U.S. patent number 3,797,392 [Application Number 05/331,671] was granted by the patent office on 1974-03-19 for reversible sensitization of liquid explosives.
Invention is credited to Robert E. Eckels.
United States Patent |
3,797,392 |
Eckels |
March 19, 1974 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
REVERSIBLE SENSITIZATION OF LIQUID EXPLOSIVES
Abstract
Microspheres spacially suspended in a liquid, not normally
considered an explosive, cause a propagating detonation in the
liquid, and the liquid is reversed to non-explosive configuration
by removal of the microspheres. The microspheres are prepositioned
in a predetermined quantity in a porous suspending medium, the
quantity being sufficient to cause an overdrive of velocity of
chemical reaction to detonate the liquid. The suspending medium
with the microspheres may be inserted or withdrawn as desired from
the liquid, whereby the liquid with the included medium and
microspheres will detonate and the liquid without the medium and
microspheres will not detonate.
Inventors: |
Eckels; Robert E. (Golden,
CO) |
Family
ID: |
23294876 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/331,671 |
Filed: |
February 12, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
102/314; 149/2;
149/89; 149/110 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C06B
47/00 (20130101); C06B 23/003 (20130101); F42B
3/00 (20130101); F42D 5/00 (20130101); C06B
25/36 (20130101); Y10S 149/11 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F42D
5/00 (20060101); C06B 23/00 (20060101); C06B
47/00 (20060101); F42B 3/00 (20060101); C06B
25/00 (20060101); C06B 25/36 (20060101); F42b
003/00 (); F42d 001/00 (); F42d 005/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;102/22-24,27,28
;149/2,17,89,110 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Pendegrass; Verlin R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Law; Richard D.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A reversible explosive system sensitive to a number 6 cap
comprising
a. a container,
b. a body of a normally non-sensitive liquid potential explosive in
an amount sufficient to produce a diameter in excess of about such
liquid's critical diameter in said container, and
c. a sensitizer-booster including a permeable body of a size to
telescope in said container and absorb at least some of said
liquid, and from about 3 weight percent to 33 weight percent of
hearth material in relation to the quantity of absorbed liquid
dispersed throughout said permeable body, said permeable body being
arranged to be inserted into and withdrawn from said liquid for
desensitizing the same and be relieved of its absorbed liquid for
desensitizing said permeable body.
2. A reversible explosive system according to claim 1 wherein said
permeable body is a loose roll of cotton.
3. A reversible explosive system according to claim 1 wherein said
permeable body is an open cell, foamed synthetic resin.
4. A reversible explosive system according to claim 3 wherein said
foamed synthetic resin is a polyurethane.
5. A reversible explosive system according to claim 1 wherein said
hearth material is glass microspheres.
6. A reversible explosive system according to claim 1 wherein said
hearth material is ceramic microspheres.
7. A reversible explosive system according to claim 1 wherein said
hearth material is silicon grit.
8. A reversible explosive system according to claim 1 wherein said
hearth material is ground closed cell foam glass.
9. A reversible explosive system according to claim 1 wherein said
liquid is nitromethane in a large excess of the amount absorbed by
said porous body and at about 3 weight percent of ceramic
microspheres are supported in said porous body whereby to overdrive
the detonation in said nitromethane to produce a propagated
detonation throughout the nitromethane in excess of that described
in said porous body.
10. A reversible explosive system according to claim 1 wherein said
body of a normally non-sensitive liquid is substantially greater
than the quantity of liquid absorbed by said porous body.
11. A reversible explosive system according to claim 1 wherein said
permeable body is a closed cell body having sufficient cells
ruptured to provide the necessary hearth material for said
detonation.
12. A method of propagating detonation throughout the body of a
liquid explosive in which the velocity of detonation is overdriven
by at least about 10 percent excess over normal steady state
velocity in the liquid, comprising
forming a small body of explosive liquid having a diameter at least
as great as its critical length;
forming a liquid explosive absorbing carrier for from 3 to 33
weight percent of spaced hearths to weight of said small body of
liquid explosive, which carrier is capable of absorbing said small
body of liquid explosive;
placing said carrier with said spaced hearths in a large body of
said liquid explosive; and detonating said small body of liquid
explosive in said carrier in said large body of said liquid
explosive to cause propagation of detonation throughout said large
body of liquid explosive.
13. A method according to claim 12 wherein said liquid is
nitromethane.
14. A method according to claim 13 wherein said hearths are 4-14
weight percent of glass microspheres.
15. A method according to claim 13 wherein said hearths are 5-11
weight percent of ceramic microspheres.
16. A method of autosterilizing a liquid explosive comprising:
forming a booster for said liquid explosive containing a sufficient
quantity of hearths in spaced relation to sensitize said liquid
explosive to detonate, and being formed of a material which absorbs
said liquid explosive and dissolves therein; and placing said
booster in a body of said liquid explosive, whereby if not
detonated within the solubility time of dissolution of said
material in said liquid explosive, said spaced hearths are released
from their sensitizing spaced relation.
17. A method of sensitizing a liquid explosive comprising
forming a body of a closed cell, rigid foam; subjecting said body
of foam to fluid pressure at a sufficient pressure and for a
sufficient time to rupture sufficient cells to absorb an amount of
liquid explosive sufficient to form a critical diameter and
critical length body of liquid explosive and provide sufficient
edges of ruptured cells acting as hearths to sensitize the absorbed
liquid;
placing said foam body in a body of liquid explosive, and then
detonating said foam body while in said liquid explosive.
