U.S. patent number 3,779,312 [Application Number 05/232,571] was granted by the patent office on 1973-12-18 for internally ridged heat transfer tube.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Universal Oil Products Company. Invention is credited to Edward P. Habdas, Mitchael W. Jurmo, James G. Withers, Jr..
United States Patent |
3,779,312 |
Withers, Jr. , et
al. |
December 18, 1973 |
INTERNALLY RIDGED HEAT TRANSFER TUBE
Abstract
Metal heat transfer tube has a single start helical ridge on its
inner surface which conforms to a range of values of a disclosed
equation relating the height of the ridge to its pitch and to the
inner diameter of the tube. A method of designing a tube for
maximum performance is also disclosed. The improved tube provides
especially good results in systems, such as steam condensation
systems, wherein a single phase fluid is carried by the tube.
Inventors: |
Withers, Jr.; James G.
(Dearborn, MI), Habdas; Edward P. (Dearborn Heights, MI),
Jurmo; Mitchael W. (Dearborn, MI) |
Assignee: |
Universal Oil Products Company
(Des Plaines, IL)
|
Family
ID: |
22873680 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/232,571 |
Filed: |
March 7, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
165/184; 138/122;
165/179; 138/38; 165/177 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F28F
1/42 (20130101); F28F 1/426 (20130101); B21D
15/06 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F28F
1/42 (20060101); F28F 1/10 (20060101); B21D
15/06 (20060101); B21D 15/00 (20060101); F28f
001/14 () |
Field of
Search: |
;165/179,184
;138/122 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Sukalo; Charles
Claims
We claim as our invention:
1. A metal heat transfer tube having single start internal helical
ridging such that the inner boundary of the tube wall, when viewed
in longitudinal sectional profile, is comprised of alternating
convex and concave portions which join at common tangents, and
wherein the internal tube surface can be described by the equation:
.phi. = e.sup.2 /pd.sub.i where .phi. is a dimensionless severity
parameter, e is the height of the helical ridge, p is the helical
pitch and d.sub.i is the inside diameter, and where .phi. is
greater than 0.1 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.2 and equal to or less than
about 0.365 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.2.
2. The metal heat transfer tube of claim 1 wherein .phi. is equal
to about 0.365 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.2.
3. The metal heat transfer tube of claim 1 wherein the helical
ridge has a convex ridge cap, the axial thickness t of said cap
being equal to or greater than 0.085 inches.
4. The metal heat transfer tube of claim 2 wherein the helical
ridge has a convex ridge cap, the axial thickness t of said cap
being equal to or greater than 0.085 inches.
5. The metal heat transfer tube of claim 1 wherein said tube is
corrugated and has a uniform wall thickness.
6. The metal heat transfer tube of claim 2 wherein said tube is
corrugated and has a uniform wall thickness.
7. The metal heat transfer tube of claim 3 wherein said tube is
corrugated and has a uniform wall thickness.
8. The metal heat transfer tube of claim 4 wherein said tube is
corrugated and has a uniform wall thickness.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to metal tubing for heat transfer purposes
and particularly to such tubing wherein a special configuration is
given to the inner surface to improve its performance.
As explained at some length in British Pat. No. 1,230,196, U.S.
Pat. No. 3,612,175, and especially in U.S. Pat. No. 3,217,799,
substantial improvements in heat transfer over plain tubing can be
achieved by providing special configurations on the inner and/or
outer surfaces of tubes. Where the tubing is to be used in a steam
condensation apparatus where a single phase fluid such as water is
on the inside of the tube, it has been found that the major
modification which can be made to a plain tube to increase its
overall heat transfer efficiency is one wherein the interior
surface is modified. The objective of the surface modification is
to increase heat transfer by corrugating the inner surface to
promote fluid turbulence without, at the same time, providing such
an increase in the resistance of flow through the tube as to
nullify the overall efficiency thereof.
