U.S. patent number 3,788,404 [Application Number 05/221,584] was granted by the patent office on 1974-01-29 for pneumatic impact tool.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Naradi, Narodni podnik. Invention is credited to Vladimir Koudelka, Mirko Lada.
United States Patent |
3,788,404 |
Koudelka , et al. |
January 29, 1974 |
PNEUMATIC IMPACT TOOL
Abstract
A penumatic impact tool, in which oscillations below the
frequency of 1000 cycles per second, which are detrimental to the
health of the operator, are substantially reduced by the
arrangement of the working cylinder as a dilation cylinder,
composed of two axially aligned parts, cushioned with respect to
the body of the tool.
Inventors: |
Koudelka; Vladimir (Roztoky u
Krivoklatu, CS), Lada; Mirko (Prague, CS) |
Assignee: |
Naradi, Narodni podnik (Prague,
CS)
|
Family
ID: |
5339618 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/221,584 |
Filed: |
January 28, 1972 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
Current U.S.
Class: |
173/211 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B25D
17/24 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B25D
17/00 (20060101); B25D 17/24 (20060101); B25d
017/24 () |
Field of
Search: |
;173/139 ;16/119R
;92/85 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,954 |
|
Apr 1965 |
|
DL |
|
1,018,819 |
|
Nov 1957 |
|
DT |
|
Primary Examiner: Schroeder; Werner H.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Richard Low et al.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. Pneumatic impact tool comprising a substantially cylindrical
body, a working cylinder located in said body, said working
cylinder comprising an upper reaction part and a separate lower
guiding part, both said parts being axially aligned in said body
and being adapted to slide toward and away from each other, said
upper and lower parts forming together a dilatation cylinder having
a piston operating therein, said upper part and said lower part
being individually cushioned with respect to said body by at least
one prestressed elastic element respectively, an extension fixed to
the lower end of the body, a working tool slidingly arranged in the
lower part of the working cylinder and in said extension, said tool
receiving the impact from the piston and from the lower part of
said working cylinder, and means for alternately supplying and
discharging a gaseous pressure medium into and from the spaces of
the working cylinder above and below said piston.
2. The tool according to claim 1 including a casing having a
handle, said casing being slidingly secured on the upper end of
said body and axially cushioned with respect to said body by at
least one prestressed elastic element.
3. Pneumatic impact tool as set forth in claim 1 wherein a damping
space is located between the upper front wall of the reaction part
and the part of the casing facing the front wall.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE
This invention relates to an arrangement in a pneumatic impact tool
which solves the problem of reduction of vibrations transmitted to
the handle of the tool in the course of its operation.
In pneumatic impact tools, acceleration of oscillating motion is
generated over the whole range of measurable oscillations and which
oscillating motion is a consequence of the fundamental operating
principle and arrangement of such tools. The oscillations are
caused by the movement of a piston in a working cylinder through
the action of a pressure medium, generally pressurized air. The
impact of the piston on the working tool, and the impact of a
collar or of the front surface of the working tool against the body
of the device also contribute to the creation of vibration as does
the motion of the distributing means which distributes the pressure
medium to the working cylinder and by a number of other factors.
The individual influences react one with the other and their
effects are mutually combined. They result in producing vibrations
which are transmitted to the person using the tool; which from the
hygienic point of view, are rather unfavourable.
By vibrations of the tool it is to be understood that there is the
whole range of mechanical oscillations of the pneumatic impact tool
and its parts, which oscillations are generated either as so called
back strokes generated by the exciting force, or by oscillations of
frequencies which although still measurable, have values of the
order of ten thousands of cycles per second. Oscillations of
different frequencies have different effects on an individual using
the tool and their effect is determined by the capability of the
individual tissues of the human body to transmit and to damp these
oscillations. How far a certain frequency is detrimental to the
health of individual using the tool can be determined from rules
issued by health learnt from rules issued by health departments
which indicate maximum acceptable levels of acceleration for each
frequency or frequency range. According to these medical rules the
most dangerous frequencies are the lowest, frequencies which are
higher than the medium octave range at 1,000 cycles per second are
not transmitted to the human body and the medical rules do not
define any limitations therefor. The frequencies up to the medium
octave range at 1,000 cycles per second are, therefore, decisive
for consideration in determining whether the tool is suitable or
harmful from the medical point of view.
There is a number of known constructions of pneumatic impact tools
or of parts thereof, particularly handles, which sought to reduce
vibrations of the tool and prevent their transmission to the
operator. There are different arrangements which try to achieve
this effect. These are primarily different arrangements for
cushioning the handle with respect to the proper casing of the
machine. This cushioning is achieved by different kinds of springs,
by elastic material, by air cushions and by combinations of
individual elements including the use of entire handle made of
resilient material and the like.
