virtually anyone who depends upon clear visibility
through a window or similar glass article. The attention which has
been paid to this problem is evidenced by the remarkable number of
glass cleaning compositions which are on the market claiming
anti-fogging or defogging characteristics.
Window or mirror fogging is caused at least in part by the
condensation of moisture droplets onto the transparent surface.
These individual condensed droplets form a whitish fog which
renders the glass or mirror opaque and obstructs vision. It has
been known to utilize the various surface active agents to reduce
the surface tension and thereby enhance the coalescence of these
individual water droplets into a larger, more transparent form.
Howver, these prior art compositions, although they possess
adequate defogging characteristics, possess a series of other
undesirable properties, such as high initial film formation, heavy
image distortion, streaking, smearing, and smudging of the surface.
Obviously, a preferred window cleaner and antifogging composition
would possess superior, or at least quite satisfactory, results in
each of the above categories as well as possessing adequate
anti-fogging properties.
It is within the above embodiment that the anti-fogging surfactant
mixture for window cleaning compositions and window cleaning
compositions of the present invention were developed. Briefly, such
mixture comprises a mixture of a nonionic surface active agent
having the formula ##SPC2##
Wherein R is an alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms
and R.sub.1 is a radical selected from the group consisting
essentially of methyl, ethyl, cyclopropyl, and phenyl or the
reaction product of the above glycol and from 2 to 200 moles of
ethylene oxide and an anionic surface active agent in a weight
ratio of 1:50 to 1:1. The window cleaning composition of the
present invention comprises from 0.2 to 3 percent by weight of the
above synergistic anti-fogging surfactant mixture, from 80 to 93.7
percent water, from 3 to 8 percent by weight of at least one glycol
ether, from 3 to 7 percent by weight of a monohydric alcohol and
from 0.1 to 2 percent by weight of a hydroxide selected from
sodium, potassium and ammonium hydroxide.
It is, therefore, the primary object of the present invention to
provide an anti-fogging window cleaner with improved
properties.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a
synergistic anti-fogging surfactant mixture which is effective when
used in a small amount in a window cleaning composition.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide an
anti-fogging window cleaning composition which minimizes film
formation, sight distortion, smearing, smudging, and streaking.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a
synergistic anti-fogging surfactant mixture comprising a mixture of
a nonionic acetylenic glycol and an anionic sulfate.
Still further objects and advantages of the mixture and window
cleaning composition of the present invention will become more
apparent from the following, more detailed description thereof.
The foregoing objects and advantages of the present invention are
achieved through the anti-fogging surfactant mixture of the present
invention which is for use with a window cleaning composition
consists essentially of a mixture of a nonionic surface active
agent having the formula ##SPC3##
wherein R is an alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms
and R.sub.1 is a radical selected from the group consisting
essentially of methyl, ethyl, cyclopropyl and phenyl or the
reaction product of the above glycol and from 2 to 200 moles of
ethylene oxide and an anionic or nonionic surface active agent,
especially an anionic surface active agent having the formula
R.sub.2 O(C.sub.2 H.sub.4 O.sub.n)SO.sub.3 M wherein R.sub.2 is an
alkyl group having from 8 to 20 carbon atoms, n is a number from 2
to 200 and M is a cation selected from the group consisting of
sodium, potassium and ammonium or a nonionic surface active agent
having the formula R.sub.2 O(C.sub.2 H.sub.4 O).sub.n H wherein
R.sub.2 and n are defined as above in a weight ratio of 1:50 to
1:1, preferably 1:20 to 1:4 and most preferably 1:20 to 1:10.
The anti-fogging window cleaning composition of the present
invention comprises from 0.2 to 3 percent and preferably from 0.3
to 0.5 percent by weight of the above noted synergistic mixture,
from 80 to 93.7 percent water, from 3 to 8 percent by weight glycol
ether, from 3 to 7 percent lower monohydric alcohol and from 0.1 to
2 percent of an alkali hydroxide selected from sodium, potassium
and ammonium hydroxides.