In order to enable comparisons of the tubeside heat transfer
performance of different tubes having different internal
configurations, the following specialized form of the Sieder-Tate
equation may be used:
h.sub.i Di/k =Ci (D.sub.i G/.mu.).sup.0.8 (C.sub.p .mu./k ).sup.1/3
(.mu./.mu..omega.).sup. 0.14
Where
h.sub.i = inside coefficient of heat transfer, Btu/hr-sq
ft-.degree. F
d.sub.i = tube inside diameter, ft
k = water thermal conductivity at bulk water temperature, Btu/hr-sq
ft-.degree. F/ft
C.sub.i = inside heat transfer coefficient constant,
dimensionless
G = mass flow rate, lb/hr-sq ft
C.sub.p = specific heat, Btu/lb-.degree.F
.mu. = water viscosity at average bulk water temperature,
lb/ft-hr
.mu..omega.= water viscosity at average wall temperature,
lb/ft-hr
The dimensionless inside heat transfer coefficient constant C.sub.i
for the particular tube can be determined by means of a modified
Wilson plot technique as described at pages 19-30 of Industrial
Engineering Chemistry Process Design & Development, Vol. 10,
No. 1, 1971, in an article entitled "Steam Condensing On Vertical
Rows Of Horizontal Corrugated And Plain Tubes" by J.G. Withers and
E.H. Young. Although it is generally desirable to design a tube so
that C.sub.i is a maximum, there are many instances where one might
desire that C.sub.i be of a lower but predetermined value. This
latter situation could prevail in the case where allowable pressure
drop is severely restricted. Another desirable design feature is to
have the corrugated section of the tube have a diameter equal to
the diameter of the tube ends since a tube will exhibit less
friction loss and pressure drop if its corrugated portion has a
diameter as large as the tube ends rather than a smaller one.
In view of the many variables that affect the heat transfer and
pressure drop properties of a tube it would be highly desirable to
be able to predict the performance of a particular tube
configuration and to be able to predict the configuration which
will provide the maximum performance.
SUMMARY
It is an object of this invention to provide a single helix metal
heat transfer tube having an internal configuration which will
provide maximum heat transfer performance.
It is another object of this invention to provide a means for
enabling one to predict the heat transfer performance of the inside
surface of a tube.
These and other objects are attained by the metal heat transfer
tube of the present invention which includes a single start helical
ridge on its inner surface. The function of the ridge is to perturb
the liquid flowing in the tube so that the liquid can not build up
boundary layers along the tube wall which would inhibit the
transfer of heat from the fluid to the tube wall. Although the
prior art has intimated some of the significant geometrical
considerations which affect heat transfer performance, it has
failed to relate the geometrical characteristics in a way that the
response of the heat transfer coefficient C.sub.i to variations in
geometrical considerations will be predictable. Rodgers U.S. Pat.
No. 3,217,799 singles out the ratio of the axial spacing dimension
between adjacent ridges to the ridge height dimension as the
significant parameter. Although this relationship is an important
consideration, it is not sufficiently specific to narrow down the
most favorable tube design in such a manner that tube performance
could be predicted or maximized.
After thoroughly studying data from many tubes we have found that
there is a geometrical parameter that correlates well with C.sub.i.
This parameter is a dimensionless severity parameter, .phi., which
involves ridge height (e), pitch (p) and inside diameter (d.sub.i),
in such a way that:
.phi.= e.sup.2 /p d.sub.i
Data from many different single start helical ridged tubes have
established a rather remarkable correlation between C.sub.i and
.phi. and a plotting of the data indicates that there is a maximum
possible C.sub.i and that this maximum value occurs at a specific
value of .phi. rather than over a range of values of .phi.. Since
the maximum value of C.sub.i has been found to occur when .phi. =
0.365 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.2, it is possible to tailor the tube
configuration so that it can provide any desired value of C.sub.i
up to the maximum and down to that for plain tube. Although the
C.sub.i vs .phi. correlation has been found to hold true for the
vast majority of tubes studied, it has been noted that in a few of
the tubes the ridge cap dimensions of the helical ridge have been
found to be critical in that the measured value of C.sub.i for
these few tubes did not correspond to the value predicted by the
C.sub.i vs .phi. correlation curve. Fortunately, this situation can
be resolved by means of a reinforcing criterion involving a
parameter .chi., which is defined as:
.chi.= ety/d.sub.i where t and y are the width and height of the
ridge cap, e is the ridge height and d.sub.i is the inside diameter
of the tube. A plot of C.sub.i vs .chi. has been made which
indicates that the maximum value of C.sub.i corresponds to the
extreme maximum value of .chi.. Although the .chi. correlation is
not as uniform as the .phi. correlation, it does seem to predict
C.sub.i within 10 percent of its measured value. If both the .chi.
and .phi. correlation curves are used whenever the .phi. of a
particular single start helically ridged tube exceeds 0.25 .times.
