U.S. patent number 3,782,076 [Application Number 05/247,983] was granted by the patent office on 1974-01-01 for process for reducing the arsenic content of gaseous hydrocarbon streams by use of supported lead oxide.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Gulf Research & Development Company. Invention is credited to Norman L. Carr, Franklin E. Massoth, Donald L. Stahlfeld, John E. Young, Jr..
United States Patent |
3,782,076 |
Carr , et al. |
January 1, 1974 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
PROCESS FOR REDUCING THE ARSENIC CONTENT OF GASEOUS HYDROCARBON
STREAMS BY USE OF SUPPORTED LEAD OXIDE
Abstract
A process for reducing the arsenic content of a gaseous
hydrocarbon stream by contacting the stream with a sorbent
comprising an oxide of lead dispersed upon a supporting
material.
Inventors: |
Carr; Norman L. (The Hague,
NL), Massoth; Franklin E. (Middlesex Township, Butler
County, PA), Stahlfeld; Donald L. (Glenshaw, PA), Young,
Jr.; John E. (Middlesex Township, Butler County, PA) |
Assignee: |
Gulf Research & Development
Company (Pittsburgh, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
22937166 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/247,983 |
Filed: |
April 27, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
95/133;
208/88 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B01D
53/46 (20130101); C07C 7/148 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B01D
53/46 (20060101); C07C 7/148 (20060101); C07C
7/00 (20060101); B01d 053/04 () |
Field of
Search: |
;55/48,73,74,179,387
;196/44,46 ;208/88,91 ;423/210,229,234,240 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Hart; Charles N.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Meyer Neishloss et al.
Claims
We claim:
1. A process for reducing the arsenic content of a gaseous
hydrocarbon containing feedstream which comprises contacting said
feedstream with a sorbent dispersed upon a supporting material,
said sorbent comprising lead oxide.
2. A process as recited in claim 1 wherein said supporting material
is a high surface area alumina.
3. A process according to claim 2 wherein said lead oxide is
PbO.
4. A process as recited in claim 2 wherein said hydrocarbons in
said feedstream have from one to five carbon atoms per
molecule.
5. A process as recited in claim 4 wherein said hydrocarbon
feedstream includes oelfins and water vapor.
6. A process as recited in claim 5 wherein said contacting takes
place at a temperature in the range of 50.degree.F. to
400.degree.F.
7. A process for reducing the arsenic content of a gaseous
hydrocarbon containing feedstream containing arsenic in amounts in
excess of 20 ppb, which process comprises contacting said
feedstream with a sorbent dispersed on a supporting material, said
sorbent comprising lead oxide.
8. A process as recited in claim 7 wherein said supporting material
is a high surface area alumina.
9. A process as recited in claim 8 wherein said hydrocarbons in
said feedstream have from one to five carbon atoms per
molecule.
10. A process according to claim 9 wherein said lead oxide is
PbO.
11. A process as recited in claim 9 wherein said hydrocarbon
feedstream includes olefins and water vapor.
12. A process as recited in claim 11 wherein said contacting takes
place at a temperature in the range of 80.degree. to
250.degree.F.
13. A process as recited in claim 12 wherein said arsenic content
of said feedstream after contacting is less than 10 ppb.
14. A process as recited in claim 10 wherein said arsenic content
of said feedstream after treating is less than 2 ppb.
15. A process in accordance with claim 7 wherein the gaseous
hydrocarbon feedstream is a commercial FCC absorber gas.
16. A process in accordance with claim 15 wherein the absorber gas
has a composition comprising:
17. A process for reducing the arsenic content of a gaseous
hydrocarbon containing feedstream containing arsenic in amounts in
excess of 20 ppb, which process comprises contacting said
feedstream with a sorbent dispersed on a supporting material,
having a surface area in excess of 50 m.sup.2 /g, said sorbent
consisting of lead oxide.
18. A process according to claim 17 wherein said supporting
material is alumina having a surface area from 150-350 m.sup.2 /g.
