U.S. patent number 3,784,745 [Application Number 05/133,229] was granted by the patent office on 1974-01-08 for method and apparatus for providing electronic sound clarification for aurally handicapped persons.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Shalako Resource Systems, Inc.. Invention is credited to William P. Stearns.
United States Patent |
3,784,745 |
Stearns |
January 8, 1974 |
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING ELECTRONIC SOUND CLARIFICATION
FOR AURALLY HANDICAPPED PERSONS
Abstract
A method is described for determining the frequency response
curve or characteristic to be incorporated into sound amplification
apparatus utilized by aurally handicapped persons. An auditory
threshold is first determined as a function of frequency utilizing
pink or white noise passed through 1/3 octave bandpass filters.
Subsequently, comfort level response is determined (in the same
manner) with the loudness increased for each nominal frequency band
until the patient indicates distinct discomfort, the loudness being
then decreased until the patient considers the level to be
comfortable. Examination of the curves thus obtained may reveal one
or more 1/3 octave frequency bands at which dynamic range, the
difference between the threshold and comfort levels, is abnormally
reduced. Playback apparatus is then adjusted generally to conform
to the comfort level curve. Preferably, these tests and the
playback apparatus comprehend a broad frequency range on the order
of 100 hz to 10 kHz. The adjustment of the playback apparatus may
subsequently be altered in accordance with predetermined principles
in order to enhance the aurally handicapped person's capacity to
understand the spoken language.
Inventors: |
Stearns; William P.
(Scottsdale, AZ) |
Assignee: |
Shalako Resource Systems, Inc.
(Scottsdale, AZ)
|
Family
ID: |
22457587 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/133,229 |
Filed: |
April 12, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
73/585;
381/320 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04R
25/502 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H04R
25/00 (20060101); A61b 005/12 (); H04r
025/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;179/1N,1D,17R
;181/.59 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Cooper; William C.
Assistant Examiner: Leaheey; Jon Bradford
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lyon & Lyon
Claims
I claim:
1. In a method for measuring human auditory deficiency as an aid in
prescribing compensatory amplification for an individual through
use of selective audio amplification means capable of supplying a
complex audio signal to the ear of said individual, and wherein
said amplification means includes a plurality of independently
adjustable circuits for selectively varying the level of the signal
passed by each in adjacent passbands, comprising the steps of
determining the comfort level frequency response of the individual
by supplying to the ear of the individual a variable level audio
signal in discrete frequency spectrum increments including
1. increasing the level of signals passed by a first of said
circuits, with the remaining of said circuits being set for a
minimum signal passage level, until audio signals within a first
limited frequency spectrum reach a level of discomfort, and then
decreasing the level of signals passed by the first of said
circuits until audio signals are at a comfort level, and
2. repeating this sequence for each of the remainder of said
circuits, and
setting selective audio amplification means to provide an equalized
response approximating said comfort level frequency response, and
with de-emphasis of a resonance frequency spectrum, said resonance
frequency spectrum being defined by a marked deviation of the
comfort level frequency response in a frequency spectrum wherein
spectral components of speech generally are concentrated, to
minimize sound saturation of the ear of the individual being tested
and thereby emphasize spectral conponents for clarifying speech
discrimination.
2. In a method as in claim 1 including the additional step of
supplying audio signals in the form of monosyllabic words to the
ear of said individual through selective audio amplification means
adjusted in accordance with said last-defined step to ascertain the
number of words correctly identified by the individual.
3. A method as in claim 1 wherein
said de-emphasis of a resonant frequency spectrum is achieved by
providing attenuation, and each resonance frequency spectrum is so
de-emphasized.
4. A method as in claim 1 wherein
said de-emphasis of a resonance frequency spectrum is achieved by
attenuation.
5. A method as in claim 1 wherein
each said limited frequency spectrum is a frequency range of less
than one octave.
6. A method as in claim 1 wherein
each said limited frequency spectrum is a frequency range of
one-third octave.
