U.S. patent number 3,814,141 [Application Number 05/339,383] was granted by the patent office on 1974-06-04 for method of weaving on water jet loom.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Teijin Limited. Invention is credited to Seiki Iribe, Tukasa Kobayashi, Norihisa Yamaguchi.
United States Patent |
3,814,141 |
Iribe , et al. |
June 4, 1974 |
METHOD OF WEAVING ON WATER JET LOOM
Abstract
A method for weaving a warp and a weft on a water jet loom,
wherein a desized interlaced yarn with the individual constituent
filaments being randomly twisted and interlaced is used as the warp
and an ordinary non-interlaced yarn is used as the weft, and the
weaving is carried out while maintaining the coefficient of static
friction of the warp against the weft in the wet state at not more
than 0.6, and the water-insolubility of the warp and the weft at 30
to 90 percent.
Inventors: |
Iribe; Seiki (Mihara,
JA), Yamaguchi; Norihisa (Mihara, JA),
Kobayashi; Tukasa (Mihara, JA) |
Assignee: |
Teijin Limited (Osaka,
JA)
|
Family
ID: |
12163931 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/339,383 |
Filed: |
March 7, 1973 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 13, 1972 [JA] |
|
|
47-25370 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
139/435.1;
139/420R |
Current CPC
Class: |
D03D
15/50 (20210101); D03D 15/00 (20130101); D03D
15/283 (20210101); D03D 47/32 (20130101); C10M
2207/281 (20130101); D10B 2331/02 (20130101); C10M
2215/042 (20130101); C10M 2207/283 (20130101); C10M
2207/286 (20130101); C10M 2215/10 (20130101); D10B
2331/04 (20130101); C10M 2219/044 (20130101); C10M
2207/282 (20130101); D10B 2321/10 (20130101); C10N
2040/46 (20200501) |
Current International
Class: |
D03D
15/00 (20060101); D03d 047/32 () |
Field of
Search: |
;139/127R,127P,383,42R,426R |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Jaudon; Henry S.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sherman & Shalloway
Claims
What we claim is:
1. A method for weaving a warp and a weft on a water jet loom,
wherein a non-sized interlaced yarn with the individual constituent
filaments being randomly twisted and interlaced is used as the warp
and an ordinary non-interlaced yarn is used as the weft, and the
weaving is carried out while maintaining the coefficient of static
friction of the warp against the weft in the wet state at not more
than 0.6, and the water-insolubility of the warp and the weft at 30
to 90 percent.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the warp and the weft are a
multifilament yarn of a polyamide, polyester or
polyacrylonitrile.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the multifilament yarn has a
monofilament denier of 1 to 5 and contains 12 to 48 monofilaments.
Description
This invention relates to a novel method for weaving on a water jet
loom.
