U.S. patent number 3,791,396 [Application Number 05/289,758] was granted by the patent office on 1974-02-12 for valve shutoff device.
Invention is credited to Wesley C. Nelson.
United States Patent |
3,791,396 |
Nelson |
February 12, 1974 |
VALVE SHUTOFF DEVICE
Abstract
A device for shutting off a valve in a supply line carrying
combustible gas or liquid which is actuated when subjected to the
influence of significant earth tremors or vibratory exitation. A
valve stem extension is connected with the stem of an existing
valve. The valve stem extension has a lever arm which is normally
held in a position at which the connected valve is open. The lever
arm is spring biased in a direction in which the lever would travel
if the valve were closed; the bias is created by a spring
positioned between said lever and one side of a frame attached to
said supply line. A latch holds the lever arm in the normal
position until and unless the device is subjected to significant
earth tremors or vibratory excitation. Under the influence of
significant earth tremors or vibratory excitation a weight,
balanced on the other side of said frame, will topple, thereby
pulling a chain attached to the latch and opening the latch. The
spring bias causes the lever arm to move so the valve stem
extension and valve stem turn to close the valve.
Inventors: |
Nelson; Wesley C. (San Jose,
CA) |
Family
ID: |
23112951 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/289,758 |
Filed: |
September 15, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
137/38; 251/66;
251/68 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F16K
17/36 (20130101); Y10T 137/0753 (20150401) |
Current International
Class: |
F16K
17/36 (20060101); F16k 017/36 () |
Field of
Search: |
;137/38,39,45,463
;251/66,68-70,73,74 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Nilson; Robert G.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Moore, Zimmerman & Dubb
Claims
That which is claimed is:
1. A valve shutoff device which is activated when subjected to
earth tremors or other vibratory excitation, comprising:
a frame positionable in the vicinity of a valve, said valve being
in a supply pipeline for combustible gases or liquids;
a lever attached to the stem of said valve;
means attached between said frame and said lever for biasing said
lever to propel said lever in a direction in which it will move to
close said valve;
a catch member rotatably attached adjacent one end thereof to said
frame, said lever being held by said catch member against the
propulsion of said biasing;
a latch member rotatably attached adjacent one end thereof to said
frame, said latch member being detachably attachable to said catch
member exteriorly along the length of said catch member relative to
the point said lever is held by said catch member;
a weight normally balanced on said frame, and
means for connecting said weight with said latch member so that the
toppling of said weight moves said latch member to allow said catch
member to move, thereby permitting said lever to rotate under the
impetus of said biasing means and effect the closing of said
valve.
2. A device as in claim 1 further characterized in that said
biasing means comprises spring tension means.
3. A device as in claim 2 wherein said spring tension means is a
coil spring attached to said frame by an adjustment rod attached
between said coil spring and said frame, said adjustment rod being
adjustably attached to said frame to permit the tension in said
spring to be changed.
4. A device as in claim 1 including a valve stem extension
connected with said stem of said valve to extend the length
thereof, said valve stem extension also being connected with said
lever.
5. A device as in claim 1 in which the arc of rotation of said
valve stem is limited by a pair of stop means which define an on
position at which said valve is open and an off position at which
said valve is closed.
6. A device in accordance with claim 1 wherein said latch member
comprises a notched bar and said catch member is detachably
attachable at said notch in said bar.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Earthquakes are a recurring natural clamity that have wrecked havoc
with mankind and with his environment during the course of recorded
history. Traditionally, the greatest danger to people has come from
collapsing structures. In rural areas the greatest property losses
have come from the vibration and collapse of manmade structures. In
urban areas, and particularly in recent times, the greatest
property losses have come from vast fires which have raged long
after the primary tremors have subsided. This problem of fire loss
may not be susceptible to complete solution, but just as structures
can be constructed to be earthquake proof fire prevention measures
may be taken, although few such measures have been taken to work
out or enforce a solution.
Explosions in industrial plants occur when explosive or highly
combustible materials are mishandled. The initial blasts cause
considerable property damage and loss of life but often the greater
property damage is caused by raging conflagrations set off by the
initial blast. The spread of such fires is aided by the initial
widespread distribution of burning materials, by the availability
of dry or otherwise combustible materials and, at times, by the
availability of liquid or gaseous fuels due to the severing of
pipelines or storage tanks. Such fires will be less likely to
spread if the last factor is eliminated, e.g., if the supply of
liquid or gaseous fuels would be cut off after the occurrance of an
explosion.
