U.S. patent number 3,812,912 [Application Number 05/267,955] was granted by the patent office on 1974-05-28 for reproducible shot hole apparatus.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Gulf Research & Development Company. Invention is credited to Paul C. Wuenschel.
United States Patent |
3,812,912 |
Wuenschel |
May 28, 1974 |
REPRODUCIBLE SHOT HOLE APPARATUS
Abstract
A reproducible shot hole for geophysical use wherein a
deformable metal liner, such as aluminum, of predetermined
diameter, wall thickness, and alloy is selected, and the annulus
between the liner and the hole filled with sand-cement under
pressure, so that the lined hole will withstand repeated explosions
by expanding.
Inventors: |
Wuenschel; Paul C. (Glenshaw,
PA) |
Assignee: |
Gulf Research & Development
Company (Pittsburgh, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
26767983 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/267,955 |
Filed: |
June 30, 1972 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
82907 |
Oct 22, 1970 |
3693717 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
166/207 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B
17/00 (20130101); G01V 1/104 (20130101); E21B
33/14 (20130101); E21B 43/103 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21B
17/00 (20060101); E21B 33/13 (20060101); E21B
43/02 (20060101); E21B 43/10 (20060101); E21B
33/14 (20060101); G01V 1/02 (20060101); G01V
1/104 (20060101); E21b 017/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;166/315,299,285,207,187,203 ;285/45,133R |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Brown; David H.
Parent Case Text
This application is a division of my prior copending application
Ser. No. 82,907 filed Oct. 22, 1970, entitled "Reproducible Shot
Hole", assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, and
now U.S. Pat. No. 3,693,717.
Claims
I claim:
1. In apparatus for making a reproducible shot hole in the earth,
the combination comprising a string of casing which includes a
length of shot hole liner to be positioned at the depth at which
shots are to be fired; a coupling having means to mount an end of
said casing string and an end of said liner therein, a tapered
sleeve surrounding the end portion of said liner and having its
thickest end at said coupling; and means to join said thick end of
said sleeve, the end of said liner, and said coupling together;
whereby said liner at said coupling is highly resistant to
expansion and decreasingly less resistant to expansion at points on
said liner spaced along said sleeve moving away from said
coupling.
2. The combination of claim 1, said liner consisting of
aluminum.
3. In apparatus for a reproducible shot hole the improvement
comprising a string of casing cemented in the shot hole to a depth
below the weathered zone at which the shot is to be fired, said
string of casing having a cylindrical liner of ductile material
through the interval of the hole at which the shot is to be fired,
a steel sleeve at each end of the liner surrounding and spaced
slightly from the liner and extending from the end of the liner
toward the center thereof for a distance to support the ends of the
liner and leave the liner unsupported in the interval at which the
shot is to be fired.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 in which each of the sleeves is of
greatest thickness at the end of the liner and tapers to a reduced
thickness at the end of the sleeve nearest the midpoint of the
liner.
5. The apparatus of claim 3 in which the liner is in the borehole
within a sheath of a cement-sand mixture set under an elevated
pressure to fill voids and reinforce weak formations surrounding
the liner.
6. Apparatus as set forth in claim 3 in which the liner is
aluminum.
7. Apparatus as set forth in claim 3 in which the ratio of the
thickness of the liner to its diameter is approximately 3:100.
8. Apparatus for a reproducible shot hole comprising an upper
section of steel casing and a lower section of steel casing, an
upper coupling at the lower end of the upper section and a lower
coupling at the upper end of the lower section, an aluminum liner
extending between the upper section and lower section of casing and
having its upper end mounted in the upper coupling and its lower
end mounted in the lower coupling, an upper sleeve surrounding and
secured to the upper coupling and extending therefrom downwardly
part of the distance to the lower end of the liner, a lower sleeve
surrounding and secured to the lower coupling and extending
upwardly therefrom a part of the distance to the lower end of the
upper sleeve to leave a central portion of the liner unsurrounded
by the sleeve.