7. A method as in claim 1 including
determining a threshold frequency response of the individual by
supplying to the ear of the individual a variable level audio
signal in discrete frequency spectrum increments including
1. increasing the level of signals passed by a first of said
circuits, with the remaining of said circuits being set for a
minimum signal passage level, until audio signals within a first
limited frequency spectrum determined by the passband of said first
circuit are heard by the individual, and
2. repeating this latter sequence for each of the remainder of said
circuits, and
said equalized response is attenuated in a spectrum thereof wherein
the dynamic range is narrow, said dynamic range being defined as
the difference between the threshold frequency response and the
comfort level frequency response.
8. A method as in claim 7 wherein
said equalized response curve is attenuated in a spectrum wherein
the dynamic range is approximately 10 db and less.
9. In a method for measuring human auditory deficiency as an aid in
prescribing compensatory amplification for an individual through
use of selective audio amplification means capable of supplying a
complex audio signal to the ear of said individual, and wherein
said amplification means includes a plurality of independently
adjustable circuits for selectively varying the level of the signal
passed by each in adjacent passbands, comprising the steps of
determining a threshold frequency response of the individual by
supplying to the ear of the individual a variable level audio
signal in discrete frequency spectrum increments including
1. increasing the level of signals passed by a first of said
circuits, with the remaining of said circuits being set for a
minimum signal passage level, until audio signals within a first
limited frequency spectrum determined by the passband of said first
circuit are heard by the individual, and
2. repeating this sequence for each of the remainder of said
circuits,
determining the comfort level frequency response of the individual
by again supplying to the ear of the individual a variable level
audio signal in discrete frequency spectrum increments
including
1. increasing the level of signals passed by a first of said
circuits, with the remaining of said circuits being set for a
minimum signal passage level, until audio signals within a first
limited frequency spectrum reach a level of discomfort, and then
decreasing the level of signals passed by the first of said
circuits until audio signals are at a comfort level, and
2. repeating this latter sequence for each of the remainder of said
circuits, and
setting selective audio amplification means to provide an equalized
response approximating said comfort level frequency response, and
with de-emphasis of a resonance frequency spectrum, said resonance
frequency spectrum being defined by a marked deviation of the
comfort level frequency response in a frequency spectrum wherein
spectral components of speech generally are concentrated, to
minimize sound saturation of the ear of the individual being tested
and thereby emphasize spectral components for clarifying speech
discrimination.
10. In a method as in claim 9 including the additional step of
supplying audio signals in the form of monosyllabic words to the
ear of said individual through selective audio amplifation means
adjusted in accordance with said last-defined step to ascertain the
number of words correctly identified by the individual.
11. A method as in claim 9 wherein
said de-emphasis of a resonant frequency spectrum is achieved by
providing attenuation, and each resonance frequency spectrum is so
de-emphasized.
12. A method as in claim 9 wherein
said de-emphasis of a resonance frequency spectrum is achieved by
attenuation.
13. A method as in claim 9 wherein
said equalized response is attenuated in a spectrum thereof wherein
the dynamic range is narrow, said dynamic range being defined as
the difference between the threshold frequency response and the
comfort level frequency response.
14. A method as in claim 9 wherein
said equalized response curve is attenuated in a spectrum wherein
the dynamic range is approximately 10 db and less.
15. A method as in claim 9 wherein
said audio signals comprise noise signals.
16. A method as in claim 9 wherein
each said limited frequency spectrum is a frequency range of less
than one octave.
17. A method as in claim 16 wherein
each said limited frequency spectrum is a frequency range of
one-third octave.