The acetylenic glycols which comprise one component of the
anti-fogging surfactant mixture of the present invention have the
following structural formula ##SPC4##
wherein R is an alkyl group, either a branched or a straight chain
group containing from one to four carbon atoms, such as methyl,
ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl or t-butyl and wherein
R.sub.1 is a radical selected from the group of methyl, ethyl,
cyclopropyl and phenyl. Representative compounds of the above noted
acetylenic glycols include the following
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol
2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol
3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol
2,5-diphenyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol
2,5-dimethyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol
5,8-dimethyl-6-dodecyne-5,8-diol, etc.
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol is most preferred for use in
the synergistic anti-fogging mixture and window cleaner of the
present invention.
These symmetrical tertiary acetylenic glycols may be prepared by a
number of well known techniques, such as by reacting calcium
carbide, an alkali metal hydroxide and the corresponding ketone to
give the desired glycol as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,250,445, or
by reacting the ketones with an alkali metal acetylide as disclosed
in U.S. Pat. No. 2,106,180, or, lastly, by reacting acetylene with
an excess of the ketone in the presence of a solid caustic potash
in a solvent medium.
Although the above noted acetylenic glycols have been utilized as
non-foaming surface active agents for a great variety of uses, such
as dentifrices, toilet soaps, shampoos, laundry detergents, pigment
dispersants in water based paints, viscosity reducers, gel
inhibitors and freeze-thaw additives, these materials have not been
utilized as a component in an anti-fogging composition. This is, of
course, due to the fact that the acetylenic glycols themselves
without the anionic sulfate do not possess any significant
anti-fogging properties and any anti-fogging activity is
accompanied by heavy image distortion, streaking, smearing or
initial film formation. Accordingly, these materials had been
thought to be completely unsuited for utilization in a window
cleaning composition in any percentage and, especially unsuited for
use in an anti-fogging window cleaning composition.
The reaction products of the above noted acetylenic glycols and
ethylene oxide may also be utilized in the anti-fogging window
cleaning composition of the present invention. More particularly,
this reaction product comprises the reaction product of one mole of
the acetylenic glycol having the formula ##SPC5##
wherein R and R.sub.1 are defined as above and from 2 to 200 moles
of ethylene oxide. Although any amount of ethylene oxide within the
above noted range may be utilized for producing the reaction
product utilized in the mixture of the present invention, it is
preferred to react the acetylenic glycols with from 2 to 20 moles
of ethylene oxide. Representative ethoxylated acetylenic glycols
include the following wherein the amount of ethylene oxide reacted
with the acetylenic glycol is indicated as +NEO wherein N is the
number of moles reacted:
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 3.5EO
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 200EO
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 10EO
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 9EO
2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 20EO
3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 30EO
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 15EO
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 20EO
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 2EO
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 100EO
2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 50EO
3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 20EO
2,5-diphenyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 30EO
2,5-dimethyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 10EO
5,8-dimethyl-6-dodecyne-5,8-diol, etc. + 5EO
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 20EO
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 8EO
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 12EO
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 15EO
2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 10EO
3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 50EO
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 30EO
4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 10EO
2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 5EO
3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 2EO
2,5-diphenyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 5EO
2,5-dimethyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 20EO
5,8-dimethyl-6-dodecyne-5,8-diol + 10EO, etc.
Any of the above noted reaction products between ethylene oxide and
the acetylenic glycols may be utilized, although it is preferred to
utilize the reaction products of ethylene oxide and
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol.
It is important to utilize the glycolic surface active agents and
the nonionic and anionic surfactants within the ratio specified
since outside the broad weight ratio, i.e. 1:50 to 1:1 glycolic
surfactant to added surface active agent, i.e. anionics or
nonionics, the anti-fogging properties appreciably disappear. And
within the preferred ratio i.e. 1:20 to 1:4 glycolic surfactant to
added surfactant and especially within the most preferred range
i.e. 1:20 to 1:10, the anti-fog properties are maximized with a
concomitent decrease in adverse films, etc.
The second component of the anti-fogging mixture is an anionic or
nonionic surfactant or mixtures thereof.