Description
This invention relates to the removal of arsenic from gaseous
streams and more particularly to a process for reducing the arsenic
content of a gaseous hydrocarbon stream by the use of an oxide of
lead.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Catalytic cracking is one of the principal methods for refining
petroleum fractions to recover more valuable hydrocarbon products
such as gasoline. The unit in which the cracking operation takes
place generally employs a fluidized bed and thus is termed a fluid
catalytic cracking (FCC) unit. A variety of lower boiling products
in gaseous form are discharged from the FCC unit and these are
usually further treated to recover separate hydrocarbon fractions,
e.g. ethylene. This further treatment of FCC vapors may, as in the
case of the hydrogenation of acetylene, involve the use of a noble
metal catalyst. As is well known, nobel metal catalysts are rapidly
deactivated by feedstock impurities such as arsenic. It thus
becomes desirable to reduce the arsenic content of the FCC gases to
the lowest possible level before subjecting them to further
treatment.
It should be noted that the exact form in which arsenic is present
in FCC gases is difficult to determine. It is known, however, that
FCC gases in which arsenic can be detected cause the aforesaid
deleterious effects upon a noble metal catalyst. Although it is
believed that a major portion of the arsenic contained in the gases
is present as arsine (AsH.sub.3), the term "arsenic" as used herein
is intended to include arsenic in any combined gaseous form.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
It is well known that arsenic in gaseous form is a highly toxic
substance. Workers in the gas mask art have suggested the use of
activated charcoal impregnated with a metal or metal oxide such as
lead or lead oxide as a material through which air (or other
oxygen-containing gases) may be passed for the removal of arsenic.
Exemplary of this proposal is U. S. Pat. No. 1,520,437.
It has been found more recently that the presence of arsenic in
gasolines which are treated by contact with a noble metal
containing catalyst causes a permanent deactivation of the
catalyst. Suggestions have been made in the art to pretreat
petroleum fractions to remove arsenic by use of a wide range of
materials such as a lignite-based activated carbon (U. S. Pat. No.
3,542,669); silica gel impregnated with sulfuric acid (U. S. Pat.
No. 3,093,574); aluminum silicate (U. S. Pat. No. 2,939,833); or a
salt of a metal not higher than copper in the electromotive series
of metals (U. S. Pat. No. 2,781,297). Since lead is above copper in
the electromotive series of metals, the last-mentioned U.S. Pat.
No. (2,781,297) would appear to discourage the use of lead in
removing arsenic from petroleum feedstreams. Moreover, the art also
suggests that lead is an impurity which can contaminate the
reforming catalysts employed in petroleum fraction conversion
processes; see U. S. Pat. Nos. 2,769,770 and 3,093,574.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It has been discovered that a suitably dispersed material
comprising an oxide of lead will directly remove arsenic from
gaseous hydrocarbon streams. For the purposes of this application
the lead oxide will be termed a "sorbent," although that term is
not intended to suggest that the arsenic removal is accomplished by
physical adsorption. While not wishing to be bound by any
particular theory, it is believed that some chemical reaction is
involved between the arsenic and the sorbent wherein lead-arsenic
compounds such as Pb.sub.3 As.sub.2 O.sub.6 may be formed. At a
minimum, it is believed that the removal of arsenic is accomplished
by chemisorption; that is, the arsenic forms bonds with the surface
atoms of the sorbent that are of comparable strength with ordinary
chemical bonds and stronger than the bonds formed in physical
adsorption.
Surprisingly, the dispersed sorbent will withstand an acceptable
loading of arsenic before breakthrough when the arsenic is present
in a gaseous light hydrocarbon stream containing both olefins and
water vapor. While many materials will function to remove arsenic
from admixture with inert gases such as argon and such materials
remain active for reasonable loadings of arsenic, most of these
materials fail quickly in the removal of arsenic from light
hydrocarbon gases such as the gases obtained from FCC units or
refinery olefin streams such as streams consisting essentially of
ethylene or propylene. In this context, the term "break-through"
means the passage of arsenic beyond or downstream of the substance
intended to remove it and is usually expressed as a percentage of
the arsenic not removed in relation to the arsenic content of the
charge stock.