The conventional machine for weaving a filament yarn to make a
fabric includes shuttle looms which have been used widely from old
and shuttleless looms which have been developed relatively
recently. The sluttleless looms have attracted especial attention
for their advantage of producing woven fabrics at high speed. The
water jet loom, a kind of the shuttleless loom, is adapted to carry
a yarn on a stream of water jetted out from a nozzle and pick it
up. Since water is used, this loom is applied mainly to the weaving
of hydrophobic fibers, and has attracted especial attention in the
art because of their various superior performances. In a weaving
operation using the water jet loom, it is generally considered
necessary to employ a pre-weaving step in which a warp is twisted
and sized in order to impart coherency to it, just as in an
ordinary shuttle loom. The warp so treated is then subjected to an
ordinary warping process, and woven on the loom. The pre-weaving
step is intended to reduce the occurrence of fluff or yarn breakage
at the time of weaving. When a fabric produced by the above method
is dyed, it is necessary to non-size the size applied to the yarn
in the sizing step by scouring, in order to obtain a uniform
dyeing. However, with the above method, it is difficult to prevent
the occurrence of injuries to the fibers in the twisting step, and
the employment of the complicated preweaving process itself adds
greatly to the cost of production. Furthermore, the size applied in
the size step tends to be removed in the subsequent weaving step,
which in turn causes a reduction in the quality of the resulting
fabric. Therefore, the omission of the pre-weaving step would be
very desirable since the various troubles ascribable to this step
can be removed, and the cost of production can be reduced, and
naturally, the step of removing sizes can be omitted and the
scouring and dyeing step can be rationalized. Attempts have been
made in the art to realize this by using an interlaced yarn as
warp. By the interlaced yarn is meant a yarn obtained by applying
fluid forces to a multifilament yarn to twist and interlace the
individual filaments of the yarn randomly, thereby to impart
coherency to the yarn. From the viewpoint of imparting coherency,
interlacing between the filaments has equivalent operation and
result to true twisting or sizing. The interlaced yarn itself is
well known to those skilled in the art, and a method for its
production is described, for example, in British Pat. specification
No. 924,089. Since the interlaced yarn has sufficient coherency
even when not twisted or sized, it will be possible to subject it
directly to the warping process without the pre-weaving step, and
then weave it on a loom. Surprisingly, however, we have found that
when the interlaced yarn is woven on a water jet loom,
non-uniformity in the density of the fabric occurs in the weft
direction (the so-called tight weft phenomenon), and causes a
marked reduction in the quality of the fabric.
An object of this invention is to provide a novel method for
weaving on a water jet loom hereby density non-uniformity in the
weft direction does not occur even when an interlaced yarn produced
by an ordinary method is used as a warp yarn.
Another object of this invention is to provide a method for weaving
on a water jet loom having high speed performances, wherein weaving
can be carried out in the absence of the twisting and sizing steps
and the desizing step can be omitted in deying to be carried out
later on, thus leading to a markedly reduced cost of
production.
According to the present invention, there is provided a method for
weaving a warp and a weft on a water jet loom, wherein a non-sized
interlaced yarn with the individual constituent filaments being
randomly twisted and interlaced is used as the warp and an ordinary
non-interlaced yarn is used as the weft, and the weaving is carried
out while maintaining the co-efficient of static friction of the
warp against the weft in the wet state at not more than 0.6, and
the water-insolubility of the warp and the weft at 30 to 90
percent.
The method of this invention will be described below in greater
detail. We have made extensive investigations into the casue of the
density non-uniformity which occurs in the weft direction of the
fabric when an interlaced yarn is woven on a water jet loom without
being subjected to the pre-weaving process. This led to the
discovery that since the weft is thrown by water in the picking
process in the water jet loom and the weft and the warp are placed
under the wet conditions, the finish on the surfaces of the
filaments of the warp and the weft drop off, and the surface
properties of the warp and the weft change remarkably; and that the
frictional resistance between both yarns on their fiber surfaces
becomes high and as a result, non-uniformity in the density of weft
occurs.
Warps and wefts usually used in the conventional weaving processes
have a water-insolubility of not more than 20 percent, and a
coefficient of static friction of the warp to the weft in the wet
state of 0.7 to 0.8. The "water-insolubility," as used herein, is
the weight percent of an finish which remains unremoved when a
filament having applied thereto an finish is immersed for 1 minute
in water at 25.degree.C. The "coefficient of static friction of the
warp to the weft in the wet state" is a value measured by the Roder
method which is well known in the art. According to this
measurement method, a number of wefts are uniformly attached in
parallel to each other to the surface of a cylindrical holder to
form a friction body, and one warp is hung on this friction body in
a manner such that the warp intersects the wefts at right angles.
The cylindrical holder is rotated to cause friction between the
warp and the wefts, and the coefficient of friction between them is
measured while maintaining both the warp and the wefts in the wet
state. The speed of rotation of the cylindrical holder is varied,
and the coefficient of friction corresponding to the respective
speed of rotation is measured. The coefficient of static friction
is the value of the coefficient of friction which is obtained when
the speed of rotation is extrapolated to zero.
