U.S. patent number 3,786,310 [Application Number 05/346,208] was granted by the patent office on 1974-01-15 for hybrid dc circuit breaker.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Hughes Aircraft Company. Invention is credited to Willis F. Long.
United States Patent |
3,786,310 |
Long |
January 15, 1974 |
HYBRID DC CIRCUIT BREAKER
Abstract
DC circuit breaker has both in-line and line-to-ground
components to limit in-line and line-to-ground voltages during load
breaking and fault clearing. Impedance insertion forces down
current.
Inventors: |
Long; Willis F. (Thousand Oaks,
CA) |
Assignee: |
Hughes Aircraft Company (Culver
City, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
23358411 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/346,208 |
Filed: |
March 29, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
361/10 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01H
33/596 (20130101); H02H 3/021 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01H
33/59 (20060101); H02H 3/02 (20060101); H02h
007/22 () |
Field of
Search: |
;317/11E,11C
;307/136 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Trammell; James D.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: MacAllister, Jr.; W. H. Dicke, Jr.;
Allen A.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A circuit breaker for connection between first and second lines
for the carrying of direct current and for the interruption of
current in said first line, comprising:
a switch in said first line between a first connection point and a
second connection point in said first line for opening said first
line between said first connection point and said second connection
point;
first means capable of conducting direct current and off-switching
direct current connected in parallel to said switch in said first
line for providing a parallel circuit to said first switch for
receiving current when said first switch is opened to permit said
first switch to deionize and for off-switching direct current
through said first means after said first switch has been
deionized;
second means for on-switching direct current and for absorbing
energy from direct current passing therethrough and for
off-switching direct current passing therethrough connected between
said second connection point and said second line so that voltage
between said second connection point and said second line can be
limited to be maintained below a predetermined value;
third means for absorbing energy from direct current passing
therethrough and for off-switching direct current connected between
said first connection point and said second means so that voltage
between said first and second connection points can be limited to
be maintained below a predetermined value.
2. The circuit breaker in claim 1 wherein said first means is a
crossed-field switch device connected between said first and second
connection points.
3. The circuit breaker of claim 2 wherein said second means is a
serial connection of a crossed-field switch device for
off-switching direct current and means for on-switching and
absorbing energy from direct current flowing therethrough.
4. The circuit breaker of claim 3 wherein said means for
on-switching and absorbing energy comprises an on-switching device
and a separate resistor.
5. The circuit breaker of claim 1 wherein said second means is a
serial connection of a crossed-field switch device for
off-switching direct current and means for on-switching and
absorbing energy from direct current flowing therethrough.
6. The circuit breaker of claim 5 wherein said means for
on-switching and absorbing energy comprises an on-switching device
and a separate resistor.
7. The circuit breaker of claim 1 wherein said third means is a
serial connection of a crossed-field switch device and a
resistor.
8. The circuit breaker of claim 3 wherein said third means is a
serial connection of a crossed-field switch device and a resistor,
said serial connection being connected at one end at said first
connection point and at the other end between the crossed-field
switch device of said second means and its energy-absorbing
means.
9. The circuit breaker of claim 5 wherein said third means is a
serial connection of a crossed-field switch device and a resistor,
said serial connection being connected at one end at said first
connection point and at the other end between the crossed-field
switch device of said second means and its energy-absorbing
means.
10. The circuit breaker of claim 1 wherein said circuit breaker has
its second connection point connected to a power supply and has its
first connection point connected to a load, said power supply and
load also being connected to said third connection point.
11. The circuit breaker of claim 7 wherein said circuit breaker has
its second connection point connected to a power supply and has its
first connection point connected to a load, said power supply and
load also being connected to said third connection point.
12. The circuit breaker of claim 8 wherein said circuit breaker has
its second connection point connected to a power supply and has its
first connection point connected to a load, said power supply and
load also being connected to said third connection point.
13. The circuit breaker of claim 9 wherein said circuit breaker has
its second connection point connected to a power supply and has its
first connection point connected to a load, said power supply and
load also being connected to said third connection point.
14. The circuit breaker of claim 1 further including means for
on-switching direct current and for absorbing energy from direct
current connected between said third means and said third
connection point.