The present invention provides a process for reducing the arsenic
content of a gaseous hydrocarbon feedstream which comprises
contacting said feedstream with a sorbent dispersed upon a
supporting material, said sorbent comprising an oxide of lead. The
invention further provides that the supporting material is
preferably selected from a high surface area refractory metal oxide
or mixtures of refractory metal oxides and most preferably a high
surface area alumina. It is further provided that the hydrocarbons
in the feedstream have from one to five carbon atoms per molecule
with minor amounts of about two percent or less of higher carbon
atom molecules such as C.sub.6. Preferably, the hydrocarbons in the
feedstream have from one to three carbon atoms with minor amounts
of about 10 percent or less of hydrocarbons having from four to six
carbon atoms. The feedstream normally includes olefins and water
vapor. Preferably, the feedstream is substantially free of sulfur
compounds. The arsenic content of the feedstream is generally in
excess of 20 ppb and following contact with the sorbent the arsenic
content of the feedstream is reduced to less than 20 ppb,
preferably less than 10 ppb and more preferably less than 2 ppb. In
this application the term "ppb" means "parts per billion" and "ppm"
means "parts per million," and such parts are parts by volume
unless otherwise indicated. Preferably, the present invention
provides that the feedstream is contacted with the sorbent at a
temperature in the range of 50.degree. to 400.degree.F. and more
preferably in the range of 80.degree. to 250.degree.F.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The charge stock for treatment in accordance with the invention is
a gaseous hydrocarbon feedstream wherein the hydrocarbons
preferably have from one to three carbon atoms per molecule and
which feedstream contains aresenic as an impurity, typically in an
amount from about 20 parts per billion (ppb) to about 200 parts per
million (ppm) or more. Particularly preferred for treatment by the
process of the invention are those light hydrocarbon gases obtained
by the catalytic cracking of heavier petroleum hydrocarbons such as
gas oils for producing primarily gasoline. These light gases from
the FCC unit have been found to contain small concentrations of
arsenic even though arsine, for example, is known to decompose at
about 450.degree.F. and the temperatures in the FCC unit are known
to reach over 900.degree.F. There is probably insufficient contact
time in an FCC unit to decompose the arsine, or perhaps the arsine
decomposes and reforms on cooling.
Preferably, the charge stock is free of sulfur compounds such as
H.sub.2 S, since sulfur compounds appear to seriously interfere
with the removal of arsines from gaseous hydrocarbon charge stocks.
That is, the process of the invention will operate in the presence
of sulfur compounds, but the loading of the supported lead oxide
before breakthrough will be seriously impaired.
The manner of removing sulfur compounds from the charge stock may
be by any of the methods well known in the art. Such methods
include, for example, the use of liquid solutions of amines or the
use of caustic solutions, e.g., sodium hydroxide solution.
The process of the invention will now be further described by
reference to the attached FIGURE. Referring to the FIGURE, the
petroleum charge for catalytic cracking enters through line 2 into
FCC unit 4 where it is converted under usual catalytic cracking
conditions to a variety of lower boiling products, including
gasoline type products. Gasoline is removed from FCC unit 4 through
line 6. The other gaseous products of the cracking process, which
products are of primary concern here, are removed from FCC unit 4
through line 8 and enter an absorber section 10. Absorber section
10 normally consists of several component units (not shown) such as
an amine absorber, a knock-out drum to remove any entrained liquids
from the gaseous products; and a heater to insure that the gases
remain in the vapor phase. The FCC gases exiting from the heater
unit of absorber section 10 have the typical composition shown in
the following Table I:
TABLE I
Component Vol. % Nitrogen 9.5 Hydrogen 9.8 Methane 29.7 Ethylene
9.7 Ethane 12.6 Propylene 15.5 Propane 6.8 Butenes 0.5 Butanes 1.9
Pentenes 0.4 Pentanes 0.5 Hexanes 0.1 Carbon Monoxide 2.9
The FCC absorber gases are usually at a temperature from 80.degree.
to 150.degree.F., more usually from 100.degree. to 125.degree.F.,
and at a pressure from 250 to 400 psig, more usually at a pressure
from 290 to 360 psig. The increased pressures are those normally
employed in the FCC unit and are used to propel the gases through
the various units in the recovery train. The absorber gases leave
the absorber section 10 through line 12 and pass into arsenic
removal unit 14.
The function of arsenic removal unit 14 is to reduce the
concentration of arsenic in the FCC absorber gases from a
concentration in excess of 20 ppb to a concentration at the outlet
of less than 20 ppb. The concentration of arsenic in the FCC
absorber gases is usually on the order of 50 to 750 ppb but can be
as high as 20 ppm or more. Preferably, the arsenic content of the
gases is lowered to less than 10 ppb and more preferably to less
than 2 ppb by arsenic removal unit 14.
The type of solid material employed in arsenic removal unit 14 is
an important feature of the invention and will be discussed in
detail hereinbelow. Suffice it to say here that the material
comprises an oxide of lead well dispersed upon a suitable support
having a high surface area.