As previously stated, the conventional wefts and warps have
relatively low water-insolubility values, and when subjected to a
water jet loom, intersect each other in the wet state, which tends
to cause the removal of the oil attached to the surface of the
filaments, and a consequent rise in frictional resistance between
them. Furthermore, by the influences of the removal of the finish
on the surface of the filaments, the coefficient of friction of the
warp to the weft in the wet condition is increased to a greater
extent. If wefts and warps having such increased coefficient of
friction are used, slippage during weaving becomes very poor, and
as a result, non-uniformity in density occurs in the weft direction
of the fabric.
On the basis of the above analysis, we have made extensive research
and development work in an attempt to remove the non-uniformity in
weft density which occurs when using an interlaced yarn, and to
rationalize the scouring and dyeing process. Consequently, we have
found that the above difficulties can be overcome be weaving wefts
and warps of the specified surface properties on a water jet loom,
and this led to the accomplishment of the present invention.
It is essential that in the method of this invention, a non-sized
interlaced yarn be used as a warp and an ordinary non-interlaced
yarn as a weft when weaving on a water jet loom. By the term
"non-sized" is meant that a size such as polyvinyl alcohol or
starch generally used to impart coherency to filaments is not
applied. The interlaced yarn may be produced by any known methods.
The use of a non-interlaced yarn as weft is a necessary condition.
If an interlaced yarn were used also as the weft, the resulting
fabric would have a defect called "flash."
It is also necessary that the coefficient of friction of the warp
to the weft under the wet conditions should be not more than 0.6.
If this coefficient exceeds 0.6, the weft undergoes frictional
resistance when picked during weaving on a water jet loom, and it
becomes impossible to arrange the wefts regularly at the
predetermined positions. This results in the occurrence of the
non-uniformity in weft density, and the results intended by the
present invention cannot be obtained. The lower limit of the
coefficient of friction is not particularly critical, but
preferably, it is usually about 0.4.
If the water-insolubility of either the weft or the warp is less
than 30 percent, the treating agent applied to the yarns is removed
in great quantities by the action of water during weaving on a
water jet and consequently, the frictional resistance between the
wefts and the warps in the weaving process increases, leading to
the occurrence of the non-uniformity in weft density. On the other
hand, when the water-insolubility of the treating agent for the
warp and the weft exceeds 90 percent or when the interlaced yarn as
warp is sized, it is necessary to remove the treating agent in the
scouring and dyeing process, and the omission of the scouring step
becomes difficult.
Since the individual filaments of the warp used in the method of
this invention are fully interlaced with each other, it is not
necessary to size it prior to weaving. Furthermore, the frictional
resistance between the warp and the weft is low, and the
water-insolubility is more than 30 percent. Accordingly, there is a
reduced proportion of the treating agent that is removed by the
action of water. Thus, during weaving on a water jet loom, the
frictional coefficient between the weft and the warp is maintained
low, and the occurrence of the non-uniformity in the weft density
of the fabric can be prevented. Furthermore, since the
water-insolubility of the weft and warp is not more than 90 percent
and the warp is not sized, no special step of removing the treating
agent is required in the scouring and dyeing process, and it become
possible to omit the scouring step.
The suitable warp and weft used in this invention are a
multifilament yarn. Suitable filaments are polyester, polyamide,
and polyacrylonitrile filaments. The number of the filaments or the
total denier of the multifilament yarn is not particularly limited.
Usually, however, multifilament yarns having a monofilament denier
of 1 to 5 containing 12, to 48 monofilaments are preferred.
The specified water-insolubility and frictional coefficient values
of the warp and the weft used in this invention can be realized by
properly choosing the finish or other treating agent to be applied
to the multifilament yarn. This choice is obvious to those skilled
in the art.