15. The circuit breaker of claim 14 wherein said circuit breaker
has its second connection point connected to a power supply and has
its first connection point connected to a load, said power supply
and load also being connected to said third connection point.
Description
Background of the Invention
This invention is directed to a hybrid DC circuit breaker which
limits in-line and line-to-ground voltage.
The prior art consists of two fundamental configurations. In-line
circuit breakers are those wherein current to be interrupted is
diverted into a resistance in series with the load. One example of
this is the sequential switching circuit breaker of K. T. Lian
reissue patent RE-27,557. Another example is the series sequential
circuit breaker of M. A. Lutz patent 3,660,723.
The other fundamental configuration of the prior art is the
line-to-ground breaker wherein current is diverted into resistance
between the line and ground, and the in-line circuit is open.
Examples of this are A. N. Greenwood U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,390,305;
3,435,288; 3,476,978; and 3,489,951. The line-to-ground DC circuit
breaker has an in-line switch and a series combination of a switch
and a resistor connected to ground on each side of the in-line
switch. The disadvantage arises that the voltage applied across the
in-line switch is that sum of the voltage drop across the two
line-to-ground resistors. This can be avoided by shorting the load
side of the in-line switch to ground to eliminate the load side
voltage to the in-line switch. However, this is not really
acceptable in power systems.
Management of the voltage across components, both in-line and
line-to-ground, is required for a circuit breaker of maximum
utility. Furthermore, the circuit breaker should be able to open a
load circuit, as well as interrupt a fault. It is the combined
desirable objectives that the circuit breaker of this invention
seeks to attain.
SUMMARY
In order to aid in the understanding of this invention, it can be
stated in essentially summary form that is directed to a hybrid
circuit breaker which comprises a line switch for serial
interconnection between a power source and its load. The line
switch is paralleled by a shunt switch which permits the line
switch to open and deionize. Between the line side of the in-line
switch and the ground is connected a series combination of a switch
and a resistor with a connection point therebetween. Between the
load side of the in-line switch and the connection point is
connected a series combination of a switch and a resistor so that
voltages are limited during off-switching and current is forced
down.
It is thus an object of this invention to provide a hybrid circuit
breaker which is capable of off-switching a normal load or breaking
a fault. It is a further object to provide a hybrid circuit breaker
which limits the voltage across components, including
line-to-ground voltage, during all switching or fault breaking. It
is still another object to provide a hybrid circuit breaker wherein
no shorting to ground occurs. It is still another object to provide
hybrid circuit breaker which is capable of off-switching high
values of direct current against high voltages, so that load
breaking and fault protection is available for high power direct
current circuits.
Other objects and advantages of this invention will be understood
from a study of the following specifications, the claims and the
attached drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic circuit diagram of a high voltage DC system
showing the schematic arrangements of a high voltage DC hybrid
circuit breaker connected therein for load breaking and fault
protection;
FIGS. 2-4 are graphs showing voltages across various parts of the
circuit breaker during load breaking;
FIGS. 5-7 are graphs showing the current through various portions
of the circuit breaker during load breaking;
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing another species of the hybrid
circuit breaker of this invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
First referring to FIG. 1, an electric system 10 is shown therein.
The electric system comprises a power source 12 which is connected
through power line 14 and ground line 16 to a load 19. The hybrid
DC circuit breaker 18 is connected in line 14 and between line 14
and ground 16 to control the flow of power to the load. A power
system of this nature is disclosed in more detail in G. A. G.
Hofmann U.S. Pat. 3,558,960. That patent describes the power source
and load in more detail. Furthermore, that patent illustrates
switching can be accomplished in a transmission line by switch 10a,
and can be accomplished in a side tap arrangement from the main
transmission line to a tapped load. Circuit breaker 18 of the
present invention is capable of both line and side tap load
switching. Furthermore, it is capable of load off-switching as well
as fault breaking.