9. Apparatus as set forth in claim 8 in which the sleeves taper
from a section of maximum thickness at the ends secured to the
couplings.
Description
This invention pertains to geophysical exploration, particularly
seismic exploration. In seismic exploration a reproducible source
of elastic waves in the earth, such as is generated by the
detonation of a charge of explosives, is highly desirable. In
conventional seismic exploration, a hole is drilled, explosives put
in the hole, a relatively large array of detectors are placed about
the area, and the shot fired. The hole, or the part of the hole
where the shot is detonated, is destroyed in the process, so that a
shallower level in the same hole must be used, or a new hole must
be drilled for the next shot, if a repeat shot is desired. It would
be very much preferred to have the ability to fire many charges
from one hole at the same depth, with assurance that the waves
produced will be substantially the same from shot to shot, while
moving a much smaller array of detectors about the area to be
explored.
Heretofore, a reproducible shot hole of the character described was
completely unknown in the art. If the liner or pipe used to protect
the hole was made sufficiently strong to resist expansion from the
explosions, then it was found to restrict the radiation of the
elastic waves and hence would be a poor source. On the other hand,
heretofore, if the pipe or liner was made so that it was a good
wave radiator, it was not strong enough to stand more than one or a
very few shots. The invention provides steps and apparatus to
provide a lined shot hole which will expand upon repeated firings
of charges while maintaining substantially constant good wave
radiation qualities, and yet maintaining freedom of passage so that
the next charge can be put in place.
The invention is not to be confused with the many different kinds
of surface seismic sources which are presently in use. Such surface
types have many advantages, including claimed reproducibility, but
all suffer nevertheless from the disadvantage that the waves
produced must pass from the surface device, through the "weathered
layer" before passing through the deeper areas of interest. Such
surface sources include vehicles which drop heavy weights on the
ground, means which vibrate the ground, or means which set off
small charges of gas in a "bomb" or other strong enclosure which is
in contact with the surface. The "weathered layer" is the topmost
part of the crust of the earth, varying in thickness according to
location, and is highly variable in its ability to transmit elastic
waves. The present invention, like conventional seismic
exploration, utilizes a shot hole drilled to below the weathered
layer which overcomes this disadvantage in surface types in that
the source, the explosive charge, is fired at a location below the
weathered layer.
Another advantage of the use of dynamite as a seismic source is the
ability to excite a specific band of frequencies by the choice of
the appropriate charge size and shooting medium. The present
invention will apply to a wide range of shooting media consisting
of loosely consolidated gravel at one end of the range to a well
cemented shale at the other end of the range, and it will
accommodate linear charge densities of virtually any size.
Repeat shots from a single hole to a moving relatively small array
of detectors produces a result virtually identical to that produced
by a single shot shooting to a very large array of many hundreds of
detectors. Such a large array, as a practical matter, is
impossible, and in any case would be prohibitively expensive. The
invention requires that only one shot hole be drilled, thereby not
substantially increasing the cost of the method of the invention as
compared to conventional seismic exploration.
The invention entails a balancing of many different parameters to
achieve the final reproducible shot hole. Examples are set forth in
detail in the specification below, but generally the method
requires balancing the degree of rigidity, consolidation or
hardness of the surrounding formation with the diameter of and
ductility of the liner used to case the shot hole. The invention
includes a liner consisting of certain grades of aluminum, and
means to protect the junction of the aluminum pipe with the normal
steel well casing used to lower the aluminum liner to the area at
which the explosions will be detonated. The means of supporting a
ductile pipe, such as aluminum, along with means to prevent
shearing of the pipe at its ends, are important parts, along with
others set forth below, of the method and apparatus of the
invention.
The liner can be made of materials other than aluminum. Steel for
example, can be used, but the diameters required when shooting in a
soft formation would be prohibitive. Aluminum, because of its
ductility can be of reasonable dimensions and this is the reason
for the preference for liners of the more ductile materials.