18. In a method for measuring human auditory deficiency as an aid
in prescribing compensatory amplification for an individual through
use of selective audio amplification means capable of supplying a
complex audio signal to the ear of said individual, and wherein
said amplification means includes a plurality of independently
adjustable circuits for selectively varying the level of the signal
passed by each in adjacent passbands, comprising the steps of
determing a threshold frequency response of the individual by
supplying to the ear of the individual a variable level audio
signal in discrete frequency spectrum increments including
1. increasing the level of signals passed by a first of said
circuits, with the remaining of said circuits being set for a
minimum signal passage level, until audio signals within a first
limited frequency spectrum determined by the passband of said first
circuit are heard by the individual, and
2. repeating this sequence for each of the remainder of said
circuits,
plotting said threshold frequency response as a curve,
determining the comfort level frequency response of the individual
by again supplying to the ear of the individual a variable level
audio signal in discrete frequency spectrum increments
including
1. increasing the level of signals passed by a first of said
circuits, with the remaining of said circuits being set for a
minimum signal passage level, until audio signals within a first
limited frequency spectrum reach a level of discomfort, and then
decreasing the level of signals passed by the first of said
circuits until audio signals are at a comfort level, and
2. repeating this latter sequence for each of the remainder of said
circuits,
plotting said comfort level frequency response as a curve,
examining said comfort level frequency response curve for a
resonance spectrum, said resonance spectrum being evidenced by a
marked deviation of the comfort level frequency response in a
frequency range wherein spectral components of speech generally are
concentrated, and
setting selective audio amplification means to provide an equalized
response lying between said curves and and approximating said
comfort level frequency response curve, but with de-emphasis of
said resonance frequency spectrum to minimize sound saturation of
the ear of the individual being tested for thereby emphasizing
spectral components for clarifying speech discrimination.
19. In a method as in claim 18 including the additional step of
supplying audio signals in the form of monosyllabic words to the
ear of said individual through selective audio amplification means
adjusted in accordance with said equalized response to ascertain
the number of words correctly identified by the individual.
20. A method as in claim 18 wherein
said curves are examined to determined any area of narrow dynamic
range, said dynamic range being defined as the difference between
the threshold frequency response and the comfort level frequency
response, and
said equalized response being attenuated in a spectrum thereof
wherein said dynamic range is narrow.
21. A method as in claim 20 wherein
said equalized response curve is attenuated in a spectrum wherein
the dynamic range is approximately 10 db and less.
22. In a method for measuring human auditory deficiency as an aid
in prescribing compensatory amplification for an individual through
use of selective audio amplification means capable of supplying a
complex audio signal to the ear of said individual, and wherein
said amplification means includes a plurality of independently
adjustable circuits for selectively varying the level of the signal
passed by each in adjacent passbands, comprising the steps of
determining a threshold frequency response of the individual by
supplying to the ear of the individual a variable level audio
signal in discrete frequency spectrum increments including
1. increasing the level of signals passed by a first of said
circuits, with the remaining of said circuits being set for a
minimum signal passage level, until audio signals within a first
limited frequency spectrum determined by the passband of said first
circuit are heard by the individual, and
2. repeating this sequence for each of the remainder of said
circuits,
determining the comfort level frequency response of the individual
by again supplying to the ear of the individual a variable level
audio signal in discrete frequency spectrum increments
including
1. increasing the level of signals passed by a first of said
circuits, with the remaining of said circuits being set for a
minimum signal passage level, until audio signals within a first
limited frequency spectrum reach a level of discomfort, and then
decreasing the level of signals passed by the first of said
circuits until audio signals are at a comfort level, and
2. repeating this latter sequence for each of the remainder of said
circuits, and
setting selective audio amplification means to provide an equalized
response approximating said comfort level frequency response, said
equalized response being attenuated in a spectrum thereof wherein
the dynamic range is narrow, said dynamic range being defined as
the difference between the threshold frequency response and the
comfort level frequency response.
23. A method as in claim 22 wherein
said equalized response includes de-emphasis of a resonance
frequency spectrum to minimize sound saturation of the ear of the
individual being tested and thereby emphasize spectral components
for clarifying speech discrimination, said resonance frequency
spectrum being defined by a marked deviation of the comfort level
frequency response in a frequency spectrum wherein spectral
components of speech generally are concentrated.