Circuit breaker 18 has in-line switch 20 connected serially in
power line 14 between connection points 1 and 2. In-line switch 20
can be a conventional mechanical switch which has a low impedance
when closed, and when open can hold off the peak voltages between
connection points 1 and 2. In view of the fact that the in-line
switch is in parallel with crossed-field switch device 22,
described in greater detail below, and it is necessary for such
crossed-field switch devices to have a voltage impressed
thereacross to begin conducting, it is desirable that the in-line
switch device 20 be capable of developing adequate arc voltage to
permit initiation of conduction in the crossed field switch device
22. At present, about one kilovolt is necessary to start
conduction. Therefore, in-line switch device 20 is preferably
capable of developing a substantial arc voltage drop. Any
conventional circuit breaker having these capabilities, such as a
magnetic blowout, long arc path circuit breaker, is useful in this
environment. Another particular structure which is useful is the
switch disclosed in N. E. Reed U.S. Pat. No. 3,750,061 U.S. Pat.
application Ser. No. 255,665 filed May 22, 1972.
Line 24 is connected from connection point 2 through connection
point 6 to connection point 3 on ground line 16. Similarly, line 26
is connected between connection point 1 through connection point 5
to connection point 4 on line 16. Capacitor 28 is connected between
lines 24 and 26 to control the rate of voltage rise when in-line
switch 20 or crossed-field switch device 22 are off-switched. As
previously stated, crossed-field switch device 22 is connected in
parallel to in-line switch 20, between lines 24 and 26.
Crossed-field switch device 22 is a switch device which is capable
of passing direct current and off-switching direct current against
high voltage. Crossed-field switch devices of this nature are
disclosed in K. T. Lian U.S. Pat. RE-27,557, M. A. Lutz and R. C.
Knechtli U.S. Pat. 3,638,061, R. E. Lund and G. A. G. Hofmann U.S.
Pat. 3,641,384, G. A. G. Hofmann U.S. Pat. 3,604,977, G. A. G.
Hofmann and R. C. Knechtli U.S. Pat. 3,558,960, G. A. G. Hofmann
U.S. Pat. 3,714,510, M. A. Lutz and G. A. G. Hofmann U.S. Pat.
3,678,289 and several improvements thereon. From the study of this
prior art, it is clear that crossed-field devices can carry large
values of direct current and off-switch against high voltages.
In particular illustrative value, the power source 12 is capable of
normal line voltages of 400 kilovolts at 2,000 amperes. These
values will be considered to be the per-unit in the illustration,
which is the 1 pu in this disclosure. For purposes of illustration,
the values are normalized, with 1 pu voltage sources and initial
currents. System inductance is shown lumped, and no transmission
line or filter effect are included in the discussion. The
non-linear resistors are considered ideal. With an overvoltage
value k = 1.5, the non-linear resistors are treated as 1.5 pu DC
sources in the voltage analysis.
For purposes of illustration, 1.5 pu is chosen as maximum
overvoltage. Quite often in modern power transmission practice, an
overload factor k of 1.7 is found. However, for purposes of this
illustration, a value of 1.5 is chosen for illustrative purposes.
If the equipment is designed for a different overvoltage factor,
that factor would, of course, be employed in designing the circuit
breaker for that system.
Modern non-linear resistors are structures which do not obey Ohm's
Law, but the value of resistance varies with the amount of current.
In the present case, a high resistance at low current and a lower
resistance at high current is desired. The ideal non-linear
resistance would have an infinite resistance value at zero current,
but would break down and commence conducting when its breakdown
voltage was reached. Modern non-linear resistors are made of
silicon carbide, and do not reach the ideal goal. However,
discussion of the present circuit breaker with ideal resistors
therein aids in ease of description. The voltage and current curves
would be less ideal, when a real non-linear resistor is
employed.
In the operation, as described below, during off-switching or fault
breaking, current is transferred from in-line switch 20 into
crossed-field switch device 22, by opening the switch 20 when
crossed-field switch device 22 is conditioned to conduct. After
in-line switch device 20 is opened and deionized, crossed-field
switch device 22 is turned off. If there is too much energy in the
circuit for a simple turnoff, a circuit can be connected and
paralleled to crossed-field switch device 22 which comprises a
series combination of another crossed-field switch device and an
energy-absorbing resistor, optionally of non-linear
characteristics. Such is shown in FIG. 8. In that case, when
crossed-field switch device 22 is turned off, the energy is reduced
by diverting the current through the energy-absorbing resistor.