A preferred class of anionic surfactants suitable for use in the
synergistic mixture of the present invention has the formula
RO(C.sub.2 H.sub.4 O).sub.n SO.sub.3 M wherein R is a fatty alkyl
having from eight to 20 carbon atoms, n is a number from 2 to 200
and M is a cation selected from ammonium, potassium and sodium
ions. Although any of the higher fatty acid ethoxylated sulfates
may be utilized, it is preferred to utilize a sulfate wherein R is
a fatty alkyl from between 10 and 18 carbon atoms, n is a number
between two and 20 and M is ammonium. The most preferred sulfated
anionic utilized in the anti-fogging window cleaner of the present
invention is a mixed C.sub.12-15 normal primary alkyl triethanoxy
sulfate ammonium salt. This most preferred anionic sulfate salt
produces the optimum results in combination with the above noted
acetylenic glycol.
The anionic detergents generally have the fatty alkyl group
terminally joined to the polyoxyethylene chain which is of
necessity terminally joined to the sulfur of the sulfate group.
Although a slight degree of a branching of the higher alkyl group
may be tolerated, the detergency of the anionic sulfate is improved
if the alkyl group is essentially straight chained. Furthermore,
medial joinder of the alkyl to the ethanoxy chain should be
minimized although a small percentage up to about 10 percent of
medial joinder near one end of the alkyl chain is acceptable. As
noted above, the preferred range of the alkyl is from 10 to 18
carbon atoms and within this range, the mixed alkyls having 12 to
15 carbon atoms are most preferred, these mixtures containing
approximately between 10 and 50 percent of each chain length.
The ethylene oxide content of the anionic detergent is such that n
is from 2 to 200 and preferably from 2 to 20 with the most
preferred ethylene oxide content being about 3, especially when R
is a mixed 12 - 15 carbon atom alkyl mixture. The value of n or the
ethylene oxide content is determined by the desired
hydrophobic-hydrophylic balance which may be varied markedly by
variations in the ethylene oxide content and the length of the
alkyl groups.
The salt forming cation may be any suitable solubilizing metal;
however, the alkali metals, i.e. sodium and potassium and ammonium
ions are preferred with the ammonium ion being most preferred.
Examples of the higher alcohol polyethenoxy sulfates which may be
used as the anionic sulfate in the anti-fogging mixture of the
present invention include: mixed C.sub.12-15 normal primary alkyl
triethenoxy sulfate, ammonium salt; myristyl triethenoxy sulfate,
potassium salt; n-decyl diethenoxy sulfate, sodium salt; lauryl
diethenoxy sulfate, ammonium salt, palmityl tetraethenoxy sulfate,
sodium salt; mixed C.sub.12-15 normal primary alkyl mixed tri- and
tetraethenoxy sulfate, sodium salt; stearyl pentaethenoxy sulfate,
ammonium salt and mixed C.sub.10-18 normal primary alkyl
triethenoxy sulfate, potassium salt.
In addition to the above noted anionic detergents, nonionic
detergents having the following formula may also be utilized in
conjunction with the acetylenic glycols or ethoxylated acetylenic
glycols in the surfactant composition of the present invention:
R.sub.2 O(C.sub.2 H.sub.4 O.sub.n)H
wherein R.sub.2 and n are as defined above.
The configuration of the nonionic detergent should be roughly
similar to those described with regard to the anionic detergents,
i.e. the nonionic detergents could be formed primarily from
straight chained fatty alcohols with the alcohol groups being
terminally joined to the alkyl radical. Generally, it is preferred
to utilize nonionic compounds wherein the alkyl group has from
between eight and 20 carbon atoms with the preferred nonionics
having from between 11 to 16 carbon atoms. Furthermore, with regard
to moles of ethylene oxides or length of the ethenoxy chain is
generally preferred that from 2 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide be
utilized. Furthermore, since these materials are generally formed
from mixed alkyl alcohols, the carbon atom chain length would
generally be an average chain length with a most preferred nonionic
being the reaction product of ethylene oxide with an alkyl alcohol
having from 11 to 15 carbon atoms.
Examples of other suitable non-ionic detergents include alkaryl
polyglycol detergents such as alkyl-phenol-ethylene oxide
condensates (2-200 moles ethylene oxide), such as p-isooctyl phenol
polyethylene oxide (10 ethylene oxide units); polyglycerol
monolaurate, glycol dioleate, sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan
monostearate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan
sesquioleate, the condensation products of ethylene oxide with
sorbitan esters of long chain fatty acids (Tweens), alkylolamides,
amine oxides, phosphine oxides, etc.