24. In a method for measuring human auditory deficiency as an aid
in prescribing compensatory amplification for an individual through
the use of selective audio amplification means for supplying a
complex audio signal to the ear of said individual, and wherein
said amplification means includes a plurality of independently
adjustable circuits having adjacent passbands for selectively
varying the level of the signal passed thereby and providing said
audio signal, comprising the steps of
determining the threshold frequency response of the individual and
plotting a curve thereof by setting a first of said circuits for
minimum attenuation and the remaining of said circuits for maximum
attenuation, increasing the gain of said first circuit until audio
signals are heard, and repeating the sequence for each of said
circuits,
determining a comfort level frequency response of the individual
and plotting a curve thereof by setting a first of said circuits
for maximum signal passage and the remaining of said circuits for
maximum attenuation, increasing the level of the audio signal until
the individual discerns distinct discomfort, reducing the level of
said ausio signal to a level of comfort, and repeating these steps
for each of the remaining circuits,
examining the curve of said comfort level response and detecting
any spectrum area of resonance evidenced by a significant curve
deviation in the level of said comfort level response, and
examining the response of said individual to audio signals wherein
the spectrum of said audio signals have been de-emphasized at said
area of resonance to minimize sound saturation of the individual
and thereby emphasize the spectral components of said audio signals
required for speech discrimination.
25. A method as in claim 24 wherein
the spacing between said threshold curve and said comfort level
curve represents dynamic range, and the level of said audio signals
is de-emphasized in a spectrum thereof where said dynamic range is
approximately 10 db and less.
26. A method as in claim 25 wherein
said circuits provide bandpass increments of less than one
octave.
27. A method as in claim 26 wherein
said circuits provide bandpass increments of one-third octave each.
Description
This invention relates to the sound amplification arts and, more
particularly, to method and apparatus for clarifying the sounds
comprehended by aurally handicapped persons.
Electronic hearing aids have typically been designed to provide
amplification over a frequency spectrum of approximately 200 hz to
3 kHz. The use of this particular spectrum has been based upon
certain tests carried out following the Second World War which
resulted in information being published that concluded such a
spectrum to be generally optimum for electronic amplification
devices to compensate for hearing losses. Recently, however, more
advanced tests have indicated that such a limited spectrum may not
be optimum for speech discrimination purposes, naturalness of
sounds, comfort, and other factors. Nonetheless, electronic hearing
aid devices providing merely a broader amplification spectrum do
not provide a radical improvement for several reasons; viz.:
1. The ear's natural sensitivity (or physically impaired
sensitivity) may vary considerably over a broad frequency spectrum,
and a radical change in sensitivity to sound may be observed at
closely adjacent frequencies substantially less than an octave
apart;
2. A relatively flat, broadband response amplifies noise or
undefined signals indiscriminately, thus reducing one's capacity to
listen selectively to wanted signals such as speech.
3. Each person's auditory threshold sensitivity and comfort level
response is different, and the frequency response characteristic
must therefore be shaped to accommodate each person's (and often
each ear's) particular response; and
4. Electronic amplification adjustments are not provided for
significant amplitude changes within the broadband frequency gain
response; hence, acoustic discrimination over narrow band segments
cannot be realized.
Some consideration has been given in the prior art to the broad
concept of adjusting the frequency response of amplification
apparatus to the threshold frequency response curve of an
individual. One may refer, by way of example, to U. S. Pat. No.
1,611,130 to Knudsen et al., U. S. Pat. No. 1,659,965 to Tillyer,
U. S. Pat. No. 2,003,875 to Balbi, and U. S. Pat. No. 2,112,569 to
Lybarger. I have determined, however, that it is necessary to
consider several factors ignored or dealt with incompletely by the
prior art in order to achieve meaningful improvement in the ability
of the patient to understand and discriminate sounds. First, a
tailored response curve for the playback apparatus associated with
an individual should generally conform to a comfort level curve
rather than the threshold curve. Second, any noted reduction in
dynamic range, the difference between the threshold and comfort
level curves, should be dealt with by attenuating response of the
playback apparatus in those frequency bands at which such reduced
dynamic range is observed. Third, both the testing and playback
apparatus should be substantially more broadband than is currently
thought necessary; and fourth, the tests should be carried out and
the playback apparatus adjusted in increments of substantially less
than one octave, preferably on the order of one-third octave.
