U.S. patent number 3,791,551 [Application Number 05/292,973] was granted by the patent office on 1974-02-12 for tamper-proof closure for spray cans.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Plasti-Kote Company (a div. of Consolidated Foods, Inc.). Invention is credited to John W. Madeira.
United States Patent |
3,791,551 |
Madeira |
February 12, 1974 |
TAMPER-PROOF CLOSURE FOR SPRAY CANS
Abstract
A tamper-proof closure for enclosing and sealing the valve
structure of a spray can. The closure is adapted to be held in
position on the can by engagement of an external circumferential
snap-in flange of the closure with an annular wall of the can and
valve assembly. The closure comprises a tubular skirt section
having an external circumferential snap-in flange formed at its
lower edge. A valve covering body section is interconnected with
the skirt section. A radially extending flange projects from the
skirt section. The axial distance between the flange and the lower
edge of the skirt section is such that with the closure in place on
the can a clearance is defined between the flange and the bead of
the can. Such clearance defines a tool access opening or recess.
The closure is removed from the spray can as by inserting the end
of a tool in the tool access opening and thereafter lifting a
portion of the closure from the can.
Inventors: |
Madeira; John W. (Akron,
OH) |
Assignee: |
Plasti-Kote Company (a div. of
Consolidated Foods, Inc.) (Medina, OH)
|
Family
ID: |
23127047 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/292,973 |
Filed: |
September 29, 1972 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
99593 |
Dec 18, 1970 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
220/787;
220/284 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B65D
83/40 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B65D
83/14 (20060101); B65d 041/62 () |
Field of
Search: |
;220/60,85P
;222/402.11,182,402.13,562,402.12,183 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Tollberg; Stanley H.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Fay, Sharpe and Mulholland
Parent Case Text
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 99,593, filed Dec.
18, 1970 now abaondoned.
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A tamper-proof closure for spray cans having a manually operable
spray valve projecting from the top of the can, an annular recess
surrounding the valve defined by a bottom wall and an inside and
outside wall, a groove defined in the outside wall, and a
circumferentially extended bead surrounding the recess adjacent the
outside wall, said closure comprising:
a valve covering body section;
a tubular skirt section of larger cross-section than said body
section and interconnected to said body section by means of a
radial shoulder;
said skirt section adapted to be received within the recess of such
spray can;
holding means integral with said skirt section seatable within said
groove for retaining said closure on such spray can;
an annular flange integral with said closure and projecting from
said skirt section in substantially the same plane as said
shoulder, said flange extending radially a distance sufficient to
overlie at least a portion of the bead of such spray can;
the relationship of said flange to the bead of such spray can being
such that with said closure in place an axial clearance is defined
between said flange and the bead as the axial distance from said
holding means to said flange exceeds the axial distance from the
can groove to the top of the can bead when the holding means is
seated in said groove;
said clearance defining a tool access recess of sufficient
dimension to provide a space for entry of a prying tool from above
the bead;
whereby a tool end may be disposed within said recess to remove
said closure from said spray can.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to closures and more particularly to a
tamper-proof closure or safety closure adapted to be applied to the
top of a pressurized spray can of the type commonly employed for
spraying various substances including paint, insecticides, cleaning
materials, cosmetics, pharmeceuticals and the like. As used herein,
the term spray can is intended to be generic to dispensing
containers of the type wherein the contents are dispensed through a
valve by means of a pressurizing agent such as carbon dioxide,
fluorocarbons, hydrocarbons and the like. A common type of
container utilizing a pressurizing agent as a propellent is the
aerosol can wherein the dispensed material expelled from the can is
a mixture of material and propellent. This invention is also
directed to the dispensing container of the type wherein the
dispensed material is forced from the can by the pressurizing agent
without interaction of the pressurizing agent and the dispensed
material. This invention, therefore, is broadly applicable to
dispensing containers of the spray or aerosol type.
Typically, pressurized spray cans are provided with a manually
operable spray valve projecting endwise from the top of the can and
along the can axis. In order to prevent accidental discharge of the
can, it is a common practice to provide a closure for the can which
comprises an element which frictionally or otherwise coengages with
the can. Closures of the prior art have taken two different forms:
the overcap and undercap designs.
The overcap design fastens to an external circumferential portion
of the can end and is of a diameter approximating the can diameter.
Thus, the overcap type of closure is a highly visible part of the
total can-closure package.
The undercap design is adapted to be received within the mounting
cup of the valve assembly adjacent the bead defined in the dome of
the can.
Can closures of either design, however, may be readily subject to
removal and misuse of the contents of the can. An easily removable
closure also leads to frequent testing or sampling of spray cans in
the store prior to purchase. This testing or sampling may result in
damage to the retailer's property as well as a considerable loss of
contents of the can prior to the purchase thereof by another
customer.
