U.S. patent number 3,802,537 [Application Number 05/226,871] was granted by the patent office on 1974-04-09 for apparatus for fluid flow precision pressure-reduction, and attenuation and diffusion of jet-produced sound without substantial sound-regeneration in jet-port arrays, including valves and the like.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc.. Invention is credited to Pritchard H. White.
United States Patent |
3,802,537 |
White |
April 9, 1974 |
APPARATUS FOR FLUID FLOW PRECISION PRESSURE-REDUCTION, AND
ATTENUATION AND DIFFUSION OF JET-PRODUCED SOUND WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL
SOUND-REGENERATION IN JET-PORT ARRAYS, INCLUDING VALVES AND THE
LIKE
Abstract
This disclosure deals with the precision pressure reduction of a
fluid stream while attenuating and diffusing jet-produced sound
therein from a jet-port array as in valves and the like, but
without substantial sound-regeneration during the same, through the
use of enveloping apertured screens and the like positioned close
to the vortex mixing region and adapted to produce a controlled
gradual frictional reduction in pressure gradient while controlling
the velocity of the streams exiting from the jet-port array.
Inventors: |
White; Pritchard H. (Sherman
Oaks, CA) |
Assignee: |
Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc.
(Cambridge, MA)
|
Family
ID: |
22850761 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/226,871 |
Filed: |
February 16, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
181/226; 138/42;
251/127; 137/625.3 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F01N
1/165 (20130101); F01N 1/08 (20130101); Y10T
137/86734 (20150401) |
Current International
Class: |
F01N
1/16 (20060101); F01N 1/08 (20060101); F01n
003/06 () |
Field of
Search: |
;181/37,36R,36A,36B,36C,36D,63,69,50,42,55,56
;137/14,625,625.28,625.3 ;138/40,42,43 ;251/127,118 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Wilkinson; Richard B.
Assistant Examiner: Gonzales; John F.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Rines and Rines Shapiro and
Shapiro
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. Apparatus for the precision pressure-reduction of a fluid stream
without substantial sound-regeneration during such reduction, said
apparatus having, in combination, a longitudinally extending
conduit provided with an inlet and having a plurality of jet ports
extending through the thickness of a wall of the conduit and spaced
therealong, at least several of said jet ports being open
concurrently; means for applying to the inlet a fluid stream under
pressure so as to enable the successive exiting of successive
portions of the stream at successive open jet ports as the stream
passes along the conduit; means enveloping the jet ports externally
of the conduit for breaking up each portion of the fluid stream
from each of the jet ports into a multiplicity of relatively small
independent streams and for producing a controlled reduction in
pressure by viscous friction, the last-mentioned means comprising
apertured surface means immediately adjacent to the jet ports where
mixing vortex turbulence would normally be produced by the stream
portions exiting therefrom, and a plurality of additional apertured
surface means closely surrounding the first-mentioned apertured
surface means at successive positions transversely away from said
conduit, each of said surface means extending longitudinally of
said conduit and having a multiplicity of closely spaced apertures
much smaller than the jet ports and thus frictionally resistive to
the exiting stream portions, and said plurality of surface means
being of progressively greater area transversely away from said
conduit for maintaining the exiting stream portions at
substantially constant velocity during passage through said
apertured surface means and while being reduced in pressure, the
outermost surface means having its multiplicity of apertures open
to a medium of low velocity relative to the velocity of said
stream.
2. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1 and in which valving means is
disposed along said conduit to vary the number of jet ports that
may be opened for exiting fluid stream portions.
Description
The present invention relates to methods of and apparatus for
attenuating and diffusing the sounds normally produced by jet ports
exiting gas or liquid under pressure (hereinafter generically
referred to as "fluid"), being more particularly directed to
jet-port arrays as may be used in valves or other apparatus
requiring the successive exiting of fluid streams from a plurality
of successive jet ports or the like.
The problems attendant upon the quieting or muffling of the sounds
produced by pressurized jet fluid streams have been approached in a
myriad of ways ranging from diffusers, as described, for example,
by U. Ingard in "Attenuation and Regeneration of Sound in Ducts and
Jet Diffusers," appearing, commencing with page 1,202, in the
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 31, Number 9,
September 1959, to the use of deflecting vane structures and vortex
turbulence inhibitors, as described, for example in AIAA Paper No.
68-1023, "Perspective of SST Aircraft Noise Problem," October,
1968, G. S. Schairer et al. and Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol.
44, Part I, 1970, "Vortex Growth in Jets," G. S. Beavers et al.