The anti-fogging window cleaner of the present invention in
addition to the acetylenic glycol and anionic sulfates includes
from 80 to 93.7 percent by weight of water, from 3 to 8 percent by
weight of at least one glycol ether, from 3 to 7 percent by weight
of an alcohol, from 0.1 to 2 percent of ammonium, hydroxide or an
alkaline metal hydroxide and from 0.1 to 3 percent by weight of the
mixture of anionic or nonionic surfactant and acetylenic
glycol.
The glycol ethers which are suitable for use in the window cleaning
composition of the present invention are employed primarily for
their solvent and additional detersive properties and include
monoethers of ethylene glycols, such as the monomethyl, the
monoethyl, the monopropyl and the monobutyl ethers of ethylene
glycol and the monoethers of propylene glycol, such as the
monomethyl, the monoethyl, the monopropyl and the monobutyl ethers
of propylene glycol.
The alcohol utilized is generally a lower alkyl monohydric alcohol,
such as methyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol and butyl
alcohol. If ethyl alcohol is utilized, generally such material is
utilized as denatured ethyl alcohol.
The hydroxides are utilized in the window cleaning composition so
as to control the pH level of the resultant composition and,
generally, the hydroxide corresponding to the anionic sulfate salt
is utilized. Generally, the pH of the window cleaning compositions
of the present invention is between 8 and 11 with the preferred pH
being 10.
In addition to the above noted ingredients, small amounts of color,
perfume and other agents, such as propellants for aerosol
dispensing, may be included.
The window cleaning composition of the present invention may be
packaged either for dispensing in an aerosol dispenser or utilizing
a mechanical pump type valve dispenser. When an aerosol dipensing
package is utilized, generally, the composition includes up to
about 10 percent by weight of a suitable propellant, such as any of
the well known fluorochloroethanes and similar materials; and the
hydrocarbon propellants, such as isobutane, etc .
The mixture and window cleaning composition of the present
invention will now be further illustrated by way of the following
examples wherein all parts and percentages are by weight and all
temperatures are in degrees centigrade.
EXAMPLE 1
A window cleaner having the following composition is prepared:
91.015% Water, demineralized 2.000 Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether
2.500 Propylene glycol monomethyl ether 3.800 Isopropyl alcohol
0.350 C12-15 alcohol (3 EO) ammonium sulfate 0.035 TG(A
commercially available mixture containing 83% 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-
5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethylene glycol and an alkyl phenyl-ethylene
oxide adduct 0.300 26.degree. Be Ammonium Hydroxide 100.000%
The cleaning performance of the above the above noted composition
is determined by the ability of this composition to flush off from
a pane of glass a film of mixed kitchen fats. The anti-fogging
properties of the above noted composition is evaluated by applying
the composition to a pane of glass followed by chilling the glass
pane and exposing the same to steam. The anti-fog efficacy is
judged by observing whether or not the composition's sudsing is
proper upon application, the absence of filming on application, the
prevention of fogging when exposed to steam, the clarity of sight
through the glass following steaming, the absence of film after
steaming and drying, and the freedom from smearing when dry.
When judged according to the above noted criteria, the composition
has excellent cleaning properties, has adequate sudsing upon
application with a slight film formed immediately. The anti-fogging
properties upon exposure to steam are judged as very good with good
clarity of sight and an absence of film after steaming and
virtually no smearing when dry.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1-8 and EXAMPLES 2-4
Three commercially available window cleaners plus the window
cleaning composition of Example 1 wherein the surfactants are
replaced with the surfactants, as shown in Table I with a
corresponding reduction or increase in the amount of water present,
are applied to a glass surface. These glass surfaces are then
exposed to steam and the anti-fog and cleaning properties are
noted.
TABLE I
__________________________________________________________________________
Example No. Cleaner Characteristics
__________________________________________________________________________
Comp. Ex. 1 Com. Product W Glass fogged on first exposure to steam.
