U.S. patent number 3,799,054 [Application Number 05/251,216] was granted by the patent office on 1974-03-26 for controlled fragmentation explosive device.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Armament Systems, Inc.. Invention is credited to Edward W. LaRocca.
United States Patent |
3,799,054 |
LaRocca |
March 26, 1974 |
CONTROLLED FRAGMENTATION EXPLOSIVE DEVICE
Abstract
A method and apparatus for controlling the fragmentation of
explosive devices of the type including a cylindrical metallic
fragmentation casing having a longitudinal axis and an explosive
charge therein. The present invention teaches applying to the inner
or outer surface of the casing a longitudinal array of metallic
strips, so that the strips conform to the contour of the
cylindrical casing, the longitudinal axis of the array being
substantially parallel to that of the casing. The density of the
metal from which the strips are formed is greater than that of the
metal from which the casing is formed. The arrays may be in the
form of rectangles, diamonds, or parallel bars.
Inventors: |
LaRocca; Edward W. (Placentia,
CA) |
Assignee: |
Armament Systems, Inc.
(Anaheim, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
22950975 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/251,216 |
Filed: |
May 8, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
102/491;
102/495 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F42B
12/22 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F42B
12/22 (20060101); F42B 12/02 (20060101); F42b
013/48 () |
Field of
Search: |
;102/64,67 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,191,585 |
|
Feb 1958 |
|
FR |
|
1,257,604 |
|
Feb 1961 |
|
FR |
|
Primary Examiner: Pendegrass; Verlin R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hinderstein; Philip M.
Claims
I claim:
1. A controlled fragmentation explosive device comprising:
a cylindrical metallic fragmentation casing having a longitudinal
axis; and
means applied to the inner or outer surface of said casing for
causing fractures in said casing along predetermined lines upon
detonation of said said explosive device thereby forming controlled
fragments from said casing defined by said lines, said means
comprising:
an array of metallic strips positioned along said predetermined
lines so as to conform to the contour of said cylindrical casing,
the density of the metal from which said strips are formed being
greater than that of the metal from which said casing is formed,
said fractures being formed as a result of the interference between
said casing and said metallic strips.
2. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim 1
wherein said array of metallic strips has a longitudinal axis which
is substantially parallel to said longitudinal axis of said
casing.
3. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim 1
wherein said array forms a series of rectangles, the longer sides
of said rectangles being parallel to said longitudinal axis of said
casing.
4. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim 1
wherein said metallic strips are applied to said casing in an
overlapping pattern to form an elongated, diamond-shaped array, the
longitudinal axis of said array being parallel to said longitudinal
axis of said casing.
5. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim 1
wherein said metallic strips are applied to said casing parallel to
the longitudinal axis thereof.
6. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim 1
wherein a first set of metallic strips is applied to said casing
parallel to said longitudinal axis thereof, and wherein a second
set of metallic strips is applied to said casing perpendicular to
said first set of strips, the spacing between said second set of
strips being greater than the spacing between said first set of
strips.
7. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim 1
wherein said metallic strips are applied to the outer surface of
said casing with an adhesive.
8. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim 1
wherein said metallic strips are in the form of thin rods or
wires.
9. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim 1
wherein said metallic strips are in the form of flat ribbons or a
metallic network in the form of a preconfigured sheet, or mesh,
fashioned from flat sheet metal.
10. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim
1 wherein said casing is made of steel and said metallic strips are
made of lead.
11. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim
1 wherein said casing is made of steel and said strips are made of
tungsten.
12. A method of controlling the fragmentation of an explosive
device, including a cylindrical metallic fragmentation casing
having a longitudinal axis and an explosive charge therein,
comprising the step of:
applying to the outer surface of said casing an array of flexible
metallic strips so that the strips conform to the contour of said
cylindrical casing, the density of the metal from which said strips
are formed being greater than that of the metal from which said
casing is formed, said array of strips causing fractures in said
casing along lines defined by said strips upon detonation of said
explosive device thereby forming controlled fragments from said
casing defined by said strips.
13. A method according to claim 12 wherein said strips are applied
to the outer surface of said casing in a rectangular pattern.
14. A method according to claim 12 wherein said strips are applied
to said casing in an overlapping pattern to form an elongated,
diamond-shaped array.
15. A method according to claim 12 wherein said metallic strips are
applied to said casing parallel to the longitudinal axis
thereof.
16. A method according to claim 12 wherein said metallic strips are
applied to said casing with an adhesive.
17. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim
1 wherein said metallic strips are flexible to permit said array to
conform to the contour of said cylindrical casing.