The use of different types of pressure-varying and valving
mechanisms, air-flow dividers and shutters and the like in other
fluid-flow systems, moreover, is also well known, as illustrated,
for example, in U.S. Letters Patent Nos. 2,893,508 and 3,103,941,
assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
None of these proposals, however, has proven particularly useful
for the specific and unique problems underlying arrays of closely
spaced adjacent jet ports exiting pressurized fluid streams and
requiring sound attenuation and diffusion without having the
proposed sound-reducing apparatus itself give rise to substantial
sound (noise) regeneration While the Ingard publication, supra,
does deal with the use of a perforated disc or a basket diffuser
disposed at the end of an individual jet, and extending from its
peripheral opening, the present invention is particularly concerned
with the pressurized streams of successively different velocities
substantially simultaneously exiting from an array of adjacent jet
ports, as in a valve or other structure wherein the use of such an
individual basket mounted from the periphery of the jet opening for
each port is not feasible. More than this, it was not a priori
predictable that such diffusion is possible over an extended array
of jet ports, particularly of such different-velocity and
escape-pressure distributions along the array.
It has also been proposed to attain relatively quiet valve
operation by controlling or limiting the fluid velocity within the
valve to that of the associated line, or piping multiple disc
structures that divide the incoming flow stream into a series of
smaller flow streams as described, for example, in Bulletin CC-48
of Control Components, Inc. of Los Alamitos, California, entitled
"Self `Drag` Valve." Such an approach, however, requires ancillary
divider structures, and modifying the incoming stream.
Underlying the present invention, however, is the discovery that,
through rather critical positioning, geometry and dimensioning,
appropriate common apertured surface(s) can be used simultaneously
to quiet an array of jet ports without altering the incoming
stream, even over extensive dimensions, and without itself
introducing substantial sound regeneration; and it is to providing
a novel method of and apparatus for effecting such a result that
the present invention has its primary objective.
A further object of the invention is to provide a new and improved
jet muffling apparatus and technique of more general applicability,
as well.
Still another object is to provide a novel quiet valve structure
embodying a plurality of jet ports.
Other and further objects will be explained hereinafter and are
more particularly delineated in the appended claims. In summary,
however, from one of its broader aspects, the invention
contemplates a method of precision pressure-reduction of a fluid
stream while attenuating and diffusing jet-produced sound therein
without substantial sound regeneration during the same, that
comprises, passing a high velocity fluid stream under pressure
along a conduit; exiting the stream into a relatively low velocity
medium at successive jet ports along the conduit as the stream
passes therealong, thereby normally generating noise as the exiting
stream at the successive ports produces jet vortex turbulence in
mixing at relatively high velocity with the relatively low velocity
medium external to the conduit; and producing a controlled gradual
frictional reduction in pressure gradient close to the jet ports
and enveloping all said jet ports in the regions of the
commencement of said mixing. Preferred details, including the
application to quiet valving structures, are hereinafter set
forth.
The invention will now be described with reference to the
accompanying drawings, FIG. 1 of which is a longitudinal section of
the invention in preferred form, shown for illustrative purposes as
applied to a valving system.
FIG. 2 is a fragmentary transverse section of a modified spirally
wound apertured screen portion;
FIG. 3 is a transverse section of a further modification; and
FIG. 4 is a graph plotting the actual improved performance of a
valve constructed in accordance with the embodiment of FIG. 1, as
measured in a reverberant chamber, with the ordinate plotting
one-third octave band sound pressure level (noise) expressed in
decibels (dB) referred to 0.0002 microbar, and the abscissa
plotting one-third octave band center frequency in Hz.
Most prior gas pressure-reducing valves achieve a pressure drop by
passing the gas through a constriction which acts as a sonic
nozzle. While this achieves the pressure reduction goal,
unfortunately, it also generates significant acoustic energy. This
is particularly true if the pressure ratio across the valve exceeds
the critical ratio for the gas; generally about 1.9 for air. Above
a pressure ratio of about 2.5, the acoustic efficiency of the
process is approximately 5 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.3, meaning that
one-half percent of the total gas-stream power is radiated as
acoustic energy. This, moreover, is approximately the same value as
a choked jet engine.
If the pressure were reduced gradually, say by viscous friction,
there would be (theoretically, at least) no noise generated because
the excess energy would be dissipated as heat. This, indeed, would
be an ideal solution, but the volume required to achieve this type
of process is prohibitive for most practical systems and certainly
for valves.
Consider, however, the reduction of pressure that could be achieved
by a sequence of small but finite pressure drops such as might be
produced by passing the gas through a sequence of surfaces or
plates with tiny apertures or through a sequence of apertured
screens. If the total pressure drop is represented by .DELTA.P, the
pressure drop for each of N apertured surfaces or plates is
.DELTA.P/N. If all the pressure drops were absorbed in one
apertured surface or plate, then the noise power generated would
be
Power.apprxeq.K.sub.1 (.DELTA.P).sup.2 ,
where the constant K is dependent upon the mass flow and acoustic
efficiency, K being generally an increasing function of .DELTA.P.
If, however, the pressure is reduced in steps by successive N
apertured surfaces or plates, the acoustic power generated is given
by
Power.apprxeq.NK.sub.N [(.DELTA.P/N)].sup.2 ,
demonstrating that the acoustic power goes down with increasing N,
even if K is considered a constant. The objective of the present
invention in a quiet pressure reduction in a jet-port valve and the
like is thus to achieve pressure reduction by many small steps in a
controlled manner.