There are various treating agents for the warp and weft to be used
in the present invention. When the treating agent is applied during
spinning, the treating agent should suitably contain 60 to 90
percent of a lubricant, preferably a synthetic lubricant, and it is
preferred that the lubricant should be applied so as to cover the
surfaces of the filaments. Suitable lubricants are, for example,
trimethylol propane tridecanoate, isotridecyl stearate, oleyl
oleate, isocetyl stearate, isostearyl stearate, and 2-ethyl hexyl
palmitate. Although not a lubricant, wax and low molecular weight
polyethylene are also effective for reducing the coefficient of
static friction of the yarn in the wet state when used in a small
amount. The amount of lubricant in the entire treating agent is
preferably 60 to 90 percent by weight. The amount of the wax or low
molecular weight polyethylene may be several percent. As is well
known in the art, another ingredient such as an emulsifier or
antistatic agent may be incorporated into the treating agent. It is
preferred that the amount of the treating agent to be adhered to
the yarn be 0.6 to 1.5 percent by weight as the total finish pick
up, and 0.4 to 1.4 percent by weight as the amount of the lubricant
adhered. The total finish pick up is measured by a method utilizing
extraction with cyclohexane, and the amount of the lubricant
adhered is calculated from the total finish pick up and the
proportion of the lubricant based on the total amount of the
treating agent.
The application of the treating agent to filaments is mainly
performed during a yarn-making process involving spinning and
drawing, and in the case of an interlaced yarn, the treating agent
is applied before or after interlacing. The time of application,
however, is not limited to this, and it is possible to apply the
treating agent at any desired stage after drawing up to the weaving
process.
The following Examples will illustrate the present invention. The
non-uniformity of weft density and the degree of dyeing uneveneness
used in the Examples were evaluated by the naked eye on a scale of
grades 1 to 5 using 10 samples each having a length of 46 to 50 m,
and average values were calculated.
Grade1: Not perceptible at all
Grade 2: Slightly perceptible
Grade 3: Perceptible to some extent
Grade 4: Considerably perceptible
Grade 5: Very considerably perceptible
EXAMPLE 1
In a process for obtaining a drawn yarn of poly-caproamide (70
denier/16 filaments) by an ordinary spinning and drawing method, an
emulsion consisting of 50% of mineral oil (lubricant), 47% of an
ethylene oxide added oleyl alcohol (emulsifier) and 3% of diethanol
oleoamide (emulsifier having antistatic properties) was applied to
the yarn to a total finish pick up of 1.0% during the take-up of
the yarn (the water-insolubility of this yarn was 48%). Immediately
after drawing, the yarn was interlaced by treating with turbulent
fluids through a known nozzle to form an interlaced yarn. This
interlaced yarn was supplied as a warp without sizing. As a weft,
there was used a drawn yarn of polycapramide (70 denier/24
filaments) obtained by a usual spinning and drawing method wherein
each of the various emulsions shown in Table 1 was applied to the
filament during the take-up of the spun filaments. A plain weave
taffeta was produced on a water jet loom using these warp and weft
yarns.
Table 1 shows the composition of the emulsion used to produce the
warp, the proportion of the lubricant in the emulsion, the
coefficient of friction of the warp to the weft in the wet state
(.mu..sub.w), the water-insolubility of the weft, the weft
non-uniformity in weft density druing weaving on a water jet loom,
and the dyeing unevenness of the fabric dyed without scouring.
##SPC1##
In Runs Nos. 1 and 5 which were performed in accordance with the
method of this invention, there was hardly any non-uniformity in
weft density and yarn uneveness of the fabric, and the resulting
fabric had uniform good quality. In Run No. 2, the degree of
density non-uniformity is high because of the low
water-insolubility of the weft, and in Run No. 4, the degree of
density non-uniformity of the fabric is high because of the high
.mu..sub.w value. In Run No. 3, the water-insolubility of the weft
is too high, dyeing uneveness occurs in the weft direction when the
resulting fabric is dyed without scouring. Accordingly, such a
fabric must be dyed after removing the finish, and it is impossible
to rationalize the souring and dyeing process as intended by the
present invention.