18. A method according to claim 17 wherein said rigid foam is a
foamed insulating glass.
19. A method according to claim 17 wherein said liquid explosive is
nitromethane.
20. A method according to claim 19 wherein said foam is foamed
insulating glass having a 2-inch length and 2-inch diameter,
ruptured at about 400 psi.
Description
This application is based on the invention set out in Disclosure
Document No. 01137, filed in the United States Patent Office June
2, 1972. This application is, also, based in part on Disclosure
Document No. 12792, filed Aug. 17, 1972, in the United States
Patent Office.
INVENTION FIELD
This invention relates to a means by which the sensitivity to
denotation of liquids, which can be made to detonate, can be
increased by the insertion of a physical additive sensitizer to
such liquid, and which added sensitizer can be readily and quickly
manually removed leaving the liquid essentially as it was prior to
the adding of the sensitizer.
DEFINITIONS
Burning or combustion is an oxidation which can take place with
ordinary combustibles (such as wood, coal, paper, etc.) but, also,
such propellants pyrotechnics, etc. spread out and are not
confined. The rate of burning of the propellants and pyrotechnics
is between a few millimeters and a few centimeters per second.
A deflagration is an oxidation having a rate of burning (or
velocity) of about 1000 meters per second. It has a velocity
between "combustion" and a "low-order detonation" which is called
an "explosion."
An "explosion" is a chemical reaction or change of state which is
effected in an exceedingly short space of time with the generation
of a high temperature and generally a large quantity of gas. It
produces a shock wave in the surrounding medium, MIL-STD-444. An
explosion is a milder form of detonation.
Detonation is defined as "an exothermic chemical reaction that
propagates with such rapidity that the rate of advance of the
reaction zone into unreacted material exceeds the velocity of sound
in the unreacted material, that is, the advancing reaction zone is
preceded by a shock wave." When this rate of advance attains such a
value that it will continue without diminution through the
unreacted material, it is termed a stable detonation velocity. When
the detonation rate is equal to or greater than the stable
detonation velocity of the explosive, the reaction is termed a
high-order detonation. When the detonation rate is lower than the
stable detonation velocity of the explosive, the reaction is termed
a low-order detonation or "explosion." Solid and liquid explosives
which propagate at velocities above 3500-4000 meters per second are
usually considered detonating explosives.
The current theory of shock and detonation waves is largely founded
on the work of Chapman-Jouguet and R. Becker. The Treatment of
sustained detonation, often called the Chapman-Jouquet Theory is
based on four assumptions: 1. The detonation approaches the steady
state, 2. The flow is laminar and one-dimensional, 3. The
detonation products approach a state of chemical equilibrium some
distance behind the detonation front; and 4. The detonation
velocity is calculated using equations for conservation of mass,
momentum and energy.
The critical-charge diameter of a liquid is that at which the
attenuating detonation front will not be restored by the wave
traveling over the compressed explosive. If the liquid is
considered in a tubular container, if the diameter of the container
is less than the critical charge diameter, the detonation will
cease. If the diameter is larger than the critical one, an outward
detonation wave will arise in a certain period of time after
transition and the explosive will detonate in the larger volume.
For nitromethane this is about 18 mm by experiment and about 14.3
mm. by calculation. The critical diameter for liquid TNT is about
62 mm. The shock loading needed to initiate nitromethane is on the
order of 86 to 90 kilobars.
The above definitions are taken from the Encyclopedia of Explosives
and Relates Items, Vol. 4, Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, New Jersey,
1969.
Steady State propagation of detonation is ideal or non-ideal. The
minimum steady state detonating velocity is, for a particular
confinement, attained at the Critical Diameter d below which steady
detonation will not propagate. This minimum steady propagating
velocity would be nonideal by its definition. As the diameter is
increased to larger sized cylinders the steady state velocity
increases and it approaches closely the ideal state of steady
velocity. These parameters vary from one explosive to another and
with the strength and materials of the confining walls of the
cylinder holding the explosive.
The sensitizer for reversible use in explosives, according to the
present invention, should have a degree of applicability to any
fluid explosive, gaseous, liquid, or flowable slurry. However, of
chief concern to the invention are liquid explosives. From among
liquid explosives the sensitizer may be used to increase
sensitivity of non-detonator-cap sensitive or detonator-cap
sensitive explosives, in the later case being effective as a
booster. However, of prime importance to this invention is the
former case of non-detonator-cap sensitive liquids which when
joined with the means of this invention can be made to detonate, or
explode, from the detonation of a No. 6 cap. These liquids might be
further defined a liquid capable of sustaining detonation, after it
is initiated at or above a characteristic velocity, being at least
its lowest steady state velocity and provided that its diameter
normal to the axis of propagation is at least its critical
diameter. The non-detonator-cap sensitive liquids of the
potentially explosive liquids described can usually be initiated
with the impetus from powerful booster charges.
DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART
Sprengel types of explosives, consisting of two or more chemicals
otherwise non-explosive, which when mixed become detonable, have
been known for many years. Various explosive chemical mixtures
including nitroalkanes, though more recent, are well known as
non-explosives until mixed when they become very effective as
detonable explosives from either a blasting cap or booster charge.