18. A controlled fragmentation explosive device according to claim
1 wherein said metallic strips are in the form of flat, thin,
flexible ribbons having a thickness which is substantially less
than the wall thickness of said cylindrical casing.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to controlled fragmentation explosive
devices and, more particularly, to a method and means for applying
controlled fragmentation to conventional explosive devices.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The general field of the present invention is explosively loaded
weapons generally designed to cause damage to, or to destroy,
equipment, materiel, and/or personnel. Devices of this type
generally consist of a cylindrically shaped metallic casing
containing an explosive composition. Upon detonation of the
explosive composition, the metallic casing ruptures producing
fragments of high velocity and high kinetic energy, which fragments
cause damage and inflict casualties in the vicinity of the
detonation.
In the absence of some method or means for controlling the sizes
and shapes of the fragments produced, it has been found that the
detonation of ordinary cylindrical casings will produce a random
distribution of fragments, both large and small. It is apparent
from kinetic energy considerations that small fragments of low mass
do not possess the same energy as larger fragments traveling at the
same velocity. On the other hand, large fragments present larger
surface areas to the atmosphere, causing increased drag and a
decrease in velocity, with a resultant lower kinetic energy. For
this reason, much attention has been given to methods of producing
fragments of controlled size and weight, so that area and energy
distributions can be optimized.
Prior methods of achieving fragmentation control of ordnance
articles have involved the casting, forging, engraving, embossing,
or otherwise machining of notches or grooves in the inner or outer
surface of the casing. On detonation, stress waves are reflected
from these angular surfaces and, under proper geometrical
conditions, may enhance each other so that extermely high stress
levels are reached, producing controlled fractures.
The notches or grooves may be located on either the external or
internal surfaces of the exposive device and may be
circumferential, longitudinal, or both. Alternatively, the
explosive charge itself may be scored instead of the metallic
surfaces. Furthermore, plastic liners with embossed angular
surfaces have also been used between the explosive charge and the
metallic casing. Finally, it has been proposed to use preformed
fragments bonded together by various matrix materials, such as
resin or adhesives, to form the casing.
The above methods and apparatus are not completely satisfactory for
several resons. In the first instance, many of the machining
methods for forming grooves in the casing are difficult and
relatively expensive. In addition, the grooved casings often make
the structures unable to withstand the high stresses of
acceleration caused by firing of the projectile. Furthermore, none
of the methods outlined above can be applied to stockpiles live
munitions that have explosive contents. In other words, there
presently are stockpiles of explosive devices which were
manufactured prior to the establishment of controlled fragmentation
requirements. Heretofore, in order to apply the above controlled
fragmentation methods to the stockpiled devices, it has been
necessary to completely disarm them by removal of the explosive
charges.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, these problems of the prior art
are solved by providing a novel controlled fragmentation explosive
device. With the present invention, a controlled fragmentation
explosive device may be manufactured without the difficult and
expensive machining operations discussed previously. In addition,
the present explosive device does not interfere in any way with the
structure of the metallic casing thereby permitting the casing to
retain its strength in the presence of high stress levels. Finally,
the present method and apparatus may be readily applied to
stockpiled explosive devices to control the fragmentation thereof,
without disarming or removing the explosive charges therefrom.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a
controlled fragmentation explosive device.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method
and means for controlling fragmentation in an explosive device
which eliminates the necessity for notches or grooves machined into
the device's liner or body.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a
controlled fragmentation explosive device which does not affect the
strength of the metallic casing.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a method
for controlling the fragmentation of existing explosive devices
possessing no provision for fragment control.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide
explosive devices having improved characteristics of predictable
and controlled fragmentation upon explosion or other impulse
loading.
Still other objects, features, and attendant advantages of the
present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art
from a reading of the following detailed description of the
preferred embodiments constructed in accordance therewith, taken in
conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like numerals
designate like parts in the several figures and wherein:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 are plan views of first, second, and third
embodiments, respectively, of controlled fragmentation explosive
devices constructed according to the teachings of the present
invention; and
FIG. 4 is a plan view of a portion of a sheet of material showing a
method of applying the present invention to metallic casings.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring now to the drawings and, more particularly, to FIGS. 1-3
thereof, there is shown portions of controlled fragmentation
explosive devices, generally designated 10, 20, and 30,
respectively. Each of explosive devices 10, 20, and 30 includes a
generally cylindrical, metallic fragmentation casing 11 having a
longitudinal axis 12 and an explosive charge 13. Casing 11 and
charge 13 are the same as in conventional explosive devices, except
that the inner and outer surfaces of casing 11 are entirely
smooth.