Such additional energy-absorbing circuits are shown in K. T. Lian
patent RE-27,557 and in M. A. Lutz patent 3,660,723.
Serially connected in line 24 between connection point 2 and
connection point 3 are crossed-field switch device 30, resistor 32,
which is illustrated as being non-linear, and switch 34. Similarly,
connected in line 26 between connection point 1 and connection
point 4 is a series combination of crossed-field switch device 36,
resistor 38, which is illustrated as being non-linear, and switch
40. Capacitors 42 and 44 are respectively connected in parallel
around crossed-field switch devices 30 and 36 to control the change
of voltage with respect to time across the crossed-field switch
devices. Resistor 46, shown as being non-linear, is connected
between lines 24 and 26 at connection points 5 and 6.
Crossed-field switch devices 30 and 36 are identical to
crossed-field switch device 22, while switches 34 and 40 can be
identical to in-line switch 20. However, the requirements of
switches 34 and 40 are somewhat different than the requirements of
in-line switch 20, so they could be of different design.
Crossed-field switch devices, such as the devices 30 and 36 in the
present state of the art, cannot reliably turn on in the proper
mode when a voltage is initially impressed across them. For
example, if switch 34 were absent from the circuit of FIG. 1,
crossed-field switch device 30 would be connected directly between
the power line 14 and ground 16. Therefore, the entire 1 pu would
be impressed on the crossed-field device 30. If an attempt was made
to turn the crossed-field switch device 30 on under those
circumstances, conduction in the arc mode rather than glow mode
would sometimes result, so that it could not be turned off. Because
of this condition, in the present state of development of such
crossed-field switch devices, the switches 34 and 40 hold the power
source voltage off of crossed-field switch devices 30 and 36 until
their conduction is desired.
FIG. 2 illustrates the voltage between connection points 2 and 1
with respect to the time during off-switching. FIG. 3 illustrates
the voltage between connection points 2 and 3 with respect to time.
FIG. 4 illustrates the voltage between connection points 1 and 4
with respect to time. It is to be noted with respect to FIG. 4 that
the connection point 3 is at the same potential as the connection
point 4, therefore the curve is labeled as the voltage between
points 1 and 3. Furthermore, since the sum of the voltages around
the loop between the connection points 1, 2, 3, 4 and 1 must add up
to 0, the voltage between points 1 and 3 (FIG. 4) is the difference
between the voltages shown in FIGS. 3 and 2.
To illustrate the operation of the breaker, it is assumed that
in-line switch 20 is closed and there is normal current flow
therethrough at 1 pu with a 1 pu voltage drop across the load. This
is normal conduction, and load-breaking mode of operation will be
illustrated, as contrasted to fault-clearing. During normal
conduction, FIG. 2 illustrates the zero voltage drop across in-line
switch 20, between connection points 1 and 2, with the 1 pu voltage
drop between connection points 2 and 3, and connection points 1 and
3. It is seen that the voltage of FIG. 3 minus the voltage of FIG.
2 is the voltage of FIG. 4. At t.sub.o the commencement of
load-breaking, switches 34 and 40 are open, and crossed-field
switch devices 22, 30 and 36 have no voltage thereacross, but
crossed-field switch device is conditioned to conduct as soon as
sufficient voltage is applied thereto. At time t.sub.o in-line
switch 20 is opened and line current is transferred through
crossed-field switch device 22. The crossed-field switch device 22,
as presently known has about 500 volts drop, and such would not
show on the idealized voltage curves. From time t.sub.o to t.sub.1
in-line switch 20 is opened and deionized so that it can withstand
its rated 1.5 pu voltage.
At time t.sub.1 simultaneously, switches 34 and 40 are closed, and
crossed-field switch device 22 is off-switched. Crossed-field
devices 30 and 36 can be conditioned from t.sub.o to t.sub.1 to
conduct so that now, when switches 34 and 40 are closed, they
become conductive. The voltage across the breaker, as shown in FIG.