10.sup.-.sup.2 and the lower value of C.sub.i predicted by the two
correlation curves is selected, one can predict with a high degree
of accuracy the intube heat transfer performance for turbulent flow
of single phase fluid inside the particular tube. For values of
.phi. below 0.25 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.2 there is no need to use the
C.sub.i vs .chi. correlator. An alternative procedure to avoid the
necessity of using the C.sub.i vs .chi. correlation for values of
.phi. above 0.25 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.2 would be to simply avoid
values of t below 0.085 inches since the defect in the C.sub.i vs
.chi. correlation was found to occur only at low values of ridge
cap thickness.
An upper limit of 0.365 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.2 for the severity
factor .phi. is very desirable since beyond this value the value of
C.sub.i drops off while the friction factor, a direct indicator of
pressure drop, increases. Values of .phi. greater than 0.365
.times. 10.sup.-.sup.2 should only be considered for single-phase
turbulent intube flow when the controlling thermal resistance is
associated with the external surface, and a severely contoured
external surface is justified by its improvement contribution, and
the internal configuration is incidental to that of the external
surface of the tube. Although the correlation of C.sub.i vs .phi.
seems to hold true down to a value of .phi.=0 where the tube inner
surface would be plain, an arbitrary lower limit of .phi.=0.1
.times. 10.sup.-.sup.2 has been set since the improvement in the
value of C.sub.i over that of a plain tube for lower values of
.phi. is relatively minor.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a partially sectioned side plan view of a plain ended
corrugated tube;
FIG. 2 is an enlarged sectional view of a portion of the corrugated
tube section in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a fragmentary sectional view similar to FIG. 2 but
showing a modified corrugation shape;
FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the heat transfer performance of a
plurality of single-helix internal-ridged tubes which plots the
Sieder-Tate-Equation Constant, C.sub.i as a function of the
Severity Parameter .phi.;
FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating the heat transfer performance of a
plurality of single-helix internal-ridged tubes which plots the
Sieder-Tate-Equation Constant, C.sub.i, in relation to a function,
.chi., which includes the ridge cap dimensions of the tube;
FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the heat transfer performance of
single-helix, internal-ridged tubes, expressed as an improvement
ratio over a plain tube;
FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the Pressure Drop characteristics of
single-helix internal-ridged tubes taken at an arbitrary reference
Reynolds Number equal to 35,000 as a function of Severity
Parameter, .phi.;
FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the effect of helix pitch on outside
tube diameter when internal single-start helical ridges are formed
by an external corrugating operation; and
FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating a correlation of helix pitch
reguired for a uniform diameter corrugated tube with the product of
the outside diameter and the wall thickness.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1 shows a corrugated tube indicated generally at 10 having a
plain end 12 and a corrugated section 14. The outer diameter AB of
the plain end 12 is preferably equal to or very slightly greater
than the outer diameter CD of the corrugated section 14 while the
plain end wall thickness BE is equal to the corrugated section wall
thickness CF. The distance GH between identical points on adjacent
internal ridges produced by the corrugations is defined as the
pitch p.
In the enlargement of the corrugated section 14 shown in FIG. 2,
one can see that the internal corrugations comprise ridge portions
indicated generally at 20 and connecting portions indicated
generally at 22. The ridge portion 20 is generally convex toward
the inside of the tube while the connecting portion 22 is generally
concave. The portions 20 and 22 join each other smoothly at points
of inflection 26 where the ridge arc 20' and the connecting arc 22'
have a common tangent. The convex curved portion 27 of the ridge 20
between the points 26 is termed the ridge cap. The ridge cap has a
width between points 26, 26 defined as t and a height y between its
crest 28 and points 26. The ridge height e is the radial distance
between ridge crest 28 and the outermost point 30 on the inner
surface of connecting portion 22. The internal diameter d.sub.i is
the diametral distance between points 30 on opposite sides of the
tube. The pitch, p, is the distance between any pair of identical
points on adjacent ridges 20, such as the points 28.
FIG. 3 illustrates a modification of the tube shown in FIGS. 1 and
2 in that connecting portions 122 are altered in shape as compared
to the concave connecting portions 22 of FIG. 2. The connecting
portion 122 is flat over a portion 34 of its length. The outer
surface of the tube is broken away in FIG. to illustrate the fact
that the tube could have a number of different outer surface
configurations other than the shape shown in FIG. 2. Since our
invention is concerned with improving the tube side heat transfer
properties, there is no need to discuss particular external shapes
since these will depend on the external heat transfer
conditions.