Further, in conducting the threshold and comfort level tests, I
have determined that more meaningful and repeatable results are
achieved if the source sound generator issues pink or white noise
of about 1/3 octave band width rather than a pure tone centered
within the band under consideration.
It is a broad object of my invention to provide an improved method
and apparatus for testing aurally handicapped persons.
It is another object of my invention to provide adjustable test and
adjustable playback apparatus which can be altered in accordance
with test results to achieve a specially tailored response curve in
the playback apparatus affording significant sound discrimination
or clarification to the user.
It is a more specific object of my invention to provide such
apparatus in which tests are carried out and playback apparatus
adjusted in increments of less than one octave and across a broad
audio spectrum.
The subject matter of the invention is particularly pointed out and
distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification.
The invention, however, both as to organization and method of
operation, may best be understood by reference to the following
description taken in connection with the accompanying drawing of
which:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the test apparatus utilized in the
present invention to obtain the audio information according to an
individual's hearing response;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the playback apparatus utilized to
test the improvement realized in an individual's hearing in
accordance with the method of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a graph setting out the response curves of a specific
individual; and
2 as 4 is a graph illustrating the adjusted response curve
incorporated into the playback apparatus of FIG. 2as a result of
the observation recorded in FIG. 3.
FIG. 1 illustrates, in simplified block diagram form, the
organization of the test equipment utilized in securing information
on the hearing response of a test individual to the extent
determined necessary to practice the method of the present
invention. A pink or white noise generator 1 is coupled to a 1/3
octave filter set 2 which consists of a plurality of 1/3 octave
bandpass filters 3 disposed in parallel and comprehends a normal
frequency range of at least 100 hz to 10 kHz. Each of the 1/3
octave filters 3 has the facility for continuously adjusting the
amplitude of the signal passing therethrough plus or minus 20 db.
The output from the 1/3 octave filter set 2 is impressed on the
input terminals of a broadband audio amplifier 4 which drives a
high grade speaker 5 at an intensity determined by gain control 9.
An individual under test, represented by the ear 6, is seated
within an audition room to receive the audio output issuing from
the speaker 5. Additionally, a broadband microphone 7 is coupled to
an audio level meter 8 for monitoring the intensity of sound
issuing from the speaker 5 and intercepted by the ear 6.
By way of example only, the pink noise generator 1 may consist of a
General Radio Type 1382 Random Noise Generator, the 1/3 octave
filter set 2 may be an Altec-Lansing 9062A Graphic Equalizer or a
Hewlett-Packard 8056A Filter Set, the microphone 7 may be an AKG
Model D224E, and the audio level meter may be a General Radio Type
1565A. Both the amplifier 4 and the high grade speaker 5 may be
conventional broadband frequency units of the type well known in
the audio field.
Referring simultaneously to FIGS. 1 and 3, either the threshold
sensitivity curve or the comfort level curve may be run first. The
sensitivity curve can be ascertained by testing the individual in
1/3 octave steps commencing with 125 hz and continuing through
8,000 hz. These tests are carried out in accordance with well known
principles and, in fact, pure tones can be utilized in each
instance although it is generally established that narrow band
noise, being a complex signal, more closely resembles speech than a
pure tone resembles speech and is therefore more valid. Hence, pink
or white noise generator signals are passed through the narrow
bandpass filters 3 with the bandpass filter centering on the
nominal frequency being adjusted for minimum attenuation and all
others adjusted for maximum attenuation. Briefly, at each nominal
frequency setting, the gain control 9 is gradually increased from a
nominal setting until the individual being tested first discerns
the sound.