Applied to the outer surface of casing 11 is an array of flexible
metallic strips 14. Strips 14 may be in the form of wire or rods
having a circular or other cross-section, or they may be in the
form of flat ribbons so as to permit strips 14 to conform to the
contour of casing 11. In any event, it is necessary that the
density of the metal from which strips 14 are formed be greater
than that of the metal from which casing 11 is formed. If the
density of the metal of strips 14 is equal to or less than that of
casing 11, controlled fragmentation will not result. For example,
if casing 11 is made from steel, having a density of 0.28
lb./in..sup.3, it is possible to use any metal for strips 14 which
has a density greater than that value. Therefore, it is possible to
use lead for strips 14 since lead has a density of 0.41
lb./in..sup.3. Excellent results have been achieved with a steel
casing and with strips 14 made of tungsten which has a density of
0.7 lb./in..sup.3.
Strips 14 may be applied to casing 11 with any suitable adhesive.
For example, strips 14 may be applied with glue or an epoxy
compound. On the other hand, strips 14 would not be welded to
casing 11. In other words, although strips 14 are adhered to casing
11, the bond strength between casing 11 and strips 14 is relatively
low so that they act as independent structures.
As shown in FIG. 4, strips 14 may be adhered to the front side of a
sheet of pressure-sensitive paper, plastic, or cloth 40, the back
side of sheet 40 having an adhesive thereon. Lengths of removable
paper 41 may be positioned in a conventional manner in contact with
the back side of sheet 40 to prevent the unintentional adherence
thereof. However, when it is desired to attach sheet 40 and strips
14 to the outside of a casing, paper 41 may be removed to permit
ready adherence and sheet 40 may be readily wrapped around casing
11.
Strips 14 are applied to the outer surface of casing 11 in an array
having the desired geometrical shape. For example, in the
embodiment of FIG. 1, strips 14 are applied in a diamond-shaped
array. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, a first set of metallic strips
14 is applied to the outer surface of casing 11, parallel to axis
12, and a second set of metallic strips 14 is applied to the outer
surface of casing 11, perpendicular to the first set of strips,
thus forming a rectangular array. Finally, in the embodiment of
FIG. 3, metallic strips 14 are applied to the surface of casing 11
parallel to longitudinal axis 12.
It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that considerable
latitude exists in the dimensions of the arrays shown in FIGS. 1-3
and that the geometrical configurations are not limited to the
designs shown. On the other hand, it is known that when a
cylindrical casing is detonated, there is a tendency for the casing
to form longitudinal fragments. This being the case, the pattern of
strips 14 is preferably adjusted to enhance this natural
fragmentation pattern. For this reason, and in the case of
explosive device 10, the length "1" of the individual diamonds is
greater than the width "w" thereof. In the case of explosive device
20, the spacing "x" between the longitudinal metallic strips 14 is
less than the spacing "y" between the lateral strips. Other
geometrical shapes and dimensions will be apparent to those skilled
in the art.
The configuration of the array of metallic strips 14 will obviously
affect the shape of the fragments. The shape of many of the
fragments caused by explosive device 10 will be generally
diamond-shaped, having a length "l" and a width "w." The shape of
many of the fragments in the case of explosive device 20 will be
rectangular, having a width "x" and a length "y" or an integral
multiple of "y." Finally, the shape of the fragments in the case of
explosive device 30 will be elongated strips.
Explosive devices 10, 20, and 30 may be originally constructed with
strips 14 thereon having any of the configurations shown in FIGS.
1-3. On the other hand, the present invention is ideally suited for
application to stockpiled explosive devices which were manufactured
prior to the establishment of controlled fragmentation
requirements. More specifically, since metal strips 14 are simply
applied to the outer surface of an explosive device with any
suitable adhesive, such strips may be readily applied to existing
projectiles without disarming or removing the explosive charges
therefrom.
In the embodiments of FIGS. 1-3, strips 14 have been applied to the
outer surface of case 11 since this is the preferred embodiment and
this is the only manner in which strips can be applied to existing
explosive devices without disarming them. However, in new explosive
devices, strips 14 may be applied to the inner surface of casing
11.
It can therefore be seen that in accordance with the present
invention, there is provided a method and apparatus for use in
controlled fragmentation explosive devices which eliminates the
difficult and expensive machine operations used previously. In
addition, metallic strips 14 do not interfere in any way with the
structure of metallic casing 11 thereby permitting casing 11 to
retain its strength in the presence of high stress levels. Finally,
the present method and apparatus may be readily applied to
stockpiled explosive devices to control the fragmentation thereof
without disarming or removing the explosive charges therefrom.
While the invention has been described with respect to the
preferred physical embodiments constructed in accordance therewith,
it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various
modifications and improvements may be made without departing from
the scope and the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be
understood that the invention is not to be limited by the specific
illustrative embodiments, but only by the scope of the appended
claims.
* * * * *