2, rises from t.sub.1 to t.sub.2 at a rate determined by the dv/dt
limiting capacitance 28. Assuming ideal non-linear resistors that
do not conduct until the voltage reaches 1.5 pu, the voltage rise
of FIG. 2 from t.sub.1 to t.sub.2 from 0 to 1.0 pu, is determined
by the voltage rate of rise-limiting capacitors, as previously
described. The capacitors must carry the current which was in the
crossed-field tubes until the resistors conduct. Line current
remains constant over this short time span, less than 1 ms.
As the voltage between connection points 2 and 3 reaches 1.5 pu at
time t.sub.2 as seen in FIG. 3, the voltage between these
connection points is clamped at 1.5 pu to limit the maximum voltage
difference between power line 14 and ground 16. Thus, interline
insulation is not overstressed. As the voltage between connection
points 2 and 1 rises, the voltage is taken across resistor 46 which
begins conducting at time t.sub.3 to clamp the voltage between
points 2 and 1 at 1.5 pu, as is seen in FIG. 1. By subtraction, the
voltage across resistor 38, between points 1 and 3, reduces to zero
so that resistor 38 never begins conducting. Switch 40 may just as
well have been left open. Thus, in the circuit interruption so far
described, the branch between connection points 4 and 5 is not
necessary. However, it is shown and is employed when the circuit
breaker operates the opposite way, such as when the source and the
load might be exchanged and it is necessary to separate the
reactance energy of both the line and load from the source. By this
means, voltage is limited to 1.5 pu across the breaker connection
points 1 and 2 and separately between breaker connection points 1
and 4 limiting the maximum voltage during off-switching.
With these voltages, the current is forced down from 1 pu, as is
shown in FIGS. 5, 6, and 7. The current in the loop from power
source 12 through line 14, through connection points 2, 6 and 3 and
back to power source is identified as I.sub.1 and is shown in FIG.
5. The current in the loop through load 19, and through connection
points 4, 3, 6, 5, 1 and back to the load is represented as current
I.sub.2 as is shown in FIG. 6. For purposes of analysis, both power
source 12 and load 19 are considered to be voltage sources valued
at 1.0 pu. As previously discussed, system inductance is shown
lumped, and no transmission line filter effects are included. The
conducting non-linear resistors are considered ideal and are
treated as 1.5 pu DC sources. Traversing the lefthand loop, it is
seen that 0.5 pu is impressed across inductor 46 and thus the
current will fall at a rate of 0.5 pu per-unit time, as indicated
in FIG. 5 where the interval from 3 to t.sub.4 is a time unit.
Traversing the righthand loop of I.sub.2 it is seen that the
effective voltage of load 18 algebraically added to the equivalent
voltages of non-linear resistors 32 and 46 is such that 1 pu
appears across inductor 48 so that the rate of current decrease is
1.0 pu per-unit of time. Therefore, the current in that loop drops
to 0 at time t.sub.4.
The current through resistor 32 is the difference between I.sub.1
and I.sub.2. As shown in FIG. 7, the current increases from zero at
t.sub.3 to 0.5 pu at t .sub.4. Then it drops back to zero in the
next time increment, ending at t.sub.5. FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate
that the energy absorbed in resistors 32 and 46 is equal in this
example.
Additional considerations applying to the circuit in relating this
analysis of the ideal circuit to a real circuit include the fact
that silicon carbide is not an ideal non-linear resistor. Its
non-ideal characteristics require surge-absorbing capacitance. An
appropriate location for this capacitance is between lines 24 and
26, such as capacitance 28. Thus, capacitor 28 should be calculated
to include surge capacity for this purpose. Additionally, in a real
circuit, where power source 12 is a rectifier and load 19 is an
inverter, the system controls would affect the actual voltages. For
example, the inverter controls would decrease the inverter voltage
with respect to time so that I.sub.2 would continue for a longer
time.
Finally, the interruption is completed by off-switching
crossed-field switch devices 30 and 36. At the same time or
slightly previously, switches 34 and 40 are opened so that
off-switching of the respective crossed-field devices extinguishes
the arcs in the switches 34 and 40. Switches 34 and 40 can be
triggered vacuum gaps instead of mechanical switch devices.