The comfort level curve is determined in a somewhat different
manner although the same equipment configuration is utilized. The
comfort level test is conducted at intervals of frequency
approximating one-third octave commencing at least as low as 100 hz
and proceeding upwards to 8 or 10 kHz. For each nominal frequency
test, the corresponding 1/3 octave filter 3 is advanced to the
maximum signal pass position while all other 1/3 octave filters are
adjusted for maximum attenuation. The gain control 9 is then
advanced until the individual being tested indicates distinct
discomfort after which the gain control 9 is gradually decreased
until the individual indicates the sound is no longer intolerably
loud and can be accommodated comfortably.
During both the threshold sensitivity test and the comfort level
test, the reading of the audio level meter 8 is observed for each
test increment and recorded to derive the curves presented in FIG.
3.
Once the comfort level curve has been established, an equalized
response curve, FIG. 3, may be configured into the playback
apparatus of FIG. 2 by adjusting each 1/3 octave filter 13 of the
1/3 octave filter set 12 to closely approximate the comfort level
curve. The playback apparatus of FIG. 2 consists of a broadband
microphone 17 coupled to the 1/3 octave filter set 12 which shapes
the sound intercepted by the microphone 17 to the equalized
response curve, and a broadband amplifier 14 driving a high grade
speaker 15. An audio level meter 18 monitors the sound level
intercepted by the microphone 17 during playback tests.
Utilizing the equalized response curve shown in FIG. 3, tests
indicate a modest improvement in the ability of the individual to
distinguish the monosyllabic words in the phonetically balanced
word lists included in the well known C.I.D. Auditory Test W-22.
The improvement observed, however, was not deemed entirely
satisfactory, and the reason was discovered to be narrow dynamic
range such as that amounting to only about 5 db, observed at 3,150
hz in the individual whose curves are presented in FIG. 3.
An adjusted comfort level curve, taking into account the
individual's dynamic range characteristics, is shown in FIG. 4. The
adjusted comfort level curve was derived by boosting the playback
system response approximately 5 db for the frequencies below the
individual's resonance point at which the dynamic range was
previously too restrictive. No boost was made above the
individual's resonance point because, as will be apparent from FIG.
3, the dynamic range remains restricted at the higher frequencies.
A net effect of the boosted curve is to further attenuate
frequencies near the individual's resonance point and thus preclude
sound saturation at such frequencies and, hence, degraded speech
discrimination. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the
adjusted equalized response curve presented in FIG. 4 can be just
as readily achieved, and with some equipment more readily achieved,
by attenuating the playback apparatus response at the individual's
resonance point.
Utilizing the adjusted equalized response curve, the individual
whose curves are presented in FIGS. 3 and 4 scored remarkably
higher in the previously referenced C.I.D. Auditory Test W-22.
Specifically, the individual's ability to distinguish the spoken
words increased from 60 percent to 84 percent, and the words missed
were done so much more narrowly than in the response tests carried
out with the playback apparatus adjusted for flat response.
It will be understood that the curves presented in FIGS. 3 and 4
are actual test results of an individual and that the curves for
each individual are very nearly unique requiring specific
attention. Other observed individuals have been deemed to have a
plurality of response points at which the dynamic range is too
narrow and which must be accommodated in reaching an adjusted
equalized response curve in the tailored playback apparatus which
will afford the individual the ability to distinguish and clarify
sounds. It is fundamentally necessary to understand that the
comfort level tests must be carried out in increments of less than
an octave, preferably on the order of one-third octave, to detect
any points along the spectrum at which abnormally narrow dynamic
range occurs. Further, it is necessary to carry out these tests
over a broad audio spectrum, and the playback apparatus must be
capable of achieving an adjusted equalized response curve closely
resembling the adjusted comfort level curve across much of the
audio spectrum.
While the principles of the invention have now been made clear in
an illustrative embodiment, there will be immediately obvious to
those skilled in the art many modifications of structure,
arrangement, proportions, the elements, materials, and components,
used in the practice of the invention which are particularly
adapted for specific environments and operating requirements
without departing from those principles.
* * * * *