Many attempts have been made in the prior art to render spray can
closure members of either the overcap or undercap design
tamper-proof. The general intent of the prior art tamper-proof
closures has been to provide a closure that is somewhat difficult
to remove. Prior art overcap closures of the tamper-proof design
have included various locking mechanisms adapted to be disengaged
as by rotation of the closure or insertion of a tool. Tamper-proof
undercap closures of the prior art have used interconnecting
flangible means adapted to be broken as by twisting, tearing, or
pressing of the closure. Other undercap closures have utilized
locking structures adapted to be dislodged by means of a tool.
This invention provides a tamper-proof closure of the undercap
design for use with a spray can and wherein the closure is provided
with a generally radially extending flange which is adapted to
cooperate with bead of the can to define a tool receiving access
opening or recess for easy removal of the closure from the can.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Briefly described, the tamper-proof closure of this invention
comprises a valve covering body section. A tubular skirt section is
interconnected with the body section. The skirt section is adapted
to be received within the recess of a valve mounting cup. Holding
means are provided at the external surface of the skirt section for
retainig the closure on the spray can. A radially extending flange
projects from the skirt section. The axial distance between the
flange and the lower edge of the skirt is such that with the
closure in place on the can a clearance is defined between the
flange and the bead of the can providing a tool access opening or
recess within which a tool end may be disposed so as to remove the
closure from the can.
THE INVENTION DESCRIBED
The preferred embodiment of the invention will now be described
with reference to the attached drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is an exploded elevational view of a spray can and a
tamper-proof closure according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the tamper-proof closure
according to the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the tamper-proof closure
according to the present invention as positioned in place on a
spray can and showing a tool end in place;
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view similar to FIG. 3 and showing the
removing of the tamper-proof closure according to the present
invention;
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a modification of the
tamper-proof closure according to the present invention.
Referring particularly to FIG. 1, there is shown a spray can 10
having a cylindrical upright body 12. A domed top 14 is secured to
the upper end of the can by means of an annular rim 16. A cup
member 18 including a valve 20 is crimped into the domed top at a
circumferentially extended bead 22. As shown more clearly in FIG.
3, the cup member 18 is defined by a bottom wall 24, an inside wall
26 and an outside wall 28. A generally annular groove 30 is defined
in the outside wall 28 and cooperates with the tamper-proof closure
32 of this invention in a manner to be described more fully
hereafter.
The valve 20 as mounted on the cup member 18 includes a valve
actuator 34 having a dispensing opening 36. It is to be understood
that with the tamper-proof closure 32 removed, the valve 20 is
actuated as by depressing valve actuator 34 whereupon material will
be dispensed through the opening 36. Although the dispensing
container 10 illustrated in FIG. 1 is a pressurized container, the
present invention is not limited to a tamper-proof closure for a
pressurized container but is suitable for use on non-pressurized
containers.
Attention will now be directed to the tamper-proof closure 32
according to the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, the closure
includes a tubular valve covering body section 38 with an integral
end wall 40. A tubular skirt section 42 is provided at the lower
portion of the body section 38 and is of substantially less height
than the body section 38 having an internal diameter somewhat
greater than the external diameter of body section 38. A radial
shoulder 44 interconnects the skirt section 42 with the body
section 38. Radial shoulder 44 is generally annular in shape
extending circumferentially about the body section 38. It will be
observed from FIGS. 1 and 3 that the body section 38 and the skirt
section 42 are coaxial.
Holding means are provided integral with the skirt section 42 for
retaining the tamper-proof closure in a position shown in FIG. 3.
In the preferred embodiment of this invention as shown in FIG. 3,
said holding means comprises a snap-in flange 46 defined on the
exterior surface of the skirt section 42 near its lower edge 47.
Snap-in flange 46 is adapted to be received within the groove 30
defined in the outside wall of the cup member 18. Thus, the
cooperating snap-in flange 46 and groove 30 frictionally retain the
tamper-proof closure 32 in the position shown in FIG. 3 thereby
rendering more difficult the removal of the tamper-proof closure 32
in the absence of a suitable tool.
In the embodiments of FIGS. 1-5, snap-in flange 46 extends
substantially circumferentially about the skirt section 42. Within
the scope of this invention should also be considered snap-in
flanges with multiple interruptions or skirt sections with multiple
detent members extending therefrom.
It will be observed that the cup member 18 as defined by the bottom
wall 24, inside wall 26, and outside wall 28, generally defines a
recess in the domed top 14 of the can 10 inasmuch as the bottom
wall 24 is disposed substantially below the bead 22. It is in this
recess defined by the walls 24, 26, and 28 that the tamper-proof
closure 32 of this invention is adapted to be received and
frictionally retained against inadvertent displacement. A generally
radially extending flange 49 projects from skirt section 42. As
will be observed in FIG. 3 the axial distance between flange 49 and
the lower edge 47 of skirt section 42 exceeds the depth of the cup
member 18 such that with the closure in place a clearance is
provided between shoulder 54 of flange 49 and bead 22. Such
clearance defines a tool access opening or recess 48.