The degree of the density non-uniformity was evaluated by the naked
eye. The actual state of the non-uniformity can be clearly observed
by the accompanying phtographs designated FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG. 1 is
a microscopic photograph of the fabric obtained in Run No. 1 which
shows that the sizes of the warps and wefts and the distances
between the wefts and between the warps are uniform. FIG. 2 is a
microscopic photograph of the fabric obtained by the method of Run
No. 4, which shows that the sizes of the warps and the distances
between the warps are uniform, but the sizes of the wefts and the
distances between the wefts are very non-uniform. The arrows in the
figures show the warp direction.
EXAMPLE 2
In a process for obtaining a poly-caproamide drawn yarn (70
denier/16 filaments) by an ordinary spinning and drawing method,
each of the various emulsions shown in Table 2 was applied to the
filaments, and immediately after drawing, the yarn was interlaced
using turbulent fluids through known nozzles. Without sizing, the
resulting interlaced yarn was supplied as a warp. As a weft, there
was used an ordinary drawn yarn of polty-caproamide (70 denier/24
filaments) wherein the emulsion used in Example 1 to produce the
warp was applied to the yarn to an finish pick-up of 1% (the
water-insolubility of the yarn was 46%). Using these warp and weft,
weaving was performed on a water jet loom in the same way as in
Example 1.
The treating conditions and the test results of the resulting
fabrics are shown in Table 2 below. ##SPC2##
The results obtained are very similar to those obtained in Example
1.
EXAMPLE 3
Weaving on a water jet loom was performed using the combinations of
warps and wefts shown in Table 3. The numbers indicated in the rows
of the warp and weft show the number of the Runs in Examples 1 and
2. For example, in Run No. 11, the same yarn as used in Run No. 7
was used as the warp and the same yarn as used in Run No. 1 as the
weft.
TABLE 3
Run Nos. 11 12 13 14 Warp No. 7 No. 8 No. 6 No. 6 Weft No. 1 No. 1
No. 2 No. 3 Coefficient of 0.35 0.34 0.32 0.31 friction
(.mu..sub.w) Water-insolubi- lity (%) of the 25 96 66 66 warp
Water-insolubi- lity (%) of the 65 65 22 95 weft Nonuniformity in
weft density 4.5 1.0 5.0 1.0 (grade) Dyeing unevenness (grade) Warp
1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 Weft 2.0 1.0 2.0 4.0
The results shown in Table 3 demonstrate that when the coefficient
of friction (.mu..sub.w) is within the range specified in the
present invention but the water-insolubility of either of the warp
or the weft is too low or high, the intended results of the
invention cannot be obtained.
EXAMPLE 4
In a process for producing a drawn yarn of polyethylene
terephthalate (50 denier/24 filaments) by an ordinary spinning and
drawing method, each of the various emulsions shown in Table 4 was
applied to the filament during the take-up of the filament, and
after drawing, the yarn was interlaced by turbulent fluids using a
known nozzle. The resulting interlaced yarn was fed as a warp
without sizing. As a weft, there was used a drawn yarn of
polyethylene terephthalate (50 denier/24 filaments) obtained by an
ordinary spinning and drawing method wherein the emulsion
consisting of 50 % of mineral oil, 42% of an ethylene oxide added
oleyl ether, 3% of dioctyl sulfosuccinate and 5% of oleic acid
triethanol amine to produce the warp s applied to the yarn during
the take-up of the spun filament to an finish pick-up of 1% (the
water -insolubility of the yarn was 50%). Using these warp and
weft, weaving on a water jet loom was performed.
The treating conditions and the test results of the resulting
fabrics are shown in Table 4 below. ##SPC3##
The results obtained are similar to those obtained in Example
1.
* * * * *