The principal source of combustible fuel to residential dwellings
is natural gas which is transported under pressure and delivered
through individual meters and valves. Natural gas is also often
delivered through individual meters and valves to commercial
establishments and to hospitals, schools and other public
buildings. In cold climates, fuel oil is stored in basement tanks
and is used during the course of the winter; inflow and outflow
valves control the delivery and discharge of the fuel oil. In
industrial plants of various kinds, flammable liquids and gases
that are used in processing and as product constituents are piped
through valves which are used to control thee rate of flow. In all
of these situations, in the event the supply pipelines are
subjected to significant earth tremors or to vibratory excitation,
fires may be started or fueled by broken pipelines. If supply
vessels are ruptured then little can be done until the fuel in the
vessels is exhausted but if pipelines are broken then the closing
of valves will greatly reduce the extent of fire damage. In many
instances, it would not be possible for a human operator to get
close to the valves to shut them off since the fire may be too hot
or the danger too great; an automatic valve shutoff device in such
instances would be highly desirable.
Many types of valves are used to control the flow of flammable
gaseous and liquid materials including disc valves, wedge-gate
valves, angle valves, and ball valves. The valves are ordinarily
operated by turning an externally accessable valve stem. In
ordinary usage, these valves have an off or closed position and an
on or open position. Often only a small angular rotation of the
valve stem is required to turn the valve from on to off and the
respective positions are fixed by stops which interact with the
rotatable externally accessable valve stem. Thus, only a small arc
of rotation separates a dangerous condition from a safe one once a
supply pipeline has been severed after experiencing significant
earth tremors or vibratory excitation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A valve stem extension is provided which can be connected with the
externally accessable valve stem of a valve installed within a
pipeline through which flammable gases or liquids flow. The valve
stem extension has a lever arm which protrudes therefrom and which
normally occupies a position at which the connected valve is open.
The lever arm is biased in the direction in which the lever arm
must rotate to close the valve. The bias is created by a spring
positioned between one end of a frame attached to the supply
pipeline and the lever arm. The lever arm is held in the normal
position by a latch which grips the outer end of the arm. The latch
is opened under the influence of a significant earth tremor or
vibratory excitation by means of a chain which is attached to a
weight, balenced on the other end of said frame, which topples.
Once the latch releases the lever arm, the attached spring pulls it
through an arc of rotation to close the valve whose stem is
connected to the valve stem extension.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the valve shutoff device of
the present invention reference may be had to the accompanying
drawings which are incorporated herein by reference and in
which:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the valve shutoff device shown to
be detachably attached to a supply pipeline;
FIG. 2 is a side view of the valve shutoff device illustrating the
connection between the valve stem extension and the valve stem;
and
FIG. 3 is a detailed side view of the balanced weight and latch
incorporated in the valve shutoff device.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The structure of one embodiment of the valve shutoff device of the
present invention may be seen by referring to FIGS. 1 and 2 in
which a frame 15 is detachably attached by means of contoured
parallel plates 16 and attachment bolts to supply pipeline 5. Frame
15 supports an adjustment rod21 at one end, a valve stem extension
25 in its middle region and a support assembly 11 at the other end.
It is evident that frame 15 has been attached to supply pipeline 5
on either side of a valve 6 located between successive sections of
supply pipeline 5. This positioning permits valve stem extension 25
to fit over the valve stem 27 of valve 6; typically the inner
contours of valve stem extension 25 will be mated to the exterior
contours of valve stem 27.
The range of rotation of valve stem 27 is seen to be limited from
the on position at which valve stem nub 9 abuts open stop 7 (the
position at which valve 6 is open) and the position at which valve
stem nub 9 abuts closed stop 8 (the position at which valve 6 is
closed). Normally, the opening or closing of the valve 6 would be
accomplished by using an appropriately configured handle over the
top of the valve stem 27 or by using a wrench. The valve stem is
rotated in accordance with the present invention by forcing the
rotation of valve stem extension 25 which forces valve stem 27 to
rotate. Other types of connections between a valve stem extension
and a valve stem may be employed including welded or bolt-on
connections but a fit-over temporary connection has been found to
be the most desirable since the valve shut off device may be more
readily installed or removed.