All these known methods primarily reduce iscillations above the
range indicated by medical rules, that is they are capable of
reducing vibrations which have no substantial significance from the
point of view of the health of the operator. The range of the most
dangerous low frequencies is however in all cases influenced either
negligibly or not at all by the prior art attempts. The
contribution of these solutions is, therefore, questionable and
frequently cannot be determined using common measuring means and
methods of measuring and evaluating. It can be therefore
summarized, that known systems for reduction of vibrations of the
gripping part, that is for the handle of a pneumatic impact tool
are not effective.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of this invention to provide a pneumatic impact
tool in which the oscillations of the gripping means of the tool
within the low frequency range, that is within a range below 1000
cycles per second are substantially reduced.
It is another object of this invention to provide a pneumatic
impact tool of reduced weight compared with similar tools,
maintaining thereby the level of oscillations of the gripping means
of the tool within the range below 1000 cycles per second at a
suitable level.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from
the following description.
The pneumatic impact tool according to this invention comprises a
working cylinder arranged as a dilatation cylinder and composed of
a reaction part and a guiding part, both arranged coaxially,
sliding in a body, whereby both said parts, the reaction part and
the guiding part are individually cushioned with respect to said
body at least one prestressed elastic element, the casing with the
attached handle being arranged slidingly with respect to said body
and in the axial direction cushioned by at least one prestressed
elastic element.
A particularly advantageous arrangement is one in which a damping
space is provided between the front wall of the reaction part of
the working cylinder and the part of the casing with the handle,
facing this front wall.
A combined oscillating system is thus created by the pneumatic
impact tool according to this invention, which system can be
mathematically evaluated preferably by using an automatic
calculating machine, determining the dependence between the
stiffnesses of individual resilient elements and the masses of
individual oscillating parts so that the resulting acceleration of
the oscillating motion on the handle of the pneumatic impact tool
within the whole frequency range defined by medical rules, should
be a minimum. Comparing this arrangement with actually used methods
for reduction of vibrations, which try to remove only the
consequences of an unsuitable constructional arrangement of the
tool, the arrangement according to this invention eliminates the
generation of vibrations by a new construction arrangement of the
impact tool. By arranging the working cylinder as a dilatation
cylinder and by a suitable cushioning of its parts, both the force
acting on the working cylinder by action of the pressure medium,
and the back strokes of the working tool, are not transmitted to
the body in their full magnitude. Damping is also achieved by
cushioning of the handle with respect to the body of the impact
tool. The mantle of the impact tool with the handle connected
thereto are both, therefore, vibrated by a substantially reduced
force, with the consequence reduction of the acceleration level
within the frequency range indicated by medical rules. The
reduction of the acceleration level of oscillations within this
range substantially reduces the occurance of occupational diseases
such as, for instance, vasoneurosis and diseases of the joints. By
reduction of vibrations on the tool proper, the use of unsuitable
personal safety appliances, which make working inconvenient and the
effect of which is questionable is made unnecessary. In addition
the reduction of vibrations of the pneumatic impact tool according
to this invention has another favourable consequence. By an elastic
support for individual parts and groups of parts a more perfect
contact of the working tool with the work, such as rock, is
accomplished. By each stroke of the piston, the whole energy is
transmitted to the work or rock and transformed to useful work
contrary to other solutions, where due to a high acceleration of
the oscillating motion of the whole tool only a part of the impact
energy is utilized for the proper useful work and a certain part of
the impact energy is not utilized at all due to rebounding of the
tool. The reduction of vibrations of the tool arranged according to
this invention enables a reduction of the pressing force on the
pneumatic impact tool while maintaining perfect contact of the
working tool with the rock, achieving a higher output of the tool
with substantially reduced physical fatigue of the attendant. The
attendant is capable to work with full efficiency for a longer time
interval than with known tools. The lifetime of parts connected
with the handle is simultaneously increased and requirements for
their dimensions are reduced, permitting reduction in the overall
weight of the tool.
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
An examplary embodiment of a pneumatic impact tool according to
this invention is shown in the accompanying drawings wherein
FIG. 1 is a general schematic outline of a pneumatic impact tool in
a partial, longitudinal, cross-sectional view;
FIG. 2 is a pneumatic impact hammer shown in partial cross
sectional view; and
FIG. 3 is a detailed view of the distributing means of the pressure
medium in longitudinal section of the tool illustrated in FIGS. 1
and 2.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The working cylinder 1 of the tool is arranged as a dilatation
cylinder, composed of a reaction part 2 and a guiding part 3. A
piston 4 is slidingly arranged in this working cylinder 1. Both the
reaction part 2 and the guiding part 3 are slidingly supported in a
body 8. Each of these parts 2 and 3 is individually cushioned with
respect to the body 8 by prestressed springs 9 and 10 respectively.
The body 8 itself is slidingly supported in a casing 5 and
cushioned with respect to this casing 5 by a prestressed spring 11.
