U.S. patent number 3,778,845 [Application Number 05/314,223] was granted by the patent office on 1973-12-18 for waistband with frictional means.
This patent grant is currently assigned to QST Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Samuel E. Miller.
United States Patent |
3,778,845 |
Miller |
December 18, 1973 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
WAISTBAND WITH FRICTIONAL MEANS
Abstract
Textile fabric provided with an outstanding continuous ridge
comprising lays of rubber thread which are superimposed on one
another, the respective lays each being disposed as a sine wave of
the same frequency to assume a mutually intersecting relation and
the lays being anchored to the fabric by stitches of conventional,
relatively non-elastic yarn.
Inventors: |
Miller; Samuel E. (Winnetka,
IL) |
Assignee: |
QST Industries, Inc. (Chicago,
IL)
|
Family
ID: |
23219093 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/314,223 |
Filed: |
December 11, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
2/236 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A41F
9/00 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
A41F
9/00 (20060101); A41f 009/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;2/236,237,224,238
;112/262,132,133,134,135 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Hunter; H. Hampton
Claims
I claim:
1. A waistband for incorporation with an article of apparel to
provide implemented frictional engagement of the article with
another article of apparel worn in overlapping relation therewith
comprising a flat-lying base fabric having an outstanding ridge
comprising unstressed lays of rubber thread, each lay being
arranged in a sinusoidal configuration, the frequency of the
sinusoid of each lay being the same and the amplitude of each lay
being constant, the several lays being disposed in superimposed,
mutually-intersecting relation, said ridge being disposed entirely
on that face of the base fabric to be positioned adjacent said
other article of apparel, and a non-elastic thread formed into
bights passing through the base fabric and around the lays to
anchor the same to the base fabric.
2. The combination in accordance with claim 1 wherein the bights
are constituted by lock stitching.
3. The combination in accordance with claim 1 wherein the bights of
the anchoring thread pass over the lays at their points of
intersection.
4. The combination in accordance with claim 1 wherein the rubber
thread is of polygonal cross section.
5. The combination in accordance with claim 1 wherein said rubber
thread is of quadrilateral cross section.
6. The combination in accordance with claim 1 in which the rubber
thread is synthetic.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to improvements in the waistband having
frictional means disclosed in my U. S. Pat. No. 3,052,890.
The frictional ridge disclosed in said patent utilized a rubber
thread which was formed into convoluted loops as one thread of a
double-lock stitch, with the tension so controlled as to confine
the rubber to one face of the base fabric. When using that
construction, the production rate left much to be desired,
principally for the reason that passage of the rubber through the
looper involved problems of feeding tension and friction.
The present invention avoids these problems since the rubber
threads comprising the ridge are laid on the base fabric by means
of feeding fingers which have considerably less friction and cause
no perceptible misbehavior of the thread due to tension
effects.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to improvements in waistbands for articles
of wearing apparel as, for example, trousers and skirts. In
particular, it has reference to a frictional element on the inside
of the waistband having as its main purpose the retention of the
tail portion of a skirt, blouse, or the like where the same is
tucked into the nether, overlapping garment. In turn, the
frictional mutual engagement results in a degree of support for the
trousers or skirt.
The principal object of the invention is to provide, on the
interior surface of a waistband of the general character mentioned,
one or more, preferably continuous ridges of thread which is
comparatively resilient, each ridge comprising lays of rubber, each
formed into sinusoidal configuration and the lays being disposed
one on top of the other. The ridge or ridges are disposed entirely
on the interior face of the waistband to present to the shirt or
blouse, a somewhat narrow or restricted area of contact of highly
frictional character.
Another object is to provide frictional means in accordance with
the foregoing which may be incorporated with the waistband during
conventional, production type sewing in an economical and reliable
manner.
A further object is to provide frictional means of the character
aforesaid which, although disposed on only one face of the fabric
of the waistband, is non-ravelling, so that if, during wear,
cleaning, or laundering, a portion of the rubber threads is injured
or broken, the remainder thereof will continue unaffected in
function.