Several other binary and tertiary chemical mixtures are explosives
after mixing and known to the art. However, all of these, which
might be classified as Sprengel type explosive mixtures, have the
common disadvantage of irreversibility and often involve the
handling of noxious chemicals. In addition, some of the mixtures
deteriorate with the passing of time. There has been a continuing
need for a two or more part explosive system, which is effectively
completely reversible, to both include the advantages of the
Sprengel approach, yet be able to return to the "safe" starting
condition.
U. S. Pat. No. 2,298,255, granted Oct. 6, 1942, to N. M. Hopkins,
discloses numerous liquid mixtures for explosives and a means for
mixing them to establish their greater sensitivity. Their
sensitization is in fact chemical.
U. S. Pat. No. 3,338,165, granted Aug. 29, 1967, to J. J. Minnick,
discloses a non-reversible means of sensitizing nitromethane by the
use of phenol-formaldehyde microspheres, "Microballoons," or
microspheres of urea-formaldehyde, which are uniformly dispersed in
a gel. This disclosure does not show a means where such spheres
have been effectively incorporated in other than the gelled
composition, which gel, if not included, will allow the balloons to
separate by floatation, and become insensitive to detonation. This
patent, also, mentions for the resin microspheres certain
percentages that are related to the weight of the "composition"
which includes the mass of the nitromethane plus the mass of the
gelling agent plus the weight of the microspheres. This produces a
cumbersome calculation at best, and conceivably non-detonable in
some of the compositions shown. Each defined composition is clearly
described as a uniform dispersion of such microspheres in a gel.
This disclosure does not identify whether or not it may be
applicable to potential explosive liquids other than nitromethane.
Excepting the broad claim of resin balloons to sensitize
nitromethane (which upon simple introduction into the liquid would
separate to a non-detonable, by usual means, mixture) all of the
other claims of this patent depict a uniform distribution of the
resin balloons in a gel.
U. S. Pat. No. 3,687,076, granted Aug. 29, 1972, to J.E. Friant et
al., discloses a packaging means for non-explosive liquids and
solids which can be field mixed to a detonator sensitivity useful
as an explosive.
Numerous other two or more part chemical mixing packages and
systems for sensitization are described both in the literature and
in patents; however, none of these offer a means of reversing the
entire sensitization once it has been accomplished.
In about 1952, F. P. Bowden and A. Yoffe described in some detail
theories of localized centers of initiation of detonation as a part
of the detonation process. This has been described by numerous
others and in the Russian literature.
According to one line of thinking, the hypothesis of local heating,
which appears in chemical explosives when under the influence of
applied energy, explains the excitation of the chemicals to
explosion, or detonation. These local heating areas are called
variously "hearths," "energy epicenters," "hot spots," and the
like. As the prevalence of these heat centers increases in an
explosive, the gross effect is an increase in reaction to eventual
explosion, and an increase in the potential heat centers is
reflected as an increase in the sensitivity to detonation for such
an explosive, up to a point of diminishing returns from attenuating
effects of very large quantities. Two of the means by which these
heat centers may be developed involve heat from friction involving
alien hard particles in the explosive and heating during very rapid
compression of bubbles of air, gas, or uncondensed vapor within the
liquid.
The heating from friction may be produced by contact of particles
in motion from shock causing flow of a liquid explosive. Examples
of impurities found useful for this mechanism are sand and
carborundum grit and like materials having fusion temperatures well
above about 400.degree.C., and having low thermal conductivity. One
version of this theory is that the friction in heating appears to
be concentrated on jagged points of irregular surfaces of the
foreign particles in a manner great enough to cause local
decomposition from thermal initiated reaction, in turn causing
local shock waves, in turn encouraging added friction and so on
until explosion of the entire liquid.
Similarly, adiabatic heating caused by compression of tiny gas
bubbles causes thermal decomposition reactions which initiate shock
waves, hence compressing further gas bubbles and so on until
complete explosion.
Both of these mechanisms seem to have proof from numerous
investigators. One of the major points is at least made that shock
interactions, usually from external initiating sources, cause
localized macro pressures to thereby develop very high temperatures
in the liquid's proximity to any variations in homogeneity. The
heat centers may propagate, or die out, depending on their size and
relative quantity and effect upon the liquid chemicals
involved.
In various amounts it has been shown that glass Microballoons,
silicon carbide grit, and several different air entraining
materials, as well as resin microspheres can increase sensitivity
to detonation of most explosives. Microspheres, and other
inhomogeneities, are added regularly to many of the slurry
explosives now being regularly used to adjust their sensitivity to
a desired level, usually high enough for relative ease of
initiation.
D. W. Woodhead and H. Titman have show the effect of relatively
small channels in the path of detonation of an explosive to
increase the velocity of detonation of some explosives. This
increase in detonation velocity is caused by the gas in the channel
being driven forward in a compressed layer. From time
considerations alone a higher velocity would release a higher
energy.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
If the forementioned microspheres are spacially located in a
relatively inhomogeneous fashion, and being adequate in numbers, it
is believed certain channel effects take place to cause an increase
in velocity along with the effects enjoyed by the other mechanisms
of friction and adiabatic heating. Another mechanism hypothesized
with relation to microspheres of gas, which may be concurrently
effective with these other mechanisms, is one of jets where the
detonation front is effective against the near side of the sphere
in the fashion of a shaped charge to initiate a tiny but high
energy jet emitting from the opposite side of the sphere. The
channel effect would not normally be expected from a uniform
distribution of microspheres nor from very great concentrations of
such spheres due to attenuating effects. Very small concentrations
of such spheres should not effect channels.