The temperatures to be employed in arsenic removal unit 14 can
suitably be from 50.degree. to 400.degree.F., are usually from
80.degree. to 250.degree.F., and are preferably from 100.degree. to
200.degree.F. Temperatures below 50.degree.F. are undesirable
because of the increased cost and the decreased activity of the
sorbent at those levels. Temperatures above the stated range are
undesirable due to the increased expense of operating the process.
Apart from economic considerations, however, high temperature
levels, which would otherwise promote hydrogenation of olefins
present in the feed stream when certain other sorbent materials are
employed, are not of concern in the process of the present
invention since lead oxide is not a hydrogenation catalyst. Higher
operating temperatures do have the advantage in the process of the
invention of prolonging the life of the lead oxide sorbent before
regeneration is required.
The pressure to be employed in arsenic removal unit 14 is suitably
atmospheric pressure or below, to 1000 psig or more. FCC units
typically operate to produce product gases, as noted above, at
pressures from about 250 to 350 psig. The process of the present
invention operates well at atmospheric pressure, but since it is
expensive to depressure the FCC absorber gases and repressure the
final products for transport through pipelines, it is desirable to
operate the arsenic removal process at increased pressure of, say,
250 to 350 psig. A limitation on the maximum operating pressure is,
however, the effect of pressure on promoting undesirable side
reactions such as the polymerization of any olefins which may be
present in the feedstream. The gaseous volume hourly space velocity
(GVHSV) at standard conditions of temperature and pressure can
suitably be from 1,000 to 36,000 v/v/hr and is usually from 2,000
to 10,000 v/v/hr. The product is removed from the arsenic removal
unit 14 through line 16.
Light hydrocarbon gases such as ethane and propane are fed through
line 18 into pyrolysis furnace 20 for the purpose of cracking the
ethane and propane to produce ethylene. After removal of liquid
products (not shown) from pyrolysis furnace 20, the gaseous
products are passed through line 22 where they are combined with
the products in line 16 from the arsenic removal unit 14.
The combined gases in line 24 enter system 26 which consists of a
number of units, not individually shown, for the purpose of drying
and recovering various hydrocarbon fractions. A C.sub.3 fraction,
for example, can be removed through line 28 and a C.sub.4 fraction
through line 30. The stream of most present interest and of
greatest volume is the C.sub.2 stream containing small amounts of
acetylene, which stream is shown in the FIGURE as being removed
from system 26 through line 32 and which pases into an acetylene
converter 34. The acetylene content is produced in the pyrolysis
furnace 20. Hydrogen enters acetylene converter 35 by means of line
35.
Acetylene converter 34 may contain a catalyst which is sensitive to
poisoning by even minute quantities of arsenic, and thus it is one
of the main objectives of the present invention to protect the
catalyst in the acetylene converter 34 from permanent deactivation
by arsenic. Catalysts which are particularly susceptible to arsenic
poisoning are those containing the noble metals such as platinum
and palladium. Hydrogenation conditions are, of course, employed in
acetylene converter 34, and such conditions are well known to
workers skilled in the art. The C.sub.2 stream, substantially free
of acetylene, is then taken from acetylene converter 34 through
line 36 to a distillation zone 38 where ethylene is removed through
line 40 and heavier products may be suitably removed through line
42. The heavier products may be recycled as feed to pyrolysis
furnace 20 if desired.
It should be noted here that the aresenic removal unit 14 could
have been positioned immediately before the acetylene converter 26,
if desired. Similarly, the same benefits would accrue for any
arsenic-susceptible catalysts used in the hydrogenation of the
propadiene in the C.sub.3 stream from line 28.
PREPARATION OF DISPERSED SORBENT
The sorbent employed in the process of the invention is most easily
converted to a high surface area form by dispersion onto a suitable
high surface area support. The manner of dispersing the sorbent on
the supports is not critical and may be accomplished by means well
known in the art. One method is described in detail in Example 1
below. Briefly, the technique involves the deposition of lead from
a solution, preferably aqueous, of a suitable lead salt such as
lead nitrate followed by calcining in the presence of air to
produce a sorbent comprising lead oxide. The lead salt which is
employed must be one which will decompose to the desired lead oxide
form on calcining or which can be oxidized to the desired lead
oxide form under conditions which will not impair the desired
surface area characteristics of the support.
The amount of lead dispersed on the support is suitably from 5 to
50 weight percent and preferably from 10 to 30 weight percent of
the total sorbent plus support.