An additional object resides in providing frictional means as
aforesaid which utilizes so-called cut rubber, either natural or
synthetic, which will present, as active portions thereof, a
plurality of comparatively sharp corners, thereby to enhance the
gripping action thereof.
The invention does not comprehend an elastic waistband per se, that
is, one which is longitudinally extensible. However, the principles
of the invention may also be incorporated with a waistband of that
general class. Neither does the invention comprehend the
incorporation of the frictional elements of the invention by
weaving in a manner such that the rubber is included as warp
threads woven into a conventional textile fabric whereby bights of
rubber are caused to protrude from the base fabric. Nor does the
invention comprehend the inclusion of the frictional means as
stitches or loops of rubber penetrating a base fabric.
Broadly regarded, the invention comprehends the combination, with a
strip of material forming the waistband, or a component thereof, of
a superficial ridge, or a plurality of ridges, of a thread of
comparatively resilient, frictional material such as natural rubber
(latex) or synthetic rubber such as neoprene, applied to the
interior surface of the waistband, as worn, in superimposed lays,
each of which is sinusoidal and of the same frequency and
preferably of the same amplitude. For esthetic reasons the
respective amplitudes may differ.
In order to present a plurality of discrete protuberances to the
adjacent garment, e.g., a shirt or blouse, for optimum gripping
action, it is preferred to utilize so-called cut rubber which is
obtainable commercially as a continuous length on a bobbin or
spool, and which is rectangular in cross-section, e.g., square.
Other polygonal cross-sectional configurations are suitable so long
as there is desirably presented a plurality of relatively sharp
corners. In practice I prefer to use a square cross section since
the same is readily available commercially. Obviously, as the
number of sides of the polygon is increased the included angle of
the corners is increased and the gripping action is proportionately
decreased. Rubber having a continuously curved periphery may be
used but the desired frictional function is not as beneficial. I
exclude those rubber yarns which consist of a circular rubber core
covered with a textile yarn, whether helically wound, knitted,
braided, netted, or otherwise applied, since it has been found
that, in general, the coefficient of friction of the raw rubber and
the presentation of a multiplicity of sharp corners is appreciably
in excess of the gripping action of the just-mentioned composite
threads of rubber and ordinary textile fibers.
Where, in the description and claims, I employ the word "rubber" I
intend to encompass both natural and synthetic rubber, as well as
other materials of a rubber-like character, which possess
substantial resiliency, i.e., rebound, together with a friction
surface, and yet are sufficiently flexible to allow the ready
formation thereof into the desired sinusoidal configuration. For
details of physical properties of such natural and synthetic rubber
stocks capable of using in carrying out the invention, reference is
made to Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber
Publishing Co., Cleveland, Ohio, 41st ed., pp. 1552-4.
For most purposes a single continuous ridge longitudinally of the
waistband is acceptable but some manufacturers and stylists may
prefer a plurality of ridges.