This is to say, it is possible to design a means to include heat
centers, which can be placed in a liquid, such as nitromethane, and
which can cause the "overdriving" of the velocity of detonation of
nitromethane upon initiation with a No. 6 detonator cap placed in
the sensitizer means, in a manner that the overdriven nitromethane
will propagate in the otherwise unsensitized nitromethane. And more
important, for a considerable distance beyond the sensitizer means
causing the overdriving mechanism, the nitromethane will be in a
state of high compression and very high velocity and energy
dispensation, being equivalent to a new and extremely powerful
explosive for that time frame prior to its eventual subsidence to
its normal detonating velocity.
In a similar manner, it is possible to sensitize any potential
detonable liquid, or liquid mixture, and it is possible to
similarly initiate a liquid phase which phases into a liquid
flushed oxidizer salt, such as, nitromethane and ammonium nitrate,
with the sensitizer means in its "overdriving" configuration,
followed by nitromethane, unsensitized, followed by nitromethane
flushed ammonium nitrate. In this illustration the entirety should
detonate.
The overdriven detonation or sustained detonation described might
be properly described as "autocatalytic," at least through that
portion of the detonation where the sensitizer is actually
involved. Being autocatalytic, it is an explosive reaction, which
is accelerated by the action of the sensitizer provided with a rate
of reaction increasing until it reaches a stable velocity which
incorporates the effects of the inhomogeneities provided. Credited
to Mr. R. Carl, it is theorized, the rate of detonation increases
more rapidly with increase of density in an insensitive rather than
in a sensitive explosive. With a certain dampening effect to any
detonation by any liquid, it then becomes desirable to increase the
density of a liquid explosive both to increase its detonating
velocity and assure its sensitivity to detonation. According to the
theory considered, it is believed that the capability is available
to increase the density of liquid explosives. It may be theorized
that sensitization of the mixtures of this invention might be
applicable to explosive materials of gases, desensitized explosive
liquids, difficult to detonate explosive liquids, and in variations
to initiation adequate for the sensitized volume only to the
initiation of overdriving sufficient to initiate the propagation of
detonation in an unsensitized fluid.
Among liquids potentially useful with this invention for explosives
are many which are cap sensitive but which can be moderated with
desensitizers to not detonate from a No. 6 cap but sensitized to a
number 6 cap using the methods of this invention. Some of those
listed above are not cap sensitive without any desensitizing.
Examples of potentially explosive liquids are: Singular chemical
systems -- Nitroglycerine, Ethylene Glycol Dinitrate, Ethyl
Nitrate, Methyl Nitrate, all of which are considered cap sensitive.
Nitromethane, dinitromethane, tetranitromethane, dinitropropane,
--the first three of which when pure are not considered cap
sensitive.
Binary chemical explosive systems -- (Sprengel explosives)
87.5/12.5 Tetranitromethane/Benzene, Nitromethane plus 5% Ethylene
Diamine, 72/28 Nitric Acid/Benzene, 70/30 Nitric Acid/Methylol,
Liquid Oxygen plus a stoichiometric fuel, Mixtures of
Nitroparaffins with a Chemical Sensitizer, all of which are
considered cap sensitive. Nitromethane plus a chemical desensitizer
such as 2% Benzene, any of singular chemical explosive liquids
which are cap sensitive plus chemical desensitizing. -- such as
70/30 Methyl Nitrate/Methyl Alcohol, -- such mixtures that are
insensitive by design to the impulse of a No. 6 detonator cap may
be mixed to greater or lesser sensitivity to be suited to a use or
storage need.
Tertiary chemical explosive systems -- Dithekite (any of several
mixtures being ratios of Nitric Acid/NitroBenzene/Water i.e.,
Dithekite 13 is 63/24/13), these can be formed for cap sensitivity
and reduced from sensitivity by including a diluent greater amount
of nitrobenzene or nitric acid staying inside the miscible phases
of the three phase diagram.
Hydrogen Peroxide/Water/(Organic substances such as ethanol) is a
family of explosives providing rates from about 750 to 7,000 m/sec
when initiated with a booster and a detonating cap. These
explosives were investigated by Shanley and Greenspan and the
mixtures can be constructed onto triangular phase diagrams which
identify detonation regions.
It is an object of this invention to provide a means for
mechanically sensitizing a liquid explosive, such as nitromethane,
to detonate when subject to the energy release of a No. 6 detonator
cap, or other source.
Another object of this invention is to provide a means for
mechanically sensitizing a liquid explosive and to be able to
remove a mechanical sensitizing means from a potentially explosive
liquid, restoring it to insensitivity from detonator cap
sensitivity, by simply withdrawing such means from it.
Another object of this invention is to provide a means for
mechanically sensitizing potentially explosive liquids and then
desensitize such potentially explosive liquids any number of times
until ready to detonate them or return such liquids for storage or
transport as non-explosive liquids.