The present invention is one of a family of related inventions all
pertaining to improvement of the seismic method. The related
inventions, all copending with the present invention and all
assigned to the same assignee, in addition to the parent
application identified above of which the present application is a
division, are:
"Clamped Detector" by Carl A. Gustavson, Emmett B. Shutes and Paul
C. Wuenschel, Ser. No. 255,229, filed May 19, 1972 and now U.S.
Pat. No. 3,777,814.
"Device for Gripping and Imparting Slack in A Cable" by Carl A.
Gustavson, Emmett B. Shutes and Paul C. Wuenschel, Ser. No.
256,780, filed May 25, 1972.
"Precision Seismology" by Paul C. Wuenschel, Ser. No. 227,985,
filed Feb. 22, 1972 and now abandoned.
The invention entitled "Precision Seismology" identified above is
an overall method of using the present invention as well as the
other inventions in a single integrated seismic exploration
system.
The above and other advantages of the invention will be pointed out
or will become evident in the following detailed description and
claims, and in the accompanying drawing also forming a part of the
disclosure in which: FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view through a
portion of the earth showing a completed but unfired reproducible
shot hole of the invention in place; FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of
part of the apparatus of the invention; FIG. 3 is a composite
diagrammatic showing of the reproducible shot hole of the invention
after a number of shots have been fired and illustrating the
configuration of the hole when certain steps in the method are
omitted; and FIG. 4 is an accurate chart which summarizes a large
amount of experimental work, and which can be used in practicing
the invention.
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to FIG. 1, there is
shown a cross-section of the earth 10 in which the shots are to be
fired. The method of the invention will be set forth below in
conjunction with the description of FIG. 1, it being understood
that FIG. 1 shows conditions after the hole has been prepared and
is ready to have the first shot fired.
The first step is to determine the nature of formation 10,
specifically the rigidity of the rock. This can be determined from
previous experience or by drilling a small diameter hole, studying
the samples obtained while drilling, observing the drilling rate,
and running logs in the hole after drilling. With this information
and with knowledge of the seismic frequency band desired, one
skilled in the art will know the linear charge density of the
explosive required. The linear charge density and the rigidity of
the rock together in turn determine the selection of the material
for and diameter of the liner 14, which, of course, in turn
determines the final hole diameter 12. It is desired to have the
liner as snugly fitted in the hole 12 as possible, so that the
liner will be supported by the formation.
The general considerations in selecting the liner 14 include that
its ductility should be inversely proportional to the degree of
consolidation. Restated, the softer the formation, the more ductile
the material of the liner. The reason for this relationship is that
the liner 14 will expand more against a softer formation than it
will against a harder formation. The invention accommodates to this
fact by providing the ability to expand rather than by trying to
make the liner so strong that it cannot expand. Heretofore, and in
preliminary tests run in conjunction with development of the
present invention, it was found that less ductile materials, such
as various grades of steel, promptly burst after one or two
explosions because they did not have the ability to expand in
response to the explosive force. As is evident, once the liner is
burst, the hole quickly fills with debris which enters the hole via
the fissure, thus precluding further access to that depth.
Wall thickness of the liner is not crucial when the pipe is
supported by a formation, but should be in ratio to the pipe
diameter at about 3:100. If the wall is too thin, the pipe will
break due to small irregularities in the supporting medium. If it
is too thick, the stiffness will limit the radiation efficiency of
the explosion. The tolerance on the value given above is believed
quite large but has not as yet been established by experiment.
The next step comprises assembling liner 14 into a string of
conventional steel casing 16 which will be used to lower liner 14
to the specific depth at which the charges are to be detonated.
Means 18 are provided to protect the joints between liner 14 and
casing string 16. Protection means 18 will be described in detail
below in conjunction with the description of FIG. 2.
Once the liner 14 is located at the depth of interest, it is
necessary to stabilize the borehole 12 in the vicinity of the
explosions and to support the liner 14 with respect to the
borehole. Conventional well cement has been found to be not
satisfactory in that it does not have sufficient strength.