The casing 5 is provided with a handle 6. A bearing ring 12 is
arranged between the guiding part 3 and the body 8 and a similar
bearing ring 13 between the body 8 and the casing 5. The guiding
part 3 has on its lower external part a thread for an extension 16,
which together with a bearing ring 14 limits the hub of the working
tool 7, slidingly arranged in the guiding part 3 and in the
extension 16. The prestressed springs 9, 10, 11 create in the
neutral position between the reaction part 2 and the front surface
of the cavity in the casing 5 a damping space 15. An inlet opening
18 for pressurized air is provided near the top of the reaction
part 2, as indicated schematically in FIG. 1. A similar inlet
opening 19 is near the bottom of the guiding part 3 of the working
cylinder 4. An opening 20 corresponding to opening 18 is provided
in the body 8. An air escapes from the top or bottom part of the
working cylinder through the gap 21 between the reaction part 2 and
the guiding part 3 in the lower or upper extreme position of piston
4. Corresponding openings are provided in the casing 5, in FIG. 2.
They have been omitted in order not to complicate the drawing.
FIG. 3 shows schematically one possible arrangement of distributing
means. Pressurized air is introduced into the bore of an extension
17 on the top part of the casing 5 with the handle 6 (see also FIG.
1). This bore terminates in a space 22 containing valve means
consisting of a spring loaded ball 23 actuated by a control rod 24,
which in turn is controlled through the operator by a pressure
lever 25 on the handle 6 (see FIG. 1). The valve means opens the
passage into a channel 26, which is turn leads the pressure air
over upper openings 27 and lower openings 28 into a change-over
space 29, which openings 27 and 28 can be alternately opened and
closed by a sliding plate 30, admitting pressurized air either into
channel 31 connected with the opening 18 in the reaction part 2
(see FIG. 1) or into channel 32 connected with the opening 19 in
the guiding part 3 of the working cylinder 1.
Pressurized medium, for instance pressure air is introduced over
the extension 17 and the valve means alternately to the upper part
of the space created in the reaction part 2 and into the lower part
of the space created in the guiding part 3 of the working cylinder
1. Thus a straight line reciprocating movement of the piston 4 in
the working cylinder 1 is generated. If the piston 4 is in its
upper extreme position and the pressurized air starts to enter the
working cylinder 1, the air urges the piston 4 to move towards its
lower extreme position. Simultaneously a force F.sub.h of oppsoite
direction is generated, acting on the reaction part 2. The piston 4
strikes in the lower extreme position the head of the working tool
7. The top part of the piston 4 clears the gap 21 between the
reaction part 2 and the guiding part 3, so that the air can escape
from the space above the piston 4, simultaneously reducing pressure
in channel 31 so that the sliding plate 30 closes by overpressure
in channel 32 and cuts off the further supply of air to the opening
18 and opens access of air by way of channel 32 via the opening 19
below the piston 4 which is thereafter urged to move in a direction
towards its upper extreme position. Simultaneously a force F.sub.S
of oppsite direction is generated, acting on the guiding part 3 and
on the head of the working tool 7. In the course of operation of
the pneumatic impact tool periodical changes of pressure conditions
in the working cylinder 1 are created, generating periodic exciting
forces F.sub.h and F.sub.s acting on the reaction part 2 and on the
guiding part 3 of the working cylinder 1 respectively. The force
F.sub.h is however not transmitted to the body 8 in its whole
magnitude due to the action of the spring 9. A smaller force
F.sub.t acts therefore on the body 8, the magnitude of which
depends on the mutual position of the reaction part 2 and the body
8, furthermore as well as on the rigidity and on the damping
coefficient of the spring 9 and on the oscillating frequency. The
force F.sub.s acting on the head of the working tool 7 and on the
guiding part 3 is transmitted to the rock. The working tool 7 is
after impact of the piston 4 and after transfer of a part of the
impact energy to the rock repelled back with a certain
acceleration. Thus the spring 10 is compressed and a force F.sub.n
generated, part of which is transmitted to the body 8. The body 8
thus starts to oscillate due to the action of exciting forces
F.sub.n and F.sub.t. A force F.sub.r is transmitted to the casing 5
and to the handle 6 connected therewith, said force F.sub.r being
proportional to the deviation of the body 8 with respect to the
casing 5, and depending on the rigidity and on the damping
coefficient of the spring 11 and on the oscillating frequency. The
resulting oscillating movement of the handle 6 depends therefore on
the magnitude of the force F.sub.r and on the impedance of the hand
of the operator. It is possible to evaluate mathematically for what
masses of the individual oscillating parts and for what rigidities
of springs the force F.sub.r acting on the handle 6 and therefore
also the acceleration of the handle 6 will be a minimum.
The principle of construction of the pneumatic impact tool
according to this invention can be applied for all impact tools
with a straight line reciprocating movement of the piston, actuated
by a suitable pressure medium.
* * * * *