A further object of this invention is to provide a means to ship
innocuous chemicals and mechanical components to any place, not
requiring explosive storage or shipment and eventually requiring
only a detonator cap or detonator cord to initiate detonation, all,
to the placation of foreign and domestic governmental bodies.
It is still another object of this invention to provide a means
wherein explosive devices, such as shaped charges, may be preloaded
with non-explosives and reversibly armed for detonation or storage
at will.
It is another object of this invention to reversibly sensitize a
portion of a potentially explosive liquid, such as nitromethane, in
a manner that the resulting detonation rate and energy release,
when detonated, is sufficient to propagate detonation in the
otherwise untreated liquid where above its critical detonating
diameter minimums.
An additional object of this invention is to disperse either gas
containing or non-gaseous micro-inhomogeneities in a
mini-irregular, but overall regular manner in a potentially
explosive fluid to sensitize it to detonation from a -6 blasting
cap or similar detonating charge.
It is a still further object of this invention to provide a means
for a one time reversible sensitizing of a potentially explosive
liquid providing a time dependent means of autosterilization.
A further object of this invention is to accomplish the above and
other objectives in an improved and economic manner to reduce
explosive use costs while increasing safety and convenience;
additional objects may be evident in the course of the further
discussion.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention may be
readily ascertained by reference to the following description and
appended illustrations, in which:
FIG. 1 is a graph of a plot of quantity of hearth material per
cubic inch of cotton roll against the mass percent of hearth
material to liquid nitromethane; and
FIG. 2 is a graph of a plot of quantity of hearth materials per cc
of prefoamed chemicals against the mass percentage of hearth
materials to nitromethane.
In general, the present invention pertains to the discovery of a
reversible means of increasing sensitivity to detonation of
potential liquid explosives, such as nitromethane, by intimately
dispersing hearth materials such as Microballoons, glass
microspheres, ceramic microspheres, and/or silicon carbide grit in
the liquid as in a roll of thin strip cotton, or other equivalent
highly porous and permeable material. Such material requires
mechanical integrity when placed in a small porous sack, otherwise
permeably bound, or in an open cell plastic body, preferably a
non-rigid, foam insoluble in the liquid explosive involved. The
cotton roll holds the inhomogeneities in place by friction. The
intimate dispersion is accomplished in a manner that spacial
placing of the inhomogeneities includes a consistency of
irregularities in a mini-view (small localities), such as
observable under a high powered magnifying glass.
In a plastic foam, such as polyurethane open cell foam, the
inhomogeneities are actually incorporated into the thin foam
webbing and strands. More webbing is evident with fewer strands
than without the inclusions.
Importantly, adequate amounts, with respect to percentage of
explosive liquid, of the microspheres are needed in order to
accomplish overdriving the detonation velocity to provide
propagation throughout the liquid where desired. It has been noted
that minor amounts, lower percentages, of microspheres added to
urethane foams have given detonation (or no detonation) of a
non-definitive character, even using larger impetus than a No. 6
cap. A similar effect has been noted with urethane foams with no
inhomogeneities added. In a like manner, the cotton rolls without
inhomogeneities did not define a means of sensitization.
Various levels of sensitizing are possible depending on percentages
of hearth sources used and their dispersion. In some sensitizer
mixes, the detonation around the heat centers (hearths) actually
slows and stops. In some, it reaches useful levels but continues
only in the region of suspended particles, and is therefore of
limited use. But in others, the mix gives rates and energy release
high enough to continue detonation in the otherwise untreated
liquid depending on the minimum detonating character of the
particular material.
The following examples show the operation of the invention,
primarily using nitromethane (NM) as the liquid potential explosive
and microspheres (mb).
EXAMPLE I
A small container, formed of plastic, metal or the like, is
partially filled with about 46 cc of nitromethane. A strip of
cotton is sprinkled with about 3 weight percent of glass
microspheres, and then rolled into a small cylinder. This cylinder
is lightly tied into the roll and then inserted into the liquid
nitromethane. The container is placed on a 1/2 inch steel disc,
about 8 inches in diameter on test firing range. An electrically
fired No. 6 cap is inserted in the cotton roll, and the lead wires
attached. The cap is detonated electrically, and the results of the
subsequent detonation examined. The result is shown in the graph of
FIG. 1 and point number 5 in the following Table I. Other examples
are shown in the Table, including the quantity of liquid
nitromethane, the type of carrier for the hearth, the type of
hearth and result.
The size of the booster for a particular explosive should be at
least the diameter of the liquid explosive's Critical Diameter at
the temperature and confinement selected. And the Length should be
its Critical Length or greater; however, as a practical matter if
the length is not less than about three times the Critical Diameter
it will usually be greater than the Critical Length. In the case of
NM the Critical Length is less than this somewhat. Since Critical
Length is largely experimentally determined for a particular
explosive and conditions and this may be altered by the type of
impetus, it probably should be avoided in the application -- the
more important parameter being the Critical Diameter.