Accordingly, the invention comprises the use of a sand-cement
mixture 20 filling the annulus between the liner 14 and casing 16
and the borehole 12. For the same reason, i.e., stabilizing the
borehole, it has been advantageous to "squeeze" the sandcement 20
into the annulus. The reason for pressurizing the sand-cement
during its placement is to assure that any voids, or small local
unconsolidated regions, are filled to provide a uniform strength
around liner 14. Such local discontinuities, are caused by, for
example, gravel streaks in formation 10, sand and the like. Such a
weak place is indicated in FIG. 1 by reference numeral 22, and is
shown after the squeezing of sandcement 20 as being filled with
mixture 20. After setting, the strength of the support around liner
14 will be uniform.
The final step is locating the charge assembly 24 in the completed
reproducible shot hole. Charge assembly 24 comprises, starting at
the lower end, a weight 26 to pull the remainder of the assembly 24
down the hole with the aid of gravity. A cable or other suitable
means 28 interconnects weight 26 with the charge 30. The charge 30
may be any explosive normally used in seismic exploration, one such
explosive being a type of dynamite sold under the DuPont registered
trademark "Nitramon" having a strength of 2 pounds per foot. The
legends on FIG. 4 indicate the tradenames and strengths of other
charges which may be used. The top of charge 30 is connected by a
cable 32 to a centralizing sub-assembly 34 comprising upper and
lower bow springs 36 interconnected by a support member 38. The
cable 32 bridges across the sub-assembly 34 to deliver electricity
to the charge. The supporting member 38 is preferably made of wood
or other light material since it is desired that it remain intact
as it is frequently shot out of the hole upon explosion of charge
30. It is desired that sub-assembly 34 remain intact so that it can
be removed and reused and not hinder placement of the next shot.
Further, a hard wood such as maple is preferred to a soft wood such
as pine because the latter tends to shatter and the hard wood does
not. The use of centralizer sub-assembly 34, or other means to
centralize the charge 30 in the hole, is important to successful
use of the invention in that if the charge be very much closer to
one side of the hole than to the other, that side is more
susceptible to bursting. As is conventional, the entire hole may be
filled with water to couple the explosive force to the borehole.
Water is readily available and inexpensive, but other fluids such
as drilling mud could be used in other circumstances.
Referring now to FIG. 2, the joint protection means 18 are shown in
detail. The essence of the manner of protection of the joint
between the "soft" aluminum liner 14 and the "hard" steel casing 16
is the provision of a tapered sleeve 40 extending from the joint in
closely spaced relation to each end of the liner 14 to provide a
differential and increasing force from the end of the sleeve
towards the joint tending to resist expansion of the liner. Thus,
at the joint virtually no expansion of the liner occurs while
between the ends of the two sleeves 40, the liner 14 is supported
only by the sand-cement mixture 20 and the formation 10.
Referring in detail to FIG. 2, the casing string 16 is joined to
the liner by means of casing couplings 42. The coupling 42 at each
end of the liner 14 is modified for cooperation with the liner by
cutting away part of one set of threads as at 44 and by
undercutting the outside of the coupling opposite cut-out 44 as at
46. A taper 47 is provided at the end of undercut 44. Thus, an
annular flange 48 is formed between cut-out 44 and undercut 46. A
shoulder 50 is formed at the inner end of cut-out 44 against which
an end of the liner 14 seats. The thick end of sleeve 40 fits in
undercut 46 on the outside of flange 48 and is fixed thereto by
suitable means such as a bead of welding 52. The assembly of sleeve
40, flange 48, and liner 14 is finally secured together by a row of
bolts 54 provided in mating openings in these three members and
threaded into the liner 14. The heads of the bolts are preferably
of the socket type so that a minimum obstruction is provided on the
outside of the sleeve 40. The inside surface 56 of the sleeve is
cylindrical, and the outside surface 58 thereof tapers towards
surface 56 to provide a thinnest portion of the sleeve at the end
thereof furthest from bolts 54. A clearance space, of roughly the
thickness of flange 48, is provided between sleeve 40 and liner
14.