The rotation of valve stem extension 25 is forced by the bias
action of spring 20. Adjustment rod 21 passes through the end of
frame 15 and is adjustable in position by means of adjustment nut
22. Eyelet 24 of adjustment rod 21 receives spring hook 23 at one
end of spring 20. The other hook on spring 20, hook 28, passes
through an opening in extension lever 26 which is integral with
valve stem extension 25. When extension lever 26 is free to move,
as described below, the bias action of spring 20 pulls extension
lever 26 so that valve stem extension 25 is rotated clockwise and
valve 6 is closed. Other tension means may be used to generate the
bias of lever arm 26 in place of spring 20 including hydraulic
means or a weight and pulley system. It has been found that simple
springs are preferrable since they are inexpensive and do not
degrade easily over an extended period of time.
The release of lever extension 26 to permit the rotation of valve
stem extension 25 is accomplished by the action of the triggering
mechanism of support assembly 11. Support assembly 11, as shown, is
rotatably attached to frame 15. As shown in FIG. 3 the upper ledge
is connected directly to frame 15 while lower arm 13 is bolted, for
convenience, to attachment bolt 18 which holds contoured parallel
plates 16 of frame 15 to supply pipeline 5. A latch assembly 30
normally holds lever extension 26 in place in opposition to the
bias produced by spring 20. Balanced weight 10 rests on the upper
ledge of support assembly 11 and is connected to latch assembly 30
by a chain 12. When the device is subjected to a significant earth
tremor or to vibratory excitation balanced weight 10 will topple,
thereby pulling chain 12 upwards and causing latch assembly 30 to
effect the release of lever extension 26 with the resultant closing
of valve 6.
The operation of the triggering mechanism of the valve shutoff
device may be seen clearly from FIG. 3. The solid lines indicate
the mechanism in its normal position while the phantom lines
indicate the mechanism immediately after a significant earth tremor
or vibratory excitation has been experienced. Balanced weight 10 is
seen to normally rest in an upright position on the upper ledge of
support assembly 11, and is seen to topple over as shown by the
position of phantom balanced weight 10'. When balanced weight 10
topples, it pulls attached link chain 12 upwards and lifts notched
latch member 32 to position 32'. The bias on extension lever 26
then pushes latch member 31, attached to support assembly 11 by
member 34, out of the way by rotating it to position 31' and causes
extension lever 26 to move to position 26' with the resultant
closing of the valve as described above. Various types of linkage
means and latches may be employed but it is desirable to use simple
mechanical parts since the valve shutoff device is likely to have
to remain in place for periods up to tens of years. Also, it is
desirable for homeowners to be able to install and repair their own
valve shutoff devices without having to rely on the services or
professional repairmen.
A crucial design factor in building a device for shutting off
valves subject to the influences of significant earth tremors or
vibratory excitation is the selection of the tremor or vibration
intensity required to trigger the shutoff device. The intensity
selected will depend on the particular application. For commerical,
residential or occupied structures generally the device should be
triggered whenever an earth tremor is experienced which would be
sufficient to cause structural damage including the severing of
combustible gas or liquid supply pipelines or which would be
sufficient to create stresses at the boundaries between structures
and their foundations which would rupture supply pipelines. For
schools and hospitals a higher standard may be prescribed. For
industrial plants the standards may be based on the concern for
human safety, the likelihood of fires following an explosion and
the predictable losses due to a fire loss as against the inherent
loss in shutting down the systems in a factory; thus, it is
conceivable, if the latter factor is of prime importance in
industrial settings, that the device will be designed to be
actuated only if violent vibratory excitation is experienced.
Earth tremors are quantified in strength in two principal ways. The
magnitude of an earthquake is a measure of the energy released by
the earth movement at the epicenter of the disturbance and is
presently described by an absolute number on the Richter scale; the
scale is logarithmic to the base 10 so an increase in magnitude of
1 signifies an increase in energy of 10. The intensity of an
earthquake is a measure of the energy transmitted by an earth
disturbance to a particular observation point and is described by a
rating on an intensity scale such as the Rossi-Forel, the Modified
Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931 or the Egen Scale of Intensity;
such scales are arithmetic so that the energy associated with
intensity VI is six times greater than the energy associated with
intensity I. Since the valve shutoff device of the present
invention is concerned with preventing fire damage after a
significant earth tremor or vibratory excitation is experienced at
a particular location the threshold tremor or vibratory excitation
level for the device should be set in accordance with one of the
intensity scales. It is believed the tremor threshold or equivalent
vibratory excitation threshold for the triggering of the valve
shutoff device of the present invention should preferrably be set
at between intensity V and intensity VII on the Modified Mercalli
Intensity Scale of 1931 as revised by C. F. Richter in 1956 and
included herein as Table I. (see William Mansfield Adams,
Earthquakes, 1964, pp 55-57). The actual setting can be made after
a balancing of the risks is made in accordance with the discussion
above. It is possible that governmental bodies will establish
threshold standards which will be incorporated in the manufacture
of devices in accordance with the present invention.