The foam used for the graph of FIG. 2 is a polyurethane sold by
Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan under the tradename of
CPR-2036. This is sold as a two component system, used on a 50/50
ratio to form a lightweight, open cell foam. ##SPC1##
The glass microspheres used had an average of 0.28 gm/cc particle
density and had sizes in the range of about 10 to 300 microns. The
ceramic microspheres had a particle density of about 0.6 gm/cc and
sizes from about 60 to 35 micron. From the above tests it is
evident that sensitizing to detonation is possible for a range of
from about 3 1/2 to 30 percent for glass microspheres and about 3
to 33 percent for the ceramic microspheres, if sensitizing NM. It
is most important that from about 6 to over 11 percent by weight of
ceramic microspheres to weight of nitromethane indicates to
initiate detonation with such force as to initiate beyond the
sensitizer area (liquid in the carrier) into stock nitromethane
with continuing propagation. Similar effects are evident in the
range of 3.5 to 14 percent of glass microspheres being nearly as
effective. Though higher percentages of each should, also, cause
this effect, it begins to engage unfavorable economics.
Ammonium Nitrate (AN) added to the sensitizers did not enhance the
effectiveness, though detonation was achieved in some instances. On
the other hand in initiating into AN from the overdriven velocity
liquid NM where the AN is flushed with NM initiates very well,
detonating still above the velocity usual to NM for the distance
considered, in the extension described.
It can be reasonably inferred that 0.1 to about 10 percent of
Silicon Carbide grit incorporated into a suitable inhomogeneous
matrix will sensitize NM to detonation with a No. 6 cap.
Using larger caps, such as a No. 8 cap with about 140 percent as
much loading as a No. 6 cap, or boosters of even greater dimensions
can allow each level of performance to be greater, to that point
where NM can be initiated from boosters alone, if large enough.
However, the No. 6 cap is widely available and the utility of my
invention requires detonation be available to this small size, if
using nitromethane.
It is recognized that silica flour, ground balsam, fired ceramic
flour, and other such materials providing hearths can be used with
or without microspheres.
While there are many liquid explosives and liquid explosive
mixtures which can be used with such a reversible means according
to the invention, specifically they include: desensitized
nitroglycerin and other nitric acid esters, nitroalkanes, including
nitromethane and mixtures of nitroalkanes, liquid oxygen (LOX)
liquid explosive mixtures, Sprengel type explosive mixtures, EGDN,
isopropyl nitrate, Dithekite, hydrazine or hydrazine nitrate
containing explosives, etc.
The foams useful for the invention should be insoluble in the
liquid for the potential explosive and have open pores. These foams
should maintain foaming capability and structural integrity after
addition of necessary extraneous inhomogeneities (microspheres,
etc.) to either the foam precusor mix or one of the mix components.
Several inorganic foams can be substituted in these sensitizers but
open cell resilient plastic foams, such as polyurethane foam, seem
to offer advantages in handling.
In suspending by friction, such as in rolls or folds, materials
with merit include cotton, loose woven materials as felts and
gauzes, metal gauzes, rock wool, etc. Glass fiber materials can
have some application; however, glass wool rolls would better
retain the hearths.
It has been found impractical, if not impossible, to relate the
percentage amount of microspheres, for instance, to the amount of
materials to be foamed. This parameter is actually quite
insignificant for the reason that mixing a predetermined amount of
microspheres with a known amount of foamable chemicals, once foamed
may have different volumes, depending not only on temperature,
humidity, and actual chemical variations, but on means of mixing,
order for mixing, vibration during set, and numerous other factors.
Accordingly, this would change the percentage of heat centers
relative to the gross volume of explosive liquid. It has been found
that the only means to adequately control the degree of
sensitization attained from these inhomogeneities is to control the
percentage by weight of such inhomogeneities as microspheres used
to the weight of liquid explosive, such as nitromethane, being
sensitized, whether these heat centers are included in a flexible
open cell plastic foam or rolled in a roll of cotton to give a
mini-non-conformity to their distribution within the sensitizing
volume.
It has been found that one unique source of these heat centers,
suitable for inclusion in the open cell plastic foam, is ground
closed cell foam glass, Foamglas. This unique material provides the
characteristics of both microspheres, having minute bubbles in the
particles, and grit or other sharp edged material. I have found
that this material is effective, suspended in similar amounts, as
effective quantities of microspheres where the material is rough
ground to only 10 percent passing a 75 micron particle size.
In sensitizing liquid explosives to detonation from a No. 6 cap,
for a liquid which is not otherwise this sensitive, it is found
that certain rigid closed cell foams, such as the glass insulating
foam made by Pittsburgh-Corning, identified as Foamglas, can, with
alteration, be made to provide sensitization of liquid explosives.
In turn, this means when removed from the explosive, renders it
back to its original state of insensitivity. This means, also,
meets the parameter of variable uniformity as far as the hearths
are concerned. In fact, the variable uniformity on a mini-basis is
inherent in the product.
The way in which this means is developed involves taking a portion
of the rigid closed cell material, Foamglas, and subjecting it to
the preselected hydrostatic pressure necessary to give a desired
amount of breakage of the internal walls of the cells. This
pressure is applied for a time sufficient for the complete breaking
of the foam walls. The material is depressurized, drained and
dried. Depending on the amount of the pressure which is applied, a
greater or lesser number of internal walls within the rigid closed
cell foam will be ruptured making a part of the rigid material open
celled and a part of it closed cell. The remaining closed cells,
after the treatment, are usually smaller than the cells which have
been hydraulically breached; however, this is basically a function
of wall strength with respect to the exposed area to the pressure
and the pressure. After the treatment, that material has, for
sensitization characteristic advantages, many sharp edges and
points (which have been developed by the breached walls), minute
particles, within the foam (which serve as inhomogeneities and
which are developed by the breaking of internal walls), and
residual closed cells, including many ranging down to even
submicron sizes. All of these serve collectively to provide energy
centers, as the shock wave passes over them on initiation.