In fault clearing, the service is not so difficult as in load
breaking, because the voltage between lines 14 and 16 is at a
reduced value. In fault clearing, current at higher than 1 pu is to
be interrupted and reduced to zero without exceeding the 1.5 pu
voltage rating at any point in the circuit breaker. With the fault
on the right side of the breaker and the voltage between the
connection points 2 and 3 near zero, commencement of fault
interruption by the breaker permits the voltage to rise. As it
rises to 1.5 pu, it is clamped, as previously described. Similarly,
the line and load reactance causes a rise in voltage through the
right side of the breaker as current is reduced. Again, the voltage
between points 1 and 2 is limited to 1.5 pu, so that overvoltages
do not occur.
FIG. 8 illustrates circuit breaker 50 connected between power
source 52 and load 54. Connection is by means of power line 56 and
ground line 58. It is recognized that circuit breaker 50 is
identical to circuit breaker 18, except for two changes in detail.
Gaps 60 and 62 are employed therein in place of switches 34 and 40,
respectively. They are precision spark gaps which break down and
conduct when they reach a predetermined voltage. A suitable gap is
described in an article in IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Volume PAS-91 No. 5, September-October 1972, at pages
2104-2112 entitled "Separation of Gap Functions - A New Concept in
Station Class Lighting Arrestor Design" by Joseph C. Osterhout of
Westinghouse Electric Company, Bloomington, Indiana. The article
discusses pressurized preionized gaps with accurate voltage
breakdown repeatability. In circuit breaker 50, gap 60 holds off
the voltage to prevent conduction through that branch until the
voltage rises sufficiently above 1 pu, for example 1.5 pu, to cause
the spark gap to arc over and conduct. Once conducting, the voltage
drop across the branch is controlled by the current through the
non-linear resistor in series with the conducting spark gap.
Conduction continues until the crossed-field switch in that branch
is turned off. Thereupon, the precision spark gap can recover its
holdoff properties.
Another difference in detail between FIG. 8 and FIG. 1 is the
showing of additional impedance steps to absorb the energy of
diverting the line current into resistor 64. Resistor 64
corresponds to resistor 46 in FIG. 1. Two intermediate
resistor-crossed-field switch stages are illustrated. Crossed-field
switch 66 and its series resistor are connected in parallel to
resistor 64. Crossed-field switch 70 and its series resistor 72 are
also connected in parallel to resistor 64. These impedance stages
are successively switched off to successively increase impedance to
transfer the line current through resistor 64. In most cases, only
one such intermediate stage is expected to be needed. However, two
are shown as an example.
As a further alternative, a triggered vacuum gap could be employed
in each of the locations of gaps 60 and 62, shown in FIG. 8. In the
case of the triggered vacuum gap, it would not need to precisely
break down at a given voltage, but instead, triggering of
conduction in the gap would be controlled by appropriate voltage
sensors. In that way, the gap begins conducting at an appropriate
condition in the breaker. Such a gap is shown in J. M. Lafferty
U.S. Pat. No. 3,290,542.
As still another possible alternative structure, instead of a
serial connection of an on-switching device such as switch 34 or
gap 60, together with a resistor such as non-linear resistor 32 or
74 and an off-switching device such as crossed-field switch device
30 or 76, a single unit which accomplishes these functions could be
employed. For example, a lightning arrestor structure is a
prospective candidate structure for employment in such use.
However, the presently known DC lightning arrestor structures are
incapable of adequate energy absorption for the present purpose,
and furthermore, they do not reliably isolate when the current is
turned off. Thus, as presently known, they are not practical for
performing this service. However, further development in that art
may produce DC lightning arrestors of accurate onswitching,
adequate energy absorption, sealing off at a proper voltage and
proper voltage holdoff recovery when current is stopped.
This invention having been described in its preferred embodiment,
it is clear that it is susceptible to numerous modifications within
the ability of those skilled in the art and without the exercise of
the inventive faculty. Accordingly, the scope of this invention is
defined by the scope of the following claims.
* * * * *