Waistband material for wearing apparel in general consists of a
woven fabric cut into strips from a bolt of raw material which has
been cut on the bias. The waistband material also generally
includes two or more superimposed layers of strips of fabric of a
number and character dictated by the style and end use of the
garment, assembled by any conventional stitching method and
supplied to the garment maker in rolls, although the invention may
be embodied in a single layer of such base fabric. It is to be
understood that the constituents of the waistband, per se, forms no
part of the invention; and it may be stated, also, that such
material is not noticeably stretchable in the direction of its
length. However, it may possess limited stretch as is the case with
men's and women's knit fabrics. The frictional means of the
invention may be incorporated with the waistband material at the
same time as the several layers thereof are sewn together, or such
means may be incorporated thereafter at the pleasure of the
manufacturer.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 shows, in somewhat magnified form, a side view of the
frictional means of the invention incorporated with a strip of
material forming part of the waistband assembly of an article of
wearing apparel;
FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1 but as seen from the opposite
face of the fabric;
FIG. 3 is a view of the frictional ridge as seen from the edge of
the base fabric, the latter being shown in cross section;
FIG. 4 is a view similar to that of FIG. 3 but expanded in a
vertical sense to illustrate the geometry of the several
elements;
FIG. 5 is a cross section taken on the line 5--5 of FIG. 3; and
FIG. 5 is a cross section taken on the line 6--6 of FIG. 3.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Turning now to the drawing, I have shown, by way of example, a base
fabric, e.g., a piece of waistband material 10, as previously
described, and which, for simplicity and clarity of exposition, is
illustrated as a single thickness. Lengthwise of the material there
is provided ridge 11 comprising at least two rubber threads 14, 14a
of the type previously mentioned, e.g., polychloroprene (neoprene)
of square cross-section, which are laid in sinusoidal form i.e.,
the curve corresponding to simple harmonic motion. The threads are
superimposed on each other in mutually intersecting relation, to
constitute an appreciable ridge upon and outstanding from, the face
of the base fabric. Since the rubber threads will be fed to the
sewing station without any deliberate effort to control the
tendency of the thread to twist on its axis, the threads will be
presented to the adjacent garment as a plurality of discrete,
sharp-cornered protuberances with greatly enhanced frictional
effect. The basically high coefficient of friction of the rubber
and its inherent resiliency supplements the engagement.
The desired lay of the rubber threads is obtained by feeding the
same through the eye of individual fingers which are reciprocated
transversely of the direction of feed in an alternated sequence
prior to anchoring the resulting serpentine lays to the base
fabric. It will be understood that the rubber threads do not
participate in a stitch-forming operation, and, therefore, are not
subject to the difficulties of feeding a filament to be part of a
sewing-machine stitch. As a consequence, the speed of production is
substantially greater than is the case with other methods wherein
the rubber is incorporated with the base fabric as part of a
stitch, e.g., as in my said U.S. Pat. No. 3,052,890.
Concurrently, immediately following positioning of the lays 14,
14a, they are anchored to the base fabric 10 by a row of
conventional stitches 15 of suitable comparatively non-elastic
yarn, e.g., cotton or nylon. However, in the case of a stretch type
of waistband as used in a garment made of knit fabric, the stitches
anchoring the lays of rubber are so constituted as not to detract
from such stretch characteristic. Further, the anchoring yarn
itself may have greater yield than is the case with a "non-stretch"
waistband.
As noted heretofore, it is not necessary that the base fabric be
extensible longitudinally to any appreciable degree and, therefore,
the anchoring stitches 15 need not themselves be elastic.
One mode of achieving the desired construction is to utilize a
sewing machine capable of forming a double lock stitch, as shown
diagrammatically in FIG. 4. This figure is not to be regarded as a
true representation but is included simply to assist in
understanding the invention. Various other stitch formations, such
as a chain stitch or single lock stitch, may be availed of, except
that the double lock stitch is readily run on machines presently
available, and has the important advantage of being
non-ravelling.
Even though FIG. 1 shows the anchoring loops exemplificatively as a
single thread the same may, obviously, be in multiple.
One of the important characteristics of the invention is that the
ridge comprised of rubber threads is of comparatively small area
and not constrictive in a longitudinal direction. Accordingly, the
flesh of the wearer is not subjected to pressure as is the case
with elastic wasitbands presently available which frequently result
in wheals. In this connection I have found that the shirt, blouse,
or other garment which is tucked into the lower garment may be
satisfactorily prevented from sliding or working upwardly by the
use of the invention provided, of course, that the waistband is
properly fitted to the wearer. However, even in those cases where
the waistband is a poor fit and is then gathered, for example, by a
male drawing his belt more tightly, the beneficial effect of the
invention may still be obtained in considerable measure. Stated
otherwise, I do not rely upon constriction in a circumferential
direction to obtain an adequate degree of frictional retention.
* * * * *