It was found that the sensitivity to detonation can be increased as
a sensitizer (for a particular explosive) by changing its
character, up to a point, by the increased amount of hydrostatic
breaking employed, including greater pressure and longer times. At
an optimum, the sensitization will be sufficient to cause
detonation at a velocity greater than the steady state detonating
velocity for the involved liquid explosive. This is the condition
of "overdriven" velocities, which allows propagation beyond the
sensitized area. For closed cell rigid foams, which have been
treated with lower pressures, sensitivity to detonation of
nitromethane will decrease with the lowering of such pressures
until it reaches a point of incompetent detonation, or none at all.
This lower pressure will vary with the matrix material of the foam,
but the Foamglas, pressures below about 250 p.s.i. become
increasingly ineffective.
Examples of the validity of the concept are samples of Foamglas of
two inches long by 2 inches OD. Each was subject to 400 p.s.i.g.,
drained, dried at 450.degree.F. for two hours and weighed. They are
identified as GFm10 and GFm12 on the examples shown above. Their
calculated minimum closed cell porosity respectively was 14.2 and
10.3 percent; however, empirical estimates placed these minimums at
15.9 and 15.3 percent. It is rather more important to relate the
effective sensitization attained to the pressure and breaking time
used. For practical considerations, a maximum pressure to be
effective would be about 1,000 p.s.i.g. for five minutes.
Other rigid closed cell foams are worthy of consideration for this
technique including sulphur, ceramic, and rigid plastic foams.
Advantages of low cost attend the glass foam, sulphur and some of
the plastics.
According to the invention, I have found a way to make an explosive
which autosterilizes without creating any light, sound, or smoke,
during the self-sterilizing. It has been discovered that there is a
variation of the reversible means described above. This variation
allows one-time reversing of sensitizing when this may be required.
One-time reversing is equivalent to auto-sterilization of the
explosive, and where the reversing means mentioned in the text
above depends on the physical removal of the carrier and heat
centers, the one-time reversibility uses a carrier, foam or roll,
which is soluble, in a predetermined time in the potentially
explosive liquid. Once the carrier is dissolved, the particles will
separate by floatation or settling. When the sensitizing nuclei
have coalesced they will no longer serve to sensitize the liquid.
That is, the detonator may function but will not initiate the main
charge. Alternately, during the time period prior to the
dissolution of the foam, such as a tar foam in nitromethane, and
after the foam is flooded for use with liquid explosive, it can
initiate the main charge directly from the detonator. In this
means, as in the others, a mini-irregularity is expected in the
dispersion of the hearths.
To employ this invention, the sensitizer, such as microspheres in
adequate proportion in a polyurethane open cell foam, is submerged
and saturated in the liquid explosive. It is caused to maintain
this position, as some will tend to float and others tend to sink,
by any suitable means. A detonating cap, Primacord, primer, or
other shock source must be inserted into the approximate center of
the sensitizing assembly to initiate the explosion. If not
detonated, the sequence may be reversed, in which instance the
detonator is removed, the liquid removed from the sensitizer by
draining or, if flexible, squeezing. As one example, if the
sensitizing material is used in a tube, such as a detonating cord,
it may be desensitized by simply allowing the liquid to drain out,
or blowing it out with air. The removed liquid is desensitized to
its original state, and it is safe for its recommended storage. The
sensitizer at this point should not have sufficient liquid left in
it to sustain detonation even if it were accidentally initiated.
The matrix will usually be water insoluble, in which case the
sensitizer may simply be washed in water and replaced on shelf
storage. If it is desired to reactivate the liquid to an explosive
by sensitizing, the sensitizer is simply reimmersed in the liquid
and it is ready to use. This reversibility can be repeated as often
as desired until it is desired to use the activated liquid
explosive -- activated, meaning sensitized. The detonator cap can
initiate the liquid, such as nitromethane, by simply being
initiated after submerging the sensitizer in the NM with the cap in
the middle of the sensitizer.