Comp. Ex. 2 Com. Product EO Poor anti-fog first exposure, very poor
on second. Comp. Ex. 3 Com. Product A Glass fogged on first
exposure. Comp. Ex. 4 0.6% AAS.sup.1 Fair anti-fog effect,
distorted sight. Comp. Ex. 5 1.0% AAS Excessive sudsing. Good
anti-fog. Moderate sight distortion. Comp. Ex. 6 1.2% AAS Excessive
sudsing. Good anti-fog. Good sight. Moderate filming, smearing.
Comp. Ex. 7 1.4% AAS Excessive sudsing. Good anti-fog. Good sight.
Heavy filming, smearing. Comp. Ex. 8 0.05% TG.sup.2 No anti-fog
effect. Example 2 0.010% TG Fair anti-fog effect. Moderate 0.250%
AAS sight distortion. Example 3 0.025% TG Good anti-fog effect.
Good sight. 0.250% AAS No filming, no smearing. Example 4 0.010%
2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol 0.250% AAS Good anti-fog
effect. Good sight. No filming, no smearing.
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.1 C12-15 alcohol (3EO) Ammonium Sulfate. .sup.2 Same as in
Example 1
Each of the above noted window cleaning compositions performs
adequately in the cleaning test, i.e. the ability to flush off a
film of mixed kitchen fats; however, as shown in Table I, only
those window cleaners of Examples 2-4 which contain the novel
synergistic mixture of the present invention provide adequate
anti-fog characteristics with minimal distortion, filming and
smearing. The anionic sulfate surfactant used by itself produces
fair to good anti-fog effect; however, the distortion, smearing,
filming and sudsing characteristics are not acceptable. The
acetylenic diol when used by itself produces absolutely no
anti-fogging effect whatsoever.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 9-16 and Examples 5-10
The formulation of Example I is varied utilizing the following
surfactants in place of the TG and anionic sulfate with a
concomitant change in the water content of the formulation.
##SPC6##
As is apparent with reference to Table II only by the use of the
acetylenic glycol and the anionic sulfate are the results regarding
film formation, anti-fog, image distortion, streaking and smearing
acceptable. When either the acetylenic glycol or the anionic
sulfate is utilized singly poor anti-fogging characteristics are
observed or if acceptable anti-fogging characteristics are
obtained, other undesirable properties, such as heavy initial film,
streaking or smearing, are encountered. Regarding the commercial
products B and C which are included for their comparative value, it
is noted that the anti-fogging characteristics of these materials
are judged fair to good and that these materials are inferior
regarding initial film formation, image distortion, streaking and
smearing when compared to the products of the present
invention.
EXAMPLE 11
A window cleaner, having the following formulation, is
prepared:
Part 1- Liquid Base 90.958 Softened Water (deionized or Seolite)
2.000 Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether 2,500 Propylene Glycol
Monomethyl Ether 3,800 Isopropyl Alcohol, Anhydrous 0.417 C12-15
Alcohol EO 3:1 NH.sub.4 Sulfate, (60.0% AAS; 14.0% Ethanol; 63.0%
Solids) 0.025 Surfactant TG Mixture of Example 1 .+-.0.300
26.degree. Be Ammonium Hydroxide (Vary as required to adjust pH to
10.0 .+-. 0.5) 100.000 TOTAL MATERIALS
The above noted formulation is packaged utilizing an aerosol
container wherein 98.2 parts by weight of the above noted liquid
base is mixed with 1.8 parts by weight of isobutane propellant.
A window cleaner composition identical to the liquid base for use
in the aerosol container is also packaged in a mechanical spray
dispenser and the cleaning and anti-fogging effects of each are
compared on panes of glass. Each of the above noted window cleaning
compositions performs adequately with regard to the removal of the
mixed kitchen fats which have been previously streaked upon the
glass panes; and, further, when these glass panes are subjected to
steam, the anti-fogging properties are rated as good with virtually
no image distortion, initial film formation, streaking or
smearing.
EXAMPLE 12
The formulation of Example 1 is utilized except that the surfactant
TG mixture is replaced with a similar amount of the following
acetylenic glycols:
A. 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol;
B. 4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol;
C. 2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol;
D. 3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol;
E. 2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol;
F. 3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol;
G. 2,5-diphenyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol;
H. 2,5-dimethyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol; and
I. 5,8-dimethyl-6-dodecyne-5,8-diol.
Each of the above noted acetylenic glycols has adequate
anti-fogging properties, however, the A and F acetylenic glycols
produces slightly better results with regard to initial film
formation and smearing.