Thus, the joint between the casing string 16 and the liner 14 is
protected by virtue of the tapered sleeve 40 in that the liner will
have very little additional resistance to expansion opposite the
thin end of the sleeve, but that such resistance will gradually
increase moving towards the bolts 54. As will appear more clearly
below, absent the sleeve, the liner would simply shear off the
coupling on the lower end of casing 16.
During the development of the present invention a relatively large
number of tests were run. Initially, these tests were in the nature
of feasibility studies to see if a reproducible shot hole could
actually be made and to verify that the deformation produced by
several small charges is equivalent to the deformation produced by
one large charge whose magnitude is the sum of the small charges.
This was found to be true for unsupported pipes by Johnson, et al.,
and it was necessary to establish the same relationship for
supported pipes. This work is reported in a paper entitled "The
Explosive Expansion of Unrestrained Tubes" by W. Johnson, E. Doege,
and F. W. Travis, in the 1964-5 Proceedings of the Institution of
Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 179, Part 1, No. 7, pages 240-256.
After this initial work was successfully completed it was then
necessary to evaluate the support provided by various types of wall
rock. Two extreme cases as to rigidity were chosen, a loosely
consolidated gravel and a well silicified shale whose compressional
velocity is 12,000 feet per second. An aluminum pipe of alloy
3003-0 with a wall thickness to diameter ratio of 0.03 was found to
withstand a strain of 180 percent before breaking when expanded
with gravel support and was emplaced according to the invention.
With this knowledge and data obtained from all experiments
conducted in gravel and hard rock it became possible to summarize
the design parameters for a viable tool in a single graph, as is
reproduced in FIG. 4.
The ordinate in FIG. 4 is the pipe diameter required to permit the
desired number of repeat shots at various linear charge densities
as given by the abscissa and identified by DuPont tradenames and
corresponding weights for a total strain of 180 percent. The
parameters used in FIG. 4 are the supporting medium. Loosely
consolidated gravel provides the least support while hard rock
provides the most support. An intermediate medium of moderately
packed gravel lies in between these two curves. Other media such as
clay, shale, porous limestone, etc. will yield curves falling
between the moderately packed gravel and the hard rock.
The curves of FIG. 4 are applicable for a strain of 180 percent and
pertain to ductile materials like aluminum. Similar curves can be
made for other strains and thereby be applicable to other
materials.
Several general principles can be drawn from the specific data
presented in FIG. 4, as well as from other tests not included in
drawing the curves. Two of these principles are illustrated in the
showing of FIG. 3. After each shot or each few shots the borehole
diameter was physically measured with the use of hole calipering
tools. The data presented in diagrammatic form in FIG. 3 was taken
from these caliper logs. The solid line labeled 60 shows the
measured condition of the borehole when the invention was used in a
preferred form. The dotted line 62 was run with all conditions the
same as in the test indicated by the line 60 with the exception
that the sandcement was not put in under pressure. Note that the
liner 14 was pushed deep into the loosely consolidated portions of
the formation. The liner will burst when the strain exceeds a
critical value which depends on the metal used, for aluminum this
value is about 180 percent. The final dot-dash line 64 shows the
effect of the protection means 18 and the tapered sleeve 40. Absent
sleeve 40, the liner promptly shears at its joints with the casing
16. Note the gradual and gentle expansion of the liner over the
outer half of each sleeve. As fabricated in the successfully used
and tested embodiments of the invention, the sleeve 40 had a length
of about 3 feet tapered over only its outer half. The liner 14 had
a length of about 20 feet in all tests.
While the invention has been described in detail above, it is to be
understood that this detailed description is by way of example
only, and the protection granted is to be limited only within the
spirit of the invention and the scope of the following claims.
* * * * *