Suitable high surface area supports are those well known in the art
as catalyst supports. Examples of suitable supporting materials are
the usual porous naturally occurring or synthetically prepared high
surface area, i.e., over about 50 m.sup.2 /g, refractory metal
oxides well known in the art as catalyst supports, e.g., alumina,
silica, boria, thoria, magnesia or mixtures thereof. Preferably the
supporting material is one of the partially dehydrated forms of
alumina. More preferably, the alumina is one having a surface area
in excess of 50 m.sup.2 /g, preferably a surface area of 150 to 350
m.sup.2 /g. Suitable forms of the higher surface area aluminas and
their methods of preparation are described in the Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Second Edition, Volume 2,
pages 41 et seq. Other suitable supports include clays, zeolites
and crystalline silica aluminas.
EXAMPLE 1
The purpose of this example is to describe one preparation of a
lead oxide material supported by high surface area alumina. An
aqueous solution of lead nitrate was prepared by adding 837.21 g.
of Pb (NO.sub.3).sub.2 (Mallinckrodt Analytical Reagent Grade) to
distilled water to give a final folume of 1670 ml. The weight of
this solution was 2322 g. and its specific gravity was 1.3904 g/cc.
It contained the equivalent of 22.55 percent Pb.
A one-step incipient impregnation of the alumina was carried out by
adding, with stirring, the Pb(NO.sub.3).sub.2 solution to 2055 g.
of 1/16-inch extrudates of a suitable alumina which had previously
been heated to 1,000.degree.F. over a period of 6 hours and held at
1,000.degree.F. for 10 hours. The incipient wetness absorptivity of
the alumina was 0.8127 ml/g of alumina. The wet material was dried
with occasional stirring for 12 hours at 250.degree.F. The dry
material was then calcined by raising the temperature to
1,000.degree.F. over a period of 6 hours and holding at
1,000.degree.F. for 9 hours. The final calcined composition
analyzed 20 weight percent lead calculated as the metal. The
compacted density was 0.804 g/cc and it had a nitrogen B.E.T.
surface area of 160 m.sup.2 /g and a nitrogen pore volume of
0.471.
The final sorbent was off-white in appearance. X-ray analysis of
the sorbent showed the presence of some crystalline lead sulfate,
which is white. There is a small amount of sulfate associated with
the alumina base (1.08 percent sulfur), and this probably accounts
for the presence of the lead sulfate. A similar preparation using a
very low sulfur base (0.08 percent) showed the presence by X-ray
diffraction analysis of the complex 4PbO.sup.. PbSO.sub.4 which is
also white. The lead nitrate from which the sorbent was prepared is
known to decompose at conditions far less severe than the
calcination conditions. Thus, while it is not certain, due to the
complex chemistry of lead oxides, it is believed the lead is
primarily present as PbO or some combination of PbO with lead
sulfate due to the light color of the finished sorbent. Other forms
of lead oxide such as PbO.sub.2, Pb.sub.2 O.sub.3 and Pb.sub.2 O
are highly colored.
Technical grade solutions may be employed in the foregoing
procedure. The solutions are normally added at room temperature but
elevated temperatures may be utilized. The alumina used in this
preparation had a nitrogen B.E.T. surface area of 282 m.sup.2 /g
and a pore volume of 0.63 cc/g.
ARSENIC REMOVAL
Several runs were made under varying conditions to illustrate the
present invention. The results of these runs are presented in
Examples 2-9 summarized in Table II below. The procedures employed
for all tests were identical and were as follows: Gaseous charge
stocks were prepared by mixing a sufficient amount of a blend of
2,000 ppm AsH.sub.3 in nitrogen (supplied by Matheson Gas Co.) with
one of the following diluent gases to obtain a charge stock having
the designated ppm of AsH.sub.3 as shown in Table II below.
Diluent Gas No. 1. An ethylene stream having the following
approximate analysis:
Component Vol. % Ethylene 65.0 Ethane 35.0 Acetylene 0.5
Diluent Gas No. 2. A pure hydrocarbon blend having the following
approximate analysis:
Component Vol. % Propylene 15 Ethane 12 Ethylene 10 Methane 30
Hydrogen 15 Nitrogen 18 Total 100
Diluent Gas No. 3. A commercial FCC absorber gas of the following
analysis:
Typical Component Vol. % Range Vol. % Carbon Monoxide 1.6 0.2-3.4
Hydrogen 7.9 9-12 Nitrogen 9.8 6-10 Methane 30.0 27-33 Ethylene 9.8
9-11 Ethane 12.4 10-13.0 Propylene 17.2 15-18.0 Propane 7.6 7-15
Butenes 0.4 0-1.0 Isobutane 1.3 1-2.0 n-Butane 0.1 0-1.0 C.sub.5
1.7 0-3 C.sub.6 0.2 0-1 Total 100.0 Arsenic 450 ppb 50-750 ppb
Hydrogen Sulfide 1 ppm(wt) 0-2 ppm Carbonyl Sulfide 3.4 ppm(wt) 0-5
ppm
Diluent gases Nos. 2 and 3 were passed through a water bubbler to
saturate them with water vapor at ambient temperature prior to
adding arsine. Diluent gas No. 1 was not saturated with water.