EXAMPLE 13
The formulation of Example 1 is again utilized with the exception
that the anionic sulfate is replaced with an equivalent amount of
the following anionic sulfates:
A. mixed C.sub.12-15 normal primary alkyl triethenoxy sulfate,
sodium salt;
B. myristyl triethenoxy sulfate, potassium salt;
C. n-decyl diethenoxy sulfate, sodium salt;
D. lauryl diethenoxy sulfate, ammonium salt;
E. palmityl tetraethenoxy sulfate, sodium salt;
F. mixed C.sub.14-15 normal primary alkyl mixed tri- and
tetraethenoxy sulfate, sodium salt;
G. stearyl pentaethenoxy sulfate, ammonium salt; and
H. mixed C.sub.10-18 normal primary alkyl triethenoxy sulfate,
potassium salt.
Each of the above noted formulations has satisfactory anti-fogging
properties; however, the anti-fogging properties of D and G are
slightly better than the anionic sulfates utilizing potassium and
sodium cations. This appears to be caused by the lower residue of
the ammonium sulfates as compared to the sodium and potassium
salts.
EXAMPLE 14
The formulation of Example 1 is utilized with the exception that
the anionic sulfate and the acetylenic glycol are replaced with the
following mixtures of acetylenic glycols and anionic sulfates (The
glycols are taken from Example 12 and the anionic sulfates are
taken from Example 13) with a corresponding increase or decrease in
the amount of water present, all other components remaining
stable.
A. 0.01 ex. 12(A), 0.19 Ex. 13 (D);
B. 0.06 ex. 12(C), 2.94 Ex. 13(A);
C. 0.75 ex. 12(B), 2,25 Ex. 13(G);
D. 0.05 ex. 12(D), 0.15 Ex. 13(B);
E. 0.02 ex. 12(F), 0.48 Ex. 13(C);
F. 0.03 ex. 12(H), 0.97 Ex. 13(H); and
G. 0.10 ex. 12(E), 1.00 Ex. 13(E).
Each of the above noted formulations has satisfactory anti-fogging
properties and performs adequately as regards to cleansing
ability.
EXAMPLE 15
The composition of Example 1 is utilized except for that the
surfactant TG mixture is replaced with a similar amount of the
following ethoxylated acetylenic glycols;
A. 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 3.5EO
B. 4,7-dimethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol + 30EO
C. 2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 200EO
D. 3,6-diethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 10 EO
E. 2,5-dicyclopropyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 20EO
F. 3,6-dimethyl-4-octyne-3,6-diol + 5EO
G. 2,5-diphenyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 15EO
H. 2,5-dimethyl-3-hexyne-2,5-diol + 2EO
I. 5,8; -dimethyl-6-dodecyne-5,8-diol + 7EO
Each of the above noted formulations performs adequately with
regard to both cleaning and anti-fogging properties.
EXAMPLE 16
The formulation of Example 1 is again utilized except that the
anionic sulfate is replaced with an equivalent amount of the
following nonionic surfactants:
A. p-isooctyl phenol polyethylene oxide (10 ethylene oxide
units);
B. dodecyl alcohol-polyethylene oxides (6 ethylene oxide units)
C. mixed C12-15 alcohol polyethylene oxide (10 ethylene
oxides);
D. sorbitan monolaurate;
E. mixed 11-15 alcohol polyethylene oxide having 11 ethylene oxide
units.
Each of the above noted compositions performs adequately with
regard both to cleaning properties and anti-fogging, streaking, and
smearing properties. However, when a composition similar to the
above noted composition with the exception of the deletion of the
acetylenic glycol component is utilized, the anti-fogging
properties are markedly reduced.
While the window cleaning composition and anti-fogging mixture of
the present invention and process for utilizing the same have been
described with reference to the foregoing specific examples, the
same are for the purposes of illustration only and are to be in no
way as construed as limiting the present invention which is
properly defined by way of the following appended claims.
* * * * *