The sensitivity of the triggering mechanism of the automatic valve
shutoff device depends principally upon the shape and weight of
balanced weight 10 as shown in all figures of the drawing.
Stability is obtained by lowering the center of gravity of balanced
weight 10, increasing its surface area which rests on support
member 11 and by providing a stable resting surface on the upper
ledge of support member 11. Stability, and thus the intensity of
the earth tremor or vibratory excitation required to trigger the
device, is decreased by heightening the contrary characteristics. A
wide variety of design features may be employed to obtain the
desired tremor or excitation threshold and all are contemplated
within the scope of this invention. Of course it would be possible
to provide weights of different sizes and shapes which could be
made detachably attachable with the device and used as the need
arises.
While the invention has been described in connection with specific
embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of
further modification, and this application is intended to cover any
variations, uses or adaptations of the invention following, in
general, the principles of the invention and including such
departures from the present disclosure as come within known or
customary practice in the art to which the invention pertains and
as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth,
and as fall within the scope of the invention and the limits of the
appended claims.
TABLE I
Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931
I. Not felt. Marginal and long-period effects of large
earthquakes....
II. Felt by persons at rest, on upper floors, or favorably
placed.
III. Felt indoors. Hanging objects swing. Vibration like passing of
light trucks. Duration estimated. May not be recognized as an
earthquake.
IV. Hanging objects swing. Vibration like passing of heavy trucks;
or sensation of a jolt like a heavy ball striking the walls.
Standing motor cars rock. Windows, dishes, doors rattle. Glasses
clink. Crockery clashes. In the upper range of IV wooden walls and
frame creak.
V. Felt outdoors; direction estimated. Sleepers wakened. Liquids
disturbed, some spilled. Small unstable objects displaced or upset.
Doors swing, close, open. Shutters, pictures move. Pendulum clocks
stop, start, change rate.
VI. Felt by all. Many frightened and run outdoors. Persons walk
unsteadily. Windows, dishes, glassware broken. Knickknacks, books,
etc., off shelves. Pictures off walls. Furniture moved or
overturned. Weak plaster and masonry D cracked. Small bells ring
(church, school). Trees, bushes shaken. . . .
VII. Difficult to stand. Noticed by drivers of motor cars. Hanging
objects quiver. Furniture broken. Damage to masonry D, including
cracks. Weak chimneys broken at roof line. Fall of plaster, loose
bricks, stones, tiles, cornices.... Some cracks in masonry C. Waves
on ponds; water turbid with mud. Small slides and caving in along
sand or gravel banks. Large bells ring. Concrete irrigation ditches
damaged.
VIII. Steering of motor cars affected. Damage to masonry C; partial
collapse. Some damage to masonry B; none to masonry A. Fall of
stucco and some masonry walls. Twisting, fall of chimneys, factory
stacks, monuments, towers, elevated tanks. Frame houses moved on
foundations if not bolted down; loose panel walls thrown out.
Decayed piling broken off. Branches broken from trees. Changes in
flow or temperature of springs and wells. Cracks in wet ground and
on steep slopes.
IX. General panic. Masonry D destroyed; masonry C heavily damaged,
sometimes with complete collapse; masonry B seriously damaged....
Frame structures, if not bolted, shifted off foundations. Frames
racked. Serious damage to reservoirs. Underground pipes broken.
Conspicuous cracks in ground. In alluviated areas sand and mud
ejected, earthquake fountains, sand craters.
X. Most masonry and frame structures destroyed with their
foundations. Some well-built wooden structures and bridges
destroyed. Serious damage to dams, dikes, embankments. Large
landslides. Water thrown on banks of canals, rivers, lakes, etc.
Dand and mud shifted horizontally on beaches and flat land. Rails
bent slidhtly.
XI. Rails bent greatly. Underground pipelines completely out of
service.
XII. Damage nearly total. Large rock masses displaced. Lines of
sight and level distorted. Objects thrown into the air.
* * * * *