U.S. patent number 3,781,736 [Application Number 05/301,094] was granted by the patent office on 1973-12-25 for shield for permanent magnet structure.
This patent grant is currently assigned to General Electric Company. Invention is credited to Rollin J. Parker.
United States Patent |
3,781,736 |
Parker |
December 25, 1973 |
SHIELD FOR PERMANENT MAGNET STRUCTURE
Abstract
A shield or guide to reduce leakage flux in the vicinity of the
air gap of a permanent magnet is provided by positioning magnetic
sleeves or plates in engagement with surfaces of the permanent
magnet adjacent the air gap. The sleeves or plates are polarized at
their surfaces which engage the permanent magnet. Each sleeve or
plate has its surface which abuts the permanent magnet of the same
polarity as the portion of the permanent magnet which it engages.
The sleeves or plates may be flexible. Ferrites and cobalt-rare
earths are satisfactory magnetic materials for the sleeves and
plates.
Inventors: |
Parker; Rollin J. (Greenville,
MI) |
Assignee: |
General Electric Company
(N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
23161919 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/301,094 |
Filed: |
October 26, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
335/304;
335/306 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01F
7/0205 (20130101); F25B 2321/0023 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01F
7/02 (20060101); H01f 007/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;335/301,304,306 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Harris; George
Claims
What I claim as new and desire to secure by letters patent of the
United States is:
1. A magnetically shielded permanent magnet structure
comprising:
a permanent magnet having an air gap;
and at least one flux guide of permanent magnet material outlying
said magnet adjacent said air gap, said guide having magnetic poles
oriented to provide counter magnetic potential directionally
displaced 90.degree. to the flux of said magnet whereby leakage
flux at said air gap is reduced.
2. A structure as claimed in claim 1 wherein the shielding sleeve
is flexible.
3. A structure as claimed in claim 1 wherein the shielding sleeve
is composed of a cobalt-rare earth alloy.
4. A structure as claimed in claim 2 wherein the shielding sleeve
is composed of a ferrite magnet material.
5. A magnetically shielded permanent magnet structure
comprising:
an elongated permanent magnet having an air gap;
and a magnetic shield for reducing leakage flux at said air gap,
said shield comprising flat magnets positioned around, and in
contact with, said elongated magnet structure adjacent said air
gap, said flat magnets being magnetized in a direction whereby the
interior surface of each flat magnet possesses the same polarity as
the portion of the elongated magnet which it engages.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Magnetic flux from a permanent magnet is subject to straying or
leaking. This is particularly the case where it is necessary for
such flux to pass through a long air gap. There is no known
material which can insulate magnetic flux in the sense that
insulating materials can insulate an electrical conductor. Leakage
flux is useless flux as far as uses of permanent magnets are
concerned. Consequently, permanent magnets must be designed much
larger than would be necessary if leakage flux could be eliminated
or greatly reduced. It is an aim of this invention to provide a
structure which includes a barrier to leakage flux.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a shield or guide to reduce leakage
flux in the vicinity of the air gap of a permanent magnet. The
permanent magnet is provided with sleeves or plates in engagement
with its surfaces adjacent to the air gap. The engaging surface of
the sleeve or plate possess the same polarity as the surface of the
permanent magnet with which it is in contact. This establishes a
barrier to leakage flux which would otherwise emanate from the
magnet. The sleeves or plates may be formed of flexible material
and may be in the form of ferrites or cobalt-rare earth materials.
Preferably, the shield provided by the sleeves or plates should
have a high coercive force and should have just sufficient magnetic
potential to neutralize the magnetic potential producing the
leakage flux.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In FIG. 1 a hollow cylindrical alnico magnet has its north pole
indicated by the letter "N" and its south pole indicated by the
letter "S". Adjacent to the north pole is a sleeve 11 of magnetic
material. Adjacent to the south pole is a sleeve 12 of magnetic
material. The sleeves 11 and 12 are magnetically oriented to
provide an exterior surface of one polarity and an interior surface
of the opposite polarity. The polarity of the interior surface of
the sleeve magnets 11 and 12 is the same as the polarity of the
magnet 10 with which it is in contact. This has the effect of
repelling what would otherwise be leakage flux emanating from the
magnet 10. Thus, the sleeves 11 and 12 serve as barriers to leakage
flux from magnet 10. The result is that the normal distribution of
flux from the alnico sleeve is modified and a larger percentage of
flux is returned through the inside of the alnico sleeve. This
arrangement is typical of the arrangement used to focus an election
tube. In an actual test case the weight of an alnico 8 sleeve to
produce 1000 gauss in the center of sleeve (point H.sub.i) is 10
pounds with the conventional approach using no magnetic shielding.
A design to incorporate shielding has an alnico 8 weight of 4
pounds and gives 700 gauss before application of shielding. As a
flexible ferrite shield is applied the flux density increases to
1000 gauss. Three pounds of magnetic shielding is required.
Consequently, there is an overall weight saving of three pounds or
30 percent and an economic advantage in that the cost of the
flexible ferrite is less than one-third that of alnico.
The correct choice of thickness of magnetic sleeves 11 and 12
enables the flux density at the outer surface of the magnet 10 to
be held at approximately zero. In this condition the magnetomotive
force of the sleeves 11 and 12 exactly balances the magnetomotive
force of the surface flux leakage of the magnet 10. This flux
cancellation system will work for any permanent magnet system but
confers maximum advantage in permanent magnet circuits having long
limbs supplying flux to very high permeance air gaps.
FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate the invention applied to a magnetic
structure having a rectangular configuration. In this embodiment a
pair of alnico magnets 13 and 14 have the polarity indicated by the
letters "N" and "S", respectively. A steel member 15 provides a
magnetic flux path. Immediately adjacent the north pole of the
magnet 13 a plurality of magnetic plates 16, 17 and 18 engage the
surface of the magnet 13. Similarly, a plurality of magnetic plates
21, 22 and 23 are in contact with the surface of the magnet 14
immediately adjacent the air gap between the magnets 13 and 14.
Each surface of the plate magnets 16-18 and 21-23 has the same
polarity as the surface of the alnico magnet 13 and 14 with which
it is in contact as indicated by the letters "N" and "S". Thus, the
plate magnets 16-18 and 21-23 serve as guides and barriers for the
magnetic flux emanating from the magnets 13 and 14.
The plates 16-18 and 21-23 are preferably composed of cobalt-rare
earth magnetic materials prepared in accordance with U.S. Pat. Nos.
3,625,779, 3,639,181, and 3,652,343 which are incorporated herein
by reference. The use of cobalt-rare earth magnetic plates as flux
leakage barriers adds very little to the weight of the permanent
magnet and greatly increases the effective flux output. Thus, a
smaller and lighter magnet can produce the same effective flux
output as a larger magnet which does not have the type of flux
leakage barrier disclosed herein. In a high permeance gap, tests
indicate that the useful gap density can be increased by 35 percent
by using such a shielding approach.
While the invention has been described with reference to particular
embodiments, it is obvious that there may be variations which
properly fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the
invention should be limited in scope only as may be necessitated by
the scope of the appended claims.
* * * * *