The reactor containing the supported sorbent consisted of a 3/8
inch I.D. stainless steel cylinder, with a 1/8 inch O.D. thermowell
extending along its axis. The reactor was suitably heated. The
temperature at the center of the supported sorbent material was
measured by means of an iron-constantan thermocouple inserted into
the thermowell. The test gas was introduced at the bottom of the
reactor, passing through an approximately 6-inch-long bed of quartz
chips which served to preheat the gas stream.
The sorbent was dispersed on activated alumina in accordance with
the procedures set forth in Example I. The bed of supported sorbent
within the reactor was approximately 4 to 8 inches in length and
consisted of 5-10 cc. of material sized to 20-40 mesh. In all
cases, the weight percent of lead compared with the total weight of
support material and sorbent was 20 percent.
The arsine not removed by passage through the bed of supported
sorbent was scrubbed from the effluent gas stream by a pyridine
solution containing 0.50 g. silver diethyldithiocarbamate (Fisher
Certified Reagent) per 100 ml. pyridine. This silver salt combines
with the arsine to form a highly colored complex, permitting
colorimetric monitoring of the total arsine breakthrough
accumulation. Small samples were periodically drawn from the arsine
scrubber and the optical transmittance at 540 mm. wavelength was
measured with a Bausch and Lomb Spectronic 70 spectrophotometer.
This optical transmittance was then plotted as a function of time.
The numerical derivative of this curve was calculated to determine
the rate of arsine breakthrough. The percent breakthrough figures
given in Table II below represent the percentage of the arsenic not
removed in relation to the arsenic content of the charge stock.
##SPC1##
Referring to Table II, the run for Example 5 demonstrates the
telling effect of having H.sub.2 S in the charge stock. The runs
for Examples 7-9 show that regeneration at higher temperatures
increased the loadings of arsenic achieved.
Another series of runs was made wherein a slipstream of a
commercial FCC absorber gas without the addition of added amounts
of AsH.sub.3 was passed through a 1" in diameter by 4-foot-long bed
of a lead oxide sorbent prepared as described in Example 1. The
commercial FCC absorber gas had a composition within the range as
shown above for Diluent Gas No. 3. Again, there were no added
amounts of AsH.sub.3. The results are presented in the Example
given below.
EXAMPLE 10
In the run for this Example, the bed was operated at 80.degree. to
105.degree.F. and a pressure of 260--280 psig and a GVHSV of 9,000
for 8 days at which time a small breakthrough of arsenic was noted
and the GVHSV was reduced to 4,500. The run was continued for a
total of 2,300 hours when, again, a small breakthrough of arsenic
was noted. Within 48 more hours, the breakthrough was 10 percent,
and this increased to 20 percent after a total of 3,000 hours. It
was calculated that about 1.7 weight percent arsenic was present on
the sorbent at initial breakthrough (2,300 hours) and about 2.2
weight percent arsenic after 3,000 hours.
Yet another series of runs was made wherein a slipstream of a
commercial ethylene concentrate (having the approximate analysis of
Diluent Gas No. 1 above) and containing about 40--400 ppb of
AsH.sub.3 was passed through a 1" in diameter by 4-foot-long bed of
a lead oxide sorbent prepared as described in Example 1. The
results are given in Example 11 below.
EXAMPLE 11
In the run for this Example the bed was operated at 120.degree. to
150.degree.F. and a pressure of 230-300 psig and a GVHSV of 9,000
for a total time of 3,230 hours without breakthrough, at which
point the run was discontinued. Estimated calculation indicated the
loading of arsenic to be 0.65 weight percent.
In each of Examples 10 and 11, a fresh batch of sorbent was
employed.
Resort may be had to such variations and modifications as fall
within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the appended
claims.
* * * * *