FIG. 4 is a plot of the data derived from testing a plain tube and
many single-helix internally ridged tubes using the modified Wilson
plot technique previously referenced to determine the value of the
Sieder-Tate Equation constant C.sub.i. The abcissa of the plot is
the severity parameter .phi. which is equal to e.sup.2 /p d.sub.i
where e is the height of the corrugations (FIG. 2), p is the pitch
and d.sub.i is the internal diameter. The parameter .phi. is
defined as a severity parameter since it is strongly dependent on
the ridge height or severity of the corrugations. From the curve 36
it can be seen that C.sub.i reaches a peak value when .phi. = 0.365
.times. 10.sup.-.sup.2 and then drops off as .phi. increases. The
right hand portion of the curve 36 represents several prior art
tubes. Point 38 represents the 1 in. tube and point 40 represents
the 5/8 in. tube discussed in the aforementioned Withers and Young
article.
The single-helix ridged tubes tested represent variations in ridge
height depth e from 0.014-0.046 in., pitch p from 0.240-0.625 and
internal diameter d.sub.i from 0.530-1.288 in. These values are not
meant to be limiting, however, since it is felt that e could be at
least as large as 0.09 in., the pitch p at least as great as 1.2
in. and the internal diameter d.sub.i any value up to about 3
inches.
Although the severity parameter .phi. shows an excellent
correlation between tube geometry and the Sieder-Tate Constant
C.sub.i which makes it most easy to design a tube by choosing e, p
and d.sub.i to provide the necessary value of .phi. for the value
of C.sub.i desired, the correlation (curve 36) was shown not to
hold for a few tubes as evidenced by points 38, 44 and 46 in FIG.
4. These non-conforming tubes proved to provide lower values of
C.sub.i for their particular values of .phi. than would be
predicted by the curve 36 of FIG. 4. Fortunately, it was found that
the tubes which failed to fall on the curve had rather critical
ridge cap dimensions. By avoiding tubes with a ridge cap width t of
less than 0.85 in., the designer can insure that the correlation
curve 36 plotted in FIG. 4 will hold. Alternately, another
parameter which is, in part, a function of the ridge cap dimensions
can be used to predict the value of C.sub.i. This parameter is
termed .chi. and is equal to e t y/d.sub.i where e is the ridge
height, t is the width of the ridge cap and d.sub.i is the internal
diameter. As can be seen in FIG. 5, there is a fairly good
correlation between C.sub.i and .chi. in that C.sub.i increases as
.chi. increases. The C.sub.i vs .chi. curve 48 of FIG. 5 need not
be considered for tubes having values of .phi. which are less than
0.25 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.2. When .phi. is greater than 0.25
.times. 10.sup.-.sup.2, both the .phi. correlation curve 36 of FIG.
4 and the .chi. correlation curve 48 of FIG. 5 should be considered
with the lower value of C.sub.i being considered to be the more
accurate.
FIG. 6 is a plot similar to FIG. 4 except that it relates, by curve
50, the improvement ratio over plain tube [C.sub.i /(C.sub.i)p] to
the .phi. parameter. This alternative method of displaying the
C.sub.i vs .phi. correlation is useful in comparing results from
different laboratories since the base value, (C.sub.i)p, for plain
tube may vary somewhat among different test setups.
FIG. 7 illustrates a correlation of pressure drop characteristics
of single-helix, internal-ridge tubes as a function of the severity
parameter .phi. where the pressure drop is expressed as Friction
Factor, f, at a reference Reynolds number of 35,000. It is commonly
understood that the friction factor, f, is a direct index of
pressure drop per unit length of tube, as long as one compares
tubes of a given diameter at the same Reynolds number. Since it is
evident from the curve 56 of FIG. 7 that pressure drop increases
significantly with increases in the severity parameter .phi., it is
desirable that tubes be configured so that .phi. not be permitted
to increase beyond the optimum value of 0.365 .times.
10.sup.-.sup.2. Such an increase in .phi. would not only result in
a lower value of C.sub.i, but would also cause a presumably
undesirable increase in pressure drop. In certain instances, design
limitations on length, pressure drop, diameter, etc. could render
appropriate the selection of .phi. below 0.365 .times.