Referring to the illustrative jet-port-array valve of FIG. 1, the
illustrative structure is shown comprising a standard pipe tee 1
serving as the valve body and containing an inner conduit tube 2
drilled or otherwise provided with a plurality or array of
successive closely spaced adjacent openings or jet ports 10, 10',
10", 10'", etc., shown longitudinally extending linearly along one
side of the conduit 2. A circumferentially displaced opposite array
of similar jet ports is also shown at 11, 11', 11", 11'", etc.;
with the openings being indeed preferably, though not essentially,
spaced around the circumference of the tube 2. A pressurized fluid
stream is fed into the conduit inlet 2', successive portions of
which exit from the successive jet ports 10, 10', 10", etc. and 11,
11', 11", etc. as the stream passes along the conduit 2. A variably
axially positioned valving piston 5 is provided within the conduit
2 to control the valving action by varying the number of jet ports
that are open for exiting; FIG. 1 showing the jet ports 10'" (and
11'") and beyond, closed off by the valving piston 5. The piston 5
may slide longitudinally or be advanced and retracted by
threads.
In accordance with a preferred form of the invention, the conduit 2
is shown coaxially enveloped or wrapped with successive layers of
fine apertured screen wire 4, 4', 4", etc., the closely spaced
apertures of which are much smaller than the jet port openings. The
fineness of the mesh determines the flow resistance and hence the
pressure drop per screen.
High pressure gas enters the inlet 2' of the conduit 2, and,
depending upon the position of the piston 5, exits through as many
of the adjacent jet ports in the conduit wall as are left open by
the piston 5. The effective opening of the valve structure, of
course, is dependent upon how many jet ports are uncovered. In the
absence of the apertured screen surfaces, the adjacent high
velocity exiting fluid streams will initiate mixing with the zero
or low velocity fluid external to the jet ports 10, 10', etc. (and
11, 11', etc.) in the tee structure 1 and its valve outlet 2",
creating jet vortex turbulence and self-generating noise sounds. In
accordance with the invention, the apertured screen surfaces 4, 4',
etc. are disposed closely enough to the jet ports 10, 10', etc.
(and 11, 11', etc.) and in what would be the commencement of the
mixing region in the vortex potential core to produce gradual and
controlled pressure reduction without permitting such violent
mixing and achieving sub-sonic velocity, eliminating the resulting
vortex-produced noise generation. Exiting or emerging from the jet
ports 10, 10', etc. (11, 11', etc.), the gas passes through the
successive layers of appropriately positioned apertured screens 4,
4', 4", etc., taking a pressure drop at each layer. As the gas
loses pressure, it expands; but since the area of each screen
(being greater than that of the jet ports) increases with
increasing radius, there is maintained an approximately constant,
controlled velocity across each screen layer. Consequently, noise
generation by the diffusing structure is substantially eliminated
or minimal, and the jet-port array valve is muffled.
As an example of the efficacy of the invention, a jet-port array
valving structure about one-half inch in diameter as shown in FIG.
1, was successfully operated with the vastly improved silencing
shown in the graph of FIG. 4. The valve of the invention was found
to be 30 to 50 dB quieter than a conventional similar-dimensioned
gate valve ("prior-art") over a wide frequency range up to about
11,000 Hz one-third octave center band frequency. For this
operation, .DELTA.P was 85 pounds per square inch, with 0.0344
pounds per second; the valve of the invention having an acoustical
efficiency of approximately 10.sup.-.sup.6, as opposed to
10.sup.-.sup.2 for other valves. In addition to its other
advantages, the present invention, moreover, enables valve and
other constructions of easily fabricated and standard parts and
components, and at reduced cost.
There are many alternate configurations which provide viscous,
multi-layer pressure drops of this controlled nature. Instead of
using fine-mesh screens, for example, a coil of perforated metal
sheet may be used, wound in a spiral form as shown in FIG. 2;
preferably with the apertures 20, 20', etc., 21, 21', etc.,
somewhat staggered from spiral layer 40 to layer 40', etc., as
illustrated.
Another alternate configuration is a series of transversely mounted
elements fitted over the conduit 2, FIG. 3; with alternate layers
of fine-aperture screens 30, 30', etc. and impervious metal discs
31, 31', etc.
While the long array of jet openings is illustrated as constituted
of separate successive ports, the elongated long-dimension
effective opening may in some cases be formed of a continuum of jet
ports constituting a single long slot, again enveloped by the
screen or screens. Where successive gradual reduction and sub-sonic
emerging effect is not desired, moreover, the resistive screen will
still serve to prevent vortex mixing and reduce sound
generation.
Further modifications will also occur to those skilled in this art,
and all such are considered to fall within the spirit and scope of
the invention as defined in the appended claims.
* * * * *