This system provides a means for transporting the non-explosive
precursors of an explosive system. The mixing is easily done in
situ of the explosion. The explosive mixture is easily deactivated
or desensitized, if the explosion is not thereafter needed. Subject
to the level of sensitization of a particular mixture employing
this means and to the character of the potentially explosive liquid
involved, relatively smaller diameters with high orders of
sensitization can be identified as critical diameters for specific
mixtures. Accordingly, for a mixture or liquid which might support
detonation if having a one-inch critical diameter for that portion
of the liquid employing the means herein may be reduced to
one-eighth to one-quarter inch or less where the sensitizing
mixture is immersed in the liquid.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
The following code indicates the meaning of the points on FIGS. 1
and 2:
X with no marking = Glass microspheres
C = ceramic microspheres
Numeral = Test number
G = silicon Carbon Grit
An = ammonium Nitrate added
P = detonation and Positive
Propagation Evaluation
beyond Booster
Np = detonation and Negative
Propagation Evaluation
beyond Booster
x = Detonation in Booster
o = No detonation in Booster
It can be noted from the graph, FIG. 2, the percentage of
inhomogeneous material, such as microsphere to the nitromethane, by
weight, is plotted against the weight of such inhomogeneous
material per unit volume of prefoamed chemicals. The principal
characteristic of this curve is much more subordinate to the
percentage of hearths to the weight of NM than it is to the
starting conditions of the mix; however, the two together define,
for each type of materials used, and show a characteristic slope
indicating greater sensitivity as their values increase to some
uneconomic point. It can be seen from these lines that, in the
event a particular value of the prefoamed condition did not develop
into the anticipated volume, the point would fall above the lines
into the area of lesser sensitivity, if any at all, such as point
No. 34, or 51. Likewise, if the material foamed much more than was
usual or expected, making less dense foam, the point would fall
well below the line and, also, into an area of lesser sensitivity,
if any at all.
Of unusual importance, it is noted from about point No. 54 to about
point No. 37, on the ceramic microsphere line, and approximately
point No. 56 to approximately point No. 52 on the glass microsphere
line, propagation beyond the area of initiation and sensitization
is indicated. This is that area in which overdriven velocities of
detonation can be expected, sufficient in the case of NM to
propagate without other sensitization.
Considering FIG. 2, the graph of material added per cubic inch of
cotton roll against percentage of material to NM in weight, it is
noted that line is still very much a straight line for the values
considered. It is noted that the sensitization to detonation for NM
was the only parameter for these tests and identified on the
graph.
PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
In the preferred embodiments of this invention, it must be
considered that first it is quite important for a No. 6 detonator
cap to be able to initiate the sensitized explosive, as this is the
size of cap often used in commerce. While other larger caps are
available, they are more expensive and less readily available. A
No. 6 cap might be expected to contain in the order of 4.9 grains
of PETN in its base charge. All of the test work and data shown
above for this invention have employed No. 6 caps.
For the highest performance in sensitizing a liquid explosive to
detonation, a preferred construction of the sensitizer would be
similar to that shown as point No. 49 on the ceramic microsphere
graph line. Similarly, any of the mixes indicated by the double bar
lines, for either the glass or ceramic microspheres, would be
considered as preferred ratios, in that within those areas not only
is the NM initiated with a No. 6 cap, it is very substantially
overdriven at a velocity to cause it to behave very much like a
crystalline military HE indicating a major increase in energy
release. This overdriving effect represents a velocity in excess of
ten percent greater than the normal steady state velocity of
detonation of NM, and, in fact, causes continued propagation in
diameters above the critical diameter without other sensitizing.
The overdriven effect continues for some distance beyond the
sensitized area offering major potential in the use of this method
for shaped charges and other special explosive devices requiring
very high velocities and high energy releases.
In the use of the urethane open cell foam, including microspheres,
as indicated, mechanical means will have to be provided to hold the
sensitizer submerged in the liquid explosive. With the cotton roll
means, a means is needed to prevent it from sinking in the liquid.
A simple means for both of these is a wedge of wood or other
material in the event the sensitizer is not snug fit to the liquid
explosive container.
A preferred embodiment, from a view of economics alone, for the
sensitizing suggests these rigid foams which are subjected to
intercell breaking as mentioned above. Of these Foamglas appears to
be an excellent candidate.
It is important to consider the advantages of frangible
microspheres as the hearths, preferably of crystalline materials
for what appears to be added hearth effects from tests. It appears
that there is somewhat greater sensitizing available from glass
microspheres over resin microspheres or grit, and somewhat greater
sensitizing appears to be evident from ceramic microspheres over
those of glass, with other optimums being considered.
A ceramic microsphere filled foam within the limits of
applicability for creating overdriving velocities may combine
numerous inhomogeneities for its favorable behavior which include
the service of pressure centering, adiabatic heating of included
gases, sharp debris from microsphere collapse, with friction and
point heating, and in sufficient indicated quantities and
proximities including mini-irregularity in dispersion to suggest
channel effects and micro-jets. Collectively, such preferred
construction will reduce initiation requirements without creating
any oversensitization or hazard. It is important to observe that
mini-channels could hardly exist using low to very low
concentrations of microspheres, though sensitization to detonation
might still be achieved for the volume of the sensitizer itself in
some lower concentrations.
A preferred method of mixing the hearths, microspheres, etc. into
the urethane foam would be to first mix the weighed hearths in the
predetermined desired amount, considering the percentage to liquid
explosive being sought, into the polyol, or active hydrogen, phase
in an intimate manner, then quickly blend in the isocyanate and
withdraw to allow the foam to expand and cure. During the cure this
is particularly fragile and should not be disturbed until its
strength has been completely developed. After cure, a cap well is
drilled, as about a 1/4 inch diameter hole, to about one inch deep
into the sensitizer.
Since the mechanics of creating a mini-non-uniformity of the
hearths where they are included in the plastic foam rely entirely
on the final percentage of the hearths to the liquid explosive by
weight, any plastic which can be foamed to provide these pen cells
still entraining the heat centers in the method required would be
suitable for this; however, urethane is considered one of the
preferred foams to use for this purpose.
* * * * *