The tamper-proof closure 32 of the invention may be removed from
the spray can as by the insertion of the end 52 of a screwdriver or
other tool into the recess 48. subsequent engagement of the tool
with shoulder 54 produces a tilting or cocking of the closure 42
within the recess defined by the walls 24, 26 and 28 as shown in
FIG. 4. With a substantial portion of the snap-in flange 46 thus
removed from the groove 30, the closure 32 may be readily removed
from the can. Replacement of the closure 32 on the can simply
requires a coaxial alignment of the closure and the can as shown
more clearly in FIG. 1 with subsequent snap-in engagement of the
respective members.
As is shown in FIG. 3, the relative positions of the bead 22 and
the shoulder 54 are such that the tool end 52 may be pivoted or
rotated on the bead 22 in order to secure mechanical advantage in
tilting or cocking the closure 32 into the position of FIG. 4.
While it is not necessary that the bead 22, or indeed any portion
of the can, act as a pivot point or fulcrum for the tool end, the
relationship of the bead 22 to the recess 48 is such that, in the
embodiment of FIG. 3, the tamper-proof closure 32 may be quickly
and effortlessly removed.
The skirt section 42, from which flange 49 extends, acts to prevent
the entry of the tool into the interior of the closure in the
vicinity of the valve 20. There is no danger of the screwdriver
accidentally touching the valve 20 at the time the closure is
removed.
As will be observed from FIG. 1, flange 49 is continuous about the
skirt section 42. Thus recess 48 is continuous about the
circumference of the bead 22 with the closure in place and a tool
end may be inserted into the recess at any point on the
circumference of the bead. No prior orientation of the can is
necessary prior to removal of the closure.
While in the preferred embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 3,
flange 49 is in the same plane as shoulder 44, it should be
recognized that this condition is present when the flange 49 is
located at the upper edge of the skirt section 42. In alternate
embodiments, flange 49 may be located at different locations in the
skirt section 42; not necessarily in the same plane as shoulder
44.
As shown in FIG. 3 lower edge 47 of skirt section 42 bottoms on
wall 24 with the closure in place. This relationship of the lower
edge of the closure and the wall of the cup member enhances the
sealing characteristics of the enclosure. It should be understood,
however, that in alternate embodiments the lower edge need not
bottom on the cup member so long as the axial distance between the
snap-in flange 46 and shoudler 54 exceeds the axial distance
between the groove 30 and the bead 22.
As shown in FIG. 3, flange 49 extends radially outwardly to an
extent such that approximately one-half of the bead 22 is covered
by such flange. Variations in the extent to which the bead 22 is
covered by the flange should be considered within the spirit of
this invention.
While flange 49, in the preferred embodiment of the invention,
extends from skirt section 42, it is possible through the use of an
extremely short skirt section that the flange 49 could extend from
the body section 38. Such a variation in the positioning of the
flange 49 should be considered within the scope of the
invention.
An alternate embodiment of the tamper-proof closure of this
invention is shown in FIG. 5.
The principal distinction between the embodiment of FIG. 5 and that
shown in FIG. 2 is with respect to the shape of the body section
38. Whereas in FIG. 2, body section 38 is generally tubular in
shape including an integral end wall 40, the body section 60 of
FIG. 5 is generally dome shaped and is interconnected to the skirt
section 42 by means of shoulder 44 in a manner similar to that
shown in FIG. 2. The skirt section 42 of the closure of FIG. 2 is
similar to that described with reference to FIG. 3.
In the preferred embodiment, the closure of this invention is made
of polyethylene plastic. Other materials well known to those
skilled in the art may similarly be used.
The closure of this invention provides several distinct
advantages.
The closure cannot be removed in stores without the use of a tool.
Thus, the troublesome problem experienced by store managers of
in-store spraying by potential customers will be eliminated.
Since the closure of this invention is relatively small and covers
only the valve structure of the spray can, this invention may be
used in combination with a conventional overcap where it is
desirable to completely enclose the entire end portion of the spray
can. With the closure of this invention in place, a potential
customer may remove the overcap of the can to make sure the can is
equipped with a spray button if he so desires. The closure of this
invention will prohibit the customer from actuating the button
while in the store.
where the closure of this invention is provided on automobile paint
touch-up spray cans, the customer may take the lid or overcap of
the can out to his automobile to compare colors. The closure of
this invention remains in place during the color comparison by the
customer ensuring that the customer will not otherwise actuate the
can and remove some of the contents thereof.
The closure of this invention can be removed from the can without
danger of puncturing the can or damaging the spray button or valve
assembly.
The closure of this invention seals the spray head against dirt and
moisture.
Since the closure of this invention prohibits in-store spraying, a
full measure is assured to each customer at each sale. Furthermore,
the closure of this invention prevents preclogged nozzles resulting
from customer tampering in the store.
The stepped design of the closure itself, wherein a radial shoulder
44 interconnects the valve covering body section and the skirt
section, permits the closure to be machine installed on the spray
can during filling and packaging of the can.
* * * * *