10.sup.-.sup.2 even though entailing a lower value of C.sub.i.
FIG. 8 illustrates the effect of the helix pitch, p, on the outside
diameter of a corrugated tube when internal single-start helical
ridges are formed by an external corrugating operation of the type
shown in Anderson U.S. Pat. No. 3,128,821. The curve 58 shows that
by varying the pitch, p, the outside diameter CD (FIG. 2) of the
corrugated section 14 can be varied so as to either decrease or
increase relative to the outside diameter AB of the uncorrugated
section 12 of the tube 10. The curve 58 is obtained for any
particular alloy, diameter and wall thickness by arbitrarily
selecting a given corrugation depth, corrugating the tube at
various helix angles, and measuring the resulting outer diameter
and corresponding pitch for each of the helix angles. By connecting
the test points with a curve as shown in FIG. 8, the pitch required
to provide a uniform diameter can be readily determined.
FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating the helical pitch required to obtain
a uniform diameter corrugated tube for any particular product of
the tube outside diameter times its wall thickness. The particular
correlation curve 60 shown was determined from data derived from a
given tube material (90-10 cupronickel) and given groove depth
(0.032 in.) where the tube was corrugated in a single helix style
by apparatus such as shown in Anderson U.S. Pat. No. 3,128,821. A
family of such curves could be determined for other tube materials
and groove depths. The correlation is possible since experiments
have shown that there exists a certain helix pitch, (p).sub.u.d.,
which will yield a uniform diameter product in the sense that the
maximum projected outer diameter of the corrugated section is
essentially equal to the outside diameter of the plain starting
tube.
In order to apply the teachings of the invention to the design of a
single start, internally grooved tube where it is desired to
achieve maximum heat transfer between a single phase liquid in the
tube and the tube surface, the following procedures should be
followed:
1. Select a material, outside diameter, and wall thickness which
will provide the necessary corrosion resistance, strength and cost,
for example, for the intended use.
2. Assuming that a uniform diameter product is desired, multiply
the outside diameter times the wall thickness and read the
corresponding pitch from a curve such as curve 60 in FIG. 9. If the
curve 60 has not been determined for the particular material and
corrugation depth, the proper helix pitch for various groove depths
may be determined by trial and error by selecting various helix
angles and groove depths until the diameter remains constant. This
should be done until several combinations are known which will
provide a constant outside diameter.
3. Using the equation, .phi. = e.sup.2 /Pd.sub.i = 0.365 .times.
10.sup.-.sup.2, various values of p should be tried until a
resulting value of e is found which is identical to the groove
depth which must be used with the particular value of p to achieve
a constant diameter.
If it is desired to design a tube so that C.sub.i is a particular
value less than its maximum, the value of .phi. corresponding to
the desired value of C.sub.i can be found on curve 36 in FIG. 4.
The values of p, and e which should be used can then be determined
as set forth in the preceding example. When designing for either a
maximum or a particular C.sub.i, the designer should also check
curve 48 in FIG. 5 when .phi. is between 0.25-0.365 .times.
10.sup.-.sup.2 and t is less than 0.085 in. to be certain that a
C.sub.i as high as predicted by curve 36 will be obtained.
The teachings of the present invention relative to designing tubes
for maximum internal heat transfer are applicable to any of the
common tube materials such as cuprous alloys, titanium, stainless
steel, carbon steel and aluminum and are independent of outside
diameter and the outer configuration of the tube.
Of all the tubes used to establish the various correlations
previously set forth herein, one seemed to exactly correspond to
the predicted criteria for a single-helix, internally grooved tube
which would have a maximum value of C.sub.i. This tube was made of
90-10 Cupronickel and had the following dimensions: Outer Diameter
(plain end) = 1.250 inches; Outer Diameter (corrugated end) = 1.249
inches; Wall = 0.050 inch; d.sub.i = 1.149 inch; e = 0.046 inch; p
= 0.505 inch; t = 0.120 inch; y = 0.010 inch; .phi. = 0.365 .times.
10.sup.-.sup.2 ; X = 0.48 .times. 10.sup.-.sup.4 in..sup.2 ;
C.sub.i = 0.0693; C.sub.i /(C.sub.i).sub.